Stratford At Beyer Park, The is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Modesto, Stanislaus County, California — state license #507002509, licensed for 107 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 10 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated November 14, 2025 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

17 homes in view

Stratford At Beyer Park, The

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 107 residents · Modesto, CA · Stanislaus County
LicensedWheelchairHospiceMemory care not on fileBedridden not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #507002509, held since 2003 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
3529 Forest Glenn Dr · Modesto, Stanislaus County
Phone
(209) 236-1900
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryVerified in record
Dementia / memory careNot on file — ask the home
Hospice careApproved for 10 residents
Bedridden careNot on file — ask the home

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER ALL MY BE NONAMBULATORY. FIRE CLEARANCE APPROVED FOR DELAYED EGRESS. MAY SERVE RESIDENTS WITH DEMENTIA. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 10 RESIDENTS AT ANY ONE TIME.State service designation981 - RCFE / DELAYEDthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 11 times and filed 10 documents. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on November 14, 2025 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Unsubstantiated.”

Most recent state visit
November 14, 2025
Occupancy at that visit
81 of 107 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 4 documents with transcribed findings, dated June 16, 2025 to November 14, 2025. 4 of the 4 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (3). 4 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 4 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 8 of 10 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20253 state visits · 5 documents
Nov 14, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not follow infections diseases plan properly Staff did not ensure residents room was cleaned/infected properly

On 11/14/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Arielle Pascua arrived unannounced to this facility to deliver complaint findings. LPA met with Facility Designated Administrator (FDA), Nicole Rodriguez and explained the purpose of the visit. Current census was 81. A brief interview with FDA Rodriguez was conducted. Allegation: Staff did not follow infection diseases plan properly. It was alleged that the facility staff did not follow infection disease plan properly. During the course of this investigation, the department conducted interview and records review. Based on interviews conducted, it was learned that on 08/04/2025, Resident 1 (R1) reported experiencing skin irritation over their entire body. During a follow-up appointment, the physician prescribed a topical cream to address the symptoms. Further information obtained from the physician indicated that the facility implemented its infection control policy. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 14, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250805101829
Nov 14, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff are not following doctors orders Facility staff are not allowing resident access to personal belongings Facility staff are not meeting residents groomings needs Resident contracted communicable disease while in care

On 11/14/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Arielle Pascua arrived unannounced to this facility to deliver complaint findings. LPA met with Facility Designated Administrator (FDA), Nicole Rodriguez and explained the purpose of the visit. Current census was 81. A brief interview with FDA Rodriguez was conducted. Allegation: Facility staff are not following doctors orders. It was alleged that facility staff are not following doctors orders. During the course of this investigation, LPA conducted interview and review facility records. Based on interviews conducted, it was learned that on 08/04/2025, R1 visited the doctor’s office to address a medication concern, which resulted in a contagious diagnosis. Upon returning to the facility, no additional information regarding the diagnosis was initially communicated to staff. The facility subsequently sought clarification from the physician to ensure proper protocols were implemented and that all medical orders were followed. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 14, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250820093721
Nov 14, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 25, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff mismanaged resident's medication Staff did not safeguard resident's personal items

On 08/25/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Arielle Pascua arrived unannounced to this facility to conduct a complaint visit. LPA met with Facility Designated Administrator (FDA), Nicole Rodgriuez and explained the purpose of the visit. The purpose of this visit to deliver complaint findings for the allegations above. Current census was 82. A brief interview with FDA Rodriguez was conducted. Allegation: Staff mismanaged resident's medication It was alleged that staff mismanaged resident's medication. During the course of this investigation, the department conducted interviews and reviewed facility records. Through staff interviews, it was determined that Resident 1 (R1) frequently experienced medical conditions that could impair their ability to understand the medications being administered. A review of the resident's records further confirmed that R1's diagnosis may contribute to confusion regarding their medications. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 25, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250711131606
Jun 16, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not dispense medication to resident as prescribed.

On 06/16/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Arielle Pascua arrived unannounced to this facility to conduct a complaint visit. LPA was met by Facility Designated Administrator (FDA), Nicole Rodriguez and explained the purpose of the visit. The purpose of this visit was to deliver complaint findings for the allegations above. Current census was 80. A brief interview with FDA Rodriguez was conducted. Allegation: Staff did not dispense medication to resident as prescribed. It was alleged that staff failed to administer medication to a resident (R1) as prescribed. During the investigation, the Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) conducted staff interviews and reviewed facility records. According to staff interviews, on January 26, 2025, R1 contacted the facility to report they would be late in returning for their scheduled medication. Upon R1’s return, facility staff declined to administer the medication, citing that more than one hour had passed since the scheduled time. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 16, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250128085931
20242 state visits · 2 documents
Nov 25, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 24, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20231 state visit · 1 document
Nov 15, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations0typical 1
Type B citations1typical 1
Substantiated complaints1typical 2
Total complaints4typical 7
State visits on file11typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2003.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20253512024220202311020221102021110
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$3,500$5,500 /mo
our estimate — Stanislaus County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
Ask how the 2025 complaint investigation report was corrected — what changed?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (209) 236-1900

Is Stratford At Beyer Park, The licensed?

