Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

All for Seniors

Small home·Licensed for 6·San Diego, California

Licensed since 2000Licence #374600916
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Dementia · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · September 27, 2026
  • Estimated starting rate$4,200 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $3,450–$5,200
  • Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit5 of 6 beds occupiedFebruary 8, 2024 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitApril 21, 2026CDSS inspection record

All for Seniors is a small care home in San Diego — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents since 2000.

Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about All for Seniors

Is All for Seniors licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

How many residents is All for Seniors licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Has All for Seniors been cited?

0 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2000, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 7 state visits over the same years.

Is All for Seniors still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does All for Seniors cost?

$4,200 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,450–$5,200. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 9 small homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 49 other homes of a similar licensed size in San Diego that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,950 to $6,000 a month, and the middle figure is $5,000 (n = 49 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does All for Seniors take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Abitria, M.Donna U., per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Scripps Memorial Hospital - La Jolla is 4.4 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can All for Seniors keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

All for Seniors license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “ALL FOR SENIORS”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #374600916. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed to Abitria, M.Donna U., per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2000, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 7 state inspection visits since 2000, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2000, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 7 state visits in that period.
  • 2 complaints and 0 substantiated allegations on file since 2000, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is April 21, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 6 residents
  • Dementia / memory careApproved by the state
  • Hospice careApproved by the state
  • BedriddenApproved · covers up to 1 resident

State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
FACILITY SERVES SIX (6) NON-AMBULATORY ELDERLY RESIDENTS; AGES 60 AND ABOVE. HOSPICE WAIVER APPROVED FOR ONE (1) RESIDENT. BEDROOMS #1 AND #3 APPROVED FOR BEDRIDDEN; ONLY ONE (1) BEDRIDDEN RESIDENT AT A TIME. BEDROOM #5 APPROVED FOR AMBULATORY ONLY.

983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA

CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation on file

    Ask: “Can we read the dementia care disclosure and discuss how daily support works?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

3 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$4,200a month to start

Likely $3,450–$5,200

From 9 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$4,200a month

Likely $3,450–$5,400

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room
  • Starting monthly rate$4,200likely $3,450–$5,200

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 9 small homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $3,450–$5,400
$4,200
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,050–$8,550
$6,200
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 9 small homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

9 homes like this within 5 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,500–$5,150.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 9 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 10251 Trails End Circle, San Diego, CA 92126Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2022, the state has filed 7 documents for this home, and its records count 7 visits since 2000. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated April 21, 2026.

On file since
2022
State visits
7
Most recent visit
April 21, 2026
Occupied · February 8, 2024 visit
5 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 2 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated July 14, 2022 to February 8, 2024. 2 of the 2 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Unsubstantiated” (2). 2 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 2 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations0typical 0
  • Type B citations0typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations0typical 0
  • Total complaints2typical 0

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2000.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated2026220202511020242202022220

The last 36 months — 5 of 7 documents

20262 state visits · 2 documents
Apr 21, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: POC

