Small home · Licensed for 6 · Moreno Valley

Foothill Lake Home

24746 Morning Mist Drive, Moreno Valley, CA 92557Licensed since 2015

Overview

Estimated starting rate

$4,350 a month

Covelight estimate · likely $3,550–$5,350 See costs

No openings reported

Approved by the state: Wheelchair · Dementia · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · October 26, 2026
Licensed for 6: a small care homeThe state license record

Ask this home

Check availability

Request a tour

More days

AskThe cost, or your own question

Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.

Care and support

Wheelchairup to 5 residents
Dementia
Hospiceup to 2 residents
Bedriddenup to 1 resident

Approved by the state · State licensing record · October 26, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording

1 AMBULATOY, 5 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 1 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. BR1 FOR BEDRIDDEN, BR2 FOR STAFF & BR5 FOR 1 AMBULATORY ONLY. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR TWO.

983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA

CDSS record, verbatim · October 26, 2026

As needs change

Staying through hospice
Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 2 — care may continue at the end of life
State licensing record · October 26, 2026
If memory loss develops
Dementia-care designation on file
State licensing record · October 26, 2026

We’ll ask for you. Not on file for Foothill Lake Home: two-person transfers or a lift, who is awake overnight and help with medicines. When we check availability, we ask about these too.

Check availability

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$4,350a month to start

Likely $3,550–$5,350

From 8 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Monthly cost breakdownWith a shared room and basic help · room, care and fees$4,350likely a month

Room

Daily care

Sharing the room

Starting monthly rate$4,350likely $3,550–$5,350
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 8 small homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600
Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (44 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).
One-time move-in fee$2,500one time · likely $0–$4,000
Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,500 (133 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $3,550–$5,550: $4,350
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,200–$8,750: $6,850

How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance

MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.

If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers

Rates at nearby homes8 nearby homes publish starting rates of $3,500 to $5,500

8 homes like this within 5 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,500–$5,050.

Sunnymead Home CareMoreno Valley · 0.5 mi · Small home
$3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
Warbler RCFEMoreno Valley · 1.8 mi · Small home
$5,000Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
St Francis VillaMoreno Valley · 1.8 mi · Small home
$4,329Listed on Seniorly · assisted living studio · seen September 9, 2026
Honors Way Care HomeMoreno Valley · 3.5 mi · Small home
$3,800Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
Our LegacyMoreno Valley · 3.6 mi · Small home
$4,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
Rancho Belago Residential CareMoreno Valley · 4.6 mi · Small home
$3,600Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
My Second Home - Assisted LivingRiverside · 4.8 mi · Small home
$5,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
Casa Del Sol ResidentialMoreno Valley · 4.9 mi · Small home
$3,800Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026

How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 8 small homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.

Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask

The care level
Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.
What is billed separately
Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.
Move-in costs
A one-time move-in fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.
Increases
California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

Ask for the price

An estimate for planning, not a quote. A home sets the price after hearing about the care needed.

Daily life

Daily life here is not on file yet. Most small homes haven’t published it, and that says nothing about the home.

The best way to see it is a visit.

Request a tour

Where it is

24746 Morning Mist Drive, Moreno Valley, CA 92557Address from the public record · October 26, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

Riverside University Health System - Medical CenterHospital · General acute care, on the state’s list4.4 mi

Straight-line distances; check the drive or the walk. Hospital: the nearest general acute care hospital on the state’s list (CDPH, September 16, 2026).

Open directions

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

CDSS public record, read October 26, 2026 · License #336427578 · See the state’s own record

The last 36 months — 3 of 8 documents

Complaint outcomes in these 36 months, in the state’s words: 1 “Unsubstantiated”.

20262 state visits · 2 documents

Oct 13, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

We haven’t transcribed this report yet. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 17, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not ensure resident in care was provided with adequate transportation services. Staff is forcing resident in care to leave the facility.

