Araville Residential Care Home Ii is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in San Bruno, San Mateo County, California — state license #415600855, licensed for 6 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 5 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2023, the most recent dated July 1, 2025 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

28 homes in view

Araville Residential Care Home Ii

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Small home, 6 residents · San Bruno, CA · San Mateo County
LicensedWheelchairHospiceMemory care not on fileBedridden not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #415600855, held since 2012 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
1136 Vermont Avenue · San Bruno, San Mateo County
Phone
(650) 799-5722
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryVerified in record
Dementia / memory careNot on file — ask the home
Hospice careApproved for 2 residents
Bedridden careNot on file — ask the home

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. SIX MAY BE NON-AMBULATORY. SUBJECT TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE HOSPICE WAVIER FOR TWO RESIDENTS.State service designation985 - RCFE / HOSPICEthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2023, the state has visited this home 5 times and filed 5 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated July 1, 2025.

Most recent state visit
July 1, 2025
Occupancy at the March 17, 2025 visit
6 of 6 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 2 documents with transcribed findings, dated September 19, 2024 to March 17, 2025. 2 of the 2 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (1). 2 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 2 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 5 of 5 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20252 state visits · 2 documents
Jul 1, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 17, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Licensee did not provide a refund upon resident's death

On March 17, 2025 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Murial Han conducted an unannounced 10-day complaint investigation. LPA met with caregiver, Mila De Villa and explained the purpose of today's visit. Caregiver called and informed manager, Amie Flores of LPA's visit. Regarding to the allegation of- licensee did not provide a refund upon resident's death, the reporting party stated that resident-in-question (R1) passed away on 12/25/2024 and the responsible party has not gotten the refund. During today's visit, LPA interviewed the manager over the phone and she stated that the Licensee's son is handling the refund and he is planning to refund the money this month. LPA reminded the manager that per Title 22, the refund shall be issued within 15 days after the personal property is removed. After the investigation, this allegation is substantiated. Based on interview, during the investigation, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met. Therefore, this allegation was determined tothe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 17, 2025 · control 14-AS-20250311150516
20242 state visits · 2 documents
Sep 19, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff are not serving food in a safe and healthful manner. Facility staff are not ensuring that incontinent residents are kept clean and dry. Facility staff are withholding fluids to control incontinence. Facility staff are not properly trained resulting in injuries to the resident.

On September 19, 2024 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Murial Han conducted an unannounced visit to delivery the complaint investigation findings. LPA met with caregiver Mila De Villa and explained the purpose of today's visit. Regarding to the allegation of - facility staff are not serving food in a safe and healthful manner, the reporting party stated that the food is being served cold. As part of the investigation, LPA interviewed resident-in-question(R1), other residents and staff. According to R1 and the other residents, they were not being served cold food. They stated that the food is good and one of the residents stated that sometimes the food was served luke warm but it was never cold and staff would heat it up if they requested for it. According to staff, the food was not cold and if the residents wanted it warmer, they would heat it up. After the investigation, this allegation is deemed to be unsubstantiated. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 19, 2024 · control 14-AS-20240813105045
Jul 17, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20231 state visit · 1 document
Nov 18, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations0typical 0
Type B citations1typical 0
Substantiated complaints1typical 0
Total complaints2typical 0
State visits on file5typical 6
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 5,773 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2012.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202522120242202023110
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$8,000 /mo
our estimate — San Mateo County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,000 · statewide low$8,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
Ask how the 2025 complaint investigation report was corrected — what changed?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (650) 799-5722

Is Araville Residential Care Home Ii licensed?

Yes — Araville Residential Care Home Ii is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in San Bruno (San Mateo County): California license #415600855, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 6 residents. State records list 5 inspection and complaint documents since 2023; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated July 1, 2025, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Araville Residential Care Home Ii care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Araville Residential Care Home Ii with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory and hospice care; it does not list dementia / memory care and bedridden. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. SIX MAY BE NON-AMBULATORY. SUBJECT TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE HOSPICE WAVIER FOR TWO RESIDENTS.

How much does Araville Residential Care Home Ii cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Araville Residential Care Home Ii's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in San Mateo County typically runs $6,000–$9,000/mo and small board-and-care homes $5,000–$8,000/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Araville Residential Care Home Ii accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Araville Residential Care Home Ii is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

6 of 6 beds occupied (100%) when the state visited on March 17, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Araville Residential Care Home Ii?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 5 state visits and 5 dated documents since 2023 for Araville Residential Care Home Ii; 2 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated March 17, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Substantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

2 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLicensee did not provide a refund upon resident's death
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On March 17, 2025 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Murial Han conducted an unannounced 10-day complaint investigation. LPA met with caregiver, Mila De Villa and explained the purpose of today's visit. Caregiver called and informed manager, Amie Flores of LPA's visit. Regarding to the allegation of- licensee did not provide a refund upon resident's death, the reporting party stated that resident-in-question (R1) passed away on 12/25/2024 and the responsible party has not gotten the refund. During today's visit, LPA interviewed the manager over the phone and she stated that the Licensee's son is handling the refund and he is planning to refund the money this month. LPA reminded the manager that per Title 22, the refund shall be issued within 15 days after the personal property is removed. After the investigation, this allegation is substantiated. Based on interview, during the investigation, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met. Therefore, this allegation was determined toCDSS inspection report, March 17, 2025 · control 14-AS-20250311150516

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff are not serving food in a safe and healthful manner. Facility staff are not ensuring that incontinent residents are kept clean and dry. Facility staff are withholding fluids to control incontinence. Facility staff are not properly trained resulting in injuries to the resident.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On September 19, 2024 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Murial Han conducted an unannounced visit to delivery the complaint investigation findings. LPA met with caregiver Mila De Villa and explained the purpose of today's visit. Regarding to the allegation of - facility staff are not serving food in a safe and healthful manner, the reporting party stated that the food is being served cold. As part of the investigation, LPA interviewed resident-in-question(R1), other residents and staff. According to R1 and the other residents, they were not being served cold food. They stated that the food is good and one of the residents stated that sometimes the food was served luke warm but it was never cold and staff would heat it up if they requested for it. According to staff, the food was not cold and if the residents wanted it warmer, they would heat it up. After the investigation, this allegation is deemed to be unsubstantiated. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, September 19, 2024 · control 14-AS-20240813105045

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 5 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds), computed across all 5,773 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
0
typical for this size: 0
Type B citations
1
typical for this size: 0
Substantiated complaints
1
typical for this size: 0
Total complaints
2
typical for this size: 0
State visits on file
5
typical for this size: 6
See the full inspection record on the state's site →

Who runs Araville Residential Care Home Ii?

From the CDSS ownership record, checked August 9, 2026.

Licensed to Paniza, Dorie & Lamberto, who operates 2 licensed California homes in total. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.

Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(650) 799-5722
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Araville Residential Care Home Ii? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.