Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Morning Star Care Home

Small home·Licensed for 6·Modesto, California

Licensed since 2023Licence #502701313
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · DementiaState licensing record · September 27, 2026
  • Estimated starting rate$3,600 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $2,950–$4,450
  • Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit5 of 6 beds occupiedMay 28, 2026 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitMay 28, 2026CDSS inspection record

Morning Star Care Home is a small care home in Modesto — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents since 2023. Hospice care and bedridden care are not on file.

Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Morning Star Care Home

Is Morning Star Care Home licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

How many residents is Morning Star Care Home licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Has Morning Star Care Home been cited?

1 Type A and 0 Type B citation since 2023, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 9 state visits over the same years.

Is Morning Star Care Home still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Morning Star Care Home cost?

$3,600 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $2,950–$4,450. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 9 small homes and similar homes within 9 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 6 other homes of a similar licensed size in Modesto that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,000 to $4,900 a month, and the middle figure is $3,400 (n = 6 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Morning Star Care Home take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Morningstar Care Home LLC, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Encompass Health Rehabilitation Hospital of Modesto is 0.6 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Morning Star Care Home keep a resident on hospice?

Not on file — the state’s record does not list hospice care on this license. Ask: “Can a resident stay here on hospice, and under what conditions?”

Morning Star Care Home license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “MORNING STAR CARE HOME”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #502701313. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed to Morningstar Care Home LLC, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2023, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 9 state inspection visits since 2023, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 1 Type A and 0 Type B citation on file since 2023, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 9 state visits in that period.
  • 4 complaints and 1 substantiated allegation on file since 2023, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is May 28, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 6 residents
  • Dementia / memory careApproved by the state
  • Hospice careNot on file · ask the home
  • BedriddenNot on file · ask the home

State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR SIX(6) NON-AMBULATORY RESIDENTS. BEDROOM #3 AND BEDROOM #4 ARE SINGLE OCCUPANCY NON-AMBULATORY ROOMS. BEDROOM #1 AND #2 ARE DOUBLE OCCUPANCY NON-AMBULATORY ROOMS.

983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA

CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026

As needs change

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation on file

    Ask: “Can we read the dementia care disclosure and discuss how daily support works?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

4 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver not on file

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$3,600a month to start

Likely $2,950–$4,450

From 9 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$3,600a month

Likely $2,950–$4,650

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room
  • Starting monthly rate$3,600likely $2,950–$4,450

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 9 small homes and similar homes within 9 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $2,950–$4,650
$3,600
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $3,450–$7,900
$5,600
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 9 small homes and similar homes within 9 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

9 homes like this within 9 miles publish starting rates mostly between $2,850–$5,000.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 9 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 3408 Gatewood Drive, Modesto, CA 95355Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2023, the state has filed 8 documents for this home, and its records count 9 visits since 2023. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on May 28, 2026 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Unsubstantiated.”

On file since
2023
State visits
9
Most recent visit
May 28, 2026
Occupied at that visit
5 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 4 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated January 26, 2026 to May 28, 2026. 4 of the 4 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (3). 4 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 4 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations1typical 0
  • Type B citations0typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations1typical 0
  • Total complaints4typical 0

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2023.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated2026441202511020241102023220

The last 36 months — 7 of 8 documents

20264 state visits · 4 documents
May 28, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility is in disrepair

On 05/28/2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Arielle Pascua arrived unannounced to this facility to conduct a complaint visit. LPA Pascua met with Facility Designated Administrator (FDA), Kalven Goreal and explained the purpose of the visit. Current census was 5. 4 out 5 residents were observed in the common areas of the facility watching tv. A brief interview with FDA Goreal was conducted. It was alleged that the facility was in disrepair. On 04/13/2026, LPA Pascua was notified by the facility that floor and kitchen renovations would be taking place. LPA Pascua verified with FDA Goreal that the facility had a plan in place to ensure safe and comfortable accommodations for residents during the renovation process.During this visit, LPA Pascua toured the facility and observed that floor renovations were being conducted in each resident bedroom. It was verified that all bedroom flooring renovations would be completed by the end of the day on 05/28/2026. Unsubstantiated LPA Pascua also toured the facility restroom and confirmed that it was in working condition. Additionally, the facility had a sufficient food supply to meet residents’ needs and had been coordinating with outside resources to ensure all resident needs continued to be met throughout the renovation process. Based on the information gathered during the investigation, the facility was not found to be in disrepair. The facility is currently undergoing renovations and has followed the appropriate process to ensure the facility remains maintained and safe for residents. Based on statements obtained, records review and observations during the investigation process, LPA was unable to corroborate the allegations. The investigation revealed the preponderance of evidence standards have not been met; therefore, the above allegations are found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the complaint allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED means that although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation(s)occurred. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was provided to the facility at the end of this visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 28, 2026 · control 27-AS-20260527094853
Apr 13, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Due to staff neglect, resident died

