Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Family Feels Residential Care 3

Small home·Licensed for 6·San Jose, California

Licensed since 2023Licence #435202894
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · HospiceState licensing record · September 27, 2026
  • Estimated starting rate$4,450 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $3,650–$5,450
  • Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit3 of 6 beds occupiedAugust 13, 2026 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitAugust 13, 2026CDSS inspection record
  • Licence holderFamily Feels LLCSince 2023 · 3 licensed homes

Family Feels Residential Care 3 is a small care home in San Jose — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents since 2023. Dementia care and bedridden care are not on file.

Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Family Feels Residential Care 3

Is Family Feels Residential Care 3 licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

How many residents is Family Feels Residential Care 3 licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Has Family Feels Residential Care 3 been cited?

0 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2023, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 9 state visits over the same years.

Is Family Feels Residential Care 3 still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Family Feels Residential Care 3 cost?

$4,450 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,650–$5,450. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 16 small homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 51 other homes of a similar licensed size in San Jose that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,525 to $4,875 a month, and the middle figure is $4,200 (n = 51 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Family Feels Residential Care 3 take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Family Feels LLC, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. See the homes licensed to Family Feels LLC — at least 3 on the state roster.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Kaiser Foundation Hospital-San Jose is 3 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Family Feels Residential Care 3 keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 6 residents, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Family Feels Residential Care 3 license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “FAMILY FEELS RESIDENTIAL CARE 3”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #435202894. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed to Family Feels LLC, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2023, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 9 state inspection visits since 2023, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2023, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 9 state visits in that period.
  • 1 complaint and 0 substantiated allegations on file since 2023, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is August 13, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 6 residents
  • Dementia / memory careNot on file · ask the home
  • Hospice careApproved · covers up to 6 residents
  • BedriddenNot on file · ask the home

State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 6 AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 6 MAY BE NON-AMBULATORY. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 6.

935 - ELDERLY

CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 6 — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

4 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation not on file

    Ask: “If memory loss develops, what would change — and when would a move be needed?”

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$4,450a month to start

Likely $3,650–$5,450

From 16 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$4,450a month

Likely $3,650–$5,650

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room

Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.

  • Starting monthly rate$4,450likely $3,650–$5,450

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 16 small homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $3,650–$5,650
$4,450
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,250–$8,800
$6,450
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 16 small homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

16 homes like this within 3 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,000–$4,500.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 16 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 770 Pronto Dr, San Jose, CA 95123Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2023, the state has filed 9 documents for this home, and its records count 9 visits since 2023. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on August 13, 2026 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Unfounded.”

On file since
2023
State visits
9
Most recent visit
August 13, 2026
Occupied at that visit
3 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 2 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated June 2, 2026 to August 13, 2026. 2 of the 2 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Unfounded” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (1). 2 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 2 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations0typical 0
  • Type B citations0typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations0typical 0
  • Total complaints1typical 0

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2023.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated2026350202511020241102023220

The last 36 months — 7 of 9 documents

20263 state visits · 5 documents
Aug 13, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff did not properly address pests in the facility resulting to infestation.

