Mid-size home · Licensed for 22 · Red Bluff
Gilmore Place
70 Gilmore Road, Red Bluff, CA 96080Licensed since 2016
Overview
No openings reported
- Approved by the state: WheelchairState licensing record · October 26, 2026
- Licensed for 22: a mid-size care homeThe state license record
Ask this home
Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.
Care and support
- Wheelchairup to 6 residents
Not on file: dementia, hospice and bedridden approvals.
Approved by the state · State licensing record · October 26, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.
Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER.22 AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 6 MAY BE NON-AMBULATORY.
935 - ELDERLY
CDSS record, verbatim · October 26, 2026
As needs change
We’ll ask for you. Not on file for Gilmore Place: two-person transfers or a lift, who is awake overnight, help with medicines, staying through hospice and care if memory loss develops. When we check availability, we ask about these too.
Check availabilityWhat it costs here
Covelight estimate
$4,350a month to start
Likely $3,450–$5,750
From 15 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file
Monthly cost breakdownWith a shared room and basic help · room, care and fees$4,350likely a month
Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.
Starting monthly rate$4,350likely $3,450–$5,750
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 15 homes with 7 to 49 beds and similar homes within 38 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600
Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (44 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).
One-time move-in fee$2,500one time · likely $0–$4,000
Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,500 (133 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.
- Likely monthly totalLikely $3,450–$5,900
- $4,350
- First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,150–$9,000
- $6,850
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
- MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
- Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
- Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
- SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
- VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
- Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
Rates at nearby homes15 nearby homes publish starting rates of $2,995 to $5,558
15 homes like this within 38 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,050–$5,400.
- Golden Oaks Senior LivingRedding · 27 mi · Mid-size home$4,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Spring Hills Assisted LivingRedding · 28 mi · Small home$5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Sunset Comfort CareRedding · 30 mi · Small home$4,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Hallmark NorthRedding · 30 mi · Small home$5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Westside Assisted LivingRedding · 30 mi · Small home$5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Redbud Care HomeRedding · 30 mi · Mid-size home$5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Westhaven Assisted LivingOrland · 31 mi · Mid-size home$2,995Listed on its own website · shared room · seen October 27, 2026
- The Neighborhoods at WesthavenOrland · 31 mi · Mid-size home$2,995Listed on its own website · shared room · seen October 27, 2026
- Life PasticheRedding · 31 mi · Small home$4,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Townsend HouseChico · 35 mi · Mid-size home$3,750Listed on Seniorly · assisted living studio · seen September 9, 2026
- Almond Blossom Assisted Living-WestChico · 36 mi · Small home$5,400Listed on its own website · cost is a combination of rent and level of care. almond blossom starts at around · seen October 27, 2026
- Almond Blossom Assisted Living BH 2Chico · 37 mi · Small home$5,400Listed on its own website · cost is a combination of rent and level of care. almond blossom starts at around · seen October 27, 2026
- Almond Blossom Assisted Living-BH 1Chico · 37 mi · Small home$5,400Listed on its own website · cost is a combination of rent and level of care. almond blossom starts at around · seen October 27, 2026
- The Courtyard at Little Chico CreekChico · 38 mi · Mid-size home$5,558Listed on its own website · studio · seen October 5, 2026
- Roseleaf Senior CareChico · 38 mi · Mid-size home$3,390Listed on its own website · pricing starts as low as · seen October 27, 2026
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 15 homes with 7 to 49 beds and similar homes within 38 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
- Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
- Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
- Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
- Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
- We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
- It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
- The care level
Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.
- What is billed separately
Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.
- Move-in costs
A one-time move-in fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.
- Increases
California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.
An estimate for planning, not a quote. A home sets the price after hearing about the care needed.
Daily life
Daily life here is not on file yet, and that says nothing about the home.
The best way to see it is a visit.
Request a tourWhere it is
70 Gilmore Road, Red Bluff, CA 96080Address from the public record · October 26, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.
Opening the neighborhood map…
- St. Elizabeth Community HospitalHospital · General acute care, on the state’s list2.1 mi
Straight-line distances; check the drive or the walk. Hospital: the nearest general acute care hospital on the state’s list (CDPH, September 16, 2026).
Open directionsThe state record
California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
CDSS public record, read October 26, 2026 · License #525002806 · See the state’s own record
The last 36 months — 8 of 14 documents
Complaint outcomes in these 36 months, in the state’s words: 1 “Substantiated” and 2 “Unsubstantiated”.
