Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

California Armenian Home

Large community·Licensed for 412·Fresno, California

Licensed since 1985Licence #100400070Medi-Cal ALW
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · HospiceState licensing record · September 13, 2026
  • Estimated starting rate$2,600 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $2,050–$3,350
  • Home sizeLicensed for 412Large care community · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit48 of 412 beds occupiedMay 6, 2026 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payMedi-Cal ALW acceptedDHCS participant list · August 9, 2026
  • Last state visitJuly 7, 2026CDSS inspection record

California Armenian Home is a large care community in Fresno — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 412 residents since 1985. Dementia care and bedridden care are not on file.

Built from CDSS public records · September 13, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about California Armenian Home

Is California Armenian Home licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

How many residents is California Armenian Home licensed for?

412 residents — a large community, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Has California Armenian Home been cited?

0 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 1985, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. Those records count 19 state visits over the same years.

Is California Armenian Home still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does California Armenian Home cost?

$2,600 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $2,050–$3,350. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 11 communities with 50 or more beds within 15 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 9 other homes of a similar licensed size in Fresno that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,049 to $4,271 a month, and the middle figure is $3,595 (n = 9 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out. What Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver covers in a care home.

Does California Armenian Home take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home appears on the DHCS participation list, August 9, 2026. Confirm eligibility and current participation with the program. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by California Home for the Aged Inc., per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Can California Armenian Home keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

California Armenian Home license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “CALIFORNIA ARMENIAN HOME”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #100400070. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • Licensed for 412 residents — a large community, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • Licensed to California Home for the Aged Inc., per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • First licensed in 1985, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 19 state inspection visits since 1985, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 1985, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. The same records count 19 state visits in that period.
  • 8 complaints and 1 substantiated allegation on file since 1985, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is July 7, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved by the state
  • Dementia / memory careNot on file · ask the home
  • Hospice careApproved by the state
  • BedriddenNot on file · ask the home

State licensing record · September 13, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
FIRE CLEARANCE APPROVED FOR ALL NON-AMBULATORY. HOSPICE WAIVER APPROVED FOR THIRTY (30).

935 - ELDERLY

CDSS record, verbatim · September 13, 2026

As needs change

  • Medicines

    Level of medication service: reminders only

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

    caring.com · 2026-09-09

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 13, 2026

3 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation not on file

    Ask: “If memory loss develops, what would change — and when would a move be needed?”

Care & day-to-day support

These are the home’s own statements about its day-to-day practice — they are not part of the state licensing record, and the state has not approved or reviewed them.

  • Level of medication serviceReminders only

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

Nights & staffing

  • Nurse coverageNurse on Staff (Part time)

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$2,600a month to start

Likely $2,050–$3,350

From 11 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$2,600a month

Likely $2,050–$3,600

With a studio and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room

Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.

  • Starting monthly rate$2,600likely $2,050–$3,350

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 11 communities with 50 or more beds within 15 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $2,050–$3,600
$2,600
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $2,500–$6,850
$4,600
How people payOn the Medi-Cal waiver list · private pay, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home appears on the DHCS participation list, August 9, 2026. Confirm eligibility and current participation with the program. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board. For a resident on SSI/SSP, California’s 2026 standard sends $1,444.07 a month to the home for room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 11 communities with 50 or more beds within 15 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

11 homes like this within 15 miles publish starting rates mostly between $2,800–$4,500.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 11 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 6720 E Kings Canyon Rd, Fresno, CA 93727Address from the public record · September 13, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2022, the state has filed 16 documents for this home, and its records count 19 visits since 1985. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on May 6, 2026 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Unsubstantiated.”

