Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Be Well Senior Living II

Small home·Licensed for 6·Tarzana, California

Licensed since 2013Licence #197608381Medi-Cal ALW
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · September 13, 2026
  • Estimated starting rate$4,900 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $4,000–$6,000
  • Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit6 of 6 beds occupiedSeptember 20, 2024 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payMedi-Cal ALW acceptedDHCS participant list · August 9, 2026
  • Last state visitJune 3, 2026CDSS inspection record
  • Licence holderBe Well Senior Living II, Inc.Since 2013 · 2 licensed homes

Be Well Senior Living II is a small care home in Tarzana — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents since 2013. Dementia care is not on file.

Built from CDSS public records · September 13, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Be Well Senior Living II

Is Be Well Senior Living II licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

How many residents is Be Well Senior Living II licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Has Be Well Senior Living II been cited?

0 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2013, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. Those records count 7 state visits over the same years.

Is Be Well Senior Living II still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Be Well Senior Living II cost?

$4,900 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $4,000–$6,000. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 11 small homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 228 other homes of a similar licensed size across Los Angeles County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,000 to $6,300 a month, and the middle figure is $5,000 (n = 228 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out. What Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver covers in a care home.

Does Be Well Senior Living II take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home appears on the DHCS participation list, August 9, 2026. Confirm eligibility and current participation with the program. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Be Well Senior Living II, Inc., per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. See the homes licensed to Be Well Senior Living II, Inc. — at least 2 on the state roster.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Providence Cedars-Sinai Tarzana Medical Center is 1.2 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Be Well Senior Living II keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 4 residents, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Be Well Senior Living II license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “BE WELL SENIOR LIVING II INC.”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #197608381. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • Licensed to Be Well Senior Living II, Inc., per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2013, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 7 state inspection visits since 2013, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2013, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. The same records count 7 state visits in that period.
  • 2 complaints and 0 substantiated allegations on file since 2013, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is June 3, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 6 residents
  • Dementia / memory careNot on file · ask the home
  • Hospice careApproved · covers up to 4 residents
  • BedriddenApproved · covers up to 1 resident

State licensing record · September 13, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
6 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 1 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 4.

935 - ELDERLY

CDSS record, verbatim · September 13, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 4 — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 13, 2026

4 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation not on file

    Ask: “If memory loss develops, what would change — and when would a move be needed?”

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$4,900a month to start

Likely $4,000–$6,000

From 11 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$4,900a month

Likely $4,000–$6,200

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room

Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.

  • Starting monthly rate$4,900likely $4,000–$6,000

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 11 small homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $4,000–$6,200
$4,900
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,700–$9,300
$6,900
How people payOn the Medi-Cal waiver list · private pay, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home appears on the DHCS participation list, August 9, 2026. Confirm eligibility and current participation with the program. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board. For a resident on SSI/SSP, California’s 2026 standard sends $1,444.07 a month to the home for room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 11 small homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

11 homes like this within 5 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,750–$8,950.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 11 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 5711 Beckford Avenue, Tarzana, CA 91356Address from the public record · September 13, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2022, the state has filed 7 documents for this home, and its records count 7 visits since 2013. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated June 3, 2026.

On file since
2022
State visits
7
Most recent visit
June 3, 2026
Occupied · September 20, 2024 visit
6 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 2 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated September 20, 2024. 2 of the 2 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Unsubstantiated” (2). 2 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 2 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations0typical 0
  • Type B citations0typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations0typical 0
  • Total complaints2typical 0

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2013.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated2026110202511020243402022110

The last 36 months — 6 of 7 documents

20261 state visit · 1 document
Jun 3, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

