Skip to main content
CovelightCare
  • Start your search

    • MapExplore homes by area and what matters to you.
    • Directory
    • Guided search
    • Medi-Cal care homes

    Take a closer look

    • Check a home
    • Compare homes
    • Ask homes for me
  • Step by step

    • All care guidesEvery guide, in the order you’ll need them.
    • 1Step 1: Learn the kinds of care homes
    • 2Step 2: Ways to pay for care
    • 3Step 3: Find homes and check them
    • 4Step 4: Visit, and get the papers before you sign
    • 5Step 5: Move in
    • 6Step 6: The first months, and your rights

    Start with a question

    • Who pays for a care home?
    • Does Medi-Cal pay for a care home?
    • Board and care or assisted living?
    • Leaving the hospital soon?
    • Can a care home make someone leave?
    • Print a visit checklist
    • Check a home’s license
  • Professional tools

    • All professional tools
    • Discharge planning
    • Care management
    • Fiduciaries
    • Elder-law attorneys
    • Public-record worklist

    Care home operators

    • Manage your home’s profileYour home’s information and family inquiries.
    • Claim a home
    • Operator sign in
  • Get to know Covelight

    • How we work
    • Our data & sources
    • What’s new
    • Suggest a correction
    • Contact us
Saved homesGuided search
  • Start your search

    • MapExplore homes by area and what matters to you.
    • Directory
    • Guided search
    • Medi-Cal care homes

    Take a closer look

    • Check a home
    • Compare homes
    • Ask homes for me
  • Step by step

    • All care guidesEvery guide, in the order you’ll need them.
    • 1Step 1: Learn the kinds of care homes
    • 2Step 2: Ways to pay for care
    • 3Step 3: Find homes and check them
    • 4Step 4: Visit, and get the papers before you sign
    • 5Step 5: Move in
    • 6Step 6: The first months, and your rights

    Start with a question

    • Who pays for a care home?
    • Does Medi-Cal pay for a care home?
    • Board and care or assisted living?
    • Leaving the hospital soon?
    • Can a care home make someone leave?
    • Print a visit checklist
    • Check a home’s license
  • Professional tools

    • All professional tools
    • Discharge planning
    • Care management
    • Fiduciaries
    • Elder-law attorneys
    • Public-record worklist

    Care home operators

    • Manage your home’s profileYour home’s information and family inquiries.
    • Claim a home
    • Operator sign in
  • Get to know Covelight

    • How we work
    • Our data & sources
    • What’s new
    • Suggest a correction
    • Contact us
Guided search
Gold Quartz Inn Retirement HomeLicense #37001001 · Covelight Care
Covelight CareGold Quartz Inn Retirement HomeLicense #37001001 · 15 Bryson Drive, Sutter Creek, CA · (209) 267-9155Record printed from covelightcare.com — data as of the dates shown on each item.
Home/California/Amador County/Gold Quartz Inn Retirement Home
Map · 15 Bryson Drive

© Protomaps © OpenStreetMap

Estimated starting rate$3,800/mo

Covelight estimate · likely $3,000–$5,000 · See costs

Check availability

Request a tour

More days
  • AskThe cost, or your own question
  • (209) 267-9155

    From the state licensing record · October 26, 2026

  • assistcare.com↗

Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.

GQ

Call Gold Quartz Inn Retirement Home

Sutter Creek · Licensed for 47

(209) 267-9155

From the state licensing record · October 26, 2026

From the home’s website, assistcare.com:

info@assistcare.com · general email · seen October 27, 2026

or

Let us do the legwork

  • We ask about availability, price and the care you describe.
  • If it’s a fit, you choose whether they call you. Either way, you get every answer.
Check availabilityFree

Mid-size home · Licensed for 47 · Sutter Creek

Gold Quartz Inn Retirement Home

15 Bryson Drive, Sutter Creek, CA 95685 · Licensed since 1998

  • Overview
  • Care
  • Costs
  • Daily life
  • Location
  • State record

Gold Quartz Inn Retirement Home

Overview

Estimated starting rate

$3,800 a month

Covelight estimate · likely $3,000–$5,000 See costs

No openings reported

  • Approved by the state: Wheelchair · HospiceState licensing record · October 26, 2026
  • Licensed for 47: a mid-size care homeThe state license record

Ask this home

Check availability

Request a tour

More days
  • AskThe cost, or your own question

Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.

Care and support

  • Wheelchair
  • Hospiceup to 6 residents

Not on file: dementia and bedridden approvals.

Approved by the state · State licensing record · October 26, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
CAPACITY 47 AGES 60+ AMBULATORY OR NON-AMBULATORY. APPROVED FOR 6 HOSPICE RESIDENTS AT A TIME.

935 - ELDERLY

CDSS record, verbatim · October 26, 2026

Care services

These are the home’s own statements about its day-to-day practice — they are not part of the state licensing record, and the state has not approved or reviewed them.

  • Assisted living

    Reported on assistcare.com · seen October 27, 2026.

  • Help with dressing and grooming

    Reported on assistcare.com · source dated November 28, 2022.

  • Diabetes care

    Reported on AssistedLiving.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Incontinence care

    Reported on AssistedLiving.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Works with hospice

    Reported on assistcare.com · source dated December 1, 2022.

  • Activities of daily living the home lists help withDressing · Grooming · Dressing and grooming · Assistance with daily living · Basic care · Managing medications · and 5 more

    Dressing · Grooming · Dressing and grooming · Assistance with daily living · Basic care — reported on assistcare.com · source dated June 15, 2026.

    Managing medications · Bathing · Housekeeping · Meals — reported on assistcare.com · seen October 27, 2026.

    Assistance with tasks of daily living · Assistance with the tasks of daily living — reported on assistcare.com · source dated December 5, 2022.

  • 24-hour supervision claimed

    Reported on assistcare.com · source dated November 28, 2022.

  • Training topics namedRecognize and respond to each person's individual needs and impairment

    Reported on assistcare.com · source dated December 2, 2022.

  • Secured building entry

    Reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Continuing education cadenceOngoing unspecified

    Reported on assistcare.com · source dated December 2, 2022.

  • Safety and wellness checks

    Reported on assistcare.com · source dated June 15, 2026.

As needs change

  • Medicines

    Who handles medications: Medication dispensing; the staff member or role responsible is not specified.

    assistcare.com · November 28, 2022

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 6 — care may continue at the end of life

    State licensing record · October 26, 2026

We’ll ask for you. Not on file for Gold Quartz Inn Retirement Home: two-person transfers or a lift, who is awake overnight and care if memory loss develops. When we check availability, we ask about these too.

Check availability

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$3,800a month to start

Likely $3,000–$5,000

From 24 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Costs & moving in

  • How care costs are added to the rentTiered levels

    Reported on assistcare.com · source dated June 15, 2026.

  • Rate broken out by room type$7100 – $8850/month (Memory Care – Level 4 and 5 Care) · $5300-$8850/month (Assisted Living – Level 2 through Level 5 Care)We don’t have this home’s dementia-care disclosure. California requires a home that advertises dementia care to describe that care in writing when you ask.

    Reported on assistcare.com · source dated June 15, 2026.

Monthly cost breakdownWith a shared room and basic help · room, care and fees$3,800likely a month
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room

Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.

  • Starting monthly rate$3,800likely $3,000–$5,000

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 24 homes with 7 to 49 beds and similar homes within 33 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (44 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,500one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,500 (133 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $3,000–$5,150
$3,800
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $3,650–$8,350
$6,300
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Rates at nearby homes24 nearby homes publish starting rates of $3,000 to $9,000

$3,000$9,000

EstimateLikely rangeA nearby home’s published starting rate

24 homes like this within 33 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,300–$6,050.

  • Argonaut Care HomeJackson · 2.2 mi · Small home
    $3,500Listed on its own website · argonaut care home 1 shared room · seen October 27, 2026
  • Blissful GardenCameron Park · 20 mi · Mid-size home
    $6,045Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
  • Sunshine Glory Care HomeWilton · 23 mi · Mid-size home
    $3,000Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Dignified Home CareEl Dorado Hills · 23 mi · Small home
    $3,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
  • Joyful Living Residential CareRancho Cordova · 25 mi · Small home
    $4,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
  • Royal GardenEl Dorado Hills · 26 mi · Small home
    $6,000Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Lake View Residential CareEl Dorado Hills · 26 mi · Small home
    $3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living · seen September 9, 2026
  • Vista Hills Senior CareEl Dorado Hills · 27 mi · Small home
    $5,200Listed on its own website · shared room · seen October 27, 2026
  • Elite Elder CareEl Dorado Hills · 27 mi · Small home
    $3,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
  • Dani's Helping HandsFolsom · 27 mi · Small home
    $3,200Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
  • Crown JewelOrangevale · 30 mi · Small home
    $3,000Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Shearwater ResidenceOrangevale · 30 mi · Mid-size home
    $4,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
  • Royal Gardens Elder CareRancho Cordova · 30 mi · Small home
    $5,000Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Gene-Lyn Guest HomeSacramento · 30 mi · Small home
    $4,500Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Renaissance Senior CareOrangevale · 31 mi · Small home
    $6,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living · seen September 9, 2026
  • Ettys' CareOrangevale · 31 mi · Small home
    $4,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Magnolia Elderly Care HomeFair Oaks · 31 mi · Small home
    $6,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living · seen September 9, 2026
  • Splendor Oaks Senior Living #3Fair Oaks · 31 mi · Mid-size home
    $5,000Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
  • All Seasons HialeahFair Oaks · 31 mi · Small home
    $9,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living · seen September 9, 2026
  • Hollister Care HomeCarmichael · 32 mi · Small home
    $4,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
  • Glen Creek Villa II-Res. Care Fac. for the ElderlyOrangevale · 32 mi · Small home
    $4,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
  • Splendor Oaks Senior Living 1Carmichael · 32 mi · Small home
    $3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Siebenthal Care HomeSacramento · 32 mi · Small home
    $3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Love You MomOrangevale · 32 mi · Small home
    $3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 24 homes with 7 to 49 beds and similar homes within 33 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time move-in fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

Ask for the price

An estimate for planning, not a quote. A home sets the price after hearing about the care needed.

Daily life

Rooms, meals, activities and house rules, in the home’s own words. Open any detail to see where it came from.

Rooms & the spaces they will use (17)Private rooms · Building type · Wifi
  • Private rooms

    Reported on assistcare.com · source dated November 28, 2022.

  • Building typeConverted residence

    Reported on assistcare.com · source dated November 28, 2022.

  • Wifi

    Reported on assistcare.com · source dated November 28, 2022.