Amended report for the above allegation. Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Maria (Mita) Partoza, conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit and met with designated administrator (DADM) Philipp Perez. LPA stated the purpose of the visit. Licensee/Administrator (LIC/ADM) David Devries was not available at the time of the LPAs visit due to prior commitment. On 03/17/2026, the Department received a complaint with the above allegation(s). On 03/25/2026 the Department conducted an initial investigation visit t the facility and conducted interviews, inspection of the facility and requested for documents. page 1 of 2 Unfounded Amended Report - continued Allegation 2: Staff did not properly address pests in the facility resulting in infestation On 03/25/2026, LPA conducted a facility inspection. During the inspection, LPA observed cockroaches in the food pantry, Room #3, and the staff room. LPA did not observe spiders during the inspection. On 03/25/2026, LPA interviewed S1, S2, and S3. S1 stated pest-control services were performed on 03/24/2026 and reported that cockroaches may remain visible following treatment. S2 stated small cockroaches were observed after returning to employment on 02/02/2026 and reported pest-control treatment was performed. S2 stated spiders had not been observed and S2 was not aware of a resident sustaining a spider bite. S3 stated a resident reported observing a black spider but stated it is not a black widow spider, it was observed outside near the garden area and stated S3 was not aware of a resident sustaining a spider bite.On 03/26/2026, LPA received documentation indicating pest-control services were obtained on 01/29/2026, with treatment performed on 02/02/2026 and 03/24/2026. On 04/24/2026, W1 reported that R1 continued to report the presence of cockroaches and spiders within the facility and reported another resident had allegedly sustained a spider bite several years earlier. No documentation regarding the reported spider bite was provided to LPA. Based on interviews, observations, and records reviewed, R1 stated the phone remained in R1's possession. R1, W1, W2, S1, S2, and S3 did not provide information identifying an individual who used R1's phone. LPA observed cockroaches within the facility and reviewed documentation showing pest-control services were obtained on 01/29/2026, with treatment performed on 02/02/2026 and 03/24/2026. LPA reviewed R2's records and did not observe documentation indicating R2 sustained a spider bite or received hospital services related to a spider bite. This agency has investigated the complaint alleging staff did not properly address pests in the facility resulting in infestation. We have found that the complaint was unfounded, meaning that the allegation was false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. No deficiencies were cited during today's visit. A copy of the report was provided to DADM Philipp Perez.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 13, 2026 · control 26-AS-20260317093638
Aug 13, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Maria (Mita) Partoza conducted a Case Management to address the pest infestation identified during a Complaint Investigation and to amend the complaint report on 06/02/2026. LPA met with Designated Administrator (DADM) Philipp Perez and stated the purpose of the visit. On 03/25/2026, the Department received a complaint alleging that facility staff did not properly address pests, resulting in an infestation at the facility. During the course of the complaint investigation, LPA Partoza conducted a comprehensive review of facility operational and maintenance records. Documentation shows facility staff first observed a roach infestation in January 2026. Records confirm the facility took corrective action by scheduling professional pest treatments on 01/29/2026, 02/02/2026, and 03/24/2026, prior to the complaint being filed. The facility also entered into a one-year pest control service contract and provided monthly proof of ongoing treatments. During today’s visit, LPA observed no roaches. However, a regulatory non-compliance was identified regarding unusual incident reporting. Licensee did not not notify the Department of an active infestation—and that chemical treatments would increase daytime visibility of pests—the facility did not submit a written Unusual Incident Report (UIR) to the Department. Based on California Code of Regulations (CCR )Title 22, Section 87211(a)(1)(D), licensee is required to report any incident that threatens the welfare, safety, or health of residents. Deficiencies is cited during today's visit based (See LIC 809D) A copy of the report was provided to DADM Philipp Perez.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 13, 2026

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87211(a)(1)(D) · Plan of correction due date: Aug 28, 2026

87211 Reporting Requirements (a) Each licensee shall furnish to the licensing agency such reports as the Department may require, including, but not limited to, the following (D) Any incident which threatens the welfare, safety or health of any resident...this requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on records review, licensee did not submit a written Unusual Incident Report (UIR / LIC 624) and notify the Department of a known cockroach infestation observed in 01/2026, which pose/s a potential health safety and personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 13, 2026

Plan of correction: DADM stated that any incident that may affect resident health or safety, including pest infestations will be reported to the Department on a timely manner, staff will be trained in reporting requirement and corrections will be submitted to LPA on the POC due date of 08/28/2026

Jun 2, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not safeguard resident's belongings. Staff did not properly address pests in the facility resulting to infestation.

