Nir Community Iii is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in San Diego, San Diego County, California — state license #374604264, licensed for 6 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 10 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated December 24, 2025 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

12 homes in view

Nir Community Iii

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Small home, 6 residents · San Diego, CA · San Diego County
LicensedWheelchairHospiceBedriddenMemory care not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #374604264, held since 2019 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
10975 Janice Ct · San Diego, San Diego County
Phone
(858) 414-5095
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 6 residents
Dementia / memory careNot on file — ask the home
Hospice careApproved for 6 residents
Bedridden careApproved for 1 resident

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR SIX (6) NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH ONE (1) MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR SIX (6) RESIDENTS.State service designation935 - ELDERLYthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 11 times and filed 10 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated December 24, 2025.

Most recent state visit
December 24, 2025
Occupancy at the November 6, 2025 visit
4 of 6 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 4 documents with transcribed findings, dated May 17, 2024 to November 6, 2025. 4 of the 4 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (3). 4 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 4 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 9 of 10 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20253 state visits · 5 documents
Dec 24, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 6, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not provide adequate supervision resulting in residents wandering away from facility

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Natasha Persaud conducted an unannounced visit to commence a complaint investigation. LPA identified herself and was allowed entry into the facility by Staff, Conchita Gallardo. LPA discussed the allegation mentioned above wtih staff present. Administrator, Faria Huq and Licensee, Rana Huq arrived during the visit. During today's visit, LPA briefly toured the facility, reviewed records, interviewed staff, and residents. It was alleged staff did not provide adequate supervision resulting in a resident wandering away from facility. It was reported Resident #1 (R1) wandered away from the facility on 10/29/25. R1's Physician's Report dated 05/08/2023 indicated R1 was ambulatory, and had a diagnosis of a Major Neurocognitive disorder. It also indicated R1 was unable to leave the facility unassisted. On 10/29/25, R1 wandered out the front door and entered the neighbor's house requesting police assistance. Staff interviewed stated one caregiver was assisting athe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 6, 2025 · control 08-AS-20251029134201
Nov 6, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 30, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Absence of supervision at night Staff are leaving residents in soiled diapers for extended periods of time Licensee did not provide the required quantity or quality of food to meet the needs of the residents Licensee is charging for fees not outlined in admission agreement

LPM II Donna Teutschel conducted a telephone conference with Licensee/Administrator, Rana Huq. A review was conducted of the allegations listed and investigative details available.to date. Facility has night time sleep staff but residents have a call button system that will alert staff if they need assistance. If staff are alerted by a resident to have diaper changed staff respond. No evidence was provided regarding leaving residents in soiled diapers for extended period of time or that food quality was not acceptable. The service fee invoiced for cable was a one-time fee and that was performed by the licensee in procurring a cable box and hooking the cable up to the residents room, cable box and television which was verbally agreed to. The Department is unable to prove or disprove the allegations and the findings are determined to be Unsubstantiated. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 30, 2025 · control 08-AS-20210506084436
Jun 30, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: -Staff refused to assist resident with transfer -Staff required resident to wear diaper -Staff did not ensure resident was hydrated -Staff did not seek medical attention for resident timely

LPM II Donna Teutschel conducted a telephone conference with Licensee/Administrator, Rana Huq. A review was conducted of the allegations listed and investigative details available.to date. The Department is unable to prove or disprove the allegations and the findings are determined to be Unsubstantiated. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 30, 2025 · control 08-AS-20230228093653
20243 state visits · 3 documents
Dec 18, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 7, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 17, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Licensee did not treat pest

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Natasha Persaud conducted an unannounced visit to conclude the complaint investigation regarding the above-mentioned allegation. LPA met with Staff, Conchita Gallardo. During the investigation, the facility was toured, records reviewed, and interviews conducted with staff, residents, and outside sources. It was alleged the licensee did not treat pest. It was reported a cockroach was observed in Resident #1’s (R1) cup and around the room approximately two (2) to three (3) months ago. It was also reported the roach was observed two (2) weeks ago. Conflicting statements were made. Staff interviews revealed they have not observed any pest or roaches. However, they are taking precautionary measure by spraying inside and outside of the facility once a week. Outside sources revealed the roach was observed but it was only one (1) time a few months ago and there have not been any other observations of pest or roaches. Resident interviews confirmed there were nothe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 17, 2024 · control 08-AS-20240506103142
20231 state visit · 1 document
Dec 14, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations1typical 0
Type B citations0typical 0
Substantiated complaints1typical 0
Total complaints4typical 0
State visits on file11typical 6
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 5,773 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2019.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated2025351202433020231102021110
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — San Diego County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
Ask how the 2025 complaint investigation report was corrected — what changed?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (858) 414-5095

Is Nir Community Iii licensed?

