Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Beth Haven

Large community·Licensed for 59·Ripon, California

Licensed since 1990Licence #390312809
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · HospiceState licensing record · September 27, 2026
  • Estimated starting rate$3,950 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $3,050–$5,000
  • Home sizeLicensed for 59Large care community · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit44 of 59 beds occupiedApril 28, 2025 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitAugust 31, 2026CDSS inspection record

Beth Haven is a large care community in Ripon — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 59 residents since 1990. Dementia care and bedridden care are not on file.

Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Beth Haven

Is Beth Haven licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

How many residents is Beth Haven licensed for?

59 residents — a large community, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Has Beth Haven been cited?

2 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 1990, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 24 state visits over the same years.

Is Beth Haven still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Beth Haven cost?

$3,950 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,050–$5,000. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 15 communities with 50 or more beds within 25 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 12 other homes of a similar licensed size across San Joaquin County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $2,873 to $4,495 a month, and the middle figure is $4,073 (n = 12 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Beth Haven take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Bethany Home Society of San Joaquin County, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Kaiser Foundation Hospital Modesto is 5 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Beth Haven keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Beth Haven license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “BETH HAVEN”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #390312809. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed for 59 residents — a large community, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed to Bethany Home Society of San Joaquin County, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • First licensed in 1990, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 24 state inspection visits since 1990, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 2 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 1990, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 24 state visits in that period.
  • 2 complaints and 2 substantiated allegations on file since 1990, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is August 31, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 59 residents
  • Dementia / memory careNot on file · ask the home
  • Hospice careApproved by the state
  • BedriddenNot on file · ask the home

State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
LICENSED TO SERVE 59 NON-AMBULATORY RESIDENTS AGES 60 AND ABOVE. HOSPICE WAIVER APPROVED FOR 5. FIRE CLEARED FOR LOCKED PERIMETERS FOR BUILDINGS B & C.

935 - ELDERLY

CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

4 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation not on file

    Ask: “If memory loss develops, what would change — and when would a move be needed?”

Care & day-to-day support

These are the home’s own statements about its day-to-day practice — they are not part of the state licensing record, and the state has not approved or reviewed them.

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$3,950a month to start

Likely $3,050–$5,000

From 15 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$3,950a month

Likely $3,050–$5,200

With a studio and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room

Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.

  • Starting monthly rate$3,950likely $3,050–$5,000

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 15 communities with 50 or more beds within 25 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $3,050–$5,200
$3,950
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $3,750–$8,300
$5,950
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 15 communities with 50 or more beds within 25 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

15 homes like this within 25 miles publish starting rates mostly between $2,950–$5,100.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 15 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 368 S. Wilma Ave., Ripon, CA 95366Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2021, the state has filed 23 documents for this home, and its records count 24 visits since 1990. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated August 31, 2026.

On file since
2021
State visits
24
Most recent visit
August 31, 2026
Occupied · April 28, 2025 visit
44 of 59 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 2 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated February 15, 2024 to April 28, 2025. 2 of the 2 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (1). 2 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 2 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations2typical 0
  • Type B citations0typical 1
  • Substantiated allegations2typical 2
  • Total complaints2typical 6

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,354 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 1990.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202645020253402024791202311020222302021110

The last 36 months — 18 of 23 documents

20264 state visits · 5 documents
Aug 31, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Legal/Non-compliance

On 08/31/26, Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Melina Oropeza made an unannounced case management visit to this facility. LPA was met by the facility designated Administrator, Janet Johns. A brief interview was conducted with the facility designated Administrator at this time. Current census was 38 residents. 15 residents in Memory Care and 23 residents in Assisted Living. The purpose of this case management visit was to conduct a quarterly visit as outlined from the Non Compliance Conference held on 03/04/2024 and the requirement to have increased monitoring at that time. The focus of this quarterly visit was to review the following items that were initially brought forth on 03/04/2024: Ensure all staff are compliant with all required training Maintain adequate facility staffing Uphold all Personal Rights of the Residents Maintain and conduct Personal Rights training and verification for new and existing employees Facility designated Administrator must maintain oversight of facility staff for proper care and supervision Make sure that this facility is following all Reporting Requirements Updating policies and procedures for resident fall risks Make sure that facility staff are always seeking timely medical attention Update and maintain Needs/Appraisal Training for all staff Maintain and train all care staff on proper documentation for the facility Communication Log LPA was also present today to follow up on incident reports that were submitted for the following residents in care: R1 R2 R3 There were no deficiencies observed or cited during today's case management visit. Exit Interview was conducted with designated administrator, Janet Johns and copies of report were left with designated administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 31, 2026
May 7, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Legal/Non-compliance

