Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Nir Community III

Small home·Licensed for 6·San Diego, California

Licensed since 2019Licence #374604264
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · September 27, 2026
  • Starting rate$3,800 a monthListed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026
  • Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit4 of 6 beds occupiedNovember 6, 2025 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitDecember 24, 2025CDSS inspection record

Nir Community III is a small care home in San Diego — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents since 2019. Dementia care is not on file.

Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Nir Community III

Is Nir Community III licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

How many residents is Nir Community III licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Has Nir Community III been cited?

1 Type A and 0 Type B citation since 2019, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 11 state visits over the same years.

Is Nir Community III still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Nir Community III cost?

$3,800 a month to start — listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026.

The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living shared bedroom, seen September 9, 2026.

Among 48 other homes of a similar licensed size in San Diego that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,000 to $6,000 a month, and the middle figure is $5,000 (n = 48 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Nir Community III take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Nir Group, LLC, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Can Nir Community III keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 6 residents, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Nir Community III license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “NIR COMMUNITY III”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #374604264. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed to Nir Group, LLC, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2019, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 11 state inspection visits since 2019, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 1 Type A and 0 Type B citation on file since 2019, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 11 state visits in that period.
  • 4 complaints and 1 substantiated allegation on file since 2019, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is December 24, 2025, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 6 residents
  • Dementia / memory careNot on file · ask the home
  • Hospice careApproved · covers up to 6 residents
  • BedriddenApproved · covers up to 1 resident

State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR SIX (6) NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH ONE (1) MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR SIX (6) RESIDENTS.

935 - ELDERLY

CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 6 — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

4 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation not on file

    Ask: “If memory loss develops, what would change — and when would a move be needed?”

What it costs here

This home’s starting rate

$3,800a month to start

Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026 · See listing

Likely monthly total

$3,800a month

Likely $3,800–$4,400

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · where the price comes from
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room

Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.

  • Starting monthly rate$3,800this home

    The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living shared bedroom, seen September 9, 2026.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $3,800–$4,400
$3,800
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $3,800–$7,900
$5,800
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWhere this price comes from

The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living shared bedroom, seen September 9, 2026.

24 homes like this within 8 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,500–$7,000.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 24 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 10975 Janice Ct, San Diego, CA 92126Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2021, the state has filed 10 documents for this home, and its records count 11 visits since 2019. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated December 24, 2025.

On file since
2021
State visits
11
Most recent visit
December 24, 2025
Occupied · November 6, 2025 visit
4 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 4 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated May 17, 2024 to November 6, 2025. 4 of the 4 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (3). 4 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 4 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations1typical 0
  • Type B citations0typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations1typical 0
  • Total complaints4typical 0

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2019.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated2025351202433020231102021110

The last 36 months — 9 of 10 documents

20253 state visits · 5 documents
Dec 24, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Natasha Persaud conducted an unannounced Required Annual Inspection. LPA was greeted and allowed entry into the facility and conducted the visit with Staff, Milagros Galvan. Administrator, Administrator, Faria Huq arrived during the visit. LPA, accompanied by staff, toured the interior and exterior of the facility, and inspected each room. The facility was clean, sanitary, and in good repair. Pathways were free of obstruction and slip hazards. Resident bedrooms contained the required furnishings. Doors, windows and screens, toilets, and showers were in working order. Extra linens and hygiene supplies were present, as well as Personal Protective Equipment. The facility had sufficient space and equipment to facilitate dining, laundry, visitation, meetings, and resident activities. Hot water temperature at taps accessible to residents were all compliant and measured at 115 F.. There was at least 2 days of perishable food, and at least 7 days non-perishable food present, all safely stored. Cooking/dining equipment and utensils were present. There were no sharp objects, toxic chemicals/poisons, and/or fireplaces accessible to residents. Medications were labeled, as required, and stored in locked areas. No pools or bodies of water were observed on the premises. Per the staff, no firearms or ammunition are kept at the facility. Smoke alarms, carbon monoxide detector, emergency lighting, and facility telephone were all working. First aid kit was complete and readily accessible. Required licensing postings were observed in visible areas of the facility. LPA reviewed multiple staff and resident records/files. The reviewed files contained required documents. Confidential records were stored in locked areas. No deficiencies were observed or cited during today's annual inspection. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator, Faria Huq to whom a copy of this report and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided during the visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 24, 2025
Nov 6, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not provide adequate supervision resulting in residents wandering away from facility

