This licence is listed as closed. The state lists it as “Closed, Change of Ownership”, September 27, 2026.

The state also lists Antioch Summitcare Home at this address under another licence.

Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

A Loving Home

Small home·6 while this license was open·Antioch, California

Closed in state recordLicence #79201256
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Dementia · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · September 27, 2026
  • Home size6 while this license was openSmall care home · the state license record
  • Room at the last state visit3 of 6 beds occupiedApril 29, 2026 · not a current opening

A Loving Home in Antioch held a license for a small care home — a residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE). The license covered 6 residents, first issued in 2023. The state lists this licence as “Closed, Change of Ownership.”

Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about A Loving Home

Is A Loving Home licensed?

The state lists this license as “Closed, Change of Ownership,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

How many residents is A Loving Home licensed for?

6 residents while this license was open — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Has A Loving Home been cited?

1 Type A and 6 Type B citations since 2023, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 14 state visits over the same years.

Is A Loving Home still open?

This license is listed as closed, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The state also lists Antioch Summitcare Home at this address under another license.

What does A Loving Home cost?

This license is listed as closed, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Among 33 other homes of a similar licensed size across Contra Costa County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,500 to $5,825 a month, and the middle figure is $4,500 (n = 33 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does A Loving Home take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this license is listed as closed. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license was held by A & D Homecare LLC, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. See the homes licensed to A & D Homecare LLC — at least 2 on the state roster.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Sutter Delta Medical Center is 0.5 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can A Loving Home keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is on this closed license’s record, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

A Loving Home license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “A LOVING HOME”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #79201256. The state lists this license as “Closed, Change of Ownership,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • This license covered 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • This license was held by A & D Homecare LLC, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2023, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 14 state inspection visits since 2023, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 1 Type A and 6 Type B citations on file since 2023, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 14 state visits in that period.
  • 4 complaints and 7 substantiated allegations on file since 2023, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is April 29, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 6 residents
  • Dementia / memory careApproved by the state
  • Hospice careApproved · covers up to 2 residents
  • BedriddenApproved · covers up to 1 resident

State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 6 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 1 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. APPROVED HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 2. BEDRIDDEN CLIENT ONLY ALLOWED TO RESIDE IN BEDROOM #3. NO CLIENTS CAN RESIDE IN THE GARAGE. ALLOWED TO RESIDE IN BEDROOM #3. NO CLIENTS CAN RESIDE IN THE GARAGE.

983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA

CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 2 — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation on file

    Ask: “Can we read the dementia care disclosure and discuss how daily support works?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

3 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$5,250a month to start

Likely $4,300–$6,500

From 24 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$5,250a month

Likely $4,300–$6,650

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room
  • Starting monthly rate$5,250likely $4,300–$6,500

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 24 small homes and similar homes within 15 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $4,300–$6,650
$5,250
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $5,000–$9,700
$7,250
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis license is listed as closed. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 24 small homes and similar homes within 15 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

24 homes like this within 15 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,000–$5,000.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 24 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 3420 Clayburn Rd., Antioch, CA 94509Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2023, the state has filed 10 documents for this home, and its records count 14 visits since 2023. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated April 29, 2026.

On file since
2023
State visits
14
Most recent visit
April 29, 2026
Occupied at that visit
3 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 4 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated June 13, 2025 to April 29, 2026. 4 of the 4 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (3), “Unsubstantiated” (1). 4 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 4 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations1typical 0
  • Type B citations6typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations7typical 0
  • Total complaints4typical 0

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2023.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated2026132202533120241102023230

The last 36 months — 7 of 10 documents

20261 state visit · 3 documents
Apr 29, 2026Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not prevent a resident from developing pressure injuries while in care Staff did not administer medication as prescribed Staff did not clean resident’s bedding Staff did not keep facility clear of vermin

