Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet
Lincoln Glen Assisted Living Center
Large community·Licensed for 93·San Jose, California
- Care approvals on fileWheelchair · HospiceState licensing record · September 27, 2026
- Starting rate$4,250 a monthListed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026
- Home sizeLicensed for 93Large care community · a licensed care home (RCFE)
- Room at the last state visit40 of 93 beds occupiedOctober 16, 2025 · not a current opening
- Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
- Last state visitSeptember 17, 2026CDSS inspection record
Lincoln Glen Assisted Living Center is a large care community in San Jose — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 93 residents since 2001. Dementia care and bedridden care are not on file.
Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.
Quick answers and the state record
A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
Quick answers about Lincoln Glen Assisted Living Center
Is Lincoln Glen Assisted Living Center licensed?
The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
How many residents is Lincoln Glen Assisted Living Center licensed for?
93 residents — a large community, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Has Lincoln Glen Assisted Living Center been cited?
0 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2001, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 17 state visits over the same years.
Is Lincoln Glen Assisted Living Center still open?
This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.
What does Lincoln Glen Assisted Living Center cost?
$4,250 a month to start — listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026.
The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly, seen September 9, 2026.
Among 14 other homes of a similar licensed size in San Jose that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,500 to $6,250 a month, and the middle figure is $4,995 (n = 14 other homes publishing a starting rate).
Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.
A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.
The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.
A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.
Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
Does Lincoln Glen Assisted Living Center take Medi-Cal?
On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Who holds the license?
The license is held by Lincoln Glen Manor for Senior Citizens, Inc., per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Is there a hospital nearby?
Children's Healthcare Organization of Northern California - Pediatric Hospital is 3.1 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.
Can Lincoln Glen Assisted Living Center keep a resident on hospice?
Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 5 residents, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Lincoln Glen Assisted Living Center license and inspection record
- Name on the license: “LINCOLN GLEN ASSISTED LIVING CENTER”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
- License #435200941. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- Licensed for 93 residents — a large community, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- Licensed to Lincoln Glen Manor for Senior Citizens, Inc., per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- First licensed in 2001, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- 17 state inspection visits since 2001, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- 0 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2001, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 17 state visits in that period.
- 1 complaint and 0 substantiated allegations on file since 2001, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
- The most recent state visit on file is September 17, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗
Can they support the care needed?
California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.
- Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 93 residents
- Dementia / memory careNot on file · ask the home
- Hospice careApproved · covers up to 5 residents
- BedriddenNot on file · ask the home
State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.
Read the state’s own wording
LICENSED TO SERVE AGES 60 AND ABOVE. ALL MAY BE NONAMBULATORY. A FIRE CLEARANCE FOR DELAYED EGRESS AND BEDROOM WINDOW LOCKS HAS BEEN GRANTED FOR THE DEMENTIAL BUILDEING. THE LICENSE IS SUBJECT TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE HOSPICE WAIVER FOR FIVE (5).
935 - ELDERLY
CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026
As needs change
- Staying through hospice
Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 5 — care may continue at the end of life
Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”
State licensing record · September 27, 2026
4 more questions to ask the home
- Two-person transfers or a lift
Not on file
Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”
- Someone awake overnight
Not on file
Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”
- Medicines
Not on file
Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”
- If memory loss develops
Dementia-care designation not on file
Ask: “If memory loss develops, what would change — and when would a move be needed?”
Care & day-to-day support
These are the home’s own statements about its day-to-day practice — they are not part of the state licensing record, and the state has not approved or reviewed them.
Respite / short-term stays
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.
Help with bathing or showering
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.
Assistance with transfers
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.
Medication management
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.
Therapies availablePhysical therapy
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.
Diabetic / carbohydrate-controlled diet
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.
Parkinson's care experience
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.
Help with dressing and grooming
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.
Building is wheelchair accessible
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.
Works with residents’ own health care providers
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.
Diabetes care
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.
Nights & staffing
24-hour supervision claimed
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.
Emergency call system
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.
What it costs here
This home’s starting rate
$4,250a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026 · See listing
Likely monthly total
$4,250a month
Likely $4,250–$4,850
With a studio and basic help.
An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.
See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · where the price comes from
Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.
Starting monthly rate$4,250this home
The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly, seen September 9, 2026.
Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600
Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).
One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000
Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.
- Likely monthly totalLikely $4,250–$4,850
- $4,250
- First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,250–$8,350
- $6,250
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
- Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
- Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
- SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
- VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
- Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
- MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
- The care level
Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.
