Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

All Star Care

Small home·Licensed for 6·Palmdale, California

Licensed since 2023Licence #197610419
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · September 13, 2026
  • Starting rate$4,525 a monthListed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026
  • Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit5 of 6 beds occupiedJanuary 21, 2026 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitMay 19, 2026CDSS inspection record

All Star Care is a small care home in Palmdale — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents since 2023. Dementia care is not on file.

Built from CDSS public records · September 13, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about All Star Care

Is All Star Care licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

How many residents is All Star Care licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Has All Star Care been cited?

2 Type A and 2 Type B citations since 2023, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. Those records count 14 state visits over the same years.

Is All Star Care still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does All Star Care cost?

$4,525 a month to start — listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026.

The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly, seen September 9, 2026.

Among 227 other homes of a similar licensed size across Los Angeles County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,000 to $6,350 a month, and the middle figure is $5,000 (n = 227 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does All Star Care take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by All Star Care Inc., per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Can All Star Care keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 6 residents, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

All Star Care license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “ALL STAR CARE INC”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #197610419. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • Licensed to All Star Care Inc., per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2023, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 14 state inspection visits since 2023, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 2 Type A and 2 Type B citations on file since 2023, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. The same records count 14 state visits in that period.
  • 3 complaints and 4 substantiated allegations on file since 2023, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is May 19, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 6 residents
  • Dementia / memory careNot on file · ask the home
  • Hospice careApproved · covers up to 6 residents
  • BedriddenApproved · covers up to 1 resident

State licensing record · September 13, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR SIX (6) NON-AMBULATORY, ONE OF WHICH MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. BEDRIDDEN IN ROOM 5. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR SIX

985 - RCFE / HOSPICE

CDSS record, verbatim · September 13, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 6 — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 13, 2026

4 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation not on file

    Ask: “If memory loss develops, what would change — and when would a move be needed?”

Care & day-to-day support

These are the home’s own statements about its day-to-day practice — they are not part of the state licensing record, and the state has not approved or reviewed them.

  • Help with bathing or showering

    Reported on seniorly.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Assistance with transfers

    Reported on seniorly.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Medication management

    Reported on seniorly.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Therapies availablePhysical therapy

    Reported on seniorly.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Diabetic / carbohydrate-controlled diet

    Reported on seniorly.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Help with dressing and grooming

    Reported on seniorly.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Building is wheelchair accessible

    Reported on seniorly.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Works with residents’ own health care providers

    Reported on seniorly.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Diabetes care

    Reported on seniorly.com · seen September 9, 2026.

Nights & staffing

  • 24-hour supervision claimed

    Reported on seniorly.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Emergency call system

    Reported on seniorly.com · seen September 9, 2026.

What it costs here

This home’s starting rate

$4,525a month to start

Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026 · See listing

Likely monthly total

$4,525a month

Likely $4,525–$5,125

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · where the price comes from
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room

Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.

  • Starting monthly rate$4,525this home

    The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly, seen September 9, 2026.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $4,525–$5,125
$4,525
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,525–$8,650
$6,525

Costs & moving in

  • Same-day assessments

    Reported on seniorly.com · seen September 9, 2026.

How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWhere this price comes from

The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly, seen September 9, 2026.

11 homes like this within 25 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,500–$5,000.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 11 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 36240 52 St East, Palmdale, CA 93552Address from the public record · September 13, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2023, the state has filed 12 documents for this home, and its records count 14 visits since 2023. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated May 19, 2026.

On file since
2023
State visits
14
Most recent visit
May 19, 2026
Occupied · January 21, 2026 visit
5 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 4 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated February 12, 2024 to January 21, 2026. 4 of the 4 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (2), “Unsubstantiated” (2). 4 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 4 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations2typical 0
  • Type B citations2typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations4typical 0
  • Total complaints3typical 0

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2023.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated2026220202533020244522023220

