Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Hallmark North

Small home·Licensed for 6·Redding, California

Licensed since 2018Licence #455002677
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Dementia · HospiceState licensing record · September 27, 2026
  • Starting rate$5,000 a monthListed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026
  • Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit0 of 6 beds occupiedAugust 14, 2025 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitMay 15, 2026CDSS inspection record
  • Licence holderQuality Care Home Inc.Since 2018 · 4 licensed homes

Hallmark North is a small care home in Redding — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents since 2018. Bedridden care is not on file.

Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Hallmark North

Is Hallmark North licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

How many residents is Hallmark North licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Has Hallmark North been cited?

1 Type A and 1 Type B citations since 2018, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 10 state visits over the same years.

Is Hallmark North still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Hallmark North cost?

$5,000 a month to start — listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026.

The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living shared bedroom, seen September 9, 2026.

Among 6 other homes of a similar licensed size in Redding that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,500 to $5,000 a month, and the middle figure is $4,750 (n = 6 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Hallmark North take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Quality Care Home Inc., per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. See the homes licensed to Quality Care Home Inc. — at least 3 on the state roster.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Patients' Hospital of Redding is 0.6 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Hallmark North keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Hallmark North license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “HALLMARK NORTH”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #455002677. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed to Quality Care Home Inc., per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2018, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 10 state inspection visits since 2018, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 1 Type A and 1 Type B citations on file since 2018, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 10 state visits in that period.
  • 4 complaints and 2 substantiated allegations on file since 2018, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is May 15, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 6 residents
  • Dementia / memory careApproved by the state
  • Hospice careApproved by the state
  • BedriddenNot on file · ask the home

State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER, 6 NON-AMBULATORY, HOSPICE APPROVED FOR 2.

983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA

CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation on file

    Ask: “Can we read the dementia care disclosure and discuss how daily support works?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

3 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

What it costs here

This home’s starting rate

$5,000a month to start

Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026 · See listing

Likely monthly total

$5,000a month

Likely $5,000–$5,600

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · where the price comes from
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room
  • Starting monthly rate$5,000this home

    The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living shared bedroom, seen September 9, 2026.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $5,000–$5,600
$5,000
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $5,000–$9,100
$7,000
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWhere this price comes from

The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living shared bedroom, seen September 9, 2026.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 6 nearby homes that publish a rate

Where it is

  • 920 Hallmark Dr, Redding, CA 96001Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2021, the state has filed 11 documents for this home, and its records count 10 visits since 2018. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated May 15, 2026.

On file since
2021
State visits
10
Most recent visit
May 15, 2026
Occupied · August 14, 2025 visit
0 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 4 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated December 16, 2021 to August 14, 2025. 4 of the 4 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (2), “Unsubstantiated” (2). 4 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 4 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations1typical 0
  • Type B citations1typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations2typical 0
  • Total complaints4typical 0

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2018.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202611020252212024231202311020221102021330

The last 36 months — 6 of 11 documents

20261 state visit · 1 document
May 15, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On May 15 2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sarah Benson arrived at the facility for the purpose of conducting the annual inspection. LPA met Manager Shirley Robichaux at the facility to verify no residents are living at the facility. The facility is owned by Licensee, Quality Care Home, INC. LPA observed and was informed there were no longer any residents at Hallmark North. LPA was informed the licensee intends to keep the license open at this time and possibly serve additional residents at a later date. A copy of this report was provided to Manager Shirley Robichaux, to forward to Licensee. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of the report was left with the manager. No deficiencies are being cited as a result of todays visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 15, 2026
20252 state visits · 2 documents
Aug 14, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Medication management.

On 08/14/2025 at 1:45PM Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sarah Benson, conducted an unannounced visit and met with Facility Manager Michael Moodie. The purpose of this visit was to deliver complaint findings submitted on 4-3-25. During todays visit it was discovered no residents are in care at this time. The residents were moved to Westside Assisted Living and Redbud Care Home. During the complaint investigation staff interviews were attempted and the following documents were reviewed: staff schedules, staff list with telephone numbers, residents admission agreements, medical records, hospital visits, medication records, resident daily logs and incident reports. Continued on LIC9099C & LIC9099D Substantiated LPA attempted staff interviews multiple times with no success. Document review revealed, on 3-24-25 at 7:30PM staff reported R1’s 7:00AM medication was still in medication box and not given. Document review revealed on 3-25-25 R1’s 8:00PM medication was given at 8:00 AM. Document review revealed R1’s 8:00AM medication was given at 1:00PM. Document review revealed no incident reports were submitted to Licensing concerning medication errors in March 2025. Based on investigation observations, record review(s) and interviews which were conducted the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be Substantiated. California Code of Regulations, (Title 22), is cited on the attached LIC 9099D. Appeal rights were explained and provided to the facility representative listed above and exit interview conducted. If any of the cited deficiencies are not corrected by the noted due date, civil penalties may be assessed.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 14, 2025 · control 59-AS-20250403092452

