Skip to main content
CovelightCare
  • Start your search

    • MapExplore homes by area and what matters to you.
    • Directory
    • Guided search
    • Medi-Cal care homes

    Take a closer look

    • Check a home
    • Compare homes
    • Ask homes for me
  • Step by step

    • All care guidesEvery guide, in the order you’ll need them.
    • 1Step 1: Learn the kinds of care homes
    • 2Step 2: Ways to pay for care
    • 3Step 3: Find homes and check them
    • 4Step 4: Visit, and get the papers before you sign
    • 5Step 5: Move in
    • 6Step 6: The first months, and your rights

    Start with a question

    • Who pays for a care home?
    • Does Medi-Cal pay for a care home?
    • Board and care or assisted living?
    • Leaving the hospital soon?
    • Can a care home make someone leave?
    • Print a visit checklist
    • Check a home’s license
  • Professional tools

    • All professional tools
    • Discharge planning
    • Care management
    • Fiduciaries
    • Elder-law attorneys
    • Public-record worklist

    Care home operators

    • Manage your home’s profileYour home’s information and family inquiries.
    • Claim a home
    • Operator sign in
  • Get to know Covelight

    • How we work
    • Our data & sources
    • What’s new
    • Suggest a correction
    • Contact us
Saved homesGuided search
  • Start your search

    • MapExplore homes by area and what matters to you.
    • Directory
    • Guided search
    • Medi-Cal care homes

    Take a closer look

    • Check a home
    • Compare homes
    • Ask homes for me
  • Step by step

    • All care guidesEvery guide, in the order you’ll need them.
    • 1Step 1: Learn the kinds of care homes
    • 2Step 2: Ways to pay for care
    • 3Step 3: Find homes and check them
    • 4Step 4: Visit, and get the papers before you sign
    • 5Step 5: Move in
    • 6Step 6: The first months, and your rights

    Start with a question

    • Who pays for a care home?
    • Does Medi-Cal pay for a care home?
    • Board and care or assisted living?
    • Leaving the hospital soon?
    • Can a care home make someone leave?
    • Print a visit checklist
    • Check a home’s license
  • Professional tools

    • All professional tools
    • Discharge planning
    • Care management
    • Fiduciaries
    • Elder-law attorneys
    • Public-record worklist

    Care home operators

    • Manage your home’s profileYour home’s information and family inquiries.
    • Claim a home
    • Operator sign in
  • Get to know Covelight

    • How we work
    • Our data & sources
    • What’s new
    • Suggest a correction
    • Contact us
Guided search
Delta at the SherwoodsLicense #392700109 · Covelight Care
Covelight CareDelta at the SherwoodsLicense #392700109 · 1215 W Swain Road, Stockton, CA · (209) 689-3180Record printed from covelightcare.com — data as of the dates shown on each item.
Home/California/San Joaquin County/Stockton/Delta at the Sherwoods
The state lists this licence as on probation. Read the dated state documents.
Map · 1215 W Swain Road

© Protomaps © OpenStreetMap

Estimated starting rate$4,600/mo

Covelight estimate · likely $3,600–$6,050 · See costs

Check availability

Request a tour

More days
  • AskThe cost, or your own question
  • (209) 689-3180

    From the state licensing record · October 26, 2026

  • everwellhealth.org↗

Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.

DS

Call Delta at the Sherwoods

Stockton · Licensed for 42

(209) 689-3180

From the state licensing record · October 26, 2026

From the home’s website, everwellhealth.org:

(888) 356-1373 · admissions line · seen October 5, 2026

info@everwellhealth.org · general email · seen October 5, 2026

or

Let us do the legwork

  • We ask about availability, price and the care you describe.
  • If it’s a fit, you choose whether they call you. Either way, you get every answer.
Check availabilityFree

Mid-size home · Licensed for 42 · Stockton

Delta at the Sherwoods

1215 W Swain Road, Stockton, CA 95207 · On state probation

  • Overview
  • Care
  • Costs
  • Daily life
  • Location
  • State record

Delta at the Sherwoods

Overview

Estimated starting rate

$4,600 a month

Covelight estimate · likely $3,600–$6,050 See costs

No openings reported

  • Approved by the state: Wheelchair · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · October 26, 2026
  • Licensed for 42: a mid-size care homeThe state license record

Ask this home

Check availability

Request a tour

More days
  • AskThe cost, or your own question

Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.

Care and support

  • Wheelchairup to 37 residents
  • Hospiceup to 6 residents
  • Bedridden

Not on file: dementia approval.

Approved by the state · State licensing record · October 26, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 & OVER. CAPACITY OF FORTY-TWO (42) OF WHICH FIVE (5) MAY BE AMBULATORY & THIRTY-SEVEN (37) MAY BE NON-AMBULATORY. THREE (3) OF THE NON-AMBULATORY MAY BE BEDRIDDEN, IN NORTH CORRIDOR ONLY. DELAYED EGRESS APPROVED. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR SIX (6).

935 - ELDERLY

CDSS record, verbatim · October 26, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 6 — care may continue at the end of life

    State licensing record · October 26, 2026

We’ll ask for you. Not on file for Delta at the Sherwoods: two-person transfers or a lift, who is awake overnight, help with medicines and care if memory loss develops. When we check availability, we ask about these too.

Check availability

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$4,600a month to start

Likely $3,600–$6,050

From 9 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Monthly cost breakdownWith a shared room and basic help · room, care and fees$4,600likely a month
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room

Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.

  • Starting monthly rate$4,600likely $3,600–$6,050

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 9 homes with 7 to 49 beds and similar homes within 25 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (44 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,500one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,500 (133 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $3,600–$6,200
$4,600
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,400–$9,300
$7,100
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Rates at nearby homes9 nearby homes publish starting rates of $2,000 to $7,000

$2,000$7,000

EstimateLikely rangeA nearby home’s published starting rate

9 homes like this within 25 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,050–$6,600.

  • Chianti JoyStockton · 3.9 mi · Small home
    $3,500Listed on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026
  • Oasis Guest HomeStockton · 3.9 mi · Small home
    $5,000Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Briones Family HomecareStockton · 7.8 mi · Small home
    $3,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
  • Diamond CareFrench Camp · 8.7 mi · Mid-size home
    $6,500Listed on Seniorly · memory care private room · seen September 9, 2026. We don’t have this home’s dementia-care disclosure. California requires a home that advertises dementia care to describe that care in writing when you ask.
  • Belleview Assisted LivingBrentwood · 21 mi · Small home
    $7,000Listed on its own website · monthly · seen October 5, 2026
  • Buttons Elderly CareOakley · 22 mi · Small home
    $2,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living · seen September 9, 2026
  • Golden Star HomeRio Vista · 23 mi · Small home
    $5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living · seen September 9, 2026
  • Zannat Boarding CareAntioch · 25 mi · Small home
    $4,800Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Terrace View Assisted LivingAntioch · 25 mi · Small home
    $4,500Listed on its own website · memory care · seen October 5, 2026. We don’t have this home’s dementia-care disclosure. California requires a home that advertises dementia care to describe that care in writing when you ask.
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 9 homes with 7 to 49 beds and similar homes within 25 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time move-in fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

Ask for the price

An estimate for planning, not a quote. A home sets the price after hearing about the care needed.

Daily life

Daily life here is not on file yet, and that says nothing about the home.

The best way to see it is a visit.

Request a tour

Where it is

1215 W Swain Road, Stockton, CA 95207Address from the public record · October 26, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

  1. 1St. Joseph's Medical Center of StocktonHospital · General acute care, on the state’s list3 mi

Straight-line distances; check the drive or the walk. Hospital: the nearest general acute care hospital on the state’s list (CDPH, September 16, 2026).

Open directions ↗

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

CDSS public record, read October 26, 2026 · License #392700109 · See the state’s own record ↗

The last 36 months — 20 of 40 documents

Complaint outcomes in these 36 months, in the state’s words: 2 “Substantiated” and 7 “Unsubstantiated”.

20268 state visits · 8 documents

Sep 17, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not ensure facility is free of insects

On 9-17-2026 at 12:25pm, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Bilger arrived unannounced to open and investigate the allegation noted above. LPA met with staff1 (S1) and explained the purpose of the visit. Administrator Tammy Islam arrived at 1:00pm and met with LPA. LPA requested copies of pest control service for previous three months, housekeeping schedule for September 2026, staffing roster, resident roster, and conducted a facility observation. LPA also conducted interviews with three residents in care, and six staff members. Allegation: Staff do not ensure facility is free of insects. LPA conducted interviews, record reviews, and observation as noted above. Based on record reviews, it was revealed that facility has consistently maintained pest control services designed to ensure facility is free of infestation of insects. Housekeeping sechedule reviewed revealed indication of regular cleaning peformed by staff. Additionally, facility observation on 9-17-2026 did not reveal a presence of or evidence of insect infestation including bed bugs within facility. LPA did observe spider webs outside of facility containing trapped insects, which were later removed during LPA's visit by a staff member. {Cont. on 9099C} Unsubstantiated Interviews conducted did not reveal any corroborated statements or evidence to conclude insect infestation. As a result, there is not a preponderance of evidence to conclude facility experienced an insect infestation or fail to perform actions necessary to help ensure facility is free of insects, therefore, this allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding of unsubstantiated means the allegation may have happened or is valid, but there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator and a copy of this report was provided, and reviewed by vice president and chief operations officer Madison Fetyko. Appeal Rights and LIC 811 provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 17, 2026 · control 27-AS-20260914120552
Aug 6, 2026Facility evaluation reportCase Management - Legal/Non-complianceReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Legal/Non-compliance

