Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Highlands Care Home IV

Small home·Licensed for 6·Vallejo, California

Licensed since 2000Licence #486800855
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Dementia · HospiceState licensing record · September 27, 2026
  • Estimated starting rate$4,600 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $3,750–$5,700
  • Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit6 of 6 beds occupiedAugust 20, 2026 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitAugust 20, 2026CDSS inspection record

Highlands Care Home IV is a small care home in Vallejo — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents since 2000. Bedridden care is not on file.

Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Highlands Care Home IV

Is Highlands Care Home IV licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

How many residents is Highlands Care Home IV licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Has Highlands Care Home IV been cited?

0 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2000, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 9 state visits over the same years.

Is Highlands Care Home IV still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Highlands Care Home IV cost?

$4,600 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,750–$5,700. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 11 small homes and similar homes within 15 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 5 other homes of a similar licensed size across Solano County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,721 to $5,000 a month, and the middle figure is $4,550 (n = 5 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Highlands Care Home IV take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Salvador, Maria M., per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Kaiser Foundation Hospital & Rehab Center - Vallejo is 2 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Highlands Care Home IV keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Highlands Care Home IV license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “HIGHLANDS CARE HOME IV”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #486800855. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed to Salvador, Maria M., per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2000, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 9 state inspection visits since 2000, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2000, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 9 state visits in that period.
  • 2 complaints and 0 substantiated allegations on file since 2000, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is August 20, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved by the state
  • Dementia / memory careApproved by the state
  • Hospice careApproved by the state
  • BedriddenNot on file · ask the home

State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
6 MAY BE NON-AMBULATORY. HOSPICE WAIVER GRANTED FOR ONE.

983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA

CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation on file

    Ask: “Can we read the dementia care disclosure and discuss how daily support works?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

3 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$4,600a month to start

Likely $3,750–$5,700

From 11 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$4,600a month

Likely $3,750–$5,900

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room
  • Starting monthly rate$4,600likely $3,750–$5,700

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 11 small homes and similar homes within 15 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $3,750–$5,900
$4,600
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,400–$9,000
$6,600
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 11 small homes and similar homes within 15 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

11 homes like this within 15 miles publish starting rates mostly between $4,050–$7,000.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 11 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 333 Foresthill Drive, Vallejo, CA 94589Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2022, the state has filed 9 documents for this home, and its records count 9 visits since 2000. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated August 20, 2026.

On file since
2022
State visits
9
Most recent visit
August 20, 2026
Occupied at that visit
6 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 2 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated May 29, 2024 to August 20, 2026. 2 of the 2 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Unsubstantiated” (2). 2 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 2 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations0typical 0
  • Type B citations0typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations0typical 0
  • Total complaints2typical 0

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2000.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20263402025110202412020231102022110

The last 36 months — 7 of 9 documents

20263 state visits · 4 documents
Aug 20, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Lack of Supervision Personal Rights

At approximately 12:20PM Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Magdaleno arrived unannounced to deliver findings regarding the above allegations and met with Caregiver Lolita Pimental. Administrator Maria Salvador was contact via telephone and gave permission for caregiver to sign and receive report. Lack of Supervision, Personal Rights - Complaint alleges that due to lack of supervision, residents were using illegal drugs in the facility and at least one resident was providing drugs to at least another resident. Alleged activity resulted in resident eloping from the facility due to another resident requesting money from them to buy drugs. Three of four residents interviews denied drug use in the home while the fourth resident did not answer the question. A fifth resident refused to be interviewed. Two of three staff interviewed reported suspicions that residents were using drugs in the home but denied seeing drugs being used in the home. Review of Plan of Operation and Facility Policies indicated that potential risks to resident health and safety shall be reported. Continued LIC9099C... Unsubstantiated Continued from LIC9099... Staff reported that they don’t have a policy for how often residents are checked on. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, the Department has found there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation(s) did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are unsubstantiated. Exit interview conducted with Caregiver, whose signature on form confirms receipt.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 20, 2026 · control 21-AS-20260423131419
Aug 20, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