20264 state visits · 5 documents
Sep 8, 2026Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not seek medical attention in a timely manner. - SUNSTANTIATED
/08/2026 10:00 AM Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rebecca Knight, made an unannounced visit to the facility and met with house manager Julia Hensel. The purpose of this visit was to deliver the results of a complaint investigation. During the course of the investigation LPA conducted interviews and reviewed documents. Continued on LIC9099-C Substantiated Staff did not seek medical attention in a timely manner. - SUNSTANTIATED It was reported that Resident 1 (R1) had a seizure lasting (30) thirty minutes and staff did not call 911 or take the resident to the hospital. LPA reviewed the following documents: MAR for R1 indicates that R1 was away from the facility with family for the dates of 07/31/2026 and 08/01/2026. R1 was not at the facility to receive their medications. The facility reports that they provided R1’s medications to the family for R1 before they left the facility. It is unknown whether R1 took their medication while they were away from the facility. Incident report details on 08/04/2026 R1 had three seizures which lasted 30 to 45 seconds each and were spaced 5 to 7 minutes apart. Reports that staff offered to call emergency services and R1 declined. No documents related to the 08/04/2026 ER visit were provided to LPA. Document related to 08/11/2026 follow-up medical appointment reports that R1 was evaluated due to seizure and chest pain. This report includes details that R1 reported to medical staff of a recent episode of multiple seizures back-to-back which included a prolonged 30-minute event. Report states that staff did not call paramedics as expected by R1, which caused R1 concern. Medication levels were checked and reported to be low. In this report the attending physician reported rapid weight gain of R1 and noted that this may affect the effectiveness of R1’s seizure medication. Seizure protocol instructions in the report include a direction to call 911 if the duration of the seizure lasts more than 5 minutes without signs of stopping or if a second seizure starts immediately after the first without full recovery. According to Healthline, full recovery typically takes anywhere from 5 to 30 minutes after an epileptic seizure. Continued on LIC9099-C LPA attempted to contact the staff who assisted R1 during the seizures. LPA did not receive a return call, and therefore no interview was conducted. Administrator stated It was reported to them that on 08/05/2026 R1 had a seizure. R1 was not transported to the hospital after the seizure. When R1 moved into the facility on 07/30/2025 R1’s physician instructed the facility that EMS should be called if R1 hit their head, had multiple seizures, or the seizure lasted 5 minutes or longer. Administrator stated on 08/05/2026 R1 did have multiple (3 or 4) seizures in the span of 30 minutes but none of them lasted longer than 45 seconds. Administrator stated they did request a seizure plan from R1’s physician when R1 moved in on 07/30/2025 but they had not received it the time of the interview with LPA on 08/12/2026. It was determined that R1 did have multiple seizures on 08/05/2026 and staff did not call EMS for R1 to be evaluated or transported. At the time of the incident the facility did not have a seizure plan from R1’s doctor with specific instructions. This allegation is substantiated. Based on interviews and evidence obtained during the investigation, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore, the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, (Title 22), is being cited on the attached LIC9099D. Appeal rights were provided. Exit interview conducted and a copy of the report was provided to administrator Julie Wilcox.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 8, 2026 · control 59-AS-20260807144304
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87465(g) · Plan of correction due date: Sep 22, 2026
87465(g) Incidental Medical and Dental Care (g) The licensee shall immediately telephone 9-1-1 if an injury or other circumstance has resulted in an imminent threat to a resident’s health including, but not limited to, an apparent life-threatening medical crisis except as specified in Sections 87469(c)(2), (c)(3), or (c)(4). This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews and document review the facility failed to ensure that EMS was called to evaluate 1 of 20 residents when the resident had multiple seizures. This poses a potential health, safety, or personal rights risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 8, 2026
Plan of correction: Licensee agrees to conduct staff training on when and how to call 911 for a resident who has had a medical emergency. Licensee shall submit training materials and staff training sign in sheet to LPA as proof of correction. POC is due 09/22/2026.
Aug 4, 2026Facility evaluation reportCase Management - OtherReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Other
08/04/2026 01:48 PM Licensing Program Analyst Rebecca Knight conducted an unannounced case management visit and met with administrator Julie Wilcox. The purpose of the visit was to check temperatures in the facility. LPA and the administrator toured the facility. LPA took random temperature readings in various common areas and resident rooms. Temperatures ranged between 79 and 84 degrees Fahrenheit. The outside temperature in Red Bluff at the date and time of the visit was 103 degrees. No deficiencies were cited as a result of today’s visit. Exit interview conducted and a copy of the report was provided to administrator Julie Wilcox.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 4, 2026
Aug 4, 2026Facility evaluation reportCase Management - IncidentReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Incident
