Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Clearwater at North Tustin

Large community·Licensed for 124·Santa Ana, California

Licensed since 2021Licence #306006040
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Dementia · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · September 13, 2026
  • Starting rate$6,820 a monthListed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026
  • Home sizeLicensed for 124Large care community · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit116 of 124 beds occupiedAugust 11, 2026 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitAugust 11, 2026CDSS inspection record

Clearwater at North Tustin is a large care community in Santa Ana — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 124 residents since 2021.

Built from CDSS public records · September 13, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Clearwater at North Tustin

Is Clearwater at North Tustin licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

How many residents is Clearwater at North Tustin licensed for?

124 residents — a large community, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Has Clearwater at North Tustin been cited?

3 Type A and 1 Type B citations since 2021, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. Those records count 23 state visits over the same years.

Is Clearwater at North Tustin still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Clearwater at North Tustin cost?

$6,820 a month to start — listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026.

The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for memory care shared bedroom, seen September 9, 2026. We don’t have this home’s dementia-care disclosure. California requires a home that advertises dementia care to describe that care in writing when you ask.

Among 63 other homes of a similar licensed size across Orange County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,304 to $5,870 a month, and the middle figure is $4,495 (n = 63 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Clearwater at North Tustin take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Clearwater at North Tustin, LLC: Csl Berkshire Ope, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Orange County Global Medical Center is 1.9 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Clearwater at North Tustin keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 10 residents, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Clearwater at North Tustin license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “CLEARWATER AT NORTH TUSTIN”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #306006040. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • Licensed for 124 residents — a large community, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • Licensed to Clearwater at North Tustin, LLC: Csl Berkshire Ope, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2021, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 23 state inspection visits since 2021, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 3 Type A and 1 Type B citations on file since 2021, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. The same records count 23 state visits in that period.
  • 11 complaints and 4 substantiated allegations on file since 2021, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is August 11, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 124 residents
  • Dementia / memory careApproved by the state
  • Hospice careApproved · covers up to 10 residents
  • BedriddenApproved · covers up to 6 residents

State licensing record · September 13, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 124 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 6 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. APPROVED HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 10.

983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA

CDSS record, verbatim · September 13, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 10 — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 13, 2026

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation on file

    Ask: “Can we read the dementia care disclosure and discuss how daily support works?”

    State licensing record · September 13, 2026

3 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

What it costs here

This home’s starting rate

$6,820a month to start

Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026 · See listing

Likely monthly total

$6,820a month

Likely $6,820–$7,420

With a studio and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · where the price comes from
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room
  • Starting monthly rate$6,820this home

    The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for memory care shared bedroom, seen September 9, 2026. We don’t have this home’s dementia-care disclosure. California requires a home that advertises dementia care to describe that care in writing when you ask.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $6,820–$7,420
$6,820
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $6,820–$10,950
$8,820
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWhere this price comes from

The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for memory care shared bedroom, seen September 9, 2026. We don’t have this home’s dementia-care disclosure. California requires a home that advertises dementia care to describe that care in writing when you ask.

23 homes like this within 10 miles publish starting rates mostly between $2,800–$6,350.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 23 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 11901 & 11905 Newport Avenue, Santa Ana, CA 92705Address from the public record · September 13, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2021, the state has filed 20 documents for this home, and its records count 23 visits since 2021. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on August 11, 2026 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Unfounded.”

On file since
2021
State visits
23
Most recent visit
August 11, 2026
Occupied at that visit
116 of 124 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 11 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated July 7, 2022 to August 11, 2026. 11 of the 11 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (1), “Unfounded” (4), “Unsubstantiated” (6). 11 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 11 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations3typical 0
  • Type B citations1typical 1
  • Substantiated allegations4typical 2
  • Total complaints11typical 6

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,354 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2021.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20262202025330202334020227912021220

The last 36 months — 5 of 20 documents

20262 state visits · 2 documents
Aug 11, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff are not ensuring residents personal information is kept confidential