On 8-6-2026 at 10:15am, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Bilger and Licensing Program Manager (LPM) Liza King arrived unannounced to conduct a quarterly inspection visit. LPA and LPM met with Interim Administrator Farina Khan and explained the purpose of the visit. During todays unannounced quarterly inspection the following were reviewed: A. Respondents shall operate the facilities in substantial compliance with the regulations and statutes governing the operations of adult residential facilities and residential care facilities for the elderly. B. During the period of probation, the Department, in its sole discretion, may conduct unannounced site visits for the purpose of determining whether there is compliance with the regulations and statutes governing the operation of adult residential facilities and residential care facilities for the elderly. C. Respondents, and each of them, shall ensure that all individuals working, residing or volunteering in the facility shall, to the extent required by law, obtain criminal record clearances or exemptions prior to their initial presence in the facility and shall maintain proof of such criminal record clearances or exemptions at the facility. VERIFIED by review of staff present today and guardian roster. Staffing schedules reviewed were dated 7/26/2026 to 8/1/2026 and 8/6/2026. D. This Stipulation shall be posted in a conspicuous place at the facility for the duration of the probationary period VERIFIED by observation E. Respondents are required to maintain accurate, complete and current client rosters which must be made available to the Department upon request. VERIFIED by record review F. Within thirty (30) days of the effective date of this Stipulation, Respondents shall submit to their respective licensing offices written summaries of their hiring and training practices, including job descriptions for each position at the facility. COMPLETED {Cont. on 809C} G. Respondents shall report to their respective Licensing offices the following: any unusual incident including, but not limited to, client death or injury which requires medical treatment, any allegations of or suspected physical or psychological abuse of any client, any physical plant changes and all unexplained absences, pursuant to applicable statutes and regulations. VERIFIED by record review. Additional documentation for resident1 (R1) and R2 via email to be provided by end of day. H. Respondents shall maintain current personnel records of each employee pursuant to California Code of Regulations, Title 22 Regulation sections 80066, 85066, and 87412 VERIFIED through review of ten staff files and interview with vice president and chief operations officer Madison Fetyko. Personnel training records were provided by Madison Fetyko. I. Respondents shall ensure that medications and any other toxic products are properly stored and kept in a safe and locked place that is not accessible to persons other than employees responsible for the supervision of the centrally stored medication pursuant to California Code of Regulations, Title 22 Regulation section 80075, 85075, and 87465, as applicable. Respondents will ensure that medications are properly and timely disposed of according to the applicable regulations VERIFIED by means of facility tour J. Respondents shall ensure that each facility is clean, safe, sanitary and in good repair at all times. VERIFIED by means of facility tour K. Respondents shall provide quarterly training to all facility staff on applicable Title 22 regulations including mental health assessments, client behaviors, observation of the clients/residents, medication protocols, the Department's inspection authority, personal rights, notice requirements, reporting requirements, transfer trauma and care and supervision, generally. Respondents shall keep a record of staff who attend such training and make such records available to Licensing staff upon request. VERIFIED by review of staff training from May 2026 to July 2026 which including training topics of care and supervision. During the past quarter, staff were provided training on care and supervision. L. Vice President and Chief Operations Officer is in process of securing additional information requested to confirm eligibility of prospective new administrator with documents to be sent to Regional Office by 8-7-2026. As a result of today's visit, no citation is issued. An exit interview was conducted with interim administrator and a copy of this report was provided. A copy of this report was further read and verified by vice president and chief operations officer.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 6, 2026
Jul 29, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not provide residents with clean and safe enviroments

On 7-29-2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Bilger arrived unannounced to open and investigate the allegations noted above. LPA met with Administrator Farina Khan and explained the purpose of the visit. During this investigation, LPA conducted observation of the facility including common areas, various residents rooms, kitchen and storage areas, laundry area and outside of the facility. Additionally, LPA conducted interviews with five staff members and three residents in care. Allegation: Staff do not provide residents with clean and safe environment. LPA conducted observation and interviews as noted above. Based on observation, it was revealed that facility is currently maintaining a clean and safe environment. LPA did not observe prominent stains on floors and walls. An observation of kitchen area did not reveal dirty food storage areas or expired, or soiled food. Additoinally, LPA observed laundry area to contain clean linens with laundry items separated appropriately. {Cont. on 9099C} Unsubstantiated Additionally, interviews conducted did not reveal any corroborated statements of facility not maintaining a clean and safe environment. As a result, the preponderance of evidence standard is not met, and this allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding of unsubstantiated means the allegation may have happened or is valid, but there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. An exit interview was conducted an a copy of this report was provided. A finding of unfouded means the allegation is false, could not have happened, and/or is without a reasonable basis. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator and a copy of this report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 29, 2026 · control 27-AS-20260720091048
Jul 17, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff has inappropriate interactions with resident

On 7-17-2026 at 2:00pm, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Bilger arrived unannounced to deliver and discuss findings for the allegation noted above. LPA met with acting administrator Farina Khan and explained the purpose of the visit. During this investigation, LPA conducted interviews with five staff members and four residents. Additionally, LPA reviewed facility file documentation including needs and services plan and physician’s report pertaining to resident1 (R1), as well as staff file record for staff1 (S1). Allegation: Staff has inappropriate interactions with resident. LPA conducted interviews and record reviews as noted above. Based on the evidence reviewed, it was revealed that R1 previously resided at facility while S1 was employed as the Administrator, and S1 had regular contact with R1 as part of S1's regular job related duties. It was further revealed that after R1 transferred to another facility, R1 continued to receive visits by S1 who was aware of and consented to the visit. {Cont. on 9099C} Unsubstantiated Interviews also revealed that no corroborated evidence existed to suggest that actions describing inappropriate interaction between S1 and R1 occurred while residing at Delta at the Sherwoods. A review of staffing file did not indicate previous disciplinary action or history of inappropriate interactions with residents. As part of this investigation, a review of R1’s needs and service plan and physician’s report revealed a history of paranoia and hallucinations. As a result of the above evidence reviewed, it is determined that there is not a preponderance of evidence to conclude that staff engaged in inappropriate interactions with a resident, therefore, this allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding of unsubstantiated means the allegation may have happened or is valid, but there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. An exit interview was conducted with acting administrator and a copy of this report was provided. Appeal rights provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 17, 2026 · control 27-AS-20260424151028
Jul 8, 2026Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 7-8-2026 at 9:55am, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Michael Bilger and Albert Johnson arrived at this facility unannounced to conduct an annual inspection visit. LPA met with the assistant administrator Farina Khan and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA inspected the physical plant including but not limited to the kitchen, dining room, resident bedrooms; resident bathrooms, laundry room, living area, common TV area, and outside of the facility to ensure compliance with Title 22 regulations. Facility is a residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE) with a current census of 27. Facility has a formal dining room. LPA also conducted the inspection using the CARE tool. The facility has an approved infection control plan in place. Water temperature reads 105*F to 120*F in the bathroom and room temperature reads 68*F. LPA observed the facility to have adequate food supply. Resident rooms were sanitary and had the required furniture and furnishings. The facility common areas were clean and furnished. Smoke and carbon detectors were in good repair. Fire extinguisher was checked 8-28-25. Facility has an emergency food and water kit. All toxins and other dangerous items including sharp objects were locked and inaccessible to residents in care. Medication storage area was observed to be locked and inaccessible to residents in care. First aid kit was observed to have adequate supplies and accessible to staff. {Cont. on 809C} During this inspection 3 resident files and 5 staffing files were reviewed for regulatory compliance. All files contained required contents including staff training requirements. All staff reviewed contained criminal background clearances. LPA completed 3 resident interviews and 3 staff interviews. Resident files reviewed contained all required contents including updated admission agreements, medical assessments, and updated appraisal forms as required. Facility does not contain any bodies of water. LPA observed personal rights and complaint information posted. Facility has appropriate internet access available for resident use. LPA observed facility’s activity calendar and sufficient equipment and supplies to meet activity program needs of residents in care. LPA reviewed facility’s disaster plan to ensure regulatory compliance. Facility conducts monthly fire drills. LPA requested an updated copy of LIC 308 and LIC 500. Per California Code of Regulations, Title 22, no deficiencies were observed during this visit. Exit interview was held and a report was given to assistant Administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 8, 2026
Apr 30, 2026Facility evaluation reportCase Management - Legal/Non-complianceReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Legal/Non-compliance

