Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Shepherd Homes 2

Mid-size home·Licensed for 15·Stockton, California

Licensed since 2015Licence #397005616
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchairState licensing record · September 27, 2026
  • Estimated starting rate$3,900 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $3,050–$5,150
  • Home sizeLicensed for 15Mid-size care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit14 of 15 beds occupiedJuly 29, 2026 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitJuly 29, 2026CDSS inspection record

Shepherd Homes 2 is a mid-size care home in Stockton — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 15 residents since 2015. Dementia care, hospice care and bedridden care are not on file.

Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Shepherd Homes 2

Is Shepherd Homes 2 licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

How many residents is Shepherd Homes 2 licensed for?

15 residents — a mid-size home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Has Shepherd Homes 2 been cited?

2 Type A and 3 Type B citations since 2015, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 16 state visits over the same years.

Is Shepherd Homes 2 still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Shepherd Homes 2 cost?

$3,900 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,050–$5,150. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 24 homes with 7 to 49 beds and similar homes within 33 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Shepherd Homes 2 take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Espiritu, Inc., per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. See the homes licensed to Espiritu, Inc. — at least 2 on the state roster.

Is there a hospital nearby?

St. Joseph's Medical Center of Stockton is 3 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Shepherd Homes 2 keep a resident on hospice?

Not on file — the state’s record does not list hospice care on this license. Ask: “Can a resident stay here on hospice, and under what conditions?”

Shepherd Homes 2 license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “SHEPHERD HOMES 2”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #397005616. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed for 15 residents — a mid-size home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed to Espiritu, Inc., per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2015, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 16 state inspection visits since 2015, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 2 Type A and 3 Type B citations on file since 2015, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 16 state visits in that period.
  • 4 complaints and 5 substantiated allegations on file since 2015, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is July 29, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 15 residents
  • Dementia / memory careNot on file · ask the home
  • Hospice careNot on file · ask the home
  • BedriddenNot on file · ask the home

State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. ALL MAY BE NON-AMBULATORY.

935 - ELDERLY

CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026

As needs change

5 questions to ask the home — nothing on file yet
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver not on file

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation not on file

    Ask: “If memory loss develops, what would change — and when would a move be needed?”

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$3,900a month to start

Likely $3,050–$5,150

From 24 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$3,900a month

Likely $3,050–$5,300

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room

Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.

  • Starting monthly rate$3,900likely $3,050–$5,150

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 24 homes with 7 to 49 beds and similar homes within 33 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $3,050–$5,300
$3,900
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $3,700–$8,350
$5,900
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 24 homes with 7 to 49 beds and similar homes within 33 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

24 homes like this within 33 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,000–$5,300.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 24 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 5964 Glen Street, Stockton, CA 95207Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2021, the state has filed 12 documents for this home, and its records count 16 visits since 2015. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on July 29, 2026 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Unsubstantiated.”

On file since
2021
State visits
16
Most recent visit
July 29, 2026
Occupied at that visit
14 of 15 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 4 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated September 14, 2022 to July 29, 2026. 4 of the 4 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (2), “Unsubstantiated” (2). 4 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 4 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations2typical 0
  • Type B citations3typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations5typical 0
  • Total complaints4typical 1

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 327 licensed mid-size homes (7–15 beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2015.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202612120252202024110202334020222212021110

The last 36 months — 6 of 12 documents

20261 state visit · 2 documents
Jul 29, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff mishandled a resident's personal property

On 7-29-2026 at 12:17pm, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Bilger arrived unannounced to deliver findings for the allegation noted above. LPA met with Administrator Edgar Espiritu and explained the purpose of the visit. During this investigation, LPA conducted interviews with four staff members and four residents in care. LPA also interviewed an additional witness. LPA also reviewed facility file documentation including physician's report, needs and service plan, and inventory sheet for resident1 (R1). Additionally, LPA conducted a facility observation on 7-15-2026 and 7-29-2026 as part of this investigation. Allegation: Staff mishandled a resident's personal property. LPA conducted interviews, record reviews, and observations as noted above. Based on interviews and record reviews, it was revealed that resident1 (R1) previously expressed various personal items missing and mishandled by staff. Interviews conducted did not reveal any corroborated statements of R1 in possession of these items. A review of R1's inventory sheet did not reveal the identified alleged missing and mishandled items. An additional interview with witness1 (W1) further revealed that R1 was not in possession of the alleged missing and mishandled items while residing at facility. {Cont. on 9099C} Unsubstantiated LPA's observation of facility did not reveal additional evidence of staff entering resident rooms and taking personal items out of the rooms or otherwise mishandling resident personal items. As a result, there is not a preponderance of evidence to conclude that staff mishandled a resident's personal property, therefore, this allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding of unsubstantiated means he allegation may have happened or is valid, but there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator and a copy of this report was provided. Appeal rights provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 29, 2026 · control 27-AS-20260715143856
Jul 29, 2026Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident sustained 2nd and 3rd degree burns due to lack of supervision Staff did not obtain medical care for resident Staff do not ensure resident's showering needs are met

