Royal Oaks Home Care is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Simi Valley, Ventura County, California — state license #565801851, licensed for 6 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 11 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2022, the most recent dated February 9, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

19 homes in view

Royal Oaks Home Care

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Small home, 6 residents · Simi Valley, CA · Ventura County
LicensedWheelchairHospiceBedriddenMemory care not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #565801851, held since 2014 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
1106 Royal Avenue · Simi Valley, Ventura County
Phone
(805) 210-2757
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 6 residents
Dementia / memory careNot on file — ask the home
Hospice careApproved for 2 residents
Bedridden careApproved for 1 resident

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
6 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 1 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 2.State service designation935 - ELDERLYthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2022, the state has visited this home 12 times and filed 11 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated February 9, 2026.

Most recent state visit
February 9, 2026
Occupancy at the October 28, 2025 visit
6 of 6 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 6 documents with transcribed findings, dated July 21, 2022 to October 28, 2025. 6 of the 6 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (2), “Unsubstantiated” (4). 6 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 6 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 6 of 11 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20261 state visit · 1 document
Feb 9, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20253 state visits · 3 documents
Oct 28, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not pick up resident’s medication prescription in a timely manner.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Zabel Chochian conducted a subsequent complaint visit to the facility. The purpose of the visit is to deliver investigation findings. Upon arrival LPA met with staff and staff contacted Administrator who arrived shortly after LPA. Entrance interview conducted. On 8/28/2025, the Department received a complaint with the above allegation. Information was received that resident #1 (R1) missed three doses of prescription pain medication due to staff refusing to pick it up from the pharmacy. It was alleged that the Administrator of the facility refused to pick up medication stating that she is "busy". In addition, staff also refused to pick up R1’s medications. Initial onsite visit was conducted on 09/05/2025, LPA conducted a physical plant tour with staff at approximately 11am. LPA interviewed four (4) out five (5) residents; reviewed medication records with administrator and interviewed two (2) staff from approximately 11:30am-12:45pm. LPA also discussed thethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 28, 2025 · control 29-AS-20250828085937
Oct 24, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not ensure resident's medical needs are being met. Staff yell at resident.

Licensing Program Analysts (LPA's) Brian Balisi conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to investigate the allegation list above. During today’s visit, LPA met with staff and explained the reason for the visit. Administrator Karina Antig was contacted and arrived shortly after. On 09/11/2025, from 09:30 a.m. to 02:30 p.m., LPA Balisi conducted an initial 10-day complaint visit to investigate the allegations listed above. At approximately 10:30 a.m., LPA conducted a physical plant tour, interviewed staff, resident, familes / responsible parties and reviewed and obtained copies of additional pertinent documentation relevant to the investigation. It was reported that "Staff do not ensure resident's medical needs are being met" as it was alleged that Resident #1 (R1) has requested staff to be seen by a wound specialist, due to wounds on foot. Interviews conducted and records reviewed revealed R1 has resided at this home since 05/19/2025. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 24, 2025 · control 29-AS-20250905162647
Feb 3, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20242 state visits · 2 documents
Aug 13, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff hit resident in care resulting in bruising.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Martha Arroyo conducted a subsequent complaint visit to the above facility. The purpose of the visit is to deliver findings for the above allegation. The initial visit was conducted on 07/18/2024 by LPA M. Arroyo. On today's visit, LPA Arroyo met with Administrator, Karina Antig. Entrance interview. During the initial visit on 07/18/2024, LPA Arroyo conducted a plant tour at 6:38 p.m., conducted interviews with the Administrator, two (2) staff members, and five (5) residents between 5:47 p.m. and 7:12 p.m., conducted a file review at 5:20 p.m., and obtained copies of pertinent documents relevant to the investigation. Report Continued on LIC 9099C... Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 13, 2024 · control 29-AS-20240717152528
Feb 20, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations0typical 0
Type B citations3typical 0
Substantiated complaints4typical 0
Total complaints5typical 0
State visits on file12typical 6
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 5,773 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2014.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20261102025330202422020231102022352
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

≈ $4,000–$6,500 /mo
our estimate — Ventura County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,000 · statewide low$8,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
Ask how the 2022 complaint investigation report was corrected — what changed?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (805) 210-2757

Is Royal Oaks Home Care licensed?

Yes — Royal Oaks Home Care is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Simi Valley (Ventura County): California license #565801851, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 6 residents. State records list 11 inspection and complaint documents since 2022; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated February 9, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Royal Oaks Home Care care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Royal Oaks Home Care with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, hospice care, and bedridden; it does not list dementia / memory care. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license record6 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 1 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 2.

How much does Royal Oaks Home Care cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Royal Oaks Home Care's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Ventura County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Royal Oaks Home Care accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Royal Oaks Home Care is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

6 of 6 beds occupied (100%) when the state visited on October 28, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Royal Oaks Home Care?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 12 state visits and 11 dated documents since 2022 for Royal Oaks Home Care; 6 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated October 28, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated”. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

