Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Cedarbrook Memory Care Community

Large community·Licensed for 68·Fresno, California

Licensed since 2014Licence #107206749
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · September 13, 2026
  • Starting rate$3,600 a monthListed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026
  • Home sizeLicensed for 68Large care community · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit58 of 68 beds occupiedJune 17, 2025 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitJune 18, 2026CDSS inspection record

Cedarbrook Memory Care Community is a large care community in Fresno — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 68 residents since 2014. Dementia care is not on file.

Built from CDSS public records · September 13, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Cedarbrook Memory Care Community

Is Cedarbrook Memory Care Community licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

How many residents is Cedarbrook Memory Care Community licensed for?

68 residents — a large community, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Has Cedarbrook Memory Care Community been cited?

0 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2014, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. Those records count 30 state visits over the same years.

Is Cedarbrook Memory Care Community still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Cedarbrook Memory Care Community cost?

$3,600 a month to start — listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026.

The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for memory care, seen September 9, 2026. We don’t have this home’s dementia-care disclosure. California requires a home that advertises dementia care to describe that care in writing when you ask.

Among 8 other homes of a similar licensed size in Fresno that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $2,898 to $4,348 a month, and the middle figure is $3,495 (n = 8 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Cedarbrook Memory Care Community take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Fresno Memory Care, LLC, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Is there a hospital nearby?

San Joaquin Valley Rehabilitation Hospital is 0.8 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Cedarbrook Memory Care Community keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Cedarbrook Memory Care Community license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “CEDARBROOK MEMORY CARE COMMUNITY”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #107206749. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • Licensed for 68 residents — a large community, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • Licensed to Fresno Memory Care, LLC, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2014, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 30 state inspection visits since 2014, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2014, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. The same records count 30 state visits in that period.
  • 10 complaints and 0 substantiated allegations on file since 2014, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is June 18, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved by the state
  • Dementia / memory careNot on file · ask the home
  • Hospice careApproved by the state
  • BedriddenApproved by the state

State licensing record · September 13, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER, AMBULATORY OR NON-AMBULATORY. BEDRIDDEN FIRE CLEARANCE GRANTED FOR EIGHT (8) IN ROOMS 13, 15, 17 AND 19 ONLY. HOSPICE WAIVER GRANTED FOR TWENTY (20).

935 - ELDERLY

CDSS record, verbatim · September 13, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 13, 2026

4 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation not on file

    Ask: “If memory loss develops, what would change — and when would a move be needed?”

Nights & staffing

  • Nurse coverageNurse on Staff (Part time)

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

What it costs here

This home’s starting rate

$3,600a month to start

Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026 · See listing

Likely monthly total

$3,600a month

Likely $3,600–$4,200

With a studio and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · where the price comes from
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room

Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.

  • Starting monthly rate$3,600this home

    The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for memory care, seen September 9, 2026. We don’t have this home’s dementia-care disclosure. California requires a home that advertises dementia care to describe that care in writing when you ask.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $3,600–$4,200
$3,600
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $3,600–$7,700
$5,600
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWhere this price comes from

The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for memory care, seen September 9, 2026. We don’t have this home’s dementia-care disclosure. California requires a home that advertises dementia care to describe that care in writing when you ask.

10 homes like this within 9 miles publish starting rates mostly between $2,900–$4,400.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 10 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 1425 E. Nees Ave, Fresno, CA 93720Address from the public record · September 13, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2021, the state has filed 30 documents for this home, and its records count 30 visits since 2014. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated June 18, 2026.

On file since
2021
State visits
30
Most recent visit
June 18, 2026
Occupied · June 17, 2025 visit
58 of 68 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 10 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated April 20, 2022 to June 17, 2025. 10 of the 10 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Unfounded” (2), “Unsubstantiated” (8). 10 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 10 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations0typical 0
  • Type B citations0typical 1
  • Substantiated allegations0typical 2
  • Total complaints10typical 6

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,354 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2014.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202622020255702024780202355020225702021110

The last 36 months — 18 of 30 documents

20262 state visits · 2 documents
Jun 18, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Incident

