Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Gilmore Place

Mid-size home·Licensed for 22·Red Bluff, California

Licensed since 2016Licence #525002806
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchairState licensing record · September 27, 2026
  • Estimated starting rate$4,300 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $3,400–$5,700
  • Home sizeLicensed for 22Mid-size care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit22 of 22 beds occupiedMarch 14, 2022 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitSeptember 8, 2026CDSS inspection record

Gilmore Place is a mid-size care home in Red Bluff — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 22 residents since 2016. Dementia care, hospice care and bedridden care are not on file.

Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Gilmore Place

Is Gilmore Place licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

How many residents is Gilmore Place licensed for?

22 residents — a mid-size home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Has Gilmore Place been cited?

0 Type A and 2 Type B citations since 2016, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 12 state visits over the same years.

Is Gilmore Place still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Gilmore Place cost?

$4,300 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,400–$5,700. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 9 homes with 7 to 49 beds and similar homes within 35 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Gilmore Place take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by The Sail House Inc., per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Is there a hospital nearby?

St. Elizabeth Community Hospital is 2.1 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Gilmore Place keep a resident on hospice?

Not on file — the state’s record does not list hospice care on this license. Ask: “Can a resident stay here on hospice, and under what conditions?”

Gilmore Place license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “GILMORE PLACE”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #525002806. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed for 22 residents — a mid-size home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed to The Sail House Inc., per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2016, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 12 state inspection visits since 2016, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 2 Type B citations on file since 2016, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 12 state visits in that period.
  • 5 complaints and 2 substantiated allegations on file since 2016, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is September 8, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 6 residents
  • Dementia / memory careNot on file · ask the home
  • Hospice careNot on file · ask the home
  • BedriddenNot on file · ask the home

State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER.22 AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 6 MAY BE NON-AMBULATORY.

935 - ELDERLY

CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026

As needs change

5 questions to ask the home — nothing on file yet
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver not on file

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation not on file

    Ask: “If memory loss develops, what would change — and when would a move be needed?”

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$4,300a month to start

Likely $3,400–$5,700

From 9 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$4,300a month

Likely $3,400–$5,850

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room

Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.

  • Starting monthly rate$4,300likely $3,400–$5,700

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 9 homes with 7 to 49 beds and similar homes within 35 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $3,400–$5,850
$4,300
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,100–$8,850
$6,300
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 9 homes with 7 to 49 beds and similar homes within 35 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

9 homes like this within 35 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,600–$5,000.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 9 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 70 Gilmore Road, Red Bluff, CA 96080Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2021, the state has filed 13 documents for this home, and its records count 12 visits since 2016. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated August 4, 2026.

On file since
2021
State visits
12
Most recent visit
September 8, 2026
Occupied · March 14, 2022 visit
22 of 22 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 5 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated October 28, 2021 to January 12, 2026. 5 of the 5 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (4). 5 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 5 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations0typical 0
  • Type B citations2typical 1
  • Substantiated allegations2typical 2
  • Total complaints5typical 6

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,354 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2016.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202634020251102024220202311020223312021220

The last 36 months — 7 of 13 documents

20263 state visits · 4 documents
Aug 4, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

08/04/2026 01:48 PM Licensing Program Analyst Rebecca Knight conducted an unannounced case management visit and met with administrator Julie Wilcox. The purpose of the visit was to check temperatures in the facility. LPA and the administrator toured the facility. LPA took random temperature readings in various common areas and resident rooms. Temperatures ranged between 79 and 84 degrees Fahrenheit. The outside temperature in Red Bluff at the date and time of the visit was 103 degrees. No deficiencies were cited as a result of today’s visit. Exit interview conducted and a copy of the report was provided to administrator Julie Wilcox.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 4, 2026
Aug 4, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Incident

