Skip to main content
CovelightCare
  • Start your search

    • MapExplore homes by area and what matters to you.
    • Directory
    • Guided search
    • Medi-Cal care homes

    Take a closer look

    • Check a home
    • Compare homes
    • Ask homes for me
  • Step by step

    • All care guidesEvery guide, in the order you’ll need them.
    • 1Step 1: Learn the kinds of care homes
    • 2Step 2: Ways to pay for care
    • 3Step 3: Find homes and check them
    • 4Step 4: Visit, and get the papers before you sign
    • 5Step 5: Move in
    • 6Step 6: The first months, and your rights

    Start with a question

    • Who pays for a care home?
    • Does Medi-Cal pay for a care home?
    • Board and care or assisted living?
    • Leaving the hospital soon?
    • Can a care home make someone leave?
    • Print a visit checklist
    • Check a home’s license
  • Professional tools

    • All professional tools
    • Discharge planning
    • Care management
    • Fiduciaries
    • Elder-law attorneys
    • Public-record worklist

    Care home operators

    • Manage your home’s profileYour home’s information and family inquiries.
    • Claim a home
    • Operator sign in
  • Get to know Covelight

    • How we work
    • Our data & sources
    • What’s new
    • Suggest a correction
    • Contact us
Saved homesGuided search
  • Start your search

    • MapExplore homes by area and what matters to you.
    • Directory
    • Guided search
    • Medi-Cal care homes

    Take a closer look

    • Check a home
    • Compare homes
    • Ask homes for me
  • Step by step

    • All care guidesEvery guide, in the order you’ll need them.
    • 1Step 1: Learn the kinds of care homes
    • 2Step 2: Ways to pay for care
    • 3Step 3: Find homes and check them
    • 4Step 4: Visit, and get the papers before you sign
    • 5Step 5: Move in
    • 6Step 6: The first months, and your rights

    Start with a question

    • Who pays for a care home?
    • Does Medi-Cal pay for a care home?
    • Board and care or assisted living?
    • Leaving the hospital soon?
    • Can a care home make someone leave?
    • Print a visit checklist
    • Check a home’s license
  • Professional tools

    • All professional tools
    • Discharge planning
    • Care management
    • Fiduciaries
    • Elder-law attorneys
    • Public-record worklist

    Care home operators

    • Manage your home’s profileYour home’s information and family inquiries.
    • Claim a home
    • Operator sign in
  • Get to know Covelight

    • How we work
    • Our data & sources
    • What’s new
    • Suggest a correction
    • Contact us
Guided search
Silverado Senior Living - Belmont HillsLicense #415600869 · Covelight Care
Covelight CareSilverado Senior Living - Belmont HillsLicense #415600869 · 1301 Ralston Ave, Belmont, CA · (650) 654-9700Record printed from covelightcare.com — data as of the dates shown on each item.
Home/California/San Mateo County/Belmont/Silverado Senior Living - Belmont Hills
Map · 1301 Ralston Ave

© Protomaps © OpenStreetMap

Starting rate$13,350/mo

Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026 · See costs

Check availability

Request a tour

More days
  • AskThe cost, or your own question
  • (650) 654-9700

    From the state licensing record · October 26, 2026

  • silverado.com↗

Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.

SS

Call Silverado Senior Living - Belmont Hills

Belmont · Licensed for 112

(650) 654-9700

From the state licensing record · October 26, 2026

From the home’s website, silverado.com:

(424) 257-6418 · admissions line · seen October 27, 2026

or

Let us do the legwork

  • We ask about availability, price and the care you describe.
  • If it’s a fit, you choose whether they call you. Either way, you get every answer.
Check availabilityFree

Large community · Licensed for 112 · Belmont

Silverado Senior Living - Belmont Hills

1301 Ralston Ave, Belmont, CA 94002 · Licensed since 2013

  • Overview
  • Care
  • Costs
  • Daily life
  • Location
  • State record

Silverado Senior Living - Belmont Hills

Overview

Starting rate

$13,350 a month

Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026 See costs

No openings reported

  • Approved by the state: Dementia · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · October 26, 2026
  • Languages spoken: English, Spanish, French, Chinese, German, Mandarin, American sign language, Russian, Vietnamese, Japanese, Arabic, Ukrainian, Dutch and FilipinoReported on Seniorly · August 24, 2026
  • Licensed for 112: a large care communityThe state license record

Ask this home

Check availability

Request a tour

More days
  • AskThe cost, or your own question

Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.

Care and support

  • Dementia
  • Hospiceup to 25 residents
  • Bedriddenup to 112 residents

Not on file: wheelchair approval.

Approved by the state · State licensing record · October 26, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. ALL MAY BE BEDRIDDEN.DEMENTIA SPECIAL CARE WITH DELAYED EGRESS. LOCKED PERIMETER IS PERMITTED. LICENSE IS SUBJECT TO TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 25 RESIDENTS. * MEDICAL OFFICE NOT PART OF THE LICENSED FACILITY. *

983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA

CDSS record, verbatim · October 26, 2026

Care services

These are the home’s own statements about its day-to-day practice — they are not part of the state licensing record, and the state has not approved or reviewed them.

  • Assisted living

    Reported on silverado.com · source dated March 12, 2026.

  • Help with bathing or showering

    Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • Assistance with transfers

    Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • Works with residents’ own health care providers

    Reported on silverado.com · source dated September 29, 2026.

  • Diabetic / carbohydrate-controlled diet

    Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • Incontinence care

    Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • Respite / short-term stays

    Reported on silverado.com · source dated September 29, 2026.

  • Help with dressing and grooming

    Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • Building is wheelchair accessible

    Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • Medication management

    Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • Disease management

    Reported on silverado.com · source dated September 29, 2026.

  • Diabetes care

    Reported on silverado.com · source dated September 29, 2026.

  • Works with hospice

    Reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • 24-hour supervision claimed

    Reported on silverado.com · source dated March 12, 2026.

  • Licensed or certified staff

    Reported on silverado.com · source dated September 29, 2026.

  • Training topics namedComplexities of dementia care · Non-verbal communication · Safety concerns and fall prevention · Behavioral changes like agitation or wandering · Memory loss and confusionWe don’t have this home’s dementia-care disclosure. California requires a home that advertises dementia care to describe that care in writing when you ask.

    Reported on silverado.com · source dated September 29, 2026.

  • Secured building entry

    Reported on silverado.com · source dated September 29, 2026.

  • Emergency call system

    Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.

As needs change

  • Medicines

    Who handles medications: Licensed nurses manage medications.

    silverado.com · September 29, 2026

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 25 — care may continue at the end of life

    State licensing record · October 26, 2026

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation on file

    State licensing record · October 26, 2026

We’ll ask for you. Not on file for Silverado Senior Living - Belmont Hills: two-person transfers or a lift and who is awake overnight. When we check availability, we ask about these too.

Check availability

What it costs here

This home’s starting rate

$13,350a month to start

Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026

Costs & moving in

  • What the base rate includesHousing · Meals · Care services · Programs · Access to the community

    Reported on silverado.com · source dated September 29, 2026.

  • What costs extraSome medical services · Some personal care needs · Personal care needs (Some; depending on the situation)

    Reported on silverado.com · source dated September 29, 2026.

Monthly cost breakdownWith a studio and basic help · room, care and fees$13,350likely a month
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room
  • Starting monthly rate$13,350this home

    The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly, seen September 9, 2026.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (44 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,500one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,500 (133 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $13,350–$13,950
$13,350
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $13,350–$17,500
$15,850
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Rates at nearby homes10 nearby homes publish starting rates of $4,950 to $15,000

$4,950$15,000

This homeA nearby home’s published starting rate

10 homes like this within 5 miles publish starting rates mostly between $5,350–$8,550.

  • Ivy Park of BelmontBelmont · 0.8 mi · Large community
    $5,995Listed on its own website · private studio & companion suites available floor plans · seen October 27, 2026
  • San Carlos ElmsSan Carlos · 1.4 mi · Large community
    $6,274Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
  • Hopkins ManorRedwood City · 3.0 mi · Large community
    $5,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
  • Atria at Foster SquareFoster City · 3.1 mi · Large community
    $8,400Listed on its own website · studio apartment · seen October 27, 2026
  • Sunrise of San MateoSan Mateo · 3.6 mi · Large community
    $8,700Listed on its own website · studio · seen October 27, 2026
  • The StratfordSan Mateo · 3.9 mi · Large community
    $7,900Listed on its own website · starting room rate · seen October 27, 2026
  • The Peninsula RegentSan Mateo · 4.3 mi · Large community
    $5,776Listed on its own website · single occupancy · seen October 5, 2026
  • Marbella Redwood CityRedwood City · 4.5 mi · Large community
    $4,950Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Gordon ManorRedwood City · 4.6 mi · Large community
    $8,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
  • Kensington Place Redwood CityRedwood City · 4.8 mi · Large community
    $15,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
How this estimate worksWhere this price comes from

The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly, seen September 9, 2026.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time move-in fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

Ask for the price

An estimate for planning, not a quote. A home sets the price after hearing about the care needed.

Daily life

Rooms, meals, activities and house rules, in the home’s own words. Open any detail to see where it came from.

Rooms & the spaces they will use (17)Private bathroom · Outdoor space · Room types
  • Private bathroom

    Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • Outdoor spaceTree-lined grounds · Forested hill · A forested hill · Enclosed courtyards · Walking trails · Courtyards · and 5 more

    Tree-lined grounds · Forested hill · A forested hill — reported on silverado.com · source dated March 12, 2026.

    Enclosed courtyards · Walking trails · Courtyards — reported on silverado.com · seen October 27, 2026.

    Enclosed outdoor spaces — reported on silverado.com · source dated September 29, 2026.

    Outdoor common space · Patio · Garden · Walking paths — reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • Room typesStudio (all inclusive) · Semi-Private

    Studio — reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.

    Semi-Private — reported on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Common areasQuiet spaces for reflection · Open-concept floor plans · Grill · Dining room · Fitness room · Business room · and 7 more

    Quiet spaces for reflection · Open-concept floor plans — reported on silverado.com · source dated September 29, 2026.

    Grill · Dining room · Fitness room · Business room · Library · Arts room · Activity room · Movie theater · Game room · Spa / sauna / wellness room · Cognitive learning center — reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • Rooms come furnished

    Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • LaundryDone by staff

    Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • Roll-in / accessible shower

    Reported on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Visitor parking

    Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • Wifi in resident rooms

    Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • AmenitiesQuiet spaces for reflection · Piano · Fireplace · Concierge · Move-in coordination

    Quiet spaces for reflection — reported on silverado.com · source dated September 29, 2026.

    Piano · Fireplace · Concierge · Move-in coordination — reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • Air conditioning in the room

    Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • Housekeeping

    Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • Cable or satellite TV

    Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • Salon or barber

    Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • Kitchenette in the unit

    Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • Telephone in the room

    Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • Ground-floor units

    Reported on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026.

Meals, preferences & familiar food (13)Dining style · Special diets supported · All-day or flexible dining
  • Dining styleRestaurant style

    Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • Special diets supportedSpecial dietary needs · Low / No Sodium

    Special dietary needs — reported on silverado.com · source dated September 29, 2026.

    Low / No Sodium — reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • All-day or flexible dining

    Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • Vegetarian or vegan optionsVegetarian

    Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • Dishes the home names, on a published menu or in its own description of its foodFinger food options

    Reported on silverado.com · source dated September 29, 2026.

  • Food allergy management

    Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • Meals served in the room

    Reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Family may eat with the resident

    Reported on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Assistance with eating

    Reported on silverado.com · source dated September 29, 2026.