On 06/18/2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M Vega arrived at the facility unannounced visit to conduct Case Management visit. LPA was greeted by receptionist and stated the purpose of the visit. LPA met with Executive Director (ED) - Emily Venegas. This case management visit is being conducted for an Special Incident Report (SIR) dated 05/26/2026, LPA reviewed resident progress notes and discussed fall assessments with ED. LPA obtained documentation to ensure proper interventions are being implemented regarding falls. No deficiencies were cited. Special Incident Report (SIR) dated 06/05/2026, Incident reported R1 was sent to the ER and was diagnosed with an infection. Interview with ED disclosed that there was a hospital error regarding medication that facility was able to catch and correct. R1 was observed with a high fever on 06/06/2026 and was sent out per facility LVN request per charting notes. No deficiencies cited. At this time, the case management visit does not require follow up based on documentation provided by ED to LPA. No deficiencies cited during todays visit. Exit interview completed with Executive Director. A copy of this report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 18, 2026
Apr 30, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 04/30/2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M Vega arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct Required Annual Inspection. LPA was greeted by receptionist and stated the purpose of the visit. LPA met with Executive Director (ED) - Emily Venegas. LPA conducted tour of facility with ED. A sample of residents’ files were reviewed to have updated emergency contact, Admission agreement, Needs and Services Plan and Pre-Appraisal Plan. A sample of staff files was reviewed. Staff files were observed to have current First Aid/CPR, Health screening, and Personnel records. Staff are fingerprinted clear and associated to the facility. Residents were observed thought the facility, Residents also observed watching television, other residents were walking some sitting in different parts of the facility. Some residents were in dining area waiting for lunch and another resident was getting a haircut. Facility courtyard was toured and observed to be free from debris. There was outdoor shaded seating available for the residents. The facility was observed to be at a comfortable temperature, clean, in good repair, and no passageway obstructions or fire hazards observed. Fire extinguisher was observed with a service date of 07/18/2025. Dining area and Kitchen were toured. An adequate supply of perishable and non-perishable food was observed to be properly stored in walk-in freezer, walk-in refrigerator, and pantry. Refrigerator temperature was maintained at 32 degree F. and freezer was maintained at 0 degree F. Continuation on LIC 809C LPA toured a sample of resident bedrooms. Residents' rooms were observed with adequately furnished with bed, dresser, and adequate lighting. Hot water temperature tested at 114.9 degrees F. LPA observed securely fastened grab bars and non-skid mat in all shower areas. Medications were stored in a locked medication room in a medication cart. Medications records were reviewed in Electronic Filing system. First Aid Kit was stored in medication room and observed with all required items. LPA toured laundry room and observed chemicals were stored and inaccessible to residents in care. Community Care Licensing (CCL) is always striving to have facility files that reflect the most accurate and up to date information for your facility. In an effort to maintain your facility file, please submit the most current and complete forms and/or information as identified below: Residential Care Facility for the Elderly (RCFE) LIC 308 Designation of Facility Responsibility LIC 309 Administrative Organization LIC 400 Affidavit Regarding Client/Resident Cash Resources LIC 402 Surety Bond LIC 500 Personnel Report LIC 610E Emergency And Disaster Plan For Residential Care Facilities For The Elderly LIC 9020 Register of Facility Clients/Residents Copy of current Liability Insurance Copy of current Administrator Certificate Alternate contact information including name, telephone number, & email address. Continuation on LIC 809C Please submit the above forms/information to Fresno CCL by: 05/14/2026 As an operator of a Community Care Licensed facility it is your responsibility to be aware of and in compliance with all regulations, including Chaptered Legislation. Go to www.ccld.ca.gov to stay updated and informed. No deficiencies issued during this inspection. An exit interview was conducted with the ED A copy of this report was given to ED whose signature on this form confirms receipt of these reports.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 30, 2026
20255 state visits · 7 documents
Dec 23, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Incident