6 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not pick up resident’s medication prescription in a timely manner.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Zabel Chochian conducted a subsequent complaint visit to the facility. The purpose of the visit is to deliver investigation findings. Upon arrival LPA met with staff and staff contacted Administrator who arrived shortly after LPA. Entrance interview conducted. On 8/28/2025, the Department received a complaint with the above allegation. Information was received that resident #1 (R1) missed three doses of prescription pain medication due to staff refusing to pick it up from the pharmacy. It was alleged that the Administrator of the facility refused to pick up medication stating that she is "busy". In addition, staff also refused to pick up R1’s medications. Initial onsite visit was conducted on 09/05/2025, LPA conducted a physical plant tour with staff at approximately 11am. LPA interviewed four (4) out five (5) residents; reviewed medication records with administrator and interviewed two (2) staff from approximately 11:30am-12:45pm. LPA also discussed the— CDSS inspection report, October 28, 2025 · control 29-AS-20250828085937
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not ensure resident's medical needs are being met. Staff yell at resident.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPA's) Brian Balisi conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to investigate the allegation list above. During today’s visit, LPA met with staff and explained the reason for the visit. Administrator Karina Antig was contacted and arrived shortly after. On 09/11/2025, from 09:30 a.m. to 02:30 p.m., LPA Balisi conducted an initial 10-day complaint visit to investigate the allegations listed above. At approximately 10:30 a.m., LPA conducted a physical plant tour, interviewed staff, resident, familes / responsible parties and reviewed and obtained copies of additional pertinent documentation relevant to the investigation. It was reported that "Staff do not ensure resident's medical needs are being met" as it was alleged that Resident #1 (R1) has requested staff to be seen by a wound specialist, due to wounds on foot. Interviews conducted and records reviewed revealed R1 has resided at this home since 05/19/2025. Unsubstantiated— CDSS inspection report, October 24, 2025 · control 29-AS-20250905162647

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff hit resident in care resulting in bruising.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Martha Arroyo conducted a subsequent complaint visit to the above facility. The purpose of the visit is to deliver findings for the above allegation. The initial visit was conducted on 07/18/2024 by LPA M. Arroyo. On today's visit, LPA Arroyo met with Administrator, Karina Antig. Entrance interview. During the initial visit on 07/18/2024, LPA Arroyo conducted a plant tour at 6:38 p.m., conducted interviews with the Administrator, two (2) staff members, and five (5) residents between 5:47 p.m. and 7:12 p.m., conducted a file review at 5:20 p.m., and obtained copies of pertinent documents relevant to the investigation. Report Continued on LIC 9099C... Unsubstantiated— CDSS inspection report, August 13, 2024 · control 29-AS-20240717152528

2022

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff caused resident to fall Staff physically restrained resident Staff prevented resident from leaving facility
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Teresa Camara conducted a subsequent complaint investigation visit regarding the above noted allegations to amend the complaint findings for three of the allegations. LPA met with co-administrator Karina Antig and explained the reason for the visit. This amended report is to address findings issued on 7/21/2022. On 7/21/2022, LPA Camara interviewed staff 1 (S1) at 12:30 p.m., the administrator at 12:50 p.m., and resident 1 (R1) at 2:30 p.m. LPA was unable to interview other residents due to their cognitive issues. On 10/20/2022, LPA Camara interviewed witness 1 (W1) at 3:20 p.m. and witness 2 (W2) at 3:47 pm. On 11/15/2022, LPA Camara interviewed witness 3 (W3) at 3:03 p.m. (continued 9099-C) Substantiated— CDSS inspection report, November 22, 2022 · control 29-AS-20220718164215
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility did not refund fees paid in advance covering the time after the
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Teresa Camara conducted an initial complaint investigation visit regarding the above noted allegtion. LPA met with co-administrator Karina Antig and explained the reason for the visit. LPA met with the administrator at 12:50 p.m. The administrator indicated the company had their bookkeeper resign unexpectedly and she lost the information needed in order to provide a refund to the decedent's spouse. The administrator confirmed the decedent passed away on 1/17/22 and the spouse removed the decedent's property on 1/18/22. The spouse had paid fees for 1/16/22 - 2/15/22 in the amount of $4,500. Therefore, the licensee owes the spouse the prorated amount of $4,064.48 for 1/19/22-2/15/22. The above noted allegtion is deemed Substantiated at this time. Pursuant to Title 22 CA Code of Regulations, the following deficiencies were cited (refer to LIC 9099-D). Exit interview conducted. Today's report and appeal rights were discussed and emailed. Substantiated— CDSS inspection report, July 21, 2022 · control 29-AS-20220713130343
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff accused resident of theft Staff is not giving resident medications on time Staff is not maintaining a medication log Staff caused resident to scratch arm Staff elbowed resident in abdomen
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Teresa Camara conducted a subsequent complaint investigation visit to amend the report regarding the above noted allegations. Please refer to the LIC 9099-A for the previously unsubstantiated allegations which after re-evaluation were changed to a substantiated finding. The LPA met with co-administrator Karina Antig and explained the reason for the visit. This amended report is to address findings issued on 7/21/2022. On 7/21/2022, LPA Camara interviewed staff 1 (S1) at 12:30 p.m., the administrator at 12:50 p.m., and resident 1 (R1) at 2:30 p.m. LPA was unable to interview other residents due to their cognitive issues. On 10/20/2022, LPA Camara interviewed witness 1 (W1) at 3:20 p.m. and witness 2 (W2) at 3:47 pm. On 11/15/2022, LPA Camara interviewed witness 3 (W3) at 3:03 p.m. Regarding the allegation staff accused a resident of theft, specifically stealing another resident’s bowl of oatmeal, LPA interviewed staff and R1. It was found that S1 had left— CDSS inspection report, July 21, 2022 · control 29-AS-20220718164215

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 12 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds), computed across all 5,773 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
0
typical for this size: 0
Type B citations
3
typical for this size: 0
Substantiated complaints
4
typical for this size: 0
Total complaints
5
typical for this size: 0
State visits on file
12
typical for this size: 6
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(805) 210-2757
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Royal Oaks Home Care? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.