Unannounced case management visit made out to this facility on 05/07/2026 by Licensing Program Analysts (LPA'S) Kesha Lewis and Melina Oropeza who was met by the facility designated Administrator, Janet Johns, at this time. A brief interview was conducted with the facility designated Administrator at this time. Current census was 38 residents. The purpose of this case management visit was to conduct a quarterly visit as outlined from the Non Compliance Conference held on 03/04/2024 and the requirement to have increased monitoring at that time. The focus of this quarterly visit was to review the following items that were initially brought forth on 03/04/2024: Ensure all staff are compliant with all required training Maintain adequate facility staffing Uphold all Personal Rights of the Residents Maintain and conduct Personal Rights training and verification for new and existing employees Facility designated Administrator must maintain oversight of facility staff for proper care and supervision Make sure that this facility is following all Reporting Requirements Updating policies and procedures for resident fall risks Make sure that facility staff are always seeking timely medical attention Update and maintain Needs/Appraisal Training for all staff Maintain and train all care staff on proper documentation for the facility Communication Log There were no deficiencies observed or cited during today's case management visit. Exit Interviewthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 7, 2026
Feb 2, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: POC

Unannounced Plan of Correction visit made out to this facility on 02/02/2026 by Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Charlie Yang. This LPA was met by the facility designated Administrator Janet Johns. A brief interview was conducted with the facility designated Administrator at this time. Current census was 38 residents. The purpose of this visit was to follow up on the deficiencies that were cited from a prior case management visit conducted on 01/05/2026. This visit was to follow up on the Plan of Correction that was due. The following deficiency was observed and cited on 01/05/2026: In addition to paragraph (1), training requirements shall also include an additional 20 hours annually, eight hours of which shall be dementia care training, as required by subdivision (a) of Section 1569.626, and four hours of which shall be specific to postural supports, restricted health conditions, and hospice care, as required by subdivision (a) of Section 1569.696. This training shall be administered on the job, or in a classroom setting, or both, and may include online training. Plan of Correction clearance letter was printed and a copy was provided to the facility designated Administrator at this time. There were no further deficiencies observed or cited during today's Plan of Correction visit. Exit Interviewthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 2, 2026
Jan 5, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Unannounced annual visit made out to this facility on 01/05/2026 by Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Charlie Yang who was met by the facility designated Administrator, Janet Jones, who was briefly interviewed at this time. It was learned that there were residents under the care of hospice at this time while other residents were receiving services through home health as well. This facility does have a hospice waiver approved for (5) residents and a program, on file, for dementia care unto the residents at any given time. Current census was 41 residents, of which, 29 were in the Assisted Living building (Building A). The other 12 residents, of which (7) were living in Building B and another (5) in Building C were considered as Memory Care. A tour of this facility was conducted alongside the facility designated Administrator Janet Jones. Administrator certificate was observed to be present and in compliance at this time for facility designated Administrator Janet Jones. Kitchen area was toured. Cabinets and drawers were reviewed. Food preparation stations, dishwashing station, and other areas intended for meal preps were toured. Food supply was reviewed for adequate 2-day perishable and 7-day nonperishable quantities at this time. This LPA did observe additional food storage units which were present and functional at this time. A tour of the dining area, living area, and all other areas intended for resident use was conducted. Medication rooms, located in each building, were reviewed. Policies and procedures involving dispensing, documenting, and overall administration of resident medications were discussed with the facility designated medication technicians at this time. The medication carts were observed to be locked and made inaccessible to the residents at this time. A tour of the resident bedrooms and restroom was conducted. Furniture and furnishings were observed to be sufficient and able to meet the needs of the residents at this time. It was learned that there were only private and semi-private living arrangements for residents on the Assisted Living portion of this facility. Hot water temperatures were taken and measured to make sure that they were within the allowed range of 105-120 degrees. Linen closet, located in the facility laundry area, was observed to contain a sufficient supply of towels, blankets, and linens to meet the needs of the residents at this time. A tour of the Memory Care buildings, Building B and C, was conducted. Fire extinguishers, located throughout this facility, were observed to have been annually inspected on 05/07/2025 by the local fire extinguisher company, Cisco Fire Sprinklers Inc., and in compliance at this time. First aid kits were observed to be present and contained all of the required components at this time. Exterior grounds of this facility were toured. A review of the facility perimeter fence, side gates, and exits was conducted. A review of (7) facility resident files was conducted and noted on the following LIC 858. A review of (7) facility personnel files was conducted and noted on the following LIC 859. The following forms and documents were requested to be updated and submitted into CCL: LIC 308 LIC 400 LIC 500 LIC 610 The following deficiencies were observed and cited on the following LIC 809-D pursuant to Title 22 Rules and Regulations, Health and Safety Codes. Appeal Rights were printed and a copy was given to the facility designated Administrator at this time. Exit Interviewthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 5, 2026
Jan 5, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Legal/Non-compliance