On 12/23/25 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), M Vega to conduct an unannounced case management visit. LPA met with Business Office Manager - Narissa Rodriguez and conducted facility tour with Business Office Manager. This case management visit is being conducted for a Special Incident Report (SIR) dated 10/26/2025, need clarification regarding Resident 1(R1) and Resident 2 (R2) interaction on 10/26/2025, LPA will request the following: (R1 and R2: 602A and 625 needs and services, both residents). At this time this case management does not need further review. Business Office Director was informed that additional documentation maybe needed. No deficiencies cited during todays visit. Exit interview completed with Business Office Manager - Narissa Rodriguez. A copy of this report was provided for facility records.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 23, 2025
Aug 15, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

On 08/15/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M Vega arrived at the facility unannounced visit to provide updated license to facility. LPA was greeted by receptionist and stated the purpose of the visit. LPA met with Executive Director (ED) - Emily Venegas. LPA provided updated license to facility. Old license was recovered by LPA to be returned to RO. No deficiencies issued during this visit. A copy of this report was given to the Executive Director (ED) - Emily Venegas, whose signature on this form confirm receipt of this report.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 15, 2025
Jun 17, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Licensee does not ensure that staff has a criminal clearance

On June 17, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M Vega conducted an unannounced inspection at the facility and met with Executive Director (ED) - Emily Venegas. The purpose of the visit was to open a complaint investigation and deliver findings regarding the above allegation. It was alleged that the facility Licensee does not ensure that staff has a criminal clearance. Based on record review it has been determined that the facility does ensure that staff has a criminal clearance, it is determined the allegation is unfounded. This agency has investigated the complaint alleging “Licensee does not ensure that staff has a criminal clearance” We have found that the complaint was unfounded, meaning that the allegation was false, could not have happened or is without a reasonable basis. We have found that the complaint was unfounded, therefore we have dismissed the complaint. Unfounded No deficiencies were observed and cited during this visit. Exit interview conducted. A report was signed, and a copy of this report was provided for facility records.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 17, 2025 · control 24-AS-20250612152957
Apr 21, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff are not permitting resident to leave the facility

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M Vega conducted a case management investigation visit to the facility. During the course of this investigation LPA reviewed facility files relevant to the complaint investigation. It was determined that the above allegation: Staff are not permitting resident to leave the facility is UNFOUNDED. Resident 1 (R1) and residents are permitted to leave facility under the supervision for resident safety. R1 during investigation was out with family member, documented proof demonstrates multiple outings. Other residents were on a field trip outside the facility as well. Staff 1 (S1) demonstrated the check in and check out process for residents and responsible party. This agency has investigated the complaint alleging (Staff are not permitting resident to leave the facility). We have found that the complaint was unfounded, meaning that the allegations were false, could not have happened and/or are without a reasonable basis therefore we have dismissed the complaint. Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 21, 2025 · control 24-AS-20250204154917
Apr 21, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 04/21/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M Vega arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct Required Annual Inspection. LPA was greeted by receptionist and stated the purpose of the visit. LPA met with Executive Director (ED) - Emily Venegas. LPA conducted tour of facility with ED. Residents were observed thought the facility, some residents were in room 118 and room 143 playing bingo. Residents also observed in room 140 watching television, other residents were walking some siting in different parts of the facility. Other residents were observed to be coming back from a trip outside the facility. The facility was observed to be at a comfortable temperature, clean, in good repair, and no passageway obstructions or fire hazards observed. Fire extinguisher was observed with a service date of 7/11/2024. Dining area and Kitchen were toured. An adequate supply of perishable and non-perishable food was observed to be properly stored in walk-in freezer, walk-in refrigerator, and pantry. Refrigerator temperature was maintained at 32 degree F. and freezer was maintained at 0 degree F. LPA toured a sample of resident bedrooms. Residents' rooms were observed with adequately furnished with bed, dresser, and adequate lighting. Hot water temperature tested at 114.9 degrees F. LPA observed securely fastened grab bars and non-skid mat in all shower areas. Medications were stored in a locked medication room in a medication cart. Medications records were reviewed in Electronic Filing system. First Aid Kit was stored in medication room and observed with all required items. LPA toured laundry room and observed chemicals were stored and locked. Continuation on LIC 809C Facility courtyard was toured and observed to be free from debris. There was outdoor seating available for the residents. A sample of residents’ files were reviewed to have updated emergency contact, Admission agreement, Needs and Services Plan and Pre-Appraisal Plan. A sample of staff files were reviewed. Staff files were observed to have current First Aid/CPR, Health screening, and Personnel record. Staff are fingerprinted clear and associated to the facility. An exit interview was conducted with the ED. The following documents are requested and submitted to Fresno CCL by: 05/02/25 : LIC 308 Designation of Facility Responsibility LIC 500 Personnel Report LIC 610E Emergency Disaster Plan For Residential Care Facilities For The Elderly LIC 9020 Register of Facility Clients/Residents Copy of current Administrator Certificate No deficiencies issued during this inspection. A copy of this report was given to the Executive Director (ED) - Emily Venegas, whose signature on this form confirm receipt of this report.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 21, 2025
Apr 21, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Incident