On file since
2022
State visits
19
Most recent visit
July 7, 2026
Occupied · May 6, 2026 visit
48 of 412 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 7 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated May 3, 2022 to May 6, 2026. 7 of the 7 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (1), “Unfounded” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (5). 7 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 7 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations0typical 0
  • Type B citations0typical 1
  • Substantiated allegations1typical 2
  • Total complaints8typical 6

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,354 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 1985.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20263402025240202433120232202022330

The last 36 months — 11 of 16 documents

20263 state visits · 4 documents
May 6, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not report incident to licensing. Facility call light system is inoperable. Staff did not provide residents with adequate meal service. Facility did not employ adequate staff to meet the needs of residents in care.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sarah Hurt conducted an unannounced facility visit to deliver findings on the allegations listed above. LPA met with facility Cognitive Care Director, Ashley Mendoza , and explained the purpose of today's visit. Regarding the allegation that staff did not report incident to Licensing, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) conducted interviews and reviewed facility records related to the reported resident fall incident involving resident 1.LPA reviewed a completed Unusual Incident/Injury Report documenting the resident experienced an unwitnessed fall on 01/31/2026 resulting in hospitalization. Facility records reflected the facility completed a written incident report and provided a fax cover sheet and confirmation report indicating a nine-page report was transmitted to the Licensing office on 02/05/2026 with a successful transmission result. Although the incident report was not located in the facility’s electronic Licensing file at the time of LPA review, records reviewed did not reveal sufficient evidence to support that the facility failed to report the incident to Licensing..Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. Unsubstantiated Regarding the allegation that the facility call light system is inoperable, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) conducted interviews and reviewed facility records, including paging system activity reports. Interviews conducted with staff revealed the facility uses a functioning call light system which alerts staff when residents activate pull cords. Staff stated residents are monitored throughout the day and staff respond to resident needs. Staff stated that during WiFi interruptions, staff conduct routine rounds and safety checks on residents. LPA reviewed facility records related to the call light system and observed the system was operational. Although some records reflected longer reset times, the facility staff stated this may occur when staff do not fully reset the pull cord system after responding to residents. Interviews and records reviewed did not reveal sufficient evidence to support that the call light system was consistently nonfunctional or inoperable. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. Regarding the allegation that staff did not provide residents with adequate meal service, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) conducted interviews and reviewed facility records including facility menus and alternative menu options. Interviews conducted with staff revealed the facility provides residents with three daily meals as well as alternative meal options when requested. Staff stated residents are offered substitutions if they do not prefer the meal being served and residents are encouraged to eat throughout the day. LPA reviewed facility menus which documented a variety of meal options and alternative menu selections available to residents. Interviews and records reviewed did not reveal sufficient evidence to support that residents were not being provided adequate meal service. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. Regarding the allegation that the facility did not employ adequate staff to meet the needs of residents in care, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) conducted interviews and reviewed facility staffing schedules and records. Interviews conducted with staff revealed the facility maintains staffing coverage throughout each shift and staff stated they are generally able to respond to resident needs in a timely manner. Staff acknowledged there are occasions when resident calls increase during busy periods; however, staff stated assistance is available from other staff members when needed. LPA reviewed staffing schedules and did not observe sufficient evidence to support that the facility failed to employ adequate staff to meet resident needs. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. Exit interview conducted with facility, Cognitive Care Director, Ashley Mendoza, and copy of report providedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 6, 2026 · control 24-AS-20260210143137
Mar 19, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 3/19/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M. Medina conducted an unannounced Annual Required inspection. LPA arrived, stated purpose of visit and met with Executive Director/Administrator, Paul Rocha to conduct today's inspection. . Current, facility has 117 residents who reside in Independent living, 54 residents who reside in Assisted Living, and 52 residents who reside in Cognitive Care. The main building, is a three story building which has Independent Living on first and third floor, Assisted Living is on second floor. Facility buildings toured. Each floor has a choice of dining rooms and menu options. Menus are posted throughout the facility. Kitchen toured, refrigerator was at 37 degrees F and freezers were at 0 degrees F. Facility observed to have 2-day supply of perishable and a 7-day supply of non-perishable food available. Facility receives food deliveries 3-4 times per week. Independent villas and resident apartments toured during facility tour. LPA observed apartments to have skid resistant surfaces in showers, grab bars available. Apartments toured observed to well lit, and a comfortable temperature for residents. Residents receive housekeeping in Assisted Living daily and Independent Living receive housekeeping twice weekly. The Cognitive Care building, has a separate kitchen and dining area. Residents have a open courtyard with shading and seating that is utilized for gardening and activities. Residents observed to be engaged with music and social activity during facility tour. Facility is equipped with smoke detectors, fire sprinklers, and pull stations throughout buildings. Fire extinguishers are present throughout buildings, in each hallway with a service date of 5/07/2025. LPA reviewed resident records during inspection. Due to time constraints, LPA will return to review medication, staff files and complete inspection tool. Exit interview conducted and a copy of report will be provided via e-mail for facility records.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 19, 2026
Mar 4, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Unqualified staff injecting residents with medication.

