Villa Toscana A Memory Care Community is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Mountain View, Santa Clara County, California — state license #435202919, licensed for 70 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 7 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2024, the most recent dated May 21, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

7 homes in view

Villa Toscana A Memory Care Community

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 70 residents · Mountain View, CA · Santa Clara County
LicensedWheelchairMemory careHospiceBedridden
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #435202919, held since 2024 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
939 W. El Camino Real · Mountain View, Santa Clara County
Phone
(707) 592-4252
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 70 residents
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careApproved for 15 residents
Bedridden careVerified in record

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 70 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 15 MAYBE BEDRIDDEN. WAIVER/GRANTED FOR HOSPICE CARE FOR 15.State service designation983 - RCFE / DEMENTIAthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2024, the state has visited this home 8 times and filed 7 documents. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on May 21, 2026 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Substantiated.”

Most recent state visit
July 14, 2026
Occupancy at the May 21, 2026 visit
40 of 70 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 3 documents with transcribed findings, dated December 30, 2025 to May 21, 2026. 3 of the 3 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (2). 3 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 3 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 7 of 7 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20262 state visits · 4 documents
May 21, 2026Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not prevent resident in care from leaving the facility without supervision

On May 21, 2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Murial Han conducted an unannounced visit to deliver the complaint investigation findings. LPA met with the administrator and explained the purpose of today's visit. Regarding to the allegation of – staff did not prevent resident in care from leaving the facility without supervision, there is no additional information forthcoming from the reporting party. However, during the initial reporting, the reporting party stated that resident in question (R1) resides in the memory care unit and on March 20, 2026 and March 28, 2026, R1 left the facility unattended and was found in a restaurant next to the facility and the 2nd time, R1 was found in the parking lot agitated. As part of the investigation, LPA interviewed staff members, conducted observations, and reviewed documents. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 21, 2026 · control 26-AS-20260330133147
May 21, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 21, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 24, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident’s call light is in disrepair.

On February 24, 2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Curley conducted an unannounced 10-day complaint visit. LPA met with Care Coordinator, Blanca Evia Del Puerto and explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation, resident's call light is in disrepair, according to the reporting party, on 2/9/26, during a facility visit, it was observed that a red cord was tied to extend the existing red cord in Resident 1's (R1's) room and when the reporting party pulled the cord, staff did not come. According to the reporting party, he/she was notified that it was an IT problem. As of 2/17/26, it was observed that R1's call light has not been resolved. During the investigation, LPA tested R1's call light, interviewed staff, and reviewed documentation. Based on observations, LPA observed R1's call light to be in good working condition. According to staff interviewed and documentation reviewed, after this issue was brought up to management, the facility immediately contacted theirthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 24, 2026 · control 26-AS-20260218092744
20252 state visits · 2 documents
Dec 30, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff do not ensure infection control guidelines are being followed Facility staff do not ensure food is of good quality for residents in care Staff neglect residents. Staff are forcing residents to participate in activities

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) David Marrufo conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit and met with Administrator MJ Jain. On 06/14/2024, the department received a complaint with the above allegations. On 06/20/2024, LPA Marrufo conducted an initial complaint investigation visit. On 09/12/2024 and 11/19/2025, LPA Marrufo conducted additional complaint investigation visits. Allegation: Facility staff do not ensure infection control guidelines are being followed When the department received the complaint, it was alleged that the facility did not have available COVID testing kits and that staff were not wearing Personal Protective Equipment (PPEs) when entering the living units of COVID-positive residents while they were being isolated. It was alleged that staff S1 became COVID-positive after entering one of the COVID-positive resident’s living unit without PPEs. See LIC9099-C pages for more information. Page 1 of 4. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 30, 2025 · control 26-AS-20240614094332
May 13, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20241 state visit · 1 document
May 2, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations2typical 1
Type B citations0typical 1
Substantiated complaints2typical 2
Total complaints3typical 7
State visits on file8typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2024.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202624120252202024110
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$6,000$9,000 /mo
our estimate — Santa Clara County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (707) 592-4252

Is Villa Toscana A Memory Care Community licensed?