This report is being amended due to new information for the 2nd allegation. See new LIC9099 for the amended report. Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Maria (Mita) Partoza, conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit and met with designated administrator (DADM) Philipp Perez. LPA stated the purpose of the visit. Licensee/Administrator (LIC/ADM) David Devries was not available at the time of the LPAs visit due to prior commitment. On 03/17/2026, the Department received a complaint with the above allegation(s). On 03/25/2026 the Department conducted an initial investigation visit at the facility and conducted interviews, inspection of the facility and requested for documents. Unsubstantiated On 03/25/2026, LPA interviewed S1, S2, and S3. S1 stated pest-control services were performed on 03/24/2026 and reported that cockroaches may remain visible following treatment. S2 stated small cockroaches were observed after returning to employment on 02/02/2026 and reported pest-control treatment was performed. S2 stated spiders had not been observed and S2 was not aware of a resident sustaining a spider bite. S3 stated a resident reported observing a black spider but stated it is not a black widow spider, it was observed outside near the garden area and stated S3 was not aware of a resident sustaining a spider bite. On 03/26/2026, LPA received documentation indicating pest-control services were obtained on 01/29/2026, with treatment performed on 02/02/2026 and 03/24/2026. On 04/24/2026, W1 reported that R1 continued to report the presence of cockroaches and spiders within the facility and reported another resident had allegedly sustained a spider bite several years earlier. No documentation regarding the reported spider bite was provided to LPA. Based on interviews, observations, and records reviewed, R1 stated the phone remained in R1's possession. R1, W1, W2, S1, S2, and S3 did not provide information identifying an individual who used R1's phone. LPA observed cockroaches within the facility and reviewed documentation showing pest-control services were obtained on 01/29/2026, with treatment performed on 02/02/2026 and 03/24/2026. LPA reviewed R2's records and did not observe documentation indicating R2 sustained a spider bite or received hospital services related to a spider bite. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are unsubstantiated. No deficiencies were cited during today's visit based on the California Code of Regulations (CCR) Title 22. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of the report was provided to Designated Administrator (DADM) Philipp Perez. page 3 On 03/25/2026, LPA interviewed 3 staff (S1, S2, and S3). S1 stated that resident 1 (R1)'s cellular phone remained in R1's possession and stated that staff has their own cell phones and residents uses the house phone. S2 stated R1 previously had a cellular phone, reported the phone service was discontinued by a sibling, and stated R1 uses the facility telephone. S3 stated R1 previously had a cellular phone, reported the phone service was discontinued by a family member, and stated residents generally use the facility telephone. S2 and S3 stated they did not have information regarding the reported phone activity, and S3 stated no residents were observed using R1's cellular phone. S2 and S3 both stated they have their own cell phone. On 03/25/2026, LPA interviewed resident 1 (R1). R1 presented the cellular phone identified in the complaint and stated the phone remained in his/her possession. R1 stated the phone was used to communicate with family members, healthcare providers, government agencies, and financial institutions. R1 stated no staff or residents used the phone. R1 stated the increase involved usage minutes rather than additional calls and stated the telephone numbers on the device were familiar to R1. On 04/05/2026, 04/22/2026, and 04/24/2026, W1 reported concerns regarding increased phone activity and stated a phone carrier investigation remained pending. W1 did not provide documentation identifying unauthorized phone usage or the individual who allegedly used the phone. On 04/22/2026, LPA interviewed witness 2 (W2). W2 stated conversations with R1 may last one to two hours and did not identify an individual who allegedly used R1's phone. Allegation 2: Staff did not properly address pests in the facility resulting in infestation. -This allegation is being amended due to new information . See new LIC 9099. On 03/25/2026, LPA conducted a facility inspection. During the inspection, LPA observed cockroaches in the food pantry, Room #3, and the staff room. LPA did not observe spiders during the inspection. page 2the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 2, 2026 · control 26-AS-20260317093638
Jun 2, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Maria Partoza conducted an unannounced annual inspection and met with the Designated Administrator (DADM) Philipp Perez and stated the purpose of the visit. The facility is licensed to serve adults age 60 and over, 6 ambulatory of which 6 may be non-ambulatory and hospice waiver for 6. LPA observed 2 staff and 6 residents. Residents were in their respective rooms and resting at the time of the visit. 4 out of 6 was asleep and 1 out of 6 refused to be interviewed, and 1 out of 6 was outside smoking. LPA toured the facility, including common areas, resident rooms, kitchen, bathrooms, garage, and outdoor spaces. The kitchen was clean and organized; knives and chemicals were locked. Food supply met requirements (2 days perishable, 7 days non-perishable). Medications were locked and inaccessible to residents; first aid kit was complete. Fire, smoke, and carbon monoxide systems were operational; hallways were clear and well-lit. Kitchen and bathroom water temperature measured at 118.2°F. Bathrooms had grab bars and non-skid mats; resident rooms had adequate storage. Fire, smoke, and carbon monoxide systems were operational; hallways were clear and well-lit. The facility has room temperature of 84 degrees F. The facility is equipped with a fire extinguisher that was last inspected on 08/12/2025. Outdoor areas were free of hazards; laundry appliances were functional, and cleaning supplies were secured. LPA observed roaches inside one of the condiment cabinets. DADM stated that the fumigation process is ongoing and one is scheduled for 6/3/2026. DADM placed an industrial fan inside the facility to maintain room temperature at less then 85 degree F. LPA issued a technical assistance for 87303 Maintenance and Operation (b) A comfortable temperature for residents shall be maintained at all times. (2) The facility shall cool rooms to a comfortable range, between 78 degrees F (26 degrees C) and 85 degrees F (30 degrees C), or in areas of extreme heat to 30 degrees F less than the outside temperature. DADM stated that he/she have notified the licensee regarding the air conditioning system at the facility. LPA reviewed 3 out of 6 resident and 2 out of 2 staff records, including medication logs, admission agreements, care plans, personal and incidentals, health screenings, and staff training. All staff have required clearances and certifications. The facility conducts fire and earthquake drill quarterly for each shift. Last drill practice training was on conducted on 04/23/2026. No deficiencies were cited during today's visit based on the California Code of Regulations (CCR) Title 22. An exit interview was conducted with DADM and a copy Philipp Perez of the report was provided. end of report page 2 of 2the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 2, 2026
Mar 25, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies

