Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Maple House II

Mid-size home·Licensed for 40·Santa Cruz, California

Licensed since 2024Licence #445202946
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Dementia · HospiceState licensing record · September 27, 2026
  • Estimated starting rate$4,200 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $3,300–$5,500
  • Home sizeLicensed for 40Mid-size care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitDecember 12, 2025CDSS inspection record
  • Licence holderDivine Senior Care Inc.Since 2024 · 2 licensed homes

Maple House II is a mid-size care home in Santa Cruz — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 40 residents since 2024. Bedridden care is not on file.

Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Maple House II

Is Maple House II licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

How many residents is Maple House II licensed for?

40 residents — a mid-size home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Has Maple House II been cited?

0 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2024, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 5 state visits over the same years.

Is Maple House II still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Maple House II cost?

$4,200 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,300–$5,500. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 24 homes with 7 to 49 beds and similar homes within 21 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 5 other homes of a similar licensed size in Santa Cruz that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,313 to $4,563 a month, and the middle figure is $3,800 (n = 5 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Maple House II take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Divine Senior Care Inc., per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. See the homes licensed to Divine Senior Care Inc. — at least 2 on the state roster.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Sutter Maternity & Surgery Center of Santa Cruz is 1.2 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Maple House II keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Maple House II license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “MAPLE HOUSE II”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #445202946. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed for 40 residents — a mid-size home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed to Divine Senior Care Inc., per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2024, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 5 state inspection visits since 2024, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2024, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 5 state visits in that period.
  • 0 complaints and 0 substantiated allegations on file since 2024, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • The most recent state visit on file is December 12, 2025, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 40 residents
  • Dementia / memory careApproved by the state
  • Hospice careApproved by the state
  • BedriddenNot on file · ask the home

State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 40 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 8 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER GRANTED FOR 15. NO BEDRIDDEN CLIENTS IN ROOMS 15 & 16.

983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA

CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation on file

    Ask: “Can we read the dementia care disclosure and discuss how daily support works?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

3 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$4,200a month to start

Likely $3,300–$5,500

From 24 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$4,200a month

Likely $3,300–$5,650

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room
  • Starting monthly rate$4,200likely $3,300–$5,500

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 24 homes with 7 to 49 beds and similar homes within 21 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $3,300–$5,650
$4,200
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,000–$8,700
$6,200
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 24 homes with 7 to 49 beds and similar homes within 21 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

24 homes like this within 21 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,400–$5,500.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 24 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 2000 Brommer Street, Santa Cruz, CA 95062Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2024, the state has filed 5 documents for this home, and its records count 5 visits since 2024. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated December 12, 2025.

On file since
2024
State visits
5
Most recent visit
December 12, 2025

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations0typical 0
  • Type B citations0typical 1
  • Substantiated allegations0typical 2
  • Total complaints0typical 6

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,354 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2024.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20252202024330

The last 36 months — 5 of 5 documents

20252 state visits · 2 documents
Dec 12, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Marcella Tarin conducted an unannounced annual inspection and met with Administrator (ADM) Rose Anne Roxas. LPA stated the purpose of the visit. LPA toured the interior and exterior of the facility with ADM to include but not limited to the the kitchen, resident rooms, dining room, bathrooms, back and front of the facility. All exit and passageways were free and clear of obstruction. LPA toured the kitchen area and observed a perishable food supply of at least two days and a non-perishable food supply of at least seven days. LPA observed the refrigerator temperature at 35 F and Freezer at 0 F. LPA observed the medication storage area, knives storage area, and cleaning product storage area as locked and inaccessible to residents in care. The facility was equipped with smoke and carbon monoxide detectors. The smoke detectors were inspected by a third party vendor on 9/17/2025 and passed inspection. Fire extinguishers were last serviced on 3/10/2025. The facility emergency drill log was reviewed. The facility's last drill was on 11/26/2025. LPA toured 5 random resident bedrooms. All 5 resident rooms have a bed, functioning lights, dresser/table, bedding and space for personal belongings. LPA toured 5 bathrooms. All 5 bathrooms had hand soap, paper towels and covered trash bins. LPA measured water temperature with a range of 116.2 F to 118.7 F. Page 1 of 2. During inspection, LPA followed up on a deficiency issued on 11/7/2025 regarding the elopement of a resident on 10/29/2025. The POC was received by the POC due date 11/8/2025. LPA tested 3 exit doors in the facility and observed 3 out 3 exit doors to have an auditory alarm when tested by the ADM. LPA also reviewed staff training, conducted on 11/5/2025 to include Resident's Wandering (Dementia). A Letter of Deficiency Citations Cleared was provided during the visit today. LPA reviewed 3 resident records and 2 Centrally Stored Medication and Destruction Records (CSMDR’s). LPA reviewed 3 staff records. No deficiencies were cited during today's visit per California Code of Regulations Title 22. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator Rose Anne Roxas and a signed copy of this report was provided. Page 2 of 2. END OF REPORTthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 12, 2025
Nov 7, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Incident