Unannounced case management visit conducted on 01/05/2026 by Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Charlie Yang who was met by the facility designated Administrator Janet Jones. A brief interview was conducted with the facility designated Administrator at this time. Current census was 41 residents. The purpose of this case management visit was to follow up, with quarterly visits, and inquire about the requirements that were laid out from the office meeting for the non compliance conference which took place back on 03/04/2024. The following items were required to be maintained in compliance while this facility was under increased monitoring with quarterly visits: Maintain adequate facility staffing Uphold all Personal Rights of the Residents Maintain and conduct Personal Rights training and verification for new and existing employees Facility designated Administrator must maintain oversight of facility staff for proper care and supervision Make sure that this facility is following all Reporting Requirements Updating policies and procedures for resident fall risks Make sure that facility staff are always seeking timely medical attention Update and maintain Needs/Appraisal Training for all staff Maintain and train all care staff on proper documentation for the facility Communication Log This LPA was also present today to follow up on several incident reports that were recently submitted for the following residents in care: R1 R2 R3 There were no deficiencies observed or cited during today's case management visit. Exit Interviewthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 5, 2026
20253 state visits · 4 documents
Jun 18, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Legal/Non-compliance

Unannounced case management visit conducted on 06/18/2025 by Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Charlie Yang who was met by the facility designated Administrator Jose Ventura. A brief interview was conducted with the facility designated Administrator at this time. Current census was 42 residents. The purpose of this case management visit was to follow up, with quarterly visits, and inquire about the requirements that were laid out from the office meeting for the non compliance conference which took place back on 03/04/2024. The following items were required to be maintained in compliance while this facility was under increased monitoring with quarterly visits: Maintain adequate facility staffing Uphold all Personal Rights of the Residents Maintain and conduct Personal Rights training and verification for new and existing employees Facility designated Administrator must maintain oversight of facility staff for proper care and supervision Make sure that this facility is following all Reporting Requirements Updating policies and procedures for resident fall risks Make sure that facility staff are always seeking timely medical attention Update and maintain Needs/Appraisal Training for all staff Maintain and train all care staff on proper documentation for the facility Communication Log This LPA was also present today to follow up on several incident reports that were recently submitted for the following residents in care: R1 R2 There were no deficiencies observed or cited during today's case management visit. Exit Interviewthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 18, 2025
Apr 28, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not ensure that resident was treated with dignity and respect Staff falsified incident report Staff speak inappropriately to residents Staff do not ensure that resident's medication is refilled in a timely manner