- What is billed separately
Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.
- Move-in costs
A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.
- Increases
California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.
- What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
- What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
- What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
- Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWhere this price comes from
The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly, seen September 9, 2026.
12 homes like this within 5 miles publish starting rates mostly between $4,450–$6,400.
- Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
- Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
- Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
- Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
- We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
- It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 12 nearby homes behind this estimate
- Atria Willow GlenSan Jose · 1.3 mi · Large community$4,495Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- The Watermark at AlmadenSan Jose · 1.5 mi · Large community$4,995Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Marbella San JoseSan Jose · 2.2 mi · Large community$5,250Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
- Merrill Gardens at Willow GlenSan Jose · 2.4 mi · Large community$4,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Carlton Plaza of San JoseSan Jose · 2.8 mi · Large community$4,895Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Belmont Village Los GatosSan Jose · 3.0 mi · Large community$7,525Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Merrill Gardens at CampbellCampbell · 3.1 mi · Large community$4,900Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Sonnet HillSan Jose · 3.1 mi · Large community$5,250Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Oakmont of San JoseSan Jose · 3.3 mi · Large community$6,495Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- The Watermark at San JoseSan Jose · 3.4 mi · Large community$4,995Listed on Seniorly · assisted living studio · seen September 9, 2026
- Belmont Village San JoseSan Jose · 4.2 mi · Large community$6,250Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Campbell VillageCampbell · 4.6 mi · Large community$4,200Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
Where it is
- 2671 Plummer Avenue, San Jose, CA 95125Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.
Opening the neighborhood map…
The state record
California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.
Since 2021, the state has filed 17 documents for this home, and its records count 17 visits since 2001. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated September 11, 2026.
- On file since
- 2021
- State visits
- 17
- Most recent visit
- September 17, 2026
- Occupied · October 16, 2025 visit
- 40 of 93 bedsa count on that day, not an opening
We hold 1 complaint report the state published for this home, dated October 16, 2025. 1 of the 1 carries the state's recorded outcome word: “Unsubstantiated” (1). 1 includes the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 1 complaint report below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.
Beside homes the same size
- Type A citations0typical 0
- Type B citations0typical 1
- Substantiated allegations0typical 2
- Total complaints1typical 6
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,354 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2001.
Year by year
The last 36 months — 13 of 17 documents
Sep 11, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Manuel Monter conducted an unannounced annual inspection visit, and met with Administrator Melissa Docog. LPA explained the purpose of the visit. LPA toured the facility inside of the assisted living and memory care unit with ADM which included the Living room, kitchen, dining room, restrooms and residents bedrooms. LPA randomly toured the following bedrooms: 211, 204, 203, 202, 102, 103, 113, 114, 115, 101, 414, 415, 418, 419, 420, 421, 422, 423, 423, 427, 426. LPA tested every delayed egress exit in the memory care unit, which were observed to be functional. There was no obstruction to block the walkways. The staff area of the facility was also inspected. The front yard and backyard were inspected. Two-day perishable food supplies and seven day nonperishable food supplies were observed. LPA observed the medication storage area, knives storage area, and cleaning product storage area as locked and inaccessible to residents in care. Room temperature was at 70 degrees F, and hot water temperature was measured to range from 112-116 degrees F in resident bathrooms. Fire extinguisher was serviced in January 21, 2026. The facility was equipped with smoke and carbon monoxide detectors. Facility sprinkler system was last inspected on July 14, 2026 by CINTAS. LPA observed facility first aid kit and facility fire/earthquake drill log. The facility's last drill was on August 13, 2026. LPA reviewed facility disaster plan, which was last reviewed/updated on September 11, 2026. LPA reviewed facility records for 4 staff and 4 residents. LPA reviewed 4 resident medications and centrally stored medication records. No deficiencies cited during today's visit. This report was reviewed with Administrator Melissa Docog and a copy of the signed report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 11, 2026
Aug 28, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Other
