Large community · Licensed for 74 · Saratoga
The Villas at Saratoga Skilled Nursing & Asst Lvg
20388 Saratoga Los Gatos Rd, Saratoga, CA 95070Licensed since 2019
Overview
No openings reported
- Approved by the state: Wheelchair · HospiceState licensing record · October 26, 2026
- Ways to pay: Medi-Cal ALW acceptedDHCS participant list · October 1, 2026
- Licensed for 74: a large care communityThe state license record
Ask this home
Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.
Care and support
- Wheelchairup to 74 residents
- Hospiceup to 10 residents
Not on file: dementia and bedridden approvals.
Approved by the state · State licensing record · October 26, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.
Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER; APPROVED FOR CAPACITY OF 74 NONAMBULATORY RESIDENTS; APPROVED HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 10 HOSPICE RESIDENTS.
935 - ELDERLY
CDSS record, verbatim · October 26, 2026
As needs change
Staying through hospice
Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 10 — care may continue at the end of life
State licensing record · October 26, 2026
We’ll ask for you. Not on file for The Villas at Saratoga Skilled Nursing & Asst Lvg: two-person transfers or a lift, who is awake overnight, help with medicines and care if memory loss develops. When we check availability, we ask about these too.
Check availabilityWhat it costs here
Covelight estimate
$3,450a month to start
Likely $2,700–$4,400
From 24 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file
Monthly cost breakdownWith a studio and basic help · room, care and fees$3,450likely a month
Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.
Starting monthly rate$3,450likely $2,700–$4,400
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 24 communities with 50 or more beds within 9 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600
Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (44 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).
One-time move-in fee$2,500one time · likely $0–$4,000
Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,500 (133 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.
- Likely monthly totalLikely $2,700–$4,600
- $3,450
- First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $3,300–$7,850
- $5,950
How people payOn the Medi-Cal waiver list · private pay, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
- MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
- Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
- Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home appears on the DHCS participation list, October 1, 2026. Confirm eligibility and current participation with the program. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board. On the waiver, a resident on SSI/SSP pays the home $1,444.07 a month for room and board.
- SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
- VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
- Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
Rates at nearby homes24 nearby homes publish starting rates of $4,200 to $12,285
24 homes like this within 9 miles publish starting rates mostly between $4,350–$7,200.
- Villa FontanaSan Jose · 3.0 mi · Large community$4,390Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Westgate VillaSan Jose · 3.1 mi · Large community$4,990Listed on Seniorly · assisted living · seen September 9, 2026
- Campbell VillageCampbell · 3.8 mi · Large community$4,200Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Merrill Gardens at CampbellCampbell · 4.9 mi · Large community$4,900Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Ivy Park at San TomasSan Jose · 4.9 mi · Large community$5,095Listed on its own website · studio apartments · seen October 27, 2026
- Sunny View Retirement CommunityCupertino · 5.0 mi · Large community$12,285Listed on its own website · seen October 5, 2026
- Belmont Village Los GatosSan Jose · 5.5 mi · Large community$7,525Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Belmont Village San JoseSan Jose · 6.1 mi · Large community$6,250Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Oakmont of San JoseSan Jose · 6.2 mi · Large community$6,495Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- The Watermark at San JoseSan Jose · 6.5 mi · Large community$4,995Listed on Seniorly · assisted living studio · seen September 9, 2026
- Sunrise of CupertinoSunnyvale · 6.6 mi · Large community$8,700Listed on its own website · studio · seen October 27, 2026
- Belmont Village SunnyvaleSunnyvale · 6.8 mi · Large community$7,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Atria Willow GlenSan Jose · 7.0 mi · Large community$4,495Listed on its own website · seen October 27, 2026
- Atria SunnyvaleSunnyvale · 7.1 mi · Large community$4,995Listed on its own website · seen October 27, 2026
- Merrill Gardens at Willow GlenSan Jose · 7.3 mi · Large community$4,500Listed on its own website · starting price for senior living · seen October 27, 2026
- Lincoln Glen Assisted Living CenterSan Jose · 7.5 mi · Large community$4,250Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Pacific GardensSanta Clara · 7.7 mi · Large community$5,275Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Sonnet HillSan Jose · 7.8 mi · Large community$5,250Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Sunrise of SunnyvaleSunnyvale · 8.2 mi · Large community$5,800Listed on its own website · studio · seen October 27, 2026
- Novelle Senior LivingSan Jose · 8.4 mi · Large community$4,995Listed on its own website · novelle begins at approximately · seen October 27, 2026
- Villa SienaMountain View · 8.4 mi · Large community$10,800Listed on its own website · assisted living studio · seen October 5, 2026
- Avella at AlmadenSan Jose · 8.5 mi · Large community$4,995Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Sunnyside GardensSunnyvale · 8.6 mi · Large community$5,200Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Marbella San JoseSan Jose · 8.9 mi · Large community$5,250Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 24 communities with 50 or more beds within 9 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
- Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
- Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
- Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
- Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
- We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
- It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
- The care level
Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.
- What is billed separately
Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.
- Move-in costs
A one-time move-in fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.
- Increases
California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.
An estimate for planning, not a quote. A home sets the price after hearing about the care needed.
Daily life
Daily life here is not on file yet, and that says nothing about the home.
The best way to see it is a visit.
Request a tourWhere it is
20388 Saratoga Los Gatos Rd, Saratoga, CA 95070Address from the public record · October 26, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.
Opening the neighborhood map…
- El Camino Health Los GatosHospital · General acute care, on the state’s list3.4 mi
Straight-line distances; check the drive or the walk. Hospital: the nearest general acute care hospital on the state’s list (CDPH, September 16, 2026).
Open directionsThe state record
California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
CDSS public record, read October 26, 2026 · License #435202710 · See the state’s own record
The last 36 months — 10 of 25 documents
Complaint outcomes in these 36 months, in the state’s words: 1 “Unsubstantiated” and 3 “Unfounded”.
