Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet
In Home Care Center
Small home·Licensed for 6·North Hills, California
- Care approvals on fileWheelchair · BedriddenState licensing record · September 13, 2026
- Estimated starting rate$4,050 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $3,300–$5,000
- Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
- Room at the last state visit4 of 6 beds occupiedJune 10, 2024 · not a current opening
- Ways to payMedi-Cal ALW acceptedDHCS participant list · August 9, 2026
- Last state visitAugust 3, 2026CDSS inspection record
In Home Care Center is a small care home in North Hills — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents since 2019. Dementia care and hospice care are not on file.
Built from CDSS public records · September 13, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.
Quick answers and the state record
A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
Quick answers about In Home Care Center
Is In Home Care Center licensed?
The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
How many residents is In Home Care Center licensed for?
6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
Has In Home Care Center been cited?
1 Type A and 1 Type B citations since 2019, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. Those records count 13 state visits over the same years.
Is In Home Care Center still open?
This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.
What does In Home Care Center cost?
$4,050 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,300–$5,000. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 9 small homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Among 228 other homes of a similar licensed size across Los Angeles County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,000 to $6,300 a month, and the middle figure is $5,000 (n = 228 other homes publishing a starting rate).
Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.
A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.
The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.
A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.
Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out. What Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver covers in a care home.
Does In Home Care Center take Medi-Cal?
On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home appears on the DHCS participation list, August 9, 2026. Confirm eligibility and current participation with the program. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Who holds the license?
The license is held by In Home Care Center Inc., per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
Is there a hospital nearby?
Mission Community Hospital is 1.8 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.
Can In Home Care Center keep a resident on hospice?
Not on file — the state’s record does not list hospice care on this license. Ask: “Can a resident stay here on hospice, and under what conditions?”
In Home Care Center license and inspection record
- Name on the license: “IN HOME CARE CENTER”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
- License #197609877. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
- Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
- Licensed to In Home Care Center Inc., per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
- First licensed in 2019, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
- 13 state inspection visits since 2019, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
- 1 Type A and 1 Type B citations on file since 2019, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. The same records count 13 state visits in that period.
- 4 complaints and 2 substantiated allegations on file since 2019, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
- The most recent state visit on file is August 3, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗
Can they support the care needed?
California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.
- Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 6 residents
- Dementia / memory careNot on file · ask the home
- Hospice careNot on file · ask the home
- BedriddenApproved · covers up to 1 resident
State licensing record · September 13, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.
Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. SIX (6) NONAMBULATORY OF WHICH ONE (1) MAY BE BEDRIDDEN IN ROOM #3 ONLY.
935 - ELDERLY
CDSS record, verbatim · September 13, 2026
As needs change
5 questions to ask the home — nothing on file yet
- Two-person transfers or a lift
Not on file
Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”
- Someone awake overnight
Not on file
Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”
- Medicines
Not on file
Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”
- Staying through hospice
Hospice waiver not on file
Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”
- If memory loss develops
Dementia-care designation not on file
Ask: “If memory loss develops, what would change — and when would a move be needed?”
What it costs here
Covelight estimate
$4,050a month to start
Likely $3,300–$5,000
From 9 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file
Likely monthly total
$4,050a month
Likely $3,300–$5,200
With a shared room and basic help.
An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.
See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.
Starting monthly rate$4,050likely $3,300–$5,000
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 9 small homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600
Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).
One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000
Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.
- Likely monthly totalLikely $3,300–$5,200
- $4,050
- First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $3,900–$8,350
- $6,050
How people payOn the Medi-Cal waiver list · private pay, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
- Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
- Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home appears on the DHCS participation list, August 9, 2026. Confirm eligibility and current participation with the program. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board. For a resident on SSI/SSP, California’s 2026 standard sends $1,444.07 a month to the home for room and board.
- SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
- VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
- Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
- MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
- The care level
Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.
- What is billed separately
Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.
- Move-in costs
A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.
- Increases
California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.
- What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
- What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
- What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
- Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 9 small homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
9 homes like this within 3 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,300–$5,900.
- Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
- Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
- Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
- Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
- We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
- It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 9 nearby homes behind this estimate
- Healthy Life Service FacilityNorth Hills · 0.4 mi · Small home$5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Alaga HomesNorthridge · 1.2 mi · Small home$6,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Breath of SunshineNorth Hills · 1.4 mi · Small home$3,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- California State Health GroupNorth Hills · 1.6 mi · Small home$3,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Breath of Sunshine PlusNorthridge · 2.2 mi · Small home$3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Mom and Dads RetreatVan Nuys · 2.4 mi · Small home$3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- A Paradise in the ValleyNorthridge · 2.5 mi · Small home$5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living one bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Alalik Care HomeGranada Hills · 2.6 mi · Small home$3,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Grant Serenity Homes of Sf ValleyVan Nuys · 2.8 mi · Small home$7,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
Where it is
- 9023 Gaviota Ave, North Hills, CA 91343Address from the public record · September 13, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.
Opening the neighborhood map…
The state record
California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.
Since 2021, the state has filed 12 documents for this home, and its records count 13 visits since 2019. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated October 20, 2025.
- On file since
- 2021
- State visits
- 13
- Most recent visit
- August 3, 2026
- Occupied · June 10, 2024 visit
- 4 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening
We hold 5 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated January 16, 2024 to June 10, 2024. 5 of the 5 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Unsubstantiated” (5). 5 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 5 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.
Beside homes the same size
- Type A citations1typical 0
- Type B citations1typical 0
- Substantiated allegations2typical 0
- Total complaints4typical 0
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2019.
Year by year
The last 36 months — 9 of 12 documents
Oct 20, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tihesha Smith conducted an unannounced case management visit to address deficiencies. LPA Smith was greeted by staff and disclosed the reason for the visit. The administrator was contacted and arrived later. On 10/09/25, LPA Smith discovered deficiencies during the annual visit, but due to database issues, the deficiencies could not be issued. The following was observed on 10/09/25: Patio furniture (sofa) was severely worn, with large cracks, tears, revealing the white fiber filing inside Pile/collection of trash/recycling and grocery store carts in backyard. Administrator provided pictures later the same day that items have been corrected. Therefore, under Title 22 Regulations, the following deficiency was cited and recorded on LIC 809D. Exit interview conducted and a copy of the report issuethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 20, 2025
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87303(a) · Plan of correction due date: Oct 9, 2025
(a) The facility shall be clean, safe, sanitary and in good repair at all times for the safety and well-being of clients, employees and visitors. [...] This requirement was not met based on observed worn sofa during annual inspection on 10/09/25the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 20, 2025
Plan of correction: Per administrator will remove sofa and purchase new outdoor furniture Cleared same day as visit 10/09/25
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR80088(f) · Plan of correction due date: Oct 9, 2025
(f) Solid waste shall be stored, located and disposed of in a manner that will not transmit communicable diseases or odors, create a nuisance, [...] This requirement was not met based on observed pile of recycling/trash and grocery store shopping carts during annual inspectionthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 20, 2025
Plan of correction: Per administrator items will be dumped/removed. Cleared same day as visit 10/09/25
Oct 9, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Tihesha Smith conducted an unannounced Required 1-year inspection at this facility 10:35 am. LPA was greeted by the staff and disclosed the purpose of the visit. The administrator was contacted and arrived later. LPA conducted a tour of the physical plant to ensure there are no health and safety hazards, and the facility is following Title 22 Regulations. Common areas, which include the kitchen and the combined living and dining room, were evaluated for their ability to safely meet residents' needs. These spaces were inspected for cleanliness, and furniture was assessed for functionality and condition. All common areas were found to be clean, sanitary, and furnished with seating sufficient to accommodate residents comfortably. LPA reviewed the food service areas, food storage and supply (perishable and nonperishable foods). The kitchen food supply was observed and sufficient for the five (5) residents currently residing there. Two (2) days of perishable food observed. The freezer is stocked with frozen foods. The resident medications are locked in standalone cabinet and