  • Meals provided

    Reported on silverado.com · seen October 27, 2026.

  • Professional chef

    Reported on silverado.com · source dated September 29, 2026.

  • Places to eat on sitePrivate Dining Room

    Reported on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Dining atmosphereRestaurant quality meals

    Reported on silverado.com · source dated March 12, 2026.

Activities & the rhythm of a day (11)The shape of an ordinary day, as the home describes it · Activity types offered · Activities tailored to the individual
  • The shape of an ordinary day, as the home describes itActivities are scheduled throughout the day to provide routine and structure, especially for people with dementia.We don’t have this home’s dementia-care disclosure. California requires a home that advertises dementia care to describe that care in writing when you ask.

    Reported on silverado.com · source dated September 29, 2026.

  • Activity types offeredWorld class activities and programs · Purposeful engagement (As part of Nexus®) · Cognitive skill-building (As part of Nexus®) · Social interaction (As part of Nexus®) · Gardening · Nature programs · and 31 more

    World class activities and programs — reported on silverado.com · source dated March 12, 2026.

    Purposeful engagement · Cognitive skill-building · Social interaction · Gardening · Nature programs · Therapeutic programs · Music therapy · Art therapy · Pet therapy — reported on silverado.com · source dated September 29, 2026.

    Structured, research-informed activities supporting memory, attention, language, executive functioning, emotional well-being, and social connection · Structured, research-informed activities — reported on silverado.com · source dated February 17, 2026.

    Music programs · Scheduled daily activities · Movie nights · Outdoor programs · Bible study group · Happy hour · Cooking classes · Live dance or theater performances · Holiday parties · Dances · Art classes · Has karaoke · Trivia games · Has birthday parties · Has garden club — reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.

    Gardening Club · Pet-focused Programs · Karaoke · BBQs or Picnics · Educational Speakers / Life Long Learning · Live Musical Performances · Brain fitness / Dakim · Birthday Parties · Light Therapy Programs · Activities On-site — reported on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Activities tailored to the individual

    Reported on silverado.com · source dated March 12, 2026.

  • Exercise or fitness programPhysical fitness (As part of Nexus®) · Exercise classes tailored to mobility and energy levels · Exercise classes

    Reported on silverado.com · source dated September 29, 2026.

  • Trips outside the home

    Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • Resident-run activities

    Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • Religious services at the home

    Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • Religious services off site

    Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • Intergenerational programs

    Reported on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Activities coordinator on staff

    Reported on silverado.com · source dated March 12, 2026.

  • Therapy animal visits

    Reported on silverado.com · source dated September 29, 2026.

Faith, culture & language (4)Faith tradition · Languages spoken by caregivers · Religious observance supported
  • Faith traditionInterfaith spiritual care · Interfaith

    Reported on silverado.com · source dated September 29, 2026.

  • Languages spoken by caregiversEnglish · Spanish · French · Chinese · German · Mandarin · and 8 more

    English · Spanish · French · Chinese · German · Mandarin · American sign language · Russian · Vietnamese · Japanese · Arabic · Ukrainian · Dutch · Filipino — reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • Religious observance supportedEmotional and spiritual needs · Community rituals and celebrations · Christian services

    Emotional and spiritual needs · Community rituals and celebrations — reported on silverado.com · source dated September 29, 2026.

    Christian services — reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • Clergy or chaplain visits

    Reported on silverado.com · source dated September 29, 2026.

Pets, routines & independence (3)Residents may bring a pet · Pet types allowed · The home has its own pets
  • Residents may bring a pet

    Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • Pet types allowedDogs · Cats · Birds · Small pet

    Reported on silverado.com · source dated September 29, 2026.

  • The home has its own pets

    Reported on silverado.com · seen October 27, 2026.

Visiting & staying involved (5)Support services for families · Transport for shopping and errands · Public transit access claimed
  • Support services for families

    Reported on silverado.com · source dated March 12, 2026.

  • Transport for shopping and errands

    Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • Public transit access claimed

    Reported on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Transport for group outings

    Reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Transportation

    Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.

About the home (1)Brand or trade name
  • Brand or trade nameSilverado

    Reported on silverado.com · source dated March 12, 2026.

Where it is

1301 Ralston Ave, Belmont, CA 94002Address from the public record · October 26, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

  1. 1San Mateo Medical CenterHospital · General acute care, on the state’s list1.5 mi

Straight-line distances; check the drive or the walk. Hospital: the nearest general acute care hospital on the state’s list (CDPH, September 16, 2026).

Open directions ↗

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

CDSS public record, read October 26, 2026 · License #415600869 · See the state’s own record ↗

The last 36 months — 18 of 42 documents

Complaint outcomes in these 36 months, in the state’s words: 1 “Substantiated” and 1 “Unsubstantiated”.

20262 state visits · 2 documents

Mar 24, 2026Facility evaluation reportCase Management - IncidentReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Incident

On March 24, 2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Curley conducted an unannounced case-management visit in relation to two incidents that occurred at the facility. LPA met with Administrator, Robert Snee and explained the purpose of the visit. The Licensee reported on 3/8/26 at around 8:00pm, Resident 1 (R1) and Resident 2 (R2) were found together in a room. Both residents were observed half undressed. R1 was observed behind R2 but was not observed touching R2. R1 and R2 were immediately separated and redirected back to their rooms. There were no signs of intimacy or injuries. Licensee implemented 30 minute status checks, reminded staff to redirect and encourage both residents to join activities. All required parties were notified On 3/12/26 at around 6:40pm, the Licensee reported, R1 and R2 were found undressed and involved in an intimate act in a room. Both residents were separated and required parties were notified. Status checks were implemented for every During the visit, LPA reviewed R1 and R2's files, discussed incident with staff, and reviewed the facility's policy regarding resident relationships. According to R1 and R2's file, both residents have Alzheimer's dementia diagnosis and this was the first incident with R1 and R2 being half undressed and being intimate with each other. R1 and R2's service plan was observed to be updated to address these incidents. According to the Assistant Director of Health Services observed R1 and R2 walking around in the courtyard at around 6pm. Administrator and Assistant Director of Health Services indicated that R1 was moved to a different neighborhood and since these incidents, there has not been any new incidents and they have not been observed together. No citations are issued during the visit. Report is reviewed with Assistant Director of Health Services and a copy is provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 24, 2026
Jan 5, 2026Facility evaluation reportCase Management - OtherReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

On January 5, 2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Curley conducted an unannounced case management visit to deliver a copy of amended report that was originally delivered on 2/25/25. LPA met with amended administrator, Robert Snee and explained the purpose of the visit. During the visit, LPA delivered an amended copy of LIC9099 and LIC9099D that was issued on February 25, 2025. Report was reviewed with Administrator, Robert Snee and a copy is provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 5, 2026

20258 state visits · 10 documents

Dec 29, 2025Facility evaluation reportCase Management - IncidentReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Incident

On December 29, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Curley conducted an unannounced case-management visit to follow up on an incident that occurred on 12/3/25. LPA met with Director of Health Services, Amyda Astrero and explained the purpose of the visit. The Licensee reported on 12/3/25, Staff 1 (S1) was assisting Resident 1 (R1) with care when R1 suddenly became agitated and aggressive towards S1. Resident 2 (R2) entered the room and observed R1 being aggressive towards S1. R2 kicked R1's leg and R1 slapped R2's leg. Both residents were immediately separated, assessed for injuries and were placed on behavior mapping. During the visit, LPA observed R1 and R2, discussed the incident with Director of Health Services and Assistant Director of Health Services, and reviewed both residents' files. Based on R1 and R2's file reviewed, both residents have a dementia diagnosis. Based on R1's file reviewed, R1 has a behavior of aggression/agitation and it's towards staff during care. Based on R2's file, he/she had a history of aggressive behavior, however it has improved. During the visit, LPA observed R1 walking around the community and R2 in the dining hall. According to the Director of Health Services and Assistant Director of Health Services, R2 hit R1 because he/she was trying to protect S1 from R1's aggressive behaviors. No residents had injuries noted. No citations are issued during the visit. Report is reviewed with Director of Health Services and a copy is provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 29, 2025
Dec 29, 2025Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On December 29, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Curley conducted an unannounced annual inspection. LPA met with Director of Health Services, Amyda Astrero and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA toured the facility inside and outside but not limited to, five resident neighborhoods; maple, cedar, bay, twin pines and oak, one main administrative office, library, and kitchen. No accessible bodies of water or fire safety hazards observed. This is a locked perimeter facility. LPA toured resident neighborhoods and observed a dining room in each neighborhood. Hallways and resident rooms were observed to be clean, odor-free and free from tripping hazards. Nurses/wellness office was observed in Oak and Maple neighborhood. Medications were observed to be locked and inaccessible to residents. Chemicals and sharps were locked and inaccessible from residents. Water temperature throughout the facility measured between 105-117 degrees F. Communal bathrooms were observed to be clean and odor-free. Kitchen was observed two day perishables and seven day non-perishables. A comfortable temperature is maintained and lighting is sufficient for comfort. Fire extinguishers were serviced in 10/2025. Emergency drills are logged and done every three months. LPA reviewed 5 resident files and 5 staff files. Resident records are updated, complete and signed. Staff records are complete, with training logs that have met the basic requirement. Medication review was done, and all medications are accounted for, and centrally stored medication records are updated. No citations are issued during the visit. Report is reviewed with Director of Health Services and a copy is provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 29, 2025
Oct 8, 2025Facility evaluation reportCase Management - IncidentReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Incident

On October 8, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Curley conducted an unannounced case management visit in relation to an incident that occurred on 9/26/25. LPA met with Administrator, Robert Snee and explained the purpose of the visit. On 9/26/25, the Licensee reported Resident 1 (R1) was standing in the dining room when Resident 2 (R2) came up to R1 and leaned his/her head over R1's shoulder. It was observed that R1 punched R2 on the left side of his/her face. Both residents were immediately separated. According to R1, R2 punched him/her first. During the investigation, LPA reviewed R1 and R2's file, observed both residents, and reviewed care plans. Based on both resident's files, R1 and R2 have a diagnosis of dementia. Based on records reviewed, this is the second altercation incident between R1 and R2. According to staff interviewed, verbal training was conducted to ensure both residents are seated separately/ are separated at all times. R2 was seen by his/her physician and there was a medication adjustment. LPA observed both R2 walking around in the courtyard and R1 was observed participating in activities. No citations are issued during the visit. Report is reviewed with Administrator and a copy is provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 8, 2025
Sep 16, 2025Facility evaluation reportCase Management - IncidentReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Incident

On September 16, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Curley conducted an unannounced case management visit to follow up on an incident that occurred on 8/26/25. LPA met with Administrator, Robert Snee and explained the purpose of the visit. On 8/26/25, the Licensee reported at approximately 2:30pm, it was found that Resident 1 (R1) left the community was was observed by a caregiver driving to the facility, that R1 was walking on the sidewalk heading towards Notre Dame School. The caregiver immediately parked, approached R1 and brought R1 back to the community. No injuries were noted. Upon investigation, it was noted that the gate failed to lock. During the visit, LPA reviewed R1's file and toured the facility to observe that locks at the facility. Based on R1's file reviewed, R1 has a diagnosis of dementia. R1 has no history of elopements, however does have wandering behaviors. According to administrator and staff interviewed, the locks failed and the gate did not lock properly. Third party vendor, Lockworks Unlimited arrived the same day to fix the locks and checked all other exit gates to ensure the locks did not fail. During the visit, LPA toured the facility and observed all the exit. All gates were locked. According to the administrator, the gates were also re-keyed. No citations are issued during the visit. Report is reviewed with the administrator and a copy is provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 16, 2025
Aug 5, 2025Facility evaluation reportCase Management - OtherReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

On August 5, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Curley conducted an unannounced case management visit. LPA met with Administrator, Robert Snee and explained the purpose of the visit. The purpose of today's visit is to deliver an immediate exclusion letter to exclude Staff #1 (S1) from the facility. The letter was given to the Administrator, Robert Snee. This report is reviewed and discussed with the Administrator and a copy is provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 5, 2025
Jul 31, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident sustained pressure injuries in care. Due to staff neglect, resident was dehydrated.

