Silverado Senior Living - Belmont Hills is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Belmont, San Mateo County, California — state license #415600869, licensed for 112 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 42 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated March 24, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

19 homes in view

Silverado Senior Living - Belmont Hills

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 112 residents · Belmont, CA · San Mateo County
LicensedMemory careHospiceBedriddenWheelchair not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #415600869, held since 2013 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
1301 Ralston Ave · Belmont, San Mateo County
Phone
(650) 654-9700
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryNot on file — ask the home
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careApproved for 25 residents
Bedridden careApproved for 112 residents

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. ALL MAY BE BEDRIDDEN.DEMENTIA SPECIAL CARE WITH DELAYED EGRESS. LOCKED PERIMETER IS PERMITTED. LICENSE IS SUBJECT TO TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 25 RESIDENTS. * MEDICAL OFFICE NOT PART OF THE LICENSED FACILITY. *State service designation983 - RCFE / DEMENTIAthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 46 times and filed 42 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated March 24, 2026.

Most recent state visit
March 24, 2026
Occupancy at the July 31, 2025 visit
88 of 112 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 5 documents with transcribed findings, dated November 12, 2021 to July 31, 2025. 5 of the 5 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (2), “Unsubstantiated” (3). 5 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 5 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 21 of 42 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20262 state visits · 2 documents
Mar 24, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 5, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20258 state visits · 10 documents
Dec 29, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Dec 29, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 8, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 16, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 5, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 31, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident sustained pressure injuries in care. Due to staff neglect, resident was dehydrated.

On July 31, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Curley conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver the findings for the above allegations. LPA met with Director of Health Services, Amyda Astrero and explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation, resident sustained pressure injuries in care, according to the reporting party, Resident 1 (R1) was admitted to the hospital on February 19th with open wounds on both heels. R1 had deep tissue pressure injury on the left heel and a wound on the right heel. During the investigation, LPA interviewed staff, reviewed R1’s file and reviewed medical records. Based on charting notes reviewed, on 2/15/25, the facility reported a right heel wound to R1’s physician and R1’s responsible party. According to R1’s responsible party, it was noted that R1 has a history of pressure ulcer. According to interviewed staff, R1’s physician sent a referral to home health wound nurse, however on 2/19/25, R1 was sent to the ER and was tolthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 31, 2025 · control 14-AS-20250320161225
Jul 31, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 4, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 27, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 25, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20244 state visits · 4 documents
Dec 3, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 15, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 16, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 31, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20235 state visits · 5 documents
Dec 19, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Dec 6, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 29, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 7, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 18, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations1typical 1
Type B citations2typical 1
Substantiated complaints4typical 2
Total complaints6typical 7
State visits on file46typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2013.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20262202025810020244402023101002022121222021240
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$6,000$9,000 /mo
our estimate — San Mateo County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Ask how the 2022 complaint investigation report was corrected — what changed?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (650) 654-9700

Is Silverado Senior Living - Belmont Hills licensed?

Yes — Silverado Senior Living - Belmont Hills is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Belmont (San Mateo County): California license #415600869, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 112 residents. State records list 42 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated March 24, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Silverado Senior Living - Belmont Hills care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Silverado Senior Living - Belmont Hills with clearances for dementia / memory care, hospice care, and bedridden; it does not list wheelchair / non-ambulatory. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. ALL MAY BE BEDRIDDEN.DEMENTIA SPECIAL CARE WITH DELAYED EGRESS. LOCKED PERIMETER IS PERMITTED. LICENSE IS SUBJECT TO TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 25 RESIDENTS. * MEDICAL OFFICE NOT PART OF THE LICENSED FACILITY. *

How much does Silverado Senior Living - Belmont Hills cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Silverado Senior Living - Belmont Hills's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in San Mateo County typically runs $6,000–$9,000/mo and small board-and-care homes $5,000–$8,000/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Silverado Senior Living - Belmont Hills accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Silverado Senior Living - Belmont Hills is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

88 of 112 beds occupied (79%) when the state visited on July 31, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Silverado Senior Living - Belmont Hills?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 46 state visits and 42 dated documents since 2021 for Silverado Senior Living - Belmont Hills; 5 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated July 31, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

