Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet
Aegis Assisted Living of Aptos
Large community·Licensed for 100·Aptos, California
- Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Dementia · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · September 27, 2026
- Starting rate$6,030 a monthListed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026
- Home sizeLicensed for 100Large care community · a licensed care home (RCFE)
- Room at the last state visit77 of 100 beds occupiedApril 9, 2026 · not a current opening
- Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
- Last state visitApril 23, 2026CDSS inspection record
Aegis Assisted Living of Aptos is a large care community in Aptos — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 100 residents since 2019.
Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.
Quick answers and the state record
A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
Quick answers about Aegis Assisted Living of Aptos
Is Aegis Assisted Living of Aptos licensed?
The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
How many residents is Aegis Assisted Living of Aptos licensed for?
100 residents — a large community, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Has Aegis Assisted Living of Aptos been cited?
1 Type A and 2 Type B citations since 2019, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 18 state visits over the same years.
Is Aegis Assisted Living of Aptos still open?
This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.
What does Aegis Assisted Living of Aptos cost?
$6,030 a month to start — listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026.
The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly, seen September 9, 2026.
Among 5 other homes of a similar licensed size across Santa Cruz County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,116 to $5,105 a month, and the middle figure is $4,295 (n = 5 other homes publishing a starting rate).
Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.
A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.
The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.
A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.
Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
Does Aegis Assisted Living of Aptos take Medi-Cal?
On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Who holds the license?
The license is held by Heather Terrace Aptos LLC;Aegis Sr Communities LLC, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Is there a hospital nearby?
Sutter Maternity & Surgery Center of Santa Cruz is 3.6 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.
Can Aegis Assisted Living of Aptos keep a resident on hospice?
Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 25 residents, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Aegis Assisted Living of Aptos license and inspection record
- Name on the license: “AEGIS ASSISTED LIVING OF APTOS”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
- License #445202706. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- Licensed for 100 residents — a large community, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- Licensed to Heather Terrace Aptos LLC;Aegis Sr Communities LLC, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- First licensed in 2019, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- 18 state inspection visits since 2019, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- 1 Type A and 2 Type B citations on file since 2019, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 18 state visits in that period.
- 4 complaints and 3 substantiated allegations on file since 2019, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
- The most recent state visit on file is April 23, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗
Can they support the care needed?
California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.
- Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 100 residents
- Dementia / memory careApproved by the state
- Hospice careApproved · covers up to 25 residents
- BedriddenApproved · covers up to 100 residents
State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.
Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 100 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 100 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. DELAYED EGRESS APPROVED FOR ALZHEIMER'S WING EXIT DOORS HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 25.
983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA
CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026
As needs change
- Staying through hospice
Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 25 — care may continue at the end of life
Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”
State licensing record · September 27, 2026
- If memory loss develops
Dementia-care designation on file
Ask: “Can we read the dementia care disclosure and discuss how daily support works?”
State licensing record · September 27, 2026
3 more questions to ask the home
- Two-person transfers or a lift
Not on file
Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”
- Someone awake overnight
Not on file
Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”
- Medicines
Not on file
Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”
Care & day-to-day support
These are the home’s own statements about its day-to-day practice — they are not part of the state licensing record, and the state has not approved or reviewed them.
Respite / short-term stays
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.
Help with bathing or showering
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.
Assistance with transfers
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.
Medication management
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.
Works with residents’ own health care providers
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.
Diabetic / carbohydrate-controlled diet
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.
Incontinence care
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.
Help with dressing and grooming
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.
Building is wheelchair accessible
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.
Diabetes care
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.
Nights & staffing
24-hour supervision claimed
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.
Emergency call system
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.
What it costs here
This home’s starting rate
$6,030a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026 · See listing
Likely monthly total
$6,030a month
Likely $6,030–$6,630
With a studio and basic help.
An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.
See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · where the price comes from
Starting monthly rate$6,030this home
The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly, seen September 9, 2026.
Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600
Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).
One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000
Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.
- Likely monthly totalLikely $6,030–$6,630
- $6,030
- First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $6,030–$10,150
- $8,030
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
- Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
- Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
- SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
- VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
- Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
- MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
- The care level
Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.
- What is billed separately
Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.
- Move-in costs
A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.
- Increases
California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.
- What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
- What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
- What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
- Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWhere this price comes from
The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly, seen September 9, 2026.
24 homes like this within 24 miles publish starting rates mostly between $4,100–$5,650.
- Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
- Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
- Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
- Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
- We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
- It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 24 nearby homes behind this estimate
- Dominican OaksSanta Cruz · 4.0 mi · Large community$4,890Listed on Seniorly · assisted living one bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Westwind Memory CareSanta Cruz · 6.2 mi · Large community$5,750Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Sunshine Villa Assisted Living and Memory CareSanta Cruz · 6.3 mi · Large community$4,295Listed on AssistedLiving.com · seen September 9, 2026
- Brookdale Scotts ValleyScotts Valley · 8.1 mi · Large community$4,015Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Montecito ManorWatsonville · 9.5 mi · Large community$4,150Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Merrill Gardens at GilroyGilroy · 17 mi · Large community$3,995Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
- Loma Clara Senior LivingMorgan Hill · 18 mi · Large community$5,395Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
- Belmont Village Los GatosSan Jose · 18 mi · Large community$7,525Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Marbella San JoseSan Jose · 19 mi · Large community$5,250Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
- Westmont of Morgan HillMorgan Hill · 19 mi · Large community$4,250Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- The Watermark at AlmadenSan Jose · 19 mi · Large community$4,995Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Carlton Plaza of San JoseSan Jose · 20 mi · Large community$4,895Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Lincoln Glen Assisted Living CenterSan Jose · 20 mi · Large community$4,250Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Merrill Gardens at CampbellCampbell · 21 mi · Large community$4,900Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Atria Willow GlenSan Jose · 21 mi · Large community$4,495Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Campbell VillageCampbell · 22 mi · Large community$4,200Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Villa FontanaSan Jose · 22 mi · Large community$4,390Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Westgate VillaSan Jose · 22 mi · Large community$4,990Listed on Seniorly · assisted living · seen September 9, 2026
- Merrill Gardens at Willow GlenSan Jose · 23 mi · Large community$4,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Oakmont of San JoseSan Jose · 23 mi · Large community$6,495Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- The Watermark at San JoseSan Jose · 23 mi · Large community$4,995Listed on Seniorly · assisted living studio · seen September 9, 2026
- Belmont Village San JoseSan Jose · 23 mi · Large community$6,250Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Sonnet HillSan Jose · 23 mi · Large community$5,250Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Atria Evergreen ValleySan Jose · 23 mi · Large community$2,995Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
Where it is
- 125 Heather Terrace, Aptos, CA 95003Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.
Opening the neighborhood map…
The state record
California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.
Since 2022, the state has filed 16 documents for this home, and its records count 18 visits since 2019. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated April 23, 2026.
- On file since
- 2022
- State visits
- 18
- Most recent visit
- April 23, 2026
- Occupied · April 9, 2026 visit
- 77 of 100 bedsa count on that day, not an opening
We hold 4 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated October 22, 2024 to April 9, 2026. 4 of the 4 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (1), “Unfounded” (2), “Unsubstantiated” (1). 4 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 4 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.
Beside homes the same size
- Type A citations1typical 0
- Type B citations2typical 1
- Substantiated allegations3typical 2
- Total complaints4typical 6
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,354 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2019.
Year by year
The last 36 months — 14 of 16 documents
Apr 23, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Incident
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Marcella Tarin arrived unannounced to conduct a case management - incident visit. LPA met with General Manager (GM) JP Rollet. LPA stated the purpose of the visit. Medication Error 7/25/2025 The purpose of the visit was to address 2 medication errors that occurred on 7/25/2025 and 4/16/2026. On 7/30/2025, the Department received an incident report regarding a medication error on 07/25/2025 involving Staff S1 giving resident R1 another resident's medication. The incident report states S1 "accidentally gave the medication to another resident." S1 reported the medication error to management, and 911 was called. R1 was taken for observation to the hospital, and returned back to the facility the same day with no injuries. The reports states R1 was monitored by staff for changes in condition after the medication error, and R1's family and primary care physician were notified. On 9/19/2025, a Case Management visit was conducted. During visit, LPA requested copies of the following documents: Disciplinary Notice, In-Service Training Records, physician's reports, Service Plans, Centrally Stored Medication and Destruction Records, and Medication Administration Records (MAR). Medication Error 4/16/2026 On 4/21/2026 the Department received an incident report regarding a medication error on 4/16/2026, involving Staff S2 giving Resident R2, an incorrect dose of medication. Page 1 of 2 The incident report states "Wellness nurse administered the medication but immediately realized that a double dose of the medication was administered. Wellness Nurse admitted to not completely reading the medication order thereby committing the mistake." The incident report notes R2 was observed, vitals were taken and R2 monitored for side effects. During today's visit, LPA interviewed 3 Staff (S1 to S3), 2 Residents (R1 to R2), and 1 Witness (W1). Based on investigation on 4/23/2026, S1 and S2 reported the medication errors to facility management when the errors occurred. Documents were obtained to include S1 and S2 training records, S1 and S2's written disciplinary action, and R1 and R2 physician's reports and care plans. LPA Tarin also conducted a safety check on R1 and R2. LPA observed R1 watching tv in his/her room. R1 did not respond to LPA's questions due to cognitive impairment. LPA observed R2 sleeping in his/her room. LPA observed R2 had a private companion. A civil penalty is being assessed for the amount of $250 for a repeat violation for CCR 87411(a). A previous licensing report issued on 3/16/2026 cited the same deficiency. Please see LIC421FC. Failure to correct the cited deficiency(ies), on or before the Plan of Correction (POC) due date, may result in a civil penalty assessment. A Deficiency was cited per California Code of Regulations, Title 22. See LIC809-D. An exit interview was conducted with GM JP Rollet and a copy of the report and appeal rights were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 23, 2026
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87411(a) · Plan of correction due date: Apr 24, 2026
87411 Personnel Requirements - General (a) Facility personnel shall at all times be...competent to provide the services necessary to meet resident needs This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, record review and interviews,on 7/25/2025 Staff S1 gave another resident's medications to R1. On 4/16/2026, S2 gave an incorrect dose of medication to R2 which poses an immediate health, safety and personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 23, 2026
Plan of correction: Licensee will submit a plan of action on how the facility with work to prevent medication errors by POC due date of 4/23/2026.