08/04/2026 112:20 PM Licensing Program Analyst Rebecca Knight conducted an unannounced case management visit and met with administrator Julie Wilcox. Today’s visit is regarding an incident that occurred on 07/24/2026. It was reported that on 07/24/2026 at 6:30am Staff 1 (S1) was waking residents up for breakfast and found Resident 1 (R1) in bed unresponsive. S1 notified the house manager and 911 was called immediately. CPR was not performed as R1 had passed away several hours previous which was confirmed by EMS at 06:45 AM. Law enforcement deemed the death as non-suspicious. During the course of the investigation, it was learned that on April 4, 2026 R1 had been hospitalized for a gall bladder infection. R1 was initially treated at a local hospital, subsequently transported to Dignity Health Sacramento, and was then transported to Stanford Hospital for surgery and treatment. R1 was in Stanford Hospital for approximately 2 weeks. On 04/17/2026 R1 came back to the facility with orders for home health. Within 72 hours R1 complained of feeling unwell and was transported back to the local hospital and then back to Stanford Hospital for treatment On 05/01/2026 R1 was admitted to skilled nursing. R1 remained in skilled nursing for 6 weeks to receive IV antibiotic treatments and rehabilitation. R1 was discharged back to the facility from skilled nursing on 07/06/2026 with orders for home health assistance. The skilled nursing facility deemed R1 medically cleared to return to the facility. R1 had seen their primary care physician on 07/15/2026 with an order to start seeing a cardiologist on 07/28/2026 for an echocardiogram and a follow-up appointment was scheduled for 07/29/2026 for a follow-up appointment with their primary care physician. It was determined that the facility made all appropriate arrangement for R1 to seek medical treatment when they initially started feeling unwell and for all subsequent medical appointments prior to the death of R1. No deficiencies were cited as a result of today’s visit. Exit interview conducted and a copy of the report was provided to administrator Julie Wilcox.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 4, 2026
Jul 14, 2026Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
07/14/2026 09:30 AM Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rebecca Knight arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a Required-1 Year inspection. LPA met with Julia Hensel site supervisor and explained the purpose of the visit. Administrator Julie Wilcox and was unavailable for the visit and was notified that LPA would be conducting the inspection. LPA Knight and staff toured the facility together to ensure the health and safety of clients in care. Areas toured include but are not limited to twelve (12) client rooms, common areas, three and one half (3.5) bathrooms, kitchen, storage areas, backyard and office. Staff and resident files were reviewed. All employees requiring background checks are cleared. Administrator certificate is current. Medication is locked in a cabinet. Cleaning supplies are locked in a cabinet. Common area, bathrooms and kitchen were clean and in good repair. All bedrooms had required furniture, bedding, and lighting. Bedding, linens, and towels for clients were observed and found to be clean and in good repair. Food appears to be stored and prepared properly. Facility has required (7) seven-day non-perishable and (2) day perishable supply of food. Fire extinguishers fully charged and inspected. Smoke detectors are all operational, are hard wired to the local fire department and serviced by SaFirei Integrated Protection. There are no pools/bodies of water are on premises. The facility has been conducting fire drills monthly. Continued on LIC809-C The following deficiencies were observed during the inspection: LPA observed discarded swamp cooler, wood and various debris on the east side of the exterior of the facility. Licensee agrees to remove the discarded swamp cooler and debris from the East side of the building premises by 07/28/2026. Licensee agrees to send photographs of cleared area to LPA as proof of correction. LPA took temperature readings in common areas and multiple resident rooms. Temperature ranged between 82 and 85 degrees Fahrenheit at 10:00 AM. The temperature in Red Bluff is forecasted to reach 102 degrees Fahrenheit this day and for the next few days. The facility is currently using swamp coolers that are not sufficiently cooling the building. The facility has central air conditioning units but have not been using them. Licensee agrees to utilize the existing central air conditioning in the building or otherwise cool the temperature of common areas and resident rooms. This requirement is due immediately. Deficiencies are being cited under California Code of Regulations, (Title 22) as a result of today’s inspection and are documented on the attached LIC809-D. Exit interview conducted, appeal rights and a copy of report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 14, 2026
Jan 12, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff verbally intimidated resident. - UNSUBSTANTIATED Staff withheld resident’s personal belongings as punishment. - UNSUBSTANTIATED
/12/202611:45 AM Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rebecca Knight arrived at the facility unannounced to deliver the results of a complaint investigation. LPA met with administrator Julie Wilcox and explained the purpose of the visit. During the course of the investigation LPA conducted interviews and reviewed documents. Continued on LIC9099-C Unsubstantiated Page 2 Staff verbally intimidated resident. – UNSUBSTANTIATED It was reported that Staff 1 (S1) tried to force Resident 1 (R1) into taking a nebulizer treatment that R1 does not want to take. Also reports that S1 bosses R1 around and tries to “make deals” with R1 so R1 will take the treatment. R1 feels verbally “beat up.” LPA reviewed MAR for October 2025 which includes a prescription for a nebulizer treatment three times per day. The MAR has multiple documented refusal dates by R1 for this medication. R1’s Physician’s Report notes that R1 tends to forget to take their medications and requires assistance with providing medication at the appropriate times. R1 stated they do oxygen at night and don’t need a nebulizer. If R1 refused the treatment some staff would get mad at R1 and some would just say that was not ok. R1 stated staff treat them good at the facility. Staff stated they told R1 that it’s important to take the medication that their doctor prescribed to them, and staff are concerned If R1 won’t take the treatment. Administrator stated that R1 likes to refuse their nebulizer treatment often. Facility staff try to time the treatments and explain to R1 that they really need it and try to re-direct. This allegation is unsubstantiated. Page 3 Staff withheld resident’s personal belongings as punishment. – UNSUBSTANTIATED It was reported S1 withheld cigarettes from R1 because they would not take their nebulizer treatment. R1 stated their doctor wants them to quit smoking. The facility cut R1’s cigarettes back to one per hour when R1 went on oxygen. R1 states they were getting as many as they needed but they tapered them off to one an hour. Staff stated R1 gets one cigarette per hour and R1 forgets that they receive their hourly cigarette. Staff denies withholding cigarettes from R1. Administrator stated staff have not been withholding cigarettes from R1 and the facility has started asking residents to initial every time staff give them a cigarette. This allegation is unsubstantiated. This agency has investigated the above allegations. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violations occurred, and the findings are UNSUBSTANTIATED. No deficiencies cited. Exit interview conducted and a copy of the report was provided to administrator Julie Wilcox.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 12, 2026 · control 59-AS-20251106090007
