Skip to main content
CovelightCare
  • Start your search

    • MapExplore homes by area and what matters to you.
    • Directory
    • Guided search
    • Medi-Cal care homes

    Take a closer look

    • Check a home
    • Compare homes
    • Ask homes for me
  • Step by step

    • All care guidesEvery guide, in the order you’ll need them.
    • 1Step 1: Learn the kinds of care homes
    • 2Step 2: Ways to pay for care
    • 3Step 3: Find homes and check them
    • 4Step 4: Visit, and get the papers before you sign
    • 5Step 5: Move in
    • 6Step 6: The first months, and your rights

    Start with a question

    • Who pays for a care home?
    • Does Medi-Cal pay for a care home?
    • Board and care or assisted living?
    • Leaving the hospital soon?
    • Can a care home make someone leave?
    • Print a visit checklist
    • Check a home’s license
  • Professional tools

    • All professional tools
    • Discharge planning
    • Care management
    • Fiduciaries
    • Elder-law attorneys
    • Public-record worklist

    Care home operators

    • Manage your home’s profileYour home’s information and family inquiries.
    • Claim a home
    • Operator sign in
  • Get to know Covelight

    • How we work
    • Our data & sources
    • What’s new
    • Suggest a correction
    • Contact us
Saved homesGuided search
  • Start your search

    • MapExplore homes by area and what matters to you.
    • Directory
    • Guided search
    • Medi-Cal care homes

    Take a closer look

    • Check a home
    • Compare homes
    • Ask homes for me
  • Step by step

    • All care guidesEvery guide, in the order you’ll need them.
    • 1Step 1: Learn the kinds of care homes
    • 2Step 2: Ways to pay for care
    • 3Step 3: Find homes and check them
    • 4Step 4: Visit, and get the papers before you sign
    • 5Step 5: Move in
    • 6Step 6: The first months, and your rights

    Start with a question

    • Who pays for a care home?
    • Does Medi-Cal pay for a care home?
    • Board and care or assisted living?
    • Leaving the hospital soon?
    • Can a care home make someone leave?
    • Print a visit checklist
    • Check a home’s license
  • Professional tools

    • All professional tools
    • Discharge planning
    • Care management
    • Fiduciaries
    • Elder-law attorneys
    • Public-record worklist

    Care home operators

    • Manage your home’s profileYour home’s information and family inquiries.
    • Claim a home
    • Operator sign in
  • Get to know Covelight

    • How we work
    • Our data & sources
    • What’s new
    • Suggest a correction
    • Contact us
Guided search
Royal Oaks Home CareLicense #565801851 · Covelight Care
Covelight CareRoyal Oaks Home CareLicense #565801851 · 1106 Royal Avenue, Simi Valley, CA · (805) 210-2757Record printed from covelightcare.com — data as of the dates shown on each item.
Home/California/Ventura County/Simi Valley/Royal Oaks Home Care
Map · 1106 Royal Avenue

© Protomaps © OpenStreetMap

Estimated starting rate$5,450/mo

Covelight estimate · likely $4,500–$6,750 · See costs

Check availability

Request a tour

More days
  • AskThe cost, or your own question
  • (805) 210-2757

    From the state licensing record · October 26, 2026

Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.

RO

Call Royal Oaks Home Care

Simi Valley · Licensed for 6

(805) 210-2757

From the state licensing record · October 26, 2026

or

Let us do the legwork

  • We ask about availability, price and the care you describe.
  • If it’s a fit, you choose whether they call you. Either way, you get every answer.
Check availabilityFree

Small home · Licensed for 6 · Simi Valley

Royal Oaks Home Care

1106 Royal Avenue, Simi Valley, CA 93065 · Licensed since 2014

  • Overview
  • Care
  • Costs
  • Daily life
  • Location
  • State record

Royal Oaks Home Care

Overview

Estimated starting rate

$5,450 a month

Covelight estimate · likely $4,500–$6,750 See costs

No openings reported

  • Approved by the state: Wheelchair · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · October 26, 2026
  • Licensed for 6: a small care homeThe state license record

Ask this home

Check availability

Request a tour

More days
  • AskThe cost, or your own question

Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.

Care and support

  • Wheelchairup to 6 residents
  • Hospiceup to 2 residents
  • Bedriddenup to 1 resident

Not on file: dementia approval.

Approved by the state · State licensing record · October 26, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
6 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 1 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 2.

935 - ELDERLY

CDSS record, verbatim · October 26, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 2 — care may continue at the end of life

    State licensing record · October 26, 2026

We’ll ask for you. Not on file for Royal Oaks Home Care: two-person transfers or a lift, who is awake overnight, help with medicines and care if memory loss develops. When we check availability, we ask about these too.

Check availability

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$5,450a month to start

Likely $4,500–$6,750

From 12 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Monthly cost breakdownWith a shared room and basic help · room, care and fees$5,450likely a month
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room

Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.

  • Starting monthly rate$5,450likely $4,500–$6,750

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 12 small homes within 10 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (44 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,500one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,500 (133 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $4,500–$6,900
$5,450
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $5,250–$10,050
$7,950
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Rates at nearby homes12 nearby homes publish starting rates of $3,500 to $9,500

$3,500$9,500

EstimateLikely rangeA nearby home’s published starting rate

12 homes like this within 10 miles publish starting rates mostly between $4,200–$6,500.