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Marcella Tarin conducted an unannounced case management visit to follow up on an incident report, which stated a resident had eloped from the facility. LPA met with Administrators (ADMs) Rose-Anne Roxas and Anshu Gupta. LPA stated the purpose of the visit. Elopement 10/29/2025 On 10/31/2025 the Department received an incident report regarding a resident (referred to as R1) who eloped from the facility on 10/29/2025. According to the report, on 10/29/2025 around 5:45PM, R1 'went outside of the facility unattended from his/her room while staff was helping the other residents in the dining room, when they heard the beeper, staff starting looking for the resident and they found out that R1 is not inside his/her room. They went outside the facility and saw R1 walking and took him back inside the facility." On 10/31/2025 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Maria 'Mita' Partoza interviewed Administrator (ADM) Anshu Gupta. ADM stated R1 eloped from the facility between 5:45PM and 5:47PM. ADM stated R1 had finished eating dinner, stood up and went to his/her room. ADM stated a staff member went with R1 to his/her room and placed a tab alarm device on R1, and the staff then went back to the kitchen to assist with other residents. ADM stated there were additional staff on shift, including the cook when the elopement occurred. ADM initially stated it took staff '3 to 4 minutes' to respond to the alarm (beeper). ADM then stated staff responded immediately to the alarm (beeper). ADM stated she observed R1 at the facility when she arrived at approximately 6:00PM. ADM stated R1 was located on the next street over from the facility. Page 1 of 2 On 11/5/2025 LPA Tarin interviewed ADM Anshu Gupta. ADM stated on 10/29/2025 R1 had removed his/her tab alarm, but R1 was also wearing a Wanderguard, which alarmed when R1 exited the facility. ADM stated staff located R1 on the sidewalk corner of Chanticleer Ave and Brommer Street. ADM stated R1 walked right onto Brommer Street and walked to Chanticleer Ave, where staff found him/her. ADM stated R1 was returned back to the facility and R1's responsibly parties were informed. ADM states R1 was not injured during the elopement. Based on a Google Map search, staff located R1 on the sidewalk of a 4 way intersection approximately 400 feet from the facility. On 11/7/2025, LPA interviewed Administrator (ADM) Rose-Anne Roxas. ADM stated R1 walked out through the facility front door on 10/29/2025. ADM demonstrated the path which R1 took when he/she eloped from the facility on 10/29/2025. ADM walked LPA Tarin through R1's elopement path, through the facility front door, and out to the front of the facility, which leads to Brommer Ave. LPA observed there is no sidewalk leading to Chanticleer Ave, only a bike lane, next to 2 street lanes. LPA interviewed R1. R1 did not provide additional information due to neurocognitive disorder. Based on a review of R1’s Physician’s report, dated 10/2/2025, R1 has neurocognitive disorder and cannot leave the facility unsupervised. R1's Needs and Service Plan dated 10/14/2025, R1 is "forgetful, disoriented, fall risk, and increased cognitive decline." A Deficiency was cited per California Code of Regulations, Title 22 during today’s visit, see LIC809-D. An exit interview was conducted with Administrators Rose-Anne Roxas and Anshu Gupta. A copy of this report and appeal rights were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 7, 2025

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87468.1(a)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Nov 8, 2025

87468.1 Personal Rights: (a)(2) Each resident shall be accorded safe, healthful and comfortable accommodations, furnishings and equipment. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interviews, R1 cannot leave the facility unsupervised. R1 left the facility unsupervised on 10/29/2025, which poses an immediate health, safety and personal rights risks to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 7, 2025

Plan of correction: ADM stated she will send a written plan of action on how the facility will ensure residents with neurocognitive disorder will be kept safe. ADM stated he will also send a written letter of understanding regarding the regulation. ADM will submit POC to CCLD by POC due date 11/8/2025

20243 state visits · 3 documents
Dec 11, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Prelicensing