On this day, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Andrea Mendivil made an unannounced visit to conduct a complaint investigation. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. The Department received the complaint on August 3, 2026. During today's visit LPA Mendivil toured both Assisted Living and Memory Care as well as interviewed staff. Regarding the allegation Staff are not ensuring residents personal information is kept confidential, the investigation revealed the following: It was alleged that the staff are not ensuring resident's personal information is kept confidential as there was a ring camera placed in both medication rooms. LPA observed a camera placed at the far left of the celling in the assisted living medciation room, LPA also observed a sign advising that a camera is present in the room. Unfounded LPA observed a camera placed in a similar spot in the memory care medication room. LPA toured the facility and observed no additional cameras in common areas. LPA Mendivil along with Maintenance Director Alex Mora viewed the live camera stream. LPA confirmed the video stream does not contain audio recordings. LPA confirmed with Executive Director Jennifer Kornmann that only management has access to view the cameras. While viewing the cameras LPA was not able to observe any identifiable resident information. Therefore based on the preponderance of evidence through observations and interviews the allegation Staff are not ensuring residents personal information is kept confidential is determined to be UNFOUNDED, meaning that the allegations were false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 11, 2026 · control 22-AS-20260803134123
Jan 7, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff neglect led to resident sustaining pressure injuries

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alvaro Ramirez, Jr. conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the above allegation received on May 28, 2024. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and met with Administrator (AD) Jennifer Kornmann. LPA explained the reason for the visit. This Department has investigated the complaint alleging that staff neglect led to resident sustaining pressure injuries. Regarding the allegation the following was revealed: During a follow up visit on May 16, 2024, the Primary Care Physician (PCP) for R1 noticed skin breakdown to right hip. On May 16, 2024, PCP ordered Wound Care. During the course of the interviews with the PCP, the PCP stated that in May he noticed a shallow hip and requested Home Health care for a Pressure Injury 2. Per PCP, the pressure injury was not due to neglect. During the investigation LPA reviewed the Physical and Occupational therapy visits dated April and May 2024 for R1. Per email dated May 17, 2024, the PCP ordered an egg cushion for bed and sheepskin for chair to help alleviate pressure on hip. CONTINUED ON LIC9099-C... Unsubstantiated During the course of the interviews with staff, Staff 3 (S3) reported that R1 is repositioned every two hours and stated that R1 favored positioning back to his right side. Per S4, R1 did not develop a pressure injury due to staff neglect. S5 stated that R1 did not develop pressure injuries due to lack of care or staff neglect. Based on the information gathered during the investigation and review of documents obtained, LPA is unable to ascertain if the allegation occurred as reported due to conflicting information. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove or refute the alleged violation occurred; therefore, this allegation is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED. For today’s visit, there were no citations issued per Title 22, Division 6 of the California Code of Regulations. LPA conducted an exit interview with AD Kornmann, and a copy of this report was provided to the facility. Per W1, he always sees staff working hard. Regarding the allegation that staff did not allowed resident access to telephone, the following was revealed: During the investigation LPA reviewed documents including the Clearwater at North Tustin Admission Agreement dated October 28, 2022, for R1. Per Admission Agreement, under Statement of Residents' Personal Rights it states residents to have reasonable access to telephones, to both make and receive confidential calls. During the course of the interviews with residents, R1 reported that he can use the telephone at anytime. During the course of the interviews with staff, S1 through S5 reported that staff always pass the telephone calls to the residents and/or stated that the residents always have access to the telephone. Regarding the statement that facility is understaffed, LPA reviewed documents including the Clearwater at North Tustin staff schedule dated May 2024. Per staff schedule, on average there are four Caregivers and one Medication Technician (MT) for the morning and evening shifts and two Caregivers and one MT for the night shift for 32 residents in care. Therefore, the allegations are deemed UNFOUNDED, meaning the allegations are false, could not have happened and/or are without a reasonable basis. LPA Ramirez conducted an exit interview and a copy of this report was provided to the facility. Based on the information gathered during the investigation and review of documents obtained, LPA is unable to ascertain if the allegation occurred as reported due to conflicting information. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove or refute the alleged violation occurred; therefore, this allegation is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED. For today’s visit, there were no citations issued per Title 22, Division 6 of the California Code of Regulations. LPA conducted an exit interview with AD Kornmann, and a copy of this report was provided to the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 7, 2026 · control 22-AS-20240528112916
