Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Casa De Castro III

Small home·Licensed for 6·San Diego, California

Licensed since 2025Licence #374604839
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchairState licensing record · September 27, 2026
  • Estimated starting rate$4,100 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $3,350–$5,050
  • Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit5 of 6 beds occupiedSeptember 5, 2025 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitAugust 12, 2026CDSS inspection record
  • Licence holderCheryl Montemayor CastroSince 2025 · 2 licensed homes

Casa De Castro III is a small care home in San Diego — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents since 2025. Dementia care, hospice care and bedridden care are not on file.

Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Casa De Castro III

Is Casa De Castro III licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

How many residents is Casa De Castro III licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Has Casa De Castro III been cited?

0 Type A and 1 Type B citation since 2025, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 6 state visits over the same years.

Is Casa De Castro III still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Casa De Castro III cost?

$4,100 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,350–$5,050. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 10 small homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 49 other homes of a similar licensed size in San Diego that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,950 to $6,000 a month, and the middle figure is $5,000 (n = 49 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Casa De Castro III take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Cheryl Montemayor Castro, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. See the homes licensed to Cheryl Montemayor Castro — at least 2 on the state roster.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Paradise Valley Hospital is 2.7 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Casa De Castro III keep a resident on hospice?

Not on file — the state’s record does not list hospice care on this license. Ask: “Can a resident stay here on hospice, and under what conditions?”

Casa De Castro III license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “CASA DE CASTRO III”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #374604839. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed to Cheryl Montemayor Castro, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2025, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 6 state inspection visits since 2025, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 1 Type B citation on file since 2025, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 6 state visits in that period.
  • 1 complaint and 1 substantiated allegation on file since 2025, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is August 12, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 6 residents
  • Dementia / memory careNot on file · ask the home
  • Hospice careNot on file · ask the home
  • BedriddenNot on file · ask the home

State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 6 NON-AMBULATORY.

935 - ELDERLY

CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026

As needs change

5 questions to ask the home — nothing on file yet
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver not on file

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation not on file

    Ask: “If memory loss develops, what would change — and when would a move be needed?”

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$4,100a month to start

Likely $3,350–$5,050

From 10 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$4,100a month

Likely $3,350–$5,250

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room

Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.

  • Starting monthly rate$4,100likely $3,350–$5,050

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 10 small homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $3,350–$5,250
$4,100
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $3,950–$8,400
$6,100
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 10 small homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

10 homes like this within 3 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,450–$4,950.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 10 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 319 S Siena St, San Diego, CA 92114Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2024, the state has filed 6 documents for this home, and its records count 6 visits since 2025. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated February 19, 2026.

On file since
2024
State visits
6
Most recent visit
August 12, 2026
Occupied · September 5, 2025 visit
5 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 1 complaint report the state published for this home, dated September 5, 2025. 1 of the 1 carries the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (1). 1 includes the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 1 complaint report below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations0typical 0
  • Type B citations1typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations1typical 0
  • Total complaints1typical 0

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2025.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202611020253412024110

The last 36 months — 6 of 6 documents

20261 state visit · 1 document
Feb 19, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jose De La Cruz made an unannounced visit to conduct a Required Annual Inspection. The facility file was reviewed prior to the visit. LPA was welcomed by, identified himself to, and discussed the purpose of the visit with Caretaker (S1). LPA arrived at 8:30 AM, and requested staff and residents records. At 10:35 AM, LPA and S1 toured the facility’s interior and exterior, and inspected each residents’ rooms, one staff room, as well as two bathrooms and garage. The facility was clean, sanitary, and in good repair. Pathways were free of obstruction and slip hazards. Client bedrooms contained the required furnishings and were personalized by the clients. Doors, windows, screens, toilet, and shower were in working order. Extra linen and hygiene supplies were present, as well as Personal Protective Equipment. The facility had sufficient space and equipment to facilitate dining, laundry, visitation, meetings, and client activities. The facility contained at least 2 days of perishable food, and at least 7 days of non-perishable food, all safely stored. Cooking, dining equipment, and utensils were present. Toxic chemicals, poisons were locked in a cabinet, however, the same cabinet has a different unlocked door which makes it accessible to clients. A drawer containing two small 8 inches knives was found. LPA measured the water temperature in two bathrooms and the kitchen sink in Fahrenheit degrees: B1 105, B2, 108.3 kitchen 108. {CONTINUED ON LIC809-C] [CONTINUED FROM LIC809} Medications were labeled, as required, and stored in locked areas. No bodies of water on the premises, one fireplace was on the premises with a door that made it inaccessible to clients. Per S1, no firearms or ammunition are kept at the facility. Carbon monoxide detectors, emergency lighting, and facility telephone were all in working order. Fire extinguishers were serviced within the last 12 months. First aid kits were complete and readily accessible. Required licensing postings were observed in visible areas of the facility. LPA interviewed a client, and reviewed facility records. The files reviewed by LPA were complete. Confidential records were stored in locked areas. One deficiency weas cited per California Code of Regulations. No civil penalties were assessed. An exit interview was conducted with Caretaker, to whom a copy of this report, and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided during today’s visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 19, 2026