  • Private bathroom

    Reported on assistcare.com · source dated November 28, 2022.

  • Outdoor spaceWrap-around porch · Rose gardens · Towering oak trees · Garden

    Wrap-around porch · Rose gardens · Towering oak trees — reported on assistcare.com · source dated November 28, 2022.

    Garden — reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Room typesIndividual suite · Studio

    Individual suite — reported on assistcare.com · source dated November 28, 2022.

    Studio — reported on AssistedLiving.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Common areasCoffee and snack bar · Indoor Common Areas

    Coffee and snack bar — reported on assistcare.com · source dated November 28, 2022.

    Indoor Common Areas — reported on AssistedLiving.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Rooms come furnished

    Reported on assistcare.com · source dated December 5, 2022.

  • LaundryDone by staff

    Reported on assistcare.com · source dated June 15, 2026.

  • Wifi in resident rooms

    Reported on assistcare.com · source dated November 28, 2022.

  • Visitor parking

    Reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Air conditioning in the room

    Reported on assistcare.com · source dated November 28, 2022.

  • AmenitiesArt Studio and activity room · Beauty Salon · Art studio · Activity room · Coffee and snack bar

    Art Studio and activity room · Beauty Salon — reported on assistcare.com · source dated December 2, 2022.

    Art studio · Activity room · Coffee and snack bar — reported on assistcare.com · source dated November 28, 2022.

  • Cable or satellite TV

    Reported on assistcare.com · source dated November 28, 2022.

  • Housekeeping

    Reported on assistcare.com · source dated June 15, 2026.

  • Telephone in the room

    Reported on assistcare.com · source dated November 28, 2022.

  • Salon or barber

    Reported on assistcare.com · source dated November 28, 2022.

Meals, preferences & familiar food (14)Meals are cooked in the home's own kitchen · Special diets supported · Meals provided per day
  • Meals are cooked in the home's own kitchen

    Reported on assistcare.com · source dated December 1, 2022.

  • Special diets supportedVegetarian · Vegan · Diabetic · Celiac · Low Salt · Low Carbohydrate · and 3 more

    Vegetarian · Vegan · Diabetic · Celiac · Low Salt · Low Carbohydrate · Keto · Gluten free · Lactose free — reported on assistcare.com · source dated December 1, 2022.

  • Meals provided per day3

    Reported on assistcare.com · source dated November 28, 2022.

  • Vegetarian or vegan optionsVegetarian · Vegan

    Reported on assistcare.com · source dated December 1, 2022.

  • Snacks available

    Reported on assistcare.com · source dated November 28, 2022.

  • Follows physician-ordered diets

    Reported on assistcare.com · source dated December 1, 2022.

  • All-day or flexible dining

    Reported on assistcare.com · source dated December 1, 2022.

  • Dishes the home names, on a published menu or in its own description of its foodInfused water with berries, lemon, mint, or other seasonal fruits · Cream of broccoli soup (may include) · French onion soup (may include) · Shepherd's pie · Fresh green beans · Hot spiced apples · and 78 more

    Infused water with berries, lemon, mint, or other seasonal fruits · Cream of broccoli soup · French onion soup · Shepherd's pie · Fresh green beans · Hot spiced apples · Lasagna · Roasted green beans · Garlic bread · Fruit cobbler · Rosemary pork roast · Onions · Broccoli in cheese sauce · Roll · Lemon ice box pie · Chicken pot pie · Caesar salad · Dinner roll · Ice cream sundae · Roast beef with gravy · Mashed potatoes · Green beans · Spice cake with cream cheese frosting · White chicken chili · Fresh green salad · Snickerdoodle · Pork roast · Sweet potatoes · Fresh vegetables · Cornbread · Pumpkin cake · Orange-glazed chicken · Steamed rice · Broccoli florets · Bread pudding · Chicken alfredo fettuccine · Lemon cake · Sloppy Joe · Sweet potato fries · Coleslaw · Caramel baked apple · Panko-crusted fish · Au Gratin potatoes · Zucchini with tomatoes · Seasonal cake · Milk · Juices · Hot tea · Coffee · Poached eggs · Fresh fruit · Toast · Seasonal quiche · Egg casseroles featuring seasonal produce · Pancakes or waffles · Yogurt · Made-to-order eggs · Bacon or sausage · Hot cocoa · Infused water · Cheese and crackers · Pudding · Home-made cookies · Chicken noodle soup · Vegetable soup · Cream of broccoli · French Onion · Shepherds pie, with fresh green beans and hot spiced apples · Lasagna, with roasted green beans, garlic bread and fruit cobbler · Rosemary Pork Roast, with onions and broccoli in a cheese sauce, a roll and lemon ice box pie · Chicken pot pie, served with Caesar salad, dinner roll and an ice cream sundae · Roast Beef with gravy, mashed potatoes, green beans, spice cake with cream cheese frosting. · White chicken chili, served with fresh green salad, dinner roll and a snickerdoodle · Pork roast, with fluffy sweet potatoes, fresh vegetables, cornbread and pumpkin cake · Orange glazed chicken, served with steamed rice, broccoli florets, a dinner roll and bread pudding · Chicken alfredo fettuccine, served with fresh vegetables, garlic bread and lemon cake · Sloppy Joe, with sweet potato fries, coleslaw and a caramel baked apple · Panko crusted fish, served with Au Gratin potatoes, zucchini with tomatoes, a dinner roll and seasonal cake · Poached eggs, served with fresh fruit and toast · Seasonal Quiche, served with hashbrowns and fresh fruit · Egg Casseroles featuring seasonal produce, served with toast and fresh fruit · Pancakes or Waffles, served with fresh fruit and yogurt · Made to order eggs, choice of bacon or sausage, hashbrowns and toast — reported on assistcare.com · source dated December 1, 2022.

    Seasonal menus — reported on assistcare.com · source dated November 28, 2022.

  • Meals served in the room

    Reported on assistcare.com · source dated November 28, 2022.

  • Family may eat with the resident

    Reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Meals provided

    Reported on assistcare.com · source dated December 5, 2022.

  • Professional chef

    Reported on assistcare.com · source dated November 28, 2022.

  • Places to eat on siteDining room

    Reported on assistcare.com · source dated November 28, 2022.

  • Dining atmosphereHome-cooked meals

    Reported on assistcare.com · seen October 27, 2026.

Activities & the rhythm of a day (8)Activity types offered · Activity calendar published · Activities on weekends
  • Activity types offeredRecreational activities · Enriching activities · Trips to a flower farm · Shopping trips · Parades · Picnics in the park · and 18 more

    Recreational activities — reported on assistcare.com · source dated June 15, 2026.

    Enriching activities — reported on assistcare.com · seen October 27, 2026.

    Trips to a flower farm · Shopping trips · Parades · Picnics in the park · Football · Art · Fitness classes · Learning · Flower Farm · Picnic in the park · Football Sunday · Seasonal Art Projects · Balloon Toss · Arts and Crafts · Morning Walks — reported on assistcare.com · source dated December 1, 2022.

    Walking friends · Movie nights · Strength and stretching classes · Live concerts · Game nights · Exercise classes — reported on assistcare.com · source dated November 28, 2022.

    Activities On-site — reported on AssistedLiving.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Activity calendar published

    Reported on assistcare.com · source dated November 28, 2022.

  • Activities on weekends

    Reported on assistcare.com · source dated December 1, 2022.

  • Exercise or fitness programStrength and stretch classes · Stretch and strengthening classes · Exercise classes · Strength and stretching classes

    Strength and stretch classes — reported on assistcare.com · source dated June 15, 2026.

    Stretch and strengthening classes · Exercise classes — reported on assistcare.com · source dated December 1, 2022.

    Strength and stretching classes — reported on assistcare.com · source dated November 28, 2022.

  • Trips outside the home

    Reported on assistcare.com · source dated December 1, 2022.

  • Religious services at the home

    Reported on assistcare.com · source dated December 2, 2022.

  • Religious services off site

    Reported on AssistedLiving.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Therapy animal visits

    Reported on assistcare.com · source dated December 1, 2022.

Pets, routines & independence (2)Pet types allowed · Residents' council
  • Pet types allowedSmall dog · Cat

    Reported on assistcare.com · source dated December 4, 2022.

  • Residents' council

    Reported on assistcare.com · source dated June 15, 2026.

Visiting & staying involved (7)How often care conferences happen · Transport for group outings · Tour scheduling link
  • How often care conferences happenMonthlyMonthly Family-Resident Council

    Reported on assistcare.com · source dated November 28, 2022.

  • Transport for group outings

    Reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Tour scheduling link

    Reported on assistcare.com · source dated June 15, 2026.

    Open on the website ↗
  • Neighborhood or area namedHills above Sutter Creek, in the heart of Amador County

    Reported on assistcare.com · source dated November 28, 2022.

  • Transportation

    Reported on assistcare.com · source dated June 15, 2026.

  • Contact form

    Reported on assistcare.com · source dated June 15, 2026.

    Open on the website ↗
  • SettingRural

    Reported on assistcare.com · source dated November 28, 2022.

About the home (1)Brand or trade name
  • Brand or trade nameGold Quartz Inn Senior Retirement Home

    Reported on assistcare.com · seen October 27, 2026.

Where it is

15 Bryson Drive, Sutter Creek, CA 95685Address from the public record · October 26, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

  1. 1Sutter Amador HospitalHospital · General acute care, on the state’s list3.1 mi

Straight-line distances; check the drive or the walk. Hospital: the nearest general acute care hospital on the state’s list (CDPH, September 16, 2026).

Open directions ↗

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

CDSS public record, read October 26, 2026 · License #37001001 · See the state’s own record ↗

The last 36 months — 10 of 19 documents

Complaint outcomes in these 36 months, in the state’s words: 1 “Substantiated”, 1 “Unsubstantiated”, 1 “Unfounded” and 1 not transcribed yet.