  • Heartland Senior Living at SunnydaleSimi Valley · 1.0 mi · Small home
    $4,500Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Regal ResidenceSimi Valley · 3.9 mi · Small home
    $6,500Listed on its own website · seen October 27, 2026
  • Regal CareSimi Valley · 4.6 mi · Small home
    $6,500Listed on its own website · seen October 27, 2026
  • Enduring Oaks Assisted LivingMoorpark · 5.8 mi · Small home
    $3,500Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Colony of Thousand Oaks at VenusThousand Oaks · 6.3 mi · Small home
    $6,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
  • A Nurturing TouchOak Park · 6.6 mi · Small home
    $5,500Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Array Assisted LivingThousand Oaks · 7.5 mi · Small home
    $6,000Listed on its own website · explain how we care for our residents, discuss pricing (starting around · seen October 5, 2026
  • Chateau Le Petite IIIWoodland Hills · 9.1 mi · Small home
    $6,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
  • My Home of AgingWoodland Hills · 9.5 mi · Small home
    $5,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
  • The OrchardCamarillo · 9.8 mi · Small home
    $9,500Listed on its own website · seen October 27, 2026
  • Elite Retirement ResidenceWest Hills · 9.8 mi · Small home
    $5,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
  • 4th Generation Senior LivingWest Hills · 9.9 mi · Small home
    $4,500Listed on Seniorly · memory care shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026. We don’t have this home’s dementia-care disclosure. California requires a home that advertises dementia care to describe that care in writing when you ask.
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 12 small homes within 10 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time move-in fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

Ask for the price

An estimate for planning, not a quote. A home sets the price after hearing about the care needed.

Daily life

Daily life here is not on file yet. Most small homes haven’t published it, and that says nothing about the home.

The best way to see it is a visit.

Request a tour

Where it is

1106 Royal Avenue, Simi Valley, CA 93065Address from the public record · October 26, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

  1. 1Adventist Health Simi ValleyHospital · General acute care, on the state’s list2.5 mi

Straight-line distances; check the drive or the walk. Hospital: the nearest general acute care hospital on the state’s list (CDPH, September 16, 2026).

Open directions ↗

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

CDSS public record, read October 26, 2026 · License #565801851 · See the state’s own record ↗

The last 36 months — 6 of 12 documents

Complaint outcomes in these 36 months, in the state’s words: 3 “Unsubstantiated”.

20261 state visit · 1 document

Feb 9, 2026Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Brian Balisi arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a required annual visit. Upon arrival, the LPA met with staff and explained the reason for the visit. Administrator Maria Karina Antig arrived shortly after. LPA toured the physical plant areas inside and outside to ensure there are no health and safety hazards and the facility is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. At approx 10:00 a.m. LPA inspected the kitchen/food service area. Knives and sharp objects are stored in a locked cabinet underneath the sink. No cleaning supplies were observed kept underneath the sink. Kitchen appliances were observed to be in operable condition. The facility has a sufficient supply of perishable and non-perishable food properly stored at this time. LPA observed medication centrally stored and resident files securely stored in this in a cabinet in front of fridge. At the time of the visit, the common area furniture's were observed to be in good condition. A sufficient supply of clean linen and towels were observed stored in the hallways cabinets. A sufficient supply of PPE and toiletries were observed stored inaccessible to residents in care in a hallway cabinet. The facility maintained a comfortable temperature of 72 degrees Fahrenheit. Smoke detector(s) and carbon monoxide detector were operational at the time of the visit. LPA observed fire extinguishers to be fully charged and purchased in Jan, 20 2026. LPA observed six (6) bedrooms total. One (1) bedroom is designated for staff use. Resident bedrooms were observed furnished appropriately with clean linens, appropriate furnishings and sufficient lighting. There are two (2) bathrooms, they were observed to be clean and sanitary and in operating condition with grab bars and non-skid surfaces. The bathrooms were sufficiently stocked with supplies and paper towels. The hot water temperature was measured between 105 - 120 degrees Fahrenheit. LPA observed staff room to be inaccessible to residents in care and empty at this time. At approx 10:30 a.m. LPA's records review of facility sketch revealed Bedrooms #5 and #6 were not notated on the original LIC 999 on file. LIC 999 on file currently lists bedrooms #5 and #6 as one (1) shared bedroom. Staff room across bedroom #6 was also not listed on LIC 999 on file. Interview and records review with Administrator revealed they emailed LIC 200 and facility sketch to the Regional Office on 01/29/2024, but did not receive a reply. All exits have functioning auditory devices and were operational at the time of the visit. The LPA observed required postings throughout the common areas. There is an attached garage. LPA observed garage to be inaccessible to residents in care. LPA observed additional fridge and freezer to store extra perishable food. LPA also observed additional non-perishable supplies and canned goods, extra incontinent supplies, as well as additional furniture and medical equipment for facility use. The backyard has a covered outdoor area equipped with furniture including tables and chairs for resident use. The LPA observed one (1) self-latching gate with clear passageways clear of obstruction. There were no bodies of water noted at the time of the visit. Records review six (6) resident records were reviewed for, but not limited to: appraisals, medical records, admissions agreement, consent forms. All records were observed to be in order at this time. Four (4) Personnel records were reviewed for, but not limited to: personnel records, health assessments, criminal record clearances, first aid/CPR training, and the appropriate training. Medication review, medications for all residents were observed. All medications were stored properly and were appropriately documented on their respective centrally stored medication and destruction record sheets. No deficiencies were observed during medication review. Infection control / Emergency Disaster plan: During today’s visit, the LPA reviewed the facility's infection control practices and the facility's emergency disaster plan. The facility’s policies and procedures as it pertains to infection control are adequate. Emergency disaster drills are to be conducted quarterly; the facility’s last emergency disaster drill was conducted on 01/15/2026. The facility’s emergency disaster plan is up to date and is adequate. Both the infection control plan and the emergency disaster plan are reviewed/updated annually by the facility’s administrator. Smoke detectors and carbon monoxide detectors were tested, all alarms were functional at the time of the visit. The LPA obtained the following documents at the time of visit: LIC500 Personnel Report, LIC9020 Client Roster, and a copy of the facility’s liability insurance. Interviews were conducted during the visit. Pursuant to Title 22 of the California Code of Regulations Division 6, Chapter 8, the following deficiencies were cited (refer to LIC 809-D).Failure to correct the deficiencies may result in additional civil penalties. Exit interview conducted, appeal rights discussed and copy of report issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 9, 2026