20263 state visits · 3 documents
Sep 3, 2026Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitDeficiency page: Type B
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) David Marrufo conducted an unannounced annual inspection visit and met with Administrator Benjamin Roedel. During visit, LPA Marrufo toured the facility inside and out. LPA toured three out of three facility floors. LPA toured the hallway bathrooms on each floor as well as two resident apartment bathrooms on each floor. Each bathroom had working lights and available soap and paper towels. The resident apartment bathrooms had shower chairs and anti-slip floors. The water temperatures in the bathroom sinks measured from 114 F to 119 F. Each observed resident apartment had working lights and available bedding and clothing storage areas. LPA toured the outside areas and found the outdoor exits to be clear of obstructions. LPA toured the kitchen areas on the second and third floors as well as the dining areas. LPA Marrufo reviewed the fire drill log. The last drill was recorded on 08/12/2026. Maintenance Department records indicate the fire alarm system was last inspected on 07/21/2026. LPA reviewed 9 resident Centrally Stored Medication and Destruction Logs and found them to be complete. LPA reviewed 9 resident records. The following resident records were missing: R1's Admission Agreement and Safeguard of Property and Valuables form, R2's Appraisal/Needs and Services Plan, R3's Safeguard of Property and Valuables form, and R4's Admission Agreement. See LIC809-C page for more information. Page 1 of 2. LPA reviewed 7 staff records and found them to be complete. A deficiency was cited as per California Code of Regulations Title 22. See LIC809-D page for more information. LPA Marrufo requests that the following records be updated and copies sent to the department by 09/10/2026: LIC500 Personnel Summary LIC308 Designation of Administrative Responsibility Liability Insurance LIC610 Emergency Disaster Plan This report was reviewed with Administrator Benjamin Roedel and a copy of this report and appeal rights were provided. Page 2 of 2. END REPORTthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 3, 2026
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87506(a) · Plan of correction due date: Sep 10, 2026
87506 Resident Records (a) The licensee shall ensure that a separate, complete, and current record is maintained for each resident in the facility or in a central administrative location readily available to facility staff and to licensing agency staff. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Licensee did not ensure that the following resident records were not missing: R1's Admission Agreement and Safeguard of Property and Valuables, R2's Appraisal/Needs and Services Plan, R3's Safeguard of Property and Valuables, and R4's Admission Agreement, which poses a potential safety and personal rights risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 3, 2026
Plan of correction: Licensee agrees to submit copies of R1's Admission Agreement and Safeguard of Property and Valuables, R2's Appraisal/Needs and Services Plan, R3's Safeguard of Property and Valuables, and R4's Admission Agreement by 09/10/2026.
Aug 12, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff mismanaged resident’s medications Staff provided the resident with a broken chair resulting in a fall Staff interfered with the resident’s insurance coverage Staff did not safeguard resident’s personal items Staff did not treat resident with dignity and respect
On 8/12/2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Yi Sam Jian arrived unannounced for the purpose of conduct complaint investigation and was greeted by Administrator, Benjamin Roedel. Regarding the allegation that staff mismanaged the resident’s medications, the Department conducted an investigation. Due to conflicting statements provided by R1 and insufficient corroborating evidence, the investigation did not establish that the facility mismanaged R1’s medications. Regarding the allegation that staff provided R1 with a broken chair resulting in a fall, the evidence obtained is insufficient to establish that the facility failed to maintain the chair in a safe and good repair condition, resulting in R1’s fall. Regarding the allegation that staff interfered with R1’s insurance coverage, the facility provided information indicating that R1 was a private-pay resident and responsible for her own insurance coverage. There is insufficient evidence to establish that facility staff intentionally or improperly interfered with R1’s insurance coverage. CONT TO 9099C Unsubstantiated Regarding the allegation that staff did not safeguard R1’s personal belongings, R1 provided conflicting statements, and there is a lack of corroborating evidence. There is insufficient evidence identifying a staff member as having taken, misplaced, or otherwise failed to safeguard R1’s belongings. Regarding the allegation that staff did not treat R1 with dignity and respect, R1 and Staffs provided conflicting accounts regarding the statement allegedly made to the paramedics. There is no independent or corroborating evidence to establish that staffs treat R1 without dignity and respect. Although the above allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove whether the allegations did or did not occur, therefore the above allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. No Deficiencies cited under California Code of Regulations Title 22. Report is reviewed and a copy of this report is provided to the administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 12, 2026 · control 26-AS-20260429082422
Jan 9, 2026Facility evaluation reportCase Management - IncidentDeficiency page: Type A
Type of visit: Case Management - Incident
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) David Marrufo conducted an unannounced Case Management visit and met with Riley Tucker and Ben Roedel. The purpose of the visit was to respond to an Incident Report (IR) that the facility submitted to the department on 01/08/2026. The IR stated that on 12/31/2025 at around 9:00 AM, staff S1 was assisting resident R1 to the bathroom. S1 briefly left R1 in the bathroom to provide assistance to another resident. Before leaving R1, S1 told R1 to push the emergency call light inside the bathroom once R1 was done using the bathroom. When S1 returned, S1 found R1 sitting on the floor. S1 told S2, a medication technician, about R1's fall. S1 helped R1 back onto R1's wheelchair safely. S2 noted there was no injury to R1. S2 did not report R1's fall to S2's supervisors. During visit, LPA Marrufo obtained copies of R1's Physician's Report and Appraisal/Needs and Services Plan. R1's Physician's Report states R1 is not able to care for R1's own toileting needs. The Background Information section of R1's Appraisal/Needs and Services Plan states, "[R1] requires the help of one person to complete activities of daily living." The Functional Skills section of R1's Appraisal/Needs and Services Plan states, "Resident requires full assistance with all functional mobility and activities of daily living (ADLs), including bathing, dressing, toileting, feeding, and ambulation, due to physical limitations. Dependent on staff for transfers, repositioning, and mobility." See LIC809-C page for more information. Page 1 of 2. During visit, LPA Marrufo obtained a copy of S1's Corrective/Disciplinary Action Form, dated 01/06/2026. The Corrective/Disciplinary Action Form states, "On Dec. 31 around 9am while assisting the resident in the bathroom, caregiver briefly left because [he/she] was not yet finished and checked the resident in front of [redacted]. When the caregiver returned, [he/she] found the resident sitting on the bathroom floor and informed med tech immediately." The form was signed by S1 and S1's supervisor on 01/06/2026. During visit, LPA Marrufo interviewed R1 and S2. R1 stated during interview to have grabbed the grab bar in the bathroom when he/she fell to the bathroom floor. S2 stated during interview that care givers called S2 into R1's apartment. When S2 arrived, R1 had been positioned into R1's wheelchair near R1's bed. S2 stated to have forgotten to notify S2's supervisors about R1's fall. A deficiency was cited as per California Code of Regulations Title 22. See LIC809-D page for more information. An advisory note was issued. See LIC9102 for more information. This report was reviewed with Riley Tucker and Ben Roedel and a copy of this report and appeal rights were provided. Page 2 of 2. END REPORTthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 9, 2026
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87468.2(a)(4) · Plan of correction due date: Jan 10, 2026
87468.2 Additional Personal Rights of Residents in Privately Operated Facilities (a) In addition to the rights listed in Section 87468.1, Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities, residents in privately operated residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following personal rights: (4) To care, supervision, and services that meet their individual needs and are delivered by staff that are sufficient in numbers, qualifications, and competency to meet their needs. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Licensee did not ensure that resident R1 received the care, supervision, and services needed to meet R1's toileting needs when staff S1 assisted R1 to the bathroom, which poses an immediate personal rights and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 9, 2026
Plan of correction: Licensee agrees to submit a plan of correction by 01/10/2026 stating how the licensee will conduct in-service training with staff to ensure that resident receive the care, supervision, and services that meet their individual needs, including resident's toileting needs. Once training is completed, the licensee shall submit copies of training records, including names of staff trained, dates of training, training topics, and names and qualifications of trainers.