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Natasha Persaud conducted an unannounced visit to commence a complaint investigation. LPA identified herself and was allowed entry into the facility by Staff, Conchita Gallardo. LPA discussed the allegation mentioned above wtih staff present. Administrator, Faria Huq and Licensee, Rana Huq arrived during the visit. During today's visit, LPA briefly toured the facility, reviewed records, interviewed staff, and residents. It was alleged staff did not provide adequate supervision resulting in a resident wandering away from facility. It was reported Resident #1 (R1) wandered away from the facility on 10/29/25. R1's Physician's Report dated 05/08/2023 indicated R1 was ambulatory, and had a diagnosis of a Major Neurocognitive disorder. It also indicated R1 was unable to leave the facility unassisted. On 10/29/25, R1 wandered out the front door and entered the neighbor's house requesting police assistance. Staff interviewed stated one caregiver was assisting a resident in their room, while the other caregiver was assisting another resident. Staff were not aware R1 left the facility usassisted. Staff stated once they realized R1 was missing they went to search for R1. Continued on LIC 9099C. Substantiated R1 was found outside the facility being escorted by the police. R1 did not sustain any injuries. Staff admitted R1 wanders, therefore, a padlock was placed on the front door to prevent R1 from exiting during the day and at night. Also, a lock was placed on R1's sliding door exit of their room. According to Licensee the lock was placed on the sliding door to prevent people from breaking in at night. However, the additional sliding door exits do not have locks. LPA observed an auditory device on the front door. However, it was not activated. The administrator removed the padlock and the lock on the sliding door, and turned on the auditory devices during the visit. In addition, the facility did not have an absentee plan on file for residents. Based on interviews and record review, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be substantiated. California code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6 & Chapter 8 is being cited on the attached LIC 9099D. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report along with Licensee Rights (LIC 9058 03/22) were provided to Staff, Milagros Galvan whose signature below confirms receipt of these rights.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 6, 2025 · control 08-AS-20251029134201

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: HSC 1569.312(d) · Plan of correction due date: Nov 7, 2025

Basic services requirements. Being aware of the resident's general whereabouts, although the resident may travel independently in the community. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews, the licensee did not know the whereabouts of 1 out of 4 [R1] residents, which posed an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 6, 2025

Plan of correction: Administrator, Faria Huq had the locks immediately removed. In addition, they will ensure the auditory devices are operable, and conduct training on ensuring staff are aware of residents whereabouts by POC due date.