On 03/04/2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) J. Duarte arrived unannounced to deliver findings. LPA met with Administrator Paul Rocha. Interviews and documentation revealed that Med Techs assist resident with injectable medication using a hand over hand technique and LVNs also assist residents in administering injectable medication. Based on interviews conducted and documentation, the allegation: “Unqualified staff injecting residents with medication,” is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. No deficiencies issued. Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report was discussed and provided to facility Administrator Paul Rocha, whose signature on this form confirms receipt of this document. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 4, 2026 · control 24-AS-20251222095613
Mar 4, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Residents develop multiple pressure injuries due to staff neglect. Residents develop multiple UTI's due to staff neglect. Staff handle residents in a rough manner. Staff do not ensure residents' hygiene needs are being met. Staff do not provide adequate supervision to residents resulting in falls. Staff do not ensure to provide residents' with fluids.

On 03/04/2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) J. Duarte, arrived unannounced to conduct interviews and deliver findings. LPA introduced self, stated the purpose of the visit and met with Executive Director and Administrator Paul Rocha. The Department conducted interviews and reviewed records. Based on the interviews conducted and records reviewed, the allegations; residents develop multiple pressure injuries due to staff neglect, residents develop multiple UTI's due to staff neglect, staff handle residents in a rough manner, staff do not ensure residents' hygiene needs are being met, staff do not provide adequate supervision to residents resulting in falls, and staff do not ensure to provide residents' with fluids are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did occur or did not occur; therefore, the allegations are Unsubstantiated. No deficiencies were issued. An exit interview was conducted. A copy of this report was discussed and provided to Administrator Paul Rocha, whose signature on this form confirms receipt of this document. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 4, 2026 · control 24-AS-20260105161419
20252 state visits · 4 documents
Mar 4, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Annual Continuation

On 3/04/25, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) M. Medina and D. Boyd. conducted an unannounced annual required inspection. LPAs stated the purpose of the visit and were allowed entry into the facility. LPAs met with Administrator, Paul Rocha, who conducted the tour of the facility with LPAs. LPA Medina reviewed a sample of staff and resident files and observed the files to have the required documentation and staff training. LPA Boyd will document the physical plant tour and inspection tool results on a separate report. Exit interview conducted. No deficiencies cited.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 4, 2025
Mar 4, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