Apr 9, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnfounded
Allegation investigated: Facility staff are not allowing resident the right to participate in decision making regarding the care and services to be provided.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Marcella Tarin conducted an unannounced complaint investigation. LPA met with General Manager (GM) JP Rollet. LPA stated the purpose of the visit. On 4/7/2026 the Department received a complaint with the above allegation. On 4/7/2026 the Department interviewed the Reporting Party (RP). RP states a resident, referred to as R1, was not allowed to participate in decision making regarding care. RP states he/she does not agree with the prices the facility charges for resident care. On 4/9/2026 the Department reviewed the facility roster. LPA observed R1 was not a resident of the facility. Page 1 of 2 Unfounded This agency has investigated the complaint alleging facility staff are not allowing resident the right to participate in decision making regarding the care and services to be provided. We have found that the complaint was UNFOUNDED, meaning that the allegation was false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. No deficiencies were cited, per California Code of Regulations, Title 22. An exit interview was conducted with GM JP Rollet and a copy of this report was provided. Page 2 of 2 END OF REPORT.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 9, 2026 · control 26-AS-20260407090909
Apr 9, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: POC
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Marcella Tarin arrived unannounced to conduct a Plan of Correction (POC) visit. LPA met with General Manger (GM) JP Rollet. LPA stated the purpose of the visit. On 3/16/2026 the facility was citing the following Type A deficiency: 87411 Personnel Requirements - (a) LPA received the Plan of Corrections by POC due date. The deficiency is being cleared during today's visit. A Letter of Deficiencies Citations Cleared was provided to GM during visit. No deficiencies were cited, per California Code of Regulations, Title 22. An exit interview was conducted with GM JP Rollet and a copy of this report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 9, 2026
Mar 16, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Marcella Tarin conducted an unannounced annual inspection and met with General Manager (GM) J.P. Rollet. LPA stated the purpose of the visit. LPA toured the interior and exterior of the facility with GM to include the kitchen, resident rooms, dining room, bathrooms, back and front of the facility. All exit and passageways were free and clear of obstruction. LPA observed the facility to be clean, safe, sanitary and in good repair. LPA toured the kitchen area and observed a perishable food supply of at least two days and a non-perishable food supply of at least seven days. LPA observed the refrigerator temperature at 30 F and Freezer at 0 F. LPA observed the medication storage area, knives storage area, and cleaning product storage area as locked and inaccessible to residents in care. The facility was equipped with smoke and carbon monoxide detectors. The facility fire alarm system was inspected by a third party vendor on 9/9/2025 and passed inspection. Fire extinguishers were last serviced on 10/20/2025. The facility emergency drill log was reviewed. The facility's last drill was on 12/20/2025. Page 1 of 2 LPA toured 10 resident bedrooms, residents have a bed, functioning lights, dresser/table, bedding and space for personal belongings. LPA toured 10 resident bathrooms. All 10 bathrooms had hand soap, paper towels, functioning lights, and covered trash bins. LPA measured water temperature with a range of 109.2 F to 113.5 F. During inspection of Resident R1's bathroom, LPA observed inside an unlocked bathroom cabinet above the toilet, a clear plastic bag with oval shaped capsules. LPA observed the pills were half blue and half red in color. LPA also observed a small white prescription pill bottle on the second shelf. To the right of the small white prescription bottle, LPA observed 5 yellow capsules inside a clear plastic storage bin. GM stated R1 could manage his/her medications. Review of R1's physician's report dated 10/2/2023, R1 cannot manage or store his/her medications. R1 also has neurocognitive impairment, with confusion and disorientation. A deficiency is being cited today. LPA reviewed 4 resident records. LPA reviewed 4 resident’s Centrally Stored Medication and Destruction Records (CSMDR’s). LPA reviewed 4 staff records. A deficiency was cited during today's visit per California Code of Regulations Title 22, see LIC809D for more information. An exit interview was conducted with GM J.P. Rollet and a signed copy of this report and appeal rights were provided. Page 2 of 2 END OF REPORTthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 16, 2026
Sep 19, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Marcella Tarin arrived unannounced to conduct a Case Management-Deficiencies visit to follow up on a deficiency cited on 9/11/2025. LPA also followed up on a self reported incident of a medication error reported to the Department on 7/30/2025. LPA met with General Manager (GM) J.P. Rollet. LPA stated the purpose of the visit. The facility was cited the following Type A deficiency on September 11, 2025: 87468.1 Personal Rights: (a)(2), POC due 9/12/2025. LPA received plan of corrections by POC date. Deficiencies cleared during todays visit. POC cleared letter provided to GM. On 7/30/2025, the Department received an incident report regarding a medication error on 07/25/2025 involving Staff S1 giving resident R1 another resident's medication. The incident report states S1 reported the medication error to management, and 911 was called. R1 was taken for observation at the hospital, and returned back to the facility the same day with no injuries. The reports states R1 was monitored by staff for changes in condition after the medication error, and R1's family and primary care physician were notified. During visit, LPA request copies of the following documents: Disciplinary Notice, In-Service Training Records, physician's reports, Service Plans, Centrally Stored Medication and Destruction Records, and Medication Administration Records (MAR). LPA determined the medication error requires further investigation. No deficiencies were cited at this time as per California Code of Regulations Title 22. An exit interview was conducted with GM and signed copy of this report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 19, 2025
Sep 11, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Incident