20253 state visits · 3 documents

Oct 28, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not pick up resident’s medication prescription in a timely manner.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Zabel Chochian conducted a subsequent complaint visit to the facility. The purpose of the visit is to deliver investigation findings. Upon arrival LPA met with staff and staff contacted Administrator who arrived shortly after LPA. Entrance interview conducted. On 8/28/2025, the Department received a complaint with the above allegation. Information was received that resident #1 (R1) missed three doses of prescription pain medication due to staff refusing to pick it up from the pharmacy. It was alleged that the Administrator of the facility refused to pick up medication stating that she is "busy". In addition, staff also refused to pick up R1’s medications. Initial onsite visit was conducted on 09/05/2025, LPA conducted a physical plant tour with staff at approximately 11am. LPA interviewed four (4) out five (5) residents; reviewed medication records with administrator and interviewed two (2) staff from approximately 11:30am-12:45pm. LPA also discussed the allegation with Administrator. (Continue to LIC9099c). Unsubstantiated Interview conducted with Administrator indicates that R1 is self responsible; R1 is on several medications including pain medication (oxycodone). This pain medication requires a physician order for prescription to be filled by the pharmacy which R1 obtained on 08/20/2025. According to Administrator she received a text message sent by R1 which was shared with LPA, that the pain medication was ordered, and prescription was sent to Walgreens pharmacy. On 08/20/2025, Administrator went to pick medication at 12pm and the pharmacy did not have the medication ready; administrator returned at 1pm and it was still not ready, and administrator was informed that the prescription should be ready by 4pm. Administrator stated she returned at 4pm and she still had to wait at least 40min to get the medication. According to Administrator R1 was provided with the morning dose on 08/20/2025 and received the noon dose later in the evening as a result of the medication not being filled by Walgreens until after 4:30pm on 08/20/2025. Review of R1’s medication records confirmed that the paint medication was provided on 08/20/2025. Facility staff interviewed indicated that at no time did R1 go without medications. Medications reviewed during facility visits revealed that the medications were documented accordingly and administered as prescribed, on both the centrally stored medication record and the MAR for the last three months (08/2025; 07/2025 and 06/2025). R1 confirmed receiving the pain medication on 08/20/2025; R1 reported that the noon dose was given in the evening therefore R1 took another later before going to bed. Based on interview and record review, although the allegation may be valid, at this time there is insufficient evidence to support the allegation, therefore, the allegation that "Staff did not pick up resident’s medication prescription in a timely manner" is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. No citations issued. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 28, 2025 · control 29-AS-20250828085937
Oct 24, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not ensure resident's medical needs are being met. Staff yell at resident.