The last 36 months — 10 of 12 documents

20262 state visits · 2 documents
May 19, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 5/19/2026 at approximately 09:30 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Angelica Segovia conducted an unannounced annual visit to the facility. LPA was greeted by the staff and stated the reason for their visit. The Administrator, Iveta Darabedyan arrived shortly after to assist with today’s visit. LPA asked for the census, Staff/Resident Roster, and Liability Insurance. LPA conducted a physical plant tour at approximately 11:00 AM and the following was noted: The facility is a single-story building with five (5) bedrooms and three (3) bathrooms. The facility is currently occupying four (4) residents. There is a designated staff room and staff bathroom. The facility has an approved fire clearance for six (6) non-ambulatory residents of which one (1) may be bedridden. Hospice waiver approved for six (6). Common areas: The living room and dining room were observed to be neat, clean, and organized. The rooms were observed to be properly furnished and in good repair. The facility maintains a comfortable temperature at 73°F. LPA observed a fire extinguisher to be located near the kitchen and purchase receipt of 01/17/2026. LPA observed required postings such as Long-Term Care Ombudsman, Emergency Disaster Plan, and Personal Rights to be located alongside the common areas. A working telephone was observed. LPA observed the fireplace to be covered and inaccessible to residents. Auditory alarms were observed throughout all entrances/exits of the facility. (continued on LIC 809-C) Kitchen: The kitchen was observed to be clean and free from pests. Sufficient supplies of seven (7) day nonperishable foods and two (2) day perishable foods were observed. Knives/sharps were observed to be kept in a locked kitchen drawer. The cleaning solutions/toxins were observed to be kept locked underneath the kitchen sink. Kitchen appliances were observed to be working and in proper condition. Bedrooms: The residents’ rooms are adequately furnished with appropriate furniture and lighting system. Hallways/passageways are lighted appropriately. Extra linens/covers were observed to be stored in cabinets located within the hallway’s passageway. Bathrooms: The bathrooms were checked for cleanliness and proper operation. The hot water temperature was measured within regulations. LPA observed appropriate grab rails and slip-resistant mats to be in proper condition. Staff Room: LPA observed the staff room to be locked and inaccessible to residents. Backyard: The backyard of the facility is equipped with a designated shaded area with outdoor furniture for residents. LPA observed there to be a locked shed/bathroom. There is no body of water located at the facility. Laundry Room: The laundry room was observed to be kept locked and located near the garage. LPA observed cleaning solutions and toxins stored appropriately within the laundry room and inaccessible to residents. The laundry appliances were observed to be working and in proper condition. Garage: The garage can be accessed from inside of the facility and located near the laundry room. The garage was observed to be kept locked and used for storage purposes. Medications: The medications were observed to be kept locked and located within a kitchen island cabinet. First-aid kit observed and First-Aid Manuel. Smoke detectors and carbon monoxide observed to be working properly and were tested. Residents/Staff Records: LPA conducted a complete file review of resident records. Resident records appeared to be complete and updated. Staff records: LPA conducted a complete file review of three (3) staff records. Staff records appeared to be complete and updated. There were no immediate health and safety hazards observed during the day of inspection. Exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was provided to the Administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 19, 2026
Jan 21, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are in violation of residents’ personal rights. Uncleared adults are supervising residents. Licensee does not ensure the Egress alarms are properly working.