On 04/29/26 at 4:10PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) D Panlilio conducted a subsequent visit and met with administrator (ADM) to deliver the findings of above allegations. LPA explained the purpose of the visit with ADM. During investigation, LPA obtained the following documents from administrator – Personnel record (LIC500), Residents roster, Admission agreements, Physician’s reports, Needs & Services plans, Hospice care plan, Centrally stored medication logs, After visit discharge reports, incident reports. Health & safety check conducted on 01/28/26 (see LIC 809 dated 01/28/26). Continued on next page, LIC 9099-C Substantiated Allegation: Staff did not prevent a resident from developing pressure injuries while in care Investigation Finding: Substantiated During investigation, the Department conducted interviews of facility staff (ADM, S1, S2) & R1’s responsible party (POA), witness (W1) and reviewed resident (R1) documents. Review of R1’s admission agreement showed he was first admitted at the facility on 06/16/23 and resided at the facility until 01/28/26. R1 was assessed with mild cognitive impairment, non-ambulatory, needs assistance transferring in & out of bed and did not have a history of skin breakdown as shown on R1’s physician’s report dated 06/07/23. On 01/15/26, R1 was admitted into hospice care and diagnosed with a total of 5 pressure injuries on his back (three stage 2 pressure injuries), left buttock (one stage 2 pressure injury) and sacrum (one stage 3 pressure injury) and a tumor wound. On 01/27/26, responsible party (POA) removed R1 from the facility due to unsanitary conditions. W1 visited R1 at POA’s home and observed five pressure injuries on R1. Based on the Department’s observations and interviews which were conducted and record review(s), the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation(s) that staff did not prevent a resident from developing pressure injuries while in care was found to be substantiated. Immediate civil penalty of $500 assessed during visit for staff failing to prevent resident from developing multiple pressure injuries while in care. Additional civil penalty related to serious bodily injury is pending review. Allegation: Staff did not administer medication as prescribed Investigation Finding: Substantiated During investigation, the Department conducted interviews of facility staff & responsible parties and reviewed resident (R1) documents. Staff confirmed with LPA that they were giving a topical medication orally to R1 by placing the powder inside water and giving it for him to drink until hospice nurse pointed out this error. Review of R1’s hospice care orders dated 01/20/26 showed topical powder was to be applied to R1’s right ear tumor wound 2X per week. Based on the Department’s observations and interviews which were conducted and record review(s), the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation(s) that staff did not administer medications as prescribed was found to be substantiated. Continued on next page, LIC 9099-C pg 1 Allegation: Staff did not clean resident’s bedding Investigation Finding: Substantiated During investigation, the Department conducted interviews of facility staff & responsible parties and reviewed resident (R1) documents. POA stated during her visits at the facility that R1’s neck pillow was caked with drainage from R1’s right ear and had a strong odor. POA also stated that the pillow was not being washed and family was not notified of need for more pillows to allow washing between uses. Staff (S1, S2) confirmed with LPA that they did not wash the neck pillow used to support R1’ infected ear while in care. Based on the Department’s observations and interviews which were conducted and record review(s), the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation(s) that staff did not clean resident’s bedding was found to be substantiated. Allegation: Staff did not keep facility clear of vermin Investigation Finding: Substantiated During investigation, the Department conducted interviews of facility staff & responsible party (POA) and reviewed resident (R1) documents. On 01/28/26, LPAs D Panlilio and K Nguyen observed during visit the presence of rodent droppings in resident’s drawers, clothes, closet and personal hygiene items at the facility. POA stated they left R1’s personal items at the facility when they removed him on 01/26/26 because all his personal belongings were contaminated with vermin droppings. Based on the Department’s observations and interviews which were conducted and record review(s), the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation(s) that staff did not keep facility clear of vermin was found to be substantiated. Deficiencies are cited per Title 22 California Code of Regulations and listed on LIC9099D. Failure to submit proof of corrections (POC) by plan of correction due dates and/or any repeat deficiencies within a 12-month period may result in civil penalties. Exit interview conducted, appeal rights and copy of report provided. Allegation: Staff left a resident in a soiled diaper for a long period of time Investigation Finding: Unsubstantiated During investigation, the Department conducted interviews of facility staff (ADM, S1, S2), residents (R2, R3), R1’s responsible party (POA), and reviewed resident (R1) documents. Staff stated that they cleaned and changed all residents’ soiled diapers in the AM before breakfast, checked/changed their diapers as needed before lunch and changed their diapers again before bedtime. S1 stated that he changed R1’s soiled diaper in the AM on 01/20/26. However, R1 had another bowel movement before the hospice nurse arrived in the PM. LPA interviewed other non-ambulatory residents (R2, R3) who stated that staff changed their diapers 3 times a day or as needed. Although the allegation may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. Therefore, the allegation that staff left a resident in a soiled diaper for a long period of time was found to be unsubstantiated. Allegation: Staff did not maintain a comfortable temperature for a resident in care. Investigation Finding: Unsubstantiated During investigation, the Department conducted interviews of facility staff (ADM, S1, S2), responsible parties (POAs) and reviewed resident (R1) documents. RP stated that R1’s bedroom was cold due to staff leaving the window open. During unannounced visits on 06/13/25, 08/12/25 and 01/28/26, LPA inspected the facility and observed residents’ bedrooms, bathrooms, kitchen, dining room and living room areas had a comfortable temperature with thermostat reading at 70 deg F. LPA did not observe any open windows in residents’ bedrooms during visit. Although the allegation may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. Therefore, the allegation that staff did not maintain a comfortable temperature for a resident in care is unsubstantiated. Allegation: Staff left resident in the same clothing for a long period of time Investigation Finding: Unsubstantiated During investigation, the Department conducted interviews of facility staff (ADM, S1, S2), responsible party (POA) and reviewed resident (R1) documents. RP stated that during multiple visits with R1 at the facility, they observed R1 wearing the same clothes for a long period of time. Staff (S1) stated they assisted R1 with his activities of daily living such as bathing, dressing, grooming and would change his clothes after a bath or if soiled from bowel movements/urination. Although the allegation may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. Therefore, the allegation that staff left resident in the same clothing for a long period of time is unsubstantiated. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 29, 2026 · control 15-AS-20260128102015