08/04/2026 112:20 PM Licensing Program Analyst Rebecca Knight conducted an unannounced case management visit and met with administrator Julie Wilcox. Today’s visit is regarding an incident that occurred on 07/24/2026. It was reported that on 07/24/2026 at 6:30am Staff 1 (S1) was waking residents up for breakfast and found Resident 1 (R1) in bed unresponsive. S1 notified the house manager and 911 was called immediately. CPR was not performed as R1 had passed away several hours previous which was confirmed by EMS at 06:45 AM. Law enforcement deemed the death as non-suspicious. During the course of the investigation, it was learned that on April 4, 2026 R1 had been hospitalized for a gall bladder infection. R1 was initially treated at a local hospital, subsequently transported to Dignity Health Sacramento, and was then transported to Stanford Hospital for surgery and treatment. R1 was in Stanford Hospital for approximately 2 weeks. On 04/17/2026 R1 came back to the facility with orders for home health. Within 72 hours R1 complained of feeling unwell and was transported back to the local hospital and then back to Stanford Hospital for treatment On 05/01/2026 R1 was admitted to skilled nursing. R1 remained in skilled nursing for 6 weeks to receive IV antibiotic treatments and rehabilitation. R1 was discharged back to the facility from skilled nursing on 07/06/2026 with orders for home health assistance. The skilled nursing facility deemed R1 medically cleared to return to the facility. R1 had seen their primary care physician on 07/15/2026 with an order to start seeing a cardiologist on 07/28/2026 for an echocardiogram and a follow-up appointment was scheduled for 07/29/2026 for a follow-up appointment with their primary care physician. It was determined that the facility made all appropriate arrangement for R1 to seek medical treatment when they initially started feeling unwell and for all subsequent medical appointments prior to the death of R1. No deficiencies were cited as a result of today’s visit. Exit interview conducted and a copy of the report was provided to administrator Julie Wilcox.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 4, 2026
Jul 14, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

07/14/2026 09:30 AM Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rebecca Knight arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a Required-1 Year inspection. LPA met with Julia Hensel site supervisor and explained the purpose of the visit. Administrator Julie Wilcox and was unavailable for the visit and was notified that LPA would be conducting the inspection. LPA Knight and staff toured the facility together to ensure the health and safety of clients in care. Areas toured include but are not limited to twelve (12) client rooms, common areas, three and one half (3.5) bathrooms, kitchen, storage areas, backyard and office. Staff and resident files were reviewed. All employees requiring background checks are cleared. Administrator certificate is current. Medication is locked in a cabinet. Cleaning supplies are locked in a cabinet. Common area, bathrooms and kitchen were clean and in good repair. All bedrooms had required furniture, bedding, and lighting. Bedding, linens, and towels for clients were observed and found to be clean and in good repair. Food appears to be stored and prepared properly. Facility has required (7) seven-day non-perishable and (2) day perishable supply of food. Fire extinguishers fully charged and inspected. Smoke detectors are all operational, are hard wired to the local fire department and serviced by SaFirei Integrated Protection. There are no pools/bodies of water are on premises. The facility has been conducting fire drills monthly. Continued on LIC809-C The following deficiencies were observed during the inspection: LPA observed discarded swamp cooler, wood and various debris on the east side of the exterior of the facility. Licensee agrees to remove the discarded swamp cooler and debris from the East side of the building premises by 07/28/2026. Licensee agrees to send photographs of cleared area to LPA as proof of correction. LPA took temperature readings in common areas and multiple resident rooms. Temperature ranged between 82 and 85 degrees Fahrenheit at 10:00 AM. The temperature in Red Bluff is forecasted to reach 102 degrees Fahrenheit this day and for the next few days. The facility is currently using swamp coolers that are not sufficiently cooling the building. The facility has central air conditioning units but have not been using them. Licensee agrees to utilize the existing central air conditioning in the building or otherwise cool the temperature of common areas and resident rooms. This requirement is due immediately. Deficiencies are being cited under California Code of Regulations, (Title 22) as a result of today’s inspection and are documented on the attached LIC809-D. Exit interview conducted, appeal rights and a copy of report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 14, 2026
Jan 12, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff verbally intimidated resident. - UNSUBSTANTIATED Staff withheld resident’s personal belongings as punishment. - UNSUBSTANTIATED

