Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet
Rachelle's Home III
Mid-size home·Licensed for 26·Soquel, California
- Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · September 27, 2026
- Estimated starting rate$4,650 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $3,650–$6,100
- Home sizeLicensed for 26Mid-size care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
- Room at the last state visit11 of 26 beds occupiedApril 13, 2026 · not a current opening
- Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
- Last state visitApril 13, 2026CDSS inspection record
Rachelle's Home III is a mid-size care home in Soquel — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 26 residents since 2024. Dementia care is not on file.
Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.
Quick answers and the state record
A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
Quick answers about Rachelle's Home III
Is Rachelle's Home III licensed?
The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
How many residents is Rachelle's Home III licensed for?
26 residents — a mid-size home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Has Rachelle's Home III been cited?
0 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2024, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 8 state visits over the same years.
Is Rachelle's Home III still open?
This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.
What does Rachelle's Home III cost?
$4,650 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,650–$6,100. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 24 homes with 7 to 49 beds and similar homes within 19 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Among 7 other homes of a similar licensed size across Santa Cruz County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,575 to $4,663 a month, and the middle figure is $4,000 (n = 7 other homes publishing a starting rate).
Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.
A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.
The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.
A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.
Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
Does Rachelle's Home III take Medi-Cal?
On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Who holds the license?
The license is held by Rachelle's Home III Inc., per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Is there a hospital nearby?
Sutter Maternity & Surgery Center of Santa Cruz is 1.9 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.
Can Rachelle's Home III keep a resident on hospice?
Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 10 residents, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Rachelle's Home III license and inspection record
- Name on the license: “RACHELLE'S HOME III”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
- License #445202879. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- Licensed for 26 residents — a mid-size home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- Licensed to Rachelle's Home III Inc., per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- First licensed in 2024, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- 8 state inspection visits since 2024, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- 0 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2024, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 8 state visits in that period.
- 3 complaints and 0 substantiated allegations on file since 2024, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
- The most recent state visit on file is April 13, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗
Can they support the care needed?
California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.
- Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 14 residents
- Dementia / memory careNot on file · ask the home
- Hospice careApproved · covers up to 10 residents
- BedriddenApproved · covers up to 3 residents
State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.
Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 26 AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 14 MAY BE NON-AMBULATORY AND 3 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. WAIVER/GRANTED FOR HOSPICE CARE FOR 10.
935 - ELDERLY
CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026
As needs change
- Staying through hospice
Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 10 — care may continue at the end of life
Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”
State licensing record · September 27, 2026
4 more questions to ask the home
- Two-person transfers or a lift
Not on file
Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”
- Someone awake overnight
Not on file
Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”
- Medicines
Not on file
Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”
- If memory loss develops
Dementia-care designation not on file
Ask: “If memory loss develops, what would change — and when would a move be needed?”
What it costs here
Covelight estimate
$4,650a month to start
Likely $3,650–$6,100
From 24 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file
Likely monthly total
$4,650a month
Likely $3,650–$6,250
With a shared room and basic help.
An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.
See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.
Starting monthly rate$4,650likely $3,650–$6,100
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 24 homes with 7 to 49 beds and similar homes within 19 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600
Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).
One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000
Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.
- Likely monthly totalLikely $3,650–$6,250
- $4,650
- First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,400–$9,200
- $6,650
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
- Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
- Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
- SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
- VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
- Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
- MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
- The care level
Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.
- What is billed separately
Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.
- Move-in costs
A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.
- Increases
California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.
- What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
- What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
- What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
- Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 24 homes with 7 to 49 beds and similar homes within 19 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
24 homes like this within 19 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,300–$5,300.
- Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
- Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
- Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
- Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
- We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
- It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 24 nearby homes behind this estimate
- Seaview Guest HomeAptos · 2.0 mi · Small home$4,800Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Valley Haven IIISanta Cruz · 2.1 mi · Mid-size home$3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Paradise Assisted CareSanta Cruz · 2.2 mi · Mid-size home$3,800Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Twin Lakes ManorSanta Cruz · 3.1 mi · Mid-size home$4,250Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Hanover Guest HomeSanta Cruz · 3.6 mi · Mid-size home$2,750Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- The Maple HouseSanta Cruz · 3.9 mi · Mid-size home$5,500Listed on AssistedLiving.com · seen September 9, 2026
- Rachelle's Home IFreedom · 10 mi · Mid-size home$4,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Bonhomie ISan Jose · 16 mi · Small home$4,200Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Harmonie HomeSan Jose · 17 mi · Small home$4,200Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Silicon Valley Senior Care HomeSan Jose · 17 mi · Small home$3,600Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Friendship HouseSan Jose · 17 mi · Small home$4,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Camden Senior LivingSan Jose · 17 mi · Small home$5,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Sandy's Residential Care HomeSan Jose · 18 mi · Small home$4,200Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Pendar's Residential CareSan Jose · 18 mi · Small home$4,200Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Mayflower Care HomeSan Jose · 18 mi · Small home$4,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Villa VerdeSan Jose · 18 mi · Small home$5,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Mina's Elderly Care Home @ VasonaLos Gatos · 18 mi · Small home$3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Roxbury Elderly CareLos Gatos · 18 mi · Small home$6,000Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
- Princess Care Home #4San Jose · 18 mi · Small home$4,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Juliette's Gardens (Rose)San Jose · 18 mi · Small home$4,100Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Bed of Roses Residential Care HomeCampbell · 18 mi · Small home$4,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Palm Villas, CampbellCampbell · 19 mi · Mid-size home$6,400Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Safe Haven Villa Care HomeSan Jose · 19 mi · Small home$3,200Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Constantin's Care HomeSan Jose · 19 mi · Small home$2,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
Where it is
- 4101 Fairway Drive, Soquel, CA 95073Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.
Opening the neighborhood map…
The state record
California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.
Since 2022, the state has filed 8 documents for this home, and its records count 8 visits since 2024. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on April 13, 2026 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Unsubstantiated.”
- On file since
- 2022
- State visits
- 8
- Most recent visit
- April 13, 2026
- Occupied at that visit
- 11 of 26 bedsa count on that day, not an opening
We hold 3 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated February 29, 2024 to April 13, 2026. 3 of the 3 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Unsubstantiated” (3). 3 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 3 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.
Beside homes the same size
- Type A citations0typical 0
- Type B citations0typical 1
- Substantiated allegations0typical 2
- Total complaints3typical 6
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,354 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2024.
Year by year
The last 36 months — 7 of 8 documents
Apr 13, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff physically abused resident by forcing resident to shower
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Marcella Tarin conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver the findings of the above allegation. LPA met with Administrator (ADM) Myla Ilagan. LPA stated the purpose of the visit. On 3/18/2026 the Department received a complaint with the above allegation. On 3/19/2026 the Department interviewed the Reporting Party (RP). RP states a resident, referred to as R1, was ‘accosted’ by two staff members on 3/5/2026 by Staff S1 and Staff S2. RP states R1 was going to his/her room to change due to having a ‘bladder problem.’ RP states S1 and S2 grabbed R1 and ‘dragged’ R1 into the shower. Page 1 of 3 Unsubstantiated On 3/25/2026 the Department conducted a complaint visit and interviewed the Licensee Rachelle Recinto, 3 Staff (S1 to S3) and 1 Resident (R1). Licensee stated there was an incident on 3/5/2026 with R1, when R1 was observed to be soiled in the dining area. Licensee stated R1 was offered help with a shower, to which R1 agreed to let staff help him/her with a shower. Licensee stated R1 walked with S1 and S2 to the shower. Licensee stated she then heard screaming and went to check on R1. Licensee stated she stood at the bathroom shower doorway and saw that R1 was being showered. Licensee stated S2 told her that R1 did not want to shower anymore. Licensee stated she could not leave R1 in the shower, due to safety concerns of the floor being wet and R1 is a fall risk. Licensee stated S1 and S2 helped R1 out of the shower and S1 and S2 were told to leave R1 alone. Licensee stated that she and the facility staff “try so hard to help” R1 with bathing, toileting and dressing as part of R1’s care plan. Licensee stated R1 does not allow staff to help him/her with bathing, toileting and dressing. Licensee stated staff are scared of R1 because R1 will scream, yell, and make offensive statements to staff. Licensee stated R1 walks around the facility with soiled briefs/clothing and refuses to change. Licensee stated this is an ongoing hygiene concern and R1’s care team is aware of R1’s hygiene and refusal of care since 2025. On 3/25/2026 the Department interviewed 3 Staff (S1 to S3). 3 Out of 3 staff state he/she is not aware of any incident where staff physically abused a resident by forcing the resident to shower. S1 stated on 3/5/2026 he/she was asked by the Licensee to help R1 to shower because R1 was soiled. S1 stated R1 agreed to let staff him/her. S1 stated S2 also helped R1 during this incident. S2 stated he/she was asked by Licensee to help R1 with a shower. S2 stated R1 agreed to let staff help him/her with a shower. S2 stated S1 helped bathe R1. S2 stated R1 then said he/she did not want to shower anymore. S2 stated R1 let S1 help him/her to get out of the shower and to put his/her clothes on. On 3/25/2026 the Department interviewed Resident R1. R1 stated on 3/5/2026, he/she was dragged into the shower by two staff, S1 and S2. R1 stated he/she did not agree to staff helping him/her with a shower. R1 stated he/she did not ask for staff to help him/her. R1 stated he/she does not need help with bathing/showering. Page 2 of 3 On 4/1/2026 the Department interviewed Witness 1 (W1). W1 stated he/she is aware of R1’s refusal of care by facility staff since 2025. W1 stated R1’s hygiene is an ongoing concern. W1 stated R1 is known to have behaviors of saying staff force him/her to bathe/shower when R1 is soiled. W1 stated R1 refuses medical and psychiatric care, calling doctors and psychiatrists ‘liars.’ W1 stated R1 is not receptive to care due to R1 having mental health impairments. Review of R1’s physician’s report dated 1/27/2026, R1 diagnoses are mild cognitive impairment, with development of major neurocognitive impairment. R1’s physical health status is listed as having bladder incontinence, difficulty with balance and requiring assistance with repositioning and transferring. R1’s capacity for self care is listed as able to bathe, dress/groom, and care for own toileting needs. Review of R1’s Needs and Services plan dated 2/16/2026, R1’s mental status notes R1 refusal to shower, aggressive toward staff, with staff offering to help with personal hygiene. R1’s Physical Health, R1 refuses showers and help with changing, staff are to offer help daily to shower and remind to change briefs/diapers. Review of Santa Cruz County Sheriff’s Office Daily Press Log from 3/1/2026 to 3/15/2026 notes an incident on 3/5/2026 at approximately 3:00PM. Review of the sheriff’s report noted R1 was interviewed and it was determined that no crime had been committed, and no injuries were observed. No additional follow up was conducted by the sheriff’s department. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is no preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation(s) did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. No deficiencies were cited during today’s visit, per California Code of Regulations, Title 22. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator (ADM) Myla Ilagan and a copy of this report was provided. Page 3 of 3 END OF REPORTthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 13, 2026 · control 26-AS-20260318100030
Feb 25, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not prevent residents from eloping from the facility
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Marcella Tarin conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver the findings of the above allegation. LPA met with Staff S1 Rosa Robledo. LPA stated the purpose of the visit. S1 informed Licensee Rachelle Recinto via phone of the visit. Licensee authorized S1 to sign on her behalf. On 2/4/2026 the Department received a complaint with the above allegation. On 2/4/2026 the Department interviewed the Reporting Party (RP). RP states he/she observed on ‘five occasions’ where residents have ‘gotten out’ of the facility, onto the street. RP states within the past couple of weeks, he/she helped a female resident who had fallen on the street in front of the facility. Page 1 of 2 Unsubstantiated RP states he/she helped the female resident back to the facility and a staff member was present. RP states he/she did not remember the name of the resident, or staff involved. RP was unable to provide additional information regarding this incident. On 2/4/2026, the Department conducted a complaint investigation visit and interviewed the Licensee, 3 Staff (S1 to S3), 1 Resident (R1) and 1 Witness (W1). Licensee states she is not aware of any residents exiting the facility onto to the street at any time. 3 Out of 3 staff state he/she is not aware of any