On 1/21/2026 at approximately 9:15 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Angelica Segovia conducted an unannounced initial complaint visit to the facility. LPA was greeted by staff and stated the reason for their visit. The Administrator, Iveta Darabedyan arrived shortly after to assist with today’s visit. To investigate the allegation(s), at approximately 09:30 AM, LPA conducted a physical plant tour. By 10:00 AM, LPA requested relevant documentation. From 10:30 AM to 01:00 PM, LPA attempted interviews with five (5) residents (R1-R5), two (2) staff members (S1-S2) and conducted record review. (contiue to LIC 9099-C) Unsubstantiated Regarding the allegation: Staff are in violation of residents’ personal rights. It was alleged that staff have violated residents’ personal rights. To investigate the allegation, LPA attempted interviews with five (5) residents and two (2) staff members. LPA’s interview with three (3) of the five (5) residents denied staff locking them in their room/bed, leaving them unattended and taking away their personal belongings. LPA attempted to interview R4 and R5 but due to their inability to validate the questions being asked, LPA terminated the interview. LPA’s interview with both staff members revealed that a former staff member, who has been terminated but refuses to leave the premises, has caused issues among staff and residents. LPA’s interview with S1 revealed they are in the process with the courts to take care of the matter and have ensured that the residents will not be left alone with said ex-employee. During LPA’s physical plant tour, LPA observed S2 to be present and assisting the residents. LPA did not observe the residents to be left alone or unattended. Based on interviews and observations, there is not enough information to verify the allegation. Therefore, the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. Regarding the allegation: Uncleared adults are supervising residents. It was alleged that staff members were working without obtaining proper background clearance. To investigate the allegation, LPA conducted interviews with three (3) residents and two (2) staff members. LPA’s interview with all three (3) residents revealed there are two (2) main caregivers (S2 and S3). LPA’s interview with S1 revealed that a former staff member, who was mentioned by the Reporting Party (RP), is no longer employed by the facility. LPA’s interview with all three (3) residents and two (2) staff members declined that an additional staff member, mentioned by the RP, has not worked at the facility. LPA conducted record review of the following documentation: Personnel Report, Department of Social Services Guardian Background Check System and Licensing Information System (LIS). LPA’s record review confirmed that the six (6) staff members listed on all documents had background clearance and were associated to the facility, including S1, S2 and S3. Based on interviews, observations and record review, there is not enough information to verify the allegation. Therefore, the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. (continue to LIC 9099-C) Regarding the allegation: Licensee does not ensure the Egress alarms are properly working. It was alleged that the facility’s auditory alarms were not working. To investigate the allegation, LPA conducted a physical plant tour. LPA observed a total of two (2) auditory alarms. One located in the front entrance/exit and the other located on the sliding door exit leading towards the backyard. LPA observed both to be functional and in proper condition. LPA observed both auditory alarms to signal when the doors would open. LPA attempted to observe room 5, which has an exit door per the facility sketch, but LPA observed room 5 to be locked. Per S1, room 5 is being occupied by the ex-employee who will not leave the facility. Based on interviews and observations, there is not enough information to verify the allegation. Therefore, the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. No immediate health and safety issues observed during the day of the visit. Exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was provided to the Administrator. Regarding the allegation: Staff do not follow proper medication management protocol. It was alleged that staff were administering medication to residents without a physician’s order. To investigate the allegation, LPA conducted interviews with three (3) residents and two (2) staff members. LPA’s interview with all three (3) residents revealed that staff have not given them unprescribed medication nor have they witnessed that to be done so. LPA’s interview with both staff members confirmed that all resident’s medications are centrally stored, locked and given as prescribed. However, during LPA’s physical plant, LPA observed R2’s medication to be accessible within the fridge and not locked. LPA observed medications to be stored in multiple areas of the refrigerator. LPA observed R2’s medication to be stored within a zip lock bag located where the perishable foods are kept. Additionally, LPA observed an unprescribed medication to be within a glass bottle wrapped in aluminon foil stored on the second shelf behind the food containers. In addition, LPA observed an unprescribed medication bottle to be located on the door of the refrigerator. LPA’s interview with S1 revealed that R2’s medication is to be locked in a container within the fridge and was unsure how their medication ended up outside of said container. Based on observation and interviews, LPA observed R2’s medication not locked and accessible to residents in care as well as unprescribed medication, therefore the allegation is SUBSTANTIATED, at this time. Citation issued, Please refer to 9099-D. No other immediate health and safety issues observed during the day of the visit. Exit interview was conducted, appeal rights and a copy of this report was provided to the Administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 21, 2026 · control 31-AS-20260114144418

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87465(h)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Jan 22, 2026

87465 Incidental Medical and Dental Care. (h) The following requirements shall apply to medications which are centrally stored:...(2) Centrally stored medicines shall be kept in a safe and locked place that is not accessible to persons... This requirement was not met by: Based on interviews and observation, medications were not locked and were left accessible within the refrigerator which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 21, 2026

Plan of correction: The Administer will review the regulation and email LPA Segovia a statement of understanding along with photos of residents’ medication locked and inaccessible to persons in care.