Licensing Program Analyst Manuel Monter conducted an unannounced case management to amend a Complaint investigation (26-AS-20260514093441), LIC9099, LIC9099-C issued on June 19, 2026. LPA met with Administrator Melissa Docog explained the purpose of the visit. The complaint investigation closed on June 19, 2026 is being amended and re-opened due to new information provided to the Department. During today's visit, LPA requested ADM sent a copy of the facility program regarding wander guard. No deficiencies cited during todays visit. This Report was reviewed with Administrator Melissa Docog. A signed copy was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 28, 2026
Aug 4, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Other
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Manuel Monter arrived unannounced to follow up on the previous deficiencies and plan of corrections that were cited. LPA met with Brad Mortenson and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA toured the facility inside and out with ADM. During the tour, LPA tested the delayed egress in the memory care unit, labeled south gate. When LPA pressed, the door opened, without activating the sound. ADM activated the delayed egress on by turning the key switch. ADM noted the interior doors that lead to the back patio, where delayed egree "south gate" located, also has an alarm, when the door is opened. ADM Melissa Docog, stated the facility will conduct an all service training regarding the delayed egress. ADM Melissa Docog stated she will submit proof of training to LPA by August 7, 2026. A technical violation was given during todays visit. This report was reviewed with ADM Melissa Docog and a copy of the report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 4, 2026
Oct 16, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Resident sustained injuries due to lack of supervision
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Monter conducted an unannounced complaint inspection to deliver the findings on the above allegation. LPA met with Acting Director of Health Services Scott Self. On October 1, 2025 the Department received a complaint alleging resident sustained injuries due to lack of supervision. It has been alleged that staff’s neglect/lack of supervision resulted in R1 sustaining injuries on September 28, 2025. On October 6, 2025, the Department received an incident report regarding R1, dated September 28, 2025. The incident report stated, on September 28, 2025, around 4:45pm, R1 was found lying face down on the floor, next to his/her recliner. R1 was noted with bleeding to his/her left temple and top of his/her nose. 911 was called. Page 1 Out of 3. Unsubstantiated On October 3, 2025, LPA Monter conducted the initial complaint investigation visit. LPA attempted to interview resident R1. R1 stated he/she declined to be interviewed. LPA interviewed staff S1-S7. 7 Out of 7 staff interviewed stated R1 needs assistance with transfers from bed/ recliner /wheel chair. 7 Out of 7 staff interviewed stated R1 is a fall risk. 5 Out of 7 staff (S2- S4, S6, S7) interviewed stated they were not working at the facility on September 29, 2025 during the PM shift, when R1 fell. S1 stated on September 28, 2025, around 4pm, R1 requested to be taken to his/her room to sit on his/her recliner. S1 stated he/she assisted R1 to his/her room. S1 stated 15 minutes later, he/she went to assist another resident, who’s room was in the same direction. S1 stated as he/she was passing by R1’s room, he/she did a visual check on R1, who was still seated on his/her recliner. S1 stated when a staff walks by R1’s room, R1’s recliner is within the line of sight of the hallway and stated on September 28, 2025, R1’s room door was open. S1 stated after he/she had finished helping another resident, he/she heard a thud sound. S1 stated he/she entered R1’s bedroom around 4:30pm and saw R1 sitting next to the recliner. S1 stated R1 was assessed by the hospice nurse who advised R1 going to the hospital. S5 stated on September 29, 2025, he/she saw R1 last around 4pm, in the activity area. S5 stated R1 was taken to his/her room by staff S1. S5 stated at around 4:30-4:40pm, was when R1 was found to have fallen by staff S1. S5 stated he/she was in the activity area of the memory care unit when this happened. S5 stated he/she didn’t hear any yells, screams or calls for help. On October 7 and 9, 2025, LPA Monter interviewed staff S8 and S9. S8 stated he/she wasn’t working on September 29, 2025, when R1 had fallen. Page 2 Out of 3. S9 stated when he/she clocked in on September 29, 2025 around 2:00pm, he/she saw R1 seated in the living room. S9 stated while she was working in the med room, some time has passed. S9 stated a resident R2 had called for assistance and went to assist this resident. S9 stated as he/she was headed to R2’s Bedroom, he/she saw that R1 was no longer in the living room. S9 stated R1’s room is in the walkway and as he/she passed R1’s room, he/she saw from the hallway that R1 was seated on his/her recliner. S9 stated after assisting R2, he/she returned to the med room and saw R1, still seated on his/her recliner. S9 stated he/she didn’t check the time and doesn’t know exactly what time he/she saw R1 last. S9 stated when he/she returned to the medroom, he/she was preparing the 5pm medications. S9 stated then one of the new staff informed him/her that R1 had fallen. S9 stated he/she then went to check R1 immediately. S9 stated he/she observed R1 has sustained an injury due to the fall. On October 16, 2025, LPA Monter interviewed Staff Acting Director of Health Services Scott Self, referred to as HS. HS stated R1 is currently a 1 person assist for all ADLs. HS stated R1 can get up on his/her own but has weakness. HS the facility