Licensing Program Analysts (LPA's) Brian Balisi conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to investigate the allegation list above. During today’s visit, LPA met with staff and explained the reason for the visit. Administrator Karina Antig was contacted and arrived shortly after. On 09/11/2025, from 09:30 a.m. to 02:30 p.m., LPA Balisi conducted an initial 10-day complaint visit to investigate the allegations listed above. At approximately 10:30 a.m., LPA conducted a physical plant tour, interviewed staff, resident, familes / responsible parties and reviewed and obtained copies of additional pertinent documentation relevant to the investigation. It was reported that "Staff do not ensure resident's medical needs are being met" as it was alleged that Resident #1 (R1) has requested staff to be seen by a wound specialist, due to wounds on foot. Interviews conducted and records reviewed revealed R1 has resided at this home since 05/19/2025. Unsubstantiated Upon admission a home health nurse was visiting once a week. Interviews with home health nurse of R1 revealed, on approximately 07/28/2025, they observed purple discoloration on R1's right ankle, which prompted the home health nurse to increase their visits to twice a week. On 08/05/2025, the care plan was modified. Due to R1’s inconsistent use of heel protectors, wound care was adjusted to include wrapping with gauze and to maintain dressing stability and support. Follow-up visits occurred two to three times a week for reassessment. Between 08/18 and 08/20, the dressing method was updated to include longer bandages overlapping the wound area for additional security. These remained in place most of the time but occasionally loosened when wet. By 08/25, there was no significant improvement noted. Non-adherence with heel protector use continued to impact healing progress. This concern was reported to a wound care specialist on 08/26. On 08/30, a wound care specialist visited R1 and observed the wound on the right ankle to be at a stage 2. Home health increased visits to 3 times a week and the wound care specialist visited once a week. As of today, wound care is ongoing with home health nurse conducting visits twice per week. The wound care specialist has discontinued in-person visits, as the wounds have improved and are now considered manageable under routine home health care. Based on the information obtained during the investigation, the Department does not have sufficient evidence to corroborate the allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the above allegation “Staff do not ensure resident’s medical needs are being met", is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. It was reported that "Staff yell at resident" as it was alleged, that the Administrator Karina yelled at R1 over the phone. Interviews conducted with four (4) out of (6) residents in care revealed they have never observed any staff yell or speak inappropriately to any residents in care. Interviews further revealed that residents enjoy living at the facility and reported no concerns while living at the facility. Interviews conducted with (4) residents’ families/responsible parties indicated that none expressed concerns regarding communication with the Administrator. The Administrator denied ever yelling at any residents in care. Based on the information obtained during the investigation, the Department does not have sufficient evidence to corroborate the allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the above allegation “Staff yell at resident", is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted and copy of report issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 24, 2025 · control 29-AS-20250905162647
Feb 3, 2025Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Brian Balisi arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a required annual visit. Upon arrival, the LPA met with staff and explained the reason for the visit. Administrator Maria Karina Antig arrived shortly after. LPA toured the physical plant areas inside and outside to ensure there are no health and safety hazards and the facility is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. LPA inspected the kitchen/food service area at approx. 10:45 a.m. Knives and sharp objects are stored in a locked cabinet underneath the sink. Some cleaning supplies were observed kept underneath the sink inaccessible to residents in care. Kitchen appliances were observed to be in operable condition. The facility has a sufficient supply of perishable and non-perishable food properly stored at this time. LPA observed medication centrally stored and resident files securely stored in this in a cabinet to the right of the sink. At the time of the visit, the common area furniture's were observed to be in good condition. A sufficient supply of clean linen and towels were observed stored in the hallways cabinets. A sufficient supply of PPE and toiletries were observed stored inaccessible to residents in care in a hallway cabinet. The facility maintained a comfortable temperature of 72 degrees Fahrenheit. Smoke detector(s) and carbon monoxide detector were operational at the time of the visit. LPA observed fire extinguishers to be fully charged and purchased in December 2024. LPA observed six (6) bedrooms total. One (1) bedroom is designated for staff use. Resident bedrooms were observed furnished appropriately with clean linens, appropriate furnishings and sufficient lighting. There are two (2) bathrooms, they were observed to be clean and sanitary and in operating condition with grab bars and non-skid surfaces. The bathrooms were sufficiently stocked with supplies and paper towels. The hot water temperature was measured between 105 - 120 degrees Fahrenheit. LPA observed staff room to be inaccessible to residents in care and empty at this time. All exits have functioning auditory devices and were operational at the time of the visit. The LPA observed required postings throughout the common areas. There is an attached garage. LPA observed garage to be inaccessible to residents in care. LPA observed additional fridge and freezer to store extra perishable food. LPA also observed additional non-perishable supplies and canned goods, extra incontinent supplies, as well as additional furniture and medical equipment for facility use. The backyard has a covered outdoor area equipped with furniture including tables and chairs for resident use. The LPA observed one (1) self-latching gate with clear passageways clear of obstruction. There were no bodies of water noted at the time of the visit. Records review began at approx. 12:05 p.m. Five (5) resident records were reviewed for, but not limited to: appraisals, medical records, admissions agreement, consent forms. All records were observed to be in order at this time. At approx 12:40 p.m., Four (4) Personnel records were reviewed for, but not limited to: personnel records, health assessments, criminal record clearances, first aid/CPR training, and the appropriate training. At approx 12:50 p.m. LPA did not observe first aid / CPR training for Staff #1 (S1) and Staff #2(S2). Last emergency disaster drill was conducted on Jan 18, 2025. Medications review began at approx. 02:30 p.m. All medications including PRNs were labeled, stored and inaccessible to residents in care. Medications were observed to be administered as prescribed at this time. Infection control: Upon entry, the facility has a central entry point for symptom screening, temperature checks, and sanitation station. At this time, the staff will continue to keep up signs that promotes good hand hygiene and symptoms of a communicable disease. The facility has an adequate supply of Personal Protection Equipment (PPE), and the facility is able to obtain additional supplies as needed. The facility’s cleaning protocol is sufficient. If needed, the facility has the capacity to designate a single isolation room if the facility has a confirmed case of an infectious disease. The facility’s policies and procedures as it pertains to infection control are adequate. The LPA obtained the following documents at the time of visit: LIC500 Personnel Report, LIC9020 Client Roster, and a copy of the facility’s liability insurance. Interviews were conducted during the visit. Pursuant to Title 22 of the California Code of Regulations Division 6, Chapter 8, the following deficiencies were cited (refer to LIC 809-D).Failure to correct the deficiencies may result in additional civil penalties. Exit interview conducted, appeal rights discussed and copy of report issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 3, 2025

