The state also lists Huntington Beach Oasis at this address under another licence.
Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet
Huntington Eldercare IV
Small home·6 while this license was open·Huntington Beach, California
- Care approvals on fileWheelchair · HospiceState licensing record · September 13, 2026
- Home size6 while this license was openSmall care home · the state license record
- Room at the last state visit0 of 6 beds occupiedJanuary 22, 2026 · not a current opening
- Licence holderHuntington Eldercare Inc.Since 2007 · 3 licensed homes
Huntington Eldercare IV in Huntington Beach held a license for a small care home — a residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE). The license covered 6 residents, first issued in 2007. The state lists this licence as “Closed, Change of Ownership.”
Built from CDSS public records · September 13, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.
Quick answers and the state record
A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
Quick answers about Huntington Eldercare IV
Is Huntington Eldercare IV licensed?
The state lists this license as “Closed, Change of Ownership,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
How many residents is Huntington Eldercare IV licensed for?
6 residents while this license was open — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
Has Huntington Eldercare IV been cited?
0 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2007, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. Those records count 4 state visits over the same years.
Is Huntington Eldercare IV still open?
This license is listed as closed, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. The state also lists Huntington Beach Oasis at this address under another license.
What does Huntington Eldercare IV cost?
This license is listed as closed, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
Among 13 other homes of a similar licensed size in Huntington Beach that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,000 to $6,000 a month, and the middle figure is $4,800 (n = 13 other homes publishing a starting rate).
Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.
A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.
Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
Does Huntington Eldercare IV take Medi-Cal?
On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this license is listed as closed. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Who holds the license?
The license was held by Huntington Eldercare Inc., per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
Can Huntington Eldercare IV keep a resident on hospice?
Hospice care is on this closed license’s record, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
Huntington Eldercare IV license and inspection record
- Name on the license: “HUNTINGTON ELDERCARE IV”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
- License #306003798. The state lists this license as “Closed, Change of Ownership,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
- This license covered 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
- This license was held by Huntington Eldercare Inc., per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
- First licensed in 2007, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
- 4 state inspection visits since 2007, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
- 0 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2007, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. The same records count 4 state visits in that period.
- 1 complaint and 0 substantiated allegations on file since 2007, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
- The most recent state visit on file is January 22, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗
Can they support the care needed?
California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.
- Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 6 residents
- Dementia / memory careNot on file · ask the home
- Hospice careApproved · covers up to 3 residents
- BedriddenNot on file · ask the home
State licensing record · September 13, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.
Read the state’s own wording
6 NON-AMBULATORY. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 3.
985 - RCFE / HOSPICE
CDSS record, verbatim · September 13, 2026
As needs change
- Staying through hospice
Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 3 — care may continue at the end of life
Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”
State licensing record · September 13, 2026
4 more questions to ask the home
- Two-person transfers or a lift
Not on file
Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”
- Someone awake overnight
Not on file
Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”
- Medicines
Not on file
Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”
- If memory loss develops
Dementia-care designation not on file
Ask: “If memory loss develops, what would change — and when would a move be needed?”
What it costs here
Typical starting rate
$5,000a month to start
Likely $3,650–$6,850
From homes this size in Orange County · this home’s rate is not on file
Likely monthly total
$5,000a month
Likely $3,650–$6,950
With a shared room and basic help.
An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.
See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.
Starting monthly rate$5,000likely $3,650–$6,850
Too few nearby homes publish a rate, so this is the typical starting rate 186 small homes publish in Orange County, with a wider likely range. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600
Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).
One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000
Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.
- Likely monthly totalLikely $3,650–$6,950
- $5,000
- First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,550–$9,800
- $7,000
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
- Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
- Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis license is listed as closed. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
- SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
- VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
- Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
- MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
- The care level
Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.
- What is billed separately
Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.
- Move-in costs
A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.
- Increases
California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.
- What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
- What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
- What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
- Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWhy this is a county figure
Too few nearby homes publish a rate, so this is the typical starting rate 186 small homes publish in Orange County, with a wider likely range. This home’s own rate is not on file.
- Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
- Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
- Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
- Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
- We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
- It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Where it is
- 9442 Nautilus Drive, Huntington Beach, CA 92646Address from the public record · September 13, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.
A map position is not on file for this address.
The state record
California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.