20253 state visits · 3 documents
Sep 18, 2025Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) David Marrufo conducted an unannounced Required 1 Year visit and met with Riley Tucker, Administrator. During visit, LPA Marrufo toured the facility inside and out. LPA toured the hallway bathrooms in the first and second floors. Each bathroom had working lights and available soap and paper towels. The water temperatures in the bathroom sinks were 109 F. LPA observed the first aid kit and found it to be complete. LPA tested the carbon monoxide detector and it functioned properly during testing. During visit, staff tested the smoke detection system and it functioned properly when tested. LPA toured the outside areas and observed the exits to be clear of obstructions. LPA reviewed seven resident Centrally Stored Medication and Destruction Records (CSMDR). Resident R1 was missing two medications in his/her CSMDR. LPA reviewed seven resident records and found them to be complete. LPA reviewed seven staff records. The records of staff S1-S5 were missing the LIC503 Health Screening form. S5 did not have a current first aid certification. The emergency disaster drill log indicates that the last drill occurred on 07/07/2025. See LIC809-C page for more information. Page 1 of 2. Deficiencies were cited as per California Code of Regulations Title 22. See LIC809-D pages for more information. LPA Marrufo requests that copies of the following documents be updated and sent to the department: LIC500 Personnel Report LIC308 Designation of Administrative Responsibility LIC610E Emergency Disaster Plan This report was reviewed with Administrator Riley Tucker and a copy of this report and appeal rights were provided. Page 2 of 2. END REPORTthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 18, 2025
Apr 4, 2025Facility evaluation reportCase Management - IncidentDeficiency page: Type A
Type of visit: Case Management - Incident
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) David Marrufo conducted an unannounced Case Management visit and met with Diane De Guzman, Administrator. The purpose of the visit was to follow up on an incident self-reported by the facility to the department via Unusual Injury/Incident Report (IR) on 03/22/2025. The incident occurred on 03/22/2025 and involved resident R1's bottle of medication M1 being reported as missing. The IR states that staff S1 was assisting R1 in the administration of R1's bottle of M1 around 10:00 AM. After completing medication rounds to residents in the facility, S1 left R1's bottle of M1 on top of the medication cart without securing the bottle of M1 inside the locked storage of the medication cart inside the medication room. S1 then proceeded to leave for S1's lunch break and does not recall if S1 locked the door to the medication room. At 2:00 PM, S1 was working with another medication technician to prepare the evening medications when both staff noticed that R1's bottle of M1 had gone missing. After searching the facility, S1 was unable to locate R1's bottle of M1 and notified the facility Administrator and Director of Staff Development. Law enforcement was notified and a police report was made. During visit, LPA Marrufo obtained a copy of the facility medication storage policy, R1's Admission Record, the Controlled Substance Accountability Sheet that was used for R1's bottle of M1 on the day it went missing, and Staff Schedule. See LIC809-C page for more information. Page 1 of 2. During visit, LPA Marrufo interviewed staff S1 and S3. During visit, LPA toured the medication room and observed there to be a surveillance camera installed that was aimed at the medication room door. Administrator De Guzman stated during visit that the camera was installed after the incident occurred. A deficiency was issued as per California Code of Regulations Title 22. See LIC809-D page for more information. This report was reviewed with Diane De Guzman, Administrator, and a copy of this report and appeal rights were provided. Page 2 of 2. END REPORT.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 4, 2025
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87465(h)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Apr 5, 2025
87465 Incidental Medical and Dental Care (h) The following requirements shall apply to medications which are centrally stored: (2) Centrally stored medicines shall be kept in a safe and locked place that is not accessible to persons other than employees responsible for the supervision of the centrally stored medication. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Licensee did not ensure that R1's bottle of medication M1 was kept in a safe and locked place, which poses an immediate safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 4, 2025
Plan of correction: Licensee agrees to submit a Plan of Correction by POC date stating how the licensee will ensure that resident medications are kept in a safe and locked place that is not accessible to persons other than employees responsible for the supervision of centrally stored medication.
