Family Feels Residential Care is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in San Jose, Santa Clara County, California — state license #435202897, licensed for 6 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 14 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2023, the most recent dated April 22, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

13 homes in view

Family Feels Residential Care

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Small home, 6 residents · San Jose, CA · Santa Clara County
LicensedWheelchairHospiceMemory care not on fileBedridden not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #435202897, held since 2023 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
781 Terrazo Dr · San Jose, Santa Clara County
Phone
(408) 224-6225
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryVerified in record
Dementia / memory careNot on file — ask the home
Hospice careVerified in record
Bedridden careNot on file — ask the home

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER; APPROVED FOR CAPACITY OF 6 OF WHICH 5 ARE NON-AMBULATORY AND 1 AMBULATORY; HOSPICE WAIVER APPROVED FOR 2 CLIENTSState service designation935 - ELDERLYthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2023, the state has visited this home 16 times and filed 14 documents. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on April 22, 2026 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Unsubstantiated.”

Most recent state visit
April 22, 2026
Occupancy at that visit
4 of 6 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 4 documents with transcribed findings, dated October 28, 2025 to April 22, 2026. 4 of the 4 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (2), “Unfounded” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (1). 4 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 4 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 14 of 14 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20264 state visits · 6 documents
Apr 22, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not ensure that facility was free of illegal drugs.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Maria (Mita) Partoza, conducted an unannounced visit to deliver the findings of the complaint investigation with the above allegation and met with administrator Philipp Perez. On 12/18/2025, the Department received the complaint that staff did not ensure the facility was free of illegal drugs. The Department conducted an investigation on 12/23/2025 and interviewed reporting party (RP), 3 staff (S1, S2, and S3), and 4 residents (R1, R2, R3, and R4) on 01/07/26 and 02/02/26 and requested for documents during the course of the investigation. page 1 of 2 continued to LIC 9099 C Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 22, 2026 · control 26-AS-20251218135439
Apr 22, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 7, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 20, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Facility has staff shortages resulting in delay in providing necessary services to meet the residents' needs.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Maria (Mita) Partoza conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver the findings for the above allegation and met with designated administrator (DADM) Philipp Perez. Administrator/Licensee Yiwen Shih and Juliet Pacaldo were not available during the time of the visit due to prior commitment. On 02/10/2026, the Department received a complaint with the above allegations. On 02/12/2026, LPA conducted an initial investigation and conducted an interview with 5 residents and 2 staff, requested copies of 3 out 5 resident medical assessment, appraisal needs and services plan and conducted an inspection of the facility. 5 resident bedroom, kitchen, dining, bathroom laundry room and exterior perimeter. See LIC9099C page 1 of 3 Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 20, 2026 · control 26-AS-20260210113828
Feb 20, 2026Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Unlawful Eviction

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Maria (Mita) Partoza conducted an unannounced visit to deliver the findings for a 2 Out of 3 complaint investigation. On 12/18/2025, the Department received a complaint regarding the above allegations. On 12/22/2025, the Department conducted an initial 10-day investigation visit, during which requested documents were obtained and interviews were conducted with four staff members (S1–S4) and three residents (R2–R4) out of the six residing at the facility. Two residents (R5 and R6) were not interviewed; R5 declined to participate, and R6 was resting at the time of the visit. Resident 1 (R1) was not present during the visit, as R1 had been hospitalized due to pain. After discharge, R1’s case manager (CM) placed R1 in a temporary shelter (motel) due to the fact that the licensee did not want R1 back at the facility. 1 of 3 Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 20, 2026 · control 26-AS-20251218135439
Jan 29, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20256 state visits · 6 documents
Dec 22, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 6, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 4, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 28, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff is financially abusing resident in care

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Manuel Monter arrived unannounced to deliver the finding for this complaint investigation. LPA met with Administrator designee Rita Garcia On 06/09/2025, the Department received the complaint alleging that the staff is financially abusing resident (R1) by asking R1 to lend them money. It was alleged that a staff asked R1 for $100.00 then paid it back, and another staff asked to loan $200.00 from R1. The reporting party (RP) stated that R1 could not say no and loaned staff the money and staff had not paid back R1 as of 06/09/2025. On 06/18/2025, the initial complaint investigation was conducted. Documents were obtained to include 6 residents physician's report, identification and emergency contact information, resident roster, LIC500, and 1 resident's admission agreement and appraisal/needs and services plan. Page 1 Out of 3. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 28, 2025 · control 26-AS-20250609082231
Oct 22, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 24, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20242 state visits · 2 documents
Jun 7, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 4, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations2typical 0
Type B citations1typical 0
Substantiated complaints2typical 0
Total complaints3typical 0
State visits on file16typical 6
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 5,773 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2023.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated2026461202566120242202023110
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$6,000$9,000 /mo
our estimate — Santa Clara County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
Ask how the 2026 complaint investigation report was corrected — what changed?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (408) 224-6225

Is Family Feels Residential Care licensed?