Since 2022, the state has filed 4 documents for this home, and its records count 4 visits since 2007. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on January 22, 2026 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Unsubstantiated.”
- On file since
- 2022
- State visits
- 4
- Most recent visit
- January 22, 2026
- Occupied at that visit
- 0 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening
We hold 1 complaint report the state published for this home, dated January 22, 2026. 1 of the 1 carries the state's recorded outcome word: “Unsubstantiated” (1). 1 includes the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 1 complaint report below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.
Beside homes the same size
- Type A citations0typical 0
- Type B citations0typical 0
- Substantiated allegations0typical 0
- Total complaints1typical 0
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2007.
Year by year
The last 36 months — 3 of 4 documents
Jan 22, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff caused injuries to a resident while in care Resident is left unattended for extended period of time Resident incontinence needs are not being met while in care Staff speaks inappropriately towards a resident Residents are being mistreated while in care
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jenifer Tirre delivered the complaint investigation findings by telephone due to facility’s closure on December 10, 2025. LPA Tirre discussed the complaint findings with Licensee Carmen Achim. During the course of investigation, the Department interviewed staff, made observations and reviewed records. Department received Resident Roster, Appraisal Needs and Service Plan and Physician’s Report. The investigation conducted revealed the following: On November 19, 2021, the department received a complaint alleging that staff caused injuries to a resident while in care, resident is left unattended for extended period of time, resident incontinence needs are not being met while in care, staff speaks inappropriately towards a resident, and residents are being mistreated in care. Interviews were conducted with facility staff, visual observations were made, records were reviewed. The following were mentioned and noted per allegations: CONTINUED ON 9099C Unsubstantiated Regarding allegation Staff caused injuries to a resident while in care, It was alleged that Resident 1 (R1) sustained bruises due to improper handling of Staff 1 (S1). Per interviews conducted with staff members, two of three staff stated that they helped assist R1 when they asked for help. Three of three staff interviewed stated that Staff 1 primarily handled R1 and that R1 was “full assist”. Three of three staff members stated that they never noticed bruising on R1’s body. Per interview with S1, states they never handled R1 in a rough manner and that R1 was very alert. Three of three staff stated that they never witnessed other staff mishandling R1 while in care. During initial visit conducted on November 24, 2021, LPA toured facility physical plant and observed residents relaxing inside bedrooms watching television. LPA observed R1 inside bedroom on recliner chair and did not observe any visible bruising on R1’s body. LPA was unable to interview R1 due to R1 resting on recliner at time of visit. LPA attempted to interview other residents but due to their medical condition’s interviews were not successful. The LPA attempted to identify and contact R1’s family members for interviews, however, no information was available during record review. Per Record Review, LPA Tirre did not observe any incident reports related to alleged injury for R1. Regarding Allegations Resident is left unattended for extended period of time and Resident incontinence needs are not being met while in care. It was alleged that R1 was left alone for long periods of time that they often had incontinent accidents due to not being taken to the bathroom. Investigation revealed the following: Per staff interviews, Three of three staff stated R1 was never left unattended due to facility always had staff present inside the facility. Three of Three staff stated that R1 needed full assistance with areas of daily living including toileting and staff stated they were available to help R1 whenever needed. One of three staff interviewed stated that resident wore pull up underwear and was not left soiled for periods of time. One of three staff stated they could not recall if R1 had incontinence issues. During visits to facility, LPA observed two staff members on duty who were attentive to residents’ needs. One staff member was checking on residents in bedrooms while another staff member was supervising other residents in common area. The LPA attempted to identify and contact R1’s family members for interviews, however, no information was available during record review. During Department visits, Department reviewed Resident records and observed that R1’s Physician’s report dated May 3, 2021, stated that R1 had diagnosis of Spinocerebellar ataxia stating R1 was wheelchair bound and fall risk. Physician’s Report also stated that R1 does not require continuous bed care and is able to communicate their needs. CONTINUED ON 9099C A record review of R1’s Appraisal/ Needs Service Plan dated August 12, 2021, stated under R1’s physical health. R1 is wheelchair bound and needs 100% assistance. Record review did not mention R1 having incontinent issues during time at facility. Regarding Allegation Staff speak inappropriately towards resident, it was alleged that staff were verbally