20253 state visits · 3 documents
Jun 27, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility is in financial distress

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Melissa Spaeth conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint investigation for the allegation(s) listed above. LPA was greeted by the two caregivers. LPA spoke to the Administrator, Iveta Darabedyan by phone at 10:45 am. LPA Spaeth stated the purpose of the visit was to present the complaint findings. LPA and the caregiver toured the facility at 10:50 am until 11:00 am. LPA observed there are four residents living in the facility. The investigation consisted of the following: On 6/06/2024, LPA Spaeth conducted a 10-day visit and observed there were no residents in the facility. Continued on 9099-C Unsubstantiated Regarding the allegation: Facility is in financial distress: It’s being alleged the facility is financially struggling. LPA Spaeth interviewed the Administrator today at 10:45 am who stated there are four residents living in the facility and all rent payments have been received. LPA reviewed the resident’s records and observed Admissions Agreements state the monthly payment amounts. During LPA’s facility tour, LPA observed a sufficient supply of food and other supplies necessary to ensure the care of the residents. Based upon LPA’s interview, review of residents’ records, and observations, the allegation is unsubstantiated. Exit interview conducted and a copy of the report was giventhe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 27, 2025 · control 31-AS-20240602100413
May 2, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Melissa Spaeth conducted an unannounced case management visit and was greeted by two caregivers. LPA spoke to the Administrator, Iveta Darabedyan by phone. LPA stated the purpose of the visit was to review residents' files and tour the facility. LPA reviewed the residents' files at 10:45 am until 11:10 am. LPA toured the facility at 11:10 am until 11:50 am. At 11:20 am, LPA observed the front door and back door delayed egress devices were not working. Also, the delayed egress device in Room 3 was weak and could not be heard. Pursuant to Title 22 Division 6 of the CA Code of Regulations, the following deficiencies were cited (refer to LIC 809-D). Exit interview conducted, Appeal Rights discussed, and a copy of the signed report was given to caregiverthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 2, 2025

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 88705(k) · Plan of correction due date: May 2, 2025

88705 Care of persons with Dementia (k) The following initial & continuing requirements must be met...to utilize delayed egress devices on exterior doors or perimeter fence gates. This is evidenced by: Based on LPA's observations, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above. LPA observed the delayed egress alarms had been turned off at the front door and back door. The alarm in Room 3 had a weak alarm notification, which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 2, 2025

Plan of correction: During LPA's visit, the front door and back door egress devices were turned on. The device in Room 3 was repaired and was properly working.

Mar 13, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 3/13/2025 at approximately 09:30 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Angelica Segovia conducted an unannounced annual visit to the facility. LPA was greeted by the caregiver and LPA stated the reason for their visit. Administrator Iveta Darabedyan arrived shortly after to assist with today’s visit. LPA asked for the census and Staff/Resident Roster. LPA conducted a physical plant tour at approximately 11:30 AM and the following was noted: The facility is a single unit building with five (5) bedrooms and three (3) bathrooms currently occupying three (3) residents. There is one (1) designated staff room with one (1) private bathroom. The facility has an approved fire clearance for six (6) non-ambulatory residents, one (1) of which may be bedridden. The facility has an approved Hospice waiver for six (6) residents. Sign in sheet, hand sanitizer, gloves and masks are available. LPA observed required posting such as See/Say Something, Long-Term Ombudsman, and Facility Sketch located immediately upon entrance. Common areas: These include the living room, the dining room, and Staff Office. All rooms were observed to be neat, clean, and organized. The rooms were observed to be properly furnished and in good repair. The facility maintains a comfortable temperature at 71°F. A fireplace was observed to be covered and inaccessible to residents. A working telephone was observed. Kitchen: The kitchen was observed to be clean and free from pests. Sufficient supplies of seven (7) day nonperishable foods and two (2) day perishable foods were observed. Knives and sharps were observed to be kept in a locked cabinet near the kitchen stove. LPA observed cleaning solutions and toxins to be kept locked underneath kitchen sink inaccessible to residents. Kitchen appliances were observed to be working and in proper condition. LPA observed a fire extinguisher to be located near the kitchen and dated 03/13/25. (continued on LIC 809-C) Bedrooms: The residents’ rooms are adequately furnished with appropriate furniture and lighting system. Hallways/passageways are lighted appropriately. Extra linens/covers were observed stored in a storage closet located in the hallway’s passageway. Bathrooms: The bathrooms were checked for cleanliness and proper operation. Appropriate grab rails and non-slip mats were observed and in proper condition. The hot water temperature was measured within regulations. Garage: The garage can be accessed from inside of the facility and was observed to be kept locked and inaccessible to residents. Laundry Room: The laundry room is located near the garage. LPA observed laundry room to be kept locked and cleaning solutions properly stored within laundry room and inaccessible to residents. Laundry appliances observed to be working and in proper condition. Staff Room: LPA observed staff room locked and inaccessible to residents. Backyard: The backyard of the facility is equipped with a designated shaded area with outdoor furniture for residents. There is no body of water located at the facility. Medications: Medications were observed to be kept in a locked cabinet located in the kitchen. First-aid kit observed to be equipped with but not limited to bandages, scissors, digital thermometer, tweezer, and First Aid manual. The Smoke detectors and carbon monoxides were observed to be working properly and were tested. Residents/Staff Records: LPA conducted a complete file review of resident records. Resident records appeared to be complete and updated. Staff records: LPA conducted a complete file review of staff records. Staff records appeared to be complete and updated. There were no immediate health and safety hazard observed during the day of inspection. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report was provided to the Administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 13, 2025
20244 state visits · 5 documents
Jun 11, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Office