20265 state visits · 6 documents

Sep 24, 2026Facility evaluation reportCase Management - DeficienciesDeficiency page: Type B

Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies

On 09/24/26, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Viarella made an unannounced case management visit to this facility to cite for a deficiency observed related to complaint investigation number 27-AS-20260819111921 that was delivered earlier today. LPA identified herself upon arrival stated the purpose of the visit, and asked to meet with the designated facility administrator/Executive Director (ED), Loreen Hickman. Hickman was not scheduled to work today and this LPA met with the Assistant Executive Director/Designee, Brandee Butler. LPA observed that a personal rights violation occurred when facility staff disposed of a resident's (R1's) personal belongings without their consent. Staff knew that the items belonged to R1 and there was no documentation proving that these items were donated, they therefore should have consulted R1 before disposing of them. This deficiency has been cited on the LIC 809D page. According to the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, no other deficiencies were cited during today's visit, a copy of this report was provided and an exit interview conducted with Brandee Butter,the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 24, 2026

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87468.1 · Plan of correction due date: Oct 30, 2026

87468.1 Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities (a) Residents...personal rights: (12) To wear their own clothes; to keep and use their own personal possessions... The Licensee did not ensure the above regulation was met when: Based on interviews with S1, S2, and S3, staff knew that the books belonged to R1. Based on record review, no one checked to see if these items had been donated or if R1 wanted them back before disposing of them. This posed a potential threat to the health, safety and personal rights of residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 24, 2026

Plan of correction: Designee stated that they will conduct an All-Staff on personal rights. They will let CCL know if it will be condcuted by an Ombudsman, but it will be condcuted by October 31st. A copy of the agenda and signature sheets along wih the name of the presenter will be emailed to CCL Attention Kimberly Viarella at: CCLASCPSacramentoSouthRO@dss.ca.gov

Sep 24, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

We haven’t transcribed this report yet. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 4, 2026Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are not following proper infection control protocols with residents in care. Facility is not reporting infectious conditions as required.

On 08/04/26, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Viarella made an unannounced visit to this facility to open an investigation into the above allegations. LPA identified herself upon arrival, stated the purpose of the visit, and asked to meet with the Designated Facility Administrator. LPA met with Executive Director (ED) Loreen Hickman and a brief interview followed. LPA requested the following documents: Staff roster for all care staff, medication technicians, and housekeeping Schedules for May, June, and July 2026 Medical reports/test results, and Medication Records for R1 and R2 for June and July 2026 LPA reviewed medical documents for Resident R1. On 05/12/26, a home health nurse reported that R1 had a rash and suspected scabies. The ED stated that the home health nurse reported this information to the doctor and an appointment was made for R1 with a dermatologist on 05/21/26. During that visit, Substantiated a specific diagnosis was not determined and a biopsy was conducted. LPA reviewed the biopsy report dated 05/21/26 which still did not confirm or rule out a diagnosis of scabies. LPA reviewed the Electronic Medication Administration Record for R1 and learned the following. R1 was treated with Ivermectin and Permethrin on 05/29/26 and again on 06/05/26. The ED stated that an incident was not sent to Community Care Licensing (CCL) regarding the possible diagnosis and treatment for scabies. They also stated that although they notified R1's responsible party regarding R1 potentially having scabies. LPA contacted the the responsible party who they were not notified. R1 had been complaining about the rash they had, and their responsible party called to make the appointment with a dermatologist. Home health initially reported their suspicions for R1 potentially having scabies on 05/12/26 and they were not quarantined and kept separate from other residents in care. The ED stated that they thought the home health nurse would contact the family and the PCP so the facility did not. R1 did not receive a medical evaluation until 9 days later on 05/21/26 when the responsible party took R1 due to their complaints regarding their rash. The evaluation was inconclusive and a biopsy was performed. The results remained inconclusive - they neither confirmed nor ruled out scabies. R1 was not quarantined. R1 received treatment 8 days later on 05/29/26 and again on 06/05/26. R1 was quarantined from 05/29/26 until 06/02/26. During that time period, R1 was relocated to another room so their room could be deep cleaned. Although it was not confirmed the rash was from something contagious, it still was a possibility and infection protocols should have been implemented. According to the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, the facility is responsible for notifying CCL, the resident's primary care physician, and their responsible party whenever there is a change of condition or an unusual incident. Based on a review of records and interviews with the responsible party and the ED, the department found the allegations, "Staff are not following proper infection control protocols with residents in care," and "Facility is not reporting infectious conditions as required," SUBSTANTIATED. These deficiencies have been cited on the LIC 9099D page. No other deficiencies were observed or cited during today's visit, a copy of this report was provided and an exit interview was conducted with Hickman.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 4, 2026 · control 27-AS-20260727164010

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87470 · Plan of correction due date: Sep 16, 2026

CCR 87470 Infection Control The above regulation was not met as evidenced by: Based on a review of medical records and interviews with the ED and the responsible party for R1, the facility was aware of a potentially infectious condition and did not implement infection control protocols. This posed a potential threat to the health, safety and personal rights of residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 4, 2026

Plan of correction: The ED will be bringing in an outside service to conduct an training on infectious diseases/conditions with all staff. ED will send the agenda with the facilitor's contact information and a signature sheet for all participants.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87211(a)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Aug 31, 2026

(a) Each licensee shall furnish to the licensing...(1) A written report shall be submitted to the licensing agency and to the person responsible for the resident within seven days...specified in (A) through (D) below... The above regulation was not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews with the ED and the responsible party for R1, the facility did not send an LIC 624 to CCL, it did not notify the PCP and it did not contact the resposble party for R1. This posed a potential threat to the health, safety and personal rights of residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 4, 2026

Plan of correction: ED will have a training on reporting requirements with all staff. ED will send the agenda with the facilitor's contact information and a signature sheet for all participants.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87465(a)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Aug 31, 2026

87465 Incidental Medical and Dental Care (a)...shall be developed by each ...(1) The licensee shall arrange, or assist in arranging, for medical and dental care appropriate to the conditions and needs of residents. The above regulation was not met as evideced by: Based on interviews with the ED, the responsible party for R1, and a a review of medical records, the facility waiting 9 days after hone health notified them that R1 might have scabies. This posed a potential threat to the health, safety and personal rights of resdients in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 4, 2026
May 28, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility toilet is in disrepair Facility staff did not provide resident's records to authorized representative Facility staff do not safeguard resident's belongings Facility staff not providing a comfortable environment for the resident Facility did not ensure that resident reappraisals were conducted

On 05/28/2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Pang Lee arrived unannounced at the facility to conduct a complaint visit. LPA Lee met with Assistant Administrator (AA) Brandee Butler and explained the purpose of the visit. The purpose of today’s visit was to deliver the complaint findings regarding the above allegations. Per AA Butler, Administrator Loreen Hickman was off duty today. The current census was 34. A brief interview was conducted with AA Butler. It was alleged that the facility toilets were in disrepair. The investigation included observations and interviews with staff and residents. During LPA Lee’s facility visit on 03/03/2026, LPA Lee inspected nine residents’ toilets, including Resident 1’s (R1) toilet in room 102, and observed that all toilets were in good repair and functioning properly. During LPA Lee’s facility visit on 04/23/2026, LPA Lee inspected five additional residents’ toilets, including R1’s toilet, and again observed that all toilets were in good repair and functioning properly. Unsubstantiated Interviews were conducted with six out of six staff members, all of whom stated that the residents’ toilets were in good repair. Staff members also denied instructing residents to dispose of used toilet paper in trash bins instead of flushing it. Additionally, twelve out of twelve residents interviewed reported that the toilets were not in disrepair. Furthermore, eleven out of eleven residents stated that facility staff had not instructed them to dispose of used toilet paper in trash bins. Based on the investigation, it was further learned that toilets may occasionally clog depending on usage; however, maintenance staff are readily available to address and unclog toilets to restore proper function. Based on the observations and interviews conducted, LPA Lee was unable to corroborate the allegation. It was alleged that facility staff did not provide resident’s records to authorized representatives. The investigation included interviews with the Administrator Hickman and a review of records. On 02/01/2026, it was learned that the resident’s authorized representative requested Resident 1 (R1)’s records, specifically pendant call logs. It was further noted that the facility’s call system retains only 16 pages of call history. On 02/05/2026, the authorized representative requested additional documents, including all communication logs that are posted on R1’s refrigerator. On 02/11/2026, Administrator Hickman explained to the authorized representative the facility’s protocol for releasing records and provided the authorized representative with an Authorization for Use and Disclosure of Protected Health Information form to state that authorized representative can obtain R1’s records. It was also learned that the Power of Attorney documentation that the authorized representative provided to the facility was limited to financial matters and did not include access to medical records. The facility contacted and discussed this matter with the authorized representative. On 02/13/2026, the authorized representative submitted the signed Authorization for Use and Disclosure of Protected Health Information form, and it was learned that the authorized representatives were 4th in line. On 02/16/2026, authorized representative sends signed authorization for use and disclosure of protected health information form. On 02/26/2026, the authorized representative requested additional and all records and documents related to R1’s stay at the facility from date of admission 11/05/2024 to 03/18/2026. On 03/03/2026, all requested documents were collected and taken to the corporate office for copying, and the authorized representative was notified that the copies were ready to pick up. The authorized representative confirmed via email that they would retrieve the documents. Based on the record review, there was ongoing communication between the facility and the authorized representative regarding the requested documents and the requested records were provided to the authorized representative. Therefore, based on the records review and interviews conducted, LPA Lee was unable to corroborate the allegation. CONTINUED LIC 9099-C It was alleged that facility staff do not safeguard residents’ belongings. The investigation included observations and interviews with facility staff and residents in care. During the investigation, it was learned that Resident 1’s (R1’s) pillowcase and mask were not returned after being washed that week. Based on observations made during facility visits conducted on 03/03/2026 and 04/23/2026, LPA Lee observed in the laundry room that residents’ clothing was labeled with their name and initials. Resident bedding and sheets were folded, bagged, and prepared for delivery to residents after laundering. Interviews with six out of six facility staff revealed that residents’ belongings are labeled with the resident’s name and initials, and any unlabeled items were placed in the lost and found area. The laundry area was organized, and a system was in place for processing residents’ laundry. LPA Lee also observed a designated area in room 113 for residents’ lost items, where residents and family members could access and look for unidentified belongings that did not have names labeled on them. Interviews with 12 out of 12 residents indicated that they had no concerns regarding the facility’s laundry services or staff safeguarding residents’ belongings. R1 stated that the pillowcase and mask had been returned and has no concerns anymore. Based on observations and interviews conducted, LPA Lee was unable to corroborate the allegation. It was alleged that facility staff did not provide a comfortable environment for the residents. The investigation included observations and interviews with facility staff and residents. Based on observations made during facility visits conducted on 03/03/2026 and 04/23/2026, LPA Lee did not observe facility staff making residents feel uncomfortable. During both visits, facility staff were observed assisting residents with their activities of daily living (ADLs), and no mistreatment of residents by staff was observed. Interviews conducted with six out of six facility staff revealed that they had not witnessed any staff mistreating residents or making residents feel uncomfortable. Interviews with 10 out of 12 residents indicated that they had no concerns regarding staff not providing a comfortable environment. Additionally, the 10 residents stated that they felt safe living in the facility and had no concerns regarding facility staff. Based on observations and interviews conducted, LPA Lee was unable to corroborate the allegation. It was alleged that the facility did not ensure resident reappraisals were conducted. Based on the investigation, including records review and interviews, it was learned that Resident 1 (R1) moved into the facility on 11/05/2024. A pre-admission questionnaire and LIC 603 Pre-Placement Appraisal were completed on 09/09/2024. CONTINUED LIC 9099-C An Augmented Standard Assessment/Care Plan for R1 was later completed on 01/24/2025 and signed by both Administrator Hickman and R1’s Responsible Party (RP). Additionally, a LIC 625 Appraisal/Needs and Services Plan was completed on 01/21/2026; however, the document was not signed either by either the Administrator Hickman or RP. According to an interview with Administrator Hickman, R1’s RP took the LIC 625 document dated on 01/21/2026 for review and signature but did not return the completed form. Administrator Hickman further stated that the RP provided the facility with a 30-day notice on 02/18/2026, and R1 then moved out of the facility on 03/18/2026; therefore, the form was never returned signed. Based on an interview with the RP, it was confirmed that facility staff did provide them with a document for review and signature. However, the RP stated that R1 was hospitalized at the time, and they did not have the opportunity to review and sign the document and that they could not recall which specific document was provided and were unable to locate the paperwork. Based on the records reviewed and interviews conducted, it could not be confirmed whether the document provided to the RP was the resident’s reappraisal, as the RP was unable to recall which form had been provided; therefore, LPA Lee was unable to corroborate the allegation. The investigation revealed the preponderance of evidence standards have not been met; therefore, the above allegations are found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the complaint allegations are unsubstantiated means that although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation(s)occurred. An exit interview was conducted with AA Butler, and a copy of the LIC 9099 report was provided to the facility. According to Administrator Hickman, via an email on 05/27/2026, when a resident’s medication entry contains staff initials, it indicates that the medication was administered. If the staff initials are circled, it indicates that the resident refused the medication. Administrator Hickman further stated that if there are no staff initials and the entry is left blank, it means the medication was not administered to the residents. During today’s visit on 05/28/2026, LPA Lee reviewed the 10 dates and times on the QuickMAR that were left blank with AA Butler, and AA Butler acknowledged that there were no staff initials or documented explanations indicating why the medications were not administered to R1 on those dates and times and was not able to provide LPA Lee any reasons. Therefore, based on the blank entries observed in the QuickMAR records, the facility was unable to demonstrate that the medications were administered as prescribed, LPA Lee was able to corroborate the allegation that the facility did not ensure residents received their medications timely. As a result of this investigation, the Department finds the allegation to be SUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the complaint is substantiated means that the allegation is valid because the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met. An exit interview was conducted with AA Butler, and a copy of the LIC 9099 reports, LIC 9099-D page, and Appeals rights were provided to the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 28, 2026 · control 27-AS-20260226152218