is doing 2 hour checks for R1. HS stated if R1 tries to get up, staff will assist R1 in going to where he/she wants to go. HS stated R1 has a pendant if he/she needs help, but will spend most of his/her day in the living room. HS R1 is considered a fall risk. The Department reviewed R1's Physician's Report dated June 3, 2025. Based on a review of R1’s Physician's Report, R1 has a neurocognitive disorder. R1 requires assistance with repositioning and transferring. The Department reviewed R1's Needs and Services Plan, dated August 30, 2024. R1’s Needs and Services Plan states that R1 needs to be escorted back to room after activity as needed. Remind resident to ask for assistance when the need for toileting comes. Assist with lowering and raising of clothing. Based on investigation, records reviewed, and interviews conducted, the Department found that the above allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. An unsubstantiated finding indicates that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the allegations did or did not occur. Page 3 Out of 3.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 16, 2025 · control 26-AS-20251001111956
Oct 16, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Manuel Monter arrived unannounced to deliver the results of a complaint investigation 26-AS-20251001111956. During the complaint investigation, a case management deficiencies visit was conducted due to violations discovered during the investigation process. LPA is also following up on an incident report received on 10/16/2025. LPA met with Acting Director of Health Services Scott Self Wile investigating the complaint 26-AS-20251001111956, regarding R1, LPA noted issues in resident R1's Care plan. The Department reviewed resident R1’s Progress notes. Progress note dated August 7, 2025 states around 2:30pm, R1 had an unwitnessed fall in his/her bathroom. R1 claimed he/she slipped when trying to use his/her toilet. R1 was able to move all extremities without pain, no complaints of pain, no visible bruises. Progress note dated September 27, 2025, R1 had an unwitnessed fall around 1:40pm. Staff brought resident to his/her room to rest on recliner, then 10 minutes later, a thud was heard. Staff checked on R1 and found him/her next to recliner. Resident was assisted, and no injuries noted. On October 6, 2025, the Department received an incident report regarding R1, dated September 27, 2025. The incident report stated, on September 27, 2025, around 1:40pm, R1 was found sitting on the floor next to his/her chair. R1 stated he/she lost his/her balance and fell. Hospice noticed a small lump on the right side of head. R1 denies pain. R1’s POA was notified and stated he/she didn’t want R1 to be sent to the hospital. Based on a review of R1’s Physician's Report, dated June 3, 2025, R1 has a neurocognitive disorder. R1 requires assistance with repositioning and transferring. The Department reviewed R1’s Needs and Services Plan, Dated August 30, 2024. The Care plan states R1 needs to be escorted back to room after activity as needed. Remind resident to ask for assistance when the need for toileting comes. Assist with lowering and raising of clothing. Based on a review, this care plan was not updated to address R1's requiring assistance with transferring and does not detail a plan to address R1's recent falls prior to September 28, 2025. Incident Report October 11, 2025 On October 16, 2025, the Department received an incident report regarding resident R2. The incident report stated, on October 11, 2025, at 9:00pm, the family of R2 brought a new prescription, medication M1. Family did not inform medtech they had already given dose to resident when they arrived. Med tech started the medication and resident was given a double dose within an hour. On October 16, 2025, LPA interviewed Acting Director of Health Services Scott Self, (HS). HS stated the medtech did not follow procedures when receiving a new medication. HS stated the medtech did follow facility procedures, and did not do a physical count of the medication that just arrived, before administering the medication. HS stated they are doing an in-service today regarding medication administration guidelines and receiving medication administration. Based on a review of R2's physician's report, dated, March 13, 2025, R2 cannot store or administer his/her own medications. Deficiencies are being cited per California Code of Regulations, Title 22. See LIC809-D. This report was reviewed with Acting Director of Health Services Scott Self and a copy of the report and appeal rights were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 16, 2025
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87465(a)(4) · Plan of correction due date: Oct 23, 2025
87465 Incidental Medical and Dental Care(a) (4) The licensee shall assist residents with self-administered medications as needed. This requirement was not met as evidenced by; Based on investigation, the facility administered an additional dose of M1. Medtech did follow facility procedures, and didn't do a physical count of the medication that just arrived. This poses a potential health, safety and personal rights risks to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 16, 2025
Plan of correction: HS stated they are doing an in-service today regarding medication administration guidelines and receiving medication administration. HS stated he will send LPA documenation this training has taken place. HS stated he will send a copy to LPA by POC due date October 23, 2025
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR87463(a) · Plan of correction due date: Oct 23, 2025