20253 state visits · 3 documents
Nov 26, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On November 26, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Brandon Lopez made an unannounced visit to the facility to conduct the required annual inspection. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility by staff after explaining the purpose for the visit. Executive Director (ED) Jennifer Kornmann was present and assisted on today's visit. LPA observed that Jennifer Kornmann has a valid Administrator certificate which expires on June 13, 2026. The facility is a Residential Care Facility for the Elderly (RCFE) licensed for one hundred and twenty four non-ambulatory residents, of which six may be bedridden, and has a hospice waiver for fifteen. The facility consists of two single-story buildings, the front building is used for assisted living residents and the back building is used for memory care residents. Each building consist of resident apartments, with bathrooms located in suite, a dining hall, multiple activity rooms, multiple storage rooms, a wellness center, a beauty salon, a medication room, and staff offices. LPA, accompanied by the ED, conducted a tour of the exterior portions of the facility. LPA observed the See Something, Say Something (PUB 475) poster mounted on the wall by the entryway of the facility. LPA inspected resident apartments in both assisted living and memory care. LPA observed resident apartments to be clear of any hazards. LPA observed resident apartments to have the required furnishings of a bed, a chair, a chest of drawers, and a lamp. Resident beds had clean linens and blankets. LPA observed additional linens to be stored in a hallway closets. LPA inspected the bathrooms in each of the residents apartments and observed them to be clean. Bathrooms were equipped with grab bars and non-skid floor mats. Faucets and toilets were operational. Hot water temperature measured between 115.5 and 119.8 degrees Fahrenheit. CONTINUED ON LIC809-C LPA inspected the commercial kitchen located in the assisted living building. LPA observed the kitchen has a two day perishable and seven day nonperishable food supply on hand. LPA observed knives and sharps to be inaccessible to residents. LPA observed the facility has a three day emergency food and water supply. LPA observed chemicals and toxins to be stored in a locked closet inaccessible to residents in care. LPA observed multiple fire extinguishers to be mounted on the walls in both buildings. Fire extinguishers were observed to be charged and serviced as of August 21, 2025. LPA observed the facility passed their most recent fire inspection visit conducted on October 21, 2025, which consisted of testing the smoke detectors, carbon monoxide detectors, and fire sprinklers. LPA observed the facility conducted their most recent emergency disaster drill on October 23, 2025. The facility has a medication room located in each building. The centrally stored medications are kept in locked medication carts in their respective buildings. LPA observed that First Aid kits are also stored in the medication rooms and they have all the required components. LPA inspected all other common areas such as the dining rooms, activity rooms, beauty salons, and wellness centers and observed them to be clear of any hazards. LPA, accompanied by the ED, conducted a tour of the exterior portion of the facility. LPA observed the facility has an outdoor area for each buildings. LPA observed the outdoor areas for each building to be free of any hazards or obstructions. LPA observed shaded outdoor seating areas with furniture for resident use. There are no bodies of water on the premises. LPA reviewed ten resident files. All the required documentation were present and current in the resident files reviewed. LPA reviewed residents’ medication and medication records. LPA reviewed ten staff files. LPA observed that Staff #3 (S3) did not complete the required twenty hours of annual training, and only had twelve hours of annual training documented for the year of 2024. All staff are background cleared and associated to the facility. Based on today's observations, a deficiency is being cited on the attached LIC809-D. An exit interview was conducted with Executive Director Jennifer Kornmann. A copy of the report and Appeal Rights were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 26, 2025
Sep 19, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff placed restrictions on residents right to have visitors and did not have privacy with visitors