observed to be locked and inaccessible to residents. There is one (1) fire extinguisher located in living room attached to wall. Fire extinguisher observed to be charged. Laundry room is located in separated room at side of kitchen. The appliances observed to be functional. The locked cabinets in laundry room store toxins and cabinets in laundry area observed to be locked and inaccessible to residents. The facility has a total of three (3) bedrooms and two (2) bathrooms for residents in care. The residents’ bedrooms were properly furnished with at least one chair, nightstand, and sufficient lighting for each resident. The bedrooms had appropriate and adequate bedding and linens such as sheets, pillowcases, and blankets. Main bathroom has the following items available: hand soap, paper towels, and trash cans. The hot water temperature was measured for the bathroom to ensure it is within the required range for residents’ comfort and safety. The water temperature range was 117.0 -degrees Fahrenheit. LPA Smith observed sink in 2nd bathroom removed. Backyard has the following: Table and chairs, and small L shape couch. Patio furniture was observed to be in good repair with the exception of the L shaped couch. Couch worn with large cracks, tears and white exposed filling. Administrator/staff states will have couch removed. Attached Garage: Used for storage/PPEs carbon monoxide and smoke detectors were tested and operable at time of visit. Facility grounds were free of hazards. However, store shopping carts and bags of recycling were observed. Items will be removed. At approximately 01:20 pm, LPA reviewed five (5) resident files and three (3) random staff files. Resident files included admissions agreements and needs and services assessments. Staff files had the appropriate training courses to include CPR and first aid. Deficiencies will be addressed on case management visit. Exit Interview Conducted /Copy of the Report Issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 9, 2025
Oct 12, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Abeye Duguma met with Kristine Dovlatyan for a Required One (01) Year visit. LPA explained the reason for the visit. A tour of the physical plant was conducted at around 9:30 AM and the following was noted: There is one entrance being utilized at the facility. The facility has a total of three (03) bedrooms and two (02) bathrooms. The facility is fire cleared for six (06) non-ambulatory of which one (01) may be bedridden. The facility is currently occupying four (04) residents. The facility has outdoor furniture with a covered shaded area for residents and visitors. The facility does not have a swimming pool/body of water. The garage is currently being used for storage. Laundry detergents, cleaning agents and other toxins are locked away. Kitchen is sufficiently stocked with at least two (02) days perishable and seven (07) days non-perishable food. Frozen foods are wrapped and stored appropriately. Food storage and preparation areas are clean and inaccessible to pests. Knives and sharps are observed to be locked and inaccessible to residents. The living and dining room are neat and clean. The facility maintains a comfortable temperature at 78°F. The smoke and carbon monoxide detectors are hardwired, interconnected and observed to be operational. Fire extinguisher is located near the dining area and observed to be fully charged and last inspected 03/18/2024. (continued on LIC 809-C) The residents' rooms are adequately furnished with appropriate lighting system. Hallways are well lit. Residents have enough personal hygiene product provided by the licensee. The bathroom was checked for cleanliness and proper operations. The hot water temperature was measured at 115.3°F. Towels and washcloths are not shared. There was enough clean linen available in the cabinets. LPA observed medication to be locked and inaccessible to residents. Facility maintains a complete first aid kit. No health and safety hazards noted during the visit. Exit interview conducted. Copy of this report issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 12, 2024
Jun 10, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Resident sustained multiple pressure injuries while in care Staff do not have accurate records for a resident Staff did not abide to the admission agreement
Licensing program analyst (LPA) Tihesha Smith made an unannounced complaint visit to this facility to deliver findings. The administrator was contacted and arrived later. LPA Smith met with the administrator and disclosed the purpose of the visit. During the initial visit on 04/06/24, LPA Jose Gary Tan conducted physical plant tour at 9:15 AM, requested copy of facility documents relevant to the investigation at 9:43 AM and interviewed staff and resident between 9:45 AM to 11:30 AM. On 01/16/24, LPA Tihesha Smith conducted a subsequent visit and interviewed four (04) residents, four (04) staff and reviewed records from 10:50 am – 1:05 pm. Resident #1 (R1) is no longer a resident at the facility and Resident # 6 (R6) unable to speak due to condition. Resident sustained multiple pressure injuries while in care It was alleged that facility resident #1 (R1) sustained multiple skin injuries causing extreme discomfort. Unsubstantiated (cont. from 9099) Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tihesha Smith and Naira Margaryan conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to the facility to investigate the above allegation on 05/23/2024. Staff denied being neglectful in R1’s care. Interviews revealed that R1 was admitted to the facility with red blisters all over their body. Resident was admitted to the facility with assigned hospice services. Although the Administrator was informed that the red blisters