Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Smg Residential Care

Small home·Licensed for 6·Antioch, California

Licensed since 2019Licence #79200927
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · DementiaState licensing record · September 27, 2026
  • Estimated starting rate$4,650 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $3,800–$5,700
  • Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit5 of 6 beds occupiedMarch 27, 2025 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitNovember 21, 2025CDSS inspection record

Smg Residential Care is a small care home in Antioch — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents since 2019. Hospice care and bedridden care are not on file.

Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Smg Residential Care

Is Smg Residential Care licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

How many residents is Smg Residential Care licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Has Smg Residential Care been cited?

0 Type A and 2 Type B citations since 2019, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 7 state visits over the same years.

Is Smg Residential Care still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Smg Residential Care cost?

$4,650 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,800–$5,700. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 24 small homes and similar homes within 15 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 33 other homes of a similar licensed size across Contra Costa County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,500 to $5,825 a month, and the middle figure is $4,500 (n = 33 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Smg Residential Care take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Smg Residential Care Inc., per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Sutter Delta Medical Center is 1.6 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Smg Residential Care keep a resident on hospice?

Not on file — the state’s record does not list hospice care on this license. Ask: “Can a resident stay here on hospice, and under what conditions?”

Smg Residential Care license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “SMG RESIDENTIAL CARE INC”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #79200927. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed to Smg Residential Care Inc., per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2019, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 7 state inspection visits since 2019, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 2 Type B citations on file since 2019, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 7 state visits in that period.
  • 1 complaint and 2 substantiated allegations on file since 2019, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is November 21, 2025, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 6 residents
  • Dementia / memory careApproved by the state
  • Hospice careNot on file · ask the home
  • BedriddenNot on file · ask the home

State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 6 NON-AMBULATORY.

983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA

CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026

As needs change

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation on file

    Ask: “Can we read the dementia care disclosure and discuss how daily support works?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

4 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver not on file

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$4,650a month to start

Likely $3,800–$5,700

From 24 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$4,650a month

Likely $3,800–$5,900

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room
  • Starting monthly rate$4,650likely $3,800–$5,700

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 24 small homes and similar homes within 15 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $3,800–$5,900
$4,650
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,450–$9,000
$6,650
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 24 small homes and similar homes within 15 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

24 homes like this within 15 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,000–$5,000.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 24 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 2833 Fortuna Court, Antioch, CA 94509Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2021, the state has filed 7 documents for this home, and its records count 7 visits since 2019. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated November 21, 2025.

On file since
2021
State visits
7
Most recent visit
November 21, 2025
Occupied · March 27, 2025 visit
5 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 1 complaint report the state published for this home, dated March 27, 2025. 1 of the 1 carries the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (1). 1 includes the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 1 complaint report below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations0typical 0
  • Type B citations2typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations2typical 0
  • Total complaints1typical 0

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2019.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20252212024120202311020221102021110

The last 36 months — 4 of 7 documents

20252 state visits · 2 documents
Nov 21, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 11/21/25 at 2PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) D Panlilio arrived unannounced to conduct an annual required inspection. LPA met with administrator (ADM) and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA observed ADM has current RCFE certificate# 7034121740 which expires on 09/15/2027 At 2:15PM, LPA toured the facility including but not limited to the front entrance, screening station, kitchen, bathrooms, bedrooms and common areas. There is one central entry point for universal screening for staff, residents and visitors. A sign-in policy, visitor’s logs, no touch thermometer, additional face masks and hand sanitizers were observed at the screening station. Emergency Disaster Plan, Complaint poster, Personal rights, Cough/sneeze etiquette, proper hand-washing signs were observed posted in common areas. Facility has a sufficient 2-day perishable and 7-day non-perishable food supply. Facility has a 30-day supply of PPEs, paper, medications locked in cabinets. Comfortable temperature is maintained at 72 deg F. Hot water temperature was measured at 118 deg F. Facility has a mitigation plan in place and the infection control leader is the administrator. Inside and outside pathways were free of obstruction and fire hazards. Smoke and Carbon monoxide detectors were operational. Fire extinguisher was observed fully charged and last inspected on 05/13/25. LPA reviewed 3 staff and 5 resident files. Updated copies of the following documents were collected for facility file:  LIC500- Personnel Report  Resident Roster  LIC308- Designation of Facility Responsibility  LIC610E- Emergency/Disaster Plan including infection control plans  Evidence of Liability Insurance No deficiencies observed during visit. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 21, 2025
Mar 27, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not properly report an incident involving the residents Staff did not prevent the residents from engaging in a physical altercation