On 03/25/2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Maria (Mita) Partoza conducted an unannounced visit to address a complaint that was filed with the Department on 03/17/2026. This case management is not part of the complaint. This case management - deficiencies is based on LPAs observation at the time of the visit. During the visit LPA was accompanied by the designated administrator Philipp Perez. Licensee/Administrator (LIC/ADM) David Devries is not available at the time of the visit due to prior commitment. The facility is licensed to serve adults age 60 and over with a capacity of 6, of which may be ambulatory and 6 may be non-ambulatory and a hospice waiver for 6. LPA conducted inspection inside and outside, including but not limited to the kitchen, dining area, 4 out 4 resident bedroom, 2 out 2 bathrooms, 1 staff room, exterior perimeters, and interior area of the facility. During inspection, LPA observed no tripping hazard on the hallways and emergency exits. LPA observed Arm and Hammer laundry detergent and Downy liquid cloth softener not locked in the laundry area that is located in the pass through from the inside towards the garage area and accessible to residents in care. S1 stated one of the resident likes to do their laundry at night that's why they leave the detergents inside the cabinet and not locked. LPA observed a steak knife that was not locked and is accessible to residents in care in the left corner drawer of the counter located in the kitchen. LPA observed the kitchen vent was covered with accumulated oil residue. page 1 of 2 see LIC 809C LPA observed the screen of the sliding door was frayed and has a hole that can fit a hand (Room #3). The facility has a side ramp and a ramp at the back to accommodate non-ambulatory individuals. The ramp's railing is not sturdy when touched lightly. LPA observed a green colored lighter on top of a table next to an frayed upholstered arm chair located at the back of the property by the exit sliding door. LPA observed frayed upholstered recliner next to the back ramp railing a chair that is broken next to the fence, and a power lifting press bench with frayed leatherette cover, cobwebs and rust. LPA inspected 5 bedrooms, 4 are for residents and 1 is for staff. 2 out of the 4 are shared and 2 are not shared. 1 out of the four has a bathroom and 1 shared bathroom in the hallway. The bathroom are equipped with grab bars and anti-slip mats. A sign that residents are not allowed in the garage is visible and door is kept closed and locked. LPA observed a carbon monoxide alarm system and a broken smoke alarm system at the entry hallway. The facility has 2 days of perishable food and 7 days of non-perishable foods. LPA observed a fire extinguisher that was last inspected on 08/12/2025 located near the kitchen, a dried pumpkin by the fireplace was also observed. LPA observed 3 out of 6 residents having breakfast on the dining table. LPA covered clear plastic container with each person's name written on a sticker. 2 out of 6 was asleep and 1 out of 6 was outside. When asked what is inside the clear container. The 3 residents and 2 out of 3 staff stated that the container is used for resident's medications. Staff 1 (S1) stated that the medications for breakfast are pre-poured or pre-prepared in the evening and given during breakfast. LPA reviewed 2 out of 2 staff record. 2 out of 2 staff have cleared criminal background and fingerprint record and are associated with the facility. 1 out 2 staff have a 1st Aid/CPR certification that will expire on June 08,2026. 1 out of 2 staff was recently hired and is currently in training. LPA reviewed 4 out of 6 resident record, the records were complete and up to date. Deficiencies are cited during today's case management - deficiencies based on California Code of Regulations (CCR) Title 22 See LIC 809D. An exit interview was conducted with designated administrator (DADM) Philipp Perez. A copy of the report and appeal's rights were provided. page 2 of 2 end of reportthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 25, 2026