Jan 9, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnfounded
Allegation investigated: Staff inappropriately touched a resident in care.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) David Marrufo conducted an unannounced initial complaint investigation visit and met with Josephine Almonte, Director of Staff Development. During visit, LPA Marrufo reviewed the facility resident roster. Based on review of the resident roster, the alleged victim of the allegation is not a resident in Assisted Living and is a resident in the Skilled Nursing portion of the facility. This agency has investigated the complaint allegation listed. Based on review of records, the CCLD has found that the complaint allegation is unfounded, meaning that the allegation was false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. This report was reviewed with Josephine Almonte and a copy of this report was provided. Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 9, 2025 · control 26-AS-20250108181141
20244 state visits · 4 documents
Sep 18, 2024Facility evaluation reportCase Management - Annual ContinuationReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Annual Continuation
On 9/18/2024 Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Maria (Mita) Partoza and Marcela Yanez, conducted an unannounced Annual Continuation inspection and met with Director of Staff Development (DSD) Josephine Almonte and Facility Registered Nurse (FRN) Analie Limosnero. At 10:15 a.m. LPAs continued to review the facility record for staff and residents. LPAs reviewed 5 out of 5 resident files. LPAs observed 2 out of 5 resident file needs LIC 602 (Physician's Report) updates and appraisal needs and services plan (LIC 625). DSD and FRN stated they have scheduled a meeting with family and Primary Care Physician (PCP) to update the record. Once updated DSD and FRN stated they will submit completed forms, LIC 625 and LIC 602 to LPA. At 11:40 a.m. LPAs reviewed 5 out of 5 Staff records and observed 1 out 5 staff records needs updating for education, however, S2 has a valid CNA license. LPAs discussed with DSD and FRN the importance of maintaining and updating staff records. LPAs observed that staff records have current training and current valid certification to provide care and supervision to residents in care. LPAs requested the following documents for CCLDs record updated, LIC 500, copy surety bond, copy of admission agreement and LIC 308 were provided. LPAs provided technical assistance for the maintenance/upkeep of residents and staff records. No deficiencies were cited during todays visit based on California Code of Regulation (CCR) Title 22. An exit interview was conducted with DSD Josephine Almonte and FRN Analie Limosnero. A copy of the report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 18, 2024
Sep 16, 2024Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Maria (Mita) Partoza conducted an unannounced required 1 year inspection visit and met with Director of Staff Development (DSD) Josephine Almonte. LPA stated the purpose of the visit. The facility is licensed to serve adults age 60 years and over; approved for capacity of 74 non-ambulatory, residents, approved hospice waiver for 10 hospice residents. At 2:30 pm LPA observed that residents were in the activity area lobby and most of the residents were participating. LPA toured the facility accompanied by the DSD. including but not limited to the kitchen, bathroom, dining room, living room, 5 of 34 residents rooms, and exterior walkways. The temperature inside the facility is at 74 degrees Fahrenheit. The facility is a 3 floor level building and each level has a medication room that is locked and not accessible to residents, a kitchen/kitchenette and dining room. The kitchen was observed to be sanitary and organized, knives and sharps were locked and not accessible to residents. LPA observed 2 days of perishable food and 7 days of non-perishable food. The water temperature measured at 113.7 degrees Fahrenheit to 114.2 degrees Fahrenheit. The bathroom/s are equipped with grab bars, and non-skid floors. Resident's room (R1 to R5) have sufficient storage and are kept sanitary and organized. Facility has housekeeping schedule for each floor and cleaning is done everyday for each resident's unit. page 1 of 2, see LIC 809c The ramps and patio are free from debris and obstruction. The facility were observed to be in good repair. The laundry is located on the 2rd level of the facility. The facility offers 2 times a week laundry services for free. The facility is equipped with a fire, smoke and carbon monoxide alert system and is maintained by their maintenance person. The hallway are free from obstruction. The fire extinguisher was inspected on 2/12/2024. LPA reviewed 5 out of 34 resident records such as but not limited to the centrally stored medication and destruction record (CSMDR), admission agreement, needs and services plan, health screening and observed that 5 out of 5 resident needs and services plan are not signed by the resident or the responsible party. 5 out of 5 Physician's Report (LIC 602) are not updated since the admission date. Due to insufficient time, LPA will return another day for the annual continuation. No deficiencies were cited per California Code of Regulations, Title 22. This report was reviewed with Director of Staff Development Josephine Almonte and a copy of the report was provided. page 2 of 2 end of reportthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 16, 2024
Aug 22, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnfounded
Allegation investigated: Staff handle resident in care in a rough manner.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Christine Dolores arrived unannounced to open the initial complaint investigation. LPA met with Administrator, Riley Tucker. During the investigation, it was found the allged resident (R1) resides in the skilled nursing facility, not in assisted living. LPA obtained and reviewed the resident roster for assisted living and skilled nursing to confirm. This complaint will be cross-reported to the California Department of Public Health. The Department has investigated the above allegation. Based on interview, record review and observation the above allegation is unfounded meaning the allegation is false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. No deficiencies were cited per California Code of Regulations, Title 22. This report was reviewed with Administrator, Riley Tucker and a copy of the report was provided. Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 22, 2024 · control 26-AS-20240813090952
May 2, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnfounded
Allegation investigated: Staff are not ensuring that the facility phone system is in working order.