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87465(a)(4) · Plan of correction due date: Jun 11, 2026

87465 (a)(4) Incidental Medical and Dental Care (a)A plan for incidental medical and dental care shall be developed by each facility. The plan shall encourage routine medical and dental care and provide for assistance in obtaining such care, by compliance with the following: (4)The licensee shall assist residents with self-administered medications as needed. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews and record reviews, the licensee did not comply with the regulation cited. Facility did not ensure medications were administered to R1 as prescribed. This poses immediate health, safety, and personal rights risks to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 28, 2026

Plan of correction: AA Butler/facility agrees to conduct staff training regarding medication administration and medication record-keeping by the POC due date 06/11/2026 end of day 5:00 PM. Administrator agrees to email LPA Lee a copy of the training materials used for the training and staff sign-in sheet for attending the training.

Mar 3, 2026Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 03/03/2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Pang Lee arrived at the facility to conduct an unannounced annual inspection. LPA Lee met with Executive Director (ED) Loreen Hickman and explained the purpose of the visit. The current census is 34. LPA Lee inspected the physical plant including but not limited to the common areas, kitchen, dining area, resident bedrooms, resident bathrooms, laundry room, facility storage, staff office, activity rooms and medication room to ensure compliance with Title 22 regulations. LPA Lee observed the facility to be free of odor, clean and in good repair. LPA Lee observed bedrooms to be properly furnished with appropriate bedding and lighting. LPA Lee inspected nine residents’ toilets and observed that all were in good repair and functioning properly. Hot water temperature was measured in two residents’ bathroom sink and was at 112.4 and 116.1 degrees Fahrenheit which is within the required regulation of 105 to 120 degrees Fahrenheit. The laundry room was also toured. LPA Lee observed residents’ clothing labeled with their initials. Resident bedding and sheets were observed folded and bagged, ready to be delivered to residents after washing and drying. The laundry area was organized, with a system in place for processing residents’ laundry. An area designated for residents’ lost items was also observed. LPA observed facility’s activity calendar posted and sufficient equipment and supplies to meet activity program needs of residents in care. LPA Lee also observed five residents participating in the activity for the day. LPA Lee toured the kitchen and observed sufficient seven-day non-perishable and two-day perishable food supplies. The facility’s exhaust hood was last serviced on 03/21/2025. The smoke and carbon monoxide detectors are in compliance with fire safety. CONTINUED LIC 809-C The fire extinguisher is located throughout the facility and was last serviced on 11/18/2025. The last fire drill was conducted on 12/03/2025. LPA Lee observed the facility has a has a public telephone in each resident’s room and in the medication room for residents use and the facility has the required posters posted. Facility thermostat was observed at 75 degrees Fahrenheit, which is within the required regulation of 68 to 85 degrees Fahrenheit. LPA Lee observed toxins and sharp knives kept locked and inaccessible to residents. LPA Lee checked medication storage and found medication to be locked away and inaccessible to residents. The first aid kit was checked and contained the required components. LPA Lee, along with the medication technician staff, reviewed five residents’ medications using the facility’s All Care Systems, which logs residents’ medications and documents when medications are administered. A review of the five residents’ medication records was conducted, and no discrepancies were observed. During this inspection, LPA conducted an audit of facility files, five resident files, and three staff files for regulatory compliance and they were complete. The following documents will be emailed to LPA Lee at pang.lee@dss.ca.gov by end of day 03/10/2026: (1) LIC 308 Designation of Administrative Responsibility (2) Copy of Administrator Certificate (4) LIC 610 Current Emergency Disaster Plan (5) Proof of Current Liability Insurance (6) LIC 500 Current Personnel Report As a result of this annual visit, the facility is in compliance with Title 22 Regulation. An exit interview was conducted with ED Hickman and a copy of the LIC 809 reports was provided to the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 3, 2026
Feb 11, 2026Facility evaluation reportCase Management - DeficienciesDeficiency page: Type B

Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies

On 2/11/26 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Gould conducted an unannounced Case Management deficiencies inspection to address deficiency observed while conducting a walk through of the facility as part of a complaint investigation. LPA inspected the facility canned goods supply and emergency food supply. LPA observed several dented cans retained for resident consumption that should have been returned to the vendor or disposed as department regulations prohibit the retention of dented canned goods to ensure the food supply is protected from contamination. Per the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, the following deficiency is cited during today's inspection. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report and appeal rights were provided to the administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 11, 2026

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87555(b)(8) · Plan of correction due date: Feb 20, 2026

General Food Service Requirements: All food shall be of good quality. Commercial foods shall be approved by appropriate federal, state and local authorities. Food in damaged containers shall not be accepted, used or retained. This requirement was not met as evidenced by LPA observations of dented canned goods retained in canned goods supply and emergency food supply which poses a potential health, safety and personal rights risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 11, 2026

Plan of correction: Administrator agrees to review regulation with dietary and maintenance staff to ensure canned goods are returned to vendor and not retained or used.

20251 state visit · 1 document

Feb 20, 2025Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 2/20/25, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Arvin Villanueva conducted an unannounced annual required visit, with the use of the CARE Inspection Tool. LPA met with Assistant Executive Director, Brandee Butler, and explained the purpose of today’s visit. Adminstrator Loreen Hickman was not available during this visit. The facility is currently licensed to serve 47 ambulatory and non-ambulatory elderly residents. The facility is approved for 5 hospice residents. LPA and Brandee inspected the facility’s physical plant including but not limited to the kitchen, dining room, resident bedrooms, resident bathrooms, laundry room, parlor area, common TV area, activity area and outside of the facility. The facility is a two-story building located in a residential neighborhood. There were no bodies of water were observed at this time. Entrance, exits and hallways were observed to be clear of obstructions. LPA observed an evacuation chair located near the entrance door by the reception area. Facility has one elevator and was observed to be operational at this time. The facility common areas, including the activity room, dinning hall, parlor/living room, and hallways, were observed to be organized and free from debris. LPA inspected 5 resident apartments. LPA observed beds and bedding supplies were in good condition, adequate lighting was provided, and sufficient storage for the resident's personal belongings. Bathrooms were operational and adequately supplied including with grab bars and non-skid flooring. Hot water in 5 of 5 resident bathroom faucets were measured between 108 and 113 degree Fahrenheit. Smoke detectors and carbon monoxide were observed in each of the inspected apartments. The kitchen was inspected, and was observed to be clean and free of clutter. Facility maintains a sufficient 2-day perishable and 7-day non-perishable food. Room temperature was maintained in the facility at 71 degrees F in the hallway and 72 degree F in one resident apartments. Two fire extinguisher were inspected and both were serviced on 11/26/24. Medications were observed to be stored in the locked medication room near the the reception and office area. {1 of 2} Medications were observed to be locked and inaccessible to residents in care. Sharp objects, poisonous substances and other dangerous items were observed to be inaccessible to residents in care. During this visit, LPA conducted an audit of facility files, 7 resident files, and 5 staff files for regulatory compliance. The 7 resident files reviewed contained to documents including updated admission agreements, medical assessments, and needs and services plan as required. 5 of 5 staff were noted to have criminal background clearances and associated to this facility. The 5 staff files reviewed contained documents including health screening, TB results, current first aid, and initial and ongoing training. Facility conducts quarterly fire drills and last drill was conducted in November 2024. LPA requested an updated copy of LIC 308, LIC 500, and liability insurance certificate to be sent to the Department by 2/21/25. At this time, no citations are being cited. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was provided. {2 of 2}the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 20, 2025

20243 state visits · 3 documents

Sep 10, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Facility did not provide responsbile party with former resident's records.