On July 31, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Curley conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver the findings for the above allegations. LPA met with Director of Health Services, Amyda Astrero and explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation, resident sustained pressure injuries in care, according to the reporting party, Resident 1 (R1) was admitted to the hospital on February 19th with open wounds on both heels. R1 had deep tissue pressure injury on the left heel and a wound on the right heel. During the investigation, LPA interviewed staff, reviewed R1’s file and reviewed medical records. Based on charting notes reviewed, on 2/15/25, the facility reported a right heel wound to R1’s physician and R1’s responsible party. According to R1’s responsible party, it was noted that R1 has a history of pressure ulcer. According to interviewed staff, R1’s physician sent a referral to home health wound nurse, however on 2/19/25, R1 was sent to the ER and was told by R1’s responsible party that home health called to notify R1’s responsible party that they are coming to the facility, however cancelled because R1 was still admitted at the hospital. (continue to 9099C) Unsubstantiated Based on photos, facility wound care notes, home health wound care notes, and interviews conducted, R1 returned to the community on 3/7/25 with wounds on both heels. Home health wound nurse came into the facility for wound care 3x a week. On 4/11/25, R1 was admitted to hospice. Regarding the allegation, due to staff neglect, resident was dehydrated, according to the reporting party, R1 was admitted to the hospital on 2/19/25 for dehydration. During the investigation, LPA interviewed staff. According to staff interviewed, the facility was notified that R1 had a history of dehydration. Because the facility is not a skilled nursing facility, they don't log water intake, however since facility staff were aware of the history of dehydration, the facility staff ensured to monitor R1's water intake. Facility staff indicated that a water bottle was also purchased for R1 so that staff are aware how much water R1 is drinking a day. Based on interviews conducted, documents reviewed and information collected, the department has determined that although the above allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the above allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Report is reviewed with the Director of Health Services and a copy is provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 31, 2025 · control 14-AS-20250320161225
Jul 31, 2025Facility evaluation reportCase Management - IncidentReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Incident

On July 31, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Curley conducted an unannounced case management visit in relation to an incident that occurred on July 8, 2025. LPA met with Director of Health Services (DHS), Amyda Astrero and explained the purpose of the visit. The Licensee reported, on 7/8/25, a med-tech reported to the DHS that Staff 1 (S1) reported on 7/6/25, Resident 1 (R1) refused to go out of his/her room because he/she was afraid of Staff 2 (S2). The med-tech spoke to R1 and R1 indicated that S2 is rough to R1 and pushed R1 against the wall. DHS conducted an investigation and asked R1 is he/she knew the staff and R1 stated S2's name and stated S2 threw him/her against the wall and left him/her in a bad position. No injuries were notes. S2 was suspended pending investigation. During the investigation, LPA reviewed R1's file, reviewed facility's investigation and attempted to interview S2 and R1. R1 was not interviewable during the visit as he/she was eating lunch. S2 was not working during the time of the visit. Based on R1's file reviewed, R1 has a diagnosis of dementia, however does not have any aggressive or violent behaviors. According to the DHS, this is the first time R1 accused a staff of being aggressive towards him/her. Based on the facility's investigation, the findings went unsubstantiated as no staff member from the PM shift on 7/6/25 witnessed the incident. DHS provided training documents for S2 and will complete an in-service training with all staff on 7/31/25. According to the DHS, S2 is back to work, however is in a different neighborhood from R1. No citations are issued during the visit. Report is reviewed with Director of Health Services and a copy is provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 31, 2025
Jun 4, 2025Facility evaluation reportCase Management - OtherReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

On June 4, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Charitra conducted an unannounced case-management visit. LPA met with Director of Health Services, Amyda Astrero and explained the purpose of the visit. The purpose of today's visit is to deliver an immediate exclusion letter to exclude an Staff 1 (S1) and Staff 2 (S2) from the facility. The letter was given to the Director of Health Services. This report is reviewed and discussed with the Director of Health Services and a copy is provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 4, 2025
May 27, 2025Facility evaluation reportCase Management - IncidentReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Incident

On May 27, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Charitra conducted an unannounced case management in relation to an incident that occurred on 4/27/25. LPA met with Administrator, Robert Snee and explained the purpose of the visit. On 4/27/25, the Licensee reported, the facility's engagement assistant (S1) observed Resident 1's (R1's) 1:1 caregiver sitting outside the door holding the door knob preventing R1 from leaving the room. All required parties were notified. New medications were ordered and 1:1 caregiver was terminated. During the visit today, LPA interviewed staff and reviewed R1's file. Based on file reviewed, R1 has a diagnosis of advanced dementia and a previous history of aggressive behavior, however was on medication to stabilize his/her aggressive behaviors. R1's behavior stabilized so the physician stopped the medication, however R1 started having aggressive behaviors. According to staff interviewed, the 1:1 caregiver was through a third party vendor/agency the facility uses, however the family contracted with the vendor/agency directly. The Director of Health Services indicated, when S1 witnessed 1:1 caregiver sitting outside holding R1's door knob preventing R1 from leaving his/her room, S1 immediately let R1 out of the room and walked him/her around outside. 1:1 caregiver is no longer allowed to come back to the facility and another 1:1 caregiver was hired to assist R1. R1 has a weekly psychiatrist appointments and medication management has been implemented. No citations are issued during the visit. Report is reviewed with the administrator and a copy is provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 27, 2025
Feb 25, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not seek timely medical attention for a resident

**This is an amended copy of the report that was issued on February 25, 2025. An amended copy of LIC9099 and LIC9099D will be provided during visit on January 5, 2026.** On February 25, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Charitra conuducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver the finding for the above allegations. LPA met with Administrator, Robert Snee and explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation, staff did not seek timely medical attention for resident, according to the reporting party, on 12/23/24, Resident 1 (R1) had a witnessed fall at 11am and the facility did not seek timely medical attention until 4:54pm when R1's responsible party told S1 to call 911 after calling for an update and being notified by Staff 1 (S1) that R1 is in severe pain and can't move his/her leg. During the investigation, LPA interviewed administrator, staff, and reviewed documentation. Based interviews conducted, 3/3 staff members indicated R1 had a witnessed fall at 11am and complained of pain. Staff immediately responded, assisted R1 from the floor and assessed R1. S1 and Staff 2 (S2) indicated that they reached out the the doctor for advice, however the doctor was not responding. S1 and S2 checked on R1 throughout the day and R1 still complained of pain. (Continue to 9099C) Substantiated S2 who was on the AM shift admitted that he/she should have called 911 immediately after resident had a fall and complained of pain, however indicated because resident was not in severe pain, S2 did not call 911. S1 who was on shift during the PM shift, indicated he/she was not sure why the facility did not send R1 to the hospital after the fall in the morning. The facility did not send R1 out to the hospital till about 5:30pm when R1 started moaning, complaining of pain, and couldn't move his/her legs. Based on medical records reviewed, due to the fall, R1 sustained a left hip fracture. Based on the investigation, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be substantiated. Deficiencies of the California Code of Regulations, Title, 22 cited on the LIC9099-D. Failure to correct the deficiencies may result in civil penalties. Failure to correct said deficiencies may result in additional civil penalties. AN IMMEDIATE CIVIL PENALTY OF $500.00 WAS ASSESSED TODAY: $500 FOR THE VIOLATION AS STAFF DID NOT SEEK MEDICAL ATTENTION FOR A RESIDENT. THE ADMINISTRATOR WAS INFORMED THAT AN ADDITIONAL CIVIL PENALTY IS STILL BEING DETERMINED AND MIGHT BE ASSESSED BASED ON HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE §1569.49. According to the administrator and the Director of Health Services, the facility's protocol is to have the shift nurse call responsible parties regarding incidents that occur before they leave their shift. The facility did notify R1's responsible party based on interview conducted with S2, administrator and Director of Health Services. Based on care notes reviewed, it was observed that S2 did contact R1's responsible party. Based on the above information, the Department has found that this allegation to be UNFOUNDED, meaning that this allegation was false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. Report is reviewed with the administrator and a copy is provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 25, 2025 · control 14-AS-20241227093734

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87465(a) · Plan of correction due date: Feb 26, 2025

87465 Incidental Medical and Dental Care - (a) A plan for incidental medical and dental care shall be developed by each facility. The plan shall encourage routine medical and dental care and provide for assistance in obtaining such care. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Licensee failed to seek timely medical attention after R1 had a fall and complained of pain. Based on interviews and records reviewed, R1 had a fall at 11am and R1 was not sent out to the hospital till about 5:30pm. Based on interview conducted with S2, S2 admitted that 911 should have been called immediately after R1 had a fall and complained of pain, however indicated because resident was not in severe pain, S2 did not call 911. Nevertheless, R1 complained to 3 staff members of pain and observed by staff of having pain and the facility did not seek medical attention for R1 which poses an immediate health risks to residents in care and resulted into a left hip fracture.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 25, 2025

Plan of correction: Licensee/administrator shall submit a plan in writing addressing how to seek timely medical attention. Civil penalty in the amount of $500.00 is being assessed today as the facility failed to seek timely medical treatment for Resident 1 (R1) after an incident that occurred on 12/23/24 which resulted in a fractured left hip.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87465(g) · Plan of correction due date: Jan 6, 2026

87465 Incidental Medical and Dental Care: (g) The licensee shall immediately telephone 9-1-1 if an injury or other circumstance has resulted in an imminent threat to a resident’s health including, but not limited to, an apparent life-threatening medical crisis except as specified in Sections 87469(c)(2)... This regulation is not met as evidenced by: Licensee failed to seek timely medical attention after R1 fell and immediately complained of pain. Staff interviewed admitted that R1 needed to go to the hospital but chose to wait stating R1 was not in enough pain. R1 had a severe injury and could not move their leg. Staff left R1 to endure pain for hours from approximately 11am to 5:30pm without seeking emergency medical services which poses an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 25, 2025

Plan of correction: Licensee completed an in-service training on 12/30/24 with nurses in relation to responding to change of condition and when to call 911. Deficiency cleared.