/12/202611:45 AM Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rebecca Knight arrived at the facility unannounced to deliver the results of a complaint investigation. LPA met with administrator Julie Wilcox and explained the purpose of the visit. During the course of the investigation LPA conducted interviews and reviewed documents. Continued on LIC9099-C Unsubstantiated Page 2 Staff verbally intimidated resident. – UNSUBSTANTIATED It was reported that Staff 1 (S1) tried to force Resident 1 (R1) into taking a nebulizer treatment that R1 does not want to take. Also reports that S1 bosses R1 around and tries to “make deals” with R1 so R1 will take the treatment. R1 feels verbally “beat up.” LPA reviewed MAR for October 2025 which includes a prescription for a nebulizer treatment three times per day. The MAR has multiple documented refusal dates by R1 for this medication. R1’s Physician’s Report notes that R1 tends to forget to take their medications and requires assistance with providing medication at the appropriate times. R1 stated they do oxygen at night and don’t need a nebulizer. If R1 refused the treatment some staff would get mad at R1 and some would just say that was not ok. R1 stated staff treat them good at the facility. Staff stated they told R1 that it’s important to take the medication that their doctor prescribed to them, and staff are concerned If R1 won’t take the treatment. Administrator stated that R1 likes to refuse their nebulizer treatment often. Facility staff try to time the treatments and explain to R1 that they really need it and try to re-direct. This allegation is unsubstantiated. Page 3 Staff withheld resident’s personal belongings as punishment. – UNSUBSTANTIATED It was reported S1 withheld cigarettes from R1 because they would not take their nebulizer treatment. R1 stated their doctor wants them to quit smoking. The facility cut R1’s cigarettes back to one per hour when R1 went on oxygen. R1 states they were getting as many as they needed but they tapered them off to one an hour. Staff stated R1 gets one cigarette per hour and R1 forgets that they receive their hourly cigarette. Staff denies withholding cigarettes from R1. Administrator stated staff have not been withholding cigarettes from R1 and the facility has started asking residents to initial every time staff give them a cigarette. This allegation is unsubstantiated. This agency has investigated the above allegations. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violations occurred, and the findings are UNSUBSTANTIATED. No deficiencies cited. Exit interview conducted and a copy of the report was provided to administrator Julie Wilcox.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 12, 2026 · control 59-AS-20251106090007
20251 state visit · 1 document
Jul 17, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

07/17/2025 11:45 AM Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rebecca Knight arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a Required-1 Year inspection. LPA met with administrator Julie Wilcox and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA Knight and the administrator toured the facility together to ensure the health and safety of clients in care. Areas toured include but are not limited to twelve (12) client rooms, common areas, three and one half (3.5) bathrooms, kitchen, storage areas, backyard and office. Staff and resident files were reviewed. All employees requiring background checks are cleared. Administrator certificate is current. Medication was reviewed. Medication is locked in a cabinet. Cleaning supplies are locked in a cabinet. The facility was observed to be at a comfortable temperature. Common area, bathrooms and kitchen were clean and in good repair. All bedrooms had required furniture, bedding, and lighting. Bedding, linens, and towels for clients were observed and found to be clean and in good repair. Food appears to be stored and prepared properly. Facility has required (7) seven-day non-perishable and (2) day perishable supply of food. Fire extinguishers fully charged and inspected. Smoke detectors are all operational, are hard wired to the local fire department and serviced by Safe Fire Integrated Protection. There are no pools/bodies of water are on premises. The facility conducted an emergency evacuation drill in June 2025 has been conducting fire drills monthly. LPA requested copies of the following documents: LIC500 Personnel Report. In the areas toured no immediate health, safety, or personal rights violations were observed. No deficiencies are being cited as a result of today’s inspection. Exit interview conducted and copy of report was provided to administrator Julie Wilcox.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 17, 2025
20242 state visits · 2 documents
Nov 12, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not ensure medications are dispensed as prescribed - UNSUBSTANTIATED Facility is not meeting the incontinence needs of the resident - UNSUBSTANTIATED