20242 state visits · 2 documents

Aug 13, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff hit resident in care resulting in bruising.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Martha Arroyo conducted a subsequent complaint visit to the above facility. The purpose of the visit is to deliver findings for the above allegation. The initial visit was conducted on 07/18/2024 by LPA M. Arroyo. On today's visit, LPA Arroyo met with Administrator, Karina Antig. Entrance interview. During the initial visit on 07/18/2024, LPA Arroyo conducted a plant tour at 6:38 p.m., conducted interviews with the Administrator, two (2) staff members, and five (5) residents between 5:47 p.m. and 7:12 p.m., conducted a file review at 5:20 p.m., and obtained copies of pertinent documents relevant to the investigation. Report Continued on LIC 9099C... Unsubstantiated Report Continued from LIC 9099... It was alleged that facility staff hit resident in care resulting in bruising. It was reported that Resident #1 (R1) was physically abused by Staff #1 (S1). The complainant stated that R1 was slapped on the wrist by S1 while applying lotion which resulted in a bruise and possibly a broken wrist. Record review and interviews conducted revealed that R1 gets itchy due to the medication currently prescribed. This sometimes leave a mark because R1 tries to constantly scratch. However, facility staff assist R1 is applying the lotion so that R1 does not scratch while applying it themselves. Staff stated that R1 gets lotion applied three (3) times a day to relieve the itching. Staff also added that R1 tends to make inappropriate comments to the male staff while being assisted with Activities of Daily Living (ADL’s) resulting in having two (2) staff present at all times while assisting R1. During an interview with R1, R1 was asked about the bruising on their wrist. However, R1 was unable to describe the bruising or point where the bruising was. Additional Interviews conducted with residents revealed that they had no concerns living at the facility. Residents stated that facility staff is nice and do their best to keep all the residents happy. Furthermore, residents denied facility staff being rough or aggressive with them at any time while living at the facility. Based on the information obtained during the investigation, the Department does not have sufficient evidence to corroborate the allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the above allegation “facility staff hit resident in care resulting in bruising", is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 13, 2024 · control 29-AS-20240717152528
Feb 20, 2024Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Zabel Chochian arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a required annual visit. Upon arrival LPA met with staff (2). Staff contacted back-up administrator Karina Antig, who arrived shortly after LPA. Reason for the visit was stated. At approximately 11:45am, the LPA and administrator toured the physical plant areas inside and outside to ensure there are no health and safety hazards and the facility is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. Smoke and carbon monoxide detectors tested and functioned properly during today's visit. KITCHEN: Knives and cleaning supplies are stored in a locked cabinet. Kitchen appliances were in operable condition. The facility has a sufficient supply of perishable and non-perishable food. Medications were stored in a locked cabinet . The door to the garage, which is in the kitchen observed locked during today's visit. BEDROOMS: The LPA observed six single-occupancy client bedrooms which were furnished appropriately with clean linens, appropriate furnishings and sufficient lighting; and one staff room. RESTROOMS: Restrooms observed to be clean, sanitary and in operating condition; stocked with paper towels, toilet paper and soap. Restrooms observed with grab bars installed and shower mats. The facility had an adequate supply of Personal Protection Equipment (PPE) and the facility is able to obtain additional supplies as needed. COMMON SPACES: The living room, family room and dining room furniture were observed to be in good condition. The backyard patio is equipped with furniture for resident use. Resident files reviewed for completeness and accuracy at approximately 12:30pm. Five (5) out of six (6) resident files did not have an updated Needs and Services Plan. Staff files reviewed at approximately 3pm Staff 1 and 2 did not have record of TB clearance; Initial required training for staff was not met; staff lacked medication shadowing and dementia care training hours. Resident Medication records reviewed at approximately 4pm - Medication records and procedures reviewed and observed to complete and accurate. Pursuant to Title 22 CA Code of Regulations, the following deficiencies were cited (refer to LIC 809-D). Exit interview conducted. Copy of report and appeal rights provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 20, 2024
Earlier years2022 to 2023 · 6 documents

20231 state visit · 1 document

Feb 3, 2023Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Teresa Camara arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a required annual visit at 09:35 a.m. This annual had a specific emphasis on infection control practices and procedures. The LPA met with back-up Administrator Karina Antig and explained the reason for the visit. The LPA toured the physical plant areas inside and outside to ensure there are no health and safety hazards and the facility is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. The carbon monoxide and smoke alarms were tested and all functioned properly. The fire extinguisher appeared fully charged and was purchased 5/10/22.. KITCHEN: Knives and cleaning supplies are stored in a locked cabinet. Kitchen appliances were in operable condition. The facility has a sufficient supply of perishable and non-perishable food. Medications were stored in a locked cabinet . The door to the garage, which is in the kitchen was unlocked; laundry detergent, cleaning supplies (Pinesol, Clorox) were accessible; Staff 2 (S2) locked the garage door during the visit. BEDROOMS: The LPA observed four single-occupancy client bedrooms and one double-occupancy bedroom which were furnished appropriately with clean linens, appropriate furnishings and sufficient lighting. The staff room was open and there were vitamins unsecured in the room; Staff 1 (S1) locked the door during the visit. RESTROOMS: Restrooms are clean and sanitary and in operating condition. LPA observed two pair of scissors in unlocked drawers in one of the hall bathrooms; S1 locked the scissors in the bathroom cabinet during the visit. COMMON SPACES: The living room, family room and dining room furniture were observed to be in good condition. The backyard patio is equipped with furniture for resident use. continued on 809-C continued from 809 INFECTION CONTROL: During today’s visit, the LPA spoke with the Administrator regarding the facility’s infection control practices. Upon entry, the facility has a central entry point for symptom screening and sanitation station. Staff were wearing masks. Infection control postings were observed.. The facility had an adequate supply of Personal Protection Equipment (PPE) and the facility is able to obtain additional supplies as needed. The facility has appropriate plans in place in the event of clients and/or staff showing symptoms of COVID or testing positive for COVID. Pursuant to Title 22 CA Code of Regulations, the following deficiencies were cited (refer to LIC 809-D). Exit interview conducted. Today's reports and appeal rights were discussed and report was emailed to the administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 3, 2023

20223 state visits · 5 documents

Nov 22, 2022Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff caused resident to fall Staff physically restrained resident Staff prevented resident from leaving facility