Yes — Stratford At Beyer Park, The is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Modesto (Stanislaus County): California license #507002509, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 107 residents. State records list 10 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated November 14, 2025, was marked “Unsubstantiated” by the state.

Can Stratford At Beyer Park, The care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Stratford At Beyer Park, The with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory and hospice care; it does not list dementia / memory care and bedridden. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER ALL MY BE NONAMBULATORY. FIRE CLEARANCE APPROVED FOR DELAYED EGRESS. MAY SERVE RESIDENTS WITH DEMENTIA. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 10 RESIDENTS AT ANY ONE TIME.

How much does Stratford At Beyer Park, The cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Stratford At Beyer Park, The's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Stanislaus County typically runs $3,500–$5,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $3,000–$5,000/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Stratford At Beyer Park, The accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Stratford At Beyer Park, The is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

81 of 107 beds occupied (76%) when the state visited on November 14, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Stratford At Beyer Park, The?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 11 state visits and 10 dated documents since 2021 for Stratford At Beyer Park, The; 4 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated November 14, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

4 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not follow infections diseases plan properly Staff did not ensure residents room was cleaned/infected properly
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 11/14/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Arielle Pascua arrived unannounced to this facility to deliver complaint findings. LPA met with Facility Designated Administrator (FDA), Nicole Rodriguez and explained the purpose of the visit. Current census was 81. A brief interview with FDA Rodriguez was conducted. Allegation: Staff did not follow infection diseases plan properly. It was alleged that the facility staff did not follow infection disease plan properly. During the course of this investigation, the department conducted interview and records review. Based on interviews conducted, it was learned that on 08/04/2025, Resident 1 (R1) reported experiencing skin irritation over their entire body. During a follow-up appointment, the physician prescribed a topical cream to address the symptoms. Further information obtained from the physician indicated that the facility implemented its infection control policy. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, November 14, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250805101829
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff are not following doctors orders Facility staff are not allowing resident access to personal belongings Facility staff are not meeting residents groomings needs Resident contracted communicable disease while in care
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 11/14/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Arielle Pascua arrived unannounced to this facility to deliver complaint findings. LPA met with Facility Designated Administrator (FDA), Nicole Rodriguez and explained the purpose of the visit. Current census was 81. A brief interview with FDA Rodriguez was conducted. Allegation: Facility staff are not following doctors orders. It was alleged that facility staff are not following doctors orders. During the course of this investigation, LPA conducted interview and review facility records. Based on interviews conducted, it was learned that on 08/04/2025, R1 visited the doctor’s office to address a medication concern, which resulted in a contagious diagnosis. Upon returning to the facility, no additional information regarding the diagnosis was initially communicated to staff. The facility subsequently sought clarification from the physician to ensure proper protocols were implemented and that all medical orders were followed. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, November 14, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250820093721
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff mismanaged resident's medication Staff did not safeguard resident's personal items
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 08/25/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Arielle Pascua arrived unannounced to this facility to conduct a complaint visit. LPA met with Facility Designated Administrator (FDA), Nicole Rodgriuez and explained the purpose of the visit. The purpose of this visit to deliver complaint findings for the allegations above. Current census was 82. A brief interview with FDA Rodriguez was conducted. Allegation: Staff mismanaged resident's medication It was alleged that staff mismanaged resident's medication. During the course of this investigation, the department conducted interviews and reviewed facility records. Through staff interviews, it was determined that Resident 1 (R1) frequently experienced medical conditions that could impair their ability to understand the medications being administered. A review of the resident's records further confirmed that R1's diagnosis may contribute to confusion regarding their medications. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, August 25, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250711131606
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not dispense medication to resident as prescribed.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On 06/16/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Arielle Pascua arrived unannounced to this facility to conduct a complaint visit. LPA was met by Facility Designated Administrator (FDA), Nicole Rodriguez and explained the purpose of the visit. The purpose of this visit was to deliver complaint findings for the allegations above. Current census was 80. A brief interview with FDA Rodriguez was conducted. Allegation: Staff did not dispense medication to resident as prescribed. It was alleged that staff failed to administer medication to a resident (R1) as prescribed. During the investigation, the Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) conducted staff interviews and reviewed facility records. According to staff interviews, on January 26, 2025, R1 contacted the facility to report they would be late in returning for their scheduled medication. Upon R1’s return, facility staff declined to administer the medication, citing that more than one hour had passed since the scheduled time. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, June 16, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250128085931

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 11 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
0
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
1
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
1
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
4
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
11
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(209) 236-1900
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Stratford At Beyer Park, The? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.