On 04/13/2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Arielle Pascua arrived unannounced to this facility to deliver complaint findings for the allegation above. LPA Pascua met with Facility Designated Administrator (FDA), Kalven Goreal and explained the purpose of the visit. Current census was 4. A brief interview with FDA Goreal was conducted. It was alleged that due to staff neglect a resident died. During the course of this investigation, the department conducted interviews and reviewed facility records. Based on interviews conduced it was learned that R1 was admitted to hospice services due to a decline in health. R1 was obtaining hospice services for the months of February-March 2026 to be seen once a week. Unsubstantiated Furthermore, it was stated that R1 was declining in health such as reduced food intake from minimal to zero two weeks prior to the residents death. During this time hospice services increased their visits from once a week to twice a week. An interview with facility staff was conducted, it was denied by 3 facility staff that the facility neglected the resident resulting in their death. In addition, it was stated that there were no concerns regarding the residents while obtaining hospice services. Based on the information gathered, there is not sufficient information to prove that due to staff neglect the resident died. Based on statements obtained, records review and observations during the investigation process, LPA was unable to corroborate the allegations. The investigation revealed the preponderance of evidence standards have not been met; therefore, the above allegations are found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the complaint allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED means that although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation(s)occurred. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was provided to the facility at the end of this visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 13, 2026 · control 27-AS-20260313145900
Feb 5, 2026Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff yell at residents

On 02/05/2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Arielle Pascua arrived unannounced to this facility to deliver complaint findings. LPA Pascua met with Staff Member (SM), Cheyenne Hubbard. LPA Pascua ask SM Hubbard to contact the Facility Designated Administrator (FDA), Kalven Goreal to inform him that CCL was present. It was learned that FDA Goreal was unable to come to the facility. LPA Pascua spoke with FDA Goreal via telephone regarding today's visit and complaint findings. FDA Goreal appointed SM Hubbard to finish the visit with LPA Pascua. Current census was 5. It was alleged that staff yell at residents. During the course of this investigation, the department conducted interviews which revealed that, on one evening at the facility, two residents were seated at a dining table and helped themselves to two cookies. In response, the facility administrator approached the residents, raised his voice, and told them they were not allowed to take cookies due to hygiene concerns related to one of the residents. Furthermore, this incident was acknowledged by the administrator. Based on this information, the staff did yell at the residents. Substantiated As a result of this investigation, the department found the allegations to be SUBSTANTIATED - A finding that the complaint was Substantiated meant that the allegation was valid because the preponderance of the evidence standard had been met. The following deficiencies were cited on the following LIC 9099-D pursuant to Title 22 Rules and Regulations, Division 6 and Health and Safety Codes. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report and appeals rights was provided to the facility at the end of this visit. An interview with 5 residents were conducted. 1 out 5 residents was unable to complete the interview due to language barriers. 1 out 5 residents state that one time they did not find any staff at the facility. 3 out 5 residents state that there is always a staff member on site. Furthermore, a review of the facility’s payroll records and LIC500 shows that there are staff members on site at all hours of the day. Based on the information gathered, there is not sufficient evidence to prove that staff leave residents unattended. Allegation: Staff financially abuses residents It was alleged that the staff financially abuses residents. During the course of this investigation, the department conducted interviews and reviewed facility records. Based on interviews conducted with 4 staff. 4 out 4 staff members deny that they financially abuse residents or have witnessed any other staff members financially abuse the residents. 4 out 4 staff members state that they do take residents out of the facility for outings which the residents are able to pay for themselves but are not required to pay for them or others. An interview with an interview with 5 residents were conducted. 1 out 5 residents was unable to complete the interview due to language barriers. 4 out 5 residents state that the facility staff do not financially abuse them. Based on the information gathered, there is not sufficient evidence to prove that the facility staff financially abuse the residents in care. Allegation: Staff isolates resident It was alleged that the staff isolates residents. During the course of this investigation, the department conducted interviews. Based on interviews conducted with 4 staff. 4 out 4 staff deny that they isolate the residents. 4 out 4 staff report that it is encouraged that residents come out of their rooms to mingle with other residents, however not all residents would like to do that all the time. An interview with 5 residents was conducted. 1 out 5 residents was unable to complete the interview due to language barriers. 4 out 5 residents deny that they have been isolated or have seen any other residents isolated. Based on the information gathered, there is not sufficient evidence to prove that the facility staff isolates residents. Allegation: Staff do not clean facility It was alleged that the staff do not clean facility. During the course of this investigation, LPA Pascua conducted a tour of the facility on 01/13/2026 and 1/26/2026. LPA Pascua toured the living areas, dining areas, restrooms, resident bedrooms, and other areas intended for resident use. During the LPAs visits it was observed to be maintained in a sanitary condition, surfaces were free of visible soil, debris, staining and residue. In addition, LPA Pascua reviewed and observed a cleaning routine schedule for each shift at the facility which indicate evidence of routine cleaning. Based on the information gathered, there is not sufficient evidence to prove that staff do not clean the facility. Based on statements obtained, records review and observations during the investigation process, LPA was unable to corroborate the allegations. The investigation revealed the preponderance of evidence standards have not been met; therefore, the above allegations are found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the complaint allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED means that although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation(s)occurred. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was provided to the facility at the end of this visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 5, 2026 · control 27-AS-20260105104114