20244 state visits · 4 documents

Dec 3, 2024Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On December 3, 2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Charitra conducted an unannounced annual visit. LPA met with Administrator, Robert Snee and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA toured facility and grounds including but not limited to, five resident neighborhoods; maple, cedar, bay, twin pines and oak, one main administrative office, library, and kitchen. No accessible bodies of water or fire safety hazards observed. LPA toured resident neighborhoods and observed a dining room in each neighborhood. Dining room and hallways were clean and free from any tripping hazards. Resident rooms were observed clean, odor-free, with all required furniture. Nurses station was observed in the Oak and Maple neighborhood. Medications were observed to be locked and inaccessible to residents. First aid kits were observed to be present and complete. Toxins and chemicals were locked and stored away in a storage room. Water temperature throughout the facility measured between 105-115 degrees F. Communal bathrooms were observed to be clean and odor-free. Kitchen was observed two day perishables and seven day non-perishables. Lighting and temperature throughout the facility was sufficient for comfort. Fire extinguishers were mounted and serviced in 10/2024. Emergency drills are logged and done every three months. LPA reviewed 5 resident files and 5 staff files. Resident records are updated, complete and signed. Staff records are complete, with training logs that have met the basic requirement. Medication review was done, and all medications are accounted for, and centrally stored medication records are updated. Report is reviewed with Administrator and a copy is provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 3, 2024
Mar 15, 2024Facility evaluation reportCase Management - IncidentReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Incident

On March 15, 2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Charitra conducted an unannounced case management visit to follow up on an incident that was reported to CCL. LPA met with Administrator, Robert Snee and Director of Health Services, Amyda Astrero and explained the purpose of the visit. The Licensee reported on March 11, 2024 at approximately 12:05pm, Resident 1 (R1) was found by Resident Care Coordinator outside near the community parking lot in a wooded area. R1 was escorted back into the community and was assessed by the nurse. Based on facility's internal investigation, perimeter gates were all closed, locked and in working order; no evidence of equipment or rocks were visible to indicate gate was propped open. There were no signs of equipment or furniture to indicate that R1 could've climbed the gates. Facility initiated behavior mapping for R1 and conducted rounds to ensure all gates were locked and secure. In addition, on the same day, March 11, 2024 at approximately 6:25pm, while conducted rounds, staff reported that R1 was not in the dining room. Staff immediately started searching for R1. Med-tech found R1 walking around on the other side of the gates near the Bay neighborhood, close to a picnic area. R1 was redirected back into the community, assessment was done by nurse, and a one on one caregiver was assigned to R1. Community perimeters were checked again, all gates were observed locked. Locksworth Unlimited inspected the gates. During the visit, LPA reviewed R1's file, observed R1 eating lunch. R1 is currently residing in Twin Pines neighborhood where there is more staff present. Based on R1's file, R1 has a diagnosis of Alzheimer's Dementia and is unable to leave the facility unassisted. Behavior mapping log was observed. Facility conducted 30-minute status checks after the first incident occurred at 12:05pm. According to Administrator and Director of Health Services, R1 does not have a history of AWOL, however R1's responsible party takes R1 out of the community for several days at a time which; recent outing was hiking from 3/5/2024 - 3/10/2024. Updated service plan was observed. No citations issued during the visit. Report is reviewed with Administrator and a copy is provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 15, 2024
Feb 16, 2024Facility evaluation reportCase Management - OtherReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

On February 16, 2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Charitra met with Administrator, Robert Snee and Director of Health Services, Amyda Astrero for a Case Management visit to follow up on a substantiated complaint allegation of neglect and lack of supervision resulting in serious bodily injuries. On October 10, 2019, the Department concluded a complaint investigation which alleged that the facility did not provide proper care and supervision which resulted in a resident (R1) sustaining multiple falls including a serious bodily injury. The allegation was substantiated, and the licensee was cited for violating California Code of Regulations (CCR) Title 22, § 87464(f) Basic Services. The investigation revealed the facility failed to do an accurate fall risk assessment after R1 experienced multiple fall incidents at the facility on June 17, 2018, July 15, 2018, October 11, 2018, October 17, 2018, and December 19, 2018. As a result, the facility failed to identify and implement measures and or plan of care changes to minimize further fall incidents for R1. Based on documentation reviewed, according to the facility’s assessment, it was not identified that R1 was a high risk for falls. On March 1, 2019, R1 had another unwitnessed fall and was hospitalized. Based on the investigation, it was revealed that there are three small buildings on this property. There were no caregivers present in R1’s building before or at the time R1 fell. Two caregivers were in another building and a licensed vocational nurse (LVN) was in a med room, but the LVN was not answering their phone. As a result of the improper risk assessment and facility’s failure to identify and implement a proper plan of care to address R1’s fall risk; R1 sustained a right intertrochanteric femur fracture and needed to undergo an operation called femur intramedullary rodding. (Continue to 809C) In addition, based on the documents and information collected, the investigation revealed that the facility was aware of R1’s multiple falls, but continued to provide care based on inaccurate fall risk assessments, outdated plan of care, and did not notify the Primary Care Physician (PCP) of the changes until R1’s fall on March 1, 2019. There was no facility report or documentation available for review to indicate facility staff or the administrator had notified the PCP about R1’s fall history or a plan of care necessary to minimize R1’s risk for falls. At the time of the complaint visit on October 10, 2019, an immediate civil penalty of $500 was issued and the licensee was informed that an additional civil penalty was being determined and might be assessed based on Health and Safety Code § 1569.49. The Department has concluded an analysis and has determined that an additional civil penalty is warranted for a violation that resulted in R1 sustaining serious bodily injuries while under the care of this facility. Welfare and Institutions Code § 15610.67, defines serious bodily injury as “an injury involving extreme physical pain, substantial risk of death, or protracted loss or impairment of a function of a bodily member, organ, or of mental faculty, or requiring medical intervention, including but not limited to, hospitalization, surgery, or physical rehabilitation.” This is evidenced by the facility failing to provide the proper care and supervision to R1, knowing that R1 was a fall risk, resulting in R1 falling and sustaining a right intertrochanteric femur fracture, which is serious bodily injury. Today, February 16, 2024, the Department will be issuing a civil penalty per Health and Safety Code § 1569.49 for a violation that the Department constitutes as a serious bodily injury in the amount of $10,000. However, since an immediate civil penalty of $500 was previously issued on October 10, 2019, the amount of the civil penalty issued today will be $9500. A copy of the LIC 421D was given to Administrator, Robert Snee and originals were signed. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report issued. Appeal rights provided. Administrator, Robert Snee signature on this report acknowledges receipt of the appeal rights, found on page two of LIC 421D.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 16, 2024
Jan 31, 2024Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On January 31, 2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Charitra conducted an unannounced annual inspection. LPA met with Administrator, Robert Snee and Director of Health Services, Amyda Astrero and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA toured facility and grounds including but not limited to, five resident neighborhoods; maple, cedar, bay, twin pines and oak, one main administrative office, library, and kitchen. No accessible bodies of water or fire safety hazards observed. LPA toured resident neighborhoods and observed a dining room in each neighborhood. Dining room and hallways were clean and clear for hazards. Resident rooms observed had all required furniture and were observed to be clean. Nurses station was observed in the Oak and Maple neighborhood. Medications were observed to be locked. First aid kits were observed to be present and complete. Three laundry rooms and one main laundry room was observed to be locked. Toxins and chemicals were locked and stored away in a storage room. Water temperature throughout the facility measured between 112-118.9 degrees F. Six communal bathrooms were observed to be clean and odor-free. Kitchen was observed to be clean. Kitchen was observed two day perishables and seven day non-perishables. Lighting throughout the facility was sufficient for comfort. A comfortable temperature of 71 degrees F is maintained. Fire extinguishers were mounted and serviced in 10/2023. Emergency drills are logged and done every three months. LPA reviewed 5 resident records and 5 staff records. Resident records are updated, complete and signed. Staff records are complete, with training logs that have met the basic requirement. Medication review was done, and all medications are accounted for, and centrally stored medication records are updated. No citations are observed during the visit. Report is reviewed with the Administrator and Director of Health Services and a copy is provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 31, 2024

20232 state visits · 2 documents

Dec 19, 2023Facility evaluation reportCase Management - IncidentDeficiency page: Type A

Type of visit: Case Management - Incident

On December 19, 2023, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Charitra conducted an unannounced case management visit to follow up on an incident that occurred on December 10, 2023. LPA met with Administrator, Robert Snee and Director of Health Services, Amyda Astrero and explained the purpose of the visit. On December 10, 2023, the Licensee reported that a staff member observed Resident 1 (R1) and Resident 2 (R2) in the room together. It was reported that R1 was touching R2's chest area. R1 has a 24/7 one-on-one private caregiver assigned to him/her, however during the time of the incident, the private caregiver went to use the restroom and left R1 unattended without telling a staff member. During the visit, LPA reviewed R1's file, interviewed administrator and director of health services. According to Administrator and Director of Health Services, agency caregivers are required to contact the nurse's station and notify a staff member prior to going on break/lunch so a staff member can be assigned to be R1's companion while the agency caregiver is on break. Based on R1's file, this is the the third incident involving R1 touching another resident inappropriately; previous incidents occurred 11/7/2023 and 11/8/2023. A 24/7 private agency caregiver was assigned on 11/8/2023. Facility was unable to provide LPA an orientation checklist or training provided to the private one-on-one agency caregiver regarding breaks/lunches. Based on documents reviewed and interviews conducted, facility failed to provide orientation/training to the private on-on-one agency staff member assigned to R1 which resulted to R1 being left unattended. Nevertheless, due to R1 being left unattended, R1 was observed in the room with R2 touching his/her breasts. Deficiencies of the California Code of Regulations, Title, 22 cited on the LIC809-D. Failure to correct the deficiencies may result in additional civil penalties. Report is reviewed with the administrator and a copy is provided with appeal rights.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 19, 2023

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87468.1(a)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Dec 20, 2023

87468.1 Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities: (a) Residents in all residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following personal rights: (2) To be accorded safe, healthful and comfortable accommodations, furnishings and equipment. Violation of this regulation is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews conducted and documents reviewed, the facility failed to provide orientation/training to the private on-on-one agency staff member assigned to R1 which resulted to R1 being left unattended. Nevertheless, due to R1 being left unattended, R1 was observed in the room with R2 touching his/her breasts.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 19, 2023

Plan of correction: Licensee/Administrator to create a checklist and/or documented training for all one-on-one agency caregivers. Checklist/training to include; protocols when taking breaks and lunches.

Dec 6, 2023Facility evaluation reportCase Management - IncidentReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Incident

On December 6, 2023, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Charitra conducted an unannounced case-management visit to follow up on two incidents that was reported to CCLD. LPA met with Administrator, Robert Snee and Director of Health Services, Amyda Astrero and explained the purpose of the visit. The Licensee reported on 11/7/2023, Resident 1 (R1) was observed holding Resident's 2 (R2's) hand. It was observed by a caregiver that R1 reached over and touched R2's breasts. Caregiver immediately separated R1 and R2. R1 was placed on 30-minute checks, facility called responsible party to request a one-on-one caregiver, and facility called R1's physician to review R1's medications. The Licensee reported on 11/8/2023 around 4:30pm, R1 observed walking by R2 and gilded his/her hang over Resident 3's (R3's) breast area. Caregiver separated both residents at the time. One one one caregiver for R1 was provided at 6:30pm on 11/8/23, physician adjusted R1's medication, behavior mapping is on-going. During the visit, LPA reviewed R1's file, observed R1 and discussed the incidents with Administrator and Director of Health Services. Based on R1's record review, R1 has a diagnosis of Alzheimer's Dementia and does not have any inappropriate or aggressive behaviors. Based on observations, R1 was in the dining room with R1's one-on-one caregiver. According to the administrator and director of health services, R1 has not had any inappropriate incidents since the one-on-one caregiver was assigned and facility will continue to monitor R1. Director of Health Services will set up a meeting with R1's physician and responsible party and conduct a re-assessment for R1. No deficiencies are cited today. Report is reviewed with Administrator and Director of Health Services and a copy is provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 6, 2023
Earlier years2021 to 2023 · 24 documents

20238 state visits · 8 documents

Sep 29, 2023Facility evaluation reportCase Management - OtherReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