On 03/27/25 at 1PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) D Panlilio conducted an unannounced complaint visit, met with administrator (ADM), gathered information on the allegations and delivered investigation findings. LPA explained the purpose of the visit with ADM. During investigation, the department obtained the following documents from administrator – personnel record (LIC500), residents’ roster, admission agreements, physician's reports, re-appraisals, medical records and incident report. Continued on next page, LIC9099-C Substantiated ALLEGATION: Staff did not properly report an incident involving the residents INVESTIGATION FINDING: Substantiated During investigation, the department conducted interviews of facility staff (ADM), residents (R1, R2), reporting party (RP) and reviewed R1 & R2 documents. On 03/24/25 at 10AM, LPA interviewed reporting party (RP) who stated that R1 and R2 had a physical altercation the evening of 02/16/25 and also the next morning before breakfast in their bedroom resulting in R2 sustaining bruising in his right cheek and a cut to his nose. On 03/27/25 at 1PM, ADM confirmed with LPA that they failed to timely report the incident to Community Care Licensing (CCLD) and Ombudsman (OMB) within the required 48 hours timeline. Based on observations and interviews which were conducted and record review(s), the department has substantiated the allegation that staff did not properly report an incident involving residents. The preponderance of evidence standard has been met. Therefore, the above allegation was found to be substantiated. Continued on the next page, LIC 9099-C pg2 ALLEGATION: Staff did not prevent the residents from engaging in a physical altercation INVESTIGATION FINDING: Substantiated On 03/24/25 at 10:30AM, LPA interviewed reporting party (RP) who stated that R1 and R2 had a physical altercation on the evening of 02/16/25 resulting in R1 sustaining bruises to his face and a cut to his nose. On 03/27/25 at 1PM, LPA interviewed administrator (ADM) who stated that R1 & R2 had an argument inside their bedroom again in the morning before breakfast. ADM stated R1 punched R2 in the face which bruised his right cheek and cut his nose. On 03/27/25 at 2:35PM, R1 and R2 both confirmed with LPA that no staff redirected them when the incidents occurred inside their bedroom. ADM stated that she did not know about the incident until she noticed R2’s bruised face and cut nose the next morning during breakfast. ADM stated R2 did not want to go to the hospital to treat his nose and bruises. ADM treated him with cold compress and was offered ibuprofen which he refused. With the residents' consent, ADM moved R2 to another bedroom with another roommate to avoid reoccurrence of the incident. R1 remained in his room without any roommate. On 02/18/25, ADM stated R1 was re-evaluated by his primary care physician and was prescribed increased Olanzapine medication. Based on observations and interviews which were conducted and record review(s), the department has substantiated the allegation that staff did not prevent the residents from engaging in a physical altercation. The preponderance of evidence standard has been met. Therefore, the above allegation was found to be substantiated. Deficiencies are cited per Title 22 California Code of Regulations and listed on LIC9099D. Failure to submit proof of correction (POC) by plan of correction due date and/or any repeat deficiencies within a 12-month period may result in civil penalties. Exit interview conducted. Appeal Rights and a copy of this report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 27, 2025 · control 15-AS-20250321142651

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87211(a)(1)(c) · Plan of correction due date: Apr 18, 2025

Any suspected physical abuse that does not result in serious bodily injury of an elder or dependent adult shall be reported to the local ombudsman, the corresponding licensing agency, and the local law enforcement agency within twenty-four (24) hours as required by Welfare and Institutions Code Section 15630(b)(1). This requirement was not met as evidenced by staff’s failure to timely report incidents to Community Care Licensing (CCL) and Ombudsman which posed a potential health & safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 27, 2025

Plan of correction: By POC due date, ADM agrees to complete and submit in-service staff retraining certifications on reporting requirements in compliance with Section 87211 (a)(1)(c).

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87468.2(a)(4) · Plan of correction due date: Apr 18, 2025

To care, supervision, and services that meet their individual needs and are delivered by staff that are sufficient in numbers, qualifications, and competency to meet their needs. This requirement was not met as evidenced by staff’s failure to redirect aggressive residents which posed a potential health & safety risk to residents in carethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 27, 2025

Plan of correction: By POC due date, ADM agrees to complete and submit in-service staff retraining certifications on residents’ personal rights in compliance with Section 87468.2 (a)(4).

20241 state visit · 2 documents
Sep 6, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Incident

On 09/05/2024 at 11AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) D Panlilio conducted an unannounced Case Management visit regarding an incident that was reported to CCLD on 2/28/2024. LPA met with Administrator (ADM) and explained the purpose of the visit. The incident report received stated that on 08/27/24 resident (R1) threatened to use stolen hospital syringes on staff due to aggressive behaviors. Staff notified police who placed him under custody due to prior arrests. When R1 came back to the facility, he requested staff to take him to the local bank and leave him there. Review of R1's physician's report show he is able to leave the facility unassisted. Since R1 did not return from the bank to the facility, administrator (ADM) filed a missing person's report with police. ADM continues to work with R1's case manager and primary care physician in addressing his needs. ADM also issued a written 30 day notice of eviction to R1 (see attached) effective 09/30/24. j.zier incident report 2024-08-27 s.pdf eviction notice j.zier.pdf Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 6, 2024
Sep 6, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 09/22/23 at 10AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) D Panlilio arrived unannounced to conduct an annual required inspection. LPA met with administrator (ADM) and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA toured the facility including but not limited to the front entrance, screening station, kitchen, bathrooms, bedrooms and common areas. There is one central entry point for universal screening for staff, residents and visitors. A sign-in policy, visitor’s logs, no touch thermometer, additional face masks and hand sanitizers were observed at the screening station. Emergency Disaster Plan, Complaint poster, Personal rights, Cough/sneeze etiquette, proper hand-washing signs were observed posted in common areas. Facility has a sufficient 2-day perishable and 7-day non-perishable food supply. Facility has a 30-day supply of PPEs, paper, medications locked in cabinets. Comfortable temperature is maintained at 76 deg F. Hot water temperature was measured at 115 deg F. Facility has a mitigation plan in place and the infection control leader is the administrator. Inside and outside pathways were free of obstruction and fire hazards. Smoke and Carbon monoxide detectors were operational. Fire extinguisher was observed fully charged and last inspected on 07/21/24. LPA reviewed 3 staff and 5 resident files. Updated copies of the following documents were collected for facility file:  LIC500- Personnel Report  Resident Roster  LIC308- Designation of Facility Responsibility  LIC610E- Emergency/Disaster Plan including infection control plans  Evidence of Liability Insurance No deficiencies observed during visit. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 6, 2024
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in Contra Costa County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Contra Costa County