Case management made out to the facility due to received incident report from facility regarding medication errors with residents and caregiver involved with the incident. Discussed with Executive Director (ED) - Emily Venegas concerns involving this matter. Executive Director (ED) - Emily Venegas did provide documentation of Training conducted with staff right after the incident occurred. Records do show past incidents of medication, ED stated that there is zero tolerance policy for medication errors. Since incident reported to CCL staff person has been put on notice. Facility has taken steps to prevent medication errors, resident was monitored and there were no adverse reactions reported. LPA M Vega discussed the issue with Executive Director. No deficiencies cited at this time since facility and facility personnel took the necessary and crucial steps in ensuring proper resident care and supervision. Resident doctors were notified along with resident responsible parties with incidents and was well documented and sent into CCL by appropriate due date of reporting time frames. Follow up has been done with resident doctors as well.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 21, 2025
Jan 9, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Incident

LPA M Vega conducted case management visit to follow-up on an incident report submitted to licensing,LPA spoke with Executive Director - Emily Venegas about incident, in which it was reported that Client #1 was administered a medication during the PM medication pass. Staff #1 reported this immediately and the client's Physician was notified. Client was placed on observation with no issues observed. Resident's responsible party was also notified. Kayleen - Regional Nurse stated that Staff #1 was was disciplined and retrained on medication administration. Kayleen (RN) stated that staff is has taken this additional in person training. Resident was not reported to have had any adverse reactions. Copy of training was provided to LPA. No deficiencies were cited because immediate and appropriate action was taken. A copy of this report was provided to Executive Director.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 9, 2025
20247 state visits · 8 documents
Nov 26, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M Vega arrived unannounced to conduct a Case Management visit on 11/26/2024. LPA met with facility front desk Staff 1 (S1), Executive Director Kayleen August was contacted and arrived a few minutes later, Stated the purpose of visit to Executive Director Kayleen August. LPA served Decision and Order excluding Staff 2 (S2) from being present inside the facility. LPA requested a current and updated Personnel Report (LIC 500) and Guardian account be updated to remove S2 from the facility staff roster. A notice of completion shall be submitted to Community Care Licensing (CCL). LPA informed Executive Director Kayleen August that S2 is not allowed to be employed and/or on any facility premises. The Decision and Order of Exclusion From All Facilities came into effect as of 11/25/2024 upon receipt of the letter. A copy of the letter was given to facility Executive Director Kayleen August during this visit. Per California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8, no deficiencies were observed and cited. Exit interview held with Executive Director Kayleen August, A Copy of report given.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 26, 2024
Oct 4, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff is not correctly administering medications

On 10/04/2024 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M Vega arrived unannounced to deliver findings on the above allegations. LPA met with Sarah Dennis - Executive Director and Samantha Keith - Director of Resident Services, stated the purpose of the visit. Allegation: Staff is not correctly administering medications. Based on observation and records review R1 received medication as listed in Central Medications Records Log. LPA requested to review medications. Samantha Keith reviewed medications with LPA. Per review no issues with medication found. Although these allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are Unsubstantiated. A copy of the report was provided to the licensee, No deficiencies issued, exit interview conducted. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 4, 2024 · control 24-AS-20240823132720
Oct 4, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not ensure resident’s catheter is properly maintained.