On September 29, 2023, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Charitra conducted an unannounced case management visit. LPA met with Administrator, Robert Snee, Director of Health of Services, Amyda Astrero and Assistant Director of Health Services, Hazel Yabut and explained the purpose of the visit. The purpose of today's visit is to deliver an immediate exclusion letter to exclude an employee of the facility. The letter was given to the Administrator. This report is reviewed and discussed with the Licensee and a copy is provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 29, 2023
Sep 7, 2023Facility evaluation reportCase Management - IncidentReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Incident

On September 7, 2023, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Charitra conducted an unannounced case management visit at the facility to follow up on an incident that was reported on 8/28/2023. LPA met with Administrator, Robert Snee and Director of Health Services, Amyda Astrero and explained the purpose of the visit. The Licensee reported on 8/25/2023, Staff #1 (S1) reported to Administrator that he/she observed Staff 2 (S2) throw a cup of tea on Resident 1 (R1). In addition, S1 reported that he/she observed S2 on 7/25/2023 make contact with S2's hand to Resident 3 (R3). During the visit, LPA discussed incidents with the administrator and director of health services. According to the interviewed staff, there were not witnesses for the two incidents being reported by S1. S2 was immediately suspended on 8/25/2023 and later terminated on 8/30/2023. Belmont Police, Ombudsman and all required parties were notified. Administrator to send facility's internal investigation records to LPA by 9/8/2023. No deficiencies are cited during visit. LPA to conduct a follow up visit if required. Report is reviewed with Director of Health Services and a copy is provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 7, 2023
Aug 18, 2023Facility evaluation reportCase Management - IncidentReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Incident

On August 18, 2023, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Charitra conducted an unannounced case-management visit to follow up on an incident that was reported to CCLD on 8/17/2023. LPA met with Administrator, Robert Snee and Director of Health Services, Amyda Astrero and explained the purpose of the visit. The Licensee reported on 8/10/2023, Resident 1 (R1) was bitten by a dog. Blood was noted on right middle finger, however R1 denied pain. During the visit, LPA interviewed the administrator, requested copies of the dog's vaccination records, reviewed facility policies and procedures regarding pets, observed blank facility admission agreement and reviewed a copy of resident handbook regarding pets at the facility. According to the administrator and director of health services, there were no prior biting incidents at the facility with this specific dog. The dog was returned back to the adoption center after the incident. LPA reviewed resident handbook and policies and procedures regarding pets at the community. Based on the resident handbook reviewed, it indicated that the community has pets to promote resident's quality of life. In addition, the facility handbook also indicates that residents are welcome to bring their pets as well. Furthermore, LPA reviewed the dog's vaccination record and all shots are up to date. No deficiencies cited during the visit. Report is reviewed with Director of Health Services and Administrator and a copy is provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 18, 2023
Aug 2, 2023Facility evaluation reportCase Management - IncidentReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Incident

On August 2, 2023, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Charitra conducted an unannounced case management visit to follow up on an incident that was reported to CCL on 7/20/2023. LPA met with Administrator, Robert Snee and Director of Health Services, Amyda Astrero and explained the purpose of the visit. The Licensee reporting on 7/18/2023, a staff member (S1) reported 3 separate incidents that occurred between Staff 2 (S2) and 3 different residents. During the visit, LPA collected documentation. No citations are issued at this time. Report is reviewed with administrator and a copy is provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 2, 2023
May 3, 2023Facility evaluation reportCase Management - IncidentReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Incident

On May 3, 2023, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Charitra conducted an unannounced case management visit to follow up on an incident that occurred on April 22, 2023. LPA met with Administrator, Robert Snee, Director of Health Services, Amyda Astrero and Assistant Director of Health Services, Hazel Yabut and explained the purpose of the visit. On May 1, 2023, the Licensee reported that a caregiver heard R1 shouting for help while being in the Maple dining room. According to the Licensee, the caregiver found R2 sitting on R1 with one hand on R1's chest and the other hand between R1's legs. During the visit, LPA discussed the incident with Administrator, Director of Health Services, and Assistant Directors of Health Services and reviewed resident files. According to the Administrator, this incident occurred after dinner when caregivers were assisting put residents to bed. The Director of Health Services indicated that the caregiver immediately responded to R1 as his/her room is near the Maple dining room. Based on R1 and R2's file, both residents have a diagnosis of dementia. According to the Director of Health Services and file reviewed, R2 does not have a history of touching residents, however he/she does have a wandering behavior where he/she wanders in the hallways or other residents rooms. During the visit today, LPA observed a one on one caregiver with R2. In addition, R2's medication dosage was increased. Furthermore, Administrator indicated that R2's room was changed to the Cedar building. No citations issued during this time. Report is reviewed with Robert Snee, Amyda Astrero, and Hazel Yabut and a copy is provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 3, 2023
Mar 17, 2023Facility evaluation reportCase Management - OtherDeficiency page: Type B

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

On March 17, 2023, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Charitra conducted an unannounced case management. LPA met with Administrator, Robert Snee and explained the purpose of the visit. The Department is amending the licensing report dated April 29, 2022 for complaint control number 14-AS-20220216135656 as per the February 24, 2023 First Level Appeal Response and reissuing the Reporting Requirements citations for Section 87211(a)(1) and Section 87211(b) as one violation. Deficiency of the Residential Care Elderly California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6 is observed and cited on a LIC 809D. Failure to correct the deficiencies may result in civil penalties. Report is reviewed with Administrator and a copy is provided with appeals rights.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 17, 2023

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87211(a)(1)(b) · Plan of correction due date: Mar 24, 2023

87211: Reporting Requirements: (a) Each licensee shall furnish to the licensing agency such reports as the Department may require, including, but not limited to, the following: (1) A written report shall be submitted to the licensing agency and to the person responsible for the resident within seven days of the occurrence of any of the events specified in (A) through (D) below…(b) “Any suspected physical abuse that results in serious bodily injury of an elder or dependent adult shall be reported to the local ombudsman, the corresponding licensing agency, and the local law enforcement agency within two (2) hours as required by Welfare and Institutions Code Section 15630(b)(1)”. Violation of this regulation is evidenced by: The facility failed to provide the LIC624 and SOC341 to the Department within regulatory timeframes for the incident of alleged abuse that occurred on February 13, 2022.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 17, 2023

Plan of correction: On 5/4/22, facility submitted acknowledgement of Title 22 regulations for reporting requirements 87211. POC was cleared on 5/6/22 by LPA

Feb 3, 2023Facility evaluation reportCase Management - OtherReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

On February 3, 2023, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Charitra conducted an unannounced visit and met with the Assistant Director of Health Services, Hazel Yabut and explained the purpose of the visit. The purpose of today's visit is to deliver an immediate exclusion letter to exclude an employee of the facility. The letter was given to the Assistant Director of Health Services. This report is reviewed and discussed with Assistant Director of Health Services. A copy is provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 3, 2023
Jan 27, 2023Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On January 27, 2023, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Charitra conducted an unannounced annual infection control inspection. LPA observed the COVID-19 signage posted on the door of the front lobby. LPA was screened at entry point and observed the visitor screening log documentation. LPA met with Director of Health Services (DHS), Amyda Astrero and Administrator, Robert Snee joined shortly thereafter. Administrator was able to provide screening log documentation for staff and residents to LPA. This facility is a locked memory care facility and the central entry point is the front lobby. LPA toured the facility and grounds. No accessible bodies of water or fire safety hazards observed. The facility has a total of four different buildings (Twin Pine, Oak, Bay, Cedar/Maple) for residents based on the level of care required. LPA toured the facility with Administrator and DHS and observed the library room. 30-day PPE supply was located in a closet in the library. All communal bathrooms throughout the facility was observed to be equipped with liquid soap, paper-towels, hand washing signs, and a trash can with a fitted lid. LPA toured all four buildings at the facility and observed it to be clean, odorless and free from any tripping hazards. A comfortable temperature of 70-73 degrees F is maintained and lighting is sufficient for comfort. There are a total of four dining rooms at the facility for residents; no toxins, chemicals, or sharps were observed present. LPA observed resident activities calendar posted in the hallways of the resident buildings. LPA observed two Wellness Centers located at the facility. Wellness Centers had medication locked and stored appropriately and inaccessible to residents. LPA observed the first aid kits in the wellness center to be present and completed. COVID signage was observed to be posted throughout the facility. During the visit, LPA observed staff wearing face masks. LPA observed 4 locked laundry rooms. Toxins and chemicals were observed to be locked and inaccessible to residents. LPA observed additional toxins and chemicals locked outside in the housekeeping storage room. LPA toured and observed the kitchen to be clean and observed 2 day perishable and 7 day non-perishable. There is a locked gate separating the kitchen and the housekeeping storage room from resident buildings. Infection control practices are observed: COVID signage posted throughout the facility, entry procedures, daily monitoring log for staff, residents and visitors, 30-day PPE supply, face coverings for staff, containment strategies, staff training and policies. No citations issued during the visit. Report is reviewed with Director of Health Services and a copy is provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 27, 2023

202212 state visits · 12 documents

Oct 17, 2022Facility evaluation reportCase Management - IncidentDeficiency page: Type A

Type of visit: Case Management - Incident

On October 17, 2022, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Charitra and Licensing Program Manager (LPM) Cara Smith conducted an unannounced case management visit to follow up on a visit made on October 10, 2022. LPA and LPM met with Director of Health Services (DHS), Amyda Astrero and Administrator, Robert Snee, joined shortly thereafter. LPA explained the purpose of the visit. On October 10, 2022, LPA conducted a case management visit to follow up on an un-witnessed incident that occurred on September 25, 2022 where Resident #2 (R2) was screaming and agitated and verbalized Resident #1 (R1) touched R2's breast and shook it. During the visit, LPA Charitra and LPM Smith toured the facility with DHS, Amyda Astrero and observed R1 sleeping in bed with his/her one on one caregiver in the room. LPA and LPM reviewed R1's file and needs and service plan. In addition, LPA Charitra and LPM Smith interviewed DHS and Administrator regarding R1. According to the Administrator and DHS, R1 has a new Geriatric doctor that has been in communication with the facility. In addition, it was indicated that R1 is on new medications prescribed by the new doctor. According to the file reviewed, R1 was admitted to the facility on May 3, 2022 and this incident is his/her fifth incident at the facility, three of which are of R1 displaying inappropriate behaviors towards female residents. In addition, based on R1's needs and service plan, R1 has a history and pattern of aggressive and inappropriate behaviors towards residents. Although facility has interventions in place, R1 has re-occurring incidents. Deficiency of the RCFE California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8 is observed and cited on a following page. Report is reviewed with Director of Health Services (DHS), Amyda Astrero and Administrator, Robert Snee, and a copy is provided with appeals rights.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 17, 2022

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87468.1(a)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Oct 18, 2022

87468.1 Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities: (a) Residents in all residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following personal rights:(2) To be accorded safe, healthful and comfortable accommodations, furnishings and equipment Violation of this regulation is not met as evidenced by: Based on the interviews conducted and the file reviewed, R1 has a history of aggressive and inappropirate behaviors towards other residents in care. Furthermore, due to R1's inappropriate behaviors, the facility environment is not comfortable for other residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 17, 2022

Plan of correction: In-service training with staff members in relation to reporting inappropriate behaviors. Facility will communicate with resident's physician regarding the behaviors being displayed

Oct 10, 2022Facility evaluation reportCase Management - IncidentReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Incident