87463 Reappraisals (a) The pre-admission appraisal,... shall be updated in writing as frequently as necessary... to note significant changes in condition... to keep the appraisal accurate... This requirement was not met as evidenced by; Based on record review, R1's Needs and Services plan was not updated to address R1's falls that occured on 8/7/25 and 9/27/25, and how the facility will address this need. This poses a potential health, safety and personal rights risks to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 16, 2025
Plan of correction: HS stated on September 28, 2025, R1's care plan was updated to address R1's falls. HS stated he will send a letter of understanding regarding the regulation. HS stated he will send a copy to LPA by POC due date October 23, 2025
Oct 10, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Incident
On October 10, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst Manuel Monter conducted an unannounced Case Management visit to cite a deficiency that was inadvertently not cited on the previous visit. LPA met with Administrator Brad Mortensen. LPA explained the purpose of the visit. On September 26, 2025, the Department conducted an initial visit to investigate the reported incident involving staff S1 physical abuse towards resident (R1), which occurred on October 18, 2024. Staff 1 (S1) employment was terminated October 21, 2024. On October 3, 2025, LPA Monter provided a letter "Order to Licensee/Facility of Immediate Exclusion From Facility" That the department determine that S1 engaged in conduct inimical as a staff in the facility. ADM was informed to remove S1 from any contact with residents and S1 may not be physically present in any facility. ADM agreed and understood. During today's visit, The Department issued citation under HSC 1569.50(a)(3). S1's action towards R1 is considered Conduct inimical to the health, morals, welfare, or safety of residents in care An exit interview was conducted with Administrator Brad Mortensen. Appeal rights was discussed and a copy of the report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 10, 2025
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: HSC 1569.50(a)(3) · Plan of correction due date: Oct 11, 2025
1569.50 Denial, suspension or revocation of license; ...exclusion from licensee without right to petition for reinstatement (a)(3) Conduct that is inimical to the health, morals, welfare, or safety ... from the facility or the people of the State of California. This requirement was not met as evidenced by; Based on interviews conducted, and evidenced reviewed, staff S1 pushed resident R1, causing R1 to fall. This pose/poses an immediate health, safety and personal rights risks to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 10, 2025
Plan of correction: Administrator ADM stated that S1's employment was immediately terminated on October 21, 2024 and reported the incident to law enforcement, APS and LTCO. ADM stated that they will provided staff training elder abuse and on warnig signs on unusual incidents that may harm residents. ADM stated he will submit documenation showing this training has taken place, which will include; the staff participating (with their signature), the duration of the training, and the person who conducted the training. ADM stated he will submit the plan of correction to CCLD by POC due date, October 11, 2025.
Oct 8, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Incident
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Manuel Monter conducted an unannounced Case Management - Incident visit to follow up on the visit conducted on September 26, 2025. LPA met with Administrator Chelsea Chanduloy. On September 25, 2025, the Department received a report which stated on October 18, 2024, staff S1 had pushed R1, one time, causing R1 to fall from his/her walker and onto the ground, resulting in a laceration to R1's head. S2 stated he/she heard a verbal altercation coming from the hallway. S2 stated when he/she went to see what had occurred, he/she saw R1 down on the ground and bleeding from his/her head. S2 stated he/she went to help R1 but S1 pushed S2 to the ground with two hands. The purpose of the visit is to hand deliver an immediate exclusion letter for an individual (S1) who the Department determined engaged in conduct inimical as a staff in the facility. The letter was sealed and handed to Administrator Chelsea Chanduloy No deficiencies cited during todays visit. This report was reviewed with Administrator Chelsea Chanduloy and a copy of the report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 8, 2025
Oct 3, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Manuel Monter conducted an unannounced annual inspection visit, and met with Administrator (ADM) Chelsea Chanduloy. ADM stated the facility currently has 15 residents in memory care and 27 in assisted living. LPA explained the purpose of the visit. LPA toured the facility inside out with ADM which included the Living rooms, kitchen, dining room, restrooms and residents bedrooms in both the assisted living and memory care sections of the facility. LPA toured the following, but not limited bedrooms:215, 110, 102, 108, 416, 405, 410, 405, 415, 414, 409/ There was no obstruction to block the walkways. Two-day perishable food supplies and seven day nonperishable food supplies were observed. LPA observed the medication storage area, knives storage area, and cleaning product storage area as locked and inaccessible to residents in care. Room temperature was at 76 degrees F, and hot water temperature was measured to range from 112-116 degrees F in resident bathrooms. Fire extinguishers were serviced on February 7, 2025. The facility was equipped with smoke and carbon monoxide detectors. ADM stated the last time the sprinkler system was inspected on July 25, 2025. LPA observed facility first aid kit and facility fire/earthquake drill log. The facility's last drill was on October 2, 2025. LPA reviewed facility records for 4 staff and 4 residents. LPA reviewed 4 resident medications and centrally stored medication records. No deficiencies cited during today's visit. This report was reviewed with Administrator Chelsea Chanduloy and a copy of the signed report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 3, 2025