Unannounced complaint visit made out to this facility on 04/28/2025 by Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Charlie Yang who was met by the facility designated Administrator, Jose Ventura, who was briefly interviewed at this time. Current census was 44 residents. The purpose of this visit was to deliver the findings of this investigation to this facility, and it's designated Administrator, at this time. Based on interviews conducted during the course of this investigation, it was learned that R1 has been a resident at this facility for over a year. It was learned that basic care and supervision was provided to R1 as outlined in their plan of care since R1's admission to this facility. Based on interviews, it was learned that there was an incident that took place at this facility involving R1 and R1's family member. During this incident, it was learned that R1 and R1's family member got into a verbal argument resulting in the family member leaving R1's room seeking the counsel of the facility designated Administrator who was present at the time of this incident. It was learned that the facility designated Unsubstantiated Administrator was not directly present in the resident room when the incident took place but did respond and was present to intervene and did overhear the loud voices and strained conversation at that time. It was learned that the police were called and were present to look into this matter since physical violence was alleged at that time. Based on a review of the forms and documents conducted, it was learned that law enforcement did not have sufficient evidence to support the allegations of physical violence and did not take any further actions against any parties that were present during the time of this incident. In addition, law enforcement did not find any evidence that violations were being carried out against the personal rights and dignity of any facility residents at that time. It was learned that law enforcement did not find any evidence that any person, staff or family member, were speaking in a tone or manner which was deemed to be inappropriate at that time. Based on a review of the facility forms and documents, it was learned that the incident reports were filled out and contained all of the required details in relation to this incident which took place in the early part of January 2025. This information was compared to the testimonies of all persons who were present at that time and it was observed to conform to their accounts of the events that took place at that time. Based on a review of the facility medication administration records, it was learned that the medications for R1 were being properly ordered, documented, and dispensed at this time. Based on interviews conducted, it was learned that persons close to R1 felt that this facility was doing their best to meet the demands for R1 even though they felt that it was challenging at times. It was learned that these persons were content with the care and supervision that was being provided to R1 at this time and did not have any complaints. As a result of this investigation, this Department found the allegations to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. A complaint allegations finding of Unsubstantiated meant that although the allegations may have happened or were valid, there was not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violations occurred. There were no deficiencies observed or cited at this time. Exit Interviewthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 28, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250311123231
Jan 31, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Unannounced annual visit made out to this facility on 01/31/2025 by Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Charlie Yang and Regional Manager (RM) Stephenie Doub who was met by the facility designated Administrator, Jose Ventura, who was briefly interviewed. It was learned that there were residents under the care of hospice at this time while other residents were receiving services through home health as well. This facility does have a hospice waiver approved for (5) residents and a program, on file, for dementia care unto the residents at any given time. Current census was 42 residents, of which, 26 were in the Assisted Living building (Building A). The other 16 residents, of which (8) were living in Building B and another (8) in Building C were considered as Memory Care. A tour of this facility was conducted alongside the facility designated Administrator Jose Ventura. Administrator certificate was observed to be present and in compliance at this time for facility designated Administrator Jose Ventura. Kitchen area was toured. Cabinets and drawers were reviewed. Food preparation stations, dishwashing station, and other areas intended for meal preps were toured. Food supply was reviewed for adequate 2-day perishable and 7-day nonperishable quantities at this time. This LPA did observe additional food storage units which were present and functional at this time. A tour of the dining area, living area, and all other areas intended for resident use was conducted. Medication rooms, located in each building, were reviewed. Policies and procedures involving dispensing, documenting, and overall administration of resident medications were discussed with the facility designated medication technicians at this time. The medication carts were observed to be locked and made inaccessible to the residents at this time. A tour of the resident bedrooms and restroom was conducted. Furniture and furnishings were observed to be sufficient and able to meet the needs of the residents at this time. It was learned that there were only private and semi-private living arrangements for residents on the Assisted Living portion of this facility. Hot water temperatures were taken and measured to make sure that they were within the allowed range of 105-120 degrees. Linen closet, located in the facility laundry area, was observed to contain a sufficient supply of towels, blankets, and linens to meet the needs of the residents at this time. A tour of the Memory Care buildings, Building B and C, was conducted. Fire extinguishers, located throughout this facility, were observed to have been annually inspected on 05/06/2024 by the local fire extinguisher company, Cisco Fire Sprinklers Inc., and in compliance at this time. First aid kits were observed to be present and contained all of the required components at this time. Exterior grounds of this facility were toured. A review of the facility perimeter fence, side gates, and exits was conducted. A review of (10) facility resident files was conducted and noted on the following LIC 858. A review of (10) facility personnel files was conducted and noted on the following LIC 859. The following forms and documents were requested to be updated and submitted into CCL: LIC 308 LIC 400 LIC 500 LIC 610 There were no deficiencies were observed or cited during today's annual visit. Exit Interviewthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 31, 2025
Jan 31, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Legal/Non-compliance