Yes — Villa Toscana A Memory Care Community is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Mountain View (Santa Clara County): California license #435202919, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 70 residents. State records list 7 inspection and complaint documents since 2024; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated May 21, 2026, was marked “Substantiated” by the state.

Can Villa Toscana A Memory Care Community care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Villa Toscana A Memory Care Community with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, hospice care, and bedridden. Clearances describe what the license permits, not day-to-day staffing — confirm current scope and availability with the home directly on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 70 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 15 MAYBE BEDRIDDEN. WAIVER/GRANTED FOR HOSPICE CARE FOR 15.

How much does Villa Toscana A Memory Care Community cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Villa Toscana A Memory Care Community's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Santa Clara County typically runs $6,000–$9,000/mo and small board-and-care homes $5,000–$8,000/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Villa Toscana A Memory Care Community accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Villa Toscana A Memory Care Community is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

40 of 70 beds occupied (57%) when the state visited on May 21, 2026. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Villa Toscana A Memory Care Community?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 8 state visits and 7 dated documents since 2024 for Villa Toscana A Memory Care Community; 3 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated May 21, 2026, records an allegation the state marked “Substantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

3 transcribed reports on file

2026

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not prevent resident in care from leaving the facility without supervision
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On May 21, 2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Murial Han conducted an unannounced visit to deliver the complaint investigation findings. LPA met with the administrator and explained the purpose of today's visit. Regarding to the allegation of – staff did not prevent resident in care from leaving the facility without supervision, there is no additional information forthcoming from the reporting party. However, during the initial reporting, the reporting party stated that resident in question (R1) resides in the memory care unit and on March 20, 2026 and March 28, 2026, R1 left the facility unattended and was found in a restaurant next to the facility and the 2nd time, R1 was found in the parking lot agitated. As part of the investigation, LPA interviewed staff members, conducted observations, and reviewed documents. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, May 21, 2026 · control 26-AS-20260330133147
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident’s call light is in disrepair.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On February 24, 2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Curley conducted an unannounced 10-day complaint visit. LPA met with Care Coordinator, Blanca Evia Del Puerto and explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation, resident's call light is in disrepair, according to the reporting party, on 2/9/26, during a facility visit, it was observed that a red cord was tied to extend the existing red cord in Resident 1's (R1's) room and when the reporting party pulled the cord, staff did not come. According to the reporting party, he/she was notified that it was an IT problem. As of 2/17/26, it was observed that R1's call light has not been resolved. During the investigation, LPA tested R1's call light, interviewed staff, and reviewed documentation. Based on observations, LPA observed R1's call light to be in good working condition. According to staff interviewed and documentation reviewed, after this issue was brought up to management, the facility immediately contacted theirCDSS inspection report, February 24, 2026 · control 26-AS-20260218092744

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff do not ensure infection control guidelines are being followed Facility staff do not ensure food is of good quality for residents in care Staff neglect residents. Staff are forcing residents to participate in activities
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) David Marrufo conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit and met with Administrator MJ Jain. On 06/14/2024, the department received a complaint with the above allegations. On 06/20/2024, LPA Marrufo conducted an initial complaint investigation visit. On 09/12/2024 and 11/19/2025, LPA Marrufo conducted additional complaint investigation visits. Allegation: Facility staff do not ensure infection control guidelines are being followed When the department received the complaint, it was alleged that the facility did not have available COVID testing kits and that staff were not wearing Personal Protective Equipment (PPEs) when entering the living units of COVID-positive residents while they were being isolated. It was alleged that staff S1 became COVID-positive after entering one of the COVID-positive resident’s living unit without PPEs. See LIC9099-C pages for more information. Page 1 of 4. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, December 30, 2025 · control 26-AS-20240614094332

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 8 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
2
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
0
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
2
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
3
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
8
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(707) 592-4252
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Villa Toscana A Memory Care Community? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.