On 10/04/2024 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M Vega arrived unannounced to deliver findings on the above allegations. LPA met with Sarah Dennis - Executive Director and Samantha Keith - Director of Resident Services, stated the purpose of the visit. Allegation: Staff do not ensure resident’s catheter is properly maintained. LPA conducted interview with R1 observed R1 ambulating and with no hose that would pose fall risk. Reviewed records for R1: Based on R1 facility notes, the monitoring of catheter is recorded. R1 Service Plan also indicates that, R1 has been on home health since admission. Although these allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are Unsubstantiated. A copy of the report was provided to the licensee, No deficiencies issued, exit interview conducted. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 4, 2024 · control 24-AS-20240827154040
Sep 26, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff keep resident's restrooms locked. Staff are not providing residents with adequate food portions. Staff are not providing residents drinking water. Staff do not ensure resident's grooming needs are being met. Staff are not providing residents with activities.

On 09/26/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) V. Gorban visited the facility to deliver findings. During this visit LPA met with Samantha Keith Director of Resident Services, stated the purpose of the visit. During this visit LPA toured the facility inside and out, observed clients in care, and discused allegations with DRS. Allegation: Staff keep resident's restrooms locked. Based off observations and interviews on 7/18/24 during facility visit resident’ s room restrooms checked and found unlocked for use. Allegation: Staff are not providing residents with adequate food portions. Based of observation, staff interview and records review R1 received three meals a day and additionally provided regular snacks which were documented by facility staff. Report continues on attached LIC9099-C Unsubstantiated Allegation: Staff are not providing residents drinking water. Facility staff documented regular checks on R1 and also maintained a hydration log. Hydration checks were conducted every hour. Allegation: Staff do not ensure resident's grooming needs are being met. Based of staff interviews and observation and records review during the visit on 7/18/24 the facility provided shower to residents as scheduled. Allegation: Staff are not providing residents with activities. Based of records review facility providing daily activities to residents in care. During the facility visit and observation on 7/18/24 R1 was offered and refused to attend activity that day. The facility activities schedule is updated weekly and posted on the wall in main hallway for review for visitors. Although these allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are Unsubstantiated. A copy of the report was provided to the licensee via email and exit interview conducted.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 26, 2024 · control 24-AS-20240718061012
May 21, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Incident

On 5/21/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) V Gorban visited the facility to conduct case management to he incident that occurred on 5/11/2024 with resident (R1). During this visit LPA met with Administrator, Sarah Denis stated the purpose of the visit. During this visit LPA toured the facility conducting safety check and interviewed staff and Administrator. Based on incident report provided to Licensing on 5/17/24, R1 increased lethargy and decreased in responsiveness. Per report, based on that observation the facility contacted responsible party at 1645. Per report, responsible party did not agree to sent R1 out for evaluation. Per report, at 17:37 EMS was assessing R1 at the facility. During this visit LPA requested additional facility files for review. No deficiency was cited during this visit Exit interview conducted, report signed and copy provided for facility records.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 21, 2024
Apr 3, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 04/03/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) V Gorban arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct Required Annual Inspection. LPA was greeted by receptionist and stated the purpose of the visit. LPA met with Administrator (AD) Sarah Dennis, certification number 6050734740 and expiration date 2/04/2025. LPA conducted tour of facility with AD. Residents were observed at the facility during breakfast and in common areas. The facility was observed to be at a comfortable temperature, clean, in good repair, and no passageway obstructions or fire hazards observed. Fire extinguisher was observed with a service date of 006/06/2023. Dining area and Kitchen were toured. An adequate supply of perishable and non-perishable food was observed to be properly stored in walk-in freezer, walk-in refrigerator, and pantry. Food is delivered twice a week on Mondays and Thursdays. Refrigerator temperature was maintained at 32-degree F. and freezer was maintained at 0-degree F. LPA toured a sample of resident bedrooms. Residents' rooms were observed with adequately furnished with bed, dresser, and adequate lighting. Hot water temperature tested at 106 degrees F. LPA observed securely fastened grab bars and non-skid mat in all shower areas. Medications were stored in a locked medication room in a medication cart. Medications records were reviewed in AugustHealth. First Aid Kit was stored in medication room and observed with all required items. LPA toured laundry room and observed chemicals were stored and locked. Facility courtyard was toured and observed to be free from debris. There was outdoor seating available for the residents. Report continues on LIC809-C A sample of residents’ files were reviewed to have updated emergency contact, Admission agreement, Needs and Services Plan and Pre-Appraisal Plan. A sample of staff files were reviewed. Staff files were observed to have current First Aid/CPR, Health screening, and Personnel record. Staff are fingerprinted clear and associated to the facility. An exit interview was conducted with the AD. The following documents are requested and submitted to Fresno CCL by: 04/10/24 : · LIC 308 Designation of Facility Responsibility · LIC 500 Personnel Report · LIC 610E Emergency Disaster Plan For Residential Care Facilities For The Elderly · LIC 9020 Register of Facility Clients/Residents · Copy of current Administrator Certificate · Alternate contact information including name, telephone number, & email address. No deficiencies issued during this inspection. A copy of this report was given to the AD, whose signature on this form confirm receipt of this report.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 3, 2024
Feb 26, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Incident