Yes — Family Feels Residential Care is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in San Jose (Santa Clara County): California license #435202897, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 6 residents. State records list 14 inspection and complaint documents since 2023; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated April 22, 2026, was marked “Unsubstantiated” by the state.

Can Family Feels Residential Care care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Family Feels Residential Care with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory and hospice care; it does not list dementia / memory care and bedridden. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER; APPROVED FOR CAPACITY OF 6 OF WHICH 5 ARE NON-AMBULATORY AND 1 AMBULATORY; HOSPICE WAIVER APPROVED FOR 2 CLIENTS

How much does Family Feels Residential Care cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Family Feels Residential Care's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Santa Clara County typically runs $6,000–$9,000/mo and small board-and-care homes $5,000–$8,000/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Family Feels Residential Care accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Family Feels Residential Care is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

4 of 6 beds occupied (67%) when the state visited on April 22, 2026. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Family Feels Residential Care?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 16 state visits and 14 dated documents since 2023 for Family Feels Residential Care; 4 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated April 22, 2026, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

4 transcribed reports on file

2026

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not ensure that facility was free of illegal drugs.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Maria (Mita) Partoza, conducted an unannounced visit to deliver the findings of the complaint investigation with the above allegation and met with administrator Philipp Perez. On 12/18/2025, the Department received the complaint that staff did not ensure the facility was free of illegal drugs. The Department conducted an investigation on 12/23/2025 and interviewed reporting party (RP), 3 staff (S1, S2, and S3), and 4 residents (R1, R2, R3, and R4) on 01/07/26 and 02/02/26 and requested for documents during the course of the investigation. page 1 of 2 continued to LIC 9099 C UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, April 22, 2026 · control 26-AS-20251218135439
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedFacility has staff shortages resulting in delay in providing necessary services to meet the residents' needs.
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Maria (Mita) Partoza conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver the findings for the above allegation and met with designated administrator (DADM) Philipp Perez. Administrator/Licensee Yiwen Shih and Juliet Pacaldo were not available during the time of the visit due to prior commitment. On 02/10/2026, the Department received a complaint with the above allegations. On 02/12/2026, LPA conducted an initial investigation and conducted an interview with 5 residents and 2 staff, requested copies of 3 out 5 resident medical assessment, appraisal needs and services plan and conducted an inspection of the facility. 5 resident bedroom, kitchen, dining, bathroom laundry room and exterior perimeter. See LIC9099C page 1 of 3 UnfoundedCDSS inspection report, February 20, 2026 · control 26-AS-20260210113828
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedUnlawful Eviction
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Maria (Mita) Partoza conducted an unannounced visit to deliver the findings for a 2 Out of 3 complaint investigation. On 12/18/2025, the Department received a complaint regarding the above allegations. On 12/22/2025, the Department conducted an initial 10-day investigation visit, during which requested documents were obtained and interviews were conducted with four staff members (S1–S4) and three residents (R2–R4) out of the six residing at the facility. Two residents (R5 and R6) were not interviewed; R5 declined to participate, and R6 was resting at the time of the visit. Resident 1 (R1) was not present during the visit, as R1 had been hospitalized due to pain. After discharge, R1’s case manager (CM) placed R1 in a temporary shelter (motel) due to the fact that the licensee did not want R1 back at the facility. 1 of 3 SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, February 20, 2026 · control 26-AS-20251218135439

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff is financially abusing resident in care
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Manuel Monter arrived unannounced to deliver the finding for this complaint investigation. LPA met with Administrator designee Rita Garcia On 06/09/2025, the Department received the complaint alleging that the staff is financially abusing resident (R1) by asking R1 to lend them money. It was alleged that a staff asked R1 for $100.00 then paid it back, and another staff asked to loan $200.00 from R1. The reporting party (RP) stated that R1 could not say no and loaned staff the money and staff had not paid back R1 as of 06/09/2025. On 06/18/2025, the initial complaint investigation was conducted. Documents were obtained to include 6 residents physician's report, identification and emergency contact information, resident roster, LIC500, and 1 resident's admission agreement and appraisal/needs and services plan. Page 1 Out of 3. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, October 28, 2025 · control 26-AS-20250609082231

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 16 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds), computed across all 5,773 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
2
typical for this size: 0
Type B citations
1
typical for this size: 0
Substantiated complaints
2
typical for this size: 0
Total complaints
3
typical for this size: 0
State visits on file
16
typical for this size: 6
See the full inspection record on the state's site →

Who runs Family Feels Residential Care?

From the CDSS ownership record, checked August 9, 2026.

Licensed to Family Feels Llc, who operates 3 licensed California homes in total. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.

Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(408) 224-6225
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Family Feels Residential Care? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.