20251 state visit · 1 document
Jul 17, 2025Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
07/17/2025 11:45 AM Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rebecca Knight arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a Required-1 Year inspection. LPA met with administrator Julie Wilcox and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA Knight and the administrator toured the facility together to ensure the health and safety of clients in care. Areas toured include but are not limited to twelve (12) client rooms, common areas, three and one half (3.5) bathrooms, kitchen, storage areas, backyard and office. Staff and resident files were reviewed. All employees requiring background checks are cleared. Administrator certificate is current. Medication was reviewed. Medication is locked in a cabinet. Cleaning supplies are locked in a cabinet. The facility was observed to be at a comfortable temperature. Common area, bathrooms and kitchen were clean and in good repair. All bedrooms had required furniture, bedding, and lighting. Bedding, linens, and towels for clients were observed and found to be clean and in good repair. Food appears to be stored and prepared properly. Facility has required (7) seven-day non-perishable and (2) day perishable supply of food. Fire extinguishers fully charged and inspected. Smoke detectors are all operational, are hard wired to the local fire department and serviced by Safe Fire Integrated Protection. There are no pools/bodies of water are on premises. The facility conducted an emergency evacuation drill in June 2025 has been conducting fire drills monthly. LPA requested copies of the following documents: LIC500 Personnel Report. In the areas toured no immediate health, safety, or personal rights violations were observed. No deficiencies are being cited as a result of today’s inspection. Exit interview conducted and copy of report was provided to administrator Julie Wilcox.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 17, 2025
20242 state visits · 2 documents
Nov 12, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff do not ensure medications are dispensed as prescribed - UNSUBSTANTIATED Facility is not meeting the incontinence needs of the resident - UNSUBSTANTIATED
/12/2024 10:00 AM Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rebecca Knight, made an unannounced visit to the facility and met with assistant administrator Julie Wilcox. The purpose of this visit was to deliver the results of a complaint investigation. During the course of the investigation LPA conducted interviews and reviewed the following documents: Admission agreement, Medication Administration Record (MAR) for the months August and September 2024, Physicians Report, Care Plan, Emergency Room and Wound Care clinic documents for 1 resident. Continued on LIC9099-C Unsubstantiated Staff do not ensure medications are dispensed as prescribed - UNSUBSTANTIATED It was reported that Resident 1 (R1) went to the ER and was prescribed an antifungal cream and antibiotics but R1 did not receive their antibiotics until 9/17/24. LPA reviewed documentation of R1 being seen in the ER on 08/26/2024 to be treated for an abscess. During this visit R1 was prescribed an oral antibiotic to take twice a day for ten days, no antifungal cream was prescribed. Discharge instructions also included a recommendation for follow up appointments for wound care. LPA reviewed documents that show R1 attended wound care appointments on 09/09/2024,09/16/2024, and 09/23/2024. LPA reviewed R1’s Medication Administration Record (MAR) for the months of August and September 2024 which shows that R1 was dispensed their first dose of the oral antibiotic on 08/27/2024 and twice per day for ten days. R1’s MAR does not include an antifungal cream and there is no record of R1 ever being prescribed an antifungal cream. Administrator stated on 08/26/2024 in the ER they did not prescribe an antifungal cream for R1. They gave R1 an IV antibiotic in the ER, prescribed R1 an oral antibiotic and sent an oral antibiotic home with R1 for the next day. Stated R1 does not use an anti-fungal cream. Stated staff picked up the oral antibiotic on 08/27/2024 and it was dispensed to R1 the same day. It was determined that R1 was prescribed an oral antibiotic on 08/26/2024, the facility picked up the medication from the pharmacy on 08/27/2024 and dispensed to R1 the same day. R1 has never been prescribed or dispensed an antifungal cream. This allegation is unsubstantiated. Continued on LIC9099-C Facility is not meeting the incontinence needs of the resident - UNSUBSTANTIATED It was reported that the ER also requested that R1 wear bigger Depends because the small ones were irritating a fungal infection on their bottom. The RP states it took a week for the facility to receive the order of larger depends. LPA reviewed R1’s Physicians Report which states that R1 has a diagnosis of urinary incontinence but is able to care for their own toileting needs. Administrator stated that R1 gets their Depends through their insurance through their doctor and they are delivered once per month. R1 gets 6 packages of 20 each which are placed in R1’s room. R1 is independent and staff don’t have to help R1 with their Depends. R1 wears a size medium. The facility had some size large on hand for R1 to try but R1 complained that they were too large. R1 runs out of Depends every month and the facility purchases extras for the facility and R1 also uses those. It was determined that R1 is prescribed 6 packages of 20 Depends each month and if R1 runs out the facility provides Depends for R1. There is no mention in the ER discharge documents that R1 has a fungal infection or needs a larger size Depends. This allegation is unsubstantiated. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violations occurred, and the findings are UNSUBSTANTIATED. An exit interview was conducted. A copy of the report was provided to assistant administrator Julie Wilcox.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 12, 2024 · control 59-AS-20240917164916