Nov 6, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Natasha Persaud conducted an unannounced Case Management - Deficiencies visit. LPA identified herself and was allowed entry into the facility by Staff, Conchita Gallardo. LPA discussed the purpose of the visit with staff present. Administrator, Faria Huq and Licensee, Rana Huq arrived during the visit. During a complaint investigation, it was discovered the licensee did not submit an incident report involving Resident #1 (R1). On 10/29/25, R1 wandered away from the facility and staff were not aware. R1's Physician's Report dated 05/08/2023 indicated R1 was ambulatory, and had a diagnosis of a Major Neurocognitive disorder. It also indicated R1 was unable to leave the facility unassisted. The licensee failed to report the incident. Today, LPA observed the following deficiencies: A padlock on the front door and a locking device on R1's sliding door exit located in their room. Staff explained R1 wanders, therefore, the locks were put in place to prevent R1 from wandering from the facility; Cough syrup was on the kitchen counter, accessible to residents; A new laundry room was built but the lock was inoperable and could not be locked, which made cleaning supplies and items that pose a danger accessible; Sharp tools were observed in the backyard; The resident's files did not contain Absentee Notifications; and medical assessments were not within a year for R1 and Resident #2, as the reports were issued in 2023. In addition, the licensee made alterations to the facility. Licensee stated licensing was not notified of the alterations to the facility because a permit was not required by the City to add a wall, which was added for the new laundry room. Continued on LIC 809C. While at the facility, the licensee emailed LPA proof of permit for the Additional Dwelling Unit (ADU), along with an updated LIC 999 Facility Sketch to identify the new additions. The administrator explained the ADU has renters that have no access to the facility or residents. During the visit, R1 attempted to exit the facility unassisted through their sliding door located in their room. Staff was able to immediately redirect R1. Licensee and administrator were made aware of the exit seeking behavior. They were also notified awake staff was required for wandering residents. They ensured R1's needs will be met. Deficiencies were observed and cited along with a civil penalty for a fire clearance violation. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report along with Licensee Rights (LIC 9058 03/22) were provided to Staff, Milagros Galvan whose signature below confirms receipt of these rights.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 6, 2025

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87202(a) · Plan of correction due date: Nov 7, 2025

Fire Clearance. All facilities shall maintain a fire clearance approved by the city...or the State Fire Marshal. Prior to accepting or retaining...obtain an appropriate fire clearance...or the State Fire Marshal. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observations and interviews, the licensee did not comply with their fire clearance, by using a padlock to lock the front door, enabling residents to exit for 4 out of 4 [R1-R4] residents, which posed an immediate health, safety and personal rights risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 6, 2025

Plan of correction: Administrator removed all locks during the visit. Administrator stated they will provide training regarding supervision and danger in locking residents inside the facility and provide proof of training by POC due date. An immediate $500 civil penalty was assessed for fire clearance violation.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR87465(h)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Nov 7, 2025

Incidental Medical and Dental Care. The following requirements shall apply to medications which are centrally stored: Centrally stored medicines shall be kept in a safe and locked place that is not accessible... supervision of the centrally stored medication. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observations, the licensee did not centrally store medications making them accessible to 1 out of 4 [R1] residents, which posed an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 6, 2025

Plan of correction: Administrator stated they will schedule training on centrally storing medication and provide scheduled training dates by POC due date. In addition, the training will be submitted within 2 weeks.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87309(a) · Plan of correction due date: Nov 7, 2025

Storage Space and Access. Except as specified in subsection (b), the licensee shall ensure that disinfectants, cleaning solutions...tools, sharp objects...are in locked storage and are not left unattended if outside the locked storage. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observations, the licensee did not ensure cleaning supplies and tools were inaccessible to 4 out of 4 [R1-R4] residents, which poses an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 6, 2025

Plan of correction: Administrator locked the tools and replaced the lock on the laundry room, making them inaccessible to residents. Proof of scheduled training for ensuring items are properly stored by POC due date. In addition, proof of training will be submitted within 2 weeks.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR87211(a)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Dec 4, 2025

Reporting Requirements. A written report shall be submitted to the licensing agency...of any of the events specified in (A) through (D) below. This report shall include...date and nature of event...findings, and treatment, if any; and disposition of the case. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews and record review, the licensee did not report an incident for 1 out of 4 [R1] residents, which posed a potential health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 6, 2025

Plan of correction: Administrator stated she will attend training on reporting requirements and submit an incident report for R1 by POC due date.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87463(h) · Plan of correction due date: Dec 4, 2025

Reappraisals. The licensee shall request that all residents receive an annual routine visit with a licensed medical professional once every twelve months, either in person or by video appointment. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews and record review, the licensee did not obtain an annual routine medical visit for 2 out of 4 [R1-R2] residents in care, which posed a potential health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 6, 2025