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87468.1(a)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Feb 6, 2026

(1) To be accorded dignity in their personal relationships with staff, residents, and other persons. This is not met as evidenced by: The licensee did not comply with the section cited above by not ensuring that the residents were accorded with dignity in their personal relationship with staff. It was learned that the facility administrator raised his voice at the residents in care. This poses an immediate health, safety, and personal rights risks to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 5, 2026

Plan of correction: Facility Administrator stated that a review of the section will be conducted. A statement of correction, along with proof of staff training for no less than (1) hour in duration, for the cited section will be completed and submitted to the LPA's email at arielle.pascua@dss.ca.gov. by the due date. . Information submitted must include attendees, trainers, and information discussed.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87405(d)(5) · Plan of correction due date: Feb 6, 2026

(5) Good character and a continuing reputation of personal integrity. This is not met as evidenced by: The licensee did not comply with the section cited above by not ensuring that the administrator was of good character. This poses an immediate health, safety and personal rights risks to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 5, 2026

Plan of correction: Facility Administrator stated that a review of the section will be conducted. A statement of correction, along with proof of staff training for no less than (1) hour in duration, for the cited section will be completed and submitted to the LPA's email at arielle.pascua@dss.ca.gov. by the due date. . Information submitted must include attendees, trainers, and information discussed.

Jan 26, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff used marijuana during work hours, impairing their ability to provide adequate care and supervision, which presents a risk to clients in care