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Marcella Tarin conducted an unannounced case management visit to follow up on an incident where a resident eloped from the facility. LPA met with General Manager (GM) J.P. Rollet. LPA stated the purpose of the visit. On 7/21/2025, the Department received an Incident Report (IR) dated July 18, 2025, stating Resident R1 had eloped from the facility at approximately 2:50PM. The IR states staff received a report from Staff S7 at approximately 2:50PM, where S7 reported ‘seeing a lady on the street that resembles one our residents.” The facility began a search for R1 and did not locate R1 in his/her room. Staff began a search in the area outside of the facility where S7 reportedly observed R1. R1 was located by facility staff at approximately 3:05PM, sitting on the side of the street across from the local fire station. R1 was being taken by paramedics for assessment due to falling and sustaining an injury to the head. Based on Google Maps search, R1 was located approximately 0.7 miles away from the facility. On 7/22/2025 and 9/11/2025, LPA Tarin interviewed Staff S1 to S6. 3 out of 6 staff did not observe R1 on the day of elopement. S1 and S4 stated he/she saw R1 in the facility between 2:45PM and 2:50PM. S6 states he/she observed R1 between 2:00PM and 2:30PM. 6 out of 6 staff stated R1 has a history of wandering behavior. 2 out of 6 staff stated R1 has eloped from the facility before 7/18/2025. S2 and S4 states R1 eloped in May 2024 but did not provide additional information. 5 out of 6 staff stated R1 has a history of cutting his/her wanderguard bracelet off. S6 did not provide additional information. LPA interviewed General Manager (GM). GM states the elopement occurred during a shift change, and "a lot of traffic was going through the front, which is the only way in and out of the community." Based on review R1’s physician’s report dated 3/27/2024, lists R1’s diagnosis as neurocognitive disorder. R1’s mental condition is listed as confused/disoriented, has wandering behaviors, and R1 is not able to leave the facility unassisted. R1’s service plans dated 6/27/2024 states R1 has exiting seeking behavior, seeks out, loiters near or attempts to exit through doors and/or windows. R1’s Elopement Risk Assessment dated 7/13/2025 states R1 showing wandering and exit seeking behaviors, verbalize a desire to leave community/to go home, resident has a history of previous elopement. R1’s Elopement Risk Assessment also states “ Resident currently with wanderguard, However, resident have been finding ways to cut wanderguard bracelets…in the meantime will continue to replace wanderguard. LPA reviewed previous incident submitted to the Department for R1 and found an elopement that was reported on 5/17/2024, where R1 eloped from the facility on 5/11/2024 when out on a walk. R1 was returned to the facility unharmed. Based on review of R1’s hospital discharge paperwork dated 7/18/2025, R1 sustained a fractured left wrist and a closed head injury during the elopement. An immediate civil penalty of $500.00 is being assessed against the facility today for violation the absence of supervision, which resulted in R1 eloping from the facility. Deficiencies were cited from California Code of Regulations, Title 22 during today’s visit, see LIC 809-D. This report was reviewed with General Manager J.P. Rollet and a copy of the report was provided. Appeal Rights were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 11, 2025
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87468.1(a)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Sep 12, 2025
87468.1 Personal Rights: (a)(2) Each resident shall be accorded safe, healthful and comfortable accommodations, furnishings and equipment. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on interview and record reviews, on 7/18/2025, R1 has neurocognitive disorder and left the facility unassisted and was found by facility staff outside of the community, sustaining injuries. This poses an immediate Health, Safety, or Personal Rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 11, 2025
Plan of correction: ADM stated he will send a written plan of action on how the facility ensures residents with wandering behaviors and neurocognitive disorder will be kept safe. ADM stated he will also send a written letter of understanding regarding the regulation. ADM will submit POC to CCLD by POC due date 9/12/2025.
Jul 22, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Incident
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Marcella Tarin arrived unannounced to conduct a Case Management-Incident visit regarding an Incident Report submitted to the Department on 7/21/2025. LPA met with Health Services Director (HSD) Noel Sapitan and Resident Services Director (RSD) Gloria Escoto. On 7/21/2025 the Department received an incident report for an incident involving Resident R1 on 7/18/2025. LPA toured 1 resident room and the front lobby area with RSD and observed the facility's Wanderguard alarm system. LPA interviewed 1 resident and 6 staff. LPA requested documentation to include needs and services plan, physician's reports, and Wanderguard activity log. LPA determined this incident requires further investigation. No deficiencies were cited during today's visit per California Code of Regulations (CCR) Title 22. An exit interview was conducted with RSD Gloria Escoto and a signed copy of this report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 22, 2025
Mar 26, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Marcella Tarin arrived unannounced to conduct the facility's Required -1 Year inspection and met with General Manager (GM) J.P. Rollet and stated the purpose of the visit. GM states previous General Manager Griselda Galvan retired on 3/21/2025. GM states the facility has 84 residents and 26 staff. LPA toured the interior and exterior of the facility with GM to include but not limited to lobby, dining rooms, kitchen, laundry rooms, 10 resident rooms, 10 bathrooms, and facility activity rooms. All exits and passage ways are free and clear of obstruction. LPA interviewed 6 residents and 3 staff. LPA toured the kitchen area and observed a perishable food supply of at least two days and a non-perishable food supply of at least seven days. LPA observed refrigerator temperature at 31 degrees F and Freezer at 0 degrees F. LPA observed the medication storage area, knives storage area, and cleaning product storage area as locked and inaccessible to clients in care. Fire and smoke detectors were last inspected on 2/20/2025. The facility's emergency drill log was reviewed. The facility's last emergency drill was conducted on 1/26/2025. Facility fire extinguisher was last serviced on 10/14/2024. Page 1 of 2 LPA toured 10 resident rooms and 10 resident bathrooms. LPA measured water temperature with a range of 111.9 to 113.9 degrees F. LPA reviewed 7 resident records. Resident records included emergency contact information, physician’s report, needs and service plans, and personal rights. LPA reviewed 7 resident’s Centrally Stored Medication and Destruction Records (CSMDR’s). LPA reviewed 7 staff records. 7 out of 7 staff records were found to be complete. Staff records included fingerprint background clearance, medical assessment with TB result, personnel record, and staff training. LPA requested the following documentation during inspection for change of administrator: • LIC501 • LIC500 showing J.P. Rollet as ADM (Personnel Record) • LIC200 (application for Community Care Facility or Residential Care Facility for the Elderly License) • LIC308 • LIC 9182 with Admin box checked • Copy of Valid photo ID/DL No deficiencies were cited during today's visit per California Code of Regulations Title 22. An exit interview was conducted with General Manager (GM) J.P. Rollet and a signed copy of this report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 26, 2025
Jan 25, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Administrator is not on the premises a sufficient number of hours to permit adequate attention to the management and administration of the facility. Staff are not ensuring that food is prepared and served in a safe and healthful manner to residents in care.