Sep 26, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Incident
Licensing Program Analyst Manuel Monter conducted an unannounced case management visit in regards to a report Department received regarding R1, which occurred on October 18, 2024. LPA met with Administrator James B Mortensen and explained the purpose of the visit. On September 25, 2025, the Department received a report which stated on October 18, 2024, staff S1 had pushed R1, one time, causing R1 to fall from his/her walker and onto the ground, resulting in a laceration to R1's head. S2 stated he/she heard a verbal altercation coming from the hallway. S2 stated when he/she went to see what had occurred, he/she saw R1 down on the ground and bleeding from his/her head. S2 stated he/she went to help R1 but S1 pushed S2 to the ground with two hands. During the visit, LPA interviewed resident R1, Staff S1 and ADM. LPA requested after visit summary documentation for R1's hospital visit after the altercation. . LPA determined this incident requires further investigation. No Deficiencies cited. This report was reviewed with Administrator James B Mortensen. And a copy of the report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 26, 2025
Apr 24, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: POC
On April 24, 2025, LPA Monter conducted a case management POC visit. LPA met with Assisted Living Administrator Chelsea Chanduloy On April 7, 2025, the Department received an incident report (LIC624) regarding a resident (referred as R1) who eloped from the facility. According to the report, on April 5, 2025, around 4pm, resident R1 got out through the side gate. R1 was found by members of St. Christopher’s Church. Members of St. Christopher’s Church called R1’s family member with his/her phone. R1 was brought back to the facility by his/her family who met R1 there. On April 16, 2025, an unannounced Case Management – Incident was conducted. The following deficiencies were cited during visit with a POC due date of April 17, 2025, and were cleared during today’s visit. 87411 Personnel Requirements - General(a) / Type A. Cleared during visit. 87468.1 Personal Rights: (a)(2) / Type A. Cleared during visit. No deficiencies cited during today’s visit. A copy of the report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 24, 2025
Apr 16, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Incident
Licensing Program Analyst Manuel Monter conducted an unannounced case management visit-incident regarding an incident report, which stated a resident had eloped from the facility. LPA was also conducting a POC visit LPA met with Memory Care Director (MCD) Evelyn Lax. LPAs explained the purpose of the visit. On April 7, 2025, the Department received an incident report (LIC624) regarding a resident (referred as R1) who eloped from the facility. According to the report, on April 5, 2025, around 4pm, resident R1 got out through the side gate. R1 was found by members of St. Christopher’s Church. Members of St. Christopher’s Church called R1’s family member with his/her phone. R1 was brought back to the facility by his/her family who met R1 there. On April 7 and April 10, 2025, LPA Monter interviewed ADM James Mortensen and Staff S1. ADM and S1 stated R1 doesn't have propensity for wandering. ADM and S1 stated the building R1 was at, has delayed egress. ADM stated the doors make an audible sound and a sound stating the door had been activated, via the walkie talkie. ADM stated R1 exited thru the delayed egress. ADM stated the staff went to investigate. ADM stated staff stated the door alarm was not heard by the staff. ADM stated the staff went and deactivated the door. ADM and S1 stated the staff did not follow the protocol and do a head count after the door alarm activated. ADM and S1 stated the elopement occurred around 4pm. ADM and S1 stated maybe by 5pm R1 was found. ADM stated and S1 stated R1 was found at St. Christopher's Church. (Based on a google maps review of the location R1 was found, R1 was 0.9 miles away from the facility). ADM stated the churchgoers contacted the R1’s family member. ADM and S1 R1’s family member brought R1 back to the facility. Page 1 Out of 2. On April 10, 2025, LPA Monter interview Witness W1. W1 stated the day of the elopement she/he received a phone call from his/her family member, at 5:24pm. W1 stated his/her family member had called him/her to tell her that R1 managed to leave the facility and was found at the St. Christopher's church. W1 stated he/she immediately called the facility to inform them. W1 called R1 who had his/her cell phone and confirmed he/she was at the church. W1 stated he/she went to the church to pick up R1. W1 stated R1 was standing with a churchgoer, who stated R1 attended the entire mass. W1 stated he/she brought R1 back to the facility. Based on a review of R1’s Physician’s Report, dated February 21, 2025, R1 has a neurocognitive disorder. The physician’s report also states R1 has wandering behavior. The Department reviewed R1’ s Needs & Services Plan (ANS) dated March 5, 2025. The ANS states that one of R1’s Needs/Problem is including wandering. Furthermore, the ANS states, R1 will not leave the facility without proper supervision & staff will supervise resident and be aware of whereabouts at all times. As a result, the department issued an immediate civil penalty of $500 for absence of supervision, which resulted in R1 eloping from the facility. An additional Civil Penalty of $250 is being cited for a repeat violation, for the following code section: 87411 Personnel Requirements - General (a), which was cited during a case management visit on April 3, 2025. Deficiencies were cited from California Code of Regulations, Title 22 during today’s visit, see LIC 809-D. This report was reviewed with Memory Care Director Evelyn Lax and a copy of the report was provided. Appeal Rights was provided. Page 2 Out of 2. END OF REPORT.