On 7-29-2026 at 9:52am, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Bilger arrived at the facility unannounced to deliver and discuss findings for the allegations noted above. LPA met with Administrator Edgar Espiritu and explained the purpose of the visit. During this investigation, LPA conducted interviews with four staff members, two residents in care and one additional witness. Additionally, LPA reviewed facility file documentation including incident reports, medication log sheets, physician’s report, progress notes, and bath/shower schedule. LPA also reviewed additional medical records as part of this investigation. Allegation: Resident sustained 2nd and 3rd degree burns due to lack of supervision. LPA conducted interviews and record reviews as noted above. Based on interviews and record reviews it was determined that on 4-29-2026 at approximately 11:00am the facility cook handed a hot cup of noodle soup to resident1 (R1) and left the room. Interviews conducted further revealed that an overbed table was not utilized for support and safety. {Cont. on 9099C} Substantiated Additionally, it was revealed that a caregiver was not present to assist and ensure safety given resident was not utilizing an overbed table. After the soup was handed to R1, R1 spelt the soup on her upper left thigh area at approximately 11:35am which initially caused redness. It was later revealed on 5-1-2026 that R1 sustained a 2nd degree burn. As a result, there is a preponderance of evidence to conclude that staff did not utilize an appropriate supervision procedure given the knowledge that R1 was not using an overbed table or other device to support R1’s self feeding of a hot liquid food item, resulting in risk and eventual injury to R1, therefore, this allegation is SUBSTANTIATED. Allegation: Staff did not obtain medical care for a resident. LPA conducted interviews and record reviews as noted above. Based on interviews and record reviews it was determined that on 4-29-2026 at approximately 11:00am the facility cook handed a hot cup of noodle soup to resident1 (R1) and walked away. After the soup was handed to R1, R1 spelt the soup on her upper left thigh area at approximately 11:35am which initially caused redness. It was further revealed that after learning of the incident, staff did not initially call 911 for immediate evaluation and determination for treatment. At approximately 3-3:30pm on 4-29-2026, an outside medical professional observed the redness and gave a verbal direction to apply ointment. It was later revealed on 5-1-2026 that R1 sustained a 2nd degree burn. Additional interviews revealed that given this incident, 911 was not called and should have been called. As a result, there is a preponderance of evidence to conclude that staff did not utilize the regulatory requirement of calling 911 as noted in Section 87465(g) when the injury and imminent threat to health occurred, therefore, this allegation is SUBSTANTIATED. Allegation: Staff do not ensure resident’s showering needs are met. LPA conducted interviews and record reviews as noted above. Based on interviews and record reviews it was determined that R1 was admitted to facility in March 2026. Shower records revealed that R1 was offered showers on 3-20-2026, 3-28-2026, 4-5-2026, and 4-10-2026 with refusals by R1 noted. Records did not reveal additional shower offerings beyond 4-10-2026 and up to R1’s discharge on or about 4-30-2026. Furthermore, records did not reveal additional shower offerings after R1 refused. A review of R1’s physician’s report revealed that R1 was unable to bathe self and required assistance. As a result, the preponderance of evidence standard is met, and this allegation is SUBSTANTIATED. {Cont. on 9099C} The following deficiencies were observed (see LIC 9099-D) and cited from the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, and Health and Safety Codes. Failure to correct the deficiencies may result in additional civil penalties. An immediate civil penalty in the amount of five-hundred dollars ($500) was issued in addition to citation due to a violation resulting in a severe injury. At the time of the complaint visit, the issuance of an additional Civil Penalty was still being determined, and the licensee was informed that an additional civil penalty might be assessed based on Health and Safety Code § 1569.49(f). An exit interview was conducted with Administrator , and a copy of this report was provided. Appeal rights provided. LIC 811 provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 29, 2026 · control 27-AS-20260506142813

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: HSC 1569.312(e) · Plan of correction due date: Jul 30, 2026

1569.312 Basic Service Requirements. (e) Monitoring the activities of the residents while they are under the supervision of the facility to ensure their general health, safety, and well-being. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews and record reviews, Licensee did not ensure adequate level of supervision for R1 resulting in a severe injury to R1. This posed an immediate health and safety risk to resident in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 29, 2026

Plan of correction: Licensee to ensure completed staff training on proper supervision of residents in care. Training date to be submitted to LPA by POC due date. Proof of completed training to be sent to LPA no later than 8/14/2026. Licensee to develop and submit a protocol outlining proper supervision procedures of residents. Protocol to include various examples of scenarios which constitute certain levels of supervision. Protocol to be submitted to LPA by POC due date.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87465(g) · Plan of correction due date: Jul 30, 2026

87465 Incidental Medical and Dental Care (g) The licensee shall immediately telephone 9-1-1 if an injury or other circumstance has resulted in an imminent threat to a resident’s health…This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews and record reviews, Licensee did not ensure the immediate call to 911 after learning of hot soup spilling onto R1’s thigh area. This posed an immediate health and safety risk to resident in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 29, 2026