Allegation: Administrator is not on the premises a sufficient number of hours to permit adequate attention to the management and administration of the facility. During the investigation LPA observed kitchen in need of additional supervision, lack of activities for scheduled time and residents sitting without supervision in the dining area with toxin unlocked and accessible to residents. LPA was told that the Administrator has given notice and other staff are taking the lead when the Administrator is out. Allegation: Staff are not ensuring that food is prepared and served in a safe and healthful manner to residents in care. During the inspection of the kitchen LPA observed mold on bread and missing documentation of Consulting services for dietary requirements needs and overall quality of food services. The Department has investigated the above allegations. Based on interview, record review and observation, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met. Therefore, the above allegation is substantiated. Deficiencies were cited per California Code of Regulations Title 22. See LIC9099-D. Substantiated Allegation: Staff do not ensure that residents' showering needs are being met while in care. Based on unannounced visits, records reviewed and observing processes including medication administration, responding to call buttons, meals and resident care the facility was providing care required under basic care with documentation. All interactions provided the residents with outcomes that met the need of each situation. The department was unable to determine if staff did not ensure that residents were being showered while in care based on the information available. Unsubstantiated. Allegation: Resident developed a bladder infection due to staff neglect. Records reviewed for R1 included discharge summaries and notes at the facility including correspondence with the primary care doctor, the record did not identify lack of supervision or neglect as a cause for treatment of R1's bladder infection. Discharge summaries advise follow-up with the primary care physician and hydration. The department was unable to determine if Resident developed a bladder infection due to staff neglect while in care based on the information available. Unsubstantiated. Allegation: Staff do not respond to residents' requests for assistance in a timely manner. Based on records reviewed and observation the facility did respond in a reasonable amount of time during the department unannounced visits. The facility provided residents with assistance that varied also noted is the activated call button announce the call. The department was unable to determine if Staff did not respond to residents' requests for assistance in a timely manner based on the information available. Unsubstantiated. Allegation: Staff do not ensure that residents receive medical attention in a timely manner. Based on unannounced visits, records reviewed and observing processes including medication administration, responding to call buttons, meals and resident care the facility was providing care required under basic care with documentation. All interactions provided the residents with outcomes that met the need of each situation. The department was unable to determine if Staff did not ensure that residents receive medical attention in a timely manner while in care based on the information available. Unsubstantiated. Allegation: Staff do not ensure that there is communication which encourages family/responsible party involvement with the resident in care. Based on unannounced visits, records reviewed and observing processes including medication administration, responding to call buttons, meals and resident care the facility was providing care required under basic care with documentation. All interactions provided the residents with outcomes that met the need of each situation. The facility provides information in three place including a current life enrichment activities sheet. The department was unable to determine if at the time of the complaint that Staff did not ensure that there was communication which encourages family/responsible party involvement with the resident in care based on the information available. Unsubstantiated. Allegation: Facility is understaffed, Based on unannounced visits, records reviewed and observing processes including medication administration, responding to call buttons, meals and resident care the facility was providing care required under basic care with documentation. All interactions provided the residents with outcomes that met the need of each situation. The department was unable to determine if at the time of the complaint the facility was under staffed. Unsubstantiated. Based on this investigation the allegations may have happened or are valid, however, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the above allegations did or did not occur, therefore these allegations are unsubstantiated.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 25, 2025 · control 26-AS-20230511142716
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87405(H)(1-8) · Plan of correction due date: Jan 27, 2025
The administrator shall have the responsibility to:(1) Administer the facility in accordance with these regulations and established policy, program and budget. (2) Where applicable, report to the licensee on the operation of the facility, and provide the licensee with necessary interpretations of recognized standards of care and supervision. (3) Develop an administrative plan and procedures to ensure clear definition of lines of responsibility, equitable workloads, and adequate supervision. This requirement was not met as evidenced by the kitchen in need of additional supervision, lack of activities for scheduled time and residents sitting without supervision in the dining area with toxin unlocked and accessible to residents. LPA was told that the Administrator has given notice and other staff are taking the lead when the Administrator is out.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 25, 2025