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 16, 2025
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87411(a) · Plan of correction due date: Apr 17, 2025
87411 Personnel Requirements - General (a) Facility personnel shall at all times be...competent to provide the services necessary to meet resident needs This requirement was not met as evidenced by Based on investigation, on 04/05/25, R1 had exited the facility via the delayed egress. ADM stated staff went & deactivated the door, but did not do a head count after the alarm activated.This poses an immediate Health, Safety, or Personal Rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 16, 2025
Plan of correction: MCD stated the facility conducted an in-service for staff regarding: Elopment policies and protocols. MCD provided LPA with copy of training conducted on April 10, 2025. MCD provided LPA with documenation during Visit.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR87468.1(a)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Apr 17, 2025
87468.1 Personal Rights: (a)(2) Each resident shall be accorded safe, healthful and comfortable accommodations, furnishings and equipment. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on investigation, on 04/05/2025, R1 with a neurocognitive disorder left the memory care unit unassisted and was found 0.9 miles away from the facility, unsupervised. This poses an immediate Health, Safety, or Personal Rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 16, 2025
Plan of correction: MCD stated they have upgraded the alarm system. MCD stated they have also added another alarm system, that will page the radio, which informs staff which door had been activiated. MCD stated they have also change the faciltiy entry procedure and added additonal elopement risk questions to apprisal. MCD stated they have also implemented weekly elopement training, wherin she will activate the delayed egress and note response time. MCD stated the facility also implemented a wander guard as well. MCD provided LPA with documenation during Visit.
Apr 3, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Incident
Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Manuel Monter arrived unannounced to conduct a case management visit to follow up on a medication error. LPAs met with Assisted Living Administrator (AL) Chelsea Chanduloy and stated the purpose of the visit. On February 24, 2025 the Department received an Incident Report for a medication error of Resident R1 that occurred on February 22, 2025. The incident report states, resident R1 was accidentally administered the wrong dose of medicine. Instead of Medication M1's 25mg tablet, a medication M2 50 mg tablet was given. On April 3, 2025, LPA interviewed AL. AL stated the medication error only occurred once. AL stated what occurred that day, resident R1 told staff that he/administered two larger tablets instead of two smaller tablets that afternoon. AL stated R1 was administered the wrong dosage. AL stated the very same day R1's doctor/ family was notified. AL stated staff was told observe the resident and check blood pressure. AL stated R1 did not have a change to his her status the same day and the following day. AL stated R1 continued on his/her regular routine, with no issues noted. AL stated staff S1 was given training. AL stated the health services coordinator went over R1's medications with staff S1 to ensure R1's medications are being administered as prescribed. LPA received copies of R1's training's. Page 1 out of 2. Based on a review of R1's physician's report dated, August 7, 2019, R1 cannot administer his/her own medications. A deficiency is being issued during today's visit per California Code of Regulations, Title 22, see LIC809D. An exit interview was conducted with Assisted Living Administrator Chelsea Chanduloy and a copy of this report was provided. Appeal rights were also provided. Page 2 Out of 2.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 3, 2025
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87411(a) · Plan of correction due date: Apr 4, 2025
87411 Personnel Requirements - General (a) Facility personnel shall at all times be...competent to provide the services necessary to meet resident needs This requirement was not met as evidenced by Based on investigation, on 2/22/2025, Staff S1 administered 1 incorrect dose of medication M1 to R1 which poses an immediate health, safety and personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 3, 2025
Plan of correction: Administrator stated the facility conducted an in-service for staff S1 on medication training on 2/22/2025. ADM provided documentation of in-service training conducted on 2/22/2025. ADM stated she will also be conducting another hands on training on 4/4/25, and will send LPA documentation showing the training has been completed.