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87309(a) · Plan of correction due date: Mar 26, 2026

87309 Storage Space and Access (a) Except as specified in subsection (b), the licensee shall ensure...cleaning solutions ...knives.. are in locked storage and are not left unattended if outside the locked storage. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on LPA observation during inspection, the LIC/ADM did not ensure that the Arm&Hammer laundry detergent, Downy Softener and steak knife are in locked storage and are not left unattended when not in use.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 25, 2026

Plan of correction: DADM, stated that he/she will ensure that LIC/ADM is aware of the deficiency and will have LIC/ADM submit a written plan of correction to address the deficiency regarding storage of laundry detergents and sharp objects by the POC due date of 03/26/2026.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR87303(a) · Plan of correction due date: Mar 26, 2026

87303 Maintenance & Operation (a)The facility shall be clean, safe, sanitary and in good repair at all times. Maintenance shall include provision of maintenance services and procedures for the safety and well-being of residents, employees and visitors. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on LPAs observation during facility inspection, LIC/ADM did not ensure that the facility is kept maintained by not addressing the following: back ramp rail sturdiness, frayed sliding door screen in room #3, kitchen vent is kept free from accumulated residue, smoke alarm isthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 25, 2026

Plan of correction: properly installed,upholstered furnitures, and excercise equipment that were placed outdoors are in good and usable condition. for the safety and well-being of residents, employees and visitors. DADM, stated that he/she will ensure that LIC/ADM is aware of the deficiency and will have LIC/ADM submit a written plan of correction to address the deficiency regarding maintenance of the facility by the POC due date of 03/26/2026.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87465(h)(5) · Plan of correction due date: Mar 26, 2026

87465 Incidental Medical and Dental Care (h) The following requirements shall apply to medications which are centrally stored:(5)Each resident's medication shall be stored in its originally received container. No medications shall be transferred between containers. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on LPAs observation and staff statement, resident's morning medications are pre-prepared the night before and given to residents in the morning during breakfast. The LIC/ADM did not ensure that resident's medication are stored in its original receivedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 25, 2026

Plan of correction: container and not transferred between container. DADM, stated that he/she will ensure that LIC/ADM is aware of the deficiency and will have LIC/ADM submit a written plan of correction to address the deficiency regarding transfering of medication between containers by the POC due date of 03/26/2026.