On 9/10/24 at 4:24pm, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Arvin Villanueva arrived at this facility unannounced to conduct a follow up complaint visit and deliver finding regarding the allegation noted above. LPA met with Loreen Hickman, Administrator and stated the purpose of this visit. The investigation involved conducting interviews and reviewing records from a prior complaint (control # 27-AS-20230816155055), alongside other pertinent documents, to address the allegation that Gold Quartz Inn Retirement Home (GQI) did not provide the Responsible Party (RP) with the records of the former resident (R1). Initially, the RP requested records on 6/13/23, prior to R1's death. RP requested comprehensive documentation since R1's admission on 11/1/22. On 6/16/23, the facility provided some documents to the RP; however, several pages, including those from the Hospice binder, were missing or incomplete. In response to subsequent requests from the RP on 6/25/23, and 6/28/23, which highlighted the missing pages and documents, the facility communicated further updates. Unfounded On 628/23, the facility informed the RP that the missing pages from the hospice documents were not available due to being provided in incomplete form by the hospice provider. Following R1's death, the RP, also the Power of Attorney (POA), formally requested a complete set of records on 8/11/23. GQI responded by stating that while they would provide some documents, they could not release all requested records due to regulatory and contractual limitations. A regulatory and legal review revealed that the Department of Social Services indicated that a POA’s authority terminates upon the resident's death. Consequently, the facility was not obligated to release resident records after their death. GQI’s position was that no specific law required them to release all requested records after the resident’s death, though they did agree to provide payment records and relevant care documents. The facility had provided the majority of the requested documents, excluding those from the hospice, which were property of the hospice provider and not directly controlled by GQI. Administrator Loreen Hickman and Licensee Ronald Regan confirmed that the facility had furnished all available documents and addressed any missing pages from their own records. The remaining documents were under the hospice provider's control. An appeal of the facility’s actions was reviewed, and the Department concluded that GQI’s response adhered to regulatory requirements. The facility had complied with providing all available records and clarified that some documents were beyond their control. In conclusion, the investigation found no evidence that the facility did not provide the requested records beyond their control or contrary to regulatory obligations. Therefore, the allegation is deemed UNFOUNDED. Note that a finding that is unfounded means that the allegation is false, could not have happened, and/or is without a reasonable basis. Based on today’s visit, no deficiencies are being cited. After discussing the findings, Administrator needed to leave the facility and assigned staff on duty (S1) to sign this report on behalf of the Administrator, An exit interview was conducted with S1 and a copy of this report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 10, 2024 · control 27-AS-20240312154531
Apr 16, 2024Facility evaluation reportCase Management - DeficienciesDeficiency page: Type B

Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Christina Valerio arrived unannounced to the facility to conduct a case management - deficiencies visit. LPA met with Administrator Loreen Hickman, and explained the purpose of the visit. On 09/26/2023, The Regional Office substantiated allegations for complaint 27-AS-20230920142634. The Licensee appealed the decision. The appeal was granted, and the citation with the related $500 civil penalty was dismissed. However, a violation still exists for 22 CCR § 87468.2(a)(4) for staff failure to ensure R1’s wheelchair lock in the transport van was secured resulting in R1 and the wheelchair falling to the floor. LPA toured the facility and observed no immediate health or safety concerns. LPA requested and obtained a copy of the current staff roster. Per California Code of Regulations (CCR) - Title 22, deficiencies are being cited on the attached LIC 809-D page. Appeal Rights were provided. An exit interview was held, a copy of the report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 16, 2024

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87468.2(a)(4) · Plan of correction due date: Apr 23, 2024

87468.2 Additional Personal Rights of Residents...(a)In additionto...Section 87468.1... residents... shall have all of the following personal rights: (4)To care, supervision, and services that meet their individual needs...This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on records review and interviews, the licensee neglected to ensure R1's needs were met by staff, which resulted in R1 falling to the floor while in a moving vehicle. This poses a potential health and personal rights risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 16, 2024

Plan of correction: Licensee to submit copies of in-service training for Transportation Procedures conducted for 2023 and 2024 for all staff by POC due date.

Feb 6, 2024Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 2/6/24, at 10:30am, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Arvin Villanueva conducted an unannounced annual required visit, with the use of the CARE Inspection Tool. LPA met with Loreen Hickman, Executive Director (ED) and explained the purpose of today’s visit. The facility is currently licensed to serve 47 ambulatory and non-ambulatory elderly residents. The facility is approved for 6 hospice residents. At 11am, LPA inspected the facility’s physical plant including but not limited to the kitchen, dining room, resident bedrooms, resident bathrooms, laundry room, parlor area, common TV area, activity area and outside of the facility to ensure compliance with Title 22 regulations. The facility is a two-story structure located in a residential neighborhood. There were no bodies of water on the premises. Entrance, exits and hallways were observed to be clear of obstructions. LPA inspected 4 resident apartments. LPA observed beds and bedding supplies were in good condition, adequate lighting was provided, and sufficient storage for the resident's personal belongings. Bed linens, comforters, and bath towels were adequately stocked during the visit. Bathrooms were operational and adequately supplied including with grab bars and non-skid flooring. LPA observed the facility to be furnished at the time of the visit. Storage areas for personal hygiene, cleaning supplies, toxins, and sharps objects were locked and not accessible to residents in care. The kitchen was inspected, and was observed to be clean and free of clutter. Facility maintains a sufficient 2-day perishable and 7-day non-perishable food. Room temperature was maintained in the facility at 74 degrees F in the hallway and 72 degree F in one resident apartments. Water temperature in two resident bathrooms were measured at 114 degrees F. Two fire extinguisher were inspected and both were serviced on 11/21/23. Smoke detectors and carbon monoxide were observed in each of the inspected apartments and found to be operable during this visit. {Con't to LIC809-C} {Con't from LIC809} Medication storage area was observed to be locked and inaccessible to residents in care. First aid kit was observed to have adequate supplies and accessible to staff. The facility maintains for each resident Centrally Stored Medication, Destruction Record and PRN Log. LPA observed the facility's infection control practices. LPA observed screening protocols for visitors, staff, and residents, and sanitizing stations in common areas and restrooms. LPA observed personal rights, resident council and complaint information posted. Facility has appropriate internet access available for resident use. LPA observed facility’s activity calendar and sufficient equipment and supplies to meet activity program needs of residents in care. During this inspection, LPA conducted an audit of facility files, 5 resident files, and 5 staff files for regulatory compliance. All staff noted on the facility staff roster have criminal background clearances and associated to this facility. Resident files reviewed contained all required contents including updated admission agreements, medical assessments, and updated appraisal forms as required. Staff files reviewed contained all required contents including health screening, TB results, current first aid, and initial and ongoing required trainings. LPA reviewed facility’s disaster plan to ensure regulatory compliance. Facility conducts quarterly fire drills. LPA requested an updated copy of LIC 308, LIC 500, and liability insurance certificate. Per California Code of Regulations (Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8), no deficiencies were observed during this visit. An exit interview was held with Loreen Hickman, and a copy of this report was provided to the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 6, 2024
Earlier years2021 to 2023 · 9 documents

20233 state visits · 4 documents

Sep 26, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility did not provide responsible party with former resident's records.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Christina Valerio arrived unannounced to deliver complaint investigation findings. LPA met with Administrator Loreen Hickman, and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA Valerio conducted the investigation, which consisted of interviews and record reviews. The Department has determined the following as it relates to the above aforementioned allegation. According to facility records, Resident 1 (R1) was admitted to the facility in late months of year 2022. R1 was involved in an accident in April of 2023. For reference, please see case management visit dated 05/04/23. On 07/22/23, R1 passed away at the facility. According to Records Review, R1's had a District Power of Attorney (POA) on file. On 08/11/2023, POA/Responsible Party for R1 requested records from Gold Quartz Inn Retirement Home. Continues on LIC 9099 - C... Substantiated Continued from LIC 9099 POA/RP requested a full and complete copy of R1's resident and business office files. On 08/14/23, Executive Managing Director, Ronald Regan, responded to R1's POA/RP. Ronald's response included the following: "The reference request for designated records from GQI, which is not a health care provider.... Therefore, your request for blanket resident information is denied since the GQI has no clear legal requirement for RCFE's to release records of a deceased resident. Cal.Code Regs Tit.22 § 87868 states that the admission agreement between the resident and the facility is automatically terminated by the resident's death, and that no liability or debt accrues after that date. This regulation could be interpreted to mean that [R1] does not have authority to seek copies of documents after the resident's death, as the agreement between the resident and the facility has ended. Based upon the foregoing, GQI may elect to not provide records. However, in an effort to settle the matter, GQI will provide resident payment records and relevant resident care file documents. A designed list of records will be provided on upon your agreement. The list of documents will include the number of pages for the response which will require a payment of $0.25/page of copies that can be emailed to your attention." LPA Valerio interviewed staff on 08/23/23. According to an interview with Administrator Loreen, Administrator Loreen stated that if anyone were to request records from staff, the staff will inform Loreen and she would take care of the request. Administrator Loreen stated if she is not available to preform the task, Fleta Herndon, may be available. According to an interview with Licensee Ronald Regan, Licensee Ronald is aware that R1 requested documents; however, he wants the POA/RP to request the documents in the right way. Licensee stated he would gladly send the documents if properly requested. According to an interview with the POA/RP, they have not received requested documents as of 09/25/2023. According to Health and Safety Code Section 1569.269, A resident of a RCFE has the right "To confidential treatment of their records and personal information and to approve their release, except as authorized by law." Per Title 22 regulations, 87506, "the licensee...shall reveal or make available confidential information only upon the resident's written consent or that of his designated representative and Original records or photographic reproductions shall be retained for a minimum of three (3) years following termination of service to the resident. Per California Code of Regulations (CCR) Title 22, deficiencies are being cited on the attached LIC 809 -D. Failure to correct deficiencies may result in civil penalties. Appeal Rights Provided. An exit interview was held, a copy of the report was provided to Administrator Loreen Hickman.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 26, 2023 · control 27-AS-20230816155055

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87405(d)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Oct 10, 2023

87405 Administrator - Qualifications and Duties (d) The administrator shall have the qualifications specified in Sections 87405(d)(1) through (7)... (2) Knowledge of and ability to conform to the applicable laws, rules and regulations. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on records review and interviews, R1's POA/RP records request has not been completed, therefore, the licensee and administrator did not conform to applicable laws, rules, and regulations. This poses a potential health, safety, and personal rights risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 26, 2023

Plan of correction: The Licensee shall provide LPA Valerio a written statement acknowledging review of Health and Safety Code and Title 22 regulations and the facilities plan to ensure the POA/RP receives all documents requested by POC due date.