At approximately 12:20PM Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Magdaleno arrived unannounced to conduct a case management - other visit and met with Caregiver Lolita Pimental. Administrator Maria Salvador was contact via telephone and gave permission for caregiver to sign and receive report. The purpose of this visit was to cite deficiencies found during investigation of complaint 21-AS-20260423131419. Review of facility Plan of Operation and Facility Policies indicated that potential risks to resident health and safety shall be reported. Interviews with staff indicated there was a suspicion of drug use in the facility due to observed changes in resident behaviors, changes in residents relationships, and suspicions from other residents. These potential risks were not elevated and there was no increase in residents checks nor were updated appraisals conducted. Deficiencies are cited from the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6 of California Regulation and the Health and Safety Code. Failure to correct the cited deficiency(ies), on or before the Plan of Correction (POC) due date, or repeat violations within a 12-month period, may result in a civil penalty assessment. Appeal rights were provided. See LIC809D. Exit interview conducted with Caregiver, whose signature on form confirms receipt.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 20, 2026

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87208 · Plan of correction due date: Sep 18, 2026

87208(a) The licensee shall have and maintain a current, written definitive plan of operation for the facility. The licensee shall operate the facility in accordance with the terms specified in the plan of operation and may be cited for not doing so… This requirement not met by licensee as evidenced by: Staff did not report potential health and safety risks to residents in care as stipulated by Plan of Operation which poses/posed a potential risk to the Health and Safety of residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 20, 2026

Plan of correction: Licensee shall submit proof of staff training regarding facility policies by Plan of Correction due date of 09/18/2026 by 5:00PM.

May 21, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

At approximately 9:55AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Magdaleno arrived unannounced to conduct a required 1-year annual inspection and met with Caregiver Lolita Pimentel. Assistant Administrator Christianne Salvador was called and gave permission for caregiver to sign and receive report. Facility is a Residential Care Facility for the Elderly (RCFE) with five (5) residents in care. Facility has a Dementia Care Plan, a Hospice waiver for one (1), with zero (0) Hospice residents currently in care, and is approved for all non-ambulatory residents. LPA reviewed the Facility's Staff Roster and found that all staff on-site were background cleared and associated to the facility per regulation. At approximately 10:20AM, LPA initiated a tour of the facility with Caregiver and observed the following: Facility is a one (1) story home, was a comfortable temperature, and passageways were free from obstructions. Facility's fire extinguisher was observed charged and last serviced 2/26. Combination Smoke and Carbon Monoxide detectors were tested and operational during inspection. Water temperature measured 106.3 degrees F, which is within the allowable range of 105 to 120 degrees F per Title 22 regulations. Additional bathroom was being renovated during this visit with a same day estimated completion time. LPA reminded caregiver that Community Care Licensing shall be informed of renovations/construction in order to ensure resident safety. LPA observed a supply of clean linens, hygiene, incontinent care, and paper products available for residents. Residents' bedrooms were inspected and observed to have all the appropriate furnishings as outlined in Title 22 regulations. Cabinets containing cleaning supplies and other items that could pose a risk were locked. LPA observed one unlocked shed in the backyard which contained old supplies. There is a shaded seating area in the backyard with outdoor space for activities, however, facility back porch had old bathroom appliances that will be taken by construction crew upon construction finish. Continued LIC809C... Continued from LIC809... LPA observed at least a two (2) day supply of perishable and seven (7) day supply of non-perishable food, as well as an emergency water supply. Caregiver was reminded of the importance of checking fresh foods. Facility has an internet access device and internet available to residents in care, and the phone was observed operational during today's inspection. LPA observed a supply of PPE, emergency supplies, a first aid kit, and flashlights. At approximately 10:55AM LPA conducted a review of three (3) staff records. No deficiency cited. At approximately 11:15AM LPA conducted a review of five (5) resident records. No deficiency cited. At approximately 11:40AM LPA and Caregiver conducted a spot check of medication and medication records. Medication is centrally stored and locked. Maria Salvador Administrator Certificate 7004161740 expires 03/21/2028. Updated copies of the following documents shall be submitted to CCL by 6/19/2026: Liability Insurance LIC500 - Personnel Report LIC308 - Designation of Responsibility LIC610E - Emergency Disaster Plan No deficiencies cited. Exit interview conducted with Caregiver, whose signature on form confirms receipt.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 21, 2026