Jul 29, 2024Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
07/29/2024 12:30 PM Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rebecca Knight arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a Required-1 Year inspection. LPA met with administrator Julie Wilcox and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA Knight and the administrator toured the facility together to ensure the health and safety of clients in care. Areas toured include but are not limited to twelve (12) client rooms, common areas, three and one half (3.5) bathrooms, kitchen, storage areas and office. Staff and resident files were reviewed. All employees requiring background checks are cleared. Bedding, linens, and towels for clients were observed and found to be clean and in good repair. Medication is locked in a cabinet. Administrator applied for renewal of administrator certificate in April 2024 and will send LPA a copy of their new certificate once received. The facility was observed to be at a comfortable temperature. Common area was clean and in good repair. All bedrooms had required furniture, bedding, and lighting. Bathrooms were clean and in good repair. Kitchen was clean and in good repair. Food appears to be stored and prepared properly. Facility has required (7) seven-day non-perishable and (2) day perishable supply of food. Fire extinguishers fully charged and were inspected in February 2024. Smoke detectors are all operational, are hard wired to the local fire department and serviced by Beacon Fire Alarms & Security Corporation. There are no pools/bodies of water are on premises. The facility has been conducting fire drills monthly. LPA requested copies of the following documents: LIC308 Designation of Facility Responsibility LIC500 Personnel Report In the areas toured no immediate health, safety, or personal rights violations were observed. No deficiencies are being cited as a result of today’s inspection. Exit interview conducted and copy of report was provided to administrator Julie Wilcox.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 29, 2024
Earlier years2021 to 2023 · 6 documents
20231 state visit · 1 document
Jun 15, 2023Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
06/15/2023 12:45 PM Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rebecca Knight arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a Required-1 Year inspection. LPA met with administrator Julie Wilcox nd explained the purpose of the visit. LPA Knight and the administrator toured the facility together to ensure the health and safety of clients in care. Areas toured include but are not limited to twelve (12) client rooms, common areas, three (3) bathrooms, kitchen, storage areas and office. Staff and resident files were reviewed. All employees requiring background checks are cleared. Bedding, linens, and towels for clients were observed and found to be clean and in good repair. There is an adequate supply of toiletries for the clients. Medication is locked in a cabinet. The facility was observed to be at a comfortable temperature. Common area was clean and in good repair. All bedrooms had required furniture, bedding, and lighting. Bathrooms were clean and in good repair. Kitchen was clean and in good repair. Food appears to be stored and prepared properly. Facility has required (7) seven-day non-perishable and (2) day perishable supply of food. Fire extinguishers fully charged and were inspected in November 2022. Smoke detectors are all operational. No pools/bodies of water are on premises. No firearms are on premises. Last disaster drill was conducted in June 2023 which was a fire drill, the facility has been conducting fire drills every 3 months. In the areas toured no immediate health, safety, or personal rights violations were observed. No deficiencies are being cited as a result of today’s inspection. Technical assistance was provided. Exit interview conducted and copy of report was provided to administrator Julie Wilcox.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 15, 2023
20223 state visits · 3 documents
Jun 7, 2022Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
06/07/2022 1:45 PM Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rebecca Knight arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a Required-1 Year Inspection utilizing the infection control domain. LPA met with supervisor Julia Hensel and explained the purpose of the visit. Administrator Julie Wilcox arrived a short time later and completed the inspection. Prior to initiating the annual inspection, LPA completed required COVID-19 testing protocols, and a daily self-screening questionnaire for symptoms of COVID-19 infection to affirm no COVID-19 related symptoms. LPA ensured they applied hand sanitizer before entering the facility and the following Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was worn: N95 mask, gloves. Additionally, LPA Knight was screened by facility staff. LPA Knight and Ms.Wilcox toured facility together to ensure health and safety of residents in care. Areas toured include but are not limited to: resident bedrooms, common areas, bathrooms, kitchen and storage rooms. In the areas toured no immediate health, safety, or personal rights violations were observed. LPA Knight and the administrator completed the infection control domain and facility was found to be in substantial compliance at this time. No deficiencies are being cited as a result of todays inspection. Exit interview conducted and copy of report was emailed to Administrator Julie Wilcox.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 7, 2022
Mar 14, 2022Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Resident is left on couch for extended period, not given meals, not having their adult diaper changed. Staff person locks themselves in the office and tells residents to go away when they ask for assistance.