20251 state visit · 1 document
Jun 26, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 06/24/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jaime Vado conducted an unannounced annual inspection. LPA met with administrator Rita Garcia and explained the purpose of today's visit. There are 3 staff present, one being the administrator, and 6 residents present. This facility is licensed for ages 60 years and over. All may be non-ambulatory. Hospice waiver for 6. There are no residents on hospice at time of inspection. LPA was allowed entry into the facility. This is a single level facility. Annual fees are current. The physical plant was toured inside and outside to ensure the safety of the residents. LPA observed the facility kitchen which is clean and observed appliances are in good repair. Knives are stored and locked in the kitchen cabinet below the sink along with cleaning supplies. Medications are locked in a file cabinet in the main living room area. Perishable and non-perishable food items are observed as in place. There is an additional freezer and refrigerator, along with canned food supplies in the garage. First aid kit is observed as complete with required items. LPA observed fire extinguisher in the dining room with an inspection tag dated 08/09/24. The fire extinguisher is charged and within operable range, smoke detector/carbon monoxide detectors are observed in place through out the facility, and central heating/cooling system. There is a fire pull station located by the front door of the facility. PPE and additional food supplies are observed as in place. Continued on next page. Laundry area is also observed as fully operational located beneath the facility. Emergency exit routes are observed inside and outside to be free and clear of obstructions. Last emergency/disaster drill was conducted on 06/07/2025. Water temperature was measured at 120F in a common bathroom in the main hallway. Shower floor is observed to have non-skid flooring. LPA observed rooms at random and all appeared clean, free of odors, and contained all the required furniture per regulatory recommendations. Resident linen supplies are observed as in place. Oxygen signs are in place as needed. LPA reviewed 6 resident files and also reviewed 3 staff files on this day. Per resident files reviewed they are current with orders for bed rails. Per staff files reviewed all files. Staff have current first aid but no training records showing ongoing or continuing training. Client medications are inspected and are current including facility medication administration records. Administrator certificates are observed as current expiring on 01/05/2026. The following updated forms are requested to be submitted to CCLD by 07/03/2025: • Copy of updated Administrator Certificates • LIC308 Designation of responsible staff person • LIC610E Emergency Disaster Plan • LIC500 Staff Schedule • Copy of liability insurance Technical violations are given on this day on the attached LIC9102TV pages. Report is reviewed with Rita Garcia and a copy is provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 26, 2025
20241 state visit · 1 document
Jun 21, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 6/21/2024 at 1:20 p,m. Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Maria (Mita) Partoza conducted an unannounced required 1 year inspection and was met by Administrator (ADM) Rita Garcia and stated the purpose of the visit. The facility is a Residential Care Facility for the Elderly (RCFE) licensed to serve ages 60 and over, capacity for 6 ambulatory of which 6 may be non-ambulatory and 6 hospice waiver. The facility has 6 residents that have mental illness and neurocognitive impairment. 1 of 2 staff were present at the time of the visit. 6 residents were present at the facility. out of 6 is under the age of 60, 6 out of 6 are-ambulatory, 2 out of 6 have mild neurocognitive impairment. LPA and ADM toured the facility inside and outside, including but not limited to the following: Kitchen, dining, laundry, garage, 4 resident room, 1 staff room, 2 bathrooms, backyard and the exterior walkways. LPA observed the Personal Rights disclosure, Long Term Care Ombudsman (LTCO) and Centralized Complaint and Information Bureau (CCIB) of the CA Department of Social Services (CDSS) prominently posted on the wall, visible to visitors, resident and staff. The temperature inside the home was at 70 degrees F. LPA observed the kitchen to be organized, and sanitary with working appliances. Knives were kept in a secure locked area and not easily accessible to residents. The laundry area is located in the garage, cleaning supplies and laundry detergents are kept in a secure locked place not easily accessible to residents in care. The facility has 2 days of perishable food and 7 days of non-perishable food. page 1 of 2 (see LIC 809C) LPA inspected the residents' bedrooms and observed 4 out of 4 bedrooms have furniture and closet space for resident's personal belongings, bed frames with mattress and bed linens. 4 Out of 4 resident room is sanitary, organized and are free from debris. LPA observed that the bathroom floors were scrubbed and sanitized. LPA observed the shower curtain in one of the bathroom has brown residue at the bottom. ADM stated the shower curtain will be replaced. During the tour, LPA observed that Bedroom #4 vertical window blinds were in disrepair. The planks were taped and 3 of the planks were split in half and taped together. ADM stated the licensee will be notified that the vertical blinds needs replacement. LPA with ADM tested the water temperature for kitchen and bathrooms, water temperature was measured at 119.7 degree F. LPA with ADM inspected the laundry area and observed washer and dryer are in good working condition. LPA observed that the medication is in a locked cabinet. The facility has a first aid cabinet with first aid supplies and accessible to staff. The side door and sliding door to access the backyard opens easily and are free from obstruction. LPA observed ramps and walkways are free from obstruction. LPA observed the backyard area to be free from debris and is maintained. The facility is in a compound with two other facility under the same ownership. LPA reviewed facility record and 2 out of 2 staff record, and 3 out of 6 resident records. The disaster training conducted on 6/10/2024. Residents files were complete and updated. Residents' medications are labeled and current. Staff record were up to date with certification and training. LPA reviewed the facility resident roster and 2 out of 6 are under the age of 60. The facility did not submit an exception request and did not submit exception request licensing to admit and retain resident 2 (R2) who is under the age of 60. Deficiencies were cited during today's visit based on the California Code of Regulations (CCR) Title 22, see LIC 809D. An exit interview was conducted with administrator (ADM) Rita A Garcia. A copy of the report and appeals rights were provided. Page 2 of 2 end of reportthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 21, 2024
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Who holds the licence

Family Feels LLC, licensed since 2023, operates 3 licensed homes in California. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in Santa Clara County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Santa Clara County