The state marks this report as 5 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 3. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

Apr 16, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Magdaleno arrived unannounced to conduct a Case Management - Other visit and met with Assistant Administrator Christianne Salvador. This visit was to conduct a follow up and gather more information regarding an Incident Report (IR) submitted by the facility on 4/3/2026. The incident report detailed a resident (R1) who eloped from the facility on 4/3/2026 afternoon. Per interviews, R1 was taken to the hospital on 4/3/2026 and after further outings with staff, returned and went into their room. Staff later discovered R1 had left the facility without staff knowledge and has not returned as of the date of this visit. Review of most recent LIC602-Physicians Report dated 1/2023 indicated that R1 is not able to leave facility unassisted. Review of R1 Care Plan dated 1/26 indicated R1 is very independent and review of Conservatorship Paperwork dated 10/25 indicated R1 has had their conservator lifted. Interviews with staff indicated R1 has not shown elopement behaviors at this facility, however, R1 does have a history of elopement from previous facilities. Deficiencies are cited from the California Code of Regulations (CCRs), and/or the Health and Safety Code. Failure to correct the cited deficiency(ies), on or before the Plan of Correction (POC) due date, may result in a civil penalty assessment. See LIC809D. Appeal rights were provided. Additional civil penalties may be assessed based on Health and Safety Code 1569.49(e) or (f), or 1548(e) or (f), 1568.0822(e) or (f).** Exit interview conducted with Assistant Administrator, whose signature on form confirms receipt.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 16, 2026

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87411(a) · Plan of correction due date: Apr 17, 2026

87411(a) Personnel Requirements - General Facility personnel shall at all times be sufficient in numbers, and competent to provide the services necessary to meet resident needs. This requirement was not met as evidence by: Based on incident report and interview, facility did not provide supervision to R1 resulting in an elopement. The absence/lack of supervision is an immediate risk to the Health, Safety and Rights of resident in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 16, 2026

Plan of correction: Licensee shall plan to CCL by 4/17/2026 re: conducting ongoing in-service training about elopement procedures as well as updating resident assessment upon change of condition.

20251 state visit · 1 document
Apr 28, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

At approximately 12:50 PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Elias Magdaleno arrived unannounced to conduct a required 1-year annual inspection and was greeted by Caregiver. Administrator Maria Salvador was unavailable and Assistant Administrator (AA) Christine Salvador was sent to sign report. Facility is a Residential Care Facility for the Elderly (RCFE) with six (6) residents in care. At time of visit, three (3) residents were present with the rest at day program. Facility has a Dementia Care Plan, a Hospice waiver for one (1), with zero (0) Hospice residents currently in care, and is approved for all non-ambulatory residents. At approximately 1:15 PM, LPA initiated a tour of the facility with Caregiver and observed the following: Facility is a one (1) story home, was a comfortable temperature, and passageways were free from obstructions. Fire extinguishers were last inspected 3/25. Smoke and Carbon Monoxide detectors were tested and operational during inspection. Water temperature measured 112.4 degrees F and 105.9 degrees F, which is within the allowable range of 105 to 120 degrees F per Title 22 regulations. LPA observed a supply of clean linens, hygiene, incontinent care, and paper products available for residents. Residents' bedrooms were inspected and observed to have all the appropriate furnishings as outlined in Title 22 regulations. Cabinets containing cleaning supplies and other items that could pose a risk were locked. LPA observed at least a two (2) day supply of perishable and seven (7) day supply of non-perishable food. Food was found to be stored in a safe manner with open items covered, as well as an emergency water supply. There is a seating area in the backyard with outdoor space for activities. LPA observed one locked shed in the backyard which acts as additional storage. Facility has an internet access device designated for resident use and internet service available. Facility telephone was tested and operational during inspection. Continued 809C... Continued from 809... At approximately 2:00 PM LPA conducted a review of three (3) resident records. All required documentation present. At approximately 2:30 PM LPA conducted review of three (3) staff records. All required documentation present. At approximately 2:45 PM LPA and Caregiver conducted a spot check of medication and medication records. Medication is centrally stored and locked. Maria Salvador Administrator Certificate 7004161740 expires 3/21/2026. All fees are current as of this time. LPA and Administrator discussed facility's Emergency Disaster plan, last updated 2/25. Facility’s last quarterly disaster drill was conducted on 10/24. Updated copies of the following documents are to be submitted to CCL within 30 days of this visit: Liability Insurance LIC500 - Personnel Report LIC308 - Designation of Responsibility LIC400 - Affidavit Regarding Client Cash Resources LIC610D - Emergency Disaster Plan No deficiencies cited. Exit interview conducted with Administrator and a copy of this report was given. Exit interview conducted with Assistant Administrator and a copy of this report was given.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 28, 2025