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Teresa Camara conducted a subsequent complaint investigation visit regarding the above noted allegations to amend the complaint findings for three of the allegations. LPA met with co-administrator Karina Antig and explained the reason for the visit. This amended report is to address findings issued on 7/21/2022. On 7/21/2022, LPA Camara interviewed staff 1 (S1) at 12:30 p.m., the administrator at 12:50 p.m., and resident 1 (R1) at 2:30 p.m. LPA was unable to interview other residents due to their cognitive issues. On 10/20/2022, LPA Camara interviewed witness 1 (W1) at 3:20 p.m. and witness 2 (W2) at 3:47 pm. On 11/15/2022, LPA Camara interviewed witness 3 (W3) at 3:03 p.m. (continued 9099-C) Substantiated Regarding the allegations that staff caused a resident (R1) to fall, staff physically restrained resident, and staff prevented resident from leaving the facility, the complainant’s concern was that inappropriate behavior by staff, which included physically restraining R1 in an effort to prevent them from exiting the facility, caused R1 to fall. During the interviews conducted on 7/21/2022, S1 stated that on 7/7/2022, R1 attempted to elope from the facility through the garage as R1 wanted additional cigarettes and to return home. S1 stated they prevented R1 from leaving the facility by blocking R1, but S1 insisted to the LPA they did not put their hands on R1. S1 stated they were holding a plate of food at the time and R1 slapped the plate of food out of S1’s hand. S1 stated that the action of hitting the plate caused R1 to lose their balance and fall back into some boxes in the garage. During LPA’s interview with R1, they gave substantively the same statement. However, during the LPA’s interviews with witnesses and review of police records, it was found that R1 and S1 gave different statements to the police. On 7/7/2022, S1 told the police that they grabbed R1’s wrists to prevent R1 from leaving the facility. While holding R1’s wrists, S1 walked R1 backward into the garage but R1 lost their balance and fell. R1’s statement to the police on 7/7/2022 indicated S1 grabbed R1 by the shoulder and pushed r1 down. The police did not find any evidence of assault, but they did indicate to the administrator the staff should have a hands-off approach to addressing R1’s elopement attempts. Although the above noted allegations were found unsubstantiated during the initial complaint visit on 7/21/2022, after further review of documents and additional witness interviews, the above noted allegations are deemed SUBSTANTIATED at this time. Pursuant to Title 22 CA Code of Regulations, the following deficiencies were cited (refer to LIC 9099-D). Exit interview conducted. Today's report and appeal rights were discussed and emailed.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 22, 2022 · control 29-AS-20220718164215

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87468.1(a)(3) · Plan of correction due date: Dec 2, 2022

87468.1 Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities (a) Residents in all residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following personal rights: (3) To be free from punishment, humiliation, intimidation, abuse, or other actions of a punitive nature, such as withholding residents’ money or interfering with daily living functions such as eating, sleeping, or elimination. Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above, as R1 was physically restrained by S1, which poses a potential health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 22, 2022

Plan of correction: Administrator will conduct training with staff regarding personal rights and not restraining residents and provide evidence of this training to CCL by 12/02/2022.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87468.1(a)(6) · Plan of correction due date: Dec 2, 2022

87468.1 Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities (a) Residents in all residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following personal rights: (6) To leave or depart the facility at any time and to not be locked into any room, building, or on facility premises by day or night. This does not prohibit a licensee from establishing house rules, such as locking doors at night to protect residents, or barring windows against intruders, with permission from the Department. Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above, as R1 was physically restrainedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 22, 2022

Plan of correction: Administrator will conduct training with staff regarding personal rights and not stopping residents from leaving the facility (ok to follow) and provide evidence of this training to CCL by 12/02/2022. from leaving facility, which poses a porential health and safety risk to residents in care.

Nov 22, 2022Facility evaluation reportCase Management - DeficienciesDeficiency page: Type A

Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Teresa Camara conducted a case management-deficiencies visit while visiting the facility regarding an unrelated complaint number 29-AS-20220718164215. LPA met with co-administrator Karina Antig and explained the reason for the visit. At approximately 11:36 am, while briefly touring the facility, LPA observed Resident 1 (R1) with what appeared to be intravenous (IV) bags being administered. LPA inquired with Staff 1 (S1) about the IV bags and S1 stated R1 has a gastronomy tube (g-tube). S1 stated R1 has had the g-tube since date of admission 6/20/2022. LPA spoke with the administrator regarding R1's g-tube at approximately 12:30 p.m. The administrator stated when she admitted R1 she was told R1 would be placed on hospice. However, R1's condition started improving and R1 was never put on hospice. R1 receives home health services for the g-tube. R1 has started eating food and R1's gastroenterologist indicated they might remove R1's g-tube. The administrator stated she would contact R1's doctor and request an update. If R1 is not placed on hospice or have the g-tube removed, she will notify R1's responsible party that R1 must be placed in a skilled nursing facility. Pursuant to Title 22 CA Code of Regulations, the following deficiencies were cited (refer to LIC 9099-D). Exit interview conducted. Today's report and appeal rights were discussed and emailed.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 22, 2022

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87615(a)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Nov 28, 2022

87615 Prohibited Health Conditions (a) Persons who require health services for or have a health condition including, but not limited to, those specified below shall not be admitted or retained in a residential care facility for the elderly: (2) Gastrostomy tubes. Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above, as R1 has a g-tube, which poses an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 22, 2022

Plan of correction: Administrator will contact R1's physician to determine if R1 will be placed on hospice as originally planned. If not, R1's responsible party will be contacted and R1 will be immediately relocated to an appropriate facility. Administrator will submit evidence of this to CCL on or before 11/28/2022.

Jul 21, 2022Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility did not refund fees paid in advance covering the time after the

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Teresa Camara conducted an initial complaint investigation visit regarding the above noted allegtion. LPA met with co-administrator Karina Antig and explained the reason for the visit. LPA met with the administrator at 12:50 p.m. The administrator indicated the company had their bookkeeper resign unexpectedly and she lost the information needed in order to provide a refund to the decedent's spouse. The administrator confirmed the decedent passed away on 1/17/22 and the spouse removed the decedent's property on 1/18/22. The spouse had paid fees for 1/16/22 - 2/15/22 in the amount of $4,500. Therefore, the licensee owes the spouse the prorated amount of $4,064.48 for 1/19/22-2/15/22. The above noted allegtion is deemed Substantiated at this time. Pursuant to Title 22 CA Code of Regulations, the following deficiencies were cited (refer to LIC 9099-D). Exit interview conducted. Today's report and appeal rights were discussed and emailed. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 21, 2022 · control 29-AS-20220713130343

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: HSC 1569.652(c) · Plan of correction due date: Jul 28, 2022

§1569.652 Termination of admission agreement upon death of resident; removal of resident’s property; refund of fees paid; notice of contract termination and refunds (c) A refund of any fees paid in advance covering the time after the resident’s personal property has been removed from the facility shall be issued to the individual, individuals, or entity contractually responsible for the fees or, if the deceased resident paid the fees, to the resident’s estate, within 15 days after the personal property is removed. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on information provided by administrator, decedent passed away 1/17/22, decedent's wife removed all property bythe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 21, 2022

Plan of correction: Administrator will ensure a refund is sent to decedent's spouse by 7/28/2022 and send evidence of the payment. In addition, the administrator will review Health & Safety Code 1569.652 and submit a statement of understanding to CCL by 7/28/2022. 1/18/22 but a refund of the remaining fees has not been given to decedent's spouse.