On October 10, 2022, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Charitra conducted an unannounced case management visit to follow up on an incident that was reported to CCLD on October 3, 2022. LPA met with Director of Health Services, Amyda Astrero and Assistant Director of Health Services, Hazel Yabut and explained the purpose of the visit. The Licensee reported on September 25, 2022, Resident #1 (R1) and Resident #2 (R2) were found in R2's room. It was indicated R2 was agitated and screaming because R1 touched him/her. According to the Director of Health Services, R1 did not have a one on one caregiver assigned at this time. During the visit, LPA reviewed R1's file and interviewed staff. According to the file reviewed, R1 has a diagnosis of dementia. In addition, R1 has had a prior incident where R1 was found naked in another resident's bed. According to the interviewed staff, R1 has a new Geriatric doctor in which the facility has been in communication with daily, and R1's medications have been adjusted. In addition, Director of Health Services and Assistant Director of Health Services, indicated R1 has an one on one caregiver assigned around the clock and has notified all required parties. The facility had a care team meeting to discuss R1's behaviors and future care plans and has been in touch with R1's responsible party on a daily basis. No citations issued during the visit. LPA reviewed report with Director of Health Services, Amyda Astrero and Assistant Director of Health Services, Hazel Yabut and a copy is provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 10, 2022
Sep 23, 2022Facility evaluation reportCase Management - IncidentReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Incident

On September 23, 2022, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Charitra conducted an unannounced case management visit to follow up on incidents that were reported to CCLD. LPA met with Director of Health Services, Amyda Astrero and Assistant Director of Health Services, Hazel Yabut and explained the purpose of the visit. The Licensee reported on 9/7/22, Resident #1 (R1) and Resident #2 (R2) were heard yelling. Staff separated the resident and spoke to the residents. According to R1, he/she was hit on the left side of the chest by R2 and according to R2, R1 hit him/her on the arm. During the visit, LPA observed residents files and observed the residents. R1 was observed to be sleeping and R2 was observed to be eating lunch. Based on file reviewed, R1 and R2 has a diagnosis of Dementia. In addition, LPA reviewed R1's and R2's service plan and it indicated that facility is conducting behavior mapping and are keeping both residents apart from each other. The Licensee reported on 9/9/22, Resident #3 (R3's) one on one caregiver reported that R3 hit R2. According to the Licensee, it was indicated that the R3 said something to R2, however R2 did not acknowledge resulting to R3 throwing juice on R2 and punching him/her on the left side of the chest. According to the Director of Health Services, R3's one on one caregiver was also punched by R3. During the visit, LPA observed R3 having lunch and observed a male one on one caregiver present. Based on file reviewed, R3 has a diagnosis of dementia and has been assigned a one on one caregiver since admission based on physician and responsible party due to agitation and wandering behavior. LPA reviewed the needs and service plan for R3 and it indicates that physician adjusted his/her medication and behavior mapping is being conducted. In addition, the facility will ensure that there is a male one on one caregiver assigned to R3 at all times. On 9/11/22, the Licensee reported an unwitnessed incident that Resident #4 (R4) was pulling down his/her pants to urinate. Resident #5 (R5) yelled at R4 resulting to R4 becoming agitated and slapping R5 in the face. During the visit, LPA observed both residents to be eating lunch. Based on file reviewed, both residents have a diagnosis of dementia. According to the Director of Health Services, R4 had a medication adjustment and a urine analysis was done. Behavior mapping is being conducted for both R4 and R5. Report is reviewed with Director of Health Services and Assistant Director of Health Services and a copy is provided. No citations issued during the visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 23, 2022
Sep 12, 2022Facility evaluation reportCase Management - IncidentReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Incident

On September 12, 2022, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Charitra conducted an unannounced case management visit to follow up on an incident that was reported to CCLD on September 9, 2022. LPA met with Assistant Director of Health Services, Hazel Yabut and Administrator, Robert Snee. Director of Health Services, Amyda Astrero joined shortly thereafter. LPA explained the purpose of the visit. The Licensee reported on September 7, 2022, Resident #1 (R1) was observed to have jumped over the facility fence near the activity office using a planter. Staff assisted R1 up, however R1 attempted to run after his wife who had just visited. Staff redirected R1 back to the facility. No injuries were noted. During the visit, LPA observed R1 walking outside with his assigned one on one caregiver. LPA reviewed R1's files and interviewed staff. File reviewed indicates that R1 is a newly admitted resident that has a diagnosis of Parkinson's Dementia and is unable to leave the facility unassisted. According to the Director of Health Services, Amyda Astrero and Assistant Director of Health Services, the facility notified R1's responsible party and R1's physician as required. R1's physician adjusted R1's medications and a one on one caregiver was assigned. Behavior mapping is still being conducted on resident. No citations were issued during today's visit. LPA reviewed report with Director of Health Services and Assistant Director or Health Services and a copy is provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 12, 2022
Jul 19, 2022Facility evaluation reportCase Management - IncidentDeficiency page: Type B

Type of visit: Case Management - Incident

On July 19, 2022, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Charitra conducted an unannounced case management visit to follow up on an incident that was reported to CCLD. LPA met with Interim Administrator, Robert Snee and Director of Resident and Family Services, Kate Rickard and explained the purpose of the visit. The Licensee reported on July 15, 2022, Resident #1 (R1) was observed by a caregiver laying besides Resident #2 (R2), who was fully clothed and sleeping during the time. Caregiver immediately redirected R1 and called for additional help. During the case management visit, LPA observed R1 eating lunch in the dining room with his/her private caregiver. In addition, during the visit, LPA interviewed staff and reviewed R1's file. According to R1's file reviewed, R1 has a diagnosis of dementia. Interviewed staff indicated that a private caregiver was assigned to R1, and R1 will have a full work up conducted on 7/20/22 by R1's primary care physician. It was also indicated that R1's medications will be adjusted. This is the second unusual behavior involving R1, as the other incident occurred on 5/26/22, where R1 was found in a female resident's room. (see LIC809 dated 6/16/2022). Due to staff's lack of supervision, R1 a dementia resident, was able to walk into R2's room and lay besides him/her. Deficiency of the RCFE California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8 is observed and cited on a following page. Report is reviewed with Interim Administrator, Robert Snee and a copy is provided with the appeals rights.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 19, 2022

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87464(f)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Jul 26, 2022

87464(f)(1) Basic Services(f)- Basic services shall at a minimum include: (1) Care and supervision as defined in Section 87101(c)(3) and Health and Safety Code section 1569.2(c). Violation of this regulation is not met as evidenced by: Based on the file reviewed and interviews conducted, R1 has a diagnosis of dementia. In addition, staff were aware of R1's prior history of unusual behavior that occurred on 5/26/22 but failed to ensure another unusual incident involving R1 will occur.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 19, 2022

Plan of correction: Facility will continue to consult responsible party and physicians regarding medication adjustment and changes in condition. Facility assigned R1 a private caregiver. Facility contacted physician for medication adjustment. A full work up will be conducted by R1's phsycian on 7/20/22.

Jul 18, 2022Facility evaluation reportCase Management - IncidentDeficiency page: Type B

Type of visit: Case Management - Incident

On July 18, 2022, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Charitra conducted an unannounced case management visit to follow up on an incident that occurred on July 11, 2022. LPA met with Staffing Coordinator, Maria Miller and Director or Resident and Family Services, Kate Rickard joined shortly thereafter. LPA explained the purpose of the visit. The Licensee reported on July 11, 2022, Resident #1 (R1) was observed by a caregiver (S1) climbing over the facility gate. S1 immediately ran towards R1 and called for help. R1 was already on the other side of the gate by the time S1 got to the gate. R1 was observed outside the community, walking up the hill to the twin pine park. Staff members followed R1 and tried redirecting him/her to the facility, however R1 refused. Medications were administered to R1 and R1 became cooperative and returned back to the community. During the visit, LPA reviewed R1's files and interviewed staff. Files reviewed indicated that R1 has a diagnosis of Alzheimer's Dementia and is unable to leave the facility unassisted. According to the staff interviewed, R1 is a newly admitted resident and has a history of elopement from previous facility. According to R1's file, R1 eloped from a facility by climbing a 10ft wall. The facility notified responsible party and R1's physician. R1's physician adjusted R1's medications and a one on one caregiver was assigned. Deficiency of the RCFE California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8 is observed and cited on a following page. Report is reviewed with Staffing Coordinator, Maria Miller and Director or Resident and Family Services, Kate Rickard and a copy is provided with appeals rights.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 18, 2022

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87464(f)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Jul 25, 2022

87464(f)(1) Basic Services(f)- Basic services shall at a minimum include: (1) Care and supervision as defined in Section 87101(c)(3) and Health and Safety Code section 1569.2(c). Violation of this regulation is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews conducted and file reviewed, although R1 is a newly admitted resident, R1 has a history of elopement from his/her previous facility by climbing a wall. In addition, file reviewed indicated R1 has a diagnosis of Alzheimer's dementia and is unable to leave the facility unassisted.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 18, 2022

Plan of correction: Facility will conduct a drill regarding elopmenet. The facility will conduct in-service training regarding the importance of resident history and using it to implement a proper care plan

Jul 5, 2022Facility evaluation reportCase Management - IncidentDeficiency page: Type B

Type of visit: Case Management - Incident

On July 5, 2022, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Charitra conducted an unannounced case management visit to follow up on an incident that was reported to CCLD on June 24, 2022. LPA met with Assistant Director of Health Services, Hazel Yabut and explained the purpose of the visit. The licensee reported on June 19, 2022, Staff #1 (S1) indicated that Resident #1 (R1) may have eaten cat food. Staff found empty food bowls for cats in R1's room. According to the facility, there were no signs and symptoms of pain notes. During the visit, LPA reviewed R1's file and spoke to the assistant director of health services. According to the file reviewed, R1 has a diagnosis of dementia. According to the staff interviewed, there were no witnesses during the time of the incident so the facility is unaware whether resident ate the cat food. In addition, interviewed staff indicated that when staff went into R1's room, R1 had food bowls stacked in his/her room. R1 would not say if he/she ate the cat food or not. According to the Assistant Director of Health Services, the facility moved R1 to another neighborhood due to R1 needing higher level of care. Facility also removed all cat food bowls so it is not visible to other residents. Deficiency of the RCFE California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8 is observed and cited on a following page. Report is reviewed with Assistant Director of Health Services, Hazel Yabut and a copy is provided with appeals rights.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 5, 2022

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87464(f)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Jul 12, 2022

87464(f)(1) Basic Services(f)- Basic services shall at a minimum include: (1) Care and supervision as defined in Section 87101(c)(3) and Health and Safety Code section 1569.2(c). Violation of this regulation is not met as evidenced by: Based on the file reviewed and interview conducted, the facility did not ensure basic services were being met, due to lack of supervision, R1 possibly eating cat food. In addition, there were no witenesses during the time of the incident so facility is unaware if R1 ate cat food which poses a potential health, safety and personal rights risk to residents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 5, 2022

Plan of correction: The Executive Director and/or designee will provide caregiver training regarding supervision to prevent this from happening again and will submit a copy of the lesson plan and the sign-in sheet to CCL by 7/12/22.