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Natasha Persaud conducted a Plan of Correction visit. LPA was greeted and allowed entry into the facility and conducted the visit with Administrator, Consuelo Banting. On 03/18/26, the licensee was issued a deficiency for not having annual training regarding the emergency disaster plan. The licensee has completed and documented the required training. As of today, the deficiency has been corrected and cleared. No deficiencies were issued today. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator, Consuelo Banting to whom a copy of this report and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided during the visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 21, 2026
Mar 18, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Natasha Persaud conducted an unannounced Required Annual Inspection. The facility file was reviewed prior to the visit. LPA was greeted and allowed entry into the facility and conducted the visit with Administrator, Consuelo Banting. LPA, accompanied by staff, toured the interior and exterior of the facility, and inspected each room. The facility was clean, sanitary, and in good repair. Pathways were free of obstruction and slip hazards. Resident bedrooms contained the required furnishings. Doors, windows and screens, toilets, and showers were in working order. Extra linens and hygiene supplies were present, as well as Personal Protective Equipment. The facility had sufficient space and equipment to facilitate dining, laundry, visitation, meetings, and resident activities. Hot water temperature at taps accessible to residents were all compliant and measured at 111 F.. There was at least 2 days of perishable food, and at least 7 days non-perishable food present, all safely stored. Cooking/dining equipment and utensils were present. There were no sharp objects, toxic chemicals/poisons, and/or fireplaces accessible to residents. Medications were labeled, as required, and stored in locked areas. No pools or bodies of water were observed on the premises. Per the administrator, no firearms or ammunition are kept at the facility. Smoke alarms, carbon monoxide detectors, emergency lighting, and facility telephone were all working. First aid kit was complete and readily accessible. Required licensing postings were observed in visible areas of the facility. LPA reviewed multiple staff and resident records/files. The reviewed files contained required documents. Confidential records were stored in locked areas. Administrator provided current liability insurance. The administrator was issued an advisory note on 04/17/25 regarding not having annual training regarding emergency disaster plan. As of today, the training has not been completed. In addition, the infection control lead has not obtained required training or trained staff. A deficiency was observed and cited during today's annual inspection. An Advisory Note was also issued. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator, Consuelo Banting to whom a copy of this report and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided during the visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 18, 2026
20251 state visit · 1 document
Apr 17, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Natasha Persaud conducted an unannounced Required Annual Inspection. The facility file was reviewed prior to the visit. LPA was greeted and allowed entry into the facility and conducted the visit with Administrator, Consuelo Banting. According to the facility’s license, the facility has a maximum capacity of six (6) non-ambulatory residents. This facility does not feature a secured perimeter or delayed egress doors. LPA, accompanied by the administrator, toured the interior and exterior of the facility, and inspected each room. The facility was clean, sanitary, and in good repair. Pathways were free of obstruction and slip hazards. Resident bedrooms contained the required furnishings. Doors, windows, toilets, and showers were in working order. Extra linens and hygiene supplies were present, as well as Personal Protective Equipment. The facility had sufficient space and equipment to facilitate dining, laundry, visitation, meetings, and client activities. Hot water temperature at taps accessible to clients measured at 100.6 F. The administrator stated a plumber has been scheduled to come inspect the hot water heater to enure it's in regulation temperature. There was at least 2 days of perishable food, and at least 7 days non-perishable food present, all safely stored. Cooking/dining equipment and utensils were present. There were no sharp objects, toxic chemicals/poisons, fireplaces, or open-faced heaters accessible to clients. Medications were labeled, as required, and stored in locked areas. No pools or bodies of water were observed on the premises. Per the administrator, no firearms or ammunition are kept at the facility. Smoke alarms, carbon monoxide detectors, emergency lighting, and facility telephone were all working. Continued on an LIC 809C. Fire extinguisher was purchased within the last 12 months. First aid kits were complete and readily accessible. Required licensing postings were observed in visible areas of the facility. LPA interviewed multiple staff and clients. LPA reviewed multiple staff and client records/files. The reviewed files did not contain required documents, which is listed on the attached LIC 858 and LIC 859. Confidential records were stored in locked areas. The administrator stated they switched liability insurance company's and was in the process of finalizing the agreement. Deficiencies were observed or cited during today's annual inspection. Advisory Notes were also issued. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator, Consuelo Banting, to whom a copy of this report and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided during the visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 17, 2025

The state marks this report as 7 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 4. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