/14/2022 12:00 PM Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rebecca Knight, made an unannounced visit to the facility and met with Julie Wilcox administrator for the facility. The purpose of this visit was to deliver the results of the complaint investigation of the above allegations. Prior to initiating the visit, LPA completed required COVID-19 testing protocols, and a daily self-screening questionnaire for symptoms of COVID-19 infection to affirm no COVID-19 related symptoms; contacted administrator and completed a facility risk assessment. LPA ensured they applied hand sanitizer before entering the facility and the following Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was worn: N95 Mask, gloves. It was reported that a resident was left on the couch for an extended period, not given meals, and did not have their adult diaper changed, and a staff person locked themselves in the office and told residents to go away when they asked for assistance. During the course of the investigation LPA interviewed 1 administrator, 4 staff, and 2 residents. LPA obtained the following documents to investigate the above allegations: Physicians Report for 1 resident, staffing schedules, resident list, staff list with phone numbers, text messages from staff to administrator, written warning from administrator to staff. Continued on LIC9099-C Substantiated Allegation: Resident is left on couch for extended period, not given meals, not having their adult diaper changed. - SUBSTANTIATED. Review of documents revealed that the administrator issued a written warning to S1 that stated S1 was locked in the office and R1 was left on the couch, had not been fed or changed since S1 arrived on shift. This written warning was signed and acknowledged by S1. A text message that was sent to the administrator on February 5 at 6:25 PM states “S1 is hiding in the office… R1 hasn’t had dinner and has been sitting on the couch the entire day!” A subsequent text message sent from the administrator to S1 on February 5 at 6:32 PM states “It’s time you came out of the office… I don’t think R1 has had dinner or been changed since you got there.” A text message on February 5 at 7:31 PM from the administrator states “Did S1 come out?” to which the reply was “Yeah finally fed her.” During document review it was learned that R1 has a diagnosis of dementia and requires assistance with personal activities of daily living. During interview of administrator it was learned that on 2/05/2022 S1 filled in for staff who had called off and worked the evening shift from 4:45 PM - 11:45 PM. The administrator was notified that S1 was hiding in the office and R1 had not been fed. The administrator called S2 and they went to the facility and told S1 that they needed to work. The administrator texted S1 at 6:30 PM and told S1 they better come out of the office, feed R1 and change R1. S1 got R1 up at 6:30 PM and gave R1 dinner. At 7:30 PM administrator received confirmation that, S1 had come out of the office and fed R1. S2 had placed R1 on the couch at about 2:30 PM that day. R1 had lunch and then snack at 2:30 PM. S2 had changed R1's adult diaper at 4:15 PM before they went home and then put R1 back on the couch. S1 changed R1's adult diaper after R1 had dinner at 6:30 PM. During resident interviews it was learned that on more than one occasion S1 has locked themselves in the office. Staff interviews confirmed that S1 had left R1 on the couch unattended, did not change R1’s adult diaper and did not feed R1 any meals or snacks during the time period that S1 was locked in the office. Continued on LIC9099-C Allegation: Staff person locks themselves in the office and tells residents to go away when they ask for assistance. - SUBSTANTIATED. Review of documents revealed that the administrator issued a written warning to S1 that stated S1 was locked in the office and R1 was left on the couch, had not been fed or changed since S1 arrived on shift. This written warning was signed and acknowledged by S1. A subsequent text message sent from the administrator to S1 on February 5 at 6:32 PM states “It’s time you came out of the office… I don’t think R1 has had dinner or been changed since you got there.” During interview of administrator it was learned that on 2/05/2022 S1 filled in for staff who had called off and worked the evening shift from 4:45 PM - 11:45 PM, The administrator was notified that S1 was hiding in the office and R1 had not been fed. The administrator texted S1 at 6:30 PM and told S1 they better come out of the office, feed R1 and change R1. During resident interviews it was learned that on more than one occasion S1 has locked themselves in the office. Staff interviews confirmed that S1 had locked themselves in the office. Based on interviews and evidence obtained during the investigation, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore, the above allegations are found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, (Title 22), is being cited on the attached LIC9099D. Appeal rights were provided. Exit interview was conducted and the report was emailed to the administrator Julie Wilcox. Continued on LIC9099Dthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 14, 2022 · control 25-AS-20220209165503
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87625(b)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Mar 14, 2022
87625(b)(2) Managed incontinence – (b) In addition to Section 87611, General Requirements for Allowable Health Conditions, the licensee shall be responsible for the following: (2) Ensuring that incontinent residents are checked during those periods of time when they are known to be incontinent, including during the night. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews and records review, it was determined that S1 left R1 on the couch without checking if their adult diaper needed to be changed for a significant period of time, which poses a potential health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 14, 2022
Plan of correction: Administrator agrees to conduct an in-service training to all staff on the importance checking on and providing care to residents who require assistance with activities of daily living, in particular incontinence. The proof of correction is to be received by LPA Knight by 3/22/2022.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87468.1(a) · Plan of correction due date: Mar 14, 2022
87468.1(a) Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities – (a) Residents in all residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following personal rights: (1) To be accorded dignity in their personal relationships with staff, residents, and other persons. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews and records review, it was determined that on 2/05/2022 S1 locked themselves in the facility office and left residents unattended, which poses a potential health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 14, 2022
Plan of correction: Administrator agrees to conduct an in-service training to all staff on the importance of being focused on providing care and supervision to residents without distractions. The proof of correction is to be received by LPA Knight by 3/22/2022.
