Oakmont Of Escondido Hills is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Escondido Hills, San Diego County, California — state license #374604457, licensed for 160 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 9 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated April 23, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

6 homes in view

Oakmont Of Escondido Hills

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 160 residents · Escondido Hills, CA · San Diego County
LicensedWheelchairMemory careHospiceBedridden
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #374604457, held since 2021 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
3012 Bear Valley Parkway · Escondido Hills, San Diego County
Phone
(760) 735-8084
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 160 residents
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careApproved for 20 residents
Bedridden careApproved for 15 residents

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OLDER. 160 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 15 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 20.State service designations940 - ADULTS · 983 - RCFE / DEMENTIAthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 9 times and filed 9 documents. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on April 23, 2026 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Unsubstantiated.”

Most recent state visit
April 23, 2026
Occupancy at that visit
126 of 160 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 3 documents with transcribed findings, dated October 31, 2024 to April 23, 2026. 3 of the 3 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Unsubstantiated” (3). 3 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 3 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 5 of 9 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20261 state visit · 1 document
Apr 23, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not seek timely medical care for resident. Licensee did not ensure resident's medication was administered by an appropriately skilled professional.

On April 23, 2026, the California Department of Social Services/Community Care Licensing (CDSS/CCL) Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Antonine Richard, conducted a follow-up unannounced complaint visit. The LPA met with the Administrator (A1), Bassem EL- Rabaa, and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation included collecting records and touring the facility. On April 22, 2026, the Department obtained various documents, including the Personnel Report LIC 500 (dated 04/22/26) and the Resident Roster (dated 04/22/26). The Department reviewed and collected documents for residents R1 and R2, including the Admission Agreement, the physician's Report, the Medical Assessment, and the Medication Administration Records (MARs). The Department also obtained two Med Techs' training certificates dated 12/11/2022 and 04/09/2025. The Department interviewed the Administrator (A1), two Med Techs (MT1-MT2), two staff members (S1-S2), and six Residents (R3-R8). Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 23, 2026 · control 18-AS-20240611150248
20243 state visits · 3 documents
Nov 14, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not seek timely medical care for resident in care Facility not meeting residents needs in a timely manner Facility does not have adequate number of staff Facility is charging extra fees not on care plan

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA)Tiffany Holmes conducted an unannounced complaint visit to the facility to deliver findings on the above-mentioned allegations. LPA gained access to the facility, identified herself, and met with John Brennan, Executive Director to discuss the purpose of the visit. LPA conducted investigation visit and was able to interview residents, facility staff, and outside sources. LPA also reviewed records, and conducted a physical inspection of the facility. It was alleged that staff did not seek timely medical care for resident in care. Interviews revealed that on or aorund 11/19/2021 Resident 1 (R1) was sent out to recieve medical attention due to pain in their leg. Interviews revealed that R1 returned to the facility early the next morning. Interviews with staff did not mention any falls that R1 allegedly suffered. Interviews revealed that if R1 would have fallen that they wouldn't have been able to get them up and the paramedics would have been called. Intervithe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 14, 2024 · control 08-AS-20211124122900
Oct 31, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff neglect resulted in a resident being hospitalized. Resident left soiled for an extended period of time while in care. Staff are not following a resident's needs and services plan.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Debbie Correia conducted an unannounced visit to conclude a complaint investigation. LPA was granted entry after identifying herself and discussed the purpose of the visit with*. The Department's investigation included resident, facility, and outside source records reviews and interviews. It was alleged that staff neglect resulted in Resident 1 (R1) being admitted to several hospital stays. A resident records review revealed R1 was admitted to the facility on November 1, 2016, with a primary diagnosis of paralysis to their left side of their body from suffering a stroke. Review of resident records revealed R1 required assistance with dressing and ambulation due to their paralysis. Resident records reviews and an interview with Staff 1 (S1) the Service Health Director, revealed R1 is a two person assist, required a lift for transfers to use the bathroom and for showers. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 31, 2024 · control 08-AS-20211220132223
Aug 23, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20231 state visit · 1 document
Aug 28, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations0typical 1
Type B citations0typical 1
Substantiated complaints0typical 2
Total complaints3typical 7
State visits on file9typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2021.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20261102024330202311020222202021220
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — San Diego County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (760) 735-8084

Is Oakmont Of Escondido Hills licensed?