An Informal Conference was conducted today in the Woodland Hills Adult and Senior Care Regional office. The purpose of this Informal Conference is to discuss the incident that occurred during the month of April, 2024. Present at today's meeting are the following: · Troy Agard, Licensing Program Manager (LPM) · Melissa Spaeth, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) · Iveta Darabedyan – Administrator/Licensee The informal conference process was explained to the Licensee. The Licensee was also informed that this Informal Conference is a part of the administrative action process. Further citations may result in a Non-Compliance Conference, which could lead to a referral to the Department's Legal Division for possible license revocation or other administrative actions. BRIEF HISTORY: Facility has been in operation since licensure on 5/15/2023 and is licensed for six non-ambulatory residents, one of which may be bedridden. A complaint was received by CCL on 6/02/2024. Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Melissa Spaeth initiated a complaint investigation on 6/06/2024, arrived at the facility at 9:45 am and stated the purpose of the visit was to investigate a complaint. Continued on 809-C LPA Spaeth and the Licensee toured the facility at 10:00 am to 10:15 am. LPA observed there were no residents living in the facility. The Licensee stated there were four residents living in the facility. However, the residents moved out during the month of April, 2024. LPA Spaeth requested to review the residents’ documents. The Administrator stated they did not obtain all the required documentation when the residents moved into the facility. The Administrator stated a verbal eviction notice was given to all four residents but not a written notification. LPM Agard discussed and expressed concerns regarding the April, 2024 incident. LPM Agard also expressed concerns that the Administrator failed to obtain the required resident documentation and failed to give the residents a written eviction notice. The Licensee was informed that Community Care Licensing (CCL) shall continue to frequently monitor the facility as often as necessary to ensure the Licensee's compliance with Title 22 Regulations Exit interview conducted, and a copy of the report was given.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 11, 2024
Jun 6, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Residents were illegally evicted Staff did not report facility status to the department

On 06/06/2024 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Melissa Spaeth initiated a complaint investigation for the allegation(s) listed above and met with the Administrator Iveta Darabedyan. LPA Spaeth explained the purpose of this visit is to gather information regarding the complaint allegations. The Administrator confirmed there are currently no residents within the facility. LPA Spaeth toured the facility at 10:00 am until 10:15 am and did not observe residents living in the facility, LPA Spaeth requested to review the following documents: 1) residents' documentation, and 2) residents' eviction notices. The Administrator stated they did not obtain all the required documentation when the residents moved into the facility. LPA interviewed the Administrator at 10:20 am until 11:30 am. Continued on 9099-C Substantiated The investigation revealed the following: Regarding the allegation, residents were illegally evicted. It’s being alleged residents were not given a written 30-day eviction notice. The Administrator stated a verbal notice was given to all four residents but not a written notification. Regarding the allegation, Staff did not report facility status to the department. It’s being alleged that the four residents (R1, R2, R3, and R4) were transferred to another licensed facility and the Administrator did not inform Community Care Licensing about the transfer. The Administrator stated R1, R2, and R3 were transferred to a licensed facility on 4/30/2024 because the residents were not happy. On 4/29/2024, R4 informed the Administrator they did not feel well and R4 was transferred to a local hospital. LPA Spaeth spoke to R4’s family member via phone call at 11:45 am who confirmed R4 was transferred to a local hospital. LPA asked if the Administrator had reported the transfer of residents to another facility to Community Care Licensing. The Administrator stated no. Based upon the Administrator’s interview, the above allegations, residents were illegally evicted and staff did not report facility status to the department are substantiated. Exit interview conducted, appeal rights discussed, and a copy of the report was given.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 6, 2024 · control 31-AS-20240602100413