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Marcella Tarin and David Marrufo arrived unannounced to conduct a pre-licensing visit to follow up on corrections and deficiencies that were observed on 10/22/2024 during a previous pre-licensing visit. On 10/22/2024 during a pre-licensing visit with LPAs Mita Partoza and Marcella Tarin, deficiencies were observed and documented in the Pre-Licensing report. LPAs observed the dishwasher in the kitchen was corroded and 2 parking lot cement stoppers were cracked. The current licensee needed to address that equipment and that the physical plant are in good repair with no breaks, cracks or chips. On 10/23/2024 the facility submitted pictures of the removal of the parking lot cement stoppers. On 12/11/2024, LPAs observed there were no broken parking lot cement stoppers in the parking lot. LPAs also observed the dishwasher to be free of corrosion. Applicant states the facility is in the process of replacing the current dishwasher with a new one. LPAs reviewed the Fire Safety Inspection Request dated 11/04/2024, which indicated a capacity for 8 bedridden residents. The LIC200 Application for a Community Care Facility or Residential Care Facility for the Elderly License indicated a bedridden capacity for 15. LPAs advised applicant to re-submit the LIC200 to Centralized Application Bureau (CAB) for the bedridden increase request. During visit, LPAs reviewed Component III with Applicant Anshu Gupta. No deficiencies were cited today per California Code of Regulations Title 22. This report was reviewed with Applicant Anshu Gupta and a copy of this report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 11, 2024
Oct 22, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Prelicensing

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Marcella Tarin and Maria (Mita) Partoza arrived unannounced to conduct the facility's pre-licensing visit. LPAs met with Anshu Gupta (Vice President/Applicant) and Rose Anne Roxas (House Manager/Administrator). There are 21 residents present on site. This facility address is currently licensed (435294274) and is under a change of ownership. During visit, LPAs toured the inside and outside of the facility to include the kitchen, dining, living room, garage, activity room, 22 resident rooms, 2 staff rooms, 1 office room. 6 out of 22 resident rooms have shared bathrooms. 1 out of 22 resident rooms are shared. 21 out of 22 residents’ rooms are single occupancy. All fire exit routes were free and clear of obstruction. LPAs observed 5 storage sheds located on the back and side perimeters of the facility. All 5 sheds are used for storage and not habitual space. Toxins observed secured. Facility has a laundry area inaccessible to residents. Each resident room has their own exit doorway leading out to the perimeter. 16 cameras were observed in public areas: lobby, driveway (Parking lots), facility hallways, exit doors, and all-around perimeter of the facility, kitchen area, and laundry. No cameras were observed in resident rooms, 16 cameras were observed in total throughout the facility. No bodies of water were observed. Bathrooms supplied with hygiene products and paper supplies. LPAs observed the smoke and carbon monoxide detectors to be in working condition. Hot water temperature maintained between 112.4 to 116.9 degrees Fahrenheit. Facility temperature maintained at 73 degrees Fahrenheit. First aid kit supplied with tweezers, bandages, gauze, scissors, and thermometer. Medications are stored in a locked cabinet. See 809-C LPAs observed a nonperishable food supply of 7 days and a perishable food supply of 2 days. LPAs observed sharp supplies in a locked cabinet in the kitchen. The following posters observed to include the emergency telephone numbers, personal rights, and facility sketch. Fire extinguisher was inspected on 03/13/2024. Areas of corrections were discussed during today's visit with the applicant, such as the facility sketch and the Emergency Disaster Plan (LIC610E). LPAs observed the dishwasher in the kitchen was corroded and 2 parking lot cement stoppers were cracked, current licensee, needs to address that equipment and that the physical plant are in good repair with no breaks, cracks of chips. Pre-Licensing is incomplete with corrections/deficiencies to be resolved by 11/6/2024. The applicant stated an order for a dishwasher has been placed. A follow up Pre-licensure LIC809 will be generated upon resolution of corrections/deficiencies. An exit interview was conducted with Anshu Gupta (Vice President/Applicant) and Rose Anne Roxas (House Manager/Administrator. No deficiencies were cited. A copy of this report was provided to Anshu Gupta. End of reportthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 22, 2024
Sep 16, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Office

Facility Type: RCFE Application Type: CHOW Capacity: 40 Census (if any clients in care): COMP II Participants: ROSE ANNE ROXAS/ADMINISTRATOR Interview Method: Telephone interview On 9/16/24, applicant/administrator participated in COMP II. Identification of the applicant and administrator was verified through interview questions based on photo ID and other identifying personal information. During COMP II, applicant and administrator confirmed that they have read and understand community care facility licensing laws included in the Health and Safety Codes and the California Code of Regulations Title 22. Signed LIC 809 with copy of photo ID have been obtained. During COMP II, CAB analyst confirmed Applicant/Administrator’s understanding of following areas: 1. Facility operation: License type, client/resident populations, and program 2. Admission Policies 3. Staffing requirements & Training 4. Restrictive/Prohibited Health Conditions 5. General provisions 6. Emergency Preparedness 7. Complaints & Reporting 8. Pre-licensing readinessthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 16, 2024
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Who holds the licence

Divine Senior Care Inc., licensed since 2024, operates 2 licensed homes in California. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in Santa Cruz County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Santa Cruz County