On 3/4/2025 Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Daiquiri Boyd and Melinda Medina made an unannounced visit to the facility. LPAs toured the new addition to the Cognitive Care building. LPA received the fire clearance on 2/21/25 which was granted by Fresno Fire Department. Fire clearance was granted for an additional 20 residents to occupy the addition to the dwelling. LPAs toured the additional living space on property. The additional space is properly furnished for the increase of 20 residents. LPA observed smoke detector and carbon monoxide detectors to be operational. Fire extinguishers were serviced on 12/18/2024. The individual rooms toured in this building are new additions and have furnishings available if needed by new residents. The new wing in cognitive care has fifteen (15) single bedrooms with a shared "Jack and Jill" style shared bathroom. The remaining five (5) bedrooms are private. Each bedroom has a sink in the entrance area. All bedrooms are equipped with call buttons. All bathrooms have built in shower chairs, grab bars, and non-skid floor surface in the shower. Bedrooms do not have built-in closets, but include an armoire with space to hang belongings. Newly built medication room with locked doors was toured. Pending review and approval by Fresno Regional Office (FRO) and Continuing Care Contracts Bureau (CCCB).the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 4, 2025
Mar 4, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Daiquiri Boyd and Melinda Medina, conducted an unannounced annual visit to the facility and met with Administrator, Paul Rocha (AD). LPA stated the purpose of the visit and was accompanied by AD while conducting the inspection of the facility grounds. This facility includes several buildings. The main building is a three story building that houses residents that are Independent Living on floors one and three and Assisted Living on the second floor. Each floor has a choice of dining facilities and menu options. Menus are provided on site and by the interactive video/TV monitors in each wing of the facility. Kitchen toured and observed to be clean and well taken care of. Refrigerator was at 37 degrees F and freezers were at 0 degrees F. There was observed to be a perishable and non-perishable food supply to feed all residents for seven days. Independent Living consists of 70 residents and Assisted Living has 55 residents. LPA observed thermostat to be at 73 degrees F. On each level of the facility main building, there is a locked Maintenance room with cleaning supplies. There is a Medication Room on the second floor that is a locked room containing movable, locked medication carts. This facility uses PointClickCare system to track the medications the residents are taking. LPAs checked water temperatures in five resident bathrooms and found it to range from 115 degrees F to 120 degrees F. LPA observed laundry rooms with keyed entry to have working washers, dryers, and cleaning supplies. Each hallway in the facility contains a video monitor that displays the menu for the day, weather, activity times for all events taking place in the facility. LPAs inspected resident bedrooms for water temperature, non-slip surfaces, lighting, grab bars, seating. Residents receive housekeeping in Assisted Living daily and Independent Living receive housekeeping twice weekly. All rooms were found to be in like new condition, properly functioning, and well maintained. The Cognitive Care building (previously Memory Care) currently houses 34 residents. This building has it's own kitchen and three dining areas. Meals prepared here are specific to this building and are prepared to enhance well being of those with cognitive issues. There are currently eight residents on hospice care. There are Independent Living Villas on the property of the facility and there are forty residents residing independently therein. LPAs toured one of the private, resident villas and found it to be newly built with new amenities and furnishings. PPE for the whole community is centrally stored in all buildings for all residents. Last fire drill with staff was conducted on 12/25/24. Fire Department inspected interior sprinkler system on 12/18/24. The semi-annual alarm inspection was done by Fresno Fire Department. on 06/18/2024. LPAs observed and reviewed Infection Control Plan and Disaster Binders, both found to be updated. LPA Medina reviewed staff and resident records and will document on a Annual Continuation report. Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report provided for facility records. No deficiencies cited during inspection.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 4, 2025
Feb 18, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

On 02/18/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Daiquiri Boyd made an unannounced visit to the facility for the purpose of conducting a check of the facility and records to verify that an employee is not employed or on the premises. Individual named Angelina Padilla has not been employed at this facility since August 30, 2023. This individual was employed at this facillity for approximately two months. CDSS No. 7924292003the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 18, 2025
20243 state visits · 3 documents
Dec 4, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Questionable death Staff left residents soiled for extended periods of time