5 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident sustained pressure injuries in care. Due to staff neglect, resident was dehydrated.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On July 31, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Curley conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver the findings for the above allegations. LPA met with Director of Health Services, Amyda Astrero and explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation, resident sustained pressure injuries in care, according to the reporting party, Resident 1 (R1) was admitted to the hospital on February 19th with open wounds on both heels. R1 had deep tissue pressure injury on the left heel and a wound on the right heel. During the investigation, LPA interviewed staff, reviewed R1’s file and reviewed medical records. Based on charting notes reviewed, on 2/15/25, the facility reported a right heel wound to R1’s physician and R1’s responsible party. According to R1’s responsible party, it was noted that R1 has a history of pressure ulcer. According to interviewed staff, R1’s physician sent a referral to home health wound nurse, however on 2/19/25, R1 was sent to the ER and was tolCDSS inspection report, July 31, 2025 · control 14-AS-20250320161225

2022

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility is not following COVID protocols
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On May 5, 2022, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Charitra conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver the above allegation. LPA met with interim Administrator, Robert Snee, and Director of Health Services, Glynis Marcantel joined shortly therafter. LPA explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation that facility is not following COVID protocols, the complainant alleged that residents who had tested COVID positive were able to roam around the facility, dine and commingle with COVID negative residents. During the investigation, LPA reviewed facility COVID mitigation plan and interviewed staff members and it was indicated that there is a dedicated isolation unit at the facility for those who test positive for COVID, however the Administrator at the time did not want to move the positive residents, reserving the isolation area for residents who required higher level of care. In addition, interviewed staff indicated that because the residents have dementia, it wasCDSS inspection report, May 5, 2022 · control 14-AS-20220217094555
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedPrivate caregiver was not associated to the facility while providing care to resident Facility failed to report to Licensing as required
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On April 29, 2022, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Charitra conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver the findings for the above allegations. LPA met with Director of Health Services, Glynis Marcantel, and explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation that a private caregiver was not associated to the facility while providing care to a resident (R1): The private caregiver has been working at the facility for about 3 months. Although, the private caregiver was fingerprint cleared to work at the facility, the facility failed to associate the private caregiver. According to the staff interviewed, it was acknowledged that the facility was not aware they have to associate staff who were hired privately. Based on the information and documentation collected, the private caregiver was never associated to Silverado Senior Living-Belmont Hills. The preponderance of evidence standard has been met; therefore, this allegation is Substantiated. This violation results iCDSS inspection report, April 29, 2022 · control 14-AS-20220216135656

2021

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident sustained unexplained injuries while in care
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On this day at 1100hrs Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Jaime Vado and Komal Charitra conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the allegation received. LPAs met with resident serviced direct Glynnis regarding the findings. During course of the investigation LPA discovered that the resident was discovered with the unexplained injury at the same time as another staff person. Resident had an injury and was in bed. Resdient observation rounds were being made and in between rounds a fall may have ocurred and was assisted to bed by another resident. Staff do not help residents during a fall unless assisted by a nurse. Facility reported the fall to the regional office and the injury was diagnosed at the hospital. Based on these observations, the above allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the above allegations are unsubstantiaCDSS inspection report, November 12, 2021 · control 14-AS-20210714115037
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are not assisting resident with hygiene needs Resident's bathroom was dirty and malodorous Linens were not provided for resident's bed Food served to residents not of the quality to meet their needs
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On this day at 1100hrs Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Jaime Vado and Komal Charitra conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the allegations received. LPAs met with resident serviced direct Glynis Marcantel regarding the findings. During the course of the investigation LPA Vado conducted made facility observations and observed R1 and her room. LPA Vado made additional observations on this day regarding resident foods and observed the buildings and grounds including resident rooms and the room of R1. R1 was observed in her bed during these observations and did not want to get out of bed. Linens are in place during these observations. The restroom of R1 was observed but LPA did not detect any odors or see any unwashed resident items in the restroom. LPA observed lunch was and saw many fresh food items served to residents such as salad, salmon, brown rice, vegetables, and fruit. LPA also inspected facility food supplies and menu and observed all are in place. During observaCDSS inspection report, November 12, 2021 · control 14-AS-20210707130755

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 46 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
1
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
2
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
4
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
6
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
46
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(650) 654-9700
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Silverado Senior Living - Belmont Hills? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.