Yes — Nir Community Iii is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in San Diego (San Diego County): California license #374604264, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 6 residents. State records list 10 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated December 24, 2025, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Nir Community Iii care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Nir Community Iii with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, hospice care, and bedridden; it does not list dementia / memory care. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR SIX (6) NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH ONE (1) MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR SIX (6) RESIDENTS.

How much does Nir Community Iii cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Nir Community Iii's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in San Diego County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Nir Community Iii accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Nir Community Iii is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

4 of 6 beds occupied (67%) when the state visited on November 6, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Nir Community Iii?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 11 state visits and 10 dated documents since 2021 for Nir Community Iii; 4 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated November 6, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Substantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

4 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not provide adequate supervision resulting in residents wandering away from facility
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Natasha Persaud conducted an unannounced visit to commence a complaint investigation. LPA identified herself and was allowed entry into the facility by Staff, Conchita Gallardo. LPA discussed the allegation mentioned above wtih staff present. Administrator, Faria Huq and Licensee, Rana Huq arrived during the visit. During today's visit, LPA briefly toured the facility, reviewed records, interviewed staff, and residents. It was alleged staff did not provide adequate supervision resulting in a resident wandering away from facility. It was reported Resident #1 (R1) wandered away from the facility on 10/29/25. R1's Physician's Report dated 05/08/2023 indicated R1 was ambulatory, and had a diagnosis of a Major Neurocognitive disorder. It also indicated R1 was unable to leave the facility unassisted. On 10/29/25, R1 wandered out the front door and entered the neighbor's house requesting police assistance. Staff interviewed stated one caregiver was assisting aCDSS inspection report, November 6, 2025 · control 08-AS-20251029134201
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedAbsence of supervision at night Staff are leaving residents in soiled diapers for extended periods of time Licensee did not provide the required quantity or quality of food to meet the needs of the residents Licensee is charging for fees not outlined in admission agreement
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
LPM II Donna Teutschel conducted a telephone conference with Licensee/Administrator, Rana Huq. A review was conducted of the allegations listed and investigative details available.to date. Facility has night time sleep staff but residents have a call button system that will alert staff if they need assistance. If staff are alerted by a resident to have diaper changed staff respond. No evidence was provided regarding leaving residents in soiled diapers for extended period of time or that food quality was not acceptable. The service fee invoiced for cable was a one-time fee and that was performed by the licensee in procurring a cable box and hooking the cable up to the residents room, cable box and television which was verbally agreed to. The Department is unable to prove or disprove the allegations and the findings are determined to be Unsubstantiated. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, June 30, 2025 · control 08-AS-20210506084436
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewed-Staff refused to assist resident with transfer -Staff required resident to wear diaper -Staff did not ensure resident was hydrated -Staff did not seek medical attention for resident timely
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
LPM II Donna Teutschel conducted a telephone conference with Licensee/Administrator, Rana Huq. A review was conducted of the allegations listed and investigative details available.to date. The Department is unable to prove or disprove the allegations and the findings are determined to be Unsubstantiated. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, June 30, 2025 · control 08-AS-20230228093653

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLicensee did not treat pest
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Natasha Persaud conducted an unannounced visit to conclude the complaint investigation regarding the above-mentioned allegation. LPA met with Staff, Conchita Gallardo. During the investigation, the facility was toured, records reviewed, and interviews conducted with staff, residents, and outside sources. It was alleged the licensee did not treat pest. It was reported a cockroach was observed in Resident #1’s (R1) cup and around the room approximately two (2) to three (3) months ago. It was also reported the roach was observed two (2) weeks ago. Conflicting statements were made. Staff interviews revealed they have not observed any pest or roaches. However, they are taking precautionary measure by spraying inside and outside of the facility once a week. Outside sources revealed the roach was observed but it was only one (1) time a few months ago and there have not been any other observations of pest or roaches. Resident interviews confirmed there were noCDSS inspection report, May 17, 2024 · control 08-AS-20240506103142

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 11 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds), computed across all 5,773 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
1
typical for this size: 0
Type B citations
0
typical for this size: 0
Substantiated complaints
1
typical for this size: 0
Total complaints
4
typical for this size: 0
State visits on file
11
typical for this size: 6
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(858) 414-5095
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Nir Community Iii? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.