On 12/04/24, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M. Medina conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to conduct additional interviews and deliver findings. LPA introduced self and stated purpose of visit and allowed entrance. LPA met with Executive Director/Administrator, Paul Rocha during visit. This Department investigated the allegation of questionable death and staff. During the investigation, this department obtained a copy of Resident 1 (R1) death certificate. Based on record review of R1's death certificate, it was determined R1's cause of death was respiratory arrest. Facility has Point Click Care (PCC) system that monitors and tracks all residents toileting, brief changes, and any assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs) provided by staff on shift. This Department has found that the above allegations are UNFOUNDED, meaning they were false, could not have happened, and/or were without reasonable basis. We have therefore dismissed the complaint. No deficiencies issued during this complaint visit . Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report was provided to Administrator for facility records Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 4, 2024 · control 24-AS-20240507171907
Mar 25, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analysts L. Padgett and Katie Brown (LPA), conducted an unannounced annual visit to the facility and met with Administrator, Paul Rocha (AD). LPA stated the purpose of the visit and was accompanied by AD while conducting the inspection of the facility. This facility has independent villas, a main building with independent residents on the first and third floor and Assisted Living on the second floor. Memory Care is in its own building. LPA toured the main building with AD. LPA observed ambient thermostat to be at 73 degrees F. On the first floor, LPA toured the Harvest Café. Menu is displayed on TV screen. This café serves grab and go items. Area observed to be in good condition. LPA observed Fire Side lounge area to have seating area, faux fireplace with does not emit heat and board games. This floor also has fitness room with exercise machines and free weights. Kitchen storage observed to have supply of paper goods, cleaning supplies/disinfectants and hand soap. LPA checked water in Guest/Resident bathroom, temperature was found to be 106.9. LPA observed laundry rooms with keyed entry to have working washers and dryers and cleaning supplies. In The Grape Vine kitchen LPA observed that the kitchen was well maintained, with working lights and well maintained appliances. The kitchen counters and sink are free from debris, well maintained and clean. LPA observed that refrigerator was kept at a 40 degree F, and the freezer at 2 degrees F. LPA observed a 2 day perishable food supply. The kitchen pantry was clean, organized, and had 7 days of non-perishable food. No expired food was observed. A 2nd floor kitchen was toured. Two refrigerators observed, one is kept at 38 degrees F and the other 43 degrees F. LPA observed the dining rooms on each floor. All are well lit with adequate seating. There are TV screens in the hallways which display the weather, activity calendar and events. LPA observed multiple seating and activity areas that contains games and puzzles, TV’s, coffee and ice water, bowls of fresh fruits (apples, bananas and oranges). LPA observed Activity room with piano, keyboard, tables, chairs and board games. LPA observed the hallways leading to the resident rooms, smoke detectors, and carbon monoxide are installed. A fire extinguishers are mounted on the walls and were inspected on 5/1/2023 with the correct pressure gauge as indicated on the meter. The smoke alarm and carbon monoxide detectors are tested monthly by MS Fire Protection, last inspection was on 3/12/2024. LPA observed room #206 is not shared, has a private bathroom with covered trash bin, shelves for toiletries, grab bars, non-skid flooring. The water temperature measured at 111.6 degrees F. The room is well lit, a dresser, reading lamp, the furniture is in good condition, the linens are in good condition. Room has kitchenette The bedroom has a closet, dresser and night stand. LPA observed that Room #257 is not shared, has a private bathroom with covered trash bin, shelves for toiletries, grab bars, non-skid flooring. The water temperature measured at 110.1 degrees F. The bedroom is well lit, a dresser, reading lamp, the furniture is in good condition, the linens are in good condition. The bedroom has a closet, dresser and night stand. LPA observed that bedroom #260 is not shared, has a private bathroom with covered trash bin, shelves for toiletries, grab bars, non-skid flooring. The water temperature measured at 110.8 degrees F. The rooms are well lit with required furniture in good condition. LPA with AD inspected exterior areas. LPA, observed the landscaping is well maintained, trees, bushes and grass in good condition. Patio furniture is clean and ready for use. The exterior walkways are free from obstructions and debris. LPA toured the memory care building with AD. Ambient temperature was 75 degrees F. LPA toured 4 resident rooms. Room 25 had required furniture in good condition. Fall prevention measures are in place. LPA observed resident in bed watching TV. Room 2 has a hospital bed with ½ rails, chair, dresser, TV. Resident was not in the room. Room 8 is a single room with required furnishing in good condition. LPA observed resident to be in good spirits. Water temperature was checked and observed to be 108.3 degrees F. Room #24 had required furnishing in good condition, resident was sleeping. Medication room toured. Medications are centrally stored. No insulin or refrigerated medications. Laundry room observed to have 3 washers, 2 dryers, cleaning chemicals stored in cabinets. Laundry room is kept locked with key entry. LPA observed prep kitchen in open area, nothing is stored in cabinets. Refrigerator observed to be 33 degrees F. LPA observed 6 residents in the activity area engaged in conversation. LPA observed the kitchen to be in good condition with well maintained appliances. LPA observed Dry goods and canned items, knives on magnet block. Refrigerator was 36 degrees F, Freezer 0 degrees F. LPA reviewed residents and staff records, infection control plan was not provided for review. LPA is requesting the following documents be submitted to the Fresno CCL office by 4/5/2024: Designation of Facility Responsibility (LIC308), Administrator Organization (LIC 309), Affidavit regarding Client/Resident Cash Resources (LIC 400), Liability Insurance, Emergency and Disaster Plan (LIC 610E) Personnel Report (LIC500), Register of Facility Clients/Residents for (LIC9020A)the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 25, 2024