on R1’s body are not infected and will not transfer to others, the Administrator sent R1 to the hospital. R1 returned to the facility within 2 hours per discharge records and R1 had a chronic condition: “adult rush” requiring daily treatment. The Administrator stated that R1 was in the facility for one (1) week and within that week due to discomfort, R1 went to the hospital 3 times. On 03/28/23, R’s condition was discussed with the discharge nurse at the hospital and the decision was made to transfer R1 to a Skilled Nursing Facility. A review of the facility records verified the information revealed by the staff. There was no information or evidence available during this investigation to conclude that R1 sustained multiple pressure injuries due to neglect. Therefore, based on interviews and record review, the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. Staff did not have accurate records for resident. It was alleged that staff did not have accurate records for residents. Interview with the administrator revealed that she had all required documents for each resident. A review of the records including R1’s facility file, revealed that although the files were not organized, all required documents were present in folders designated for each resident. Due to no information available to support the allegation, therefore, based on observation and record review the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. Staff did not abide to the admission agreement It was alleged that credible witness observed lack of appropriate admission and discharge documentation. (Cont to 9099C) (cont from 9099A) Staff did not properly safeguard the residents’ medications It was observed that staff #1 (S1) pull out R1’s medication from the unlocked closet in R1’s room to assist R1. At the time of this visit at 2:30pm LPM Margaryan interview S1 in Armenian and she verified the information alleged by the complainant. LPM Margaryan also inspected R1’s room and S1 was able to show a storage space where she was and is currently keeping peroxide solution for R1. Based on interview and observation there is sufficient information to support the allegation. Therefore, the allegation is SUBSTANTIATED at this time. Resident's admission agreement has been forged while in care It was alleged that Resident's admission agreement has been forged while in care. A credible witness observed that the dates on R1’s admission agreement were forged. A review of R1’s admission agreement verified the allegation. There was information or evidence available during this investigation to conclude that Resident's admission agreement has been forged while in care therefore, based on record review and credible witness, the allegation is SUBSTANTIATED at this time. Deficiencies cited on 9099D Exit inteview conducted/copy of report given. (Cont from 9099C) The Administrator stated that she always keeps appropriate documents for all resident’s admission and discharge.She indicated that she is not only keeping admission and discharge records from the facility but also from the hospital and following doctors’ instructions and following all items outlined in the admissions agreements. A review of facility records verified the information received from the Administrator. Due to no information available to support the allegation, therefore, based on observation and record review the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. Exit interview conducted/Copy of report given.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 10, 2024 · control 31-AS-20230405164319
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87465(h)(1)(B) · Plan of correction due date: May 23, 2024
Incidental Medical and Dental Care. (h) (1) Medications shall be centrally stored under the following circumstances: (B) Any medication is determined by the physician to be hazardous if kept in the personal possession of the person for whom it was prescribed This requirement was not met based on observation and interviews medication was not properly stored which posed a health and safety risked for residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 10, 2024
Plan of correction: See Correction below The licensee moved the perixode on day of visit: 05/23/24
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87506(a) · Plan of correction due date: May 23, 2024
(a) The licensee shall ensure that a separate, complete, and current record is maintained for each resident in the facility or in a central administrative location readily available to facility staff and to licensing agency staff. This requirement was not met based on observation and interviews that dates on files were overwriten/crossed out which posed a potential health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 10, 2024
Plan of correction: The licensee will provide a written statement of understanding of how documents should be corrected or updated moving forward. POC date:06/20/24
May 23, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff neglect resulted in a resident to be hospitalized while in care Staff did not properly report an incident involving a resident