Unannounced case management visit conducted on 01/31/2025 by Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Charlie Yang and Regional Manager (RM) Stephenie Doub who was met by the facility designated Administrator Jose Ventura. A brief interview was conducted with the facility designated Administrator at this time. Current census was 42 residents. The purpose of this case management visit was to follow up, with quarterly visits, and inquire about the requirements that were laid out from the office meeting for the non compliance conference which took place on 03/04/2024. The following items were required to be maintained in compliance while this facility was under increased monitoring with quarterly visits: Maintain adequate facility staffing Uphold all Personal Rights of the Residents Maintain and conduct Personal Rights training and verification for new and existing employees Facility designated Administrator must maintain oversight of facility staff for proper care and supervision Make sure that this facility is following all Reporting Requirements Updating policies and procedures for resident fall risks Make sure that facility staff are always seeking timely medical attention Update and maintain Needs/Appraisal Training for all staff Maintain and train all care staff on proper documentation for the facility Communication Log There were no deficiencies observed or cited during today's case management visit. Exit Interviewthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 31, 2025
20247 state visits · 9 documents
Nov 21, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Incident

Unannounced case management visit conducted on 11/21/2024 by Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Charlie Yang who was met by the facility designated Administrator Jose Ventura. Current census was 43 residents. The purpose of this case management visit was to follow up from a complaint investigation that was conducted involving a resident sustaining an injury while in care. After the investigation was conducted, with a review of the evidence that was obtained, this facility was found to be "Unsubstantiated" for the following allegation: Neglect/Lack of Care: Due to staffs' neglect, resident sustained multiple fractures. In addition, this case management visit was conducted to follow up, with quarterly visits, and inquire about the requirements that were laid out from the office meeting for the non compliance conference which took place on 03/04/2024. The following items were required to be maintained in compliance while this facility was under increased monitoring with quarterly visits: Maintain adequate facility staffing Uphold all Personal Rights of the Residents Maintain and conduct Personal Rights training and verification for new and existing employees Facility designated Administrator must maintain oversight of facility staff for proper care and supervision Make sure that this facility is following all Reporting Requirements Updating policies and procedures for resident fall risks Make sure that facility staff are always seeking timely medical attention Update and maintain Needs/Appraisal Training for all staff Maintain and train all care staff on proper documentation for the facility Communication Log There were no deficiencies observed or cited during today's case management visit. Exit Interviewthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 21, 2024
Sep 23, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

Unannounced case management visit conducted on 09/23/2024 by Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Charlie Yang who was met by the facility designated Administrator Jose Ventura. Current census was 37 residents. The purpose of this case management visit was to follow up and inquire about recent incident reports in regards to facility residents and their related care. An interview was conducted with the facility designated Administrator Jose Ventura in regards to these incident reports involving R1 and R2 at this time. There were no deficiencies observed or cited during today's case management visit. Exit Interviewthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 23, 2024
Jul 10, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Legal/Non-compliance

Unannounced case management visit conducted on 07/10/2024 by Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Charlie Yang who was met by the facility designated Administrator Jose Ventura. A brief interview was conducted with the facility designated Administrator at this time. Current census was 37 residents. The purpose of this case management visit was to follow up, with quarterly visits, and inquire about the requirements that were laid out from the office meeting for the non compliance conference which took place on 03/04/2024. The following items were required to be maintained in compliance while this facility was under increased monitoring with quarterly visits: Maintain adequate facility staffing Uphold all Personal Rights of the Residents Maintain and conduct Personal Rights training and verification for new and existing employees Facility designated Administrator must maintain oversight of facility staff for proper care and supervision Make sure that this facility is following all Reporting Requirements Updating policies and procedures for resident fall risks Make sure that facility staff are always seeking timely medical attention Update and maintain Needs/Appraisal Training for all staff Maintain and train all care staff on proper documentation for the facility Communication Log There were no deficiencies observed or cited during today's case management visit. Exit Interviewthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 10, 2024
Mar 4, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Office