On 4-30-2026 at 10:15am, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Bilger arrived at this facility unannounced to conduct a quarterly inspection visit. LPA met with the interim administrator Farina Khan9df8dak and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA inspected the physical plant including but not limited to the kitchen area, common areas, resident bedrooms; resident bathrooms, laundry area and outside of the facility to ensure compliance with Title 22 regulations. Facility is a residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE) with a current census of 30 The facility has an approved infection control plan in place. LPA observed the facility to have adequate food supply. Resident rooms were sanitary and had the required furniture and furnishings. The facility common areas were clean and furnished. Fire extinguisher was checked 8-28-25. Facility has an emergency food and water kit. All toxins and other dangerous items including sharp objects were locked and inaccessible to residents in care. Medication storage area was observed to be locked and inaccessible to residents in care. {Cont. on 809C} During this inspection 15 staffing files were reviewed for training verification. LPA verified all staff training is current at this time per stipulation order. LPA reviewed current client rosters, and observed current stipulation posted within facility for viewing. All staff files reviewed contained criminal background clearances. LPA observed personal rights and complaint information posted. Facility has appropriate internet access available for resident use. LPA reviewed facility’s disaster plan to ensure regulatory compliance. LPA requested an updated copy of LIC 308 and LIC 500. At this time facility is in transition of hiring a new administrator. LPA spoke with regional manager during today's visit who stated she will be sending necessary information for processing of a new administrator. Previous administrator left employment as of 4-20-2026. During today's visit, LPA reviewed various incident reports involving medication refusals and absence without leaves (AWOLs). LPA reviewed facility's protocol on AWOL procedures and medication procedures. LPA also conducted various staff and resident interviews during today's visit. In regards to a recent reported AWOL attempt, resident3 (R3) was reported to have followed his aunt to a local restaurant after departing facility and from this location departed further. Staff followed resident and called 911 to have resident transported to hospital due to complaints of chest pain. R3 has since returned without further incident. Per California Code of Regulations, Title 22, no deficiencies were observed during this visit. Exit interview was held and a report was given to interim Administrator. LIC 811 provided for reference.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 30, 2026
Apr 23, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not assist resident with obtaining medical care in a timely manner

On 10/20/25, the Department received a complaint alleging that staff did not respond to Resident 1’s calls for help, that staff were not present on the floor during night or early morning hours, and that R1 experienced delayed medical attention following a reported fall. The complaint also alleged that R1 had experienced similar incidents in the past where staff did not hear or respond to his calls for assistance. LPA conducted an unannounced visit to the facility, interviewed the Administrator, staff, and residents, including R1 and Resident 2 . LPA also reviewed staff schedules, nightshift supervision procedures, incident reports, and hospital discharge documentation. Continued Unsubstantiated Although R1 and R2 reported concerns regarding staff response time, there were no witnesses, no time‑stamped documentation, and no corroborating evidence to confirm that R1 called for help for an extended period without staff response. Staff interviews and facility records indicate staff were present and responded once notified. The allegation that staff failed to supervise residents at night or delayed medical care could not be verified. Based on interviews, record review, and observations, the allegation is determined to be UNSUBSTANTIATED, Although the allegation may have occurred or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 23, 2026 · control 27-AS-20251104150620
Feb 6, 2026Facility evaluation reportOfficeReport on file

Type of visit: Office

An in-person office meeting was held on 02/06/2026 at 11:00 AM at the Sacramento Regional Office for the purpose of reviewing the Stipulation and Waiver, and Order. The Stipulation and Waiver; and Order was adopted on 01/09/2026. Licensing Staff Present: · Regional Managers: Brenda White, Stephenie Doub, Acting Regional Manager Troy Ordonez · Licensing Program Manager: Liza King · Licensing Program Analysts: Albert Johnson, Melinda Melina, Michael Bilger and Kevin Mcknelly Facility/Licensee Representatives Present: · Chief Executive Officer, Managing Member, LLC, Dr. Christopher Zubiate and David Fetyko · H & K LLP, Attorney for LLC, Bruce Zabarauskas · COO, Madison Fetyko, Personal Assistant, Heidi Badasci The Regional Manager discussed the purpose of the meeting and explained the conditions and terms of the Stipulation and Waiver with Order, including probationary licensing, compliance expectations, monitoring authority, and enforcement provisions. The Stipulation was reviewed in detail with the Administrator and Licensee, who acknowledged understanding of the terms and conditions. EVER WELL HEALTH SYSTEMS, LLC, EVER WELL CARE SYSTEMS, LLC, Ever Well Health Systems, LLC dba Enclave at the Foothills 10650 Road 256 Terra Bella, California 93270 Ever Well Health Systems, LLC; Ever Well Care Systems, LLC dba Delta at Holly Oaks 1880 Live Oak.Blvd. Yuba City, California 95991 Ever Well Health Systems, LLC dba Delta at the Portside 1950 E. Sonora Street Stockton, California 95250 Ever Well Health Systems, LLC dba Enclave at the Delta 4951 Eight Mile Road Stockton, California 95212 Ever Well Health Systems, LLC dba Delta Manor 1201 W. Swain Rd. Stockton, California 95207 Ever Well Health Systems, LLC dba Delta at the Sherwoods 1215 W. Swain Road Stockton California 95207 Ever Well Health Systems, LLC dba Foothills at the Alta 550 N. Lillie Ave. Dinuba, California 93618 Items Discussed During the Meeting: · The Stipulation and Waiver; and Order was served on 01/09/2026 and is effective immediately. Ever Well Health Systems, LLC dba Foothills at the Alta license was forfeited as a matter of law and revoked upon the Departments adoption of this Stipulation and Waiver. · Revocations: Stayed with Probation from January 9, 2026, through January 9, 2028. · Upon adoption of the Stipulation as an Order, EVER WELL HEALTH SYSTEMS, LLC, EVER WELL CARE SYSTEMS, LLC LLC’s licenses at Licensee facilities are revoked; however, the revocation is stayed for a period of two (2) years, during which probationary licenses are granted. · During the probationary period, Respondents shall operate the facility in substantial compliance with all applicable statutes and regulations governing Adult Residential Facilities and Residential Care Facilities for the Elderly. · The Department may conduct unannounced site visits at its sole discretion throughout the probationary period to assess compliance. · Respondents shall ensure that all individuals working, residing, or volunteering at the facility obtain required criminal record clearances or exemptions prior to presence in the facility and that proof is maintained on-site. · The Stipulation shall be posted in a conspicuous location at the facility for the full duration of probation. · Respondents shall maintain accurate, complete, and current client rosters, which must be made available to the Department upon request. · Within thirty (30) days of the effective date of the Stipulation, Respondents shall submit written summaries of hiring and training practices, including job descriptions for each position, to the appropriate licensing offices. Completion of Probation: · If Respondents LLC successfully comply with all terms of the Stipulation, at the conclusion of the two (2) year probationary period, all imposed conditions shall expire and the licenses shall be granted or restored in full. The Licensees/Respondents/Representatives stated they would abide by the following: Abide by the contents/terms of the Stipulation Provide Licensing an updated Plan of Operation for the type of client serve Submit written summaries of hiring and training practices, including job descriptions for each Position to the Department on or before February 8, 2026 CHRISTOPHER ZUBIATE and DAVID FETYKO shall complete required training's on or before March 10, 2026 and provide proof of completed training to the Department by on or before April 9, 2026. Ensure quarterly training of Staff according to the terms of the stipulation (The first is to be completed by end of February of 2026 and quarterly thereafter for a total of two hours for each session.) CCLD will do the following: Increase monitoring Referral to TSP was offered Per the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, no violations cited during this visit. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 6, 2026

20255 state visits · 6 documents

Sep 8, 2025Facility evaluation reportCase Management - IncidentReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Incident

Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Albert Johnson and Jason Lund arrived unannounced to conduct a case management visit. LPAs met with Joshua Riviera and explained the purpose of the visit. The RO referred this case to the Investigations Branch (IB), to investigate the allegation that staff failed to seek timely medical care for R1 which resulted in R1's death. Finding: Unsubstantiated R1 was experiencing vomiting multiple times on 6/1/2025. Medication Services Assistant (MSA) reported R1 was vomiting at approximately 1600 hours. MSA monitored R1 and when her symptoms did not improve, R1 was sent to the hospital at approximately 1900 hours. R1 had a history of constipation and had a small bowel obstruction procedure in 2018. While in the hospital, a scan of the abdomen and pelvis revealed a large amount of stool in the colon, suggesting constipation and a probable mid small bowel obstruction. R1 reported her pain resolved after receiving an enema and passing a large solid bowel movement on 6/2/2025. Administrator Joshua Rivera stated he received confirmation from the hospital on 6/2/2025 that R1 was scheduled to return to the facility on 6/3/2025. However, R1 passed away at St. Joseph’s Medical Center on 6/2/2025 at 2335 hours. R1’s death certificate lists cause of death as small bowel obstruction with onset to “hours” and fecal impaction with onset to “hours.” Medication records obtained from the facility documented R1 was prescribed multiple medications to treat constipation. According to the records, R1 took her medications as prescribed in the days leading up to her hospitalization and death.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 8, 2025
Jul 7, 2025Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 7/7/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Albert Johnson arrived unannounced to conduct an annual inspection. LPA met with and explained the purpose of the visit. The facility physical plant was inspected the including but not limited to the kitchen, dining room, resident bedrooms; resident bathrooms, laundry room, activity room, and outside courtyards. LPA observed sufficient furniture and lighting throughout the facility. LPA observed sufficient seven day non-perishable and two day perishable food supplies. Advisories given for three bags of spoiled Kale (leave were yellow and liquid was forming in the bags), ECO lab reports missing and cloth towels in all residents bathrooms and the paper towel dispensers were not working in 8 of 8 rooms inspected. Hot water temperature was measured at 107.0 degrees Fahrenheit in resident bathroom sink, which is within the required range of 105 to 120 degrees. Fire extinguishers and smoke detectors are current and in compliance with fire safety. LPA observed centrally stored medications locked in each section of the facility. LPA reviewed and compared resident medication vs. resident medication logs. LPA attempted to reviewed 10 resident and 5 staff files, including criminal record clearances. Advisories given for incomplete information on staff applications (I-9 form blank and criminal record statements missing explanation for marking yes on the question). Fire drill was completed on 5/28/2025. First aid kit was checked and is complete. No deficiencies were cited. Advisories given. Exit interview conductedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 7, 2025
Jun 16, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff will not accept resident back after hospital discharge