At approximately 2:15 p.m. on 06/03/26, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nicholas Reed conducted an unannounced annual inspection. LPA met with staff and later the licensee and disclosed the reason for the visit. A file review was conducted prior to this visit. The facility was last visited on 03/12/25 for an annual inspection. It is a single story building with eight (08) bedrooms, two (02) bathrooms, kitchen, office, common areas, and outdoor areas. It has an approved fire clearance for six (06) nonambulatory residents, of which one (01) may be bedridden. The facility serves residents with dementia. Approved hospice waivers for four (04). At 2:25 p.m. LPA reviewed resident and personnel files. All files were complete, updated, and available for audit. The front entrance was gated and unlocked. The front yard was maintained. Once inside, LPA observed postings near the main entrance and the office area for Ombudsman contacts, confidential complaint contacts, facility license, COVID precautions, emergency disaster plan, facility sketch, personal rights, rights of resident councils, liability insurance, and emergency contacts. A screening station at the front contained a visitor log, gloves, masks, and sanitizer. Walls, floors, windows, screens, and blinds were clean and in good repair. At 3:20 p.m. LPA measured the room temperature to be 74 degrees Fahrenheit. The living room contained televisions, reading materials, board games, and exercise equipment. A fireplace was appropriately grated with the gas line turned off. Medications, first aid kit, and confidential files were locked near the dining room. The facility has eight (08) bedrooms. The bedroom nearest the main entrance is designated as a staff room. The staff room was free of hazards. Bedroom #7 was designated for storage and was free of hazards. All resident bedrooms contained a nightstand, storage, and a bed with adequate bedding. All beds with wheels were maintained in the locked position. All furnishings were clean and in good condition. Bedroom #3 had a sign posted stating “No Smoking – Oxygen In Use” The facility has 2 bathrooms. Both bathrooms contained liquid soap, paper towels, trash cans with a tight fitting lid, grab bars near the toilet and shower, and a non-skid mat in the shower. At 3:40 p.m. LPA measured the hot water temperature in Bathroom #1 at 107.4 degrees Fahrenheit. LPA observed a shaded patio area in the rear of the facility. The patio contained two (02) tables with furniture in good condition. The back yard was maintained with fruit trees and shrubs. Two (02) out of two (02) emergency exit paths were free from obstructions. A locked shed near the main entrance contained extra supplies. Two (02) out of two (02) auditory alarms were turned on and functioning. LPA observed an adequate supply of perishable and non-perishable foods in the kitchen. The stove hood was clean. Appliances were in good condition. Sharps were locked below the counter top. Cleaning solutions were locked in a laundry room adjacent to the kitchen. Also located in the laundry room were a washer and dryer. Both were in working order. At 3:50 p.m. LPA observed a fully charged fire extinguisher in the kitchen. It was last inspected on 01/28/26 with a tag attached. At approximately 4:00 p.m. the smoke detector in Bedroom #1 was tested and operational. At approximately 4:05 p.m. the carbon monoxide detector in the dining room was tested and operational. LPA called out from the house phone at 4:10 p.m. and was deemed to be operational. During today's inspection, the facility was in compliance with Title 22 regulations. No immediate health and safety risks were observed during this visit. Exit interview conducted. Copy of report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 3, 2026
20251 state visit · 1 document
Mar 12, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

At 9:15 a.m. on 03/12/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nicholas Reed conducted an unannounced annual inspection. LPA met with staff and later the licensee and co-administrator and disclosed the reason for the visit. A file review was conducted prior to this visit. The facility was last visited on 09/20/2024 for a complaint visit. It is a single story building with eight (08) bedrooms, two (02) bathrooms, kitchen, office, common areas, and outdoor areas. It has an approved fire clearance for six (06) nonambulatory residents, of which one (01) may be bedridden. The facility serves residents with dementia. Approved hospice waivers for four (04). At 9:25 a.m. LPA reviewed resident and personnel files. All files were complete and available for audit. The front entrance was gated and unlocked. The front yard was maintained. Once inside, LPA observed postings near the main entrance and the office area for Ombudsman contacts, confidential complaint contacts, facility license, COVID precautions, emergency disaster plan, facility sketch, personal rights, rights of resident councils, and emergency contacts. A screening station at the front contained a visitor log, gloves, masks, and sanitizer. Walls, floors, windows, screens, and blinds were clean and in good repair. At 10:30 a.m. LPA measured the room temperature to be 73 degrees Fahrenheit. The living rooms contained televisions, reading materials, board games, and exercise equipment. A fireplace was appropriately grated with the gas line turned off. Medications, first aid kit, and confidential files were locked near the dining room. Also observed was a sufficient supply of emergency water. The facility has eight (08) bedrooms. The bedroom nearest the main entrance is designated as a staff room. The staff room was locked and free of hazards. It also contained emergency food supplies, PPE, and incontinence supplies. Bedroom #5 was designated for storage and was free of hazards. All resident bedrooms contained a nightstand, storage, and a bed with adequate bedding. All beds with wheels were maintained in the locked position. All furnishings were clean and in good condition. Four (04) out of four (04) bedrooms with oxygen in use had appropriate signage posted on their doors. The facility has 2 bathrooms. Both bathrooms contained liquid soap, paper towels, trash cans with a tight fitting lid, grab bars near the toilet and shower, and a non-skid mat in the shower. At 10:45 a.m. LPA measured the hot water temperature in Bathroom #1 to be 105.4 degrees Fahrenheit. LPA observed a shaded patio area in the rear of the facility. The patio contained two (02) tables with furniture in good condition. The back yard was maintained with fruit trees and shrubs. Two (02) out of two (02) emergency exit paths were free from obstructions. A shed near the main entrance contained extra supplies. Two (02) out of two (02) auditory alarms were turned on and functioning. LPA observed an adequate supply of perishable and non-perishable foods in the kitchen. The stove hood was clean. Appliances were in good condition. Sharps were locked below the counter top. Cleaning solutions were locked in a laundry room adjacent to the kitchen. Also located in the laundry room were a washer and dryer. Both were in working order. At 10:55 a.m. LPA observed a fully charged fire extinguisher in the kitchen. It was last inspected on 02/21/2025. At approximately 11:00 a.m. the smoke detector in the hallway was tested and operational. At approximately 11:05 a.m. the carbon monoxide detector in the dining room was tested and operational. LPA, staff, and administrator reviewed resident medications at 11:15 a.m. All medications were maintained in the correct quantities with matching documentation. The house phone was called at 11:30 a.m. and deemed to be operational. During today's inspection, the facility was in compliance with Title 22 regulations. No immediate health and safety risks were observed during this visit. Exit interview conducted. Copy of report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 12, 2025
20243 state visits · 4 documents
Sep 20, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff are not providing records to responsible person

