Rose Garden Court is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in San Jose, Santa Clara County, California — state license #435200967, licensed for 30 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 19 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated December 1, 2025 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

2 homes in view

Rose Garden Court

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Mid-size home, 30 residents · San Jose, CA · Santa Clara County
LicensedWheelchairHospiceBedriddenMemory care not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #435200967, held since 2001 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
958 Vermont Street · San Jose, Santa Clara County
Phone
(408) 247-0815
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryVerified in record
Dementia / memory careNot on file — ask the home
Hospice careVerified in record
Bedridden careApproved for 13 residents

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGES 60 & ABOVE. 17 MAY BE NON-AMBULATORY AND 13 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN IN ROOM # 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, AND 15. THE HOSPICE WAIVER WITH THE TOTAL CARE ADDENDUM FOR 10 HAS BEEN APPROVED.State service designation935 - ELDERLYthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 20 times and filed 19 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated December 1, 2025.

Most recent state visit
December 1, 2025
Occupancy at the May 14, 2025 visit
12 of 30 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 3 documents with transcribed findings, dated May 14, 2024 to May 14, 2025. 3 of the 3 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Unfounded” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (2). 3 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 3 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 9 of 19 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20255 state visits · 6 documents
Dec 1, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 20, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 15, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 14, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not ensure that facility is free from insects or rodents.

THIS IS AN AMENDED REPORT. On 05/14/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Santino Fortes arrived to the facility unannounced to deliver the complaint investigation findings for the above allegation. LPA met with Licensee, Michael Roste. On 2/5/2025 the Department received a complaint with the above allegation. On 2/14/2025 the Department conducted the initial unannounced complaint investigation. LPA interviewed staff and residents. LPA conducted a facility file review. Based on observations, LPA inspected the facility inside and out to include resident rooms, common rooms, kitchen and food pantry. LPA did not observe any insects or pests. LPA interviewed 3 out of 3 staff (S1, S2, S3) who stated that they have not observed insects/pests in the facility and see exterminators periodically fumigating the facility. 5 out of 6 residents (R2, R3, R4, R5, R6) interviewed stated that they have not seen insects in the facility and see exterminators regularly fumigating the facility. See LIC9099-the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 14, 2025 · control 26-AS-20250205155405
Mar 26, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are not following a resident's dietary plan Staff are not assisting a resident with transferring from bed

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) David Marrufo conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit and met with Michael Rosete. On 10/07/2024, the department received a complaint with the above allegations. On 10/11/2024, LPAs Fortes and Marrufo conducted an initial complaint investigation visit. LPA Marrufo obtained a copy of the Resident Roster, which indicates that R1 was admitted to the facility on 08/09/2024. LPA Marrufo obtained a copy of R1’s Physician’s Report, which is dated 07/30/2024. R1’s Physician’s Report has neither the “Yes” nor “No” columns checked in the row indicating if R1 has a special diet. The “Able to Feed Self” row is checked “No” and has the comment, “requires set up then able to feed self.” See LIC9099-C pages for more information. Page 1 of 5. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 26, 2025 · control 26-AS-20241007093238
Mar 26, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20243 state visits · 3 documents
Nov 25, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 8, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 14, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff did not seek resident medical attention in a timely manner.

On 5/14/24, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Grace Donato conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit. LPA met with Co-Administrator (CAD) Michael Rosete and LPA explained the purpose of today's visit. Regarding the allegation of staff did not seek resident medical attention in a timely manner, reporting party (RP) stated that resident R1 has a fever of 101, with cough/congestion since Sun/Mon 1/16-17 and sending R1 to the hospital for evaluation and treatment. LPA visited the facility and interviewed CAD. CAD stated that there was no covid positive residents or staff in the facility during this time. There was an incident report submitted to Licensing that at 6:30 am on 1/18/22 R1 has non stop coughing, 911 was called immediately and R1 got transported the hospital. R1 was not tested in the facility for covid. Prior to 1/18/22, R1 didn’t have any symptoms nor was sick. Based on interviews and records review, the department has determined that that the allegation is false, cothe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 14, 2024 · control 26-AS-20220119152329
Beside homes the same size
Type A citations1typical 1
Type B citations0typical 1
Substantiated complaints1typical 2
Total complaints3typical 7
State visits on file20typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2001.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated2025560202433020224502021450
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$6,000$9,000 /mo
our estimate — Santa Clara County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?
How are care plans reviewed when a resident’s needs change?

