Casa De Castro Ii is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in San Diego, San Diego County, California — state license #374600980, licensed for 6 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 9 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated September 26, 2025 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

6 homes in view

Casa De Castro Ii

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Small home, 6 residents · San Diego, CA · San Diego County
LicensedWheelchairMemory careHospice not on fileBedridden not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #374600980, held since 2000 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
7766 Prairie Mound Way · San Diego, San Diego County
Phone
(619) 475-7525
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryVerified in record
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careNot on file — ask the home
Bedridden careNot on file — ask the home

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
FACILITY SERVES SIX (6) ELDERLY RESIDENTS AGES 60 YEARS AND ABOVE, ALLOF WHOM MAY BE NON-AMBULATORY. FACILITY HAS DEMENTIA WAIVER.State service designation935 - ELDERLYthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 9 times and filed 9 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated September 26, 2025.

Most recent state visit
April 28, 2026
Occupancy at the October 2, 2024 visit
6 of 6 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 4 documents with transcribed findings, dated March 3, 2022 to October 2, 2024. 4 of the 4 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Unfounded” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (3). 4 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 4 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 4 of 9 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20251 state visit · 1 document
Sep 26, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20243 state visits · 3 documents
Oct 2, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Licensee did not give resident medication as prescribed

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Marisela Garcia-Centeno conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver investigative findings. LPA was greeted by Caregiver, Melanie Supnet to whom she explained the reason for the visit and delivered findings. The Department investigated the above-listed complaint allegations. The investigation consisted of observations, a review of relevant records, and interviews with facility staff and outside sources. On September 13, 2024, Community Care Licensing (CCL) received a complaint alleging that the licensee did not give resident (R1) medication as prescribed [a LIC811 Confidential Name List was provided to staff to identify R1]. It was specifically alleged that a “nurse” (Note: the facility did not employ nursing staff and the identity of the individual was not disclosed during the investigation) who worked at the facility administered the Seroquel medication four (4) times a day instead of the prescribed dose of 2x per day during August 2024. (Contithe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 2, 2024 · control 08-AS-20240913084352
Sep 23, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 19, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident's toileting needs are not being met

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rebecca Ruiz conducted an unannounced complaint visit to conduct follow up and deliver findings regarding the above mentioned allegation. LPA was greeted by, identified herself to, and explained the purpose of the visit with Caregiver Emelita Supnet. Administrator Celeste Castro and Licensee Cheryl Castro arrived during the visit. During today’s visit, LPA briefly toured the facility, observed residents in care, reviewed and obtained copies of facility records, and interviewed staff. LPA was away from the facility for approximately one hour between 12:15pm and 1:15pm. The Department’s investigation consisted of interviews with staff and outside sources, records review, and a virtual and physical tour of the facility. It was alleged that in 2020, residents’ toileting needs were not being met. Continued on LIC9099-C page... Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 19, 2024 · control 08-AS-20201203113659
Beside homes the same size
Type A citations0typical 0
Type B citations0typical 0
Substantiated complaints0typical 0
Total complaints4typical 0
State visits on file9typical 6
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 5,773 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2000.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20251102024330202312020222202021110
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — San Diego County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (619) 475-7525

Is Casa De Castro Ii licensed?

Yes — Casa De Castro Ii is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in San Diego (San Diego County): California license #374600980, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 6 residents. State records list 9 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated September 26, 2025, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Casa De Castro Ii care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Casa De Castro Ii with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory and dementia / memory care; it does not list hospice care and bedridden. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordFACILITY SERVES SIX (6) ELDERLY RESIDENTS AGES 60 YEARS AND ABOVE, ALLOF WHOM MAY BE NON-AMBULATORY. FACILITY HAS DEMENTIA WAIVER.