Plan of correction: Licensee will ensure completed staff training on Section 87465(g). Training to include proper response to emergencies and when to call 911. Training date to be submitted to LPA by POC due date. Proof of completed training to be submitted to LPA no later than 8/14/2026. Licensee to develop and submit a protocol outlining procedures of when to call 911. Protocol to include various examples of scenarios which constitute a call to 911 Protocol to be sent to LPA by POC due date.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: HSC 1569.312(a) · Plan of correction due date: Aug 7, 2026

1569.312 Basic Service Requirements. (a) Care and supervision as defined in Section 1569.2. This requirement was not met as evidence by: Based on record reviews and interviews, Licensee did not ensure additional offerings of showers and shower assistance to R1 in relation to length of R1’s residency at facility. This posed a potential health, safety, and resident rights risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 29, 2026

Plan of correction: Licensee to develop and submit a plan outlining how staff will consistently meet and/or attempt to meet residents’ showering needs and other assistance with activities of daily living needs. Plan to be submitted to LPA by POC due date. Licensee will read Section 1569.2 and submit a written declaration of understanding of the definition of “care and supervision” to LPA by POC due date.

20252 state visits · 2 documents
Nov 3, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Albert Johnson conducted an unannounced annual visit on this date. LPA met with Ruth and explained the purpose of the visit. The facility is on two separate parcels with connecting gate and a shared common area. LPA inspected physical plant including but not limited to kitchen, bedrooms, bathrooms, living and dining room area. LPA observed the facility. LPA observed sufficient furniture and lighting throughout the facility. LPA observed sufficient seven day non-perishable and two day perishable food supplies. Hot water temperature was measured at 118 degrees Fahrenheit in resident bathroom sink, which is within the required range of 105 to 120 degrees. Fire extinguishers and smoke detectors are current and in compliance with fire safety. Carbon dioxide monitor present. Fire drill was conducted on 9/20/2025 LPA observed centrally stored medications. LPA reviewed and compared resident medication vs. resident medication logs. LPA reviewed resident and staff files, including criminal record clearances. All staff today are associated to the facility. First aid kit was checked and is complete. Per California Code of Regulations, Title 22 Division 6, Chapter 8, No deficiencies were cited during this visit. Exit interview held and a report given at the conclusion of the visitthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 3, 2025
Sep 16, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Incident

Licensing Program Analyst Albert Johnson arrived to conduct an unannounced case management visit for an incident reported to the department. LPA conducted a file review for R1 with the assistance of the Administrator. R1's LIC 602 was current. The Department conducted a case management visit to investigate a special incident report received. The incident report detailed that, R1 was sent out to the ER for generalized weakness and off her baseline. R1 has since returned to the facility with no new orders. R1 requested to be returned back to Shepherd home in lieu of a rehabilitation center. No citation given. Exit interview.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 16, 2025
20241 state visit · 1 document
Nov 18, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Albert Johnson conducted an unannounced annual visit on this date. LPA met with Edgar Espiritu and explained the purpose of the visit. The facility is on two separate parcels with connecting gate and a shared common area. LPA inspected physical plant including but not limited to kitchen, bedrooms, bathrooms, living and dining room area. LPA observed the facility. LPA observed sufficient furniture and lighting throughout the facility. LPA observed sufficient seven day non-perishable and two day perishable food supplies. Hot water temperature was measured at 118 degrees Fahrenheit in resident bathroom sink, which is within the required range of 105 to 120 degrees. Fire extinguishers and smoke detectors are current and in compliance with fire safety. Carbon dioxide monitor present. Fire drill was conducted on 9/20/2024 LPA observed centrally stored medications. LPA reviewed and compared resident medication vs. resident medication logs. LPA reviewed resident and staff files, including criminal record clearances. All staff today are associated to the facility. First aid kit was checked and is complete. Per California Code of Regulations, Title 22 Division 6, Chapter 8, No deficiencies were cited during this visit. Exit interview held and a report given at the conclusion of the visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 18, 2024
20231 state visit · 1 document
Oct 17, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Albert Johnson conducted an unannounced annual visit on this date. LPA met with Edgar Espiritu and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA inspected physical plant including but not limited to kitchen, bedrooms, bathrooms, living and dining room area. LPA observed the facility. LPA observed sufficient furniture and lighting throughout the facility. LPA observed sufficient seven day non-perishable and two day perishable food supplies. Hot water temperature was measured at 115 degrees Fahrenheit in resident bathroom sink, which is within the required range of 105 to 120 degrees. Fire extinguishers and smoke detectors are current and in compliance with fire safety. Carbon dioxide monitor present LPA observed centrally stored medications. LPA reviewed and compared resident medication vs. resident medication logs. LPA reviewed resident and staff files, including criminal record clearances. All staff today are associated to the facility. First aid kit was checked and is complete. Per California Code of Regulations, Title 22 Division 6, Chapter 8, No deficiencies were observed during this visit. Exit interview held and a report given at the conclusion of the visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 17, 2023
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in San Joaquin County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore San Joaquin County