On 5/2/24, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Grace Donato conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit. LPA met with the Director of Staff Development (DSD), Josephine Almonte & Administrator in Training (AIT), Josh Nabrotzky. LPA explained the purpose of today's visit. Regarding the allegation of staff are not ensuring that the facility phone system is in working order, reporting party (RP) stated that telephone service was not working December 15 through 17, 2022 and then on December. No one is answering the main facility number. LPA interviewed Administrator Travis Clawson and he stated that there wasn’t any disruption of phone services during this time. Aside from the phone numbers posted, the responsible parties know who else to contact if no one is answering the main line. LPA also interviewed AIT and it was mentioned that if there were issues like power outages, the facility uses an application called Clinic Connect where they can send updates straight to family members. DSD also mentioned that contact numbers of staff in the facility are provided to responsible parties upon moving in of a resident. LPA observed postings of phone numbers in bulletin boards and elevators whom family members or responsible parties can contact if the mainline is not available. There were also no incident reported of any outages during this time. Based on interviews, the department has determined that that the allegations were false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis, therefore the allegations are UNFOUNDED. Report is reviwed and copy is provided. Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 2, 2024 · control 26-AS-20221227113645
Earlier years2021 to 2023 · 15 documents
20233 state visits · 4 documents
Oct 10, 2023Facility evaluation reportCase Management - Annual ContinuationReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Annual Continuation
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Christine Dolores arrived unannounced to conduct the facility’s annual continuation visit from 10/04/2023. LPA met with Clinical Coordinator (CC), Karen Padilla. The facility has carbon monoxide detectors present throughout the facility. Activities calendar for the month observed posted in the common areas. On 10/04/2023, LPAs observed resident participating in activities such as church service and bingo. On 10/04/2023, LPA entered the kitchen area. The resident's meals are prepared in the facility's skilled nursing section and delivered to assisted living in a food warmer. LPA observed cups of fresh fruits in the assisted living refrigerator which were observed covered. On 10/04/2023, LPAs reviewed 5 resident records. During review of the residents centrally stored medication record (CSMR) it was found resident R2, R4, and R5's CSMRs were missing information. LPA observed R2 was missing 5 medications that were not written in their centrally stored medication record. CC followed-up with the pharmacy who then sent the updated CSMR with the 5 medications. R2's CSMR was missing start dates and refills information. R4's CSMR was missing start dates and refill number information. R5's PRN medication was not written in the CSMR. During today's visit, LPA observed and obtained the facility's in-service training record on medications that was conducted on 10/04/2023. On 10/04/2023, 4 residents and 3 staff were interviewed. The following documents were obtained: updated admission agreement, lease agreement, LLC, liability insurance, LIC-500, LIC-610E, and LIC-308. A deficiency was cited per California Code of Regulations, Title 22. See LIC809-D. This report was reviewed with Clinical Coordinator, Karen Padilla and a copy of the report and appeal rights were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 10, 2023
The state marks this report as 3 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 2. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
Oct 4, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnfounded
Allegation investigated: Staff left resident in soiled diapers while in care
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Christine Dolores and Davide Hailu arrived unannounced to open the initial complaint investigation. LPAs met with Administrator, Travis Clawson. On 09/27/2023, the Department recieved the complaint. On 10/04/2023, the initial complaint invesitgation was conducted. During visit, LPA reviewed the resident roster and observed the resident resides in the skilled nursing section of the facility. This complaint will be cross-reported to the California Department of Public Health. The Department has invesitgated the above allegation. Based on record review and interview, the above allegation is unfounded meaning the allegation is false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. This report was reviewed with Clinical Coordinator, Karen Padilla and a copy of the report was provided. Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 4, 2023 · control 26-AS-20230927124631
The state marks this report as 3 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 1. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
Oct 4, 2023Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Christine Dolores and Davide Hailu arrived unannounced to conduct the facility's Required - 1 Year. LPAs met with Administrator, Travis Clawson. During visit, LPAs toured the facility with Administrator to include the entrance, dining room, kitchen, resident bedrooms, bathrooms, offices, medication rooms, and exterior. All fire exit routes are free and clear of obstruction. Fire extinguishers last serviced on 02/10/2023. Hot water temperature maintained at 108 degrees Fahrenheit. Dining room area is equipped with cups, plates, utensils, and daily menus. Refrigerator temperature maintained at 35 degrees Fahrenheit. Freezer maintained at 0 degrees Fahrenheit. Resident bedrooms supplied with beds, adequate lighting, chair and closet. Bathrooms supplied with toilets, sinks, and showers. Showers equipped with grab bars and shower chairs. LPAs reviewed 5 resident records. Resident records contained physician's report, TB information, appraisal/needs and services plan, consent forms, identification and emergency information, personal rights, and centrally stored medications records. LPAs reviewed 5 staff files. Staff records contained 1st aid certification, job applications, health screening, TB information, and criminal record clearance. 3 out of 5 staff contained a 1st aid certification. Facility has an updated emergency disaster plan. Facility conducts their emergency disaster drills quarterly. Facility is equipped with an emergency disaster kit. First aid kit contains bandages, gauze, tweezers, and scissors. Due to insufficient time, LPA will return another day for the annual continuation. No deficiencies were cited per California Code of Regulations, Title 22. This report was reviewed with Clinical Coordinator, Karen Padilla and a copy of the report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 4, 2023
The state marks this report as 3 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 1. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
Apr 18, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnfounded
Allegation investigated: Facility staff handled resident in a rough manner Residents wounds aren't being treated properly
Licensing Program Analysts Ryker Heberle and Ravi Patel (LPAs) conducted an unannounced complaint investigation regarding the above allegations. LPAs met with facility Administrator Travis Clawson (Admin). During today’s visit, LPAs interviewed 1 staff member (Admin) and reviewed admission documents. Review of assisted living roster did not reflect admission of the alleged victim (R1). Admin confirmed that R1 has never been a resident of the facility’s assisted living wing but is currently a resident of the skilled nursing wing of the facility (SNF). During review of facility's admission records, LPA confirmed that R1 had no admission history in the facility's assisted living wing. Review of R1's admission record indicated that R1 has resided in the SNF wing of the facility for 6 months. Unfounded LPA confirmed that R1 was not and has never been a resident of the facility’s Assisted Living wing. This facility is a Residential Care Facility for the Elderly which contains both an Assisted Living (AL) and Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF). The SNF wing of the facility is not licensed by this department. SNF is regulated by the Department of Public Health. The Department has investigated the above allegations. Based on interviews conducted and documents reviewed, the Department found the above allegations to be UNFOUNDED, meaning that the allegations were false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. No deficiencies were cited during today’s visit. An exit interview was conducted with Travis Clawson, Administrator and a signed copy was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 18, 2023 · control 26-AS-20230412165806