Sep 26, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not secure resident's wheelchair appropriately in vehicle resulting in the resident tipping over sustaining injuries during a vehicle collision

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Christina Valerio arrived to the facility unannounced to conduct a 10 Day Visit, complaint investigation, and deliver complaint findings. LPA met with Administrator Loreen Hickman, explained the purpose of the visit. On 05/04/23, LPA Valerio and Licensing Program Manager (LPM) Richardson conducted a case management visit at the facility due to receiving notification of an incident that occured on 04/27/23. During the visit, LPA obtained documentation, interviewed staff, and observed staff preforming their procedures on how to secure a wheelchair in the van. After review of files and staff interviews, the facility was cited California Code of Regulations (CCR), Title 22, Section 87707(a)(2) for not ensuring all staff were properly trained on Van Procedures and Transportation. Continues on LIC 9099 - C Substantiated ...Continued from LIC 9099 According to the incident report submitted to the Regional Office, on 04/27/23 at 11:15 AM, Resident 1 (R1) was being transported to an appointment with Staff 1 (S1) and Staff 2 (S2). S1 was driving the facility van while S2 was sitting in the back of the van behind R1. S1 made a turn going 5 miles per hour. While turning, R1 fell while still in their wheelchair, landing on the floor and on their right side of their body. S2 assisted by elevating R1's head while on the vehicle floor. S2 performed verbal checks and assisted R1 back into the wheel chair after the fall and secured R1 to continue transportation to R1 appointment. R1 was observed to have a skin tear. S2 performed first aid. R1 was on the way to the doctor's office. R1's responsible party and primary care provider was notified. The doctor's office re-bandaged R1's injury and R1 will be provided home health follow up care. On 09/25/23, LPA reviewed a Traffic Crash Report from the Department of California Highway Patrol. According to the summary/case report, Staff 1 was driving the facility van, southbound on SR-49 at the intersection with SR-88 stopped at the stop limit line. As the traffic signal turning green, Staff 1 began to make the left turn and accelerated into the intersection at the stated speed of approximately 10-15 miles per house. At that speed, the wheelchair began to overturn to the right with [R1] still in the chair. Due to S1's unsafe turning movement, [R1] wheelchair fully overturned to the right allowing both [R1] and the wheelchair to fall, both striking the floor of the vehicle. Following the crash, [S1] and [S2] assisted [R1] back to an upright position, provided minor first aid, and continued to their original destination. According to an interview with the administrator, Administrator Loreen confirmed that S1 and S2 did not report the incident to CHP as they were already heading to R1's doctor appointment. Facility records confirm that S1 was not the individual to secure the wheelchair. S2 and S3 assisted R1 in the van. S1 and S2 did not double check to make sure the wheelchair was locked into a secure position. LPA reviewed pictures submitted by an outside agency of R1. Pictured is only the elbow to the middle forearm. The entire elbow and forearm region had evidence of bruising. This is evident by black, red, and purple colored skin. There is a skin tear roughly about 1 and 1/2 inch in diameter. Where there is a skin tear, it is bright red and black blood clots. Continues on LIC 9099 - C, Page 3... ...Continued from LIC 9099 - C Another picture was provided to the RO on 09/20/23. The picture shows Resident 1 drinking a drink while sitting in a chair. The resident has bruises on the face located under the eye, in the middle of the cheek, and below the ear. The resident also has a large bruise starting from proximal area of the forearm to the distal area of the forearm. The resident is show to have a large bandage wrapped around her forearm. Based on interviews and records review, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegations are found to be SUBSTANTIATED. Per California Code of Regulations (CCR), Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8, deficiencies are being cited on the attached LIC 9099 - D. Failure to correct deficiencies may result in civil penalties. Appeal Rights Provided. An exit interview was held, and a copy of the report was provided. Licensee was informed that an immediate civil penalty of $500 is issued in addition to citation due to injury related to violation of Section 1569.312(e). At the time of the complaint visit, the issuance of a Civil Penalty was still being determined and the licensee was informed that a civil penalty might be assessed based on Health and Safety Code § 1569.49(f). This report was amended to reflect the assessment of the civil penalty and possible civil penalty might be assessed based on Health and Safety Code § 1569.49(f).the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 26, 2023 · control 27-AS-20230920142634

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87468.2(a)(4) · Plan of correction due date: Oct 10, 2023

87468.2 Additional Personal Rights of Residents (a)In addition to.. Section 87468.1,.. residents...shall have all of the following: (4)To care, supervision, and services that meet their individual needs ...delivered by staff that are sufficient in numbers, qualifications, and competency... This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on records review and interviews, the licensee neglected to ensure R1's needs were met by staff, which resulted in R1 sustaining injuries. This poses a potential health and personal rights risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 26, 2023

Plan of correction: Licensee stated they conducted and completed training on Transportation Procedures during May and June of 2023. Licensee stated facility staff will continue refresher training every 6 month/as needed. By the POC due date, Licensee will submit a statement of their training plan/procedures.

May 4, 2023Facility evaluation reportCase Management - IncidentDeficiency pages: Type A, Type B

Type of visit: Case Management - Incident

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Christina Valerio and Licensing Program Manager (LPM) Stephen Richardson arrived to the facility unannounced to follow up on an incident that occurred on 04/27/2023. LPA met with facility staff and Senior Executive Director Fleta Herndon, and explained the purpose of the visit. The incident report stated that on 04/27/23 at 11:15 AM, Resident 1 (R1) was being transported to an appointment with Staff 1 (S1) and Staff 2 (S2). S1 was driving the facility van while S2 was sitting in the back of the van behind R1. S1 made a turn going 5 miles per hour. While turning, R1 fell while still in their wheelchair, landing on the the floor and on their right side of their body. S2 assisted by elevating R1's head while on the vehicle floor. S2 performed verbal checks and assisted R1 back into the wheel chair after the fall and secured R1 to continue transportation to R1 appointment. R1 was observed to have a skin tear. S2 performed first aid. R1 was on the way to the doctor's office. R1's responsible party and primary care provider was notified. The doctor's office re-bandaged R1's injury and R1 will be provided home health follow up care. The facility reported the incident to LPA on 05/01/23 and sent in an incident report on 05/03/23. During a phone conversation with Administrator Loreen, Administrator stated they are conducting an internal investigation and will send copies of the staff statements to LPA. Per Administrator, the van was assessed by the maintenance worker. The van is in working condition and was used to transport residents. LPA requested facility documentation related to the incident. Facility staff provided doctor visit documentation. LPA requested staff statements. Licensee Ron informed Fleta that he will not release the statements to LPA based on the guidance provided by their attorneys. The attorneys were to review the statements and give approval to release the statements. LPA provided Technical Assistance to Fleta to inform and remind Licensee Ron of Title 22 87755 (c), which states, "The licensing agency shall have the authority to inspect, audit, and copy resident or facility records upon demand during normal business hours. Records may be removed if necessary for copying. Removal of records shall be subject to the requirements in Sections 87412(f), 87506(d), and 87508(b)." Continues from LIC 809... At 11:12 AM, LPA Valerio and LPM Richardson received an email composed of the statements from staff that were present before and after the incident. Staff statements were reviewed. On 05/02/23, the regional office was sent a picture of R1's injuries. The picture was reviewed and details were documented. Based on review, the picture indicates an approximate 1 and 1/2 inch skin tear with evidence of ecchymosis "bruising" on the entirety of the upper forearm. According to staff interviews, staff have not seen the injury recently due to home health taking care of the skin tear. Staff stated the resident has attended follow-up appointments and will continue to receive follow up care from home health. LPA requested personnel files and staff training records. LPA observed 3 staff files. LPA and LPM did not observe staff in-service training pertaining to how to properly secure wheelchairs into the facility van or topics related to operating the facility van. During facility records review, the licensee did not ensure 3 out 3 staff files reviewed had up-to-date training. S1 received 13 hours of training in 2022 and 0.75 hours of training in 2023. S2 had 0 hours of training received for 2022 and 2023. S3 received 14 hours of training in 2022 and 0 hours of training in 2023. This poses a potential health and safety risk to residents in care. Per California Code of Regulations (CCR), Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8, deficiencies were observed and citations can be found on LIC 809 - D. Failure to correct the deficiencies may result in civil penalties. An exit interview was held with Senior Executive Director Fleta Herndon, and a copy of the report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 4, 2023

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87707(a)(2) · Plan of correction due date: May 5, 2023

87707 Training Requirements...(a) Licensees.. shall...meet the following training requirements: (2) Direct care staff shall complete at least eight hours of in-service training...within 12 months of working in the facility and in each succeeding 12-month period... This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on observations, records review, and interviews, the licensee did not ensure staff received updated training on how to properly secured residents with a wheelchair in the facility van. This resulted in a resident getting injured during transport, which poses an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 4, 2023

Plan of correction: Licensee stated all facility staff will receive in-service training. Licensee to send LPA a copy of in-service training with staff signatures acknowledging understanding of "Procedures to Transport a Wheelchair Resident in Gold Quartz Van"

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR87411(c) · Plan of correction due date: Jun 1, 2023

87411 Personnel Requirements - General (c) All RCFE staff who assist residents with personal activities of daily living shall receive initial and annual training as specified in Health and Safety Code sections 1569.625 and 1569.69 Based on records review and interviews, the licensee did not ensure 3 out of 3 staff files reviews received required annual training. This poses a potential health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 4, 2023

Plan of correction: Licensee stated the administrator will go through all staff files to determine which files are out of date.