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: HSC 1569.269 · Plan of correction due date: Apr 29, 2026

Enumerated rights; severability (a) Residents of residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following rights: (10) To be free from neglect . . . This requirement was not met as evidenced by staff failing to provide adequate care & supervision resulting in resident developing multiple pressure injuries which posed an immediate health & safety risk to residents in carethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 29, 2026

Plan of correction: Immediate civil penalty of $500 assessed during visit for staff neglect and supervision which resulted in resident developing five pressure injuries while in care. Additional civil penalty related to serious bodily injury is pending review. NCC to be scheduled at a later date.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87633(d) · Plan of correction due date: May 27, 2026

The licensee shall ensure that the hospice care plan is current, accurately matches the services actually being provided, and that the client’s care needs are being met at all times This requirement was not met as evidenced by staff not administering medication as prescribed which posed a potential health and safety risk to resident in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 29, 2026

Plan of correction: By POC due date, ADM agrees to complete and submit to CCLD in-service staff retraining on proper hospice care plan implementation in compliance with Section 87633 regulations.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87468.2(a)(4) · Plan of correction due date: May 27, 2026

To care, supervision, and services that meet their individual needs and are delivered by staff that are sufficient in numbers, qualifications, and competency to meet their needs. This requirement was not met as evidenced by staff did not clean resident’s bedding which posed a potential health & safety risk to resident in carethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 29, 2026

Plan of correction: By POC due date, ADM agrees to complete and submit to CCLD in-service staff retraining on proper care and supervision of resident in compliance with Section 87468.2 regulations.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87468.1(2) · Plan of correction due date: May 27, 2026

To be accorded safe, healthful and comfortable accommodations, furnishings and equipment. This requirement was not met as evidenced by staff did not keep facility clear of vermin which posed a potential health & safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 29, 2026

Plan of correction: By POC due date, ADM agrees to complete and submit to CCLD in-service staff retraining on proper care and supervision of resident in compliance with Section 87468.1 regulations.

Apr 29, 2026Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not ensure residents’ living quarters are clean and sanitary Staff do not wash hands after handling mice feces