Plan of correction: Administrator stated R1 and R2 will be evaluated by a medical professional and documentation will be submitted by POC due date.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: HSC1569.317 · Plan of correction due date: Dec 4, 2025

Absentee notification plan for missing residents. Every residential care facility...resident is missing from the facility...plan shall include... administrator...inform authorized representative...notify local law enforcement...is missing from the facility. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews and record review, the licensee did not ensure 4 out of 4 [R1-R4] residents had an absentee notification in their written record of care, which posed a potential health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 6, 2025

Plan of correction: Administrator stated they will submit an Absentee Notification Plan for residents for POC due date.

Jun 30, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Absence of supervision at night Staff are leaving residents in soiled diapers for extended periods of time Licensee did not provide the required quantity or quality of food to meet the needs of the residents Licensee is charging for fees not outlined in admission agreement

LPM II Donna Teutschel conducted a telephone conference with Licensee/Administrator, Rana Huq. A review was conducted of the allegations listed and investigative details available.to date. Facility has night time sleep staff but residents have a call button system that will alert staff if they need assistance. If staff are alerted by a resident to have diaper changed staff respond. No evidence was provided regarding leaving residents in soiled diapers for extended period of time or that food quality was not acceptable. The service fee invoiced for cable was a one-time fee and that was performed by the licensee in procurring a cable box and hooking the cable up to the residents room, cable box and television which was verbally agreed to. The Department is unable to prove or disprove the allegations and the findings are determined to be Unsubstantiated. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 30, 2025 · control 08-AS-20210506084436
Jun 30, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: -Staff refused to assist resident with transfer -Staff required resident to wear diaper -Staff did not ensure resident was hydrated -Staff did not seek medical attention for resident timely

LPM II Donna Teutschel conducted a telephone conference with Licensee/Administrator, Rana Huq. A review was conducted of the allegations listed and investigative details available.to date. The Department is unable to prove or disprove the allegations and the findings are determined to be Unsubstantiated. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 30, 2025 · control 08-AS-20230228093653
20243 state visits · 3 documents
Dec 18, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Natasha Persaud conducted an unannounced Required Annual Inspection. The facility file was reviewed prior to the visit. LPA was greeted and allowed entry into the facility and conducted the visit with Staff, Milagros Galvan and Administrator, Rana Huq. LPA, accompanied by staff, toured the interior and exterior of the facility, and inspected each room. The facility was clean, sanitary, and in good repair. Pathways were free of obstruction and slip hazards. Resident bedrooms contained the required furnishings. Doors, windows and screens, toilets, and showers were in working order. Extra linens and hygiene supplies were present, as well as Personal Protective Equipment. The facility had sufficient space and equipment to facilitate dining, laundry, visitation, meetings, and resident activities. Hot water temperature at taps accessible to residents were all compliant and measured at 108 F.. There was at least 2 days of perishable food, and at least 7 days non-perishable food present, all safely stored. Cooking/dining equipment and utensils were present. There were no sharp objects, toxic chemicals/poisons, and/or fireplaces accessible to residents. Medications were labeled, as required, and stored in locked areas. No pools or bodies of water were observed on the premises. Per the administrator, no firearms or ammunition are kept at the facility. Smoke alarms, carbon monoxide detector, emergency lighting, and facility telephone were all working. First aid kit was complete and readily accessible. Required licensing postings were observed in visible areas of the facility. LPA reviewed multiple staff and resident records/files. The reviewed files contained required documents. Confidential records were stored in locked areas. No deficiencies were observed or cited during today's annual inspection. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator, Rana Huq to whom a copy of this report and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided during the visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 18, 2024
Nov 7, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Natasha Persaud conducted a Case Management - Other visit. LPA was greeted and allowed entry into the facility by Staff, Mila Galvan. Licensee, Faria Huq and Administrator, Rana Huq arrived during the visit. A visit was conducted to investigate an incident involving a resident. During staff interviews, it was discovered the resident does not reside at this facility. The incident will be addressed at the correct facility. No deficiencies were observed today. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report along with Licensee Rights (LIC 9058 03/22) were provided to Staff, Mila Galvan whose signature below confirms receipt of these rights.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 7, 2024
May 17, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Licensee did not treat pest