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87224(a) · Plan of correction due date: Jun 7, 2024

Eviction Notification (a) The licensee may evict a resident for one or more of the reasons listed in Section 87224(a)(1) through (5). Thirty (30) days written notice to the resident is required....This is evidenced by: Based upon LPA's interview of the Licensee, the licensee failed to issue a written thirty day written notice to the residents. This poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 6, 2024

Plan of correction: The Administrator will review regulation 87224 and send an email to LPA Spaeth confirming the Administrator did review the regulation

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87211(a)(1)(D) · Plan of correction due date: Jun 7, 2024

87211 Reporting Requirements (a) Each licensee shall furnish to the licensing agency such reports as the Department may require…(1)A written report shall be submitted to the licensing agency…(D) Any incident which threatens the welfare, safety, or health of any resident…This is evidenced by: Based upon LPA's interview of the LIcensee, the licensee failed to report to the Department that R1, R2, and R3 moved to another licensed facility and R4 was transported to the hospitalthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 6, 2024

Plan of correction: The Administrator will review regulation 87211 and send an email to LPA Spaeth confirming the Administrator did review the regulation

The state marks this report as 5 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 4. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

Jun 6, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies

On 06/06/2024 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Melissa Spaeth initiated a complaint investigation for Complaint #31-AS-20240602100413. LPA Spaeth requested to review the resident's files. However, the Administrator stated they were unable to obtain the required documentation from the residents. LPA stated to the Administrator it is important to obtain all documentation before the move-in date. The Administrator stated they will make sure all documentation is obtained when admitting any resident. Based upon LPA's observation and interview of the Administrator, the following deficiency will be issued. Exit interview conducted, appeal rights discussed, and a copy of the report was given.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 6, 2024

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87506(a) · Plan of correction due date: Jun 7, 2024

87506 Resident Records (a) The licensee shall ensure that a separate, complete, and current record is maintained for each resident in the facility...This is evidenced by: The Licensee failed to obtain resident records for each resident living in the facility. This poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 6, 2024

Plan of correction: The Administrator will review regulation 87506 and send an email to LPA Spaeth confirming the Administrator did review the regulation.

May 25, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Gary Tan conducted an unannounced One (1) year Required visit at this facility. LPA met with the administrator Iveta Darabedyan and explained the purpose of this visit. A tour of the physical plant was conducted at 9:26 AM and the following was observed: The facility has one main entrance being used. The PPE screening station is located immediately upon entrance and had a table equipped with sufficient PPE readily accessible, a thermometer, hand sanitizer, gloves, mask and sign in sheet at the time of visit. The facility has an approved mitigation and infection control plan on file. The facility is a single storey building and has five (5) bedrooms and three (3) bathrooms. An additional room is being used as an office and one (1) bathroom is designated for staff use. The facility is fire cleared for six (6) non-ambulatory residents, one (1) of which maybe bedridden on Room #5. Hospice waiver for six (6) residents. Living and dining room furniture were checked. The living room is neat and clean along with the dining room. Furniture were observed to be in good repair and excellent condition. The facility maintains a comfortable temperature at 73°F. The dual smoke/carbon monoxide alarm are hardwired and interconnected and observed to be operational. There is a Fire extinguisher is located in the kitchen and observed to be full and current. The Clients' rooms are adequately furnished with appropriate furniture and lighting system. Hall ways/passage ways are lit. Clients have sufficient amounts of personal hygiene product which is provided by the licensee. (continued on LIC 809-C) (continued from LIC 809) Food Service/Kitchen area was sufficiently stocked with two (2) days perishable and seven (7) days non-perishable food. Frozen foods are properly wrapped and stored appropriately. Food storage and preparation areas are clean and inaccessible to pests. Knives and sharps are observed to be locked in the kitchen drawer and inaccessible to residents. Laundry area is located in bedroom hallway. Laundry detergent, cleaning solutions and other toxins are observed to be locked inside the laundry room. The Bathroom was checked for cleanliness and proper operation. LPA observed the appropriate grab bars in the toilet and shower. The hot water temperature was checked and measured at a range of 106.3°F to 111.1°F. Towels and washcloths are not shared. There were enough clean linen available in stock at the cabinet. Medications: LPA observed that the medication are kept in the cabinet in the island cabinet in the kitchen and was observed to be locked and inaccessible to residents. There was a complete first aid kit located on top of the medication cabinet. Garage: The garage has access from inside the facility and also being used as PPE, tools and other supplies storage. The garage was observed to be locked. The Backyard had a covered shaded area for clients with outdoor furniture. There is no body of water at the facility. Client records. There is no resident at the facility at this time. Staff records were also reviewed. Staff records was reviewed, staff have criminal record clearances and associated to this facility. Current training and first aid observed for staff on duty. Administrator's certificate was observed to be current. Required posting observed in facility (complaint hot line poster, personal rights, etc). Exit interview conducted. Copy of this report issuedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 25, 2024
Feb 12, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff withheld food from residents in care