On June 17, 2026, the California Department of Social Services/Community Care Licensing (CDSS/CCL) Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Antonine Richard conducted an unannounced complaint visit. The LPA met with the Administrator, Julita Mendoza (A1), and explained the purpose of the visit. The complaint investigations consisted of the following. On June 1, 2026, the Department obtained various documents, including the Personnel Report LIC 500 (dated 06/17/26) and the Client Roster (dated 06/17/26). The Department reviewed and collected documents for Resident 1 (R1), including the face sheet dated 12/23/2023, the Admission Agreement dated 01/05/2024, the physician's Report dated 01/08/2024, and the Medications list dated 01/05/2024. The Department interviewed the Administrator (A1), 2 staff members (S1 and S2), and 1 resident (R2), and attempted to interview 2 additional residents (R3 and R4). The Department was unable to interview Resident 1 (R1) because R1 moved out of the facility on 03/02/2024. The Department requests a copy of the Unusual Incident Report (UIR) dated 03/02/2024. Unsubstantiated Allegation #1: Staff did not ensure resident in care was provided with adequate transportation services. The complaint alleged that staff failed to arrange transportation for a resident (R1) due to R1's disabilities. On January 31, 2024, the department interviewed the Hospice worker (HW), who stated that there were no concerns regarding adequate transportation services for R1. The department also interviewed the placement agency (PA) on the same day; PA denied the allegation and asserted that transportation was provided without issue. Additionally, on January 31, 2024, the department spoke with three staff members (S1-S3), all of whom denied the allegation. They indicated that during R1's admission, it was made clear that transportation was not part of the services the facility would provide. On June 17, 2026, the department interviewed the Administrator (A1), who also denied the allegation. A1 stated that transportation to medical appointments was discussed during the client's admission to the facility. A1 mentioned that R1 was seen by Hospice Care once a week and that the Certified Home Health Aide (CHHA) visited the client three times a week. If R1 needed transportation, the CHHA would organize it. On June 17, 2026, the department interviewed two other staff members (S1 and S2), who reiterated that the facility does not provide transportation for hospice clients. However, during the same the department interviewed one resident (R2) who stated that the facility provides transportation and even takes R2 shopping upon request. The department attempted to interview two additional residents (R3 and R4) on June 17, 2026, but was unable to do so due to their health conditions. On June 17, 2026, the department's review of the admission agreement in the Basic Services, part #7, indicated that the facility will not provide transportation services; residents are responsible. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation (s) did or did not occur; therefore, the allegation is Unsubstantiated. Allegation #2: Staff is forcing a resident in care to leave the facility. The complaint alleged that if the resident (R1) could not pay, R1 would have to leave the facility by January 26, 2024. On January 31, 2024, the department interviewed R1, who denied the allegation and stated that R1 wanted to move out of the facility to obtain full-time care-giving with help from the Veterans Administration (VA). R1 also expressed a desire not to live in a shared room. On the same day, January 31, 2024, the department interviewed the Placement Agency (PA), which also denied the allegation. The PA stated that R1 had requested relocation to another facility because of a desire for 24-hour care. The PA also stated that resources were available and that relocation would occur once the process was completed. On June 17, 2026, the department interviewed the Administrator (A1), who denied the allegations and stated that R1 was unwilling to pay the full rent. On March 2, 2024, R1 called a Medical Emergency (ME) service for transport to a hospital and did not return to the facility afterward. A1 reported that they had contacted the Placement Agency regarding this incident. During the same interview, the department also interviewed two other staff members (S1 and S2), who denied that the facility would force residents to move out. A review of the facility notes confirmed that R1 went to the hospital on March 2, 2024, and did not return to the facility. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation (s) did or did not occur; therefore, the allegation is Unsubstantiated No deficiencies were cited. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of the report was provided to the Administrator, Julita Mendoza.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 17, 2026 · control 18-AS-20240126084430

20241 state visit · 1 document

Sep 11, 2024Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Janira Arreola conducted an unannounced annual required visit. LPA was granted entry and met with Staff, Julita Mendoza who was informed of the purpose of the visit. At the time of the visit there are no residents in the care. The facility is a two story home with (5) bedrooms and (3) bathrooms. The upstairs is comprised of a loft area for staff use only. No pools or firearms are being kept at the facility. Infection Control: The LPA observed hygiene supplies, PPE equipment and cleaning supplies to do regular cleaning of the facility. LPA reviewed the facility's infection control plan which met department requirements. Physical Plant: Physical plant, floors, windows, and doors were observed to be clean. Fixtures and furniture were in good repair were present. The outdoor area was observed to be free of hazards. Laundry equipment was observed to be in good working condition. The sharp and dangerous objects were observed to be locked and inaccessible. The smoke detector and carbon monoxide was operational, and the hot water temperature 105F. Food Service: LPA observed facility kitchen had the ability to prepare food in clean environment and possessed equipment in good working condition. LPA observed the facility met the required 2-day supply of perishable and 7-day supply of non-perishable foods. Record Review and Resident/Staff Files: LPA reviewed (2) staff files and training. No residents are residing in the home, no resident files were reviewed. Health Related Services/ Incidental Medical Services: Resident medication will be kept in a locked cabinet. Disaster preparedness: LPA reviewed the facility's emergency and disaster plan. LPA observed all facility exits were clear from obstructions. LPA observed emergency supplies. No deficiencies were cited at the time of the visit. An exit interview was conducted where this report was reviewed and provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 11, 2024

