Healdsburg Senior Living Community is a residential care facility in Healdsburg, Sonoma County, California — state license #496803751, licensed for 82 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved June 12, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. No dated state inspection or complaint documents are on file for this home as of June 12, 2026.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

3 homes in view

Healdsburg Senior Living Community

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care facility · Large community, 82 residents · Healdsburg, CA · Sonoma County
LicensedWheelchair not on fileMemory care not on fileHospice not on fileBedridden not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #496803751 · read from the California state record on June 12, 2026 ·See on State Site →
725 Grove Street · Healdsburg, Sonoma County
Phone
(707) 433-4877
from the state licensing roster · June 12, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryNot on file — ask the home
Dementia / memory careNot on file — ask the home
Hospice careNot on file — ask the home
Bedridden careNot on file — ask the home

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

The state has filed 7 documents for this home.

Occupancy at the November 18, 2025 visit
39 of 82 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 7 documents with transcribed findings, dated September 19, 2023 to November 18, 2025. 7 of the 7 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (6), “Unsubstantiated” (1). 7 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 7 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 7 of 7 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20254 state visits · 5 documents
Nov 18, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Due to lack of staff resident sustained a pressure injury

At approximately 8:50 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Robert Frank arrived unannounced to deliver Complaint findings regarding the above allegations and met with facility back up Administrator Shauna Burton. During the course of the investigation LPA conducted multiple facility visits, conducted interviews, collected and reviewed documents. Complaint alleges that due to lack of staff resident sustained a pressure injury. The facility has five (5) levels of care for Assisted Living with level one (1) being the least amount of care and level five (5) being the highest level of care. The facility conducted Resident Assessments of resident R1 on 12/1/2024 and on 5/14/2025. Both assessments of R1 stated that R1 requires level five (5) care. Continued on 9099-C... Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 18, 2025 · control 21-AS-20250808144348
Oct 30, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff did not follow residents care plan Facility staff did not meet residents care needs

At approximately 8:40 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Robert Frank arrived unannounced to deliver Complaint findings regarding the above allegations and met with facility Administrator Brandee Rodriguez. During the course of the investigation LPA conducted multiple facility visits, conducted interviews, collected and reviewed documents. Complaint alleges staff did not follow the resident’s care plan and that the staff did not meet the resident’s care needs. The facility has five (5) levels of care for Assisted Living with level one (1) being the least amount of care and level five (5) being the highest level of care. The facility conducted Resident Assessments of resident R1 on 12/1/2024 and on 5/14/2025. Both assessments of R1 stated that R1 requires level five (5) care. The Needs and Services Plans (NSP), reflective of the previously noted assessments, states that R1 requires “Total Assist” for Bathing, Grooming, Dressing and Ambulation. Continued on 9099-C... Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 30, 2025 · control 21-AS-20250808144348
Jul 24, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Inadequate Staffing

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Robert Frank arrived unannounced to deliver findings regarding the above allegation and met with facility Administrator Brandee Rodriguez. Complaint alleges the facility does not have adequate staffing to meet the needs of residents in care. Complainant states that only one direct care provider is scheduled per shift in Memory Care Building 2 and Assisted Living, but the care needs of residents require at least two (2) staff be present, as some residents require a two (2) person assist and some resident’s behaviors require at least two (2) staff members, as one (1) staff member is needed solely for the purpose of redirecting the residents with disruptive and or aggressive behaviors. Continued on 9099-C... Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 24, 2025 · control 21-AS-20250625095039
Jul 24, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Licensee does not ensure sufficient staffing is provided resulting in a lack of supervision for residents in care

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Robert Frank and arrived unannounced to initiate a Complaint Investigation and deliver findings regarding the above allegation and met with facility Administrator Brandee Rodriguez. Complaint alleges the facility does not have adequate staffing to meet the needs of residents in care. Complainant states that only one direct care provider is scheduled per shift in Memory Care Building 2 and Assisted Living, but the care needs of residents require at least two (2) staff be present, as some residents require a two (2) person assist and some resident’s behaviors require at least two (2) staff members, as one (1) staff member is needed solely for the purpose of redirecting the residents with disruptive and or aggressive behaviors. The same allegation of Inadequate Staffing was filed with Community Care Licensing on 6/25/2025. This same allegation on complaint control #21-AS-20250625095039 was found to be substantiated and a citation was issued. As such, this cthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 24, 2025 · control 21-AS-20250714081523
May 6, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility does not have adequate staffing to meet the needs of residents in care.