Plan of correction: The facility has appointed a new Administrator.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87555(b)(8) · Plan of correction due date: Feb 14, 2025
(b) The following food service requirements shall apply: (8) All food shall be of good quality. Commercial foods shall be approved by appropriate federal, state and local authorities. Food in damaged containers shall not be accepted, used or retained. The licensee did not provide food of good quality. During the inspection of the kitchen LPA observed mold on bread and missing documentation of Consulting services for dietary requirements needs and overall quality of food services. This poses a potential health risk to residents in care. Staff disposed the expired non-perishable food immediately upon discovery.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 25, 2025
Plan of correction: Licensee to check all the non-perishable food in the pantry and dispose expired food immediately. Consulting services will be included in the plan of correction and sent to the department by 2/14/2025
Dec 26, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility elevator is in disrepair.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Marcella Tarin and David Marrufo arrived unannounced to conduct the initial complaint investigation visit. LPAs met with Assisted Living Director Gloria Escoto. On 12/18/2024, the Department received a complaint with the above allegation. The following documents were obtained for this investigation: resident roster, visitor log, maintenance repair invoice, emergency disaster manual, facility emergency disaster plan. It was alleged that the facility elevator is in disrepair. LPAs observed the elevator permit with a date of inspection of 8/8/2024, and an expiration date of 8/8/2025. See 9099-C Page 1 of 3. Unsubstantiated The permit was issued by the State of California, Department of Industrial Relations, Division of Occupational Safety & Health. LPAs reviewed a copy of the Disaster Response Procedures: Elevator Failure guidelines. The guidelines state staff should check to see if there is anyone is the elevator, the general manager should notify the elevator company for repair and initiate communication protocol. On 12/26/2024, LPAs interviewed Assisted Living Director (ALD). ALD stated the elevator was in disrepair on 12/18/2024. ALD states the elevator was out of service and was repaired that same day. ALD stated the elevator was stuck on the second floor and maintenance was notified. ALD stated the elevator was repaired and working at 2:30PM. ALD states staff and residents were informed of the elevator being in disrepair on 12/18/2024. LPAs interviewed 5 staff. 2 out of 5 staff state the elevator was in disrepair last week. Staff S2, Maintenance Director, stated the elevator was in disrepair on 12/18/2024 at 9am. S2 states he/she was notified by the facility at 9am on 12/18/2024. S2 states before he/she started repairs he/she made sure no one was inside the elevator. S2 was unable to fix the elevator. S2 states staff, residents and visitors were notified that the elevator was not working. S2 states an elevator repair company was called and the elevator was repaired by 2:30PM that same day. Staff S3 states the elevator was in disrepair on 12/18/2024 and was repaired that same day. 3 out 5 staff stated the elevator has not been in disrepair. LPAs interviewed 6 residents. 4 out of 6 residents state the elevator has not been in disrepair. 2 residents declined to be interviewed. LPAs reviewed the elevator repair invoice from the company contracted to repair the elevator. The invoice is dated 12/18/2024, with an incident time of 9:14AM, arrival time of 1:30PM and completion time of 2:30PM. The invoice states the description of the elevator as "elev passenger unit/not resp/stk on 2nd flr". The invoice states the resolution for the elevator as "top floor spirator." The invoice notes the labor hours as 1 hours and 0 minutes for the repair. See 9099-C Page 2 of 3. LPAs reviewed the facility's Disaster and Emergency Manual. Under Emergency Generators, the Manual states that if the facility does not have have a generator, the community will identity at least 2 local rental companies to provide an appropriate generator for the community to rent during an emergency or disaster. LPAs reviewed ALD's file for emergency training. LPAs observed ALD's documentation of Employee Safety Orientation Checklist which includes a training titled "Emergency and Disaster Manual-Location and Contents" which was completed on 1/25/2023. LPAs reviewed the facility's Emergency and Disaster Plan. Under A.) Provisions for Emergency Power, the facility listed 1 generator rental company. During interview, ALD stated the facility does not have a backup generator. ALD stated he/she did not call a generator rental company on 12/14/2024 when the facility experienced a power outage from 6:45 AM to 9:45 PM. ALD stated no attempts were made to restore power on 12/14/2024. ALD stated the electric company was notified about the power outage. ALD states staff conducted extra safety check on residents, meals were delivered to residents, and activities were brought into residents rooms. ALD states all residents were given flashlights and lanterns to use in their rooms. LPAs interviewed 5 staff. 5 out of 5 staff stated the facility has experienced power outages and that the facility does not have a back up generator. 5 staff state when there is a power outage, staff will conduct extra safety checks on residents, assist residents with going upstairs and downstairs, and bring meals to resident rooms. LPAs interviewed 6 residents. 4 out 6 residents stated the facility had a power outage but did not know if the facility had a backup generator. R2 states the facility had one power outage, but did not know the date of the outage. R2 states the power outage did not impact his/her every day routine. R3 states the facility had a power outage about a week and a half ago,and it lasted the whole day. R3 states the staff brought all his/her meals to the room, and had no concerns during the power outage. R6 states the facility has a power outage, but did not remember the date. R6 states he/she has a flashlight and latern in his/her room that was provided by the facility. R6 states he/she uses oxygen, and has back up battery charged oxygen tanks in the event of a power outage. 