Mar 2, 2022Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Resident does not wear adult underwear and urinates on the floor
/02/2022 09:30 AM Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rebecca Knight, made an unannounced visit to the facility and met with Julie Wilcox administrator for the facility. The purpose of this visit was to deliver the results of the complaint investigation of the above allegations. Prior to initiating the visit, LPA completed required COVID-19 testing protocols, and a daily self-screening questionnaire for symptoms of COVID-19 infection to affirm no COVID-19 related symptoms; contacted administrator and completed a facility risk assessment. LPA ensured they applied hand sanitizer before entering the facility and the following Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was worn: N95 Mask, gloves. It was reported that a resident does not wear adult underwear and urinates on the floor. Continued on LIC9099-C Unsubstantiated During the course of the investigation LPA interviewed 1 administrator, 2 staff, and 2 residents. LPA obtained the following documents to investigate the above allegation: Admissions agreements for 2 residents, physician’s reports for 2 residents, staff list with phone numbers. Allegation: Resident does not wear adult underwear and urinates on the floor - UNSUBSTANTIATED. Review of documents revealed that R1 does not suffer from bladder impairment and is able to care for their own toileting needs. During interview of administrator it was learned that R1 underwent a full hysterectomy in October 2021. Two weeks after surgery R1 developed an infection and suddenly became incontinent. R1 was taken to their physician and treated for the infection. R1 started to wear adult underwear but there were times R1 would take off their adult underwear, would not tell staff that they needed help, and would urinate on the floor of R1’s shared room when R1 stood up. Once the administrator was made aware of this, staff were instructed to ask R1 every hour if R1 needed to change their adult diaper and would provide R1 with assistance when required. R1 experienced the incontinence issues for a total of 2 weeks. After the infection cleared up the incontinence stopped and R1 resumed using the bathroom on their own. During resident interviews R1 stated that they do wear adult underwear. R2 stated that sometimes R1 does not want to wear adult underwear and has accidents in their room. During staff interviews two staff stated that R1 had an issue with incontinence for a short time after R1 had emergency surgery but R1 has not had incontinence issues for at least two months. During LPAs tour of the facility on today’s date, LPA found that the room in question had no urine odor, there is significant staining on the carpet and the licensee has contracted replacement of carpeting in the room with vinyl or laminate flooring. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred, and the findings are unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted. A copy of the report was emailed to facility administrator Julie Wilcox. No deficiencies were cited on today’s date.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 2, 2022 · control 25-AS-20211213090224
20212 state visits · 2 documents
Oct 28, 2021Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff do not wear masks or gloves. Facility has pests. Facility staff does not handle residents' medications and food in a sanitary manner. Facility is in disrepair/leak in kitchen.
/28/2021 1:30 PM Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rebecca Knight, made an unannounced visit to the facility and met with Julie Wilcox administrator for the facility. The purpose of this visit was to deliver the results of the complaint investigation of the above allegations. Prior to initiating the visit, LPA completed required COVID-19 testing protocols, and a daily self-screening questionnaire for symptoms of COVID-19 infection to affirm no COVID-19 related symptoms; contacted administrator and completed a facility risk assessment. LPA ensured they applied hand sanitizer before entering the facility and the following Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was worn: Surgical Mask, gloves. Continued on LIC9099C Unsubstantiated During the course of the investigation LPA interviewed 1 administrator, 1 maintenance staff, and 4 care staff. LPA obtained the following documents to investigate the above allegations: Facility Food Handling & Safety policy, Medication Handling Policy, Visitor policy, pest control invoices, receipt for repair supplies, staff list with contact information. Allegation: Staff do not wear masks or gloves. - UNSUBSTANTIATED. During LPA Knight’s visit to the facility on 7/12/2021 to conduct an Infection Control Annual Inspection LPA observed all staff who were in the facility wearing face masks. Staff are not required to wear gloves at all times in the facility. Staff interviews revealed that all staff are aware that they are required to wear masks at all times while they are in the facility. Staff confirmed that they are all wearing masks while they are inside of the facility at all times. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred, and the findings are unsubstantiated Allegation: Facility has pests. - UNSUBSTANTIATED. Review of invoices from T. Brooks Pest Control revealed that the facility has regular pest control service and additional bed bug service treatments. Administrator stated the facility covered all of the mattresses with bed bug protectors. The pest control company comes in twice a month and treats the affected rooms, and staff goes through the facility every week with housekeeping to inspect for bedbugs. Staff interviews confirmed that the facility does have an issue with bed bugs, and that the facility has regular pest control services. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred, and the findings are unsubstantiated Continued on LIC9099C Allegation: Facility staff does not handle residents' medications and food in a sanitary manner. - UNSUBSTANTIATED. Review of the facility’s Food Handling & Safety policy revealed that the facility trains staff to wash their hands with warm soap and water for 20 seconds and to follow the “no bare hands” rule which teaches that an individual’s bare skin should not come into contact with ready-to-eat foods. Instead, alternative procedures should be practiced, such as using tongs, spatulas, deli tissue, or wearing clean, single-use gloves. It was learned during staff interviews that all staff sanitize their hands and wear gloves before preparing or serving food. Review of the facility’s Medication Handling Instructions revealed that staff are trained to first wash their hands for at least 20 seconds at the start of a medication pass and wear sanitary gloves although wearing gloves is not required by CCLD regulations. CCLD requirements do not include the use of gloves when handling medications, the requirement is to ensure the area where staff handle medications is clean and sanitary. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred, and the findings are unsubstantiated An exit interview was conducted. A copy of the report was emailed to facility administrator Micah Carey. No deficiencies were cited on today’s date.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 28, 2021 · control 25-AS-20210618110753