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Robert Frank and Christi Coppo arrived unannounced to initiate a Complaint Investigation and deliver findings regarding the above allegation and met with facility Administrator Brandee Rodriguez. Complaint alleges facility does not have adequate staffing to meet the needs of residents in care. Complainant states that only one direct care provider is scheduled per shift, but the care needs of residents require at least two staff be present, as some residents require a two-person assist. During investigation, LPAs reviewed staff schedule for 5/6/25. LPAs observed that staffing for Memory Care buildings 1 and 2 (MC1)(MC2) is such that there are two caregivers scheduled with one Med Tech present. Review of schedule indicates that lunches are not scheduled such that they are staggered to ensure each Memory Care unit has two staff present at all times. Continued on 9099-C Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 6, 2025 · control 21-AS-20250501120816
20241 state visit · 1 document
Oct 16, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Licensee does not provide adequate or proper training Licensee does not ensure adequate staffing Personal Rights Residents needs are not being met

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Christi Coppo arrived unannounced to deliver findings regarding the above allegations and met with Jeralyn May, Administrator. Complaint alleges licensee does not provide adequate or proper training. Complainant states housekeeping personnel are doing caregiving duties without training. During investigation, seven [7] out of seven [7] staff interviewed state that housekeeping personnel are performing caregiving duties. On 7/12/2024, LPA observed staff identified as housekeeping to be working and providing care to residents in Memory Care building #1 (MC1). During investigation, LPA reviewed training records for seven [7] staff. Seven [7] out of seven [7] staff did not have current training or did not have the required amount of current training hours completed. Based on LPA’s observations, interviews, and record review, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 16, 2024 · control 21-AS-20240709101931
20231 state visit · 1 document
Sep 19, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not administer resident's medications as prescribed

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Victoria Bertozzi and Helena Rummonds arrived unannounced to conduct a complaint investigation regarding the above complaint and met with Administrator, Cinthya Gamino. Staff did not administer resident's medications as prescribed - Complaint alleges that facility gave incorrect medication and resident was sent to the Emergency Room. LPAs spoke with Administatrator who confirmed that resident, R1 was given another resident's medication in error. Following error, resident was sent to the Emergency Room but returned the same day without experiencing any adverse affects. LPAs reviewed facility incident report, chart notes and the discharge paperwrok from the hospital. Based on interview and review of documents, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation(s) is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, (Title 22, Division & Chapter number), are being cited on the attached LIC 9099D. Appeal rights givthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 19, 2023 · control 21-AS-20230913130434
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$6,000$9,000 /mo
our estimate — Sonoma County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

If end-of-life care were ever needed, could they stay here? What’s the plan?
Ask how the 2025 complaint investigation report was corrected — what changed?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (707) 433-4877

Is Healdsburg Senior Living Community licensed?

Yes — Healdsburg Senior Living Community is a licensed residential care facility in Healdsburg (Sonoma County): California license #496803751, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked June 12, 2026, licensed for 82 residents. No dated inspection documents appear in the copy of the state record we hold; the state's public site carries the complete history.

Can Healdsburg Senior Living Community care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked June 12, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked June 12, 2026 lists no specialized-care clearances for Healdsburg Senior Living Community (wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, hospice care, and bedridden are not on file). A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

How much does Healdsburg Senior Living Community cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Healdsburg Senior Living Community's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Sonoma County typically runs $6,000–$9,000/mo and small board-and-care homes $5,000–$8,000/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Healdsburg Senior Living Community accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Healdsburg Senior Living Community is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

39 of 82 beds occupied (48%) when the state visited on November 18, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Healdsburg Senior Living Community?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked June 12, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked June 12, 2026 for Healdsburg Senior Living Community includes 7 complaint-investigation narratives, transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated November 18, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Substantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