How much does Casa De Castro Ii cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Casa De Castro Ii's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in San Diego County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Casa De Castro Ii accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Casa De Castro Ii is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

6 of 6 beds occupied (100%) when the state visited on October 2, 2024. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Casa De Castro Ii?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 9 state visits and 9 dated documents since 2021 for Casa De Castro Ii; 4 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated October 2, 2024, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

4 transcribed reports on file

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLicensee did not give resident medication as prescribed
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Marisela Garcia-Centeno conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver investigative findings. LPA was greeted by Caregiver, Melanie Supnet to whom she explained the reason for the visit and delivered findings. The Department investigated the above-listed complaint allegations. The investigation consisted of observations, a review of relevant records, and interviews with facility staff and outside sources. On September 13, 2024, Community Care Licensing (CCL) received a complaint alleging that the licensee did not give resident (R1) medication as prescribed [a LIC811 Confidential Name List was provided to staff to identify R1]. It was specifically alleged that a “nurse” (Note: the facility did not employ nursing staff and the identity of the individual was not disclosed during the investigation) who worked at the facility administered the Seroquel medication four (4) times a day instead of the prescribed dose of 2x per day during August 2024. (ContiCDSS inspection report, October 2, 2024 · control 08-AS-20240913084352
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident's toileting needs are not being met
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rebecca Ruiz conducted an unannounced complaint visit to conduct follow up and deliver findings regarding the above mentioned allegation. LPA was greeted by, identified herself to, and explained the purpose of the visit with Caregiver Emelita Supnet. Administrator Celeste Castro and Licensee Cheryl Castro arrived during the visit. During today’s visit, LPA briefly toured the facility, observed residents in care, reviewed and obtained copies of facility records, and interviewed staff. LPA was away from the facility for approximately one hour between 12:15pm and 1:15pm. The Department’s investigation consisted of interviews with staff and outside sources, records review, and a virtual and physical tour of the facility. It was alleged that in 2020, residents’ toileting needs were not being met. Continued on LIC9099-C page... UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, April 19, 2024 · control 08-AS-20201203113659

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedLicensee did not provide a safe environment for resident in care.
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Dawn Segura conducted an unannounced visit to conclude a complaint investigation and deliver investigative finding in response to the above-listed allegation. LPA identified herself, was granted entry, and stated the purpose of the visit to Emelita Supnet, staff. Cheryl Castro, Licensee, was contacted via telephone. Community Care Licensing (CCL) has investigated the above listed complaint allegation. The investigation consisted of a tour of the facility and interviews with facility staff and outside source. It was alleged that a safe environment was not provided to a resident in care when Resident 1 (R1) engaged in a behavioral disturbance in the home, during which R1 attempted to enter another resident’s bedroom, threatened, and attempted to attack the resident. Interviews conducted during the investigation confirmed that R1 had a behavioral episode in the early morning hours on March 29, 2023. Interviews further revealed UnfoundedCDSS inspection report, April 28, 2023 · control 08-AS-20230403142252

2022

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff did not dispose of rodent
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Marisela Garcia-Centeno, conducted an unannounced visit to initiate a complaint investigation regarding the above-mentioned allegation. LPA identified herself and was granted entry by Caregiver, Emelita Supnet. LPA stated the purpose of the visit and reviewed the basic elements of the complaint with Administrator, Celeste Castro. During the visit, LPA Garcia-Centeno conducted a tour of inside and outside of the facility with Caregiver, Supnet. LPA interviewed staff and briefly interacted with residents in care. Based on observations and interviews with staff and outside sources, the allegation was determined to be unsubstantiated as the preponderance evidence standard was not met. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report along with Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 01/16) was provided to Administrator, Castro, via email. An electronic email receipt confirms the documents were received. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, March 3, 2022 · control 08-AS-20220228112059

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 9 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds), computed across all 5,773 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing. No substantiated complaints are on file.

Type A citations
0
typical for this size: 0
Type B citations
0
typical for this size: 0
Substantiated complaints
0
typical for this size: 0
Total complaints
4
typical for this size: 0
State visits on file
9
typical for this size: 6
See the full inspection record on the state's site →

Who runs Casa De Castro Ii?

From the CDSS ownership record, checked August 9, 2026.

Licensed to Cheryl Montemayor Castro, who operates 2 licensed California homes in total. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.

Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(619) 475-7525
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Casa De Castro Ii? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.