Jun 16, 2022Facility evaluation reportCase Management - IncidentReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Incident

On June 16, 2022, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Charitra conducted an unannounced case management visit to follow up on incidents that were reported to CCLD. LPA met with Assistant Director of Health Services, Hazel Yabut, and explained the purpose of the visit. The Licensee reported that resident (R1) had three separate incidents; one on 5/27/22 and two on May 30, 2022. On 5/27/22, it was reported that R1 hit an agency caregiver (S1) in the face, causing both R1 and S1 to fall to the floor. In addition, it was indicated that during this incident, a second caregiver (S2) present was knocked to the floor after attempting to redirect R1. On May 30, 2022, it was reported that R1 touched a caregiver (S3) while giving R1 a shower in the morning. Later in the day, it was reported that R1 touched another resident (R2). During the case management, LPA interviewed staff and reviewed R1's file. According to the file reviewed and the interviews conducted, R1 is a newly admitted resident with a diagnosis of Dementia with behavioral disturbances. In addition, LPA reviewed R1's service plan and it indicates that R1's medications were adjusted, facility implemented frequent checks and has assigned R1 with two caregivers to be present when providing care. On 5/26/22, the licensee reported a male resident (R3) walked into a female resident's room (R2); no injuries were reported. During the visit, LPA observed the residents and reviewed R3's file and interviewed staff. According to file reviewed, R3 has a diagnosis of dementia. Interviewed staff indicated that R3 does not have any prior history of unusual behavior. Based on R3's needs and services, the facility implemented frequent checks to prevent this incident from happening again. LPA reviewed this report with the Assistant Director of Health Services, Hazel Yabut; a copy is providedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 16, 2022
May 24, 2022Facility evaluation reportCase Management - IncidentDeficiency page: Type B

Type of visit: Case Management - Incident

On May 24, 2022, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) conducted an unannounced case management visit. LPA met with interim Administrator, Robert Snee, and Director of Health Services, Glynis Marcantel joined shortly thereafter. LPA explained the purpose of the visit. The licensee reported on May 13, 2022, Resident (R1) was observed by the front receptionist to be walking toward the main office. According to R1, it was indicated at first that he/she jumped over the fence, however R1 then stated he/she had walked through the gate. There were no injures noted. During the case management visit, LPA interviewed staff and reviewed R1's files. According to the file reviewed, it indicates that R1 has dementia and is unable to leave the facility unassisted. According to the staff interviewed, it was indicated that the latch on the gate may not have been latched all the way resulting to R1 walking out of the facility. Facility immediately conducted a head count of all residents and checked to ensure all the gates were locked. In addition, the facility had a locksmith company come and perform an inspection of all gates to ensure they were locked and latched properly, however, these precautions were conducted after R1 was able to leave the facility. Section 87411(a) Personnel Requirements, requires that facility personnel shall at all times be sufficient in numbers, and competent to provide the services necessary care and supervision to meet resident needs. In the above incident, there was an absence of supervision resulting in a resident leaving the facility. 87411(a) Personnel Requirements- $500 CIVIL PENALTY ASSESSED FOR REPEAT VIOLATION WITHIN 12 MONTHS on 2/24/2022. Deficiency of the RCFE California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8 is observed and cited on a following page. Report is reviewed with Robert Snee, and Glynis Marcantel and a copy will be provided with appeals rights.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 24, 2022

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87411(a) · Plan of correction due date: May 31, 2022

87411 Personnel Requirements: (a) acility personnel shall at all times be sufficient in numbers, and competent to provide the services necessary to meet resident needs... Violation of this regulation is not met as evidence by: Based on staff interviews and file reviewed, it was indicated that Resident (R1) has dementia and is unable to leave the facility unassisted. In addition, it was indicated that there was no staff member who observed R1 leave the facility until R1 was observed walking toward the main office. Nevertheless, there wa no staff member present to supervise the resident. This poses a potentional health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 24, 2022

Plan of correction: Facility will have all staff members enter and exit from the main office. Staff will also be reminded to ensure gates are latched all the way if they go through the gates.

May 5, 2022Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility is not following COVID protocols

On May 5, 2022, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Charitra conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver the above allegation. LPA met with interim Administrator, Robert Snee, and Director of Health Services, Glynis Marcantel joined shortly therafter. LPA explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation that facility is not following COVID protocols, the complainant alleged that residents who had tested COVID positive were able to roam around the facility, dine and commingle with COVID negative residents. During the investigation, LPA reviewed facility COVID mitigation plan and interviewed staff members and it was indicated that there is a dedicated isolation unit at the facility for those who test positive for COVID, however the Administrator at the time did not want to move the positive residents, reserving the isolation area for residents who required higher level of care. In addition, interviewed staff indicated that because the residents have dementia, it was difficult to isolate them in their rooms, but the facility staff did try to ensure the positive residents were not in close proximity to the negative residents. Based on the documentation collected and interviews conducted, the facility failed to follow COVID protocols, therefore the preponderance of evidence standard has been met; therefore, this allegation is Substantiated. Deficiency of the Residential Care Elderly California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6 is observed and cited on a LIC 9099D. Failure to correct the deficiencies may result in civil penalties. Report reviewed with the interim Administrator and the Director of Health Services and a copy is provided with the appeals rights is provided. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 5, 2022 · control 14-AS-20220217094555

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87303(a) · Plan of correction due date: May 12, 2022

87303 Maintenance and Operation: (a) The facility shall be clean, safe, sanitary and in good repair at all times. Maintenance shall include ... services and procedures for the safety and well-being of residents, employees and visitors. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on the documentation collected and interviews conducted, the facility failed to isolate COVID positive residents in the designated isolation unit at the facility. In addition interviewed staff indicated that because residents have dementia, it was difficult to isolate residents in their rooms but staff did try to ensure the positive residents were not in close proximity to the negative residents. This poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 5, 2022

Plan of correction: Administrator or designated staff to conduct an in-staff training in relation to COVID-19 protocols. Facility to submit an updated LIC808 Mitigation Plan for CCLD's approval IF facility has changed their covid mitigation plan.

Apr 29, 2022Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Private caregiver was not associated to the facility while providing care to resident Facility failed to report to Licensing as required

On April 29, 2022, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Charitra conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver the findings for the above allegations. LPA met with Director of Health Services, Glynis Marcantel, and explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation that a private caregiver was not associated to the facility while providing care to a resident (R1): The private caregiver has been working at the facility for about 3 months. Although, the private caregiver was fingerprint cleared to work at the facility, the facility failed to associate the private caregiver. According to the staff interviewed, it was acknowledged that the facility was not aware they have to associate staff who were hired privately. Based on the information and documentation collected, the private caregiver was never associated to Silverado Senior Living-Belmont Hills. The preponderance of evidence standard has been met; therefore, this allegation is Substantiated. This violation results in a civil penalty of $100 per day x 10 days = $1,000 Regarding the allegation that the facility failed to report to Licensing as required, on February 13, 2022, a private caregiver allegedly kicked a resident (R1) while providing care to him/her. Belmont Police Department responded to the incident and a report was taken the same day. Licensing became aware of this incident on February 16, 2022, 3 days after the incident took place. According to Title 22 Regulations, 87211, Reporting Requirements, the facility is required to notify Licensing and the Local Ombudsman within 24 hours of any suspected physical abuse of an elder. (CONT. TO 9099C). Substantiated In addition, the facility is required to send Licensing a written report within seven days of the occurrence of any of the events indicated in Title 22 Regulation 87211(a)(1), (A) through (D). During the investigation, LPA was not given any proof of the facility reporting the incident between R1 and the private caregiver as required. Nevertheless, the facility failed to notify Licensing with 24 hours of the elder abuse and failed to provide Licensing a written report of the incident within 7 days. Based on the information collected, it was determined that the facility failed to report to Licensing as required. The preponderance of evidence standard has been met; therefore, the above allegation is determined to be Substantiated. Deficiency of the Residential Care Elderly California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6 is observed and cited on a LIC 9099D. Failure to correct the deficiencies may result in civil penalties. Report was reviewed with Director of Health Services, Glynis Marcantel and a copy is provided with appeals right.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 29, 2022 · control 14-AS-20220216135656

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87355(e)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Apr 30, 2022

Criminal Record Clearance (e) All individuals subject to a criminal record review pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 1569.17(b) shall prior to working, residing or volunteering in a licensed facility: (2) Request a transfer of a criminal record clearance as specified in Section 87355(c) Violation of this regulation is not met as evidence by: Based on record review and information collected, it was indicated that although the private caregiver was fingerprint cleared, the facility failed to associate the caregiver to the facility. In addition, the facility was unaware they had to associate staff who were hired privately.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 29, 2022

Plan of correction: Private caregiver no longer works at the facility. Facility will start associating all staff members moving foward, including privately hired caregivers and agency caregivers. Immediate civil penalty of $1,000 was issued today. $100 x 10 days = $1,000

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87211(a)(1) · Plan of correction due date: May 6, 2022

87211 Reporting Requirements: (a) Each licensee shall furnish to the licensing agency such reports as the Department may require, including, but not limited to, the following: (1) A written report shall be submitted to the licensing agency and to the person responsible for the resident within seven days of the occurrence of any of the events specified in (A) through (D) below… Violation of this regulation is not met as evidenced by: Facility failed to report an incident that occurred on February 13, 2022 as required to Licensing. In addition, facility failed to submit a written report within 7 days of the occurrence date of the incident.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 29, 2022

Plan of correction: Facility administrator to submit acknowledgement ot Title 22 Regulations for 87211(a), Reporting Requiements.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87211(b) · Plan of correction due date: May 6, 2022

87211 Reporting Requirements: (b) Any suspected physical abuse that results in serious bodily injury of an elder or dependent adult shall be reported to the local ombudsman, the corresponding licensing agency, and the local law enforcement agency within two (2) hours as required by Welfare and Institutions Code Section 15630(b)(1). Violation of this regulation is not met as evidence by: Facility failed to report an incident of alledged abuse that occurred on February 13, 2022 as required to Licensing. This poses a potential health and safety risk for residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 29, 2022

Plan of correction: Facility administrator to submit acknowledgement ot Title 22 Regulations for 87211(b), Reporting Requiements.

Feb 24, 2022Facility evaluation reportCase Management - IncidentDeficiency page: Type B

Type of visit: Case Management - Incident

On February 24, 2022, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Charitra conducted an unannounced case management visit regarding an Incident Report. LPA was greeted by the Director of Resident and Family Services, Diane Sapienza-Boundy, and the Director of Health Services, Glynis Marcantel, joined shortly thereafter. LPA Charitra explained the purpose of the visit. The licensee reported that on January 19, 2022, two residents were involved in an unwitnessed altercation. The staff walked into the library and saw a resident on the floor (R1). Another resident (R2) was trying to make a phone call and Resident (R1) attempted to grab the receiver. Somehow R2 hit R1 with the receiver. During the case management, LPA observed R1 being changed in her bed and R2, in the dining hall watching television. LPA interviewed staff and reviewed both resident’s files. According to the files reviewed and the documentation collected indicates that R1 has a diagnosis of Dementia with behavioral disturbances while R2 has a diagnosis of Alzheimer’s and Pseudobulbar. This is the second altercation involving R1 without any staff being present since November 2021 (see LIC809 dated 11/15/2021). In November was reported that staff had left R1 and another resident alone in the dining room, and when staff walked in observed that R1 was kicking the other resident. The report of January 19, involving R1 and R2 noted above, indicate that there was no staff member around or physically present in the library supervising the residents. The licensee has indicated that no one-on-one supervision is provided unless it is paid by the resident; however, Regulation requires the licensee to provide sufficient staff to meet the residents’ care and supervision. In the above incidents, there was an absence of supervision resulting in altercation between residents. Deficiency of the RCFE California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8 is observed and cited on a following page. Report is reviewed with Glynis Marcantel and a copy will be provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 24, 2022

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87411(a) · Plan of correction due date: Mar 3, 2022