20226 state visits · 7 documents
Sep 27, 2022Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst Ryker Heberle (LPA) conducted an unannounced annual inspection on 09/27/2022. LPA met with Administrator Travis Clawson (Admin). LPA entered the facility through the designated central point of entry and was screened by staff. Staff, residents in common areas, and visitors were observed to be wearing face coverings. Hand sanitizers, soap, and paper supplies were observed to be available. At least 30 days' supply of personal protective equipment (PPE) was observed to be available in the premises. LPA toured the with Admin facility. During the tour, LPA observed the temperature to be between 68*F and 78*F in resident bedrooms. Facility water temperature measured at 104.4*F. Fire extinguishers were observed to have been last inspected in February of 2022. Facility was observed to have at least 2 days worth of perishable and one week's supply of nonperishable food. All rooms were observed to be clean and well maintained. All emergency exits observed to be free from obstruction. No prohibited items noted in any resident rooms. The facility has reached a 100% COVID-19 vaccination rate for residents and staff. Smoke and carbon monoxide detectors were observed and confirmed to be operating properly. The facility's infectious control plan has been submitted and is currently under review by the department. No deficiencies were cited. Advisory note was issued. Exit interview conducted with Administrator Travis Clawson and a copy of this report was provided during visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 27, 2022
The state marks this report as 2 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 1. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
May 24, 2022Complaint investigation reportUnfounded
Allegation investigated: Resident's room heater is in disrepair Staff are not providing a safe environment for resident
Licensing Program Analysts Ryker Heberle and Mandeep Kaur (LPAs) conducted an unannounced visit to open an investigation regarding the above allegations. LPAs met with facility administrator Travis Clawson (Admin). During the inspection, LPAs interviewed 4 residents and 3 staff members, and reviewed facility files, including resident roster and 2 resident progress notes. In interview with Admin, Admin stated that there were currently no residents within the assisted living side of the building that have complained about the allegations listed above. In review of resident progress notes, it was indicated that the alleged victim (R1) had recently been transferred from the assisted living side of the facility to the skilled nursing side of the facility in response to a recent hospitalization. Instances of the above allegations were said to have occurred after R1's transfer to skilled nursing. Continued in 9099-C Unfounded LPAs toured the facility and interviewed 4 residents in their rooms. 2 out of 4 residents interviewed stated that the climate controls in their rooms function properly. 1 out of 4 residents stated that the climate controls break often, but that the facility staff always fixes them. 1 out of 4 residents stated that they did not feel like they knew enough to make a determination. 3 out of 4 residents interviewed stated that they believed the facility was providing a safe environment to live in, while 1 out of 4 stated that they did not feel like they knew enough to make a determination. This facility is a Residential Care Facility for the Elderly which contains both an Assisted Living Facility (AL) and Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF). SNF is regulated by the Department of Public Health. The Department has investigated the above allegations. Based on interviews conducted and documents reviewed, the Department found the above allegations to be UNFOUNDED, meaning that the allegations were false, could not have happened and/or are without a reasonable basis. No deficiencies were cited during today’s visit. Exit interview was conducted with Travis Clawson, Administrator and a copy of the signed report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 24, 2022 · control 26-AS-20220516144743
May 24, 2022Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Resident does not have phone service while in care.
Licensing Program Analysts Ryker Heberle and Mandeep Kaur (LPAs) conducted an unannounced visit to open an investigation regarding the above allegation. LPAs met with facility administrator Travis Clawson (Admin). During the inspection, LPAs interviewed 4 residents and 3 staff members (including Admin), and reviewed facility files, including resident roster and 2 resident progress notes. During interviews with Admin, Admin stated that the facility had recently been implementing a new phone system. The facility's IT team purchased and installed all of the new phones in the facility, the facility did not enlist the assistance of outside vendors. Admin stated that during the process of setting up the new phone system, some of the old phones at the facility ceased to function properly. Continued on 9099-C Unsubstantiated Admin stated that the new phones were installed one at a time inside resident rooms, and that when old phones ceased to function, they were replaced within a couple days. Admin stated that all CNA's on the facility floor had work phones that residents are allowed to borrow as needed, and that residents have alternate means of telecommunication in the event of personal phone outages. LPAs observed resident phones to currently be functioning properly. LPAs interviewed 4 residents at the facility. 2 out of 4 residents interviewed stated that they have never had issues with their phones. 1 out of 4 residents stated that they have their own cell phone, so they never need to use the facility provided phones. 1 out of 4 residents stated that they did not feel comfortable making a determination. In interviews with facility staff members, 2 out of 2 staff members stated that they always have a work phone when working CNA duties, 2 out of 2 staff stated that they allow residents to use their phones when requested. 2 out of 2 staff stated that in the event of residents not having phones that work, they can push their signals to summon staff to use their phones. The Department has investigated the above allegation. Based on interviews conducted, records reviewed, and LPAs' observations, the Department found the above allegation to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. An unsubstantiated finding indicates that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the allegation did or did not occur. Exit interview conducted with Administrator Travis Clawson and a copy of this report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 24, 2022 · control 26-AS-20220517165157
Apr 8, 2022Complaint investigation reportUnfounded
Allegation investigated: Resident was sexually abused
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Christine Dolores arrived unannounced to deliver the finding regarding the above allegation. LPA met with Karen Padilla, Clinical Coordinator. On 03/08/2022, LPA opened the 10-day complaint investigation and obtained the following documents to include staff roster and resident roster in assisted living and skilled nursing for the month of February to March 2022. On 03/09/2022, LPA received requested documents via email to include four resident’s physician reports, appraisal needs and services plan, and February staff schedule. Based on observation, interview and record review, alleged victim resided in the skilled nursing facility and was never a resident in assisted living. Victim does not currently reside at the skilled nursing facility and has moved out of state. Page 1 of 2. Unfounded Alleged perpetrator is a staff at the Skilled Nursing Facility and does not work or cross over to Assisted Living. S1 states the matter was investigated by a few outside agencies in February 2022, to include the California Department of Public Health, Law Enforcement, and the Ombudsman. The Department has investigated the above allegation. Based on interviews conducted and record reviewed, the Department found the above allegation to be UNFOUNDED, meaning that the allegation was false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. This report was reviewed with Karen Padilla, Clinical Coordinator and a copy of this report was provided. Page 2 of 2.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 8, 2022 · control 26-AS-20220307163913
Mar 22, 2022Complaint investigation reportUnfounded