abusive to R1, the investigation revealed the following: Staff interviews were conducted with three staff. Staff 1 stated that they never yelled or spoke inappropriately to R1. Staff 1 mentioned that R1 could be mean towards staff due to language barrier and stated that R1 would often tell staff “Oh you don’t understand me, this will be your last day, you are fired”. Staff 2 stated they never yelled at R1 or used profanity. Staff 3 stated that they never spoke inappropriately towards R1 and did not witness staff verbally abusing R1. Staff 3 stated that R1 was not pleased with any of staff at facility and often had an attitude and would belittle other staff for having foreign accent. LPA attempted to interview other residents but due to their medical condition’s interviews were not successful. The LPA attempted to identify and contact R1’s family members for interviews, however, no information was available during record review. During visits to facility, LPA did not observe any staff speaking in an inappropriate manner to residents. LPA observed staff being courteous of residents asking residents politely about their needs. Regarding Allegation residents are being mistreated while in care, it was alleged that residents were improperly mishandled, and the investigation revealed the following. Three of three staff were interviewed and three of three staff stated that R1 was not mistreated. Staff interviews stated that R1 was full assist and staff would often have to transfer R1 from chair to bed or chair to toilet. Staff 1 stated that they were never rough in handling residents and stated that R1 was very alert and often expressed if they did not like the way things were done. Three of three staff stated that staff tended to resident when needed assistance and if Resident requested for something. LPA observed R1 inside bedroom recliner resting and LPA was unable to interview at initial time of visit. LPA attempted to interview other residents but due to their medical conditions, interviews were not successful. The LPA attempted to identify and contact R1’s family members for interviews, however, no information was available during record review. During visits, LPA did not observe any staff mistreating residents physically or verbally. LPA observed S1 move a resident from bed to wheelchair and did not observe S1 mishandle resident or resident complain about the way they were handled. Per record review, LPA did not observe an incident reports related to residents being mistreated. CONTINUED ON 9099C Based on information provided, there is lack of supportive information between allegations reported, interviews, observations and records reviewed deeming all allegations: Staff caused injuries to a resident while in care, Resident is left unattended for extended period of time, Resident incontinence needs are not being met while in care, Staff speaks inappropriately towards a resident & Residents are being mistreated while in care to be UNSUBSTANTIATED, meaning that although the allegation may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violations occurred as reported. Facility closed and had a change of ownership effective December 10, 2025. An exit interview was conducted via telephone with Licensee Carmen Achim and a copy of this report was discussed and mailed out to last provided address for Licensee.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 22, 2026 · control 22-AS-20211119160554
Dec 8, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rose Ruppert made an unannounced visit to conduct an Annual Required Evaluation. LPA was greeted and granted entry by Staff #1 (S1) at 8:15am. LPA met with Administrator, Carmen Achim and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA was informed that the facility is currently going through a Change of Ownership (CHOW). The facility is a seven bedroom, single story residence with an approved fire clearance of six non-ambulatory residents and an approved hospice waiver for three.. The facility currently has a census of six residents in care. During today’s visit, LPA toured the facility and inspected the physical plant, including but not limited to testing all smoke detectors, testing hot water temperature in six of six resident bathrooms, and testing auditory devices on all exits, The hot water temperature measured between 113.7 and 116.6 degrees Fahrenheit and all smoke detectors were operational. The fire extinguisher is charged and was serviced on March 7, 2025. The facility’s last fire drill was conducted on September 30, 2025. LPA inspected the facility food supply and observed the facility retained a minimum of two days perishable and seven days non-perishable food on hand. More than fifteen gallons of water was observed in the garage with the emergency food supply. LPA observed medication storage and reviewed the centrally stored medications. Per review medications are being given as prescribed. A PRN/ As Needed log is available but has not been used due to residents not requiring as needed medications A First Aid Kit was observed with all of the required elements. LPA toured the exterior of the property and observed a shaded seating area and all exterior exit gates were self-latching. There are no hazards or obstructions in outdoor pathways and there is plenty of space for activities. LPA also observed the PUB 475 and Long Term Care Ombudsman posters posted. (Continued on LIC 809-C) (Continued from LIC 809) LPA toured resident bedrooms and noted all had the required furnishings and clean linens. All resident bathrooms had grab bars and there were