On 04/29/26 at 4PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) D Panlilio conducted a subsequent visit and met with administrator (ADM) to deliver the findings of above allegations. LPA explained the purpose of the visit with ADM. During investigation, LPA obtained the following documents from administrator – Personnel record (LIC500), Residents roster, Admission agreements, Physician’s reports, Needs & Services plans, Hospice care plan, Centrally stored medication logs, After visit discharge reports, incident reports. Continued on next page. LIC 9099-C Substantiated Allegation: Staff do not ensure residents’ living quarters are clean and sanitary Investigation Finding: Substantiated During investigation, the Department conducted interviews of facility staff, responsible party (POA) and reviewed resident (R1) documents. On 01/28/26, LPAs D Panlilio and K Nguyen inspected the facility and observed the presence of a dead cockroach in Rm#1 and presence of rodent droppings in Rm#2. RP shared photos of rodent droppings in resident’s (R1) drawers, clothes, closet and personal hygiene items at the facility dated 1/26/26. Based on the Department’s observations and interviews which were conducted and record review(s), the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation(s) that staff do not ensure residents’ living quarters are clean and sanitary was found to be substantiated. Allegation: Staff do not wash hands after handling mice feces Investigation Finding: Substantiated During investigation, the Department conducted interviews of facility staff & responsible party (POA) and reviewed resident (R1) documents. POA stated that on 01/27/26, she observed staff tried to give R1 his medication and clean the open wound on his right ear without washing their hands after cleaning the closet contaminated with mice feces. Staff (S2) confirmed with LPA that they did not wash their hands when they tried to apply the medication on R1’s open wound. Based on the Department’s observations and interviews which were conducted and record review(s), the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation(s) that staff do not wash hands after handling mice feces was found to be substantiated. Deficiencies are cited per Title 22 California Code of Regulations and listed on LIC9099D. Failure to submit proof of corrections (POC) by plan of correction due dates and/or any repeat deficiencies within a 12-month period may result in civil penalties. Exit interview conducted, appeal rights and copy of report provided. Allegation: Staff handled resident in a rough manner Investigation Finding: Unsubstantiated During investigation, the Department conducted interviews of facility staff (ADM, S1), R2’s responsible party (POA) and reviewed R2’s documents. RP stated that she witnessed staff handle R2 in a rough manner when placing him in his bed or on his chair. Review of R2’s admission agreement showed he was first admitted at the facility on 09/30/23. Staff denied handling R2 in a rough manner and stated that they assisted R2 with his activities of daily living such as bathing, toileting, diaper changes, dressing, grooming, transfer to and from the bed, meals and medications. On 01/30/26, POA confirmed with LPA that staff provided R2 with proper care and supervision while residing at the facility. Although the allegation may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. Therefore, the allegation that staff handled resident in a rough manner was found to be unsubstantiated. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 29, 2026 · control 15-AS-20260129080923

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87303(a) · Plan of correction due date: Apr 29, 2026

The facility shall be clean, safe, sanitary and in good repair at all times. Maintenance shall include provision of maintenance services and procedures for the safety and well-being of residents, employees and visitors. This requirement was not met as evidenced by staff did not ensure residents’ living quarters are clean and sanitary which posed a potential health and safety risk to resident in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 29, 2026

Plan of correction: Deficiency corrected during visit. ADM hired a professional exterminator company on 01/28/26 and resolved vermin infestation. Staff also cleaned and sanitized all bedrooms, bathrooms, kitchen, dining and common areas on 01/28/26.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87470(a)(1)(A) · Plan of correction due date: May 27, 2026

All staff and volunteers shall perform hand hygiene. (A) Hand hygiene shall include hand washing with soap and water or using an alcohol-based sanitizer or any other sanitizing method recommended by a medical professional, local health official, health department, or other research-based medical authority. This requirement was not met as evidenced by staff did not wash hands after handling mice feces which posed a potential health & safety risk to resident in carethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 29, 2026

Plan of correction: By POC due date, ADM agrees to complete and submit to CCLD in-service staff retraining on infection control requirements in compliance with Section 87470 regulations.

Apr 29, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 04/29/26 at 5:52PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) D Panlilio arrived unannounced to conduct an annual required inspection. LPA met with administrator (ADM) and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA observed current administrator certificate# 7029691740 which expires 01/19/2027. At 6:15PM, LPA toured the facility including but not limited to the front entrance, screening station, kitchen, bathrooms, bedrooms and common areas. There is one central entry point for universal screening for staff, residents and visitors. A sign-in policy, visitor’s logs, no touch thermometer, additional face masks and hand sanitizers were observed at the screening station. Emergency Disaster Plan, Complaint poster, Personal rights, Cough/sneeze etiquette, proper hand-washing signs were observed posted in common areas. Facility has a sufficient 2-day perishable and 7-day non-perishable food supply. Facility has a 30-day supply of PPEs, paper, medications locked in cabinets. Comfortable temperature is maintained at 70 deg F. Hot water temperature was measured at 115 deg F. Facility has a mitigation plan in place and the infection control leader is the administrator. Inside and outside pathways were free of obstruction and fire hazards. Smoke and Carbon monoxide detectors were operational. Fire extinguisher was observed fully charged and last inspected on 02/09/26. LPA reviewed 2 staff and 3 resident files. Updated copies of the following documents were collected for facility file:  LIC500- Personnel Report  Residents Roster  LIC308- Designation of Facility Responsibility  LIC610E- Emergency/Disaster Plan including infection control plans  Evidence of Liability Insurance No deficiencies cited during visit. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 29, 2026
20253 state visits · 3 documents
Aug 12, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are not meeting residents nutritional needs