residents exiting the facility onto the street at any time. On 2/4/2026, the Department interviewed 1 Resident (R1). R1 states he/she has never exited the facility front gate to the street. On 2/25/2026, the Department interviewed Resident R2. R2 states he/she has never seen a resident outside of the facility front gate on the street. On 2/4/2026 the Department interviewed Witness 1 (W1). W1 states he/she has observed residents exit out the facility gate and saw a resident walking up and down the street. W1 did not provide additional information regarding this incident. On 2/5/2026 the Department reviewed Incident Report submitted to the Department from July 2025 to February 4, 2026, no incidents of reported elopements (residents exiting the facility front gate onto the street) were noted. On 2/5/2026 the Department reviewed Santa Cruz County Sheriff’s Office Daily Press Log report from 1/16/2026 to 1/31/2026 with no reported incidents for the facility address. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is no preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. No deficiencies were cited during today's visit per California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted with S1 Rosa Robledo and a copy of this report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 25, 2026 · control 26-AS-20260204090906
Jan 21, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
On 1/21/2026 LPA Grace Donato made an unannounced annual visit to the facility. LPA met with Administrator Myla Ilagan. LPA explained the purpose of the visit. LPA toured the facility inside and outside including random resident rooms and kitchen area. LPA observed residents resting in their bedrooms and other residents watching TV in the living room. While touring the facility it was observed that the room temperature was at 70 deg F. Hot water was also tested in the bathrooms and the temperature was 108 deg F. All bathrooms have bath mats. The facility is observed to be clean, odorless, and well maintained. Residents bedrooms were observed to be well organized and fully furnished with adequate lighting. Food supply in kitchen was observed with an adequate two day perishable and seven day non-perishable. Carbon monoxide/ smoke detectors, sprinklers, and fire extinguisher were present throughout the facility. Emergency drills are done every quarter. Five resident records and five staff records were reviewed. Staff have criminal record and fingerprint clearances on file. Staff have current First Aid/CPR certifications on file. Resident records were reviewed and were observed to be complete. Centrally stored medication was locked in 2 medicine carts and inaccessible by residents. All medication was labeled and sorted by resident name. All medication logs are complete and updated. No deficiencies being cited today. Report is reviewed and copy is provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 21, 2026
Mar 12, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Other
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Marcella Tarin arrived unannounced to conduct a Case Management-Other and met with Administrator Myla Ilagan. The purpose of this visit is to follow up on deficiencies that were issued during an Annual Inspection on 1/16/2025. LPA explained the purpose of the visit to ADM. LPA observed 18 clients and 6 staff at the facility. On 1/16/2025, LPA conducted an Annual Inspection visit. During review of resident records, LPA observed that R3 and R8's medical assessment's ambulatory status is non-ambulatory. R3 and R8 occupy ambulatory rooms. A deficiency was issued and a Plan of Correction (POC) was developed with the ADM. The ADM stated the facility would talk with the families of R3 and R8 about moving into the appropriate rooms based on their ambulatory status. LPA also issued a deficiency for 19 resident bathrooms that did not have slip-resistant mats. ADM stated the facility would purchase slip-resistant mats for 19 resident bathrooms as part of the POC. During today's visit, LPA inspected R3 and R8's room and observed R3 and R8 are still in ambulatory rooms. ADM stated she was still working with the families of R3 and R8 about moving rooms. LPA advised ADM to submit a fire clearance request to the Department by the end of visit today 3/12/2025. ADM submitted fire request to Department during visit. LPA inspected 19 resident bathrooms and observed a non-skid mat in each resident bathroom. LPA cleared the deficiencies cited on 1/16/2025 during today's visit. A Letter of Deficiency Citations Cleared was printed and provided to ADM during today's visit. No deficiencies were cited during today's visit per California Code of Regulations, Title 22. An exit interview was conducted with ADM Myla Ilagan and a copy of this report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 12, 2025