Jan 26, 2023Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Christina Valerio arrived unannounced to conduct an annual visit. LPA met with facility staff, and explained the purpose of the visit. Upon arrival, LPA noticed construction work in the front entrance of the building. LPA took pictures for reference. The facility is a two story building. In order to enter the facility, a person needs to walk across a bridge walkway. According to staff, the facility started working on the new walkway a few weeks ago. The new and temporary ramp was installed this week. LPA was not made aware of the repairs. LPA requested the building permit. Licensee Ron R. came to the facility around noon and gave LPA the building permits and construction blue print. A technical advisory was given regarding notifying CCL of any repairs or modification done to the facility. Title 87305 Alterations to Existing Building or New Facilities was discussed with Licensee and Executive Director (ED) Fleta Herndon. LPA toured the facility to ensure compliance of title 22 regulations. LPA toured the facility with facility staff. Hot water was measured at 108.7*F in two bathrooms. The facility common areas, including the activity room, dinning hall, day room, and hallways, were observed to be organized and free from debris. The elevator inspection is up to date. Fire extinguishers are up to date and fully charged. After the tour, LPA was met by Licensee Ron and ED Fleta. LPA discussed findings of the tour with ED and Licensee. The ED designated the lead staff on shift to sign off on the report. During the tour, LPA observed room 113. This is a empty resident room on the bottom floor. LPA observed construction items, bed frames, unused mattresses, and other tool items in the room. LPA heard voices in the bathroom. According to interviews, this room is utilized by staff to give showers to residents due to the walk in shower. Licensee was informed of the situation and had hazardous items removed from the room into another vacant room. Continues on LIC 809 - C... Page 1 of 3 Continued from LIC 809 LPA was at the facility for majority of the day. During this time, there were no planned activities for the residents. According to staff, today is the activities director day off. LPA observed a staff member telling a resident there were no activities for the day. LPA requested the following copies: LIC 500, LIC 308, Liability Insurance, LIC 90999 - Current Facility sketch with current emergency exits, LIC 610E Current Disaster Plan Per California Code of Regulations (CCR) - Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8, deficiencies are being cited. Appeal rights were provided. An exit interview was held with staff, and a copy of the report provided. LPA to send copies of the report to ED Fleta Herndon and Assistant Administrator Loreen Hickman. .the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 26, 2023

The state marks this report as 5 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 4. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

20224 state visits · 4 documents

Dec 28, 2022Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility is violating resident's personal rights Facility did not complete an updated needs and service plan Facility is sharing information with unauthorized representative Facility is not meeting food service requirements

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Christina Valerio arrived to the facility unannounced to deliver complaint investigation findings. LPA met with facility lead staff, and explained the purpose of the visit. The department has determined the following as it relates to the allegations: Facility is violating resident's personal rights, Facility did not complete an updated needs and service plan, Facility is sharing information with unauthorized representative, Facility is not meeting food service requirements According to interviews with staff, staff have never observed or admitted to violating any resident's personal rights. According to staff, they continue to provide care and ensure their needs are met as best as they can. One staff stated, "If someone were to ask for help, I would help them. If I was getting paid or not, I am here for the residents." According to resident interviews, the staff are nice, treat the resident's good, and the facility is a good place. According to facility observations, LPA did not observe any personal rights violation on 10/04/22, 10/20/22, 11/18/22, or 12/28/22. Unsubstantiated LPA reviewed facility records for resident's on hospice. Resident 1 had an assessment completed on 10/11/2017. According to records, an updated assessment was done in 2021. For 2022, a care plan was re-established on 03/03/22 and 04/27/22. Resident 1 also had an updated LIC 602 with a date of 03/10/2022. According to staff interviews, care plan assessments are completed in their QUICK MAR system. According to an interview with an outside agency, the facility listed a patient (resident 2) on hospice with dementia; however, the resident does not have dementia. According to a previous staff, R2 has always been observed to be coherent and should not have been diagnosed with dementia. According to records review, the facility had a care plan updated on 03/24/22 and 08/02/22. According to an interview with the assistant administrator, a nurse diagnosis R2 with dementia during a visit. The assistant administrator asked for proof regarding the diagnosis to ensure the care plan is accurate. LPA Valerio interviewed residents, staff, and an outside agency regarding staff sharing resident information with unauthorized representatives. According to two interviews, it was heard that staff are taking videos of residents on their cell phone and then laughing about it. One staff stated, "I know we have used snap chat filters to have it for fun during activities. We always ask for consent. We post them in our activities room and/or for Facebook. We have all residents sign a consent form." LPA reviewed resident records and confirmed that each resident has a signed consent for photographs/videos to be taken for the purpose of activities, newsletters, and family. According to staff, a sign was created because staff were discussing who left to the hospital with another resident. The sign posted stated, "We are not to share any personal information on the resident, yourself or any other person in the community." According to an interview with R2, R2 stated there was an issue with R2's family member for about a week. R2 stated R2 is involved in treatment meetings and has appointed a new power of attorney. LPA interviewed staff regarding the facility's food service. Staff stated there is an ample amount of food, they try to make everything in house, they give options to resident's, they will offer seconds to resident, they have a dietitian make the menu, and they adjust the menu based on resident wants, supply, and diet. Other staff stated that depending on the cook staff, there might be a change in presentation for food. One cook staff only cooks frozen foods and another staff cooks home-made meals. Continues on LIC 9099- C... page 2 of 3 According to another staff, the staff will order food and lead management will adjust the order based on budget. There are times where the facility does not get everything that was initially ordered. According to a family member, the food smelled so good, they wanted to stay for dinner. Based on observations of meal times and the facility menu, the facility offers balanced and appetizing food items. According to an interview with a resident, resident stated, "they have a variety of food, such as ground beef, pulled pork, and chicken." Based on all the information collected by the Department there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the allegation occurred, therefore this allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Due to the above noted information, although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation(s) did or did not occur, and therefore the allegations are unsubstantiated. Per California Code of Regulations (CCRs) - Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8, no deficiencies cited. Exit interview was held and a copy of report was given to facility lead staff. Page 3 of 3.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 28, 2022 · control 27-AS-20220929140325
Nov 17, 2022Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility is not providing residents transportation to medical appointments. Facility staff member did not assist resident with a brief change in a timely manner resulting in resident sitting in feces for an extended period of time. Facility staffing is not sufficient to meet the needs of the residents.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Victoria Brown arrived unannounced to investigate the above mentioned allegations on 11/17/22 at 12:30p. LPA met with Amber Warren, PM Supervisor and stated the purpose of the visit. LPA interviewed resident #1 (R1) - (R7) and Staff #1 (S1) - (S6). Regarding allegation, "Facility is not providing residents transportation to medical appointments." LPA toured the facility van with S3 and took pictures of the ramp inside and the step stool. LPA attempted to lift the ramp which was extremely heavy. LPA observed the stool to contain duck tape to hold the legs together. S3 is currently unable to lift the ramp to assist residents onto and off the van which in turn does not allow the residents to be transported. S3 is the only transportation driver for the facility van at this time. The ramp is not broken it is too heavy for S3 to lift due to medical reasons and possibly a second transport staff would be needed to lift the ramp to assist residents on and off the van for appointments. LPA obtained information that the facility is utlizing the van from next door which is not licensed by Community Care Licensing (CCL) to assist, however the lift on that van is broken. Substantiated LPA observed in the Plan of Operation submitted to Community Care Licensing (CCL) upon Licensure that the facility under Basic Services Provision or arrangement for transportation to local functions such as church or doctor appointments within a near by radius will be provided. And under Transportation Transportation is provided by several means...and residents special need in the facility van. Based on interviews, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met. Regarding allegation, "Facility staff member did not assist resident with a brief change in a timely manner resulting in resident sitting in feces for an extended period of time." LPA conducted interviews of (S1-S6) and (R1) which revealed that residents are not being changed timely for incontinence. This personal rights violation would be residents bedding not being changed with the incontinence care leaving brown spots on the bed and leaving the resident in urine and/or feces for an extended period of time. LPA observed in the Plan of Operation submitted to Community Care Licensing (CCL) upon Licensure that the facility under Basic Health Services facility will provide observation and assistance with personal needs and bedside care needs. Based on interviews, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met. Regarding allegation, "Facility staffing is not sufficient to meet the needs of the residents" LPA conducted interviews of (S1-S6) and (R1-R7) which revealed conflicting information. LPA obtained information that the facility is cross training/working staff. In addition, LPA received information that care staff are used to transport food to the independent apartments next door on a daily basis for all meals. There is at this time 26 residents and 1 caregiver to each floor with 1 Medication Technician. Specifically, on days when 1 staff does not work there is only 1 caregiver and MT 1 of which is used to deliver meals to the independent apartments next door during their shift which leaves an insufficient number of staff for the supervision of residents. Based on interviews the facility is in need of additional staffing. Based on interviews, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met. Based on interviews and observations, the preponderance of evidence standards has been met; therefore, the above allegation(s) is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the complaint allegation is Substantiated means that the allegation is valid because the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met. Per California Code of Regulations (CCRs) - Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8, the following deficiencies are being cited on the attached 9099D during this visit. If any of the cited deficiencies are not corrected by the noted due dates; civil penalties may be assessed. The Administrator was provided a copy of their rights (LIC9058) and their signature on this form acknowledges receipt of these rights. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 17, 2022 · control 27-AS-20221109113829

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87208(a)(8) · Plan of correction due date: Nov 18, 2022

Plan of Operation Transportation arrangements for persons served who do not have independent arrangements. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Observation Staff is unable to utilize the ramp to assist residents onto and off the van while using a wheelchair Based on interviews, the licensee did not ensure van is properly equipped for the safety of staff and residents This posed an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 17, 2022

Plan of correction: Licensee shall submit a plan on how to accommodate ambulatory and non ambulatory residents who need transportation for appointments as stated in Plan of Operation. Please fax to (916) 263-4744 by POC due date.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87625(b)(1-3) · Plan of correction due date: Nov 18, 2022

Managed Incontinence In addition to Section 87611, General Requirements for Allowable Health Conditions, the licensee shall be responsible for the following: Ensuring that residents who can benefit from scheduled toileting are assisted or reminded to go to the bathroom at regular intervals rather than being diapered. Ensuring that incontinent residents are checked during those periods of time when they are known to be incontinent, including during the night. Ensuring that incontinent residents are kept clean and dry and that the facility remains free of odors from incontinence. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Interviews that staff is not assisting residents with incontinence timely Based on interviews, the licensee did not ensure staff is assisting residents with incontinence This posed an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 17, 2022

Plan of correction: Licensee shall submit a plan on conducting an in-service for staff regarding caregiveing procedures and scheduled incontinence care for all residents. Please fax to (916) 263-4744 by POC due date.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87411(a) · Plan of correction due date: Nov 18, 2022

Personnel Requirements - General Facility personnel shall at all times be sufficient in numbers, and competent to provide the services necessary to meet resident needs. In facilities licensed for sixteen or more, sufficient support staff shall be employed to ensure provision of personal assistance and care as required in Section 87608, Postural Supports. Additional staff shall be employed as necessary to perform office work, cooking, house cleaning, laundering, and maintenance of buildings, equipment and grounds. The licensing agency may require any facility to provide additional staff whenever it determines through documentation that the needs of the particular residents, the extent of services provided, or the physical arrangements of the facility require such additional staff for the provision of adequate services. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Interviews staff is insufficient in numbers to provide care and supervision Based on interviews, the licensee did not ensure sufficient staffing who are used to asssist independent apartments next door This posed an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 17, 2022

Plan of correction: Licensee shall submit a plan on how to accommodate their licensed RCFE and the independent apartments next door. Please fax to (916) 263-4744 by POC due date.