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87465(a)4) · Plan of correction due date: Sep 15, 2025

Incidental Medical and Dental Care. (a) A plan for incidental medical and dental care shall be developed by each facility. The plan shall encourage routine medical and dental care and provide for assistance in obtaining such care, by compliance with the following: (4) The licensee shall assist residents with self-administered medications as needed. This requirement is not met as exidenced by: Based on observatin and interview of Staff the licensee did not ensure residents are received medicaion as prescribed. This poses a potential health and safety risk to the residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 14, 2025

Plan of correction: Administrator will have all staff administering medicaion receive training from a professional. Administrator will perform medicaion checks bi-weekly. Administrator will send a copy with staff signatures and topices covered to LPA.

Jul 17, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On July 17, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kayla Adkison arrived at the facility for the purpose of conducting the annual inspection. Upon arrival, LPA attempted to make contact with staff at the front door however, there was no answer. LPA was contacted by Lovene Ferrell, staff at Westside Assisted Living, located across the street at 915 Hallmark Drive, Redding. Both facilities are owned by Licensee, Quality Care Home, INC. LPA was informed there were no longer any residents at Hallmark North. The licensee intends to keep the license open at this time and possibly serve additional residents at a later date. A copy of this report was provided to Lovene Farrell, Westside Assisted Living Caregiver, to forward to Licensee.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 17, 2025
20242 state visits · 3 documents
Nov 6, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Personal Rights - Resident being sexually harrassed by another resident care.

On 11/06/2024 at 1:00 PM Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sarah Benson, conducted an unannounced visit and met with Edward Eric Stadnicki Care Giver. The purpose of this visit was to deliver complaint findings. During the complaint investigation staff and resident interviews were performed and the following documents were reviewed: staff list with telephone numbers, residents admission agreements, medical records, medication administration records, PRN medication records and incident reports. Continued on LIC9099-C Unsubstantiated Document review revealed, R1 chooses to walk to R2’s room. Documents reveal R1 chooses to spend time with R2. Documents reveal R1 gets anxious when unable to see R2. Documents reveal R1 has a new medication to treat this anxiety. Document review revealed staff redirect residents when found not in own room or when touching each other. During Staff interviews it was reported that R1 gets anxious when unable to see R2. Staff reported R1 has gone to R2 room and climbed in bed with R2. When staff ask R1 to return to their own room R1 gets anxious and refuses. Staff reported the doctor has ordered anxiety medication to help R1 with anxiety concerning this matter. During staff interviews all staff stated R1 says R2 is their boyfriend. During resident interviews R1 was asked how staff help them R1 stated the staff were nice to R1 and that she is “scared for their life.” When R1 was asked to tell more about being scared for her life R1 did not respond. When R1 was ask if anyone has done anything that bothers them, R1 responded no. When R1 was ask if R2 has done anything that bothers them they responded no. When R1 was ask if they felt safe R1 said “I do, no one has ever tried to hurt me or scare me.” It is noted that R1 has been diagnosed with dementia; however, appears to be able to vocalize what their needs are. Based on investigation, observations, and interviews R1 has been found in R2 bed hugging and staff has returned R1 to own bed. The facility is taking action to keep the residents apart and discourage any type of inappropriate touching of one another. The facility has taken steps to supervise the residents closer so that either party is not receiving unwanted advances. Staff have reported when bathing a resident, it takes about ten minutes and that “takes my attention away from the other residents.” During interviews it has been discovered that R1 has not reported or indicated to staff that anyone has inappropriate touched them. It has been determined the clients are friendly toward one another with some physical contact, however there are no signs of sexual harassment. It was discovered that R1 seeks out R2 by choice and is anxious when unable to see R2. The facility has offered to move the residents but both POA’s have declined. Based on the interviews conducted the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. No deficiencies cited. Exit interview conducted and a copy of the report was provided to Staff.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 6, 2024 · control 59-AS-20241004083010
May 17, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Medication Management.