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Albert Johnson and Ellen Lindstrom conducted an unannounced facility visit to delivery findings. LPA met with Staff and explained the purpose of today's visit. Later joined by Dr. Zubiate. Based on the information received by the department. R1 was discharged from the facility and referred to another facility for ongoing psychiatric evaluation, medication adherence and stabilization. The hospital discharged R1 to a skilled nursing facility. The Delta Sherwood was unable to excepted R1 back due to the discharge plan written for R1 to be sent to a skilled nursing facility. Although the allegation may have occurred as reported there was insufficient evidence to prove the allegation. The preponderance of evidence standard was not met therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report with appeal rights was given to Licensee. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 16, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250311135925
Jun 16, 2025Facility evaluation reportCase Management - OtherReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

LPA's Albert Johnson and Ellen Lindstrom arrived unannounced and met with the Licensee who assisted LPA with the visit. LPA's toured the facility, During the tour LPA's witnessed R2's eyes with heavy discharge. The facility has been attempting to send R2 out for treatment and was able to contact the home health agency for antibiotics. R2 had home health services for follow-up for unsteady gait and was discharged by home health on 6/13/2025. The home health agency was not treating R2's eyes. R2's eyes require additional treatment after the discharge from the home health agency. The facility sent R2's out this morning for additional observation and treatment. Exit interview and appeal rights given.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 16, 2025
Apr 30, 2025Facility evaluation reportCase Management - Legal/Non-complianceReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Legal/Non-compliance

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Johnson and Program Manager Lisa Rios arrived at facility unannounced to conduct a visit to ensure compliance with Health and Safety Code (HSC) 1569.38 - Posting of Licensing Reports. LPA Johnson and LPM Rios met with Administrator and explained the purpose of today's visit. The facility received accusation notifying the department has commenced proceedings to suspend or revoke the license of the facility pursuant to Section HSC 1569.50. and the facility will be required to post these in a location easily viewable by residents and visitors. A written notice was handed to Administrator of these accusations. The facility will comply with HSC 1569.38(a-h). A licensee who fails to comply with the requirements of subdivision (b) or (c) of the HSC 1569.38 shall be liable for civil penalties in the amount of one hundred dollars ($100) for each day of the failure to provide notification as required in this section. The total civil penalty for each day shall not exceed one hundred dollars ($100) regardless of the number of notices that the licensee fails to send that day. The total civil penalty for a continuous violation of subdivision (b) or (c) shall not exceed five thousand dollars ($5,000). An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 30, 2025
Mar 13, 2025Facility evaluation reportCase Management - DeficienciesDeficiency page: Type A

Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies

Licensing Program Analyst Albert Johnson conducted an unannounced Case Management visit today. LPA explained purpose of visit to staff. LPA conducted a tour through facility with staff to check fire clearance. LPA observed the Ansul system had not be serviced since May 14 2024. There is a semi-annual inspection that is required. The system has not been serviced. Photo taken. Also observed in the conference room was a plug burned out and not operational. Deficiencies were observed and cited from the California Code of Regulations, Title 22. Civil penalties assessed.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 13, 2025

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87203 · Plan of correction due date: Mar 14, 2025

All facilities shall be maintained in conformity with the regulations adopted by the State Fire Marshal for the protection of life and property against fire and panic. This requirement is not met based on: Observation.The facility failed to maintained in conformity with the regulations adopted by the State Fire Marshal. The "Fixed System" or "Ansul System", this system is scheduled for a semi- annual maintenance and was last serviced on 05/14/2024.This poses an immediate Health and Safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 13, 2025

Plan of correction: Administrator will ensure that the fire equipment listed is inspected or a plan is made and sent to CCL by the POC date indicated. Licensee/Administrator shall send picture of the new tags as proof and submit Statement of Compliance by POC date.

20245 state visits · 6 documents

Jul 8, 2024Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 7/8/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Albert Johnson arrived unannounced to conduct an annual inspection. LPA met with Essence and explained the purpose of the visit. Later joined by Chris Zubiate. The facility physical plant was inspected the including but not limited to the kitchen, dining room, resident bedrooms; resident bathrooms, laundry room, activity room, and outside courtyards. LPA observed sufficient furniture and lighting throughout the facility. LPA observed sufficient seven day non-perishable and two day perishable food supplies. Hot water temperature was measured at 118.0 degrees Fahrenheit in resident bathroom sink, which is not within the required range of 105 to 120 degrees. Fire extinguishers and smoke detectors are current and in compliance with fire safety. LPA observed centrally stored medications locked in each section of the facility. LPA reviewed and compared resident medication vs. resident medication logs. LPA attempted to reviewed 7 resident and 5 staff files, including criminal record clearances. Fire drill was completed on 6/2024 . First aid kit was checked and is complete. No deficiencies were cited. Exit interview conductedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 8, 2024
Mar 19, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff will not allow resident to have a bike

On 3/19/2024, LPA Johnson arrived unannounced to deliver finding for the above listed allegations. Allegation: Staff will not allow resident to have a bike. Based on review of the admissions agreement and program design the facility is following the plan to ensure that the residents in care are safe, free from harm, danger and potential accusations. R1's physician's report does not restrict him from having a bike, however, the bike in question was given to R1 by someone in the community. The origin of how the bike was given to R1 is the question that the facility is attempting to figure out. Continued Substantiated The program states that R1 has a history of taking items that is not his and attempting to sell these items. The facility has not had a police visit or inquiry as it relates to the bike and how R1 may have obtained the bike. Although the facility in good faith is attempting to prevent R1 from the ill effects of what may be. There is no doctor's objection to R1 having a bike, no rule established by the facility or regulation to support R1 not having a bike. The allegation is substantiated. Per California Code of Regulations (CCRs) - Title 22, Div.6, Ch. 8, a deficiency is being cited on the attached 9099D during this visit. If any deficiencies are not corrected by the noted due dates; civil penalties may be assessed. A copy of their rights was provided (LIC9058) and their signature on this form acknowledges receipt of these rights. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 19, 2024 · control 27-AS-20240112115446

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87468.2(a)(3) · Plan of correction due date: Mar 29, 2024

87468.2 (a) In addition to the rights listed in Section 87468.1, Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities, residents in privately operated residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following personal rights: . (3) To be encouraged and assisted in exercising their rights as citizens and as residents of the facility. Residents shall be free from interference, coercion, discrimination, and retaliation in exercising their rights. This requirement is not met as evidenced by records reviewed and interviews conducted. The bike is not at the facility and is not list on R1 personal property inventory sheet. This is a personal right violationthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 19, 2024

Plan of correction: The facility will review the policy for personal property and include what may or may not be stored at the facility including modes of transportation etc. The addendum to the program plan will be provided to the department by close of business on POC date 3/29/24.

Mar 7, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff are not assisting residents with hygiene needs after digging through the trash

On 03/07/2024 at 09:00 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Renee Campbell and Licensing Program Manager (LPM) Lisa Rios conducted an unannounced facility visit to open a complaint investigation. Upon entry, LPA Campbell and LPM Rios met with S1 and S2 and explained the purpose of today's visit. LPA and LPM toured the facility with S2 and met with S3 while on tour of the kitchen. Administrator Tanya Monge arrived at 10 am and arranged interviews with R1, R2, R6 and R7. Over the course of the investigation based on interviews with 4 residents, it was disclosed that 2 to 3 residents dig through the trash at meal time and start eating the food. Staff discourage residents from eating from the trash but 4 out of 4 residents state that they are not reminded to wash their hands after digging in the trash. Based on interviews, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegations are found to be SUBSTANTIATED. Substantiated Per California Code of Regulations (CCRs) - Title 22, Div.6, Ch. 8, a deficiency is being cited on the attached 9099D during this visit. If any deficiencies are not corrected by the noted due dates; civil penalties may be assessed. A copy of their rights was provided (LIC9058) and their signature on this form acknowledges receipt of these rights. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 7, 2024 · control 27-AS-20240228151709

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87101(c)(3)A) · Plan of correction due date: Mar 15, 2024

87101(c)(3)(A) Definition "Care and Supervision" means those activities which if provided shall require the facility to be licensed.(A) Assistance in dressing, grooming, bathing and other personal hygiene; This requirement is not met: Based on 4 out of 4 interviews, staff are not reminding nor assisting residents with hand washing after residents are digging through the trash at meal time. This poses a potential Health, Safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 7, 2024

Plan of correction: Administrator will meet with staff to remind them to ensure client’s to ask for more food if they are still hungry and to urge client's to wash their hands when digging in the class. A sign in sheet will be emailed to LPA Campbell at renee.campbell@dss.ca.gov to verify the meeting..