Personnel Requirements: Facility personnel shall at all times be sufficient in numbers... to provide the services necessary to meet resident needs...Sufficient support staff shall be employed to ensure provision of personal assistance and care as required in Section 87608.... The licensing agency may require any facility to provide additional staff whenever it determines through documentation that the needs of the particular residents, the extent of services provided, or the physical arrangements of the facility require such additional staff for the provision of adequate services. Violation of this regulation is evidence by staff interviews indicating that R1 and R2, both with dementia, were alone in the library without a staff member present to supervise the residents. Staff were aware of R1’s aggressive behaviors due to 2 prior altercations involving R1; November 10, 2021 and January 18, 2022 but failed to provide additional supervision. Although it was acknowledged by the facility that R1 demonstrates violent and aggressive behaviors, and the goal will be to ensure R1 does not cause injury to self or others, the facility failed to provide an appropriate intervention to identify R1’s needs in order to avoid similar behavioral and physical situations moving forward.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 24, 2022

Plan of correction: Facility will enhance monitoring and supervision with R1. Facility will address aggressive behaviors with R1's responsible party. Facility will

20212 state visits · 4 documents

Nov 15, 2021Facility evaluation reportCase Management - IncidentReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Incident

On November 15, 2021, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Charitra conducted an unannounced Case Management visit regarding an Incident Report that was received on November 10, 2021. LPA was greeted by the Administrator, Joan Newman and the Director of Health Services, Glynis Marcantel joined shortly thereafter. LPA Charitra explained the purpose of the visit During today's inspection LPA observed the residents. Residents were observed to be in the dining room together at this time. LPA interviewed staff and reviewed resident documents and the admission agreement. According to the admission agreement, the residents are able to remain independent, roam around the facility and actively engage in the community alone. According to the Incident Report, Resident 1 (R1) was observed to be kicking Resident 2 (R2). Residents have a diagnosis of Dementia with Behavioral Disturbances and were left alone in the dining room when the incident occurred. Based on the Administrator and the Director of Health Services, this was a one time altercation between the residents, no prior history of physical abuse. The facility does not provide one on one care to the residents unless stated otherwise. LPA reviewed the Needs and Service Plan for both R1 and R2 and it states residents do not require hands on assistance. Facility informed Ombudsman, Licensing, Physicians, and the resident's Responsible Party regarding this Incident. No deficiencies were issued. Report was reviewed with Administratorthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 15, 2021
Nov 12, 2021Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident sustained unexplained injuries while in care

On this day at 1100hrs Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Jaime Vado and Komal Charitra conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the allegation received. LPAs met with resident serviced direct Glynnis regarding the findings. During course of the investigation LPA discovered that the resident was discovered with the unexplained injury at the same time as another staff person. Resident had an injury and was in bed. Resdient observation rounds were being made and in between rounds a fall may have ocurred and was assisted to bed by another resident. Staff do not help residents during a fall unless assisted by a nurse. Facility reported the fall to the regional office and the injury was diagnosed at the hospital. Based on these observations, the above allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the above allegations are unsubstantiated at this time. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 12, 2021 · control 14-AS-20210714115037

The state marks this report as 2 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 1. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

Nov 12, 2021Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are not assisting resident with hygiene needs Resident's bathroom was dirty and malodorous Linens were not provided for resident's bed Food served to residents not of the quality to meet their needs

On this day at 1100hrs Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Jaime Vado and Komal Charitra conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the allegations received. LPAs met with resident serviced direct Glynis Marcantel regarding the findings. During the course of the investigation LPA Vado conducted made facility observations and observed R1 and her room. LPA Vado made additional observations on this day regarding resident foods and observed the buildings and grounds including resident rooms and the room of R1. R1 was observed in her bed during these observations and did not want to get out of bed. Linens are in place during these observations. The restroom of R1 was observed but LPA did not detect any odors or see any unwashed resident items in the restroom. LPA observed lunch was and saw many fresh food items served to residents such as salad, salmon, brown rice, vegetables, and fruit. LPA also inspected facility food supplies and menu and observed all are in place. During observations R1 did appear clean in clothing and hygiene needs. LPA asked about hygiene concerns and facility is able to meet her needs and R1 mostly complies when it comes to daily hygiene. Facility cannot force resident to wash hair or cut These allegations are unsubstatiated. Based on these observations, the above allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the above allegations are unsubstantiated at this time. Report is reveiwed with Glenis Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 12, 2021 · control 14-AS-20210707130755

The state marks this report as 2 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 1. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

Nov 12, 2021Facility evaluation reportCase Management - OtherReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

On this day at 1100hrs, Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Jaime Vado and Komal Charitra conducted an unannounced prelicensing inspection visit. LPAs met with diector of health services Glynis Marcantel and director of plant operations Gary and explained the purpose of today's inspection. LPAs toured the facility's buildings and grounds. Entire facility has hardwired smoke detectors and fire panel. Fire panel last inspected on 11/01/2021 and sprinklers last inspected on 11/02/2021 of which both are in full service. Facility does contain an emergency generator that will power facility for 72 hours. LPAs toured resident buildings. Twin Pines building is inspected. Room 507 was observed and water was tested at 116F. Room is fully furnished with appropriate lighting and furniture. Room is equipped with push button call system. Shower is clean and contains non-skid mat and grab bars. Fire extinguisher in dining room last inspected on 10/2021 and is charged ready for use. Carbon monoxide detector is present. Oak building is inspected. Room 405 and 411 were observed. Water was tested at 117F. Room is fully furnished with appropriate lighting and furniture. Room is equipped with push button call system. Shower is clean and contains non-skid mat and grab bars. Carbon monoxide detector is present. Maple building is inspected. Room 307 was observed and water was tested at 108F. Room is fully furnished with appropriate lighting and furniture. Room is equipped with push button call system. Shower is clean and contains non-skid mat and grab bars. Fire extinguisher in hall was last inspected on 10/2021. This building also contains resident incontinence supplies and some COVID related PPE. Carbon monoxide detector is present. Cedar building is inspected. Room 212 was observed and water was tested at 115F. Room is fully furnished with appropriate lighting and furniture. Room is equipped with push button call system. Shower is clean and contains non-skid mat and grab bars. Carbon monoxide detector is present. Additional COVID related PPE are located in a shed in the exterior area of the facility and in a closet in the library. Kitchen is inspected as well as fresh, frozen foods, and emergency food supplies. All food supplies are in place. Kitchen hood is due for cleaning and service on November 2021 but facility already has this scheduled to be conducted. Kitchen cooking range is due for cleaning as well as it was observed needing service. Cooking range and oven are operating. Facility has two wellness rooms which house the resident medications. These are observed and medications are properly stored and locked inaccessible to residents. Each resident building is equipped with a dining room and supplies are stored in refrigerators for resident use as well as juice and dining supplies. Sharps are not stored in these dining rooms. Facility is in compliance with Title 22 regulations. No citations are issued. Report is reviewed with Glenis.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 12, 2021

88 of 112 beds were occupied at the July 31, 2025 state visit — a count on that day, not an opening.

License holder

Subtenant 1301 Ralston Ave; Silverado Sr Lvg Mgt, licensed since 2013.

The state’s totals for this licenseSince 2013, as the state’s facility page counts them
State visits on file
46
Total complaints
6
Substantiated allegations
4
Type A citations
1
Type B citations
2

These are the state’s own totals for this license since 2013, per CDSS records. The state counts them apart from the documents above, and they can differ from what those documents show; the documents say what each visit found. One complaint can contain several allegations.

Compare with homes the same size
This homeTypical
Type A citations10
Type B citations21
Substantiated allegations42
Total complaints66

“Typical” is the statewide median for licensed homes this size. It does not adjust for years licensed, and older licenses have had more visits and reports. The median is across the 1,354 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record. The figures compared are the state’s totals, not the documents.

What the state’s words mean
Routine visita visit the state records as “Required” — a scheduled visit, not one made in answer to a complaintSubstantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents stand in their place.

Open CDSS facility search ↗Report a record errorOperate this home? Respond or correct, free →
Frequently asked questions

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Silverado Senior Living - Belmont Hills

Is Silverado Senior Living - Belmont Hills licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

How many residents is Silverado Senior Living - Belmont Hills licensed for?

112 residents — a large community, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

Has Silverado Senior Living - Belmont Hills been cited?

1 Type A and 2 Type B citations since 2013, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. Those records count 46 state visits over the same years.

Is Silverado Senior Living - Belmont Hills still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of November 11, 2026.

What does Silverado Senior Living - Belmont Hills cost?

$13,350 a month to start — listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026.

The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly, seen September 9, 2026.

Among 21 other homes of a similar licensed size across San Mateo County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,988 to $7,686 a month, and the middle figure is $6,274 (n = 21 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date between September and October 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Silverado Senior Living - Belmont Hills take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Subtenant 1301 Ralston Ave; Silverado Sr Lvg Mgt, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. See the homes licensed to Silverado Sr Lvg Mgt — at least 3 on the state roster.

Is there a hospital nearby?

San Mateo Medical Center is 1.5 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Silverado Senior Living - Belmont Hills keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 25 residents, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

Silverado Senior Living - Belmont Hills license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “SILVERADO SENIOR LIVING - BELMONT HILLS”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #415600869. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • Licensed for 112 residents — a large community, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • Licensed to Subtenant 1301 Ralston Ave; Silverado Sr Lvg Mgt, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2013, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • 46 state inspection visits since 2013, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • 1 Type A and 2 Type B citations on file since 2013, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. The same records count 46 state visits in that period.
  • 6 complaints and 4 substantiated allegations on file since 2013, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is October 12, 2026, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Nearby

Other homes nearby

Licensed homes near this one in San Mateo County, most information on file first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

  • Map

    Belmont · 0.8 mi

    Ivy Park of Belmont

    Large community · licensed for 117

    Starting rate

    $5,995 a month to start

    Listed by the home on its own website · October 27, 2026

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Dementia: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record
  • Map

    San Carlos · 1.2 mi

    Bayview Villa

    Mid-size home · licensed for 47

    Starting rate

    $8,700 a month to start

    Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
  • Map

    Belmont · 0.3 mi

    Cogir of Belmont

    Large community · licensed for 68

    Estimated starting rate

    $7,050 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $5,500–$9,000

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Dementia: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
  • Map

    San Carlos · 1.0 mi

    Peninsula Elderly Care Home - Laurelwood

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Starting rate

    $7,500 a month to start

    Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record
  • Map

    San Carlos · 1.2 mi

    Chestnut House

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Starting rate

    $6,000 a month to start

    Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
  • Map

    San Mateo · 1.2 mi

    Pacific Care Home IV

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $6,900 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $5,700–$8,500

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record

Street maps © Protomaps · © OpenStreetMap

Explore San Mateo County ↗

Do you run this home?

Add your photos, care details, and contact information. Your public profile is free.

Claim this home
Visiting in person? Print a visit sheetHow we source information
CallAsk this home
SS

Call Silverado Senior Living - Belmont Hills

Belmont · Licensed for 112

(650) 654-9700

From the state licensing record · October 26, 2026

From the home’s website, silverado.com:

(424) 257-6418 · admissions line · seen October 27, 2026

or

Let us do the legwork

  • We ask about availability, price and the care you describe.
  • If it’s a fit, you choose whether they call you. Either way, you get every answer.
Check availabilityFree

Ask Silverado Senior Living - Belmont Hills

Check availability

Request a tour

More days
  • AskThe cost, or your own question

Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.

Covelight Care

A free directory of every licensed care home in California, built from CDSS public records.

Find your next step

Find a homeSaved homesHelp me chooseCheck a home

Make sense of care

Care guidesMedi-Cal & careYour rightsHow we workAbout this site

Work with Covelight

For professionalsFor home operatorsSuggest a correctionDevelopersContact us

© 2026 Covelight Care LLC. Homes never pay to appear or rank higher.

Covelight Care is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the sources named on this page.

3104 O St Unit #1023, Sacramento, CA 95816

PrivacyTermsText messages