Oct 17, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Manuel Monter conducted an unannounced annual inspection visit, and met with Administrator Jame B Mortensen. During the visit, ADM stated the facility has 8 residents in memory care and 30 residents in assisted living. LPA explained the purpose of the visit. LPA toured the facility inside out with ADM which included the Living room, kitchen, dining room. LPA toured facility assisted living restrooms and bedrooms, such as, but not limited to rooms: 215, 214, 206, 212, 111, 108, 104, 103, 113, LPA also toured the facility's memory care unit. LPA toured the bedrooms and restrooms, such as, but not limited to rooms: 408, 409, 412, 421,422,424. The staff area of the facility was also inspected. The front and back of the facility was inspected. There was no obstruction to block the walkways. Two-day perishable food supplies and seven day nonperishable food supplies were observed. LPA observed the medication storage area, knives storage area, and cleaning product storage area as locked and inaccessible to residents in care. Room temperature was at 79 degrees F, and hot water temperature was measured at 110 - 112 degrees F in both resident bathrooms. Fire extinguisher was serviced in February 12, 2024. The facility's sprinkler system was last checked on August 26, 2024. LPA observed facility first aid kit and facility fire/earthquake drill log. The facility's last drill was on October 2024. LPA reviewed facility records for 5 staff and 5 residents. LPA reviewed 5 resident medications and centrally stored medication records. LPA conducted interviews with 2 staff and 4 residents. No deficiencies cited during today's visit. This report was reviewed with Prospective Administrator Chelsea Chanduloy and a copy of the signed report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 17, 2024
What the state’s words mean
CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗
Life here
Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.
Find a detail about life at this home.
Rooms & the spaces they will use
Private rooms
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.
Outdoor spaceOutdoor common space · Garden · Walking paths
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.
Shared / companion rooms
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.
Common areasCafe · Dining room · Library · Arts room · Activity room · Movie theater · and 4 more
Cafe · Dining room · Library · Arts room · Activity room · Movie theater · Game room · Spa / sauna / wellness room · Fitness room · Business room — reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.
Private bathroom
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.
LaundryDone by staff
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.
Room typesOne Bedroom · Studio
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.
Visitor parking
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.
Rooms come furnished
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.
AmenitiesConcierge · Move-in coordination
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.
Wifi in resident rooms
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.
Housekeeping
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.
Air conditioning in the room
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.
Cable or satellite TV
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.
Kitchenette in the unit
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.
Telephone in the room
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.
Meals, preferences & familiar food
Dining styleRestaurant style
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.
Food allergy management
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.
All-day or flexible dining
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.
Meals provided
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.
Professional chef
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.
Set menu
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.
Activities & the rhythm of a day
Activity types offeredMusic programs · Scheduled daily activities · Movie nights · Outdoor programs
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.
Resident-run activities
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.
Faith, culture & language
Languages spoken by caregiversEnglish · Spanish · Tagalog
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.
Pets, routines & independence
Residents may bring a pet
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.
Visiting & staying involved
Support services for families
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.
Transportation
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.
Before you call
Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.
- What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
- Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
- Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
- What could change whether someone can stay here?
- Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?
Other homes nearby
The nearest licensed homes in Santa Clara County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.
Villa Antonio
San Jose · Small home · 0.1 mi away
$5,000 a month to start · Listed by the home
Compassionate Senior Care
San Jose · Small home · 0.2 mi away
$4,950 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Willow Glen Senior Living
San Jose · Small home · 0.2 mi away
$4,800 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Hillsdale Senior Living
San Jose · Small home · 0.5 mi away
$4,900 a month to start · Covelight estimate
A Home at Shaw
San Jose · Small home · 0.6 mi away
$5,000 a month to start · Listed by the home
Meridian Villa
San Jose · Small home · 0.7 mi away
$4,950 a month to start · Covelight estimate