A Noncompliance Conference (NCC) was conducted today on 03/01/2024, via Microsoft Teams. The purpose of the NCC was to discuss the Substantiated complaint of a violation of personal rights. Present at today’s NCC were the Regional Office Manager Stephenie Doub, Licensing Program Manager (LPM) Liza King, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Charlie Yang, and facility designated Administrator, Jose Ventura, Kathy Lazernik (Facility Nurse), Cindy Scheublein (Executive Director) . The administrative process was explained during this meeting and the facility designated Administrator was informed that further citations may result in Administrative Action. The focus of the concerns at this time: Facility staffing Personal Rights of the Residents Personal Rights training and verification Maintaining continued compliance Oversight of facility staff for proper care and supervision Reporting Requirements Updating policies and procedures for resident fall risks This facility and the facility designated Administrator agreed to the following: Complete and submit the LIC 500 for the most current staff, shifts, and coverage for designated shift leads Complete and submit the LIC 308 Complete and submit the LIC 309, as well as, the most updated documents from the Secretary of State filing for this corporation Complete and submit proof of most recent training in the areas of Resident Personal Rights, Resident Care, and Resident Supervision. Proof of submission to include name of trainer, topics covered with duration of training, and list of all attendees Complete and submit proof of most recent training for proper completion of the LIC 624 for all staff by 03/11/2024 Complete and submit proof of most recent training for fall prevention and updated policies and procedures for all staff by 03/11/2024 Exit Interviewthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 4, 2024
Feb 29, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: POC

Unannounced Plan of Correction visit made out to this facility on 02/29/2024 by Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Charlie Yang. This LPA was met by the facility designated Administrator Jose Ventura. A brief interview was conducted with the facility designated Administrator at this time. Current census was 43 residents. The purpose of this visit was to follow up on the deficiencies that were cited from a prior visit conducted on 02/15/2024 and to follow up on the Plan of Correction. The following deficiencies were observed and cited on 02/15/2024: Residents in all residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following personal rights: To have their representatives regularly informed by the licensee of activities related to care or services, including ongoing evaluations, as appropriate to their needs. The licensee shall ensure that residents are regularly observed for changes in physical, mental, emotional and social functioning and that appropriate assistance is provided when such observation reveals unmet needs. When changes such as unusual weight gains or losses or deterioration of mental ability or a physical health condition are observed, the licensee shall ensure that such changes are documented and brought to the attention of the resident's physician and the resident's responsible person, if any. This facility did complete the Plan of Correction and provided all of the required forms and documents at this time. Plan of Correction clearance letters were printed and copies were provided to the facility designated Administrator at this time. There were no further deficiencies observed or cited during today's Plan of Correction visit. Exit Interviewthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 29, 2024
Feb 15, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility did not seek timely medical care for resident Staff did not notify resident's authorized representative of injury.

