Auburn Valley Senior Living

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Cassandra Mikkelson arrived unannounced and met with staff Lisa Marie Fullerton and Aneisha Green to conduct an annual inspection utilizing the inspection tool. LPA spoke with Administrator Anamaria Docmanov via phone to inform of visit. LPA conducted an inspection of the care home to ensure compliance with Title 22 regulations. LPA observed resident rooms, common area bathrooms, kitchen, common areas, laundry room and perimeter of care home. LPA observed rooms to be properly furnished, with appropriate bedding and lighting. The bathrooms were in sanitary condition and properly maintained. LPA checked the kitchen area for the ability to prepare and store food. Care home has required (2) two day perishable and (7) seven day non-perishable food supply on hand. Smoke detectors and carbon monoxide detectors are operational in the care home. Fire extinguishers and first aid kit are maintained and ready for emergency use. LPA checked medication storage and found medications to be locked away and inaccessible to the residents. LPA reviewed four (4) resident files, two (2) staff files and resident medications. Facility has a current copy of certificate of liability insurance and LPA requested a copy. As a result of this visit, no deficiencies were cited pursuant to California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8. Exit interview was conducted.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 4, 2025

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 2/3/2025 LPA Tryon visited the home to do an annual visit. LPA met with Staff Magdalena Szanto LPA toured the facility including common areas, kitchen, food supplies, laundry, medication area, bedrooms, bathrooms, hallways. The facility is clean, in good condition and well-furnished. Food supplies are adequate to meet the requirement of 2 days perishable and 7 days non-perishable. The facility has a good supply of PPE, hand sanitizer, soaps, paper products ,etc. Appropriate postings, posters such as client's rights, reporting agencies, emergency plans, etc. are present. LPA reviewed 2 of 5 resident files and 2 files for staff. Files appear complete and accurate. LPA reviewed the CARE Tool with staff. LPA spoke with two staff during the visit. Residents were resting after lunch so LPA did not disturb them for interviews. LPA requested copy of current Liability policy. At this time, the facility appears to be in substantial compliance with the regulations. No deficiencies were cited at this visit. Exit interview conducted.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 3, 2025

Allegation investigated: Staff do not transfer resident. Staff do not provide adequate incontinent care. Staff do not observe resident regularly.

On 9/12/2024 LPA Tryon visited the facility to complete the complaint. LPA met with staff Jessica Campbell. LPA has toured the facility, reviewed resident files, spoken with staff and Licensee. LPA was not able to speak with resident involved, as the resident has moved and current address is unknown at this time. Regarding the allegation that staff do not transfer resident, in speaking with all staff interviewed, LPA learned that resident R1 was mostly independent and able to transfer self; sometimes needed assistance. R1 would call for staff and often 2 or 3 staff would respond to assist. R1 was taken to the table for meals, could use bathroom either independently or with assistance. LPA finds the allegation to be UNFOUNDED. Regarding allegation that staff do not provide adequate incontinent care, as noted above, LPA learned that R1 was pretty independent or could transfer with assist. It appears staff responded quickly when called. It was learned that R1 rarely had incontinence issues and used bathroom/commode, therefore not really requiring special care. However, it appears staff did respond quickly when needed. Allegation is unfounded. Regarding the allegation that staff do not observe resident regularly, LPA learned that staff gave a great deal of time and attention to R1, responded quickly when R1 called, and were aware of R1's needs and (continued) Unfounded condition. R1 was receiving hospice services, and was regularly seen by the hospice agency staff. It appears that R1 was observed on a regular basis. Allegation is unfounded. A finding of unfounded means that the allegation is false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. No deficiencies were cited as a result of this complaint. Exit interview conducted.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 12, 2024 · control 59-AS-20240708144038

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 1/5/2023 LPA Tryon visited the home to do an annual visit. LPA met with Licensee Anamaria Docmonov. LPA toured the facility including common areas, kitchen, food supplies, laundry, medication area, bedrooms, bathrooms, hallways. The facility is clean, in good condition and well-furnished. Food supplies are adequate to meet the requirement of 2 days perishable and 7 days non-perishable. The facility has a good supply of PPE, hand sanitizer, soaps, paper products ,etc. Appropriate postings, posters such as client's rights, reporting agencies, emergency plans, etc. are present. LPA reviewed 2 of 6 resident files and files for all staff. Files appear complete and accurate. LPA reviewed the CARE Tool with licensee. At this time, the facility appears to be in substantial compliance with the regulations. No deficiencies were cited at this visit. Exit interview conducted.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 5, 2024