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Natasha Persaud conducted an unannounced visit to conclude the complaint investigation regarding the above-mentioned allegation. LPA met with Staff, Conchita Gallardo. During the investigation, the facility was toured, records reviewed, and interviews conducted with staff, residents, and outside sources. It was alleged the licensee did not treat pest. It was reported a cockroach was observed in Resident #1’s (R1) cup and around the room approximately two (2) to three (3) months ago. It was also reported the roach was observed two (2) weeks ago. Conflicting statements were made. Staff interviews revealed they have not observed any pest or roaches. However, they are taking precautionary measure by spraying inside and outside of the facility once a week. Outside sources revealed the roach was observed but it was only one (1) time a few months ago and there have not been any other observations of pest or roaches. Resident interviews confirmed there were no pest or roaches observed in the facility. Continued on an LIC 9099C. Unsubstantiated On 05/15/24, LPA toured the facility and observed private and common areas, no pest or roaches were observed. The licensee stated they have not observed any pest or roaches but will be having a professional extermination company coming to the facility as a precautionary measure due to the weather changing, which can bring out pest. During the course of the investigation, interviews were conducted, and records were reviewed. Investigation revealed inconsistent statements and information obtained did not present a preponderance of evidence to support or corroborate the allegation. The allegation was deemed unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report along with Licensee Rights (LIC 9058 03/22) were provided to Staff, Conchita Gallardo whose signature below confirms receipt of these rights. [See LIC 811 Confidential Names List to identify Resident #1]the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 17, 2024 · control 08-AS-20240506103142
20231 state visit · 1 document
Dec 14, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Natasha Persaud conducted an unannounced Required Annual Inspection. The facility file was reviewed prior to the visit. LPA was greeted and allowed entry into the facility by Staff, Milagros Galvan. Licensee, Rana Huq and Administrator, Faria Huq arrived during the visit. LPA, accompanied by staff, toured the interior and exterior of the facility, and inspected each room. The facility was clean, sanitary, and in good repair. Pathways were free of obstruction and slip hazards. Resident bedrooms contained the required furnishings. Doors, windows and screens, toilets, and showers were in working order. Extra linens and hygiene supplies were present, as well as Personal Protective Equipment. The facility had sufficient space and equipment to facilitate dining, laundry, visitation, meetings, and resident activities. Hot water temperature at taps accessible to residents were all compliant and measured at 105 F.. There was at least 2 days of perishable food, and at least 7 days non-perishable food present, all safely stored. Cooking/dining equipment and utensils were present. There were knives and cleaning supplies accessible to residents in the kitchen cabinet and kitchen drawer. Locks were present but not in use. Medications were not stored in locked areas. The medications were pre-poured in containers sitting on the microwave and Afrin spray sitting on a cabinet. No pools or bodies of water were observed on the premises. Per the licensee, no firearms or ammunition are kept at the facility. Smoke alarms, carbon monoxide detectors, emergency lighting, and facility telephone were all working. First aid kit was complete and readily accessible. Required licensing postings were observed in visible areas of the facility. Disaster drills are not being conducted. LPA interviewed multiple staff and residents. LPA reviewed multiple staff and resident records/files. The interviews did not raise any significant licensing concerns. The reviewed files contained required documents. Confidential records were stored in locked areas. Deficiencies were observed during today's annual inspection and cited on the attached LIC 809D. Also, a Technical Advisory was issued. An exit interview was conducted with Licensee, Rana Huq to whom a copy of this report and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided during the visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 14, 2023

The state marks this report as 4 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 3. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in San Diego County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore San Diego County