Allegation investigated: Resident sustained severe pressure injuries while in care. Staff did not seek medical attention for resident in a timely manner. Staff did not feed resident. Resident lost a significant amount of weight. Staff did not ensure resident was taken to doctor's appointments.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Steve Chang conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit today. LPA met with administrator (ADM) Travis Clawson. LPA addressed the purpose of today's visit to ADM, and interviewed ADM. Resident rosters of Assisted Living Unit (AL) and Skilled Nursing Unit (SN) were obtained. Based on the interviews conducted and records reviewed, alleged resident resided in the skilled nursing unit never in AL, and does not live in the facility now. The Department found the above allegations to be UNFOUNDED meaning that the allegations were false, could not have happened and/or are without a reasonable basis. Exit interview was conducted with ADM. This report was provided to ADM for signature. Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 22, 2022 · control 26-AS-20220321124447
The state marks this report as 3 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 1. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
Mar 18, 2022Complaint investigation reportUnfounded
Allegation investigated: Facility staff not responding to residents call button. Staff left resident in soiled clothing. Staff left resident in soiled diaper.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Marybeth Donovan arrived unannounced to deliver the findings to the above allegations. LPA met with Travis Clawson Administrator. S1 was interviewed. S1 was not aware of any residents left in soiled clothing or diaper for a long period of time, and staff not responding to residents call button. W1 was interviewed. W1 stated concerns of neglect occurred when R1 was living in the skilled nursing facility. R1 was never a resident in assisted living. SN1 was interviewed. SN1 stated R1 was a resident in the skill nursing facility and R1 was never a resident in assisted living. Resident roster was reviewed and did not indicate R1 as a resident in assisted living. Page 1 of 2 Unfounded The Department has investigated the above allegations. Based on interviews conducted and documents reviewed, the Department found the above allegations to be UNFOUNDED, meaning that the allegations were false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. The report was reviewed with Travis Clawson and a copy of this report provided. Page 2 of 2the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 18, 2022 · control 26-AS-20201026105610
Mar 17, 2022Complaint investigation reportUnfounded
Allegation investigated: Staff hit a resident while in care
On 03/17/2022 at 01:44 pm, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ryker Heberle conducted an unannounced initial 10-day complaint investigation regarding the above allegation. LPA met with Travis Clawson, Administrator (Admin). During today’s visit, LPA interviewed 1 staff member (Admin) and requested documents. Admin stated that there have been no residents from Assisted Living that have complained about the allegation listed above. Admin confirmed that the alleged victim (R1) has never been a resident of the facility’s assisted living side but is a resident of the skilled nursing facility (SNF). -Continued, see LIC 9099-C. Unfounded During review of facility's admission records, LPA confirmed that R1 had no admission history in the facility's assisted living wing. LPA further confirmed via admission records that R1 had been residing in the skilled nursing wing of the facility for over 5 years. LPA confirmed that R1 was not and had never been a resident of the facility’s Assisted Living building. Suspected Abuser (SA) was also confirmed to not have worked in the assisted living facility. This facility is a Residential Care Facility for the Elderly which contains both an Assisted Living (AL) and Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF). SNF is regulated by the Department of Public Health. The Department has investigated the above allegation. Based on interviews conducted and documents reviewed, the Department found the above allegation to be UNFOUNDED, meaning that the allegation was false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. No deficiencies were cited during today’s visit. Exit interview was conducted with Travis Clawson, Administrator. This report was reviewed with Travis Clawson, Administrator, and a copy was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 17, 2022 · control 26-AS-20220310160836
20211 state visit · 4 documents
Jul 22, 2021Complaint investigation reportUnfounded
Allegation investigated: Unlawful eviction Staff hit resident Staff made inappropriate comments towards resident Facility has mold in showers Staff unlawfully opened residents mail Staff did not safeguard residents personal belongings Staff not meeting resident's needs
On 07/22/2021 at 12:45 pm, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Anna Bui conducted an unannounced initial 10-day complaint investigation visit for the above allegations. LPA met with Karen Padilla, Clinical Coordinator. During today’s visit, LPA interviewed 4 staff (S1-S4) and requested documents. 4 out of 4 staff stated there has been no residents from Assisted Living that has complained about the allegations listed above. 4 out of 4 staff confirmed the alleged victim (R1) has never been a resident of the facility’s Assisted Living (AL) side but is a resident of the Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF). S2 stated R1 was discharged from SNF to another acute care hospital. -Continued, see LIC 9099-C. Unfounded A review of the facility’s records confirmed the alleged victim (R1) was not a resident of the facility’s Assisted Living building. This facility is a Residential Care Facility for the Elderly, and this facility has both an Assisted Living (AL) and Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF). SNF is regulated by the Department of Public Health. The Department has investigated the above allegations. Based on interviews conducted and documents reviewed, the Department found the above allegations to be UNFOUNDED, meaning that the allegation was false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. No deficiencies were cited during today’s visit. Exit interview was conducted with Karen Padilla, Clinical Coordinator. This report was reviewed with Karen Padilla, Clinical Coordinator, and a copy was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 22, 2021 · control 26-AS-20210714094908
Jul 22, 2021Complaint investigation reportUnfounded
Allegation investigated: Staff did not seek medical attention for resident in a timely manner Staff are not providing adequate food service to resident Staff are not treating residents equally Staff are engaging in inappropriate behaviors with residents Staff dropped resident Staff are not properly quarantining residents
On 07/22/2021 at 12:45 pm, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Anna Bui conducted an unannounced initial 10-day complaint investigation visit for the above allegations. LPA met with Karen Padilla, Clinical Coordinator. During today’s visit, LPA interviewed 4 staff (S1-S4) and requested documents. 4 out of 4 staff stated there has been no residents from Assisted Living that has complained about the allegations listed above. 4 out of 4 staff confirmed the alleged victim (R1) has never been a resident of the facility’s Assisted Living (AL) side but is a resident of the Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF). S2 stated R1 was discharged from SNF to another acute care hospital. -Continued, see LIC 9099-C. Unfounded A review of the facility’s records confirmed the alleged victim (R1) was not a resident of the facility’s Assisted Living building. This facility is a Residential Care Facility for the Elderly, and this facility has both an Assisted Living (AL) and Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF). SNF is regulated by the Department of Public Health. The Department has investigated the above allegations. Based on interviews conducted and documents reviewed, the Department found the above allegations to be UNFOUNDED, meaning that the allegation was false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. No deficiencies were cited during today’s visit. Exit interview was conducted with Karen Padilla, Clinical Coordinator. This report was reviewed with Karen Padilla, Clinical Coordinator, and a copy was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 22, 2021 · control 26-AS-20210714100229
Jul 22, 2021Complaint investigation reportUnfounded
Allegation investigated: Lack of supervision resulting in resident's engaging in a physical altercation.