On 02/26/24, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) V Gorban conducted a case management deficiency visit to the facility. LPA introduce self, stated the purpose of the visit, and met with Samantha Keith, Director of Resident Services. The purpose of the visit is to address an incident that occurred where R1 went AWOL on 02/17/24. The facility was unaware when R1 AWOL the facility. Residents file review stated resident is dementia and unable to leave facility unassisted. Therefore, as a result, a deficiency is being cited, per California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, see attached 809D. An exit interview was conducted. A copy of this report and appeal rights was provided to Director of Resident Services, whose signature confirms receipt of this report.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 26, 2024

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87413(a)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Feb 27, 2024

87413(a) In each facility (2) Care and supervision of residents shall be provided without physical or verbal abuse, exploitation or prejudice. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on interview and record review, staff did not provide care and supervision when memory care R1 left the facility unsupervised on 02/17/24 at unknown time or approximately 8:38 PM. The facility was not aware R1 went AWOL until approximately at 10:15 PM Fresno PD notified the facility. This is poses an immediate health and safety risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 26, 2024

Plan of correction: Administrator and Director of Resident Services offered to provide staff training / in-service, also ensure that facility doors are locked and secured correctly. Deficiency was cleared at the time of the visit.

Jan 4, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Incident

On 01/04/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Gorban conducted a case management in response to incident report regional office received on 09/14/23. LPA Gorban met with facility Administrator Sarah Dennis, stated the purpose of the visit, and was allowed entry into the facility. During this visit LPA Gorban toured the facility inside and out, observed residents in care and reviewed residents’ facility files. LPA discussed with administrator following. Based on department file review facility failed in timely manner, following Title 22, to notify Licensing within seven days incident occurred. Continuation of this report will be issued during this visit on LIC809-D. Exit interview conducted. Report signed and a copy of this report with appeal rights provided to administrator for facility records.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 4, 2024

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87211(a)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Jan 5, 2024

87211 Reporting Requirements. (1) A written report shall be submitted to the licensing agency and to the person responsible for the resident within seven days of the occurrence of any of the events specified below. This was not observed as evidenced by: Facility failed to submit incident report in timely manner to Licensing, which posses potential safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 4, 2024

Plan of correction: By plan of correction facility will ensure to review and follow title 22, reporting requirements and submit to LPA by email written statement 01/05/24.

20231 state visit · 1 document
Dec 28, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not assist resident with obtaining medical care

On 12/28/23 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) V Gorban visited facility stated above to deliver findings. LPA met with Director of Resident Services, Samantha Keith, explained the purpose of the visit. LPA toured facility inside and out, observed residents in care and discussed findings to allegations. Administrator was notified of Licensing visit. Allegation: Staff did not assist resident with obtaining medical care. During this investigation LPA reviewed facility records, interviewed staff, and Administrator. Facility records and witnesses confirmed that medical care was provided to resident in need. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is Unsubstantiated. Exit interview conducted, no citations were issued during this visit. Visit report signed and copy of this report provided for facility records. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 28, 2023 · control 24-AS-20231002141122

The state marks this report as 3 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 1. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

Find a detail about life at this home.

Pets, routines & independence

  • Residents may bring a pet

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in Fresno County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Fresno County