7 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedDue to lack of staff resident sustained a pressure injury
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
At approximately 8:50 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Robert Frank arrived unannounced to deliver Complaint findings regarding the above allegations and met with facility back up Administrator Shauna Burton. During the course of the investigation LPA conducted multiple facility visits, conducted interviews, collected and reviewed documents. Complaint alleges that due to lack of staff resident sustained a pressure injury. The facility has five (5) levels of care for Assisted Living with level one (1) being the least amount of care and level five (5) being the highest level of care. The facility conducted Resident Assessments of resident R1 on 12/1/2024 and on 5/14/2025. Both assessments of R1 stated that R1 requires level five (5) care. Continued on 9099-C... SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, November 18, 2025 · control 21-AS-20250808144348
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff did not follow residents care plan Facility staff did not meet residents care needs
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
At approximately 8:40 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Robert Frank arrived unannounced to deliver Complaint findings regarding the above allegations and met with facility Administrator Brandee Rodriguez. During the course of the investigation LPA conducted multiple facility visits, conducted interviews, collected and reviewed documents. Complaint alleges staff did not follow the resident’s care plan and that the staff did not meet the resident’s care needs. The facility has five (5) levels of care for Assisted Living with level one (1) being the least amount of care and level five (5) being the highest level of care. The facility conducted Resident Assessments of resident R1 on 12/1/2024 and on 5/14/2025. Both assessments of R1 stated that R1 requires level five (5) care. The Needs and Services Plans (NSP), reflective of the previously noted assessments, states that R1 requires “Total Assist” for Bathing, Grooming, Dressing and Ambulation. Continued on 9099-C... SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, October 30, 2025 · control 21-AS-20250808144348
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedInadequate Staffing
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Robert Frank arrived unannounced to deliver findings regarding the above allegation and met with facility Administrator Brandee Rodriguez. Complaint alleges the facility does not have adequate staffing to meet the needs of residents in care. Complainant states that only one direct care provider is scheduled per shift in Memory Care Building 2 and Assisted Living, but the care needs of residents require at least two (2) staff be present, as some residents require a two (2) person assist and some resident’s behaviors require at least two (2) staff members, as one (1) staff member is needed solely for the purpose of redirecting the residents with disruptive and or aggressive behaviors. Continued on 9099-C... SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, July 24, 2025 · control 21-AS-20250625095039
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLicensee does not ensure sufficient staffing is provided resulting in a lack of supervision for residents in care
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Robert Frank and arrived unannounced to initiate a Complaint Investigation and deliver findings regarding the above allegation and met with facility Administrator Brandee Rodriguez. Complaint alleges the facility does not have adequate staffing to meet the needs of residents in care. Complainant states that only one direct care provider is scheduled per shift in Memory Care Building 2 and Assisted Living, but the care needs of residents require at least two (2) staff be present, as some residents require a two (2) person assist and some resident’s behaviors require at least two (2) staff members, as one (1) staff member is needed solely for the purpose of redirecting the residents with disruptive and or aggressive behaviors. The same allegation of Inadequate Staffing was filed with Community Care Licensing on 6/25/2025. This same allegation on complaint control #21-AS-20250625095039 was found to be substantiated and a citation was issued. As such, this cCDSS inspection report, July 24, 2025 · control 21-AS-20250714081523
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility does not have adequate staffing to meet the needs of residents in care.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Robert Frank and Christi Coppo arrived unannounced to initiate a Complaint Investigation and deliver findings regarding the above allegation and met with facility Administrator Brandee Rodriguez. Complaint alleges facility does not have adequate staffing to meet the needs of residents in care. Complainant states that only one direct care provider is scheduled per shift, but the care needs of residents require at least two staff be present, as some residents require a two-person assist. During investigation, LPAs reviewed staff schedule for 5/6/25. LPAs observed that staffing for Memory Care buildings 1 and 2 (MC1)(MC2) is such that there are two caregivers scheduled with one Med Tech present. Review of schedule indicates that lunches are not scheduled such that they are staggered to ensure each Memory Care unit has two staff present at all times. Continued on 9099-C SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, May 6, 2025 · control 21-AS-20250501120816

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLicensee does not provide adequate or proper training Licensee does not ensure adequate staffing Personal Rights Residents needs are not being met
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Christi Coppo arrived unannounced to deliver findings regarding the above allegations and met with Jeralyn May, Administrator. Complaint alleges licensee does not provide adequate or proper training. Complainant states housekeeping personnel are doing caregiving duties without training. During investigation, seven [7] out of seven [7] staff interviewed state that housekeeping personnel are performing caregiving duties. On 7/12/2024, LPA observed staff identified as housekeeping to be working and providing care to residents in Memory Care building #1 (MC1). During investigation, LPA reviewed training records for seven [7] staff. Seven [7] out of seven [7] staff did not have current training or did not have the required amount of current training hours completed. Based on LPA’s observations, interviews, and record review, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of RegCDSS inspection report, October 16, 2024 · control 21-AS-20240709101931

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not administer resident's medications as prescribed
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Victoria Bertozzi and Helena Rummonds arrived unannounced to conduct a complaint investigation regarding the above complaint and met with Administrator, Cinthya Gamino. Staff did not administer resident's medications as prescribed - Complaint alleges that facility gave incorrect medication and resident was sent to the Emergency Room. LPAs spoke with Administatrator who confirmed that resident, R1 was given another resident's medication in error. Following error, resident was sent to the Emergency Room but returned the same day without experiencing any adverse affects. LPAs reviewed facility incident report, chart notes and the discharge paperwrok from the hospital. Based on interview and review of documents, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation(s) is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, (Title 22, Division & Chapter number), are being cited on the attached LIC 9099D. Appeal rights givCDSS inspection report, September 19, 2023 · control 21-AS-20230913130434

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked June 12, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged state visits for this home as of June 12, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
Not on file
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
Not on file
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
Not on file
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
Not on file
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
Not on file
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(707) 433-4877
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Healdsburg Senior Living Community? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.