Mar 7, 2024Facility evaluation reportCase Management - OtherReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

On 03/07/24, Licensing Program Analyst Renee Campbell and Licensing Program Manager Lisa Rios arrived unannounced to the facility to open a new complaint. As we toured the facility LPM Rios observed that there was a tray of prepared sandwiches on top of the counter. Per S3, the cook had just finished making sandwiches before leaving the facility and left them on the counter. At the request by LPM Rios, staff immediately put the sandwiches in the refrigerator. An advisory was then given to remind the cook to immediately place food in the fridge after prepping. No deficiencies were given. Exit interview.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 7, 2024
Jan 30, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff threatened to restrict resident from leaving the facility premises

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Albert Johnson arrived at facility on 1/30/2024 unannounced to deliver findings for the complaint allegation listed above. LPA Johnson met with Tanya Monge and explained the purpose of today's visit. Based on records reviewed it was confirmed that the facilities' admissions agreement has specific information for resident's disciplinary actions for various infractions. The facility provides the residents with alternatives to outings while the residents are serving their consequence from a Targeted Behavior Agreement Contract (TBAC) meeting. Continued Unsubstantiated The TBAC meetings are staffed by behavioral support teams, Administrator and the county if they choose to participate. R1 agreed and signed the TBAC and was placed on the restriction based on violation of the facilities policy as it relates to bullying (staff and residents), fighting and threatening harm. The allegation is unsubstantiated. A finding of UNSUBSTANTIATED means that although the violations may have occurred as reported the preponderance of evidence standard was not met. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report with appeal rights given.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 30, 2024 · control 27-AS-20231017140117
Jan 26, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff is not providing resident access to their money. Staff withhold food from residents. The facility has mold.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Albert Johnson arrived at facility on 1/26/2024 unannounced to deliver findings for the complaint allegations in to the above list. LPA Johnson met with Tanya Monge and explained the purpose of today's visit. Allegation: Staff is not providing resident access to their money. Based on records reviewed it was confirmed that the facility uses a payee service for the Residents in care. The information is outlined in the admissions agreement with specific instructions for disbursements of funds, deposit of funds and how the residents will receive personal and incidentals funds. The facility uses form LIC 405(Record Of Client's/Resident's Safeguarded Cash Resources) for tracking of funds that have been sent over by the facilities corporate head quarters. The allegation is unsubstantiated. Unsubstantiated Allegation: Staff withhold food from residents. Based on interviews with the residents and observation on 10/12/2023, 10/25/2023, and 11/27/2023 the facility provides three meals and snack at specific times through out the day. The residents interviewed denied having food taken away by staff, however they did mention that there is a resident that will take food from them and the staff will have to intervene and redirect the resident and return or replace the food that was taken. The allegation is unsubstantiated. Allegation: Facility has mold. Based on observation, records reviewed and interviews with outside agencies the facility appears not to have/had a problem with mold in or around the facility. The facility provided the department with work orders and receipts for the repair work completed at the facility in the residents shower. LPA observed the work in progress and being completed on 10/12/2023, 10/25/2023, 11/27/2023 and again on 1/26/2024. The facility denies that the presence of mold was present at the time of the first repair and continues to deny that there was mold at anytime. The allegation is unsubstantiated. A finding of UNSUBSTANTIATED means that although the violations may have occurred as reported the preponderance of evidence standard was not met. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report with appeal rights given.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 26, 2024 · control 27-AS-20231011123255

The state marks this report as 4 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 2. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

Earlier years2021 to 2023 · 20 documents

20234 state visits · 4 documents

Sep 19, 2023Facility evaluation reportPOCReport on file

Type of visit: POC

On 9/19/23 at approximately 9:30am Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Maja Jensen and Kesha Lewis arrived at facility unannounced to conduct a Plan of Correction (POC) visit. LPAs Jensen and Lewis met with site manager Craig Vincelet and explained the purpose of today's visit. On 9/6/23 LPA Jensen issued a citation in relation to reporting requirements with a POC as follows: The Licensee agrees to send a signed attestation to maja.jensen@dss.ca.gov that the regulation has been read, understood and will be complied with by POC due date. The POC due date was listed as 9/13/23 and to date has not been received. Civil penalties are being assessed for failure to correct deficiencies. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report and appeal rights were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 19, 2023
Sep 6, 2023Facility evaluation reportCase Management - DeficienciesDeficiency page: Type B

Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies

On 9/6/23 at approximately 2:20pm Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Maja Jensen arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a case management related to an incident that was reported by telephone. LPA Maja Jensen met with site supervisor Craig Vincelet and explained the purpose of today's visit. On 8/28/23 at approximately 4:52pm Craig Vincelet called LPA Jensen and made a verbal report regarding the unauthorized absence of Resident 1 (R1). On 9/6/23, prior to commencing this visit LPA Jensen reviewed all incident reports received for August 2023 and September 2023 and confirmed that no written report was received by the Department for this incident. LPA Jensen interviewed site manager Craig Vincelet who also confirmed that a written report was not sent prior to this visit. LPA Jensen interviewed site manager who stated R1 signed out indicating he is going to teh store, R1 did not return after 24 hours and then facility protocol was followed wherein a missing persons report was filed with law enforcement. After filing the missing persons report, site manager located R1 walking on a city street and brought R1 back to the facility on 8/31/23. LPA Jensen reviewed the sign out log and confirmed that R1 signed out on 8/25/23 at 3:20pm. The site manager confirmed that an incident report will be submitted to the Department for review on this date. The Department, after reviewing the report, may return to address any deficiencies found. Deficiencies are being cited from the California Code of Regulations (CCR). Failure to correct may result in the assessment of civil penalties. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was given.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 6, 2023

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87211(a)(1)(D) · Plan of correction due date: Sep 13, 2023

Reporting Requirements A written report shall be submitted to the licensing agency and to the person responsible for the resident within seven days of the occurrence of any of the events specified in (A) through (D) below...Any incident which threatens the welfare, safety or health of any resident, such as psychological abuse of a resident by staff or other residents, or unexplained absence of any resident. Based on LPA Jensen's verification through interview with site manager Craig Vincelet and Department record review a written report was not received for an unauthorized resident absence within the required time frame. This poses a potential risk to the health, safety and personal rights of residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 6, 2023

Plan of correction: The Licensee agrees to send a signed attestation to maja.jensen@dss.ca.gov that the regulation has been read, understood and will be complied with by POC due date.

Jun 27, 2023Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ruth Wallace conducted unannounced required one year annual visit. LPA met with administrator and explained the purpose of today's visit. The facility is a single story building with signage including but not limited to See Something Say Something, Fire clearance, disaster plan, employee rights and resident rights was observed to be posted in prominent areas and visible to staff and residents. LPA and administrator toured the facility including but not limited to common areas, dining hall, kitchen, pantry, administrative offices, resident rooms, and grounds. The kitchen was observed to not be clean and sanitary on the floor behind dishwasher. A seven day supply of non-perishable food and 2 day supply perishable food was observed. A weekly menu was posted in a prominent area visible by residents. The fire alarm and carbon monoxide detector was checked and observed to be in good working order. The fire extinguishers were last serviced on 9/24/2022 and are in compliance. Adequate lighting was observed throughout the facility. The facility temperature was set at 73 degrees which halls within the required range of 68-85 degrees. The facility operates with delayed egress door system. The resident rooms are divided in to men's and women's halls. Water temperature in common area bathrooms measured at 109.4F degrees which falls within the required range of 105 to 120 degrees. The facility maintains medication in a locked storage room that is inaccessible to residents. Toxins, disinfectants and sharp objects were observed to be stored in locked areas and are inaccessible to residents. The grounds were observed to be clean and in free of obstruction. Continued on 809-C Page 2 Continued from 809 - Page 2 LPA reviewed 4 staff record files and the facility has sufficient staffing to provide the services needed to meet the residents’ needs. All staff have criminal record clearance and are associated to the facility. LPA reviewed 5 resident files which had all required documents. LPA received the following updated documents for Community Care Licensing: LIC 308 Designation of Administrative Responsibility, Administrator’s Certificate and Liability Insurance Deficiency was cleared during LPA visit and area behind dishwasher was cleaned. Per California Code of Regulations (CCR's) - Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8, a deficiency is being cited on the attached 809-D during this visit. Exit interview held with administrator. A copy of reports and appeal rights were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 27, 2023
Feb 3, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff did not return funds to resident's that have left the facility

On 2/3/23 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) arrived at facility unannounced to deliver complaint findings. LPA Jensen met with site manager Craig Vincelet and explained the purpose of today's visit. An investigation was conducted by the Department. The Department reviewed LIC 405's and conducted interviews with case workers, family members and payee services staff related to residents that left the facility between June and August of 2022. There was no evidence found to support the allegation of staff did not return funds to resident's after they left the facility. The allegation is UNFOUNDED. A finding of unfounded means that the allegation is false, could not have happened, or is without a reasonable basis. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was given to site manager Craig Vincelet. Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 3, 2023 · control 27-AS-20220818161838

The state marks this report as 3 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 1. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

20227 state visits · 9 documents

Nov 18, 2022Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff pushed resident to the ground to clean up a spill

On 11/18/22 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Maja Jensen arrived at facility to contiue a complaint investigation in to the above listed allegation. LPA Jensen met with site manager Craig Vincelet and explained the purpose of today's visit. During the course of the investigation LPA Jensen interviewed a current staff member, a former staff member, former resident 1 (R1), R1's conservator and R1's family member. LPA Jensen also reviewed all records in R1's resident file. LPA Jensen was unable to corroborate the statements made claiming that this incident was witnessed. LPA Jensen was also unable to find documentation to serve as supporting evidence that this incident occured therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding of unsubstantiated means that although the allegation may have happened, the preponderance of evidence does not prove it. No citations are being issued as a result of this investigation. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report and appeal rights were given to Craig Vincelet. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 18, 2022 · control 27-AS-20220929075450
Sep 29, 2022Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are not adequately trained

On 9/29/22 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Maja Jensen arrived at facility unannouced to deliver findings for a complaint investigation related to the above listed allegation. LPA Jensen met with Craig Vincelet and explained the purpose of today's visit. During the course of the investigation LPA Jensen reviewed training records for 3 staff members that served in 3 different roles. All staff for which records were reviewed were determined to have adequate training. The allegation is found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding of unsubstantiated means that while the allegation may be true, the preponderance of evidence standard has not been met. No deficiencies are being cited. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report along with appeal rights were given. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 29, 2022 · control 27-AS-20220818161838