2 residents declined to be interviewed. See LIC9099-C Page 2 of 3. The Department has investigated the above allegation. Based on interview, record review and observation, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met. Therefore, the above allegation is substantiated. A deficiency was cited per California Code of Regulations Title 22. See LIC9099-D. This report was reviewed with Assisted Living Director, Gloria Escoto, and a signed copy of this report and appeal rights were provided. Page 3 of 3. Based on the interviews conducted with residents, and staff and based on observation and records review, although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the above allegations did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. This report was reviewed with Assisted Living Director, Gloria Escoto, and a signed copy of this report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 26, 2024 · control 26-AS-20241218160216
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87303(a) · Plan of correction due date: Dec 27, 2024
(a) The facility shall be clean, safe, sanitary and in good repair at all times. Maintenance shall include provision of maintenance services and procedures for the safety and well-being of residents, employees and visitors. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Licensee did not ensure that the Emergency Disaster Plan included the contact information for at least two backup generator rental companies and Licensee did not ensure that staff attempted to contact the listed backup generator rental company when the facility was without power from 6:45AM to 9:45PM on 12/14/2024 which poses an immediate safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 26, 2024
Plan of correction: Licensee agrees to submit a plan to CCL by POC date 12/27/2024 to ensure that the Emergency Disaster Plan includes the contact information for at least two backup generator rental companies and staff are provided with in-service training on contacting back up generator rental companies when there is a power outage at the facility. Once in-service training is completed, Licensee shall provide copies of training records to CCL, includings names, dates, training topics, and names and qualifications of trainers.
Nov 23, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Albert Johnson conducted a case management visit on today's date for a health and safety deficiency found during the tour of the facility The following deficiency was observed by staff and LPA: Unlocked toxins under the sink in the memory care unit. The cabinet has a locking devise, however, it is broken and unable to be locked. The toxin were accessible to the four resident seated in the dining area unsupervised. There are 12 resident in the memory care area and two staff working on this date. Deficiency cited on the following 809-D to Title 22 regulations. Exit interview conducted and appeal rights discussed and given. A copy of this report was left with the Lead/the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 23, 2024
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87705(f)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Nov 25, 2024
87705 Care of Persons with Dementia (f) The following shall be stored inaccessible to residents with dementia:(2) Over-the-counter medication, nutritional supplements or vitamins, alcohol, cigarettes, and toxic substances such as certain plants, gardening supplies, cleaning supplies and disinfectants. This requirement was not met as evidenced by observation and photo taken there was unlocked toxins under the sink in the memory care unit. This is an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 23, 2024
Plan of correction: Administrator shall submit a plan to Licensing on how toxins will be locked up in facility and provide toxin training to maintenance staff or any other staff responsible for cleaning. Licensee shall submit curriculum and date of training to Licensing by 11/25/2024. If additional time is needed please request additional time by POC date via email provided on LPA's busniess card.
Nov 6, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Incident
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Marcella Tarin conducted an unannounced case management visit to follow up on an Incident Report (IR) that was received by the Department on 11/5/2024. The IR states a resident eloped from the facility on 11/1/2024. LPA met with General Manager (GM) Griselda Galvan. LPA toured the exterior and interior of the facility, which included Assisted Living (2nd floor), Memory Care (1st floor), the kitchen, office area, resident bedrooms, resident dining area, and courtyards. The facility temperature was 72 degrees F.. During tour of the Memory Care courtyard, LPA observed a gate locked in with zip ties. Staff stated the gate had a work order due to the gate alarm malfunctioning. Staff stated a work order was in place to fix the gate. During a tour of the Assisted Living courtyard, LPA observed gate #5 locked (an emergency exit). Staff unlocked the gate, and the gate key is located in the front office where staff can access in an emergency. All remaining outdoor exits were clear and free of obstruction. LPA toured 5 out of 5 resident bedrooms. Each resident bedroom has functioning lights, a bed, a chair, table/dresser and storage room for personal belongings. The following documentation was requested: resident's service plan, physician's report, resident roster, staff schedule, updated facility sketch, updated emergency disaster plan (LIC610E), and an updated fire clearance. LPA determined the above incident requires further investigation. This report was reviewed with General Manager, Griselda Galvan and a copy of the report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 6, 2024
Oct 22, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnfounded
Allegation investigated: Inadequate staff supervision resulting in medical emergency.