Yes — Oakmont Of Escondido Hills is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Escondido Hills (San Diego County): California license #374604457, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 160 residents. State records list 9 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated April 23, 2026, was marked “Unsubstantiated” by the state.

Can Oakmont Of Escondido Hills care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Oakmont Of Escondido Hills with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, hospice care, and bedridden. Clearances describe what the license permits, not day-to-day staffing — confirm current scope and availability with the home directly on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OLDER. 160 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 15 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 20.

How much does Oakmont Of Escondido Hills cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Oakmont Of Escondido Hills's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in San Diego County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Oakmont Of Escondido Hills accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Oakmont Of Escondido Hills is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

126 of 160 beds occupied (79%) when the state visited on April 23, 2026. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Oakmont Of Escondido Hills?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 9 state visits and 9 dated documents since 2021 for Oakmont Of Escondido Hills; 3 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated April 23, 2026, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

3 transcribed reports on file

2026

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not seek timely medical care for resident. Licensee did not ensure resident's medication was administered by an appropriately skilled professional.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On April 23, 2026, the California Department of Social Services/Community Care Licensing (CDSS/CCL) Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Antonine Richard, conducted a follow-up unannounced complaint visit. The LPA met with the Administrator (A1), Bassem EL- Rabaa, and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation included collecting records and touring the facility. On April 22, 2026, the Department obtained various documents, including the Personnel Report LIC 500 (dated 04/22/26) and the Resident Roster (dated 04/22/26). The Department reviewed and collected documents for residents R1 and R2, including the Admission Agreement, the physician's Report, the Medical Assessment, and the Medication Administration Records (MARs). The Department also obtained two Med Techs' training certificates dated 12/11/2022 and 04/09/2025. The Department interviewed the Administrator (A1), two Med Techs (MT1-MT2), two staff members (S1-S2), and six Residents (R3-R8). UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, April 23, 2026 · control 18-AS-20240611150248

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not seek timely medical care for resident in care Facility not meeting residents needs in a timely manner Facility does not have adequate number of staff Facility is charging extra fees not on care plan
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA)Tiffany Holmes conducted an unannounced complaint visit to the facility to deliver findings on the above-mentioned allegations. LPA gained access to the facility, identified herself, and met with John Brennan, Executive Director to discuss the purpose of the visit. LPA conducted investigation visit and was able to interview residents, facility staff, and outside sources. LPA also reviewed records, and conducted a physical inspection of the facility. It was alleged that staff did not seek timely medical care for resident in care. Interviews revealed that on or aorund 11/19/2021 Resident 1 (R1) was sent out to recieve medical attention due to pain in their leg. Interviews revealed that R1 returned to the facility early the next morning. Interviews with staff did not mention any falls that R1 allegedly suffered. Interviews revealed that if R1 would have fallen that they wouldn't have been able to get them up and the paramedics would have been called. InterviCDSS inspection report, November 14, 2024 · control 08-AS-20211124122900
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff neglect resulted in a resident being hospitalized. Resident left soiled for an extended period of time while in care. Staff are not following a resident's needs and services plan.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Debbie Correia conducted an unannounced visit to conclude a complaint investigation. LPA was granted entry after identifying herself and discussed the purpose of the visit with*. The Department's investigation included resident, facility, and outside source records reviews and interviews. It was alleged that staff neglect resulted in Resident 1 (R1) being admitted to several hospital stays. A resident records review revealed R1 was admitted to the facility on November 1, 2016, with a primary diagnosis of paralysis to their left side of their body from suffering a stroke. Review of resident records revealed R1 required assistance with dressing and ambulation due to their paralysis. Resident records reviews and an interview with Staff 1 (S1) the Service Health Director, revealed R1 is a two person assist, required a lift for transfers to use the bathroom and for showers. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, October 31, 2024 · control 08-AS-20211220132223

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 9 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing. No substantiated complaints are on file.

Type A citations
0
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
0
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
0
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
3
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
9
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(760) 735-8084
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Oakmont Of Escondido Hills? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.