The state marks this report as 3 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 1. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

Sep 29, 2022Facility evaluation reportCase Management - DeficienciesDeficiency page: Type B

Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies

On 9/29/22 at approximately 10am Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Maja Jensen arrived at facility unannounced to conduct a case management for deficiencies relating to an expired Administrator's certificate. LPA Jensen met with assistant Administrator Craig Vincelet and explained the purpose of today's visit. The Administrator for the facility is currently listed as Leah Zubiate. The Administrator's Certificate for Leah Zubiate has expired. The Community Care Licensing Division Administrator Certification Section confirmed that a Administrator's Certificate renewal request was sent by Leah Zubiate on 3/21/21. On 5/17/21 the Community Care Licensing Division Administrator Certification Section sent notification to Leah Zubiate of incomplete documentation for the renewal. The application was withdrawn due to a lack of response. On 7/12/22 LPA Jensen sent Administrator Leah Zubiate the phone number and email for the Department's Administrator Certification division so she could address the expired certification. The Community Care Licensing Department has not received any notification of a change in Administrators to date. Deficiencies are being cited from the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report and appeal rights were given.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 29, 2022

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87505(a) · Plan of correction due date: Sep 30, 2022

87405 Administrator - Qualifications and Duties (a) All facilities shall have a qualified and currently certified administrator... This requirement was not as evidenced by: Based on LPA Jesen's verification with Community Care Licensing Division Administrator Certification Section, Administrator Leah Zubiate does not hold a current Administrator's Certificate. This poses a potential health, safety and personal rights risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 29, 2022

Plan of correction: The Licensee agrees to appoint a new Administrator of record to the facility. An email was sent to LPA Jensen during the course of the visit notifying the Department of the intent to appoint a new Administrator. LPA Jensen requested a letter from the licensee appointing the individual as the Administrator, an LIC 308, a copy of the current Aministrator's certificate, an LIC 200, an LIC 500 and an LIC 501 to be faxed to the Department by close of business on 10/3/22.

Sep 19, 2022Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility does not have enough food for residents in care Staff withhold food from residents Snacks are not being given to residents Call system is in disrepair Facility does not offer activities for residents Back door alarm is in disrepair Meals are not planned with consideration for cultural and religious background and food habits of residents

On 9/19/22 at approximately 11:45am, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jensen arrived unannounced to continue a complaint investigation in to the above listed allegations. LPA Jensen met with Craig Vincelet and explained the purpose of today's visit. Facility does not have enough food for residents in care LPA Jensen observed 7 days of non-perishable food in the facility and in excess of two days of fresh fruit on 8/22/22 and on 9/19/22. Based on an interview with site administrator Craig Vincelet, food is brought in from another site daily and prepped at this facility for meals therefore the majority of the perishable food is not on site. LPA Jensen interviewed 7 staff members and 3 residents. The staff members interviewed consisted of a combination of former and current staff. The majority of staff and residents interviewed indicated they have enough food. LPA Jensen observed lunch service on 9/19/22 and lunch was observed to consist of a bag of chips, a hot dog, and a piece of fruit. Based on interviews conducted and observations made during the course of 2 unannounced visits the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Continued on LIC 9099C.... Unsubstantiated Staff withhold food from residents LPA Jensen interviewed 7 staff members and 3 residents. The staff members interviewed consisted of a combination of former and current staff. The majority of those interviewed denied food was withheld from residents. On 9/19/22 during the course of the visit, LPA Jensen observed 3 residents request snacks outside of the regularly scheduled snack times and 3 of 3 residents were given snacks without hesitation. Based on interviews conducted and observations made during the course of the visit, the allegation that staff withhold food from residents is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Meals are not planned with consideration for cultural and religious background and food habits of residents LPA Jensen interviewed 7 staff members and 3 residents. The staff members interviewed consisted of a combination of former and current staff. The majority of parties interviewed denied having a problem with meals not being planned with consideration for cultural or religious preference. Based on the interviews the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Snacks are not being given to residents LPA Jensen interviewed 7 staff members and 3 residents. The staff members interviewed consisted of a combination of former and current staff. The majority of those interviewed denied the allegation that snacks are not being given to residents. During the course of the visit on 9/19/22 LPA Jensen observed 3 random residents request snacks outside of regularly scheduled snacks times and snacks were given by staff without hesitation therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Call system is in disrepair LPA Jensen interviewed 7 staff members and 3 residents. The staff members interviewed consisted of a combination of former and current staff. On 8/22/22 LPA Jensen tested the alert system with site supervisor in a resident's room. Staff responded to the room in a reasonable amount of time. On 9/19/22 LPA Jensen requested the alert system be activated in a randomly chosen room number while the LPA stood in the medication room with site supervisor Craig Vincelet. Continued on LIC 9099C.... Continued from LIC 9099C.... LPA Jensen observed the alert system accurately identified the room number and initiated an audible sound to alert staff of the activation. The alert system was observed to function as required. Based on interviews conducted and observations made during the testing of the alert system, the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Facility does not offer activities for residents LPA Jensen interviewed a former staff member, a current staff member and 3 residents. The majority of parties interviewed claimed there are sufficient activities available for residents. The parties interviewed advised the facility has activities such as outings, bingo, socialization groups, reading, crosswords and exercise activities. During the course of the visit LPA Jensen observed a putting green for use by the residents. Based on interviews conducted and observations made the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Back door alarm is in disrepair LPA Jensen tested the alarm on the exit door by the men's hall closest to room number 1 at approximately 12:05pm with Craig Vincelet. The exit consists of double doors with delayed egress that should sound an alarm when opened. If a person were to exit these doors there are gates on facility grounds that would have to be opened as well in order to leave the property. The alarm did not sound when the doors were tested. Site Administrator Craig Vincelet replaced the battery in the door alarm. After the battery was replaced, the alarm on the door functioned properly. Based on observations the alarm on the door was not in disrepair but rather out of battery therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding of UNSUBSTANTIATED means that although the violations may have occurred as reported the preponderance of evidence standard was not met. An exit interview was conducted with site supervisor Craig Vincelet and a copy of this report, appeal rights and confidential names list was given.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 19, 2022 · control 27-AS-20220818154005
Jun 8, 2022Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 6/8/22 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Maja Jensen arrived at the facility arrived unannounced to conduct a required one year annual visit. LPA Jensen met with resident care coordinator Tanya Monge and explained the purpose of today's visit. The facility is a single story building with one central entry point designated for universal screening and a sign in policy has been enacted to ensure compliance. The central entry point was observed to be equipped with sanitizer and appropriate infection control signage was posted throughout the facility. Additional signage including but not limited to See Something Say Something, Fire clearance, disaster plan, employee rights and resident rights was observed to be posted in prominent areas and visible to staff and residents. LPA Jensen toured the facility including but not limited to common areas, dining hall, kitchen, pantry, administrative offices, 6 resident rooms and grounds. During the course of the visit LPA Jensen engaged with several residents in care. The kitchen was observed to be clean and sanitary. A seven day supply of non-perishable food and 2 day supply perishable food was observed. A weekly menu was posted in a prominent area visible by residents. The refrigerator was maintained at 37 degrees and the freezer was 0 degrees which is in compliance with regulations. A regular deep cleaning schedule is maintained for the kitchen through an outside vendor. The fire alarm and carbon monoxide detector was checked and observed to be in good working order. The fire extinguishers were last serviced on July 28, 2021 and are in compliance. Adequate lighting was observed throughout the facility. The facility temperature was set at 75 degrees which halls within the required range of 68-85 degrees. Continued on 809C..... The facility operates with delayed egress door system. The resident rooms are divided in to men's and women's halls. A resident room in the men's hall was observed to have a sink that was visibly detaching from the wall-see 812 for room number. The sink in that was detaching from hall had only cold water. The same resident room was observed to have broken glass in the window sill. Two blue colored upholstered chairs in the atrium next to the exit doors were observed to have large stains on the cushions. A door in a resident room leading to the bathroom was observed to be damaged. The signal system in the resident rooms consists of pull cords that when activated send a signal to the medications room. The signal system was observed to be non-functional in a resident room. Water temperature in common area bathrooms measured at 110 degrees which falls within the required range of 105 to 120 degrees. The facility maintains medication in a locked storage room that is inaccessible to residents. Toxins, disinfectants and sharp objects were observed to be stored in locked areas and are inaccessible to residents. The grounds were observed to be clean and in free of obstruction. The facility maintains an adequate supply of PPE. Staff roster was reviewed and all staff were verified as having obtained a California clearance or a criminal record exemption as required by law. Per California Code of Regulations (CCRs) - Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8, deficiencies are being cited on the attached 809D during this visit. The Licensee was provided a copy of their appeal rights. Exit interview held and a copy of report was given.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 8, 2022
May 18, 2022Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident was sexually assaulted by another facility resident

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Bruce Jacobs arrived at the facility and met with Craig Vincelet to deliver investigation findings on the above allegation. This investigation was conducted by the Investigation Branch and LPA Jacobs consisted of site inspections to the facility to conduct interviews with the facility administrator, staff and residents. Law Enforcement reports and medical records were obtained and reviewed. This investigation concluded that a resident made an allegation of being sexually assaulted by another resident at the facility. A medical exam was performed on both the alleged victim and alleged perpetrator and there were no findings of sexual assault. The Police Department conducted an investigation and found no evidence of a physical assault. During interviews with the Police and the Investigator, both the alleged victim and alleged suspect made inconsistent statements. The preponderance of evidence standard has not been met, therefore the above allegation is determined to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the allegation is unsubstantiated means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. Per California Code of Regulations (CCRs) - Title 22, Division 6, no deficiencies are being cited. Exit interview held, copy of report given. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 18, 2022 · control 27-AS-20220107132321

The state marks this report as 2 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 1. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

Feb 9, 2022Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Kitchen is unsanitary. Food storage, preparation and service is inadequate.