On 10/22/2024, LPA Grace Donato conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit. LPA met with Health Services Director Noel Sapitan and LPA explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation of inadequate staff supervision resulting in medical emergency, reporting party (RP) stated that resident (R1) has diabetes and needs to be closely monitored for complications. This is a known condition that the staff is aware about. The diabetes was not adequately monitored by staff and R1’s foot became infected, gangrenous and resulted in R1 losing half of of the foot. RP believes that this was an oversight of the staff and care and supervision was not adequately provided. page 1 of 2 Unfounded According to the records provided by the facility, based on the assessment done by the facility around April 2021, R1 is independent when it comes to bathing needs, grooming and dressing. Also noted in the progress notes, on 7/19/2021 when it was reported to facility staff that R1 had wounds in his/her toes the, a staff (S1) assessed the wound and advised responsible person (F1) to bring R1 to the emergency room. It was also noted that the R1 was asked when was his/her last shower and the R1 stated that he/she hasn't showered in a while and didn't notice the condition on the toes. LPA was also able to obtain the blood sugar monitoring log. Part of the log reviewed was from April 04, 2021 to July 7/11/2021. Blood sugar was checked every 7 days, every morning per doctors orders. It is noted on the notes every Sunday. The facility uses the finger stick blood glucose monitoring. Based on records review, the department has determined that that the allegation was false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis, therefore the allegation is UNFOUNDED. Report is reviewed and copy is provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 22, 2024 · control 26-AS-20210802092325
Mar 13, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Maria (Mita) Partoza conducted an unannounced required annual inspection and met with facility Administrator (ADM) Griselda Galvan The facility's census is 82 resident and 82 staff. LPA toured the facility, including entryway, common room, dining room, kitchen, laundry room, 6 bedrooms, 6 bathrooms, medicine room, and activities room. LPA toured the exterior of the facility and observed all walkways are free from obstruction. No prohibited items were observed in the resident rooms. All emergency exits are clear from obstruction. The facility has housekeeping schedule for the residents. LPA toured the memory care section and tested the door alarms and found it to be in good working condition. Facility has activities scheduled posted for the whole month. LPA observed residents participating during activity time. LPA tested the facility water temperature. Water temperature measured between 112 to 116 degree Fahrenheit. LPA observed sufficient supply of food, 2 days of perishable food and 7 days for non-perishable food. Fire extinguisher was last inspected on 10/16/2023. All toxins are kept in a locked room. Knives are locked and is not accessible to residents. LPA reviewed the facility's fire alarm log. The fire alarms system for the entire building were tested on 3/6/2024 and 3/7/2024 and found to be in good working conditions. continued to LIC 809C page 1 of 2 LPA interviewed 2 facility staff. LPA reviewed 4 resident files and 4 staff files and found records to be complete and updated. LPA reviewed the Centrally Stored Medication and Destruction Report for 4 residents and found all records to be updated. No deficiency was cited during today's visit per CCR Title 22. This report was reviewed with Administrator Griselda Galvan and a copy of the signed report was provided. End of Report page 2 of 2the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 13, 2024
What the state’s words mean
CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗
Life here
Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.
Find a detail about life at this home.
Rooms & the spaces they will use
Private bathroom
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.
Outdoor spaceOutdoor common space · Patio · Garden · Walking paths
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.
Room typesOne Bedroom · Studio
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.
Common areasBistro · Grill · Dining room · Fitness room · Business room · Library · and 5 more
Bistro · Grill · Dining room · Fitness room · Business room · Library · Arts room · Activity room · Movie theater · Game room · Spa / sauna / wellness room — reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.
Rooms come furnished
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.
LaundryDone by staff
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.
Wifi in resident rooms
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.
Visitor parking
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.
Air conditioning in the room
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.
AmenitiesFireplace · Concierge · Move-in coordination
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.
Cable or satellite TV
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.
Housekeeping
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.
Kitchenette in the unit
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.
Salon or barber
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.
Telephone in the room
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.
Meals, preferences & familiar food
Dining styleRestaurant style
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.
Special diets supportedLow / No Sodium
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.
All-day or flexible dining
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.
Vegetarian or vegan optionsVegetarian
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.
Meals provided
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.
Cultural cuisine regularly servedInternational
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.
Professional chef
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.
Food allergy management
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.
Activities & the rhythm of a day
Activity types offeredVolunteer program · Music programs · Scheduled daily activities · Movie nights · Outdoor programs · Resident band or musicians · and 19 more
Volunteer program · Music programs · Scheduled daily activities · Movie nights · Outdoor programs · Resident band or musicians · Bridge club · Book club · Bible study group · Current events club · Cards / pinochle club · Happy hour · Cooking classes · Live dance or theater performances · Holiday parties · Dances · Art classes · Has karaoke · Trivia games · Live well programs · Has birthday parties · Wine tasting · Walking club · Has wii bowling · Has garden club — reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.
Trips outside the home
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.
Resident-run activities
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.
Religious services at the home
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.
Religious services off site
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.
Faith, culture & language
Languages spoken by caregiversEnglish
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.
Pets, routines & independence
Residents may bring a pet
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.
Pet types allowedDogs · Cats
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.
Visiting & staying involved
Support services for families
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.
Transportation
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.
- Open on the website
URL of a video tour
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.
Before you call
Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.
- What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
- Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
- Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
- What could change whether someone can stay here?
- Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?
Other homes nearby
The nearest licensed homes in Santa Cruz County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.
Seaview Guest Home
Aptos · Small home · 0.3 mi away
$4,800 a month to start · Listed by the home
Rachelle's Home III
Soquel · Mid-size home · 2.1 mi away
$4,650 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Valley Haven III
Santa Cruz · Mid-size home · 3.7 mi away
$3,500 a month to start · Listed by the home
Paradise Assisted Care
Santa Cruz · Mid-size home · 3.8 mi away
$3,800 a month to start · Listed by the home
Maple House II
Santa Cruz · Mid-size home · 3.9 mi away
$4,200 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Live in Serenity
Santa Cruz · Mid-size home · 4.0 mi away
$4,300 a month to start · Covelight estimate