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tihesha Smith and Naira Margaryan conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to the facility to investigate the above allegation on 05/23/2024. The administrator was contacted and arrived later. Licensing staff met with the administrator Kristine Dovlatyan and disclosed the purpose of the visit. Staff neglect resulted in a resident to be hospitalized while in care It was alleged that staff neglect resulted in a resident to be hospitalized while in care. To investigate this allegation, during initial visit on 03/06/2023, LPA Smith conducted a physical plant tour, interviewed the administrator, and obtained and requested copies of documents relevant to the investigation. Interview with the administrator revealed that on 01/21/2023 by recommendation from Resident #1 (R1) doctor, R1 was taken to the hospital by the administrator due to weakness, dark urine and odor. Administrator drove R1 to the hospital in personal vehicle and R1 was able to ambulate to the car and get in without Unsubstantiated (Cont from 9099) assistance. The administrator was instructed by the doctor to contact them upon arrival. Administrator disclosed that R1 was admitted to the hospital after she took him there. Administrator also revealed followed up with hospital, but hospital staff only disclosed that since R1 would not be returning to the facility they will not provide any information regarding the status of R1. Based interview although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is insufficient evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. Therefore, the allegation is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. Staff did not properly report an incident involving a resident It was alleged that staff did not properly report an incident involving a resident. Review of records on 03/06/23 reveal that incident reports are faxed within required timeframe and a copy of the incident report form is kept in resident records. Interview with administrator revealed resident’s responsible parties are contacted, licensing notified (and additional agencies if any). Based interviews and record review although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is insufficient evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. Therefore, the allegation is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 23, 2024 · control 31-AS-20230227123033
May 23, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not prevent resident from eloping from facility
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tihesha Smith and Naira Margaryan conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to the facility to investigate the above allegation on 05/23/2024. The administrator was contacted and arrived later. Licensing staff met with the administrator Kristine Dovlatyan and disclosed the purpose of the visit. Staff did not prevent resident from eloping from facility It was alleged that Staff did not prevent resident from eloping from facility. To investigate this allegation, during initial visit on 03/06/2023, LPA Smith interviewed the administrator, staff and requested documents relevant to the investigation from approximately 12:45 pm am to 2:10 pm. Resident # 1(R1) is no longer at the facility. Interviews with the administrator reveal Resident #1 (R1) did not elope from the facility. Administrator notes that all windows, and doors of the facility have alarms that chime when they are Unsubstantiated (Cont from 9099) opened and there are cameras around the facility that also record activity on the facility and no residents have been recorded leaving the facility. Three (3) of three (3) staff reveal will they respond immediately when any chime sounds within the facility. They immediately check inside and outside the facility including all cameras. LPA Smith checked the facility windows, and doors, and observed all sensors to be active and chimed audibly when opened. Chimes were also rechecked during today's visit and can be heard through out the facility. Based interviews and observation although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is insufficient evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. Therefore, the allegation is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 23, 2024 · control 31-AS-20240410095157
Apr 3, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Due to neglect, resident was dehydrated
At 9:50 a.m. on 04/03/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nicholas Reed conducted an unannounced, initial complaint visit. LPA met with Staff #1 (S1) and later the administrator and disclosed the reason for the visit. Regarding the allegation “Due to neglect, resident was dehydrated” it as alleged Resident #1 (R1) was neglected and not provided adequate hydration. To investigate the allegation, LPA toured the facility at 10:00 a.m. today, conducted a file review of pertinent records at 10:30 a.m. including but not limited to the staff list, resident list, medical assessment, and care notes, and interviewed the administrator, two (02) staff, a nurse, and one (01) out of four (04) residents between 11:00 a.m. and 12:30 p.m. Interview with the administrator at 11:00 a.m. today revealed R1 often refused bathing, grooming, and feeding support. Staff called 9-1-1 for R1 on 03/24/2024 due to low blood pressure and malnourishment. Unsubstantiated Interview with Staff #2 (S2) at 11:30 a.m. today revealed R1 refused staff attempts to feed and provide fluids to R1 on 03/23/2024. Staff reminded R1 of the importance to eat and drink fluids. Staff provided a variety of options for R1, but R1 only drank a little juice and ate no food. Interview with Resident #2 (R2) at 12:00 p.m. today revealed staff provide sufficient care and supervision to the residents in the facility. Interview with a hospital nurse at 12:30 p.m. today revealed R1 suffered from confusion and would not accept food or fluids, so a feeding tube was provided. Record review confirmed R1 had a history of refusing care at the facility. Based on interviews and record review, staff provided adequate care and supervision, and R1 refused care. Therefore, the allegation is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. No immediate health and safety risks were observed. Exit interview conducted. Appeal rights discussed. Copy of report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 3, 2024 · control 31-AS-20240326144618