The state marks this report as 8 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 3. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

Mar 18, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not prevent inappropriate interactions between residents

Licensing Program Analyst L. Padgett arrived unannounced to deliver amended investigative findings on the above allegation. LPA met with Paul Rocha and explained the purpose of the visit. The Department investigated the complaint alleging: Staff do not prevent inappropriate interactions between residents. During the course of the investigation the Department conducted interviews with staff and witnesses and reviewed resident and facility records, including incident reports, resident care notes, physician’s report pertaining to Residents R1 and R2. The Department determined that staff on duty did not prevent sexually inappropriate non-consensual interactions between the two residents in the Memory Care Unit. Per Department’s investigation: On 10/24/2023, in the Memory Care Unit of the facility resident R1 was found in resident R2’s bedroom; resident R2 had his arm around resident R1’s waist and resident R1 was pushing resident R2 away. Resident R2’s genitalia was exposed out of his brief. On 10/27/2023 in the Memory Care Unit of the facility staff S1 went to check on resident R2 in his bedroom and saw resident R2 sitting on his bed with resident R1 laying across Resident R2’s body. Resident R1’s pants were down to her ankles, briefs pushed to the side and R2’s fingers were inserted in R1’s genitalia. Staff S1 pulled resident R1 away and assisted resident R1 to her bedroom. Staff S1 also advised Memory Care Director (S2), but Staff S2 stated the residents had personal rights to be involved in romantic/physical relationships. Based on resident R1’s Admission Agreement, resident R1 has a power of attorney assigned and is unable to make decisions or give consent. During the Department’s interviews with Executive Director (S3) and Memory Care Director (S2); they reported these two incidents were isolated and there were no prior or subsequent incidents. However, per resident R2’s Progress Notes, there were two incidents where resident R2 was seen touching/caressing other residents in the facility. Additionally, there were two other incidents that were not documented: resident R2 had resident R1 in resident R2’s bedroom, and resident R1 was crying, and resident R2 attempted to touch another resident’s breast area. Based on the investigation conducted by the Department, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the allegation, Staff do not prevent inappropriate interactions between residents is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations (Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8) are being cited on the attached LIC 9099-D. Exit interview was conducted with Paul Rocha and appeal rights were provided. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 18, 2024 · control 24-AS-20231027143209

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87468.2(a)(8) · Plan of correction due date: Mar 22, 2024

87468.2(a)(8) In addition to the rights listed in Section 87468.1, Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities, ... for the elderly shall have all of the following personal rights: (8) To be free from neglect… intimidation, and verbal, mental, physical, or sexual abuse. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on the investigation by the Department, staff in the Memory Care Unit did not prevent resident (R1) from being inappropriately touched by R2. This posed an immediate risk to the health, safety and/or personal rights of the residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 18, 2024

Plan of correction: Plan of Correction (POC); in service training conducted with staff on Mandating Reporting/Residents Rights was submitted by Licensee by as requested.No further action is required.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87211(a)(1)(D) · Plan of correction due date: Mar 25, 2024

This deficiency was dismissed due to granted appealthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 18, 2024
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

Find a detail about life at this home.

Rooms & the spaces they will use

  • Kitchenette in the unit

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Outdoor spaceGarden

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Housekeeping

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Salon or barber

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

Meals, preferences & familiar food

  • Meals are cooked in the home's own kitchen

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Family may eat with the resident

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

Faith, culture & language

  • Languages spoken by caregiversEnglish

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

Pets, routines & independence

  • Residents may bring a pet

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Pet types the home excludesSmall dogs

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

Visiting & staying involved

  • Transport for group outings

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in Fresno County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Fresno County