At 11:00 a.m. on 09/20/24, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nicholas Reed conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit. LPA met with staff and disclosed the reason for the visit. To investigate the allegation above, LPA conducted an initial visit on 07/18/24 and toured the facility at 10:30 a.m., interviewed staff, residents, and family between 11:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., and conducted a records review at 1:00 p.m. of documents pertinent to the investigation, including but not limited to hospice records, medical assessments, admission agreements, identification forms, and service plans. Regarding the allegation “Facility staff are not providing records to responsible person” it was alleged the facility did not provide the hospice records of Resident #1 (R1) to their responsible person when requested. Interview with Family Member #1 (F1) at 2:30 p.m. on 07/18/24 revealed that they believed they were R1’s responsible person. F1 requested their hospice records from the facility prior to R1 moving out and the licensee did not provide them. Unsubstantiated Record review of R1’s Identification and Emergency Contact form and R1’s admission agreement revealed R1’s responsible person to be Family Member #2 (F2). Interview with F2 at 4:15 p.m. on 07/18/24 revealed they had never requested R1’s records. Interview with the licensee at approximately 12:00 p.m. on 07/18/24 revealed F2 signed R1’s facility admission documents upon admission and was designated as R1’s responsible person. The licensee confirmed F1 requested R1’s hospice records. Since F1’s request was not specific, the licensee referred F1 to R1’s hospice agency for the records. Based on interviews and record review, the facility was able and willing to provide R1’s records to their responsible person, and they maintained R1’s records’ confidentiality. Therefore, the allegation is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. No immediate health and safety risks were observed during today’s inspection. Exit interview conducted. Copy of report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 20, 2024 · control 31-AS-20240718083724
Sep 20, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff neglect contributed to resident's death Facility staff do not ensure facility is maintained clean Facility staff do not properly address insects in the facility Facility staff do not meet residents' showering needs Facility staff do not meet residents' dietary needs Facility staff force the residents to eat