Jan 16, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not ensure a resident was properly fed while in care
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tihesha Smith conducted an unannounced complaint visit to the facility to investigate the above allegation. LPA met with the administrator Kristine Dovlatyan and disclosed the purpose of the visit. During initial visit, on 03/06/2023, LPA Smith conducted a physical plant tour, interviewed the administrator, and obtained and requested copies of documents relevant to the investigation. Staff did not ensure a resident was properly fed while in care It was alleged that Resident #1 (R1) was not being fed. To investigate this allegation, LPA Smith conducted a physical plant tour at 10:40, interviewed four (04) residents, four (04) staff and reviewed records from 10:50 am – 1:05 pm. (R1) is no longer a resident at the facility and LPA unable to reach for an interview. Resident # 6 (R6) unable to speak due to condition. During interviews LPA observed lunch meal being prepared and staff informing residents lunch is being Unsubstantiated (cont from 9099) served. Interviews with four (4) out of four (4) staff revealed three (3) meals are served with a snack served in between meals. Two (2) out of two (2) staff reveal residents may refuse meal but a plate is always served. Interview with four (4) out of four (4) residents revealed received all meals when present at the facility. Based on observations, record review and interviews, there is not enough information to verify the allegation. Therefore, the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 16, 2024 · control 31-AS-20230227123033
The state marks this report as 3 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 2. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
Jan 8, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Tihesha Smith conducted an unannounced Required 1-year inspection at this facility at approximately 10:45 am. LPA disclosed to staff the purpose of the visit and the administrator was contacted and arrived later LPA conducted a tour of the physical plant to ensure there are no health and safety hazards and facility is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. Common areas were observed for the ability to safely serve the needs residents. These included the kitchen, dining area and living room. The common areas were checked for cleanliness and furniture was checked for functionality. Common areas observed to be furnished appropriately. LPA reviewed the food service areas, food storage and supply (perishable and nonperishable foods). The kitchen food supply was observed and sufficient for the five (5) residents currently residing there. Sharps stored in top kitchen drawer, observed to be locked and inaccessible to residents. The resident medications are locked in standalone cabinet. The medications were observed to e inaccessible to residents. There is one (1) fire extinguisher located in living room attached to wall. Fire extinguisher observed to be charged. The facility has three (3) bedrooms and two (2) bathrooms: The resident bedrooms furnished with at least one chair, nightstand, and sufficient lighting for each resident. (cont. from 809) The bedrooms had appropriate bedding and linens such as sheets, pillowcases, mattress pads, and blankets. LPA observed a supply of linens stored in laundry room cabinets above washer and dryer. The hot water temperature was measured for the bathroom to ensure it is within the required range for residents’ comfort and safety. The water temperature range was 115.6 -degrees Fahrenheit. Surrounding Grounds: Entry/exits were free of obstruction. Sufficient seating for outdoor furniture. Laundry room is adjacent to kitchen. Appliances observed to be in good repair. Toxins stored in cabinets in laundry area observed to be locked and inaccessible to residents. Garage: used to store supplies and equipment At approximately 1:15 pm, LPA Smith reviewed five (5) resident files and five (5) staff files. Resident files included physician’s reports and Centrally stored meds. Staff files included current first aid and administrator license is current and posted. No deficiencies cited. Exit interview conducted/Copy of report giventhe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 8, 2024
What the state’s words mean
CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗
Life here
Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.
The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.
Before you call
Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.
- What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
- Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
- Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
- What could change whether someone can stay here?
- Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?
Other homes nearby
The nearest licensed homes in Los Angeles County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.
Angeles Assisted Living
North Hills · Small home · 0.2 mi away
$4,450 a month to start · Covelight estimate
G & A Care
North Hills · Small home · 0.3 mi away
$4,650 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Otrium Care Homes
North Hills · Small home · 0.3 mi away
$5,100 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Golden Rain Senior Care
North Hills · Small home · 0.3 mi away
$4,900 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Bahama Assisted Living
North Hills · Small home · 0.3 mi away
$4,450 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Senior Stewards Care Home
North Hills · Small home · 0.3 mi away
$4,700 a month to start · Covelight estimate