Westmont Of Encinitas is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Encinitas, San Diego County, California — state license #374604318, licensed for 101 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 15 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2022, the most recent dated June 19, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

2 homes in view

Westmont Of Encinitas

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 101 residents · Encinitas, CA · San Diego County
LicensedWheelchairHospiceMemory care not on fileBedridden not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #374604318, held since 2021 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
1920 South El Camino Real · Encinitas, San Diego County
Phone
(760) 452-6037
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 101 residents
Dementia / memory careNot on file — ask the home
Hospice careApproved for 10 residents
Bedridden careNot on file — ask the home

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 101 NON-AMBULATORY. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR TEN (10).State service designation935 - ELDERLYthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2022, the state has visited this home 16 times and filed 15 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated June 19, 2026.

Most recent state visit
June 19, 2026
Occupancy at the May 31, 2024 visit
80 of 101 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 3 documents with transcribed findings, dated October 31, 2023 to May 31, 2024. 3 of the 3 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Unsubstantiated” (3). 3 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 3 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 12 of 15 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20262 state visits · 2 documents
Jun 19, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 21, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20252 state visits · 3 documents
Nov 13, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 7, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 7, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20245 state visits · 6 documents
Dec 3, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 31, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident was sexually assaulted while in care.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Sabel Martinez, conducted an unannounced a follow up complaint investigation visit and delivered complaint findings. The LPA introduced himself and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Operation Specialist Benjie Doctolero. Throughout the investigation, the Department secured records and conducted interviews with external and internal sources, including staff and residents. It was alleged a resident was sexually assaulted while in care by Staff #1 (S1). (See 811 – Confidential Names Form). A review of R1's LIC 602 (Physician's report), and Preplacement Appraisal, collected from the facility, revealed R1 was considered ambulatory, in good health, diabetic, able to communicate, but may be confused and disoriented. (See LIC 9099C for continuation of report.) Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 31, 2024 · control 08-AS-20220509093246
Mar 12, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Licensee did not address resident's change in condition.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nacole Patterson conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings regarding the above complaint allegation. LPA introduced herself and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Business Office Director Angie De Asis. During the visit Senior Regional VP of Operations Steven Harms was present at the facility and met with LPA. On 2/5/24 it was alleged that the Licensee did not address a change in condition for resident 1 (R1), resulting in numerous falls. The Department’s investigation consisted of unannounced facility visits, interviews with facility staff, residents, outside sources, and records review. Staff interview revealed that upon observing the increase in weakness and falls, the Licensee updated R1's care plan to level 6 to reflect the need for stand-by assistance for all activities of daily living (ADLs). Staff interview, corroborated by facility and outside source records, revealed that staff contacted the family for each of R1's falls, communicatthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 12, 2024 · control 08-AS-20240205151341
Mar 12, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 13, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 6, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20231 state visit · 1 document
Oct 31, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: - Licensee did not protect resident from financial abuse

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Carmen Lopez conducted an unannounced complaint visit to open a complaint investigation. While at the facility LPA investigated and delivered findings regarding the above-mentioned allegation. LPA identified herself and was granted entry by Karen Solomon, concierge. LPA stated the purpose of the visit and reviewed the findings of the complaint with Resident Service Director Katie Ferguson. The Department’s investigation consisted of interviews with staff and resident, and records review of relevant documents pertinent to this investigation. On October 26, 2023, it was alleged that the facility did not protect a resident from financial abuse. It was specifically alleged that resident #1 (R1) purchased and withdrew an excessive amount of funds within the last two months due to resident #2 (R2) prompting R1 to purchase items for them. Interview with an outside source said that R1 had no issues with their finances or with any person(s) at the facility. Therethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 31, 2023 · control 08-AS-20231023105344
Beside homes the same size
Type A citations0typical 1
Type B citations0typical 1
Substantiated complaints0typical 2
Total complaints3typical 7
State visits on file16typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2021.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20262202025230202456020232202022220
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — San Diego County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?
How are care plans reviewed when a resident’s needs change?

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (760) 452-6037

Is Westmont Of Encinitas licensed?

Yes — Westmont Of Encinitas is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Encinitas (San Diego County): California license #374604318, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 101 residents. State records list 15 inspection and complaint documents since 2022; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated June 19, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Westmont Of Encinitas care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Westmont Of Encinitas with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory and hospice care; it does not list dementia / memory care and bedridden. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 101 NON-AMBULATORY. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR TEN (10).

How much does Westmont Of Encinitas cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Westmont Of Encinitas's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in San Diego County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Westmont Of Encinitas accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Westmont Of Encinitas is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

80 of 101 beds occupied (79%) when the state visited on May 31, 2024. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Westmont Of Encinitas?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 16 state visits and 15 dated documents since 2022 for Westmont Of Encinitas; 3 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated May 31, 2024, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

3 transcribed reports on file

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident was sexually assaulted while in care.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Sabel Martinez, conducted an unannounced a follow up complaint investigation visit and delivered complaint findings. The LPA introduced himself and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Operation Specialist Benjie Doctolero. Throughout the investigation, the Department secured records and conducted interviews with external and internal sources, including staff and residents. It was alleged a resident was sexually assaulted while in care by Staff #1 (S1). (See 811 – Confidential Names Form). A review of R1's LIC 602 (Physician's report), and Preplacement Appraisal, collected from the facility, revealed R1 was considered ambulatory, in good health, diabetic, able to communicate, but may be confused and disoriented. (See LIC 9099C for continuation of report.) UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, May 31, 2024 · control 08-AS-20220509093246
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLicensee did not address resident's change in condition.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nacole Patterson conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings regarding the above complaint allegation. LPA introduced herself and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Business Office Director Angie De Asis. During the visit Senior Regional VP of Operations Steven Harms was present at the facility and met with LPA. On 2/5/24 it was alleged that the Licensee did not address a change in condition for resident 1 (R1), resulting in numerous falls. The Department’s investigation consisted of unannounced facility visits, interviews with facility staff, residents, outside sources, and records review. Staff interview revealed that upon observing the increase in weakness and falls, the Licensee updated R1's care plan to level 6 to reflect the need for stand-by assistance for all activities of daily living (ADLs). Staff interview, corroborated by facility and outside source records, revealed that staff contacted the family for each of R1's falls, communicatCDSS inspection report, March 12, 2024 · control 08-AS-20240205151341

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewed- Licensee did not protect resident from financial abuse
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Carmen Lopez conducted an unannounced complaint visit to open a complaint investigation. While at the facility LPA investigated and delivered findings regarding the above-mentioned allegation. LPA identified herself and was granted entry by Karen Solomon, concierge. LPA stated the purpose of the visit and reviewed the findings of the complaint with Resident Service Director Katie Ferguson. The Department’s investigation consisted of interviews with staff and resident, and records review of relevant documents pertinent to this investigation. On October 26, 2023, it was alleged that the facility did not protect a resident from financial abuse. It was specifically alleged that resident #1 (R1) purchased and withdrew an excessive amount of funds within the last two months due to resident #2 (R2) prompting R1 to purchase items for them. Interview with an outside source said that R1 had no issues with their finances or with any person(s) at the facility. ThereCDSS inspection report, October 31, 2023 · control 08-AS-20231023105344

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 16 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing. No substantiated complaints are on file.

Type A citations
0
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
0
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
0
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
3
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
16
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(760) 452-6037
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Westmont Of Encinitas? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.