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tuesday Cabiness conducted an initial complaint investigation and met with Administrator Iveta Darabeyan, who was informed the reason of the visit. The following was determined during the visit. It was alleged staff withheld food from residents in care. To investigate this matter, from 10:15am to 2pm, LPA conducted interviews with residents and staff and conducted a physical plant inspection of the kitchen area and the facility’s food. LPA observed the facility met Licensing requirements for perishable and non-perishable; but interviews reported the facility does not provide an adequate amount of food for meals. During today’s visit, LPA observed residents eating (1) hamburger for lunch. LPA also observed staff giving residents a piece of candy, 3 cookies, and a piece of banana. The quantity or variety was insufficient, and residents reported not getting enough food. LPA also observed the facility had locks on cabinets where food was kept. This is an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care. Therefore, based on observations and interviews the allegation is Substantiated Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 12, 2024 · control 31-AS-20240202164342

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87555(a) · Plan of correction due date: Feb 13, 2024

General Food Service Requirements: (a) The total daily diet shall be of the quality and in the quantity necessary to meet the needs of the residents and shall meet the Recommended Dietary Allowances of the Food and Nutrition Board...This requirement was not met, evidenced by: Based on observations and interviews, the facility does not provide an adequate amount of food for meals. This is a immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 12, 2024

Plan of correction: The Administrator will train and meet with staff on providing enough meals for the residents; as well as discussing appropriate snacks. Administrator will email LPA when training and discussion with staff take place.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

Find a detail about life at this home.

Rooms & the spaces they will use

  • Private rooms

    Reported on seniorly.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Outdoor spaceGarden · Walking paths

    Reported on seniorly.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Shared / companion rooms

    Reported on seniorly.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Common areasDining room · Game room

    Reported on seniorly.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Rooms come furnished

    Reported on seniorly.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • LaundryDone by staff

    Reported on seniorly.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Wifi in resident rooms

    Reported on seniorly.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Visitor parking

    Reported on seniorly.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Air conditioning in the room

    Reported on seniorly.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • AmenitiesConcierge · Move-in coordination

    Reported on seniorly.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Telephone in the room

    Reported on seniorly.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Housekeeping

    Reported on seniorly.com · seen September 9, 2026.

Meals, preferences & familiar food

  • Dining styleRestaurant style

    Reported on seniorly.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Food allergy management

    Reported on seniorly.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • All-day or flexible dining

    Reported on seniorly.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Meal timesScheduled meals

    Reported on seniorly.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Meals provided

    Reported on seniorly.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Organic food

    Reported on seniorly.com · seen September 9, 2026.

Activities & the rhythm of a day

  • Activity types offeredMovie nights

    Reported on seniorly.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Resident-run activities

    Reported on seniorly.com · seen September 9, 2026.

Faith, culture & language

  • Languages spoken by caregiversEnglish

    Reported on seniorly.com · seen September 9, 2026.

Visiting & staying involved

  • Transportation

    Reported on seniorly.com · seen September 9, 2026.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in Los Angeles County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Los Angeles County