Oct 20, 2022Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility did not ensure medication destruction record is maintained Facility did not provide supervision of residents narcotic medication

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Christina Valerio arrived unannounced to deliver complaint investigation findings. LPA met with facility staff, and explained the purpose of the visit. The department has concluded the following as it relates to the above mentioned allegations. The individual designated to sign was medication technician lead, Brandee Smith. On 06/09/2022, the department received an incident report from the facility stating it was discovered on 06/05/2022 that narcotic medications (3 pills) were found to be missing from the facility. On the day the pills were discovered to be missing, 3 staff were called to confirm the medication count. According to interviews, staff stated that they do not know where the medications went or if anyone had taken the medications. Staff statement reveal that not all shifts completed a medication count for the narcotic medications. Another staff statement revealed that the facility pre-pours medication for the oncoming shift so staff are unable to attest to which medication was poured. Continues on LIC 9099 - C... Substantiated Continued from LIC 9099 On 07/07/2022, the department received an incident report from the facility stating it was discovered on 06/30/2022 that narcotic medication (entire bottle) were found to be missing from the facility. After an internal investigation, facility records reveal that narcotic medication sheet was deleted from the facility excel system. This document would be able to show the narcotic count for the pill bottle. The facility admitted that the medications and medication document were not found. Since the incident, the facility implemented a triple check system for narcotic medications and had medication staff undergo additional training through Relias. Based on interviews and observation, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegations are found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations (Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8) are being cited on the attached LIC-9099D. Failure to correct the deficiency may result in civil penalties. Appeal rights were provided. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of the report was left at the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 20, 2022 · control 27-AS-20220720142919

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87465(e) · Plan of correction due date: Nov 21, 2022

87465 Incidental Medical and Dental Care (e) For every prescription and nonprescription PRN medication for which the licensee provides assistance there shall be a signed, dated written order from a physician, on a prescription blank, maintained in the residents file, and a label on the medication.. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on records review and interview, 1 resident medication records were missing from the facility,which poses a potential health and safety risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 20, 2022

Plan of correction: Licensee stated a new system will be implemented by POC due date. The licensee will save back up files on a USB drives at the start of each month. Licensee to send proof of medication back up sheets to LPA via fax.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87465(h)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Nov 21, 2022

87465 Incidental Medical and Dental Care (h) The following requirements shall apply to medications which are centrally stored: (2) Centrally stored medicines shall be kept in a safe and locked place...This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interviews, the facility did not ensure medication for resident 1 and resident 2 were kept safe and locked away, which caused the medications to come up missing. This poses a potential health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 20, 2022

Plan of correction: Licensee stated they have implemented a triple check system. Licensee to send copies of count sheet for October and November to LPA by POC due date.

The state marks this report as 6 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 4. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

Jan 10, 2022Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Christina Valerio arrived at this facility unannounced to conduct an annual inspection visit. LPA Valerio was screened for COVID-19 symptoms with temperature prior to being allowed inside the facility. Administrator confirmed staff and residents have not displayed any signs or symptoms of COVID-19 in the last 10 days. The physical plant was toured inside and outside to ensure the safety of the residents and compliance with Title 22 regulations. There were no observed health or safety concerns. LPA conducted the infection control domain tool. LPA Valerio discussed the recent PINs and mandates with Administrator and staff. The facility has a plan to have all eligible staff boosted by the February 1st, 2022 deadline. The facility has one central entry point and has implemented screening and sign in procedures at the front of the home. LPA observed the facility to have COVID-19 informational, hand washing signs, and sign in sheet posted at the front door and throughout the facility. The facility has a designated infection control lead. The facility is able to designated and dedicated a COVID-19 bedroom and bathroom if needed. LPA observed the temperature inside the facility was measured at 72*F, which is within the required range of 68 degrees F and 85 degrees F. The hot water was measured at 114.1*F, which is not less than 105 degrees F (40.5 degrees C) and not more than 120 degrees F (48.8 degrees C) as per Title 22 regulations. Facility has nonperishable foods for a minimum of one week and fresh perishable foods for a minimum of two days. LPA observed the centrally stored medications area and cleaning supplies to be locked and inaccessible to clients. Resident rooms was sanitary and had the required furniture and furnishings. The facility common areas were clean and furnished. Fire extinguishers was up to date with last check on 11/26/2021. Per California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8, no deficiencies were observed during this visit. An exit interview was held, and a copy of the report was left at the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 10, 2022

20211 state visit · 1 document

Nov 10, 2021Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Christina Valerio arrived unannounced to conduct an annual inspection. LPA met with facility staff Loreen Hickman, stated the purpose of today’s visit, and was allowed entry after being screening for COVID-19 symptoms with temperature taken. Staff confirmed residents and staff have not had any signs or symptoms of COVID-19 in the last 10 day. The physical plant was toured inside and outside to ensure the safety of the residents and compliance with Title 22 regulations. LPA also conducted the infection control domain tool. The facility submitted a LIC 808 mitigation plan. LPA observed the facility to have a first aid kit, hand washing signage, and COVID - 19 informational signage posted at the front door and throughout the facility. The facility is able to designate and dedicated a Covid-19 bedroom and bathroom if needed. Common touch surfaces are cleaned after each use. LPA observed the temperature inside the facility was measured at 74*F which is within the required range of 68 degrees F (20 degrees C) and 85 degrees F (30 degrees C), or in areas of extreme heat the maximum shall be 30 degrees F (16.6 degrees C) less than the outside temperature. The hot water was measured at 110.1 *F, which is not less than 105 degrees F (40.5 degrees C) and not more than 120 degrees F (48.8 degrees C) as per Title 22 regulations. Facility has food supplies: nonperishable foods for a minimum of one week and fresh perishable foods for a minimum of two days. The centrally stored medications area to be locked and inaccessible to clients. LPA Valerio observed a pull alarm system, fire extinguisher(s) with last check on 11/20/2020, smoke and carbon monoxide detectors, central heating and air in the facility. Per the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8, no deficiencies observed or cited. Exit interview held, copy of report given to Administrator Machellee Alllison.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 10, 2021

35 of 47 beds were occupied at the August 4, 2026 state visit — a count on that day, not an opening.

License holder

Amador Residential Partners Inc., licensed since 1998.

The state’s totals for this licenseSince 1998, as the state’s facility page counts them
State visits on file
23
Total complaints
9
Substantiated allegations
11
Type A citations
1
Type B citations
7

These are the state’s own totals for this license since 1998, per CDSS records. The state counts them apart from the documents above, and they can differ from what those documents show; the documents say what each visit found. One complaint can contain several allegations.

Compare with homes the same size
This homeTypical
Type A citations10
Type B citations71
Substantiated allegations112
Total complaints96

“Typical” is the statewide median for licensed homes this size. It does not adjust for years licensed, and older licenses have had more visits and reports. The median is across the 1,354 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record. The figures compared are the state’s totals, not the documents.

What the state’s words mean
Routine visita visit the state records as “Required” — a scheduled visit, not one made in answer to a complaintSubstantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents stand in their place.

Open CDSS facility search ↗Report a record errorOperate this home? Respond or correct, free →
Frequently asked questions

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Gold Quartz Inn Retirement Home

Is Gold Quartz Inn Retirement Home licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

How many residents is Gold Quartz Inn Retirement Home licensed for?

47 residents — a mid-size home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

Has Gold Quartz Inn Retirement Home been cited?

1 Type A and 7 Type B citations since 1998, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. Those records count 23 state visits over the same years.

Is Gold Quartz Inn Retirement Home still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of November 11, 2026.

What does Gold Quartz Inn Retirement Home cost?

$3,800 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,000–$5,000. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 24 homes with 7 to 49 beds and similar homes within 33 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Gold Quartz Inn Retirement Home take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Amador Residential Partners Inc., per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Sutter Amador Hospital is 3.1 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Gold Quartz Inn Retirement Home keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 6 residents, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

Gold Quartz Inn Retirement Home license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “GOLD QUARTZ INN RETIREMENT HOME”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #37001001. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • Licensed for 47 residents — a mid-size home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • Licensed to Amador Residential Partners Inc., per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • First licensed in 1998, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • 23 state inspection visits since 1998, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • 1 Type A and 7 Type B citations on file since 1998, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. The same records count 23 state visits in that period.
  • 9 complaints and 11 substantiated allegations on file since 1998, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is September 24, 2026, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Nearby

Other homes nearby

Licensed homes near this one in Amador County, most information on file first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

  • Map

    Jackson · 2.2 mi

    Argonaut Care Home

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Starting rate

    $3,500 a month to start

    Listed by the home on its own website · October 27, 2026

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Dementia: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record
  • Map

    Jackson · 2.8 mi

    Jackson Hills Assisted Living

    Large community · licensed for 70

    Estimated starting rate

    $4,850 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $3,750–$6,150

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Dementia: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record
  • Map

    Jackson · 1.7 mi

    Argonaut Care Home 3

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $4,900 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $4,000–$6,000

    On the state record

    • Dementia: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record
  • Map

    Jackson · 2.7 mi

    Amador Residential Care Facility

    Mid-size home · licensed for 49

    Estimated starting rate

    $3,950 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $3,100–$5,200

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record

Street maps © Protomaps · © OpenStreetMap

Explore Amador County ↗

Do you run this home?

Add your photos, care details, and contact information. Your public profile is free.

Claim this home
Visiting in person? Print a visit sheetHow we source information
CallAsk this home
GQ

Call Gold Quartz Inn Retirement Home

Sutter Creek · Licensed for 47

(209) 267-9155

From the state licensing record · October 26, 2026

From the home’s website, assistcare.com:

info@assistcare.com · general email · seen October 27, 2026

or

Let us do the legwork

  • We ask about availability, price and the care you describe.
  • If it’s a fit, you choose whether they call you. Either way, you get every answer.
Check availabilityFree

Ask Gold Quartz Inn Retirement Home

Check availability

Request a tour

More days
  • AskThe cost, or your own question

Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.

Covelight Care

A free directory of every licensed care home in California, built from CDSS public records.

Find your next step

Find a homeSaved homesHelp me chooseCheck a home

Make sense of care

Care guidesMedi-Cal & careYour rightsHow we workAbout this site

Work with Covelight

For professionalsFor home operatorsSuggest a correctionDevelopersContact us

© 2026 Covelight Care LLC. Homes never pay to appear or rank higher.

Covelight Care is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the sources named on this page.

3104 O St Unit #1023, Sacramento, CA 95816

PrivacyTermsText messages