Jul 21, 2022Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff accused resident of theft Staff is not giving resident medications on time Staff is not maintaining a medication log Staff caused resident to scratch arm Staff elbowed resident in abdomen

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Teresa Camara conducted a subsequent complaint investigation visit to amend the report regarding the above noted allegations. Please refer to the LIC 9099-A for the previously unsubstantiated allegations which after re-evaluation were changed to a substantiated finding. The LPA met with co-administrator Karina Antig and explained the reason for the visit. This amended report is to address findings issued on 7/21/2022. On 7/21/2022, LPA Camara interviewed staff 1 (S1) at 12:30 p.m., the administrator at 12:50 p.m., and resident 1 (R1) at 2:30 p.m. LPA was unable to interview other residents due to their cognitive issues. On 10/20/2022, LPA Camara interviewed witness 1 (W1) at 3:20 p.m. and witness 2 (W2) at 3:47 pm. On 11/15/2022, LPA Camara interviewed witness 3 (W3) at 3:03 p.m. Regarding the allegation staff accused a resident of theft, specifically stealing another resident’s bowl of oatmeal, LPA interviewed staff and R1. It was found that S1 had left the dining room to bring out another resident for breakfast and when S1 returned they discovered that R1 had eaten the other resident’s oatmeal. S1 informed R1 that if they wanted more food they can just ask, but R1 was offended and called 9-1-1 for Unsubstantiated the police. Based on police records and witness statements, R1 told the police S1 accused R1 of stealing another resident’s oatmeal. However, when LPA interviewed R1, R1 stated there was a misunderstanding about the theft accusation on 7/5/2022 and it was in fact another resident who accused R1 of theft. Therefore, the allegation staff accused resident (R1) of theft, is found as UNSUBSTANTIATED. Regarding the allegation staff is not giving R1 medications on time, LPA conducted interviews with staff and R1. While the police were at the facility on 7/5/2022, R1 told the police that staff were not giving their medications on time. LPA reviewed medication records which indicated R1 was being given medications as prescribed. During R1’s interview with the LPA on 7/21/2022, they stated they have been receiving medications on time, as prescribed. Therefore, due to conflicts in statements by R1, the allegation that staff are not giving the resident medication on time is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Regarding the allegation staff are not maintaining a medication log, LPA conducted interviews with staff, R1, administrator and a witness. LPA also reviewed the medication logs as well as physician orders for R1. The medications logs were complete, and it appeared R1 was receiving medications as prescribed. The witness had stated the morning medications had not been logged during their visit on 7/5/2022. Staff indicated they administer medications with breakfast and write in the log later in the morning or early afternoon. During LPA’s visit the medication logs appeared to be properly maintained. Therefore, based on this investigation, the allegation that staff are not maintaining a medication log, the finding is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Regarding the allegations staff caused resident to scratch arm and staff elbowed resident in abdomen during staff intervention to prevent R1 from eloping from the facility, LPA conducted interviews with staff, administrator, R1 and a witness. Staff and administrator stated R1 was frustrated about not receiving enough cigarettes and had increased anxiety causing R1 to want to leave the facility. R1's conservator had instructed administrator to scale back on the amount of cigarettes R1 smoked daily. R1 had reported to the police on 7/7/2022 that S1 caused a scratch on their arm and elbowed them in the abdomen. However, witness interviews and a review of police records did not indicate any evidence that R1 was scratched on their arm or elbowed in the abdomen by S1. When LPA interviewed R1 on 7/21/22, R1 was not sure how their arm was scratched and denied being elbowed in the abdomen. R1 confirmed the reason for getting upset and trying to leave the facility boiled down to wanting more cigarettes and their desire to go back home. R1 admitted to being very difficult with staff. R1 stated they slapped a plate of food out of S1’s hand on 7/7/2022 while trying to elope. R1 had no complaints about staff and said they feel safe with all the staff and the administrator at the facility. R1 has agreed with the administrator to call the administrator first, before calling 9-1-1, whenever R1 feels frustrated in the future. Based on the information obtained from interviews and records, the allegation staff caused resident to scratch arm and staff elbowed resident in abdomen are deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. Exit interview conducted and report emailed to administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 21, 2022 · control 29-AS-20220718164215
Feb 1, 2022Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Teresa Camara arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a required annual visit at 09:40 a.m. This annual had a specific emphasis on infection control practices and procedures. The LPA met with back-up Administrator Karina Antig and explained the reason for the visit. The LPA toured the physical plant areas inside and outside to ensure there are no health and safety hazards and the facility is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. The carbon monoxide and smoke alarms were tested and all functioned properly. The fire extinguisher appeared fully charged. KITCHEN: Knives and cleaning supplies are stored in a locked cabinet. Kitchen appliances were in operable condition. The facility has a sufficient supply of perishable and non-perishable food. Medications were stored in a cabinet which was not properly secured which made the medications accessible. The door to the garage, which is in the kitchen and it was unlocked; laundry detergent and lighters were accessible. BEDROOMS: The LPA observed four single-occupancy client bedrooms and one shared bedroom which were furnished appropriately with clean linens, appropriate furnishings and sufficient lighting. RESTROOMS: Restrooms are clean and sanitary and in operating condition. LPA observed Lysol and Calmoseptine were in an unlocked cabinet. COMMON SPACES: The living room, family room and dining room furniture were observed to be in good condition. The backyard patio is equipped with furniture for resident use. continued on 809-C continued from 809 INFECTION CONTROL: During today’s visit, the LPA spoke with the Administrator regarding the facility’s infection control practices. Upon entry, the facility has a central entry point for symptom screening and sanitation station. Staff was not wearing a mask upon LPA's entry. Infection control postings were missing. The facility had an adequate supply of Personal Protection Equipment (PPE) and the facility is able to obtain additional supplies as needed. The facility has appropriate plans in place in the event of clients and/or staff showing symptoms of COVID or testing positive for COVID. Pursuant to Title 22 CA Code of Regulations, the following deficiencies were cited (refer to LIC 809-D). Exit interview conducted. Today's reports and appeal rights were discussed and issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 1, 2022