no chemicals under any resident sinks. Postural support orders were on file. LPA reviewed two of two staff training and fingerprint records and conducted a review of three of resident records. Updated Admissions Agreements were on file. LPA interviewed alert residents regarding their quality of care and spoke to staff present regarding care provided. LPA confirmed that administrator has a current administrator certificate which expires on December 1, 2027. Based on the observations made during today’s visit, the facility appears to be in compliance with Title 22 Division 6 of the California Code of Regulations, no deficiencies cited on this date. An exit interview was conducted with Carmen Achim, Administrator and a copy of the report and files reviewed (LIC 858 & LIC 859) were given at the time of the visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 8, 2025
Mar 27, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
On this day Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Fred Arias made an unannounced visit to conduct a required annual visit. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility by staff and explained the reason for the visit. Facility is licensed for 6 non-ambulatory residents. Facility has an approved hospice waiver for 3 residents and the home currently has 5 residents, with 3 residents on hospice. Administrator (AD) Carmen Achim arrived shortly after. AD has a valid certificate that expires on 12/1/2025. AD provided updated liability insurance that expires on 5/30/2025. LPA along with staff 2 (S2) toured the facility at 1:30 PM. LPA toured the physical plant, checked food service, facility documentation and the first aid kit. The home consists of 6 resident bedrooms, living room, dining room, staff room, and kitchen as well as 8 bathrooms. LPA toured the kitchen and observed sharps locked in a cabinet during today's visit. Perishable and non-perishable food supply was checked and adequately stocked at time of visit. At 1:36pm, LPA observed 2 large bottles of opened alcohol in the kitchen refrigerator. At 1:40pm, LPA observed 1 out of 4 electric stove burners non-operational. At 1:46pm, LPA observed scissors in an unlocked right drawer of the sink in the bathroom nearest to the living room. At 1:52pm, LPA observed clorox cleaner in an unlocked cabinet under the sink in the bathroom of bedroom 5. Resident bedrooms had the required furniture, bed linens and closet/drawer space to accommodate each resident comfortably. Resident bathrooms were checked. Toilets and water faucets worked properly, grab bars were secure and shower was free of mold/mildew. Water temperature measured between 107.7 degrees F and 110.8 degrees F in all bathrooms. Resident bath towels, toiletries and personal hygiene supplies were adequately stocked. Common areas were clean and clear of hazards. Auditory exit alarms were operational during today's visit. Smoke detectors tested operational during today's visit. Fire extinguishers were fully charged. LPA reviewed the infection control and emergency disaster plans. Outside grounds were toured. Walkways around the home were clear of hazards. There are no security bars or weapons on the premises. First aid kit contained all required items including tweezers, scissors and thermometer. Facility conducts activities in the form of exercise and pet therapy. There is shaded outdoor seating for residents. Exit gates are unlocked and operational. LPA observed the emergency food supply. LPA reviewed five resident files and two staff files. All resident files contained required documentation including physician reports, and resident appraisals. Staff files reviewed contained required documentation including required annual training, medical assessment/ TB, criminal record clearance and proof of CPR training. LPA reviewed medication storage and administration. Medications are stored in a locked closet. Based on the observations made during today’s visit, deficiencies are being cited per Title 22 Division 6 of the California Code of Regulations. This report was discussed with the facility representative and a copy was provided along with appeal rights.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 27, 2025
The state marks this report as 9 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 5. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
What the state’s words mean
CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗
Who holds the licence
Huntington Eldercare Inc., licensed since 2007, operates 3 licensed homes in California. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.
- Huntington Elder-Care I · Huntington Beach
- Huntington Elder-Care II · Huntington Beach
Life here
Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.
The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.
Other homes nearby
Licensed homes in Orange County. This home has no map location on the state record, so these are not ordered by distance. Every listed home appears on the same terms.
1 Serenity Senior Care Home
Mission Viejo · Small home
$6,250 a month to start · Covelight estimate
A Crown Royale Senior Home
Laguna Niguel · Small home
$5,650 a month to start · Covelight estimate
A Faithful Home
Mission Viejo · Small home
$4,500 a month to start · Listed by the home
A Faithful Home of Anaheim
Anaheim · Small home
$6,500 a month to start · Listed by the home
A Faithful Home of Huntington Beach
Huntington Beach · Small home
$4,500 a month to start · Listed by the home
A Faithful Home of Los Alamitos
Rossmoor · Small home
$7,500 a month to start · Covelight estimate