Unannounced complaint visit made out to this facility on 02/13/2024 by Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Charlie Yang who was met by the facility designated Administrator Jose Ventura. A brief interview was conducted with the facility designated Administrator at this time. Current census was 43 residents. The purpose of this complaint visit was to deliver the findings from this investigation to this facility, and its representatives, in regards to the above allegations. Based on interviews conducted throughout the course of this investigation, it was learned that resident R1 sustained a fall while participating in an indoor activity. It was learned that R1 attempted to stand up during a facility supervised game and rolled R1's ankle. This fall took place on 10/17/2023. Based on a review of the forms and documents related to R1's fall that took place on 10/17/2023, several facility staff notated that R1's left ankle was swollen. These notes were observed to have been documented on 10/19/2023, 10/22/2023, 10/23/2023, 10/24/2023, and 10/25/2023. It was learned that R1 was not taken to see a licensed medical professional for an evaluation until almost 2 weeks later on 10/30/2023. Substantiated Based on interviews conducted, it was learned that this incident was not reported to the responsible parties for R1 when R1 initially sustained the fall on 10/17/2023 and was suffering with a swollen left ankle. It was learned that the responsible parties were not made aware of the incident and reason for the hospital visit until the actual date of the appointment on 10/30/2023. It was further learned that this facility, and it's representatives, admitted that there was a breakdown in communication with R1 and R1's responsible parties in connection to this fall that took place on 10/17/2023 and they should have been informed in a timely manner. As a result of this investigation, this LPA found the allegations to be SUBSTANTIATED - A finding that the complaint was Substantiated meant that the allegations were valid because the preponderance of the evidence standard had been met. The following deficiencies were observed and cited on the following LIC 9099-D pursuant to Title 22 Rules and Regulations, Division 6 and Health and Safety Codes. Appeal rights were printed and a copy was left with the facility designated Administrator at this time. This incident is currently under review and a future civil penalty may apply based on 1569.49(f) H&S. Failure to correct the deficiencies may also result in civil penalties as well. Exit Interview Based on a review of the medical records, it was not discovered that R1 had suffered a fracture of R1's left foot until 10/30/2023 when R1 was taken to the hospital by R1's responsible party. An x-ray was performed since R1's left ankle was swollen and it was discovered that R1 had, in fact, suffered a fracture of the distal fibula in R1's left foot. Since almost two weeks had elapsed before this x-ray was performed, it was not definitive whether the initial fall on 10/17/2023 was the leading cause for the fracture since medical treatment was not sought at the time of the fall at this facility. As a result of this investigation, this Department found the allegation to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. A complaint allegation finding of Unsubstantiated meant that although the allegation may have happened or was valid, there was not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. There were no deficiencies observed or cited at this time. Exit Interviewthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 15, 2024 · control 27-AS-20231103103214

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87468.1(a)(8) · Plan of correction due date: Feb 22, 2024

Residents in all residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following personal rights: To have their representatives regularly informed by the licensee of activities related to care or services, including ongoing evaluations, as appropriate to their needs. This facility was found to be deficient as evidenced by a records review in which this facility, and it's representatives and staff, did not properly notify the responsible parties of a resident who sustained an injury posing an immediate threat to the Health, Safety, and Personal Rights of residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 15, 2024

Plan of correction: The facility designated Administrator stated that all facility personnel will undergo, and complete, training on the topic of Proper Reporting Requirements for no less than (1) hour in duration. A statement of correction, along with proof of training, will be completed and submitted into CCL by the due date. Proof of training will include name of trainer, topic, and list of attendees from this facility.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87466 · Plan of correction due date: Feb 22, 2024

The licensee shall ensure that residents are regularly observed for changes in physical, mental, emotional and social functioning and that appropriate assistance is provided when such observation reveals unmet needs. When changes such as unusual weight gains or losses or deterioration of mental ability or a physical health condition are observed, the licensee shall ensure that such changes are documented and brought to the attention of the resident's physician and the resident's responsible person, if any. This facility was found to be deficient as evidenced by a records review in which this facility, and it's representatives and staff, did not properly seek medical attention after a resident sustained an injury which posed an immediate threat to the Health, Safety, and Personal Rights of the residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 15, 2024

Plan of correction: The facility designated Administrator stated that all facility personnel will undergo, and complete, training on the topic of Observation of the Resident for no less than (1) hour in duration. A statement of correction, along with proof of training, will be completed and submitted into CCL by the due date. Proof of training will include name of trainer, topic, and list of attendees from this facility.