On 07/22/2021 at 12:20 pm, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Anna Bui conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit to the deliver the finding to the above allegation. LPA met with Karen Padilla, Clinical Coordinator. On 06/17/2021, an initial 10-day complaint investigation visit was conducted for the above allegation, and the Administrator and 1 staff (S1) was interviewed. The ADM and S1 both stated there has been no residents that had a physical altercation, and any issues were always brought up to staff and taken care of immediately. ADM and S1 stated staff are always available and there has been no issues with lack of supervision. On 06/17/2021, 4 residents were interviewed. 4 out of 4 residents stated staff are always around and available. 4 out of 4 residents stated they have not seen any residents get into a physical altercation with another resident. -Continued, see LIC 9099-C. Unfounded On 07/14/2021, 1 staff (S2) was interviewed. S2 confirmed there is no residents by the alleged victims’ names living on the Assisted Living side. A review of the facility’s records noted no residents by the names reported as the alleged victims. The Department has investigated the above allegation. Based on interviews conducted and document review, the Department found the above allegation to be UNFOUNDED, meaning that the allegation was false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. No deficiencies were cited during today’s visit. Exit interview was conducted with Karen Padilla, Clinical Coordinator. This report was reviewed with Karen Padilla, Clinical Coordinator, and a copy was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 22, 2021 · control 26-AS-20210610164056
Jul 22, 2021Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
On 07/22/2021 at 11:33 am, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Anna Bui conducted an unannounced Annual Required 1 Year visit. LPA met with Karen Padilla, Clinical Coordinator. LPA toured the facility beginning with the main entrance. The entrance had a thermometer, hand sanitizer, and sign-in log to document temperature and screening questions. Universal precautions, COVID-19 protocols, and social distancing guidelines were posted throughout the facility. Restrooms had hand soap and paper towels readily available. Hand washing sign was posted at all hand washing stations. Staff and residents were observed wearing a mask and following COVID-19 protocols. Facility observed to have adequate supply of PPE. No deficiencies were cited during today's visit. This report was reviewed with Karen Padilla, Clinical Coordinator, and a copy was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 22, 2021
46 of 74 beds were occupied at the August 12, 2026 state visit — a count on that day, not an opening.
License holder
Strands LLC, licensed since 2019.
The state’s totals for this licenseSince 2019, as the state’s facility page counts them
- State visits on file
- 21
- Total complaints
- 12
- Substantiated allegations
- 0
- Type A citations
- 0
- Type B citations
- 0
These are the state’s own totals for this license since 2019, per CDSS records. The state counts them apart from the documents above, and they can differ from what those documents show; the documents say what each visit found. One complaint can contain several allegations.
Compare with homes the same size
| This home | Typical | |
|---|---|---|
| Type A citations | 0 | 0 |
| Type B citations | 0 | 1 |
| Substantiated allegations | 0 | 2 |
| Total complaints | 12 | 6 |
“Typical” is the statewide median for licensed homes this size. It does not adjust for years licensed, and older licenses have had more visits and reports. The median is across the 1,354 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record. The figures compared are the state’s totals, not the documents.
What the state’s words mean
CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents stand in their place.
Frequently asked questions
A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
Quick answers about The Villas at Saratoga Skilled Nursing & Asst Lvg
Is The Villas at Saratoga Skilled Nursing & Asst Lvg licensed?
The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
How many residents is The Villas at Saratoga Skilled Nursing & Asst Lvg licensed for?
74 residents — a large community, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Has The Villas at Saratoga Skilled Nursing & Asst Lvg been cited?
0 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2019, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. Those records count 21 state visits over the same years.
Is The Villas at Saratoga Skilled Nursing & Asst Lvg still open?
This license was on the CDSS roster as of November 11, 2026.
What does The Villas at Saratoga Skilled Nursing & Asst Lvg cost?
$3,450 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $2,700–$4,400. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 24 communities with 50 or more beds within 9 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Among 38 other homes of a similar licensed size across Santa Clara County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,595 to $6,495 a month, and the middle figure is $5,250 (n = 38 other homes publishing a starting rate).
Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date between September and October 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.
A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.
The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.
A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.
Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out. What Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver covers in a care home.
Does The Villas at Saratoga Skilled Nursing & Asst Lvg take Medi-Cal?
On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home appears on the DHCS participation list, October 1, 2026. Confirm eligibility and current participation with the program. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Who holds the license?
The license is held by Strands LLC, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Is there a hospital nearby?
El Camino Health Los Gatos is 3.4 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.
Can The Villas at Saratoga Skilled Nursing & Asst Lvg keep a resident on hospice?
Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 10 residents, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
The Villas at Saratoga Skilled Nursing & Asst Lvg license and inspection record
- Name on the license: “VILLAS AT SARATOGA SKILLED NURSING & ASST LVG, THE”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
- License #435202710. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed for 74 residents — a large community, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed to Strands LLC, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- First licensed in 2019, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 21 state inspection visits since 2019, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 0 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2019, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. The same records count 21 state visits in that period.
- 12 complaints and 0 substantiated allegations on file since 2019, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
- The most recent state visit on file is October 19, 2026, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗
Nearby
Other homes nearby
Licensed homes near this one in Santa Clara County, most information on file first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.
- Map
Starting rate
$6,000 a month to start
Listed by the home on A Place for Mom · September 9, 2026On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,650 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,600–$5,900On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Starting rate
$4,000 a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Starting rate
$5,000 a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,450 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,450–$5,700On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$5,050 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,100–$6,200On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
Street maps © Protomaps · © OpenStreetMap
Explore Santa Clara County