On 01/26/2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Arielle Pascua arrived unannounced to this facility to conduct a complaint visit. LPA met with Facility Designated Administrator (FDA), Kalven Goreal and explained the purpose of the visit. The purpose of this visit was to inform the facility and its representative that a complaint has been filed against it at this time. Current census was 5. A brief interview with FDA Goreal was conducted. It was alleged that staff used marijuana during work hours impairing their ability to provide adequate care and supervision. During the course of this visit, LPA conducted interviews and toured the facility. It was learned that the facility has a shed in which facility staff use to smoke. It was stated by facility staff that smoking is not near or around any residents in care. Facility staff state that smoking is not done during working hours and only late at night. In addition, an interview with outside parties and residents were conducted who denied that they have seen or smelled a staff smoking marijuana. Unsubstantiated LPA Pascua conducted a tour of the smoking area and did not observe any significant smell of marijuana in use. Based on the information gathered, there is not sufficient evidence to prove that the facility staff used marijuana during work hours, impairing their ability to provide adequate care and supervision, which presents a risk to clients in care. Based on statements obtained, records review and observations during the investigation process, LPA was unable to corroborate the allegations. The investigation revealed the preponderance of evidence standards have not been met; therefore, the above allegations are found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the complaint allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED means that although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation(s)occurred. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was provided to the facility at the end of this visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 26, 2026 · control 27-AS-20260120141022
20251 state visit · 1 document
Oct 7, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 10/07/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Arielle Pascua arrived unannounced to this facility to conduct an annual visit. LPA was greeted by Facility Designated Administrator (FDA), Kalven Goreal and explained the purpose of the visit. Current census was 4. A brief interview with FDA Goreal was conducted. This facility is licensed to serve and retain 6 non-ambulatory residents to resident in bedrooms 1 through 3. This facility also holds a dementia plan on file and a hospice waiver for 2. LPA Pascua reviewed 4 resident files and 3 staff files. The Facility Administrator has a current administrator certificate #7009180740 and expires on 12/23/2025. The fire extinguisher, located throughout the facility was serviced on 08/22/2025.Carbon Monoxide and fire alarms were present and in good repair. Common areas for resident use were toured. Furniture and furnishings were observed to be present and in compliance. A tour of the bathrooms was conducted. Hot water temperatures were taken to ensure that the hot water being dispensed was within the allowed range of 105-120 degrees at this time. Grab bars were present and functional. Resident bedrooms were toured. Furniture and furnishing were observed to be present and in good condition. A linen closet was located in the hallway. LPA observed a sufficient amount of linens at this time. The kitchen area was toured. Facility freezer and refrigerator showed to be functional and in compliance at this time. A tour of the pantry was conducted. LPA observed that there was a 7-day nonperishable food supply at this time. A tour of the garage was conducted. All cleaning supplies were locked and made inaccessible to residents at this time. The exterior of the physical plant was toured. Perimeter fence was observed to be stable and gates were in good repair. The following forms and documents were requested to be updated and submitted into CCL -LIC 308 -LIC 400 -LIC 500 -LIC 610 A technical advistory is being provided today for Sections 87412(a) and 87506(a). No deficiencies being cited during today's visit, an exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was provided to the facility at the end of this visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 7, 2025
20241 state visit · 1 document
Oct 29, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 10/29/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Arielle Pascua arrived unannounced to this facility to conduct an annual visit. LPA met with Facility Designated Administrator (FDA), Kalven Goreal and explained the purpose of the visit. Current census was 0. A brief interview with FDA Goreal was conducted. The administrator has an administrator certificate #6031018740. It was learned that there are currently no residents residing at the facility at this time. It was also learned that this facility is currently going though major renovations and will not obtain residents until renovations have been finished. LPA conducted a tour of the facility. It was observed that there are no other resident's in care. LPA discussed with FDA Goreal that prior to obtaining another residents in care the Licensee shall contact the LPA to conduct a tour of the facility to ensure that the facility is within compliance and is ready to obtain residents in care. In addition the following shall be completed: -Annual fees must be current and up to date. -No residents will be accepted unless the Department has been notified prior to admission -A mandatory reinspection must take place prior to accepting any residents -Licensee will remain available to the Department for contact by phone or email No deficiencies being cited during today's visit, an exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was provided to the facility at the end of this visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 29, 2024
20231 state visit · 1 document
Oct 3, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Prelicensing

On 10/03/2023, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Arielle Pascua arrived announced to conduct a Pre-Licensing Visit. LPA met with applicant, Kalven Goreal and explained the purpose of the visit. The facility intends to hold 6 elderly residents, all of which may be non-ambulatory. This facility has a dementia plan on file. Current census was 0. Facility Designated Administrator has a current and active certificate #6031018740 and expires on 12/23/2023. The fire extinguisher, located throughout the facility was serviced on 08/17/2023.Carbon Monoxide and fire alarms were present and in good repair. Common areas for resident use were toured. Furniture and furnishings were observed to be present and in compliance. A tour of the bathrooms was conducted. Hot water temperatures were taken to ensure that the hot water being dispensed was within the allowed range of 105-120 degrees at this time. Grab bars were present and functional. Resident bedrooms were toured. Furniture and furnishing were observed to be present and in good condition. A linen closet was located in the hallway. LPA observed a sufficient amount of linens at this time. The kitchen area was toured. Facility freezer and refrigerator showed to be functional and in compliance at this time. A tour of the pantry was conducted. LPA observed that there was a 7-day nonperishable food supply at this time. Garage area was toured. Laundry detergent and cleaning supplies were locked and made inaccessible at this time. This facility will be using a medication cabinet which was located in the kitchen. First aid kit was observed to be present and contained all of the required components at this time. Exterior grounds of this facility was toured. Perimeter fence and gates were observed to be functional and in good repair at this time. This facility has been observed to be in compliance at this time. There were no deficiencies observed during the course of this Pre-licensing visit. Applicant has already conducted Comp I and Comp II. Comp III was reviewed with applicant. Exit Interview was conducted and a copy of this report was provided to the applicant at the end of the visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 3, 2023
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in Stanislaus County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Stanislaus County