Earlier years2021 to 2023 · 5 documents

20232 state visits · 3 documents

Sep 21, 2023Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sara Martinez conducted an unannounced annual required visit. LPA was granted entry and met with Administrator, Julita Mendoza, who was informed of the purpose of the visit. At the time of the visit there was (1) staff and (0) resident present. The facility does not have any residents admitted due to renovations, so some items were discussed in regards to care of future residents. The facility is a two-story home with six (6) bedrooms and three (3) bathrooms, with an attached garage. The facility does not have any bodies of water, firearms, or ammunition on the property. The residents who will be served will be elderly adults 65 years of age and older. LPA conducted a tour of the interior and exterior, reviewed facility documents and conducted an interview. LPA observed the following: Infection Control: LPA observed the hand washing stations in the facility restrooms and kitchen had hand hygiene supplies and hand washing signs. LPA observed PPE equipment and cleaning supplies to do regular cleaning of the facility. Physical Plant: LPA observed the resident bedrooms, bathrooms, and staff office. Physical plant, floors, windows, and doors were observed to be clean and fixtures and furniture were in good repair and were present. The outdoor area was observed to be free of hazards. LPA observed outdoor furniture and shaded area for residents. Laundry equipment was observed to be in good working condition. The sharp and dangerous objects were locked and inaccessible to residents. The smoke detector and carbon monoxide was operational, and the hot water temperature 118F. Food Service: LPA observed facility kitchen had the ability to prepare food in clean environment and possessed equipment in good working condition. LPA observed the facility met the required 2-day supply of perishable and 7-day supply of non-perishable foods. Record Review and Resident/Staff Files: LPA reviewed one (1) staff file and training. All staff have criminal clearance and updated training along with CPR/First Aid Certification. Facility sketch, exit routes, personal rights, complaint information and emergency phone numbers were found posted in the facility. The listed administrator possesses a current administrator's certificate. Health Related Services/ Incidental Medical Services: Future resident medications will be locked in a hallway closet. Disaster preparedness: LPA reviewed the facility's emergency and disaster plan. LPA reviewed documentation showing the facility will conduct fire and earthquake drills for staff and future residents. All facility exits were clear from obstructions. Facility had emergency supplies and first aid kit with all required items. No deficiencies were cited at the time of the visit. An exit interview was conducted where a copy of this report was provided to Julita Mendoza.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 21, 2023

Feb 16, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff yells at resident

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jesse Gardner made an unannounced visit to the facility to conduct an investigation of the above allegation. LPA met with caregiver Evelyn Manuel. Administrator Julita Mendoza arrived while conducting the visit. The allegation that staff yell at residents has been investigated. Interviews revealed staff yell at residents when they become frustrated while assisting them. Staff One (S1) understands that yelling is an inappropriate method of communicating with the residents; whereas, they will never yell again when communicating with residents. Therefore this allegation is substantiated. Substantiated An exit interview was conducted where a copy of this report was discussed with and provided along with a copy of the LIC9099-D, and Appeal Rights.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 16, 2023 · control 18-AS-20230210115209

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87468.1(a)(3) · Plan of correction due date: Feb 23, 2023

Personal Rights of Residents in Facilities: (a) Residents in all residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following personal rights:(3) To be free from punishment, humiliation, intimidation, abuse, or other actions of a punitive nature, such as withholding residents’ money or interfering with daily living functions such as eating, sleeping, or elimination. This requirement was not being met as evidenced by: Based on LPA interview with staff and residents, LPA found that the Licensee did not adhere to the regulation. S1 admitted to yelling at residents when they become frustrated. This presents a potential personal rights risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 16, 2023

Plan of correction: Licensee agrees to conduct in-service training with all staff on the cited regulation and provide proof of such to LPA by POC date.

Feb 16, 2023Facility evaluation reportCase Management - DeficienciesDeficiency page: Type B

Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jesse Gardner made an unannounced visit to the facility to conduct an investigation into a complaint (18-AS-20230210115209). LPA met with caregiver Evelyn Manuel. Administrator Julita Mendoza arrived while conducting the visit. During the the tour of the facility, LPA noted these described deficiencies: 1. Door to Room #1 is coming apart at the hinges, and does not completely close. 2. Sliding closet is completely off the railing in Room #5. An exit interview was conducted where a copy of this report was provided along with a copies of the LIC809-D, and Appeal Rights.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 16, 2023

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87303 · Plan of correction due date: Feb 23, 2023

Maintenance and Operation: (a) The facility shall be clean, safe, sanitary and in good repair at all times. Maintenance shall include provision of maintenance services and procedures for the safety and well-being of residents, employees and visitors. This was not being provided as evidenced by: Based on LPA's observation, Licensee did not adhere to the regulation by the sliding closet door in Room #5 being off of the railing, as well as the door to Room #1 loose from the door frame. This presents a potential health and safety and or personal rights risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 16, 2023

Plan of correction: Licensee agrees to repair the closet in Room #5, and the door to Room #1, and provide proof of such to LPA by POC date.