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (408) 247-0815

Is Rose Garden Court licensed?

Yes — Rose Garden Court is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in San Jose (Santa Clara County): California license #435200967, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 30 residents. State records list 19 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated December 1, 2025, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Rose Garden Court care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Rose Garden Court with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, hospice care, and bedridden; it does not list dementia / memory care. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGES 60 & ABOVE. 17 MAY BE NON-AMBULATORY AND 13 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN IN ROOM # 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, AND 15. THE HOSPICE WAIVER WITH THE TOTAL CARE ADDENDUM FOR 10 HAS BEEN APPROVED.

How much does Rose Garden Court cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Rose Garden Court's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Santa Clara County typically runs $6,000–$9,000/mo and small board-and-care homes $5,000–$8,000/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Rose Garden Court accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Rose Garden Court is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

12 of 30 beds occupied (40%) when the state visited on May 14, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Rose Garden Court?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 20 state visits and 19 dated documents since 2021 for Rose Garden Court; 3 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated May 14, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

3 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not ensure that facility is free from insects or rodents.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
THIS IS AN AMENDED REPORT. On 05/14/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Santino Fortes arrived to the facility unannounced to deliver the complaint investigation findings for the above allegation. LPA met with Licensee, Michael Roste. On 2/5/2025 the Department received a complaint with the above allegation. On 2/14/2025 the Department conducted the initial unannounced complaint investigation. LPA interviewed staff and residents. LPA conducted a facility file review. Based on observations, LPA inspected the facility inside and out to include resident rooms, common rooms, kitchen and food pantry. LPA did not observe any insects or pests. LPA interviewed 3 out of 3 staff (S1, S2, S3) who stated that they have not observed insects/pests in the facility and see exterminators periodically fumigating the facility. 5 out of 6 residents (R2, R3, R4, R5, R6) interviewed stated that they have not seen insects in the facility and see exterminators regularly fumigating the facility. See LIC9099-CDSS inspection report, May 14, 2025 · control 26-AS-20250205155405
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are not following a resident's dietary plan Staff are not assisting a resident with transferring from bed
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) David Marrufo conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit and met with Michael Rosete. On 10/07/2024, the department received a complaint with the above allegations. On 10/11/2024, LPAs Fortes and Marrufo conducted an initial complaint investigation visit. LPA Marrufo obtained a copy of the Resident Roster, which indicates that R1 was admitted to the facility on 08/09/2024. LPA Marrufo obtained a copy of R1’s Physician’s Report, which is dated 07/30/2024. R1’s Physician’s Report has neither the “Yes” nor “No” columns checked in the row indicating if R1 has a special diet. The “Able to Feed Self” row is checked “No” and has the comment, “requires set up then able to feed self.” See LIC9099-C pages for more information. Page 1 of 5. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, March 26, 2025 · control 26-AS-20241007093238

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not seek resident medical attention in a timely manner.
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
On 5/14/24, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Grace Donato conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit. LPA met with Co-Administrator (CAD) Michael Rosete and LPA explained the purpose of today's visit. Regarding the allegation of staff did not seek resident medical attention in a timely manner, reporting party (RP) stated that resident R1 has a fever of 101, with cough/congestion since Sun/Mon 1/16-17 and sending R1 to the hospital for evaluation and treatment. LPA visited the facility and interviewed CAD. CAD stated that there was no covid positive residents or staff in the facility during this time. There was an incident report submitted to Licensing that at 6:30 am on 1/18/22 R1 has non stop coughing, 911 was called immediately and R1 got transported the hospital. R1 was not tested in the facility for covid. Prior to 1/18/22, R1 didn’t have any symptoms nor was sick. Based on interviews and records review, the department has determined that that the allegation is false, coCDSS inspection report, May 14, 2024 · control 26-AS-20220119152329

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 20 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
1
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
0
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
1
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
3
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
20
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(408) 247-0815
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Rose Garden Court? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.