20242 state visits · 2 documents
Feb 27, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Natasha Persaud conducted an unannounced Required Annual Inspection. The facility file was reviewed prior to the visit. LPA was greeted and allowed entry into the facility and conducted the visit with Staff, Juliana Soriano. Administrator, Consuelo Banting arrived during the visit. LPA, accompanied by staff, toured the interior and exterior of the facility, and inspected each room. The facility was clean, and sanitary, but not in good repair. Bedroom #2's doorway is difficult to open and close, requiring repair, and there's a leak in the bathroom #3's shower, which is filling up a bucket placed in the shower. Pathways were free of obstruction and slip hazards. Resident bedrooms contained the required furnishings. Doors, windows and screens, and toilets, were in working order. Extra linens and hygiene supplies were present, as well as Personal Protective Equipment. However, the facility does not have N95 masks. The facility had sufficient space and equipment to facilitate dining, laundry, visitation, meetings, and resident activities. Hot water temperature at taps accessible to residents were all compliant and measured at 111 F.. There was at least 2 days of perishable food, and at least 7 days non-perishable food present, all safely stored. Cooking/dining equipment and utensils were present. There were no sharp objects, toxic chemicals/poisons, and/or fireplaces accessible to residents. Medications were not in compliance as staff are pre-pouring medications, medication was spilled out in the medication cabinet, PRN medications did not have physician's orders on file, and staff are not documenting PRNs once dispensed. No pools or bodies of water were observed on the premises. Per the licensee's staff, no firearms or ammunition are kept at the facility. Smoke alarms, carbon monoxide detector, emergency lighting, and facility telephone were all working. First aid kit was complete and readily accessible. Not all required licensing postings were present. LPA reviewed multiple staff and resident records/files, which were incomplete and did not contain required documentation. Facility did not have a fire extinguisher available for fire emergencies. Residents are using half and full bed rails without a physician order on file.Staff are not trained annually on the emergency and disaster plan. Staff do not have required training documented. Deficiencies were observed or cited during today's annual inspection along with Technical Advisories. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator, Consuelo Banting to whom a copy of this report and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided during the visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 27, 2024

The state marks this report as 8 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 3. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

Feb 8, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility employed staff without criminal record clearance

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Daniel Pena conducted an unannounced complaint visit to initiate an investigation of the above mentioned allegation. LPA met with Licensee, Consuelo Banting and discussed the elements of the complaint. At the conclusion of the visit, LPA delivered investigative findings to Licensee Banting. LPA's investigation consisted of LPA observation, interviews with staff and outside sources and review of facility and outside source records. On 1/30/2024, The Department received information that Subject 1 (S1) worked at All for Seniors without criminal record clearance. An outside source record revealed, on October 20, 2023, S1 submitted a LIC9182 Criminal Background Clearance Transfer Request to a licensed facility in San Jose. The form showed that S1 requested to transfer their criminal record clearance from All for Senior. The form included All for Senior's facility number and street address which are consistent with the facility's licensing information. Outside source interviews revealed that S1 was hired at the San Jose facility on October 23, 2023. During Unsubstantiated a review of licensing records, it was revealed, S1's finger prints were inactive and the clearance transfer was denied. S1 did not have criminal background clearance to work in a licensed care facility. According to interviews with outside sources and an admission by S1, S1 was hired and worked at the San Jose facility without criminal record clearance. Subsequently, the licensed facility received civil penalties due to Title 22 violation related to criminal record clearances. S1 left employment at the facility. LPA interviewed S1 regarding the aforementioned criminal record clearance where they referenced All for Senior. According to S1, S1 inquired with a friend who worked at All for Seniors in 2023. The friend told S1 to contact the licensee and gave S1 the licensee's telephone number. According to S1 and the licensee, the licensee told S1 to first obtain a criminal background clearance and contact them once it was complete. Admittedly, S1 did not follow through with getting a clearance and was not hired. S1 moved to San Jose where they were hired at the licensed facility previously mentioned. LPA again asked S1 did they ever work at All for Seniors facility and they said they did not. LPA interviewed the licensee and asked them did S1 ever work at All for Seniors. The licensee said S1 did not apply once they were told to obtain a background clearance. The licensee told LPA they are awaiting the results of S1's criminal record clearance as S1 is currently in the process of applying for a position. The Department has investigated the allegation that the facility hired staff without criminal record clearance. Based upon record reviews and interviews, there is insufficient evidence to prove the allegation. The Preponderance of Evidence Standard was not met and as such, the allegation is Unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted with Licensee, Banting and a copy of the report and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC 9058 03/22) were provided to Licensee, Banting, whose signature confirms receipt of receiving the documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 8, 2024 · control 08-AS-20240130153110
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in San Diego County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore San Diego County