On 2/9/22 at 11:30 pm, Licensing Program Analysts (LPA's) Maja Jensen and Bruce Jacobs conducted an unannounced facility visit in regards to a complaint investigation with the above allegations. LPAs met with Med Tech Sunny Loch later Facility Manager Alisha Hale and explained the purpose of today's visit. Throughout the course of the investigation LPA's observed the kitchen, pantry, storage areas and dining hall. LPA's observed food stored in containers that was not covered and not labeled. LPA's observed debris and food remnants on the range. LPA's observed produce with the presence of mold. LPA's observed liquid pooling on the refrigerator shelves and on the lid of a dry food storage container. As a result of this investigation, the Department finds this allegation to be Substantiated. A finding that the complaint is substantiated means that the allegation is valid because the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met. Deficiency(ies) cited on the LIC 9099-D, per Title 22 Regulations, Division 6. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was provided to facility at the end of this visit. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 9, 2022 · control 27-AS-20220208113938

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87555(b)(9) · Plan of correction due date: Mar 9, 2022

(b) The following food service requirements shall apply:..... (9) Procedures which protect the safety, acceptability and nutritive values of food shall be observed in food storage, preparation and service. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based upon LPA's observations the facility did not maintain sanitary conditions of the kitchen as well as safe storage and preparation of food products. LPA's observed food not properly covered. LPA's observed liquid residue at bottom of refrigerator, food particles and debris on the stove. This is a potential risk to clients in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 9, 2022

Plan of correction: Facility agrees to read and understand CCR 87555 and submit a signed statement of understanding. Facility agrees to a deep cleaning of kitchen and food storage area. The facility manager indicated that a kitchen staff member recently ended their employment and new kitchen staff was beginning employment effective 2/10/22. Facility agrees that kitchen staff will be trained and monitored on proper sanitation practices as well as food storage and service.

Feb 9, 2022Facility evaluation reportCase Management - IncidentReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Incident

LPAs Bruce Jacobs and Maja Jensen conducted an unannounced case management visit at the facility and met with Facility Manager Alisha Hale for follow-up on a report of a resident's leaving the facility without permission. The case management visit was conducted by LPA Jacobs and Jensen and consisted of reviews of the facility records and interviews with facility management. The facility management were contacted/interviewed by LPA Jacobs. Information obtained from interviews and record reviews document the resident was under supervision and left the facility against the directions of facility staff. A missing persons report was filed with Law Enforcement and an Incident Report was submitted to the Department. The resident's (R-1) Physician's Report (LIC 602) documents that the resident is able to leave the facility unassisted. Based on all interviews and observations, the resident was able to leave the facility unassisted and this was determined to be a behavior and not inadequate supervision. No deficiencies were identified. Report provided during exit interview.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 9, 2022
Jan 4, 2022Facility evaluation reportCase Management - IncidentReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Incident

On 1-4-22 at 12:47pm, Licensing Program Manager (LPA) Michael Bilger arrived unannounced to conduct a case management visit for a facility reported incident which occurred on 12-22-21. LPA met with Assistant Administrator Alisha Hale and explained the purpose of the visit. Administrator Leah Zubiate was notified of LPAs visit and gave permission for Assistant Administrator to accommodate LPA and sign in her absence. The purpose of today's visit is to collect necessary documentation for investigation bureau. Documents requested included: Current resident roster, staffing schedule, Facility sketch, Administrator certificate, medication logs for resident1 (R1) and (R2), incident reports for R1 and R2, Admission agreements for R1 and R2, Physician's reports for R1 and R2, daily routine schedule, house rules, LIC 501 for staff1 (S1), S2, and S3, and mandated reporter forms for S1, S2, S3. As a result of today's visit, no deficiencies are cited. An exit interview was held with Alisha Hale and a copy of this report was given to Alisha.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 4, 2022

20215 state visits · 7 documents

Dec 9, 2021Facility evaluation reportCase Management - OtherReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Bruce Jacobs, conducted an unannounced case management visit to follow up on an open complaint and pending audit. LPA met with Susan Lo and discussed the purpose of the visit. The purpose of this visit is the Department is conducting a financial audit as a result of an open complaint where additional information was found regarding possible violations of personal rights. The Licensee and/or Licensee Representative for the facility is to provide to the Department all of the following listed documents by 12/30/2021: · P&I Logs for all facilities January 2021 – Current (Due to the volume this request will only cover this year) – Should an exception be noted further documentation for the exception may be needed. · All Wealth Wagon Cards sold for all facilities April 2020 – Current · P&I ledgers for all clients who P&I is being held for, April 2020 - Current · Status of where all P&I funds are kept – if in a financial institution – Bank statements for April 2020 – Current · Cash handling policy and procedures · Copy of Bond for all facilities This information is used for the purpose of auditing and regulating Community Care Facilities and Residential Care Facilities for the Elderly. A copy of this report was provided to the Licensee Representative during this visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 9, 2021
Dec 9, 2021Facility evaluation reportCase Management - IncidentReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Incident

LPA Bruce Jacobs received an incident report from the facility and conducted a follow-up investigation. Licensing received a report of a death of a resident in the care home and the cause of the death was not known. The resident was found unresponsive in the home and paramedics were call and responded. The EMTs performed CPR on the resident for a period of time and then pronounced the resident deceased. A death certificate has not been received by the facility. Facility has agreed to provide CCL with the death certificate of reported cause of death when known. The resident (R-1) was 85 years old at the time of the death. Interviews were conducted and the resident's file was reviewed. LPA determined after interviews and a review of the client's record, that was not sufficient information to prove with a preponderance of evidence that a deficiency occurred or was identified and issued on this visit. Exit interview conducted and report issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 9, 2021
Nov 24, 2021Facility evaluation reportCase Management - IncidentReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Incident

LPA Bruce Jacobs received an incident report from the facility and conducted a follow-up/investigation. Licensing received an report of an altercation between tow clients with the initial report indicating one client (C-1) was the aggressor. During a follow-up review of the incident by this LPA ,information was obtained that the aggressor was taken into custody and recently released back to the facility. The other client (C-2) was treated for minor injuries at the ER and returned to the facility. Staff was in the vicinity at the time of the altercation and intervened. Law Enforcement was contacted and the other client was treated for minor injuries. LPA interviewed the staff involved in the incident who provided additional information. The client (C-1) has not been compliant for medication for his mental health diagnosis for several months. The facility is working to get the client back on his meds and will consult with their psychiatrist to discuss other medications options if unsuccessful. At this time the client is reported to be stable. The client (C-1) has been verbally, but not physically aggressive in the past. LPA determined after interviews and a review of the client's record, that was not sufficient information to prove with a preponderance of evidence that a deficiency occurred or was identified and issued on this visit. Exit interview conducted and report issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 24, 2021
Oct 14, 2021Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff severely neglected resident while in care Staff failed to follow resident's dietary plan.

On 10/14/2021 at 2:25pm, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ashley Boothe arrived unannounced to deliver the findings of complaint investigation with the following allegations: #1 staff severely neglected resident while in care and # 2 staff failed to follow resident's dietary plan. LPA met with Administrator and explained the purpose of today’s visit. LPA was allowed entry into the facility, current census is 34. During the course of the investigation the Department conducted on site inspection, reviewed records, conducted interviews, and conducted a collateral visit on 10/6/2021 to a licensed care facility to interview residents and staff. Continued on 9099 C. Unfounded Continued on from 9099. #1 Staff severely neglected resident while in care Interviews concluded no incidents of severe neglect in care. Staff monitor residents regularly for changes in condition and use daily logs to document shift turnover and residents conditions. Records reviewed updated care plans according to medical assessments. Interviews conclude no residents reported instances of severe neglect in care. Resident one (R1) and R1's responsible party did not report neglect in care for R1. Staff one (S1) and Staff two (S2) reported no instances of observing residents with severe neglect. # 2 Staff failed to follow resident's dietary plan LPA observed residents on special diets to be posted in kitchen linear with medical assessments. Interviews conclude residents on special diets are encouraged to make choices while picking snacks and options are available to meet residents special diet conditions. R1 was not prescribed a special diet per physician's order. It was determined in the course of the investigation based on the information provided through documentation and interview, the aforementioned allegations are unfounded. This agency has investigated the complaint alleging the facility and we have found the allegations false. Per California Code of Regulations (CCRs) - Title 22, Division 6, no deficiencies are being cited. Exit interview held, copy of report given. Continued from 9099A. (#1) LPA observed staff use outlook calendar to coordinate medical appointments. Residents reoccurring appointments are coordinated and staff make appointments based on needs and services. R1's physician ordered blood work, resulted critical, and R1 was transported by emergency medical transport to hospital and admitted. Resident two (R2) was observed to be provided assistance immediately upon request for Crisis. Resident three (R3) stated they had not seen a dentist in two years and wanted to go. LPA observed dental appointments on calendar but none scheduled for R3 during records review and it was unclear if R3 had asked to go or whether delay was due to COVID precautions of dental offices closures. (#2) LPA observed residents to be bathed, groomed, wearing clothing free of spills and debris and no body odor. The house rules state residents need to maintain hygiene and shower at least twice weekly. Interviews conclude residents are provided verbal prompting for reminders and provided assistance as necessary. R1's responsible party reported staff are "not heavy on verbal prompting" for R1 who requires prompting for bathing teeth brushing. Staff one (S1) stated toothbrushes are changed monthly or more often as needed. R1 reported not brushing teeth. R1 requested shave and it is unclear is R1 requested trim or full shave as observed with facial hair. It was determined in the course of the investigation based on the information provided through documentation and interview, the aforementioned allegations are unsubstantiated. A finding that the allegation is unsubstantiated means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. Per California Code of Regulations (CCRs) - Title 22, Division 6, no deficiencies are being cited. Exit interview held, copy of report given.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 14, 2021 · control 27-AS-20210727082534
Sep 27, 2021Facility evaluation reportPOCReport on file