Jul 12, 2021Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
7/12/2021 1:00 PM Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rebecca Knight arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a Required-1 Year Inspection utilizing the infection control domain. LPA met with Administrator Julie Wilcox and explained the purpose of the visit. Prior to initiating the annual inspection, LPA completed required COVID-19 testing protocols, and a daily self-screening questionnaire for symptoms of COVID-19 infection to affirm no COVID-19 related symptoms; contacted administrator and completed a facility risk assessment. LPA ensured they applied hand sanitizer before entering the facility and the following Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was worn: Surgical mask, gloves. Additionally, LPA Knight was screened by facility staff. LPA Knight and Ms.Wilcox toured facility together to ensure health and safety of residents in care. Areas toured include but are not limited to: resident bedrooms, common areas, bathrooms, kitchen and storage rooms. In the areas toured no immediate health, safety, or personal rights violations were observed. LPA Knight and the administrator completed the infection control domain and facility was found to be in substantial compliance at this time. No deficiencies are being cited as a result of todays inspection. Technical assistance was provided. Exit interview conducted and copy of report was given to Administrator Julie Wilcox.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 12, 2021
The state marks this report as 3 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 1. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
22 of 22 beds were occupied at the March 14, 2022 state visit — a count on that day, not an opening.
License holder
The Sail House Inc., licensed since 2016.
The state’s totals for this licenseSince 2016, as the state’s facility page counts them
- State visits on file
- 13
- Total complaints
- 6
- Substantiated allegations
- 3
- Type A citations
- 0
- Type B citations
- 3
These are the state’s own totals for this license since 2016, per CDSS records. The state counts them apart from the documents above, and they can differ from what those documents show; the documents say what each visit found. One complaint can contain several allegations.
Compare with homes the same size
| This home | Typical | |
|---|---|---|
| Type A citations | 0 | 0 |
| Type B citations | 3 | 1 |
| Substantiated allegations | 3 | 2 |
| Total complaints | 6 | 6 |
“Typical” is the statewide median for licensed homes this size. It does not adjust for years licensed, and older licenses have had more visits and reports. The median is across the 1,354 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record. The figures compared are the state’s totals, not the documents.
What the state’s words mean
CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents stand in their place.
Frequently asked questions
A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
Quick answers about Gilmore Place
Is Gilmore Place licensed?
The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
How many residents is Gilmore Place licensed for?
22 residents — a mid-size home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Has Gilmore Place been cited?
0 Type A and 3 Type B citations since 2016, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. Those records count 13 state visits over the same years.
Is Gilmore Place still open?
This license was on the CDSS roster as of November 11, 2026.
What does Gilmore Place cost?
$4,350 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,450–$5,750. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 15 homes with 7 to 49 beds and similar homes within 38 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.
A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.
Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
Does Gilmore Place take Medi-Cal?
On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Who holds the license?
The license is held by The Sail House Inc., per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Is there a hospital nearby?
St. Elizabeth Community Hospital is 2.1 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.
Can Gilmore Place keep a resident on hospice?
Not on file — the state’s record does not list hospice care on this license. Ask: “Can a resident stay here on hospice, and under what conditions?”
Gilmore Place license and inspection record
- Name on the license: “GILMORE PLACE”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
- License #525002806. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed for 22 residents — a mid-size home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed to The Sail House Inc., per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- First licensed in 2016, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 13 state inspection visits since 2016, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 0 Type A and 3 Type B citations on file since 2016, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. The same records count 13 state visits in that period.
- 6 complaints and 3 substantiated allegations on file since 2016, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
- The most recent state visit on file is September 8, 2026, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗
Nearby
Other homes nearby
Licensed homes near this one in Tehama County, most information on file first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.
- Map
Starting rate
$5,295 a month to start
Listed by the home on its own website · October 27, 2026On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$5,050 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,150–$6,250On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$5,300 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,350–$6,500On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,700 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,700–$6,200On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$5,250 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,300–$6,500On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,650 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,800–$5,750On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
Street maps © Protomaps · © OpenStreetMap
Explore Tehama County