On 08/12/25 at 3PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) D Panlilio conducted an unannounced complaint visit, met with administrator (ADM), gathered information and delivered investigation findings of above allegations. LPA explained the purpose of the visit with ADM. During investigation, LPA obtained the following documents from ADM - staff roster, residents’ roster, admission agreement, physicians report, ID/Emergency information, Needs & Services plan, meal plans and maintenance records. Continued on next page, LIC 9099-C Unsubstantiated Allegation: Staff are not meeting resident’s nutritional needs Investigation Finding: Unsubstantiated On 08/12/25 at 1PM, LPA interviewed staff (ADM, S1) and residents (R1, R2, R3). ADM stated staff follows prescribed special diet requirements for residents. S1 stated he prepares low carbohydrate and gluten free meals for R1, meals rich in protein for R2 since he is on dialysis and soft minced diet for R3 since he has no upper and lower teeth. R1, R2, R3 confirmed with LPA that staff provide them 3 meals each day with snacks and drinks in between meals. LPA observed facility has sufficient 2-day perishables (fresh fruits, vegetables, eggs, milk, juices, gluten free bread, pies, various meats) and 7-day non-perishable food supply. LPA observed residents are hydrated, well nourished, odor free, and comfortable in their surroundings. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did occur, therefore the allegation that staff are not meeting resident’s nutritional needs is unsubstantiated. No deficiency cited during visit. Exit interview conducted and a copy of the report provided. Allegation: Facility outlets are in disrepair with exposed wires Investigation Finding: Unfounded During investigation, LPA toured the facility including but not limited to residents’ bedrooms, bathrooms, kitchen, dining and living room areas. LPA did not observe any exposed wires present at the facility on 08/12/25. LPA also reviewed prior Complaint 15- AS-20250605113309 dated 06/13/25 which showed facility replaced all ungrounded electrical outlets with three prong grounded outlets inside the home (all resident's bedrooms, bathrooms, hallways, dining and kitchen areas) on 06/14/25. On LPA’s prior unannounced visit dated 06/13/25. LPA observed resident (R1) had several devices (medical monitoring device, TV, phone charger) plugged into a surge protector strip which is connected to the wall outlet. LPA did not observe any exposed wires from the electrical outlets. The Department had investigated the complaint alleging that facility outlets are in disrepair with exposed wires. We have found that the complaint was unfounded, meaning that the allegation was false, could not have happened and/or is without reasonable basis. We have therefore dismissed the complaint. No deficiencies cited. Exit Interview conducted and a copy of this report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 12, 2025 · control 15-AS-20250811112107
Jun 13, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff modified the resident's medical device without authorization

On 06/13/25 at 1PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) D Panlilio conducted an unannounced complaint visit, met with administrator (ADM), gathered information and delivered investigation findings of above allegations. LPA explained the purpose of the visit with ADM. During investigation, LPA interviewed residents (R1, R2, R3) & staff (ADM, S1), toured the facility with S1 and obtained the following documents from ADM - staff roster, residents’ roster, admission agreement, physicians report, ID/Emergency information, Needs & Services plan and incident reports. Continued on next page, LIC 9099_C Substantiated Allegation: Staff modified the resident’s medical device without authorization Investigation Finding: Substantiated During investigation, the department conducted interviews of residents (R1, R2, R3), facility staff (ADM, S1) & R1’s responsible party (POA) and reviewed resident's(R1) documents. ADM confirmed with LPA that R1's medical device was modified without her authorization to enable them to plug her medical device into the existing 2 prong ungrounded bedroom outlet. LPA observed all residents' bedroom outlets(Rms 1, 2, 3) had two prong ungrounded outlets. LPA observed only the kitchen area had grounded three prong electrical outlets. Based on the department’s observations and interviews which were conducted and record review(s), the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation(s) that staff modified the resident's medical device without authorization was found to be substantiated. Deficiency is cited per Title 22 California Code of Regulations and listed on LIC9099-D. Failure to submit proof of corrections (POC) by plan of correction due dates and/or any repeat deficiencies within a 12-month period may result in civil penalties. Exit interview conducted, appeal rights and copy of report provided. Allegation: Staff do not ensure residents receive bathing services in a timely manner Investigation Finding: Unsubstantiated During investigation, LPA interviewed staff (ADM, S1) and residents (R1, R2, R3). Residents (R1, R2, R3) confirmed with LPA that staff give them daily bed baths. R1 stated staff gives her a full shower every 7 days aside from getting bed baths. Staff confirmed with LPA that all non-ambulatory residents are given bed baths daily with R1 being given a full shower every Thursday. Staff denied not giving R1 a full bath over 13 days. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did occur, therefore the allegation that staff do not ensure residents receive bathing services in a timely manner is unsubstantiated. Exit interview conducted and a copy of the report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 13, 2025 · control 15-AS-20250605113309