On September 19, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Brandon Lopez made an unannounced visit to the facility to initiate the investigation into the allegation listed above and to deliver findings. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility by staff after explaining the purpose for the visit. Health Services Director Jasmine Barajas was notified via telephone and later arrived to assist with today's visit. Regarding the allegations that, staff placed restrictions on residents right to have visitors and did not have privacy with visitors, the following has been concluded: It was alleged that Resident #1 (R1) had restrictions on who was able to visit her and was not given privacy when she had visits on September 10, 2025, and September 11, 2025. LPA was unable to conduct an interview with R1 for this complaint due to R1 passing away on September 13, 2025. LPA interviewed four facility staff. Four out of four staff confirmed that R1's Power of Attorney (POA), provided instructions to the facility to restrict certain visitors to R1 on September 10, 2025, and September 11, 2025, due to those visitors causing distress to R1 during their visit on September 10, 2025. CONTINUED ON LIC9099-C Unfounded LPA conducted an interview with R1's POA who confirmed that he gave instructions to the facility to restrict certain visitors to R1 on September 10, 2025, and September 11, 2025, due to those visitors causing distress to R1 during their visit on September 10, 2025. LPA reviewed R1's Advance Health Care Directive dated July 15, 2021. R1's Advance Health Care Directive states that R1's POA has sole discretion to limit or prevent visitations or contacts with any individual that distresses R1 or interferes with R1's treatment, once R1 becomes incapable of making her own decisions. LPA reviewed a note from R1's Primary Care Physician (PCP) dated November 20, 2024, which states that due to R1's dementia diagnoses, R1 was incapable of making her own decisions. Therefore, R1's Advance Health Care Directive is valid, and R1's POA has authority to make decisions and place restrictions over R1's visitations, as of November 20, 2024. Based on the evidence gathered during this investigation, the complaint is UNFOUNDED, meaning that the allegation was false, could not have happened and/or is without reasonable basis. An exit interview was conducted with Health Services Director Jasmine Barajas and a copy of the report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 19, 2025 · control 22-AS-20250912152427
Jan 9, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Claudia Gutierrez and Eboni Bentley made an unannounced visit for the purpose of conducting a Required/Annual Inspection. Upon entry. LPAs were greeted by Concierge and explained the purpose of the inspection. LPAs met with Sales Manager Linda Robbins and further discussed the purpose of the inspection. Executive Director (ED) Jennifer Kornmann arrived at approximately 9:20 a.m. During the inspection, LPAs and SM conducted a tour of the inside and outside of the facility, common areas, resident rooms, and observed the following: The facility consists of two single-story buildings, the front building is used for assisted living residents and the back building is used for memory care. Each building has common areas which include, two dining areas, multiple activity rooms, a hair salon, and wellness center. Select resident rooms were inspected and all were observed to have the required furnishings. LPAs observed all resident beds had linens and blankets. Signal system was tested and observed to be operable. There are two courtyards with multiple shaded sitting areas. LPAs observed residents socializing in common areas and resting in their respective bedrooms. Bathrooms were observed to be free of debris and mildew, faucets and toilets were operational. Water temperature tested between 105.0-123.6 degrees Fahrenheit; a Technical Violation was issued on this date. LPAs observed the facility has a 2-day supply of perishables and a 7-day supply of non-perishable food as required by regulations. Smoke detectors and carbon monoxide detectors tested operational. Fire extinguishers are located in every hallway and were observed to be fully charged with service tags dated August 15, 2024. Facility appliances were inspected and observed to be operable. Toxic chemicals, cleaning solutions, and disinfectants were observed to be inaccessible to residents. (Cont. LIC809-C) Medication was observed to be centrally stored and locked in a medication cart located within the medication room. LPAs reviewed centrally stored medication for select residents and did not observe any discrepancies. LPAs reviewed ten resident files and nine staff files. LPA interviewed ten residents and five staff. Based on the observations made during today’s inspection, no deficiencies are being cited per Title 22 Division 6 of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was left at the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 9, 2025
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in Orange County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Orange County