On 5-17-24, at 1:45PM Sarah Benson, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) arrived at the facility unannounced to deliver final findings regarding a complaint that was received on 02/21/24. LPA Benson met with Audra Eneix Administrator, and explained the purpose of the visit. Interviews were conducted and the following documents were reviewed: staff list with telephone numbers, residents admission agreements, medical records, medication administration records, PRN records and incident reports. continued on 9099-C Substantiated Medication Management. Document review revealed that after moving to Hallmark North home, Seroquel and Ativan were added to resident’s (R1) medication administration log for agitation. During staff interviews, it was reported that a staff person gave the resident an Ativan medication, as the resident was combative. After not calming down and approximately 30-40 minutes later, the staff person gave another type of medication, which was Seroquel. It was stated that the Seroquel was an “as needed” type of medication to calm the resident. It was reported that the resident appeared to be kind of “spacey and a little bit out of it.” It was reported in the last five years only one other resident was this agitated. During witness interviews, it was reported that on 2-10-24 a witness observed the resident in a chair with what seemed to be unconscious state, with her head bent in a way that looked painful. The witness stated when the care staff were asked about the unresponsive condition of resident, the staff responded, "I gave her the medication I was told to give her." The witness couldn't get the resident to respond appropriately, so they took the resident to the hospital where resident was diagnosed as “Over medicated.” Witness reported concern of residents overall sedated condition while in care at the facility. Witness stated previous to living at the facility the resident had been walking one to two miles daily. During the investigation process, it was determined that the facility staff administered the medication as prescribed by the physician; however, when the resident was taken to the hospital it was reported she was over medicated. The staff did not respond with appropriate assistance when observing the resident slumped over and barely responsive. The allegation is substantiated. Based on interviews and evidence obtained during the investigation, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore, the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, (Title 22), is being cited on the attached LIC9099D. Exit interview conducted, a copy of the report, and appeal rights provided to administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 17, 2024 · control 59-AS-20240221141404

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87466 · Plan of correction due date: Jun 17, 2024

87466 The licensee shall ensure that residents are regularly observed for changes in physical, mental and emotional health and that appropriate assistance is provided...This requirement is not met as exidenced by: Based on observatin and interview of Staff the licensee did not ensure that 1 of 5 residents were regulary observed for changes in physical functioning and that appropriate assistance was provided. This poses a potential health and safety risk to the residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 17, 2024

Plan of correction: Administrator shall have a training of this regulation for staff then contact LPA by POC due date of 6-17-24. Training of carestaff for administratration of medications (PRN) included. Training for carestaff for redirecting residents with behaviors.

May 17, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 05/17/2024 at 11:30 AM Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sarah Benson arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a Required-1 Year inspection. LPA met with administrator Audra Eneix (cert #6043287740 exp.1-25-25) and explained the purpose of the visit. Administrator certificate is current. LPA Benson and administrator toured the facility together to ensure the health and safety of residents in care. Areas toured include but are not limited to five (5) resident rooms, common areas, three (3) bathrooms, kitchen, storage areas and back yard. In the areas toured no immediate health, safety, or personal rights violations were observed. Staff and resident files were reviewed. Medications were also reviewed. Medication is locked in a locked closet. The common area was clean and in good repair. All bedrooms had required furniture, bedding, and lighting. The bathrooms were clean and in good repair. The kitchen was clean and in good repair. Cooking/dining equipment and utensils were present. Food appears to be stored and prepared properly. Facility has required (7) seven-day non-perishable and (2) day perishable supply of food. The facility was observed to be at a comfortable temperature. First aid kit fully stocked and ready for emergency use. Fire extinguisher fully charged. Smoke detectors are all operational. Hot water temperature measured within required Title 22 regulations of 105 degrees F and 120 degrees F. All employees requiring background checks are cleared. There is a schedule of activities planned for the clients. All required postings are displayed within the facility. A pools/bodies of water is on the premises with required fence and gate. No firearms are on premises. The last disaster drill was conducted and documented on 5-2-24, the facility has been conducting drills every 3 months. Exit interview conducted and copy of report was provided to administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 17, 2024
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Who holds the licence

Quality Care Home Inc., licensed since 2018, operates 4 licensed homes in California. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in Shasta County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Shasta County