Feb 15, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: POC

Unannounced Plan of Correction visit made out to this facility on 02/15/2024 by Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Charlie Yang. This LPA was met by the facility designated Administrator Jose Ventura. A brief interview was conducted with the facility designated Administrator at this time. Current census was 43 residents. The purpose of this visit was to follow up on the deficiencies that were cited from a prior visit conducted on 01/29/2024 and to follow up on the Plan of Correction. The following deficiencies were observed and cited on 01/29/2024: All individuals shall be residential care facility for the elderly certificate holders prior to being employed as an administrator. (1) Applicants who possess a valid Nursing Home Administrator license, issued by the California Department of Public Health, shall be exempt from completing an approved Initial Certification Training Program and taking a written exam, provided the individual completes twelve (12) hours of classroom instruction in the following Core of Knowledge areas: (A) Four (4) hours of instruction in laws, regulations, policies, and procedural standards that impact the operations of residential care facilities for the elderly, including but not limited to the authority referenced in this Chapter. Staff providing care shall receive appropriate training in first aid from persons qualified by such agencies as the American Red Cross. This facility did complete the Plan of Correction and provided all of the required forms and documents at this time. Plan of Correction clearance letters were printed and copies were provided to the facility designated Administrator at this time. There were no further deficiencies observed or cited during today's Plan of Correction visit. Exit Interviewthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 15, 2024
Jan 29, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Unannounced annual visit made out to this facility on 01/29/2024 by Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Charlie Yang who was met by the facility designated Administrator, Jose Ventura, who was briefly interviewed. It was learned that there were residents under the care of hospice at this time while other residents were receiving services through home health as well. This facility does have a hospice waiver approved for (5) residents and program on file for dementia care unto the residents at any given time. Current census was 43 residents, of which, 27 were in the Assisted Living building (Building A). The other 16 residents, of which (8) were living in Building B and another (8) in Building C were considered as Memory Care. A tour of this facility was conducted alongside the facility designated Administrator Jose Ventura. Administrator certificate was observed to be present and in compliance at this time for facility designated Administrator Jose Ventura. Kitchen area was toured. Cabinets and drawers were reviewed. Food preparation stations, dishwashing station, and other areas intended for meal preps were toured. Food supply was reviewed for adequate 2-day perishable and 7-day nonperishable quantities at this time. This LPA did observe additional food storage units which were present and functional at this time. A tour of the dining area, living area, and all other areas intended for resident use was conducted. Medication rooms, located in each building, were reviewed. Policies and procedures involving dispensing, documenting, and overall administration of resident medications were discussed with the facility designated medication technicians at this time. The medication carts were observed to be locked and made inaccessible to the residents at this time. A tour of the resident bedrooms and restroom was conducted. Furniture and furnishings were observed to be sufficient and able to meet the needs of the residents at this time. It was learned that there were only private and semi-private living arrangements for residents on the Assisted Living portion of this facility. Hot water temperatures were taken and measured to make sure that they were within the allowed range of 105-120 degrees. Linen closet, located in the facility laundry area, was observed to contain a sufficient supply of towels, blankets, and linens to meet the needs of the residents at this time. A tour of the Memory Care buildings, Building B and C, was conducted. Fire extinguishers, located throughout this facility, were observed to have been annually inspected on 05/05/2023 by the local fire extinguisher company, Cisco Fire Sprinklers Inc., and in compliance at this time. First aid kits were observed to be present and contained all of the required components at this time. Exterior grounds of this facility were toured. A review of the facility perimeter fence, side gates, and exits was conducted. A review of (7) facility resident files was conducted. A review of (7) facility personnel files was conducted. The following forms and documents were requested to be updated and submitted into CCL: LIC 308 LIC 400 LIC 500 LIC 610 The following deficiencies were observed and cited on the following LIC 809-D pursuant to Title 22 Rules and Regulations, Health and Safety Codes. Appeal Rights were printed and a copy was given to the facility designated Administrator at this time. Exit Interviewthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 29, 2024
Jan 29, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

Unannounced case management visit made out to this facility on 01/29/2024 by Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Charlie Yang who was met by the facility designated Administrator, Jose Ventura, who was briefly interviewed. It was learned that there were residents under the care of hospice at this time while other residents were receiving services through home health as well. This facility does have a hospice waiver approved for (5) residents and program on file for dementia care unto the residents at any given time. Current census was 43 residents, of which, 27 were in the Assisted Living building (Building A). The other 16 residents, of which (8) were living in Building B and another (8) in Building C were considered as Memory Care. The purpose of this case management visit was to discuss the recent submission of Special Incident Reports (SIR) into CCL that were reviewed by this LPA. This discussion was held with the facility designated Administrator Jose Ventura at this time. It was learned that policies and procedures were put into place to address the issues from the SIRs. It was learned that certain staff were re-trained while other staff were subject to disciplinarian action after an investigation was completed. Exit Interviewthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 29, 2024
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

Find a detail about life at this home.

Rooms & the spaces they will use

Meals, preferences & familiar food

Activities & the rhythm of a day

  • Activity types offeredActivities On-site

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Religious services off site

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in San Joaquin County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore San Joaquin County