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87203 · Plan of correction due date: Jun 25, 2025

All facilities shall be maintained in conformity with the regulations adopted by the State Fire Marshal for the protection of life and property against fire and panic This requirement was not met as evidenced by staff modified resident's medical device without authorization which posed a potential health & safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 13, 2025

Plan of correction: By POC due date, ADM agreed to replace all ungrounded outlets with three prong grounded outlets and submit photo of receipt for repairs in compliance with Section 87203 regulations.

Mar 12, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 03/12/25 at 1:50PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) D Panlilio arrived unannounced to conduct an annual required inspection. LPA met with administrator (ADM) and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA observed current administrator certificate# 6063977740 which expires 10/16/24. At 2PM, LPA toured the facility including but not limited to the front entrance, screening station, kitchen, bathrooms, bedrooms and common areas. There is one central entry point for universal screening for staff, residents and visitors. A sign-in policy, visitor’s logs, no touch thermometer, additional face masks and hand sanitizers were observed at the screening station. Emergency Disaster Plan, Complaint poster, Personal rights, Cough/sneeze etiquette, proper hand-washing signs were observed posted in common areas. Facility has a sufficient 2-day perishable and 7-day non-perishable food supply. Facility has a 30-day supply of PPEs, paper, medications locked in cabinets. Comfortable temperature is maintained at 72 deg F. Hot water temperature was measured at 113 deg F. Facility has a mitigation plan in place and the infection control leader is the administrator. Inside and outside pathways were free of obstruction and fire hazards. Smoke and Carbon monoxide detectors were operational. LPA reviewed 3 staff and 4 resident files. Updated copies of the following documents were collected for facility file:  LIC500- Personnel Report  Residents Roster  LIC308- Designation of Facility Responsibility  LIC610E- Emergency/Disaster Plan including infection control plans  Evidence of Liability Insurance No deficiencies cited during visit. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 12, 2025
20241 state visit · 1 document
Apr 25, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 04/25/24 at 12PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) D Panlilio arrived unannounced to conduct an annual required inspection. LPA met with administrator (ADM) and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA observed current administrator certificate# 6063977740 which expires 10/16/24. At 12:15PM, LPA toured the facility including but not limited to the front entrance, screening station, kitchen, bathrooms, bedrooms and common areas. There is one central entry point for universal screening for staff, residents and visitors. A sign-in policy, visitor’s logs, no touch thermometer, additional face masks and hand sanitizers were observed at the screening station. Emergency Disaster Plan, Complaint poster, Personal rights, Cough/sneeze etiquette, proper hand-washing signs were observed posted in common areas. Facility has a sufficient 2-day perishable and 7-day non-perishable food supply. Facility has a 30-day supply of PPEs, paper, medications locked in cabinets. Comfortable temperature is maintained at 70 deg F. Hot water temperature was measured at 116 deg F. Facility has a mitigation plan in place and the infection control leader is the administrator. Inside and outside pathways were free of obstruction and fire hazards. Smoke and Carbon monoxide detectors were operational. LPA reviewed 3 staff and 5 resident files. LPA also conducted 2 staff and 2 resident interviews during visit. Updated copies of the following documents were collected for facility file:  LIC500- Personnel Report  Residents Roster  LIC308- Designation of Facility Responsibility  LIC610E- Emergency/Disaster Plan including infection control plans  Evidence of Liability Insurance No deficiencies observed during visit. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 25, 2024
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Other homes nearby

Licensed homes in Contra Costa County near this one, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Contra Costa County