At 11:00 a.m. on 09/20/24, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nicholas Reed conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit. LPA met with Staff #1 (S1) and disclosed the reason for the visit. To investigate the allegations above, LPA conducted an initial visit on 07/18/24 and toured the facility at 10:30 a.m., interviewed staff, residents, and hospice staff between 11:00 a.m. and 2:30 p.m., and conducted a records review at 1:00 p.m. of documents pertinent to the investigation, including but not limited to hospice records, medical assessments, admission agreements, identification forms, and service plans. LPA obtained and reviewed pertinent hospital and hospice records at 1:00 p.m. on 08/30/24. Today, LPA interviewed S1 at 11:05 a.m. and Staff #2 (S2) at 11:15 a.m. Regarding the allegation “Staff neglect contributed to resident’s death” it was alleged Resident #1 (R1) died at the hospital from choking due to staff feeding them too quickly and forcefully. Interview with the licensee at Unsubstantiated approximately 12:00 p.m. on 07/18/24 revealed S1 was assisting R1 eat breakfast during the morning of 05/02/24 when R1 began choking. Interview with S1 revealed they stopped feeding R1 immediately after choking, administered first aid, and directed S2 to call 9-1-1. Record review revealed the facility submitted an incident report for the choking incident. The report noted R1 was eating soft food in an upright position. After R1 started choking, S2 called 9-1-1 and the licensee and other staff attended to R1. Record review of staff training records revealed all staff were sufficiently trained in assisting residents with feeding and residents with difficulty swallowing. Review of R1’s service plan from 03/05/24 noted they were able to feed themselves and staff were to assist with preparing and providing meals and drinks. R1’s medical assessment indicated they were diagnosed with Alzheimer’s dementia. Review of hospital records indicated that R1 experienced pneumonitis from choking on food and vomit on 05/02/24. R1 was discharged from the hospital back to the facility on 05/08/24 with hospice care. Review of R1’s hospice records indicated that R1 exhibited “dysphagia consistent with dementia” after the incident. A death report submitted by the facility and hospice records indicated that R1 passed away on 05/10/24 due to cardiopulmonary arrest along with end stage Alzheimer’s dementia. Based on record review and interviews, facility staff did not neglect R1. Therefore, the allegation is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. Regarding the allegation “Facility staff do not ensure facility is maintained clean” it was alleged placemats and bibs were unsanitary and never washed. During facility tour, LPA observed all interior surfaces to be sanitary. LPA observed residents eating lunch at approximately 11:30 a.m. on 07/18/24 with clean bibs and placemats. LPA also observed staff wiping placemats and the dining room table after lunch around 1:00 p.m. Interviews with the licensee, Staff #3 (S3) at 12:10 p.m. on 07/18/24 and Staff #4 (S4) at 12:35 p.m. on 07/18/24 revealed staff wash bibs in the laundry every day. Due to communication issues, LPA was only able to interview two (02) out of five (05) residents, Resident #2 (R2) at 11:00 a.m. on 07/18/24 and Resident #3 (R3) at 4:00 p.m. on 07/18/24. Both residents interviewed mentioned no issues with facility cleanliness. Based on observations and interviews, staff wash surfaces, placemats, and bibs every day ensuring the facility is clean. Therefore, the allegation is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. Regarding the allegation “Facility staff do not properly address insects in the facility” it was alleged the facility did not resolve an issue with ants. During facility tour, LPA observed no insects or trace of insects or vermin in the home. Interview with the licensee revealed a few ants were noticed in the past in the corners of the home but never on tables, in eating areas, or in resident rooms. Staff promptly used bug spray to kill the ants. S3 confirmed that they used bug spray to get rid of ants previously in the facility. Two (02) out of two (02) residents interviewed confirmed they had no issue with ants or pests in the facility. Based on observations and interviews, the facility was free of insects and vermin and properly addressed past issues with insects. Therefore, the allegation is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. Regarding the allegation “Facility staff do not meet residents' showering needs” it was alleged staff do not properly shower residents. Record review of staff training records revealed all staff had been trained on resident hygiene and bathing. Interviews with R2 and R3 revealed they receive enough assistance with showering from facility staff and an outside agency. Interviews with staff and the licensee revealed the facility revealed no hygiene issues were raised by residents, family, or visitors. Residents receive shower assistance twice a week and bed baths the other five (5) days. Based on record review and interviews, the facility meets residents’ showering needs. Therefore, the allegation is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. Regarding the allegation “Facility staff do not meet residents' dietary needs” it was alleged the facility did not provide sufficient amounts of food at night. Observations from facility tours today at 11:30 a.m. and at 10:30 a.m. on 07/18/24 revealed the facility had sufficient food supplies available in the refrigerator, freezer, and pantry. Interviews with residents revealed they are fed enough and have snacks available after dinner. Interview with staff and the licensee revealed residents eat food like sandwiches, fruit, nutritional shakes, and ice cream after dinner every night. No staff have heard of any issues with insufficient food at night. Based on observations and interviews, the facility meets residents’ dietary needs. Therefore, the allegation is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. Regarding the allegation “Facility staff force the residents to eat” it was alleged staff force feed residents too quickly. Record review of staff training records revealed all staff are trained to properly assist with resident feeding needs. Record review of resident service plans and medical assessments revealed four (04) out of five (05) residents did not require assistance eating. LPA observed staff monitoring residents during lunch on 07/18/24 and assisting Resident #4 (R4) with eating. LPA did not observe staff force feeding residents. Interviews with S3 and S4 revealed most residents can feed themselves, and staff provide assistance if requested or necessary. Interview with the licensee revealed all staff monitor and assist residents with meals. No immediate health and safety risks were observed during today’s inspection. Exit interview conducted. Copy of report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 20, 2024 · control 31-AS-20240717143523
Jul 18, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies

At 10:30 a.m. on 07/18/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nicholas Reed conducted an unannounced case management visit. LPA met with staff and later the licensee and disclosed the reason for the visit. Today's case management visit was conducted due to a deficiency discovered during the course of investigating complaints #31-AS-20240717143523 and 31-AS-20240718083724. During a physical plant tour at approximately 10:40 a.m. today, the toilet tank in the north bathroom was observed to be exposed and without a lid. LPA also observed this during the annual inspection on 03/22/2024 and provided a note of technical assistance. At approximately 11:15 a.m., the licensee stated that the part was ordered but never installed. Based on observations and interviews, the facility bathroom was in disrepair. A deficiency is cited on the corresponding LIC 809-D page. No immediate health and safety risks were observed during today’s visit. Exit interview conducted. Appeal rights discussed. Copy of report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 18, 2024

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87303(e)(6) · Plan of correction due date: Jul 29, 2024

87303 Maintenance and Operation (e) ...plumbing fixtures shall be maintained as follows: (6) Toilet, handwashing and bathing facilities shall be maintained in operating condition. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation and interview, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in one (01) bathroom toilet which poses a potential Health, Safety, or Personal Rights risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 18, 2024

Plan of correction: Licensee has agreed to install the toilet fixture by the POC due date and send a photograph of the repair.

Mar 22, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

At 8:30 a.m. on 03/22/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nicholas Reed conducted an unannounced annual inspection. LPA met with staff and later the licensee and co-administrator and disclosed the reason for the visit. The facility was last visited on 03/18/2022 for an annual visit. It is a single story building with seven (07) bedrooms, two (02) bathrooms, kitchen, office, common areas, and outdoor areas. It has an approved fire clearance for six (06) nonambulatory residents, of which one (01) may be bedridden. The facility serves residents with dementia. Approved hospice waivers for four (04). LPA and staff toured the facility inside and out at 8:40 a.m. The front entrance was gated and unlocked. The front yard was maintained. Once inside, LPA observed postings near the main entrance for Ombudsman contacts, confidential complaint contacts, facility license, COID precautions and procedures, emergency disaster plan, facility sketch, personal rights, rights of resident councils, and emergency contacts. A screening station at the front contained a visitor log, gloves, masks, and sanitizer. Walls, floors, windows, screens, and blinds were clean and in good repair. At 8:50 a.m. LPA measured the room temperature to be seventy (70) degrees Fahrenheit. Surveillance cameras were observed at the main entrance and a hallway. The living rooms contained televisions, reading material, activities, exercise equipment, and karaoke equipment. A fireplace was appropriately grated with the gas line turned off. Medications were locked near the dining room. The house phone was tested to be operational at 9:00 a.m. At 9:05 a.m., LPA tested the carbon monoxide detector above the dining room to be operational. Two (02) other carbon monoxide detectors were observed in the facility. LPA observed an adequate supply of perishable and non-perishable foods in the kitchen. The stove hood was clean. Appliances were in good condition. Sharps were locked below the counter top. At 9:10 a.m. the refrigerator and freezer temperatures were measured to be forty (40) and zero (00) degrees Fahrenheit, respectively. Cleaning solutions were locked in a laundry room adjacent to the kitchen. Also located in the laundry room were a washer and dryer. Both were in working order. At 9:15 a.m. LPA observed a fully charged fire extinguisher in the kitchen. It was last inspected on 04/15/2023. The facility has seven (07) bedrooms. 1 bedroom is designated as an office. The office was locked and free of hazards. Bedroom #5 was designated for storage and was free of hazards. All bedrooms contained a chair, lamp, nightstand, storage, and a bed with adequate bedding. All furnishings were clean and in good condition. Bedrooms with oxygen in use contained appropriate signage. The facility has 2 bathrooms. All bathrooms contained liquid soap, paper towels, handwashing instruction sign, trash cans with a tight fitting lid, grab bars near the toilet and shower, and a non-skid mat in the shower. LPA observed a shaded patio area in the rear of the facility. The patio contained furniture in good condition. The back yard was maintained with fruit trees and shrubs. Two (02) out of two (02) emergency exit paths were free from obstructions. Two (02) out of two (02) auditory alarms were turned on and functioning. At approximately 11:30 a.m. the smoke detector in the hallway was tested and operational. At approximately 11:45 a.m. LPA measured the water temperature to be 111.5 degrees Fahrenheit. LPA reviewed resident medications at 9:20 a.m., staff and resident files at 10:40 a.m., and conducted staff and resident interviews at 11:15 a.m. During today's inspection, the facility was in compliance with Title 22 regulations. No immediate health and safety risks were observed during this visit. Exit interview conducted. Copy of report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 22, 2024
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Who holds the licence

Be Well Senior Living II, Inc., licensed since 2013, operates 2 licensed homes in California. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in Los Angeles County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Los Angeles County