The state marks this report as 5 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 3. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

6 of 6 beds were occupied at the October 28, 2025 state visit — a count on that day, not an opening.

License holder

Happy Home Care, Inc., licensed since 2014.

The state’s totals for this licenseSince 2014, as the state’s facility page counts them
State visits on file
12
Total complaints
5
Substantiated allegations
4
Type A citations
0
Type B citations
3

These are the state’s own totals for this license since 2014, per CDSS records. The state counts them apart from the documents above, and they can differ from what those documents show; the documents say what each visit found. One complaint can contain several allegations.

Compare with homes the same size
This homeTypical
Type A citations00
Type B citations30
Substantiated allegations40
Total complaints50

“Typical” is the statewide median for licensed homes this size. It does not adjust for years licensed, and older licenses have had more visits and reports. The median is across the 6,916 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record. The figures compared are the state’s totals, not the documents.

What the state’s words mean
Routine visita visit the state records as “Required” — a scheduled visit, not one made in answer to a complaintSubstantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents stand in their place.

Open CDSS facility search ↗Report a record errorOperate this home? Respond or correct, free →
Frequently asked questions

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Royal Oaks Home Care

Is Royal Oaks Home Care licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

How many residents is Royal Oaks Home Care licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

Has Royal Oaks Home Care been cited?

0 Type A and 3 Type B citations since 2014, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. Those records count 12 state visits over the same years.

Is Royal Oaks Home Care still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of November 11, 2026.

What does Royal Oaks Home Care cost?

$5,450 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $4,500–$6,750. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 12 small homes within 10 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 21 other homes of a similar licensed size across Ventura County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,688 to $6,500 a month, and the middle figure is $5,700 (n = 21 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date between September and October 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Royal Oaks Home Care take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Happy Home Care, Inc., per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Adventist Health Simi Valley is 2.5 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Royal Oaks Home Care keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 2 residents, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

Royal Oaks Home Care license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “ROYAL OAKS HOME CARE”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #565801851. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • Licensed to Happy Home Care, Inc., per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2014, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • 12 state inspection visits since 2014, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 3 Type B citations on file since 2014, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. The same records count 12 state visits in that period.
  • 5 complaints and 4 substantiated allegations on file since 2014, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is February 9, 2026, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Nearby

Other homes nearby

Licensed homes near this one in Ventura County, most information on file first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

  • Map

    Simi Valley · 0.3 mi

    Maricar's Manor II

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $5,750 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $4,750–$7,100

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Dementia: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record
  • Map

    Simi Valley · 0.3 mi

    Golden Acres RCFE II

    Small home · licensed for 5

    Estimated starting rate

    $5,050 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $4,150–$6,200

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
  • Map

    Simi Valley · 0.4 mi

    Simi Valley Residential Care V

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $5,100 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $4,200–$6,300

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record
  • Map

    Simi Valley · 0.4 mi

    Caccam's Sorrel Residence

    Small home · licensed for 5

    Estimated starting rate

    $5,000 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $4,100–$6,150

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Dementia: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
  • Map

    Simi Valley · 0.5 mi

    St. Paul's Home Care II

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $4,900 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $4,000–$6,050

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
  • Map

    Simi Valley · 0.7 mi

    Carmel Home

    Small home · licensed for 4

    Estimated starting rate

    $5,100 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $4,200–$6,300

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record

Street maps © Protomaps · © OpenStreetMap

Explore Ventura County ↗

Do you run this home?

Add your photos, care details, and contact information. Your public profile is free.

Claim this home
Visiting in person? Print a visit sheetHow we source information
CallAsk this home
RO

Call Royal Oaks Home Care

Simi Valley · Licensed for 6

(805) 210-2757

From the state licensing record · October 26, 2026

or

Let us do the legwork

  • We ask about availability, price and the care you describe.
  • If it’s a fit, you choose whether they call you. Either way, you get every answer.
Check availabilityFree

Ask Royal Oaks Home Care

Check availability

Request a tour

More days
  • AskThe cost, or your own question

Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.

Covelight Care

A free directory of every licensed care home in California, built from CDSS public records.

Find your next step

Find a homeSaved homesHelp me chooseCheck a home

Make sense of care

Care guidesMedi-Cal & careYour rightsHow we workAbout this site

Work with Covelight

For professionalsFor home operatorsSuggest a correctionDevelopersContact us

© 2026 Covelight Care LLC. Homes never pay to appear or rank higher.

Covelight Care is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the sources named on this page.

3104 O St Unit #1023, Sacramento, CA 95816

PrivacyTermsText messages