Type of visit: POC

On 09/27/2021 at 8:30am, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ashley Boothe arrived unannounced to conduct a case management visit to clear POC's. LPA contacted Administrator for COVID screening prior to today's visit who confirmed no staff or residents have tested positive within the past 10 days for COVID. LPA arrived, met with Designated staff one (S1), explained the purpose of today’s visit, and was was allowed entry into the facility. Current census 37. Deficiency cited under Title 22 87303(a) has been completed by the extended POC due date including repair work in resident common shower for one of three showers with water damage pulling off the wall, dried leaves and brush, broken gutters, dryer vent dust debris, overgrown trees, and cigarette butts on property grounds not maintained to be completed by 9/3/2021. LPA observed fenced off area to rear of property making areas of Copenhagen Hall, gazebo, and storage shed inaccessible with "No Trespassing" signs posted. S1 stated all repair work completed and plans for preventative maintenance are in place with staff and gardener service. LPA observed shower work repairs completed however caulking in one area pulling up, S1 ordered work service request to repair caulking in the area. Per the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, no deficiencies observed or cited. Exit interview held and a copy of report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 27, 2021
Sep 27, 2021Facility evaluation reportCase Management - IncidentReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Incident

On 09/27/2021 at 8:30am, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ashley Boothe arrived unannounced to conduct a case management visit to follow up on incident reports submitted to the Department. LPA contacted Administrator for COVID screening prior to today's visit who confirmed no staff or residents have tested positive within the past 10 days for COVID. LPA arrived, met with Designated staff one (S1), explained the purpose of today’s visit, and was was allowed entry into the facility. Current census 37. LPA received incident report for incident of altercation between Resident one (R1) and Resident two (R2). Staff two (S2) responded immediately and assessed R1 for injury, contacted Local Law enforcement and responsible parties were notified. R1 declined hospital treatment, follow up with primary care physician scheduled. LPA conducted a case management inspection to ensure proactive measures were put in place to prevent further incidents. If there is another reoccurrence of the same nature the department will require residents be reassessed by their physician to determine if the current placement continues to be appropriate. Per the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, no deficiencies observed or cited. Exit interview held and a copy of report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 27, 2021
Aug 3, 2021Facility evaluation reportPOCReport on file

Type of visit: POC

On 8/3/2021 at 8:25am, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ashley Boothe arrived unannounced to conduct a POC visit. LPA met with Staff one (S1) and Staff two (S2) and explained the purpose of today’s visit. Administrator Leah Zubiate designated S1 and S2 during today's visit. Prior to today's visit LPA contacted Administrator regarding facility risk assessment questions. Administrator confirmed no staff or residents have experienced symptoms within the last 10 days. LPA was allowed entry into the facility, current census is 37. Deficiency cited under Title 22 87303(a) have not been completed. Repair work scheduled through service request orders and in process. S2 stated contractors have come on site and have not returned to complete work. LPA extended POC due date for repair work in resident common shower with one of three showers with water damage pulling off the wall, dried leaves and brush, broken gutters, dryer vent dust debris, overgrown trees, wood rotted gazebo, and cigarette butts on property grounds not maintained to be completed by 9/3/2021. LPA observed repair of fence. Deficiency cited under Title 22 87303(i)(1)(B) Licensee complied with the terms of the POC by POC due date. POC letter provided during today's inspection. LPA requested records for residents. LPA observed one area near the repaired fence with exposed barbed wire where trees had been trimmed. LPA observed case notes for two instances of Resident on (R1) fall and admission to hospital for abnormal bookwork and incident reports not readily available for review during today's visit. LPA observed COVID screening inside facility at designated area in lobby. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report was left at the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 3, 2021

26 of 42 beds were occupied at the September 17, 2026 state visit, the most recent — a count on that day, not an opening.

License holder

Ever Well Health Systems LLC, licensed since 2018.

Operates 2 licensed homes in California. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.

  • Delta at the Portside · Stockton
The state’s totals for this licenseSince 2018, as the state’s facility page counts them
State visits on file
40
Total complaints
14
Substantiated allegations
4
Type A citations
0
Type B citations
2

These are the state’s own totals for this license since 2018, per CDSS records. The state counts them apart from the documents above, and they can differ from what those documents show; the documents say what each visit found. One complaint can contain several allegations.

Compare with homes the same size
This homeTypical
Type A citations00
Type B citations21
Substantiated allegations42
Total complaints146

“Typical” is the statewide median for licensed homes this size. It does not adjust for years licensed, and older licenses have had more visits and reports. The median is across the 1,354 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record. The figures compared are the state’s totals, not the documents.

What the state’s words mean
Routine visita visit the state records as “Required” — a scheduled visit, not one made in answer to a complaintSubstantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents stand in their place.

Open CDSS facility search ↗Report a record errorOperate this home? Respond or correct, free →
Frequently asked questions

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Delta at the Sherwoods

Is Delta at the Sherwoods licensed?

The state lists this license as “Probationary License,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

How many residents is Delta at the Sherwoods licensed for?

42 residents — a mid-size home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

Has Delta at the Sherwoods been cited?

0 Type A and 2 Type B citations since 2018, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. Those records count 40 state visits over the same years.

Is Delta at the Sherwoods still open?

The state does not list this license as closed, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

What does Delta at the Sherwoods cost?

$4,600 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,600–$6,050. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 9 homes with 7 to 49 beds and similar homes within 25 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Delta at the Sherwoods take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Ever Well Health Systems LLC, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. See the homes licensed to Ever Well Health Systems LLC — at least 2 on the state roster.

Is there a hospital nearby?

St. Joseph's Medical Center of Stockton is 3 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Delta at the Sherwoods keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 6 residents, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

Delta at the Sherwoods license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “DELTA AT THE SHERWOODS”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #392700109. The state lists this license as “Probationary License,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • Licensed for 42 residents — a mid-size home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • Licensed to Ever Well Health Systems LLC, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2018, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • 40 state inspection visits since 2018, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 2 Type B citations on file since 2018, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. The same records count 40 state visits in that period.
  • 14 complaints and 4 substantiated allegations on file since 2018, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is September 17, 2026, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Nearby

Other homes nearby

Licensed homes near this one in San Joaquin County, most information on file first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

  • Map

    Stockton · 0.2 mi

    Tarina of Stockton

    Large community · licensed for 160

    Starting rate

    $2,395 a month to start

    Listed by the home on its own website · October 5, 2026

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Dementia: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record
  • Map

    Stockton · 0.7 mi

    The Oaks at Inglewood Assisted Living

    Large community · licensed for 86

    Starting rate

    $2,795 a month to start

    Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
  • Map

    Stockton · 0.1 mi

    Shepherd Homes 2

    Mid-size home · licensed for 15

    Estimated starting rate

    $4,450 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $3,500–$5,850

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
  • Map

    Stockton · 0.1 mi

    Shepherd Homes 1

    Mid-size home · licensed for 15

    Estimated starting rate

    $4,800 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $3,800–$6,350

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
  • Map

    Stockton · 1.0 mi

    Delta Senior Care Home

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $4,050 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $3,300–$5,000

    On the state record

    • Hospice: on the state record
  • Map

    Stockton · 1.4 mi

    Our Lady Perpetual Help Care Home

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $4,650 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $3,800–$5,700

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record

Street maps © Protomaps · © OpenStreetMap

Explore San Joaquin County ↗

Do you run this home?

Add your photos, care details, and contact information. Your public profile is free.

Claim this home
Visiting in person? Print a visit sheetHow we source information
CallAsk this home
DS

Call Delta at the Sherwoods

Stockton · Licensed for 42

(209) 689-3180

From the state licensing record · October 26, 2026

From the home’s website, everwellhealth.org:

(888) 356-1373 · admissions line · seen October 5, 2026

info@everwellhealth.org · general email · seen October 5, 2026

or

Let us do the legwork

  • We ask about availability, price and the care you describe.
  • If it’s a fit, you choose whether they call you. Either way, you get every answer.
Check availabilityFree

Ask Delta at the Sherwoods

Check availability

Request a tour

More days
  • AskThe cost, or your own question

Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.

Covelight Care

A free directory of every licensed care home in California, built from CDSS public records.

Find your next step

Find a homeSaved homesHelp me chooseCheck a home

Make sense of care

Care guidesMedi-Cal & careYour rightsHow we workAbout this site

Work with Covelight

For professionalsFor home operatorsSuggest a correctionDevelopersContact us

© 2026 Covelight Care LLC. Homes never pay to appear or rank higher.

Covelight Care is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the sources named on this page.

3104 O St Unit #1023, Sacramento, CA 95816

PrivacyTermsText messages