20221 state visit · 1 document

Oct 21, 2022Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Yolanda Delgado made an unannounced visit to the facility to conduct an annual inspection with an emphasis on infection control. LPA arrived at 12:20 PM, LPA was met by Caregiver Evelyn Manuel and explained the purpose of the visit. Present in the facility during time of visit were one (1) staff as well as four (4) residents. There are currently no cases of COVID-19 within the facility. During today's visit, LPA toured the facility and made observations pertaining to the facility's infection control measures. LPA observed insufficient signage throughout the facility, sufficient hand hygiene supplies, sufficient cleaning and disinfecting provisions, and proper use of face coverings. The facility has a designated infection control lead person who has been tasked with tracking all COVID-19 cases and/or suspected cases, additional PPE supplies need to be maintained at the facility, cleaning and disinfection provisions are in adequate quantities, and that staff are trained in the proper use and disposal of PPE and overall infection control. The facility has a plan in place which follows Community Care Licensing guidelines for when and how long to test staff and residents for COVID-19, when and how to isolate/quarantine residents, and when to schedule cleaning and disinfection times of high traffic and frequently touched areas. The facility maintains a plan to monitor resident(s) regularly for any changes in condition and to subsequently notify the resident(s) physician and to notify all emergency agencies in the event of any COVID-19 related and/or suspected illnesses. Based on the observations made during today’s visit, two (2) Technical Assistance, no deficiencies were cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview to review this report was conducted and a copy of this report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 21, 2022

20211 state visit · 1 document

Nov 1, 2021Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff yells at a resident while in care

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) David Cuevas conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to initiate an investigation to allegation above. LPA met with caregiver, Ms. Manuel who was informed of the purpose of visit. Ms. Manuel called Administrator, Julita Mendoza who arrived at the facility shortly after. During this investigation LPA conducted records review, direct observations, and interviews with staff and residents. Regarding allegation: Staff yells at a resident while in care During visit LPA interviewed a total of (5) individuals’ available, staff and residents. Per collected interviews 5 out of 5 interviewees communicated to have no knowledge of or witnessing staff yelling at Resident # 1 (R1) while in care. Furthermore, all resident in care expressed being content with placement and to have not witness any staff yelling at any resident. Additionally, interviews with Staff # 1(S1) and staff # 2 (S2) deny any occurrence in which staff yelled at R1 or any other resident in care at facility, as such based on interviews and collected evidence, the allegation of Staff yells at a resident in care is UNFOUNDED, meaning that the allegation was false, could not have happened and/or is without reasonable basis. An exit interview was conducted where a copy of this report was discussed and provided to Administrator, Julita Mendoza. Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 1, 2021 · control 18-AS-20211026145339

3 of 6 beds were occupied at the June 17, 2026 state visit — a count on that day, not an opening.

License holder

Foothill Grand Chateau, Inc., licensed since 2015.

Operates 2 licensed homes in California. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.

Canyon Lake Terrace · Canyon Lake

The state’s totals for this licenseSince 2015, as the state’s facility page counts them

State visits on file: 9
Total complaints: 4
Substantiated allegations: 2
Type A citations: 0
Type B citations: 2

These are the state’s own totals for this license since 2015, per CDSS records. The state counts them apart from the documents above, and they can differ from what those documents show; the documents say what each visit found. One complaint can contain several allegations.

Compare with homes the same size

	This home	Typical
Type A citations	0	0
Type B citations	2	0
Substantiated allegations	2	0
Total complaints	4	0

“Typical” is the statewide median for licensed homes this size. It does not adjust for years licensed, and older licenses have had more visits and reports. The median is across the 6,916 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record. The figures compared are the state’s totals, not the documents.

What the state’s words mean

Routine visita visit the state records as “Required” — a scheduled visit, not one made in answer to a complaintSubstantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents stand in their place.

Open CDSS facility search ↗Report a record error Operate this home? Respond or correct, free →

Frequently asked questions

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Foothill Lake Home

Is Foothill Lake Home licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

How many residents is Foothill Lake Home licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

Has Foothill Lake Home been cited?

0 Type A and 2 Type B citations since 2015, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. Those records count 9 state visits over the same years.

Is Foothill Lake Home still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of November 11, 2026.

What does Foothill Lake Home cost?

$4,350 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,550–$5,350. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Among 9 other homes of a similar licensed size in Moreno Valley that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,575 to $4,372 a month, and the middle figure is $3,800 (n = 9 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Foothill Lake Home take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Foothill Grand Chateau, Inc., per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. See the homes licensed to Foothill Grand Chateau, Inc. — at least 2 on the state roster.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Riverside University Health System - Medical Center is 4.4 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Foothill Lake Home keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 2 residents, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.