Jan 16, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Marcella Tarin conducted an unannounced annual inspection and met with Administrator (ADM) Myla Ilagan. LPA toured the interior and exterior of the facility with ADM to include the kitchen, office, resident rooms, dining room, bathrooms, back and front of the facility. The facility is a residential care home for the elderly, and consists of two large buildings, Wing A and Wing B. Facility thermostat temperature display was observed at 68 degrees F. All exit and passageways were free and clear of obstruction. At 9:50 AM LPA toured the Wing B of the facility. LPA observed the facility thermostat temperature display at 68 degrees F. LPA toured 8 resident rooms in Wing B. LPA observed 7 out of 8 resident rooms to have functioning lights, a bed, a dresser/table and storage space for personal belongings. LPA observed 7 out of 8 resident bathrooms had functioning lights, paper towels and hand soap. 7 out of 8 resident bathrooms had no slip-resistant mats on the bathroom floor. At 9:55AM, during tour of resident rooms, LPA observed a male staff member asleep in an unoccupied bedroom (#18). ADM stated the staff member would be leaving and had worked the overnight shift. LPA advised ADM that facility shall be large enough to provide comfortable living accommodations and privacy to staff members who may reside in the facility. At 10:15AM LPA toured the Wing A of the facility. LPA toured 13 resident rooms in Wing A. 13 out of 13 resident rooms had functioning lights, a bed, a dresser/table and storage space for personal belongings. 7 out of 7 resident bathrooms have paper towels, hand soap and functioning lights. LPA measured hot water temperature with a range from 105 to 112.2 degree F in resident bathrooms. See LIC809C At 10:30AM, LPA toured resident room #1 and bathroom #1 (unoccupied), and observed the room was converted to storage space. LPA advised ADM to submit an updated facility sketch to include the converted bedroom #1 and bathroom #1 to storage space. LPA also observed 6 out of 7 resident bathrooms did not have slip-resistant mats on the floor. At 10:45AM LPA toured the kitchen area and observed a perishable food supply of at least two days and a non-perishable food supply of at least seven days. LPA observed the medication storage area, knives storage area, and cleaning product storage area as locked and inaccessible to clients in care. The facility was equipped with smoke and carbon monoxide detectors. All smoke detectors functioned properly when tested by ADM. Fire extinguishers were last serviced on 10/31/2024. LPA reviewed the facility first aid kit, and it was observed to be complete. The facility emergency drill log was reviewed. The facility's last drill was on 11/24/24. LPA reviewed 8 resident records. 8 out of 8 resident records were found to be complete. Resident records included emergency contact information, physician’s report, appraisal/needs and service plans, and personal rights. During resident record review, LPA observed that R3 and R8's medical assessment's ambulatory status is non-ambulatory. R3 and R8 occupy ambulatory rooms. LPA advised ADM to partner with the families of R3 and R8 to move residents to non-ambulatory rooms. LPA reviewed 8 resident’s Centrally Stored Medication and Destruction Records (CSMDR’s). 8 out of 8 CSMDR’s were observed to be complete with all medication documented. LPAs reviewed 7 staff records. 7 out of 7 staff records were found to be complete. Staff records included fingerprint background clearance, medical assessment with TB result, personnel record and staff training. LPA observed that 5 staff were not associated to the facility, but had obtained fingerprint background clearance. LPA advised ADM to associate staff to the facility by 1/17/2025. Deficiencies were cited during today’s visit per California Code of Regulations Title 22. See LIC809-D. A Technical Violation was also issued. See LIC9102 for more information. An exit interview was conducted with ADM Myla Ilagan. A signed copy of this report and appeal rights were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 16, 2025
Feb 29, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility is in disrepair
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) David Marrufo conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit and met with Administrator Myla Ilagan. On 02/20/2024, the Department received a complaint with the above allegation. The Department received two photographs from a witness showing a leak near a pipe on the outside area of the facility. During visit, LPA Marrufo observed two pipes, one black pipe along the wall on the exterior of the kitchen and another protruding from the ground. There was a puddle of water near the pipe on the ground that was about a foot long and 5 inches wide. LPA Marrufo observed a sandbag along the wall of an adjacent facility building and another two sandbags near the door of the same adjacent facility building. See LIC9099-C for more information. Page 1 of 3. Unsubstantiated During visit, LPA Marrufo obtained a copy of an invoice from a plumbing company. The invoice is dated 12/27/2023. The Invoice states it is for labor and the installation of a pipe. The Invoice describes the work as “*ran snake cleaned kitchen drain, ran snake cleared tub pulled out hairs, raised up kitchen vent and put in line vent@ 4101 fairway dr.” During interview, Administrator Myla Ilagan stated that water from the kitchen sink sometime overflows and pours from the pipe along the exterior wall. Then, the water will pour onto the ground. Administrator stated that she recalls that the plumbing company installed the black pipe along the exterior of the kitchen wall. Administrator stated to have notified the plumbing contractor afterwards via telephone that the pipe is still leaking, and the plumbing contractor visited the facility again briefly and stated that they needed to order more parts to fix the leak. Administrator stated the plumbing company did not leave any documentation of the last visit. LPA Marrufo