/12/2024 10:00 AM Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rebecca Knight, made an unannounced visit to the facility and met with assistant administrator Julie Wilcox. The purpose of this visit was to deliver the results of a complaint investigation. During the course of the investigation LPA conducted interviews and reviewed the following documents: Admission agreement, Medication Administration Record (MAR) for the months August and September 2024, Physicians Report, Care Plan, Emergency Room and Wound Care clinic documents for 1 resident. Continued on LIC9099-C Unsubstantiated Staff do not ensure medications are dispensed as prescribed - UNSUBSTANTIATED It was reported that Resident 1 (R1) went to the ER and was prescribed an antifungal cream and antibiotics but R1 did not receive their antibiotics until 9/17/24. LPA reviewed documentation of R1 being seen in the ER on 08/26/2024 to be treated for an abscess. During this visit R1 was prescribed an oral antibiotic to take twice a day for ten days, no antifungal cream was prescribed. Discharge instructions also included a recommendation for follow up appointments for wound care. LPA reviewed documents that show R1 attended wound care appointments on 09/09/2024,09/16/2024, and 09/23/2024. LPA reviewed R1’s Medication Administration Record (MAR) for the months of August and September 2024 which shows that R1 was dispensed their first dose of the oral antibiotic on 08/27/2024 and twice per day for ten days. R1’s MAR does not include an antifungal cream and there is no record of R1 ever being prescribed an antifungal cream. Administrator stated on 08/26/2024 in the ER they did not prescribe an antifungal cream for R1. They gave R1 an IV antibiotic in the ER, prescribed R1 an oral antibiotic and sent an oral antibiotic home with R1 for the next day. Stated R1 does not use an anti-fungal cream. Stated staff picked up the oral antibiotic on 08/27/2024 and it was dispensed to R1 the same day. It was determined that R1 was prescribed an oral antibiotic on 08/26/2024, the facility picked up the medication from the pharmacy on 08/27/2024 and dispensed to R1 the same day. R1 has never been prescribed or dispensed an antifungal cream. This allegation is unsubstantiated. Continued on LIC9099-C Facility is not meeting the incontinence needs of the resident - UNSUBSTANTIATED It was reported that the ER also requested that R1 wear bigger Depends because the small ones were irritating a fungal infection on their bottom. The RP states it took a week for the facility to receive the order of larger depends. LPA reviewed R1’s Physicians Report which states that R1 has a diagnosis of urinary incontinence but is able to care for their own toileting needs. Administrator stated that R1 gets their Depends through their insurance through their doctor and they are delivered once per month. R1 gets 6 packages of 20 each which are placed in R1’s room. R1 is independent and staff don’t have to help R1 with their Depends. R1 wears a size medium. The facility had some size large on hand for R1 to try but R1 complained that they were too large. R1 runs out of Depends every month and the facility purchases extras for the facility and R1 also uses those. It was determined that R1 is prescribed 6 packages of 20 Depends each month and if R1 runs out the facility provides Depends for R1. There is no mention in the ER discharge documents that R1 has a fungal infection or needs a larger size Depends. This allegation is unsubstantiated. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violations occurred, and the findings are UNSUBSTANTIATED. An exit interview was conducted. A copy of the report was provided to assistant administrator Julie Wilcox.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 12, 2024 · control 59-AS-20240917164916
Jul 29, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

07/29/2024 12:30 PM Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rebecca Knight arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a Required-1 Year inspection. LPA met with administrator Julie Wilcox and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA Knight and the administrator toured the facility together to ensure the health and safety of clients in care. Areas toured include but are not limited to twelve (12) client rooms, common areas, three and one half (3.5) bathrooms, kitchen, storage areas and office. Staff and resident files were reviewed. All employees requiring background checks are cleared. Bedding, linens, and towels for clients were observed and found to be clean and in good repair. Medication is locked in a cabinet. Administrator applied for renewal of administrator certificate in April 2024 and will send LPA a copy of their new certificate once received. The facility was observed to be at a comfortable temperature. Common area was clean and in good repair. All bedrooms had required furniture, bedding, and lighting. Bathrooms were clean and in good repair. Kitchen was clean and in good repair. Food appears to be stored and prepared properly. Facility has required (7) seven-day non-perishable and (2) day perishable supply of food. Fire extinguishers fully charged and were inspected in February 2024. Smoke detectors are all operational, are hard wired to the local fire department and serviced by Beacon Fire Alarms & Security Corporation. There are no pools/bodies of water are on premises. The facility has been conducting fire drills monthly. LPA requested copies of the following documents: LIC308 Designation of Facility Responsibility LIC500 Personnel Report In the areas toured no immediate health, safety, or personal rights violations were observed. No deficiencies are being cited as a result of today’s inspection. Exit interview conducted and copy of report was provided to administrator Julie Wilcox.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 29, 2024
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in Tehama County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Tehama County