The state marks this report as 4 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 3. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

20241 state visit · 2 documents
May 29, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not safeguard resident's cash resources

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jill Nakagawa arrived unannounced to deliver findings for complaint 21-AS-20240509122719 at Highlands Care Home IV on 05/29/2024. LPA met with Lolita Pimentel, House Manager. The complaint alleges that Staff do not safeguard resident's cash resources. During the investigation, LPA verified that Client (C1) is able to manage their own cash resources. LPA reviewed records, conducted interviews and made observations. Upon review of the evidence, the Department found that an individual not employed with the facility had access to/possession of C1’s EBT card. Continued 9099-C... Unsubstantiated Continued from 9099.... It was reported to the facility and county officials that C1’s funds were reduced while not in C1’s possession. It was later learned that the alleged abuse occurred by an outside individual and not facility staff who had obtained the EBT card without facility or staff knowledge. Therefore, due to the facility staff not having possession, control or access to the EBT card, and C1 able to manage their own cash resources, the allegation that Staff do not safeguard the resident’s cash resources is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation(s) did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 29, 2024 · control 21-AS-20240509122719
May 29, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jill Nakagawa arrived unannounced to conduct an Annual Inspection and to deliver findings to a complaint investigation. LPA was allowed entry by House Manager Lolita Pimentel. The facility currently provides care for six (6) residents, one (1) is receiving hospice services. Three (3) of the residents were attending Day Program at the time of inspection and the other three (3) were on site. LPA toured the facility with House Manager; facility was found to be clean and at a comfortable temperature with all exits free from obstruction. Residents' bedrooms, common areas, kitchen & food storage areas were inspected. Fire Extinguishers were found to be last charged on 3/28/2024. There was a sufficient supply of both perishable and nonperishable foods as required by Title 22 Regulations. Food stored in the kitchen refrigerator were properly stored as per regulations on this day at the time of the visit. Toxins are stored securely in designated staff quarters and garage. There was a supply of cleaners, hygiene products and paper products available for residents. All resident bedrooms have lighting & appropriate furnishings. LPA tested smoke alarms and were all found to be in working order. Medication is stored in a secured cabinet located in the kitchen along with medication records. A spot medication count was conducted and both records and administration review found to be in order. Hot water measured at 109 degrees F and 111 degrees F in the two (2) bathrooms which is within Title 22 regulations of 105 to 120 degrees F in faucets used by residents. Continued on 809-C Continued from 809..... LPA conducted a review of staff records and confirmed that all staff have updated 1st Aid & CPR Training on file. Upon review of training records, LPA found that 5 out of 5 staff had the required annual training. Last training was conducted in March 2024. 5 out of 5 client files were found to be complete. LPA requested the following documents: LIC500 Resident Roster No deficiencies were found at the time of inspection. No citations issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 29, 2024
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in Solano County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Solano County