conducted a telephone interview with Plumbing Company Staff PC1, who stated that the plumbing company installed the longer black pipe on the exterior kitchen wall on 12/27/2023. PC1 stated to not have any documentation on a shorter pipe that the company had previously installed. PC1 stated to not have any documentation of a visit in which a plumbing contractor visited the facility and stated to need to order additional parts. During visit, LPA Marrufo interviewed staff S1, who is a maintenance staff at the facility. S1 stated to have observed the leak occurring outside of the facility. S1 stated that the leak has been reoccurring. S1 stated that a plumbing company came to fix the leak “about a month ago.” Page 2 of 3. During visit, LPA Marrufo interviewed staff S2, who stated that the leaks have only occurred from the pipe along the exterior of the kitchen wall and not from the pipe from the ground outside of the facility. S2 stated that a plumbing contractor came to the facility and installed a short pipe along the kitchen exterior wall, but the short pipe still leaked when the kitchen sink overflowed. S2 stated the plumbing contractor visited again and installed the longer black pipe that is currently installed along the exterior of the kitchen wall. S2 stated the plumbing contractor instructed staff to remove the cap on the top of the black pipe to allow air to flow and push water down if the pipe is overflowing. Based on information from interviews conducted with staff, and records reviewed, and observations made, although the allegation listed above may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. Therefore, the allegation is unsubstantiated. No Deficiencies cited under California Code of Regulations Title 22 LPA Marrufo requests an Action Plan by the facility which discusses how the facility plans to ensure that the leak outside of the facility kitchen will be fixed and how the facility will ensure the residents remain safe from the leak while repairs are ongoing. LPA Marrufo requests that the Action Plan be submitted within 7 days. This report was reviewed with Myla Ilagan and a copy of this report was provided. Page 3 of 3. END REPORTthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 29, 2024 · control 26-AS-20240220080053
Dec 13, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Prelicensing
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Steve Chang and Mita Partoza conducted an unannounced pre licensing inspection, and met with administrator (ADM) Myla Ilagan. LPAs observed 17 residents and 7 staff at facility. LPAs toured the facility with ADM inside and out. LPA inspected living room, dinning rooms, kitchen. There are 3 common restrooms, staff live-in room, 19 resident rooms in facility. Some bathrooms were observed without non skid pads. ADM stated the facility will put the non skid pad in the bathrooms. Two days perishable foods and seven days non perishable foods were observed sufficient. Room temperature was observed at 71 degree F, hot water temperature was observed at 109 degree F. Temperature of refrigerator was measured at 40 degree F, and temperature of freezer was observed at 0 degree F. Medication cabinet, and cleaning products closet were observed locked. Knives cabinet was observed unlocked. ADM stated the facility will fix this issue. 3 window screens were observed not in good repair. ADM stated the facility will fix this issue.s Fire extinguisher was serviced on 7/5/2023. The facility is equipped with fire alarm and carbon monoxide detectors. Smoke detector alarm system were tested, and were working fine. First Aide Box was observed in the facility. Night lights was not observed in the hallway. ADM stated the facility will put the night light at the hallway. Front yard and backyard were inspected. There was no obstruction to block the walkways.Facility last fire and emergency drill was conducted on 12/08/2023. Component III was conducted with ADM. No citation was issued today. Exit interview was conducted with ADM. This report was provided to ADM for signature. A copy of this report was provided to ADM.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 13, 2023
What the state’s words mean
CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗
Life here
Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.
The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.
Before you call
Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.
- What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
- Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
- Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
- What could change whether someone can stay here?
- Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?
Other homes nearby
The nearest licensed homes in Santa Cruz County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.
Seaview Guest Home
Aptos · Small home · 2.0 mi away
$4,800 a month to start · Listed by the home
Aegis Assisted Living of Aptos
Aptos · Large community · 2.1 mi away
$6,030 a month to start · Listed by the home
Valley Haven III
Santa Cruz · Mid-size home · 2.1 mi away
$3,500 a month to start · Listed by the home
Dominican Oaks
Santa Cruz · Large community · 2.2 mi away
$4,890 a month to start · Listed by the home
Paradise Assisted Care
Santa Cruz · Mid-size home · 2.2 mi away
$3,800 a month to start · Listed by the home
Live in Serenity
Santa Cruz · Mid-size home · 2.7 mi away
$4,300 a month to start · Covelight estimate