The state marks this report as 6 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 4. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

20253 state visits · 4 documents
Sep 19, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: POC

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Carmen Lopez conducted an unannounced case management visit to amend a Plan of Correction and conduct a health and safety check for the residents on care. Additionally, LPA took this opportunity to review the clearance documents submitted to LPA and attempt clear deficiencies. LPA Lopez identified herself and was allowed entry by caregiver, Elizabeth “Beth” Lim. LPA discussed the purpose of the visit with caregiver Lim, and met with Licensee Cheryl Castro, who later arrived and joined the visit. On 09/05/24, the facility was issued 5 deficiencies regarding the medication being provided, insufficient personnel, two residents' Personal Rights, and personal accommodations. During the visit of 09/05/25, two deficiencies were cleared, one for personal rights and the second for personal accommodation deficiencies. During today’s visit, LPA amended the plan of corrections (POC) reports, LIC809-D pages, to update the accurate deficiency types. Additionally, on 09/17/2025, LPA received an email indicating that the Licensee spoke with staff regarding implementation of the MAR system, personnel requirements, personal rights to make choices of their daily lives, managing incontinence, and personal accommodations and services. LPA reviewed the POC with licensee Cheryl Castro and established that the POCs needed additional information and not merely a training document. Licensee did not agree with the jointly developed POC, but said they will be clearing the staffing schedule and the MAR POC's and submit information to LPA. The licensee also acknowledged that they have spoken with the residents regarding the same information but did not have the residents sign the form at the time. During the today's visit, the licensee requested for the residents sign the document submitted to LPA on 09/17/25. Those residents who were present, 4 residents, acknowledged and complied. The last resident was no longer living at the facility. (Continuation on LIC809-C) (Continuation of LIC809-C) As such, one deficiency was corrected and is deemed cleared. The additional two deficiencies are pending and will be sent to LPA via email per the licensee. Lastly, during the visit on 09/05/25, the facility received a POC for complaint investigation 08-AS-20250827145528, for dignity. LPA received the documentation via email on 09/17/2025. During today’s visit, LPA cleared this deficiency. No deficiencies were observed or cited during today's visit. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report along with Licensee Rights (LIC 9058 03/22) were provided to Licensee Cheryl Castro at the conclusion of the visit. The signature below confirms receipt of these documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 19, 2025
Sep 5, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: - Facility staff do not treat residents with dignity

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Carmen Lopez conducted an unannounced complaint visit to open a complaint investigation. While at the facility, LPA investigated and delivered findings regarding the above-mentioned allegation. LPA identified herself and was granted entry by Elizabeth Lim, caregiver. LPA stated the purpose of the visit and reviewed the findings of the complaint with Licensee Cheryl Castro, who later arrived and joined the visit. The Department’s investigation consisted of interviews with staff and residents, and records review of relevant documents pertinent to this investigation. On August 27, 2025, it was said that the facility staff do not treat residents with dignity. It was specifically said that staff #1 (S1) and staff #2 (S2) verbally mistreated a resident in a different language due to R1’s incontinence issues by yelling, screaming and being disrespectful to R1. (Continuationo on LIC9099-C) Substantiated (Continuation of LIC9099) During the investigation, LPA spoke with staff and residents who confirmed that there has been yelling occurring at the facility. According to residents (R1, R2, and R5), S1 has yelled at resident(s). According to R4, they have not heard yelling but acknowledged that S1 is always rushed and in a hurry. According to staff, they confirmed that they do yell in a different language but towards each other, S1 and S2, and not to residents. S1 said that they only spoke with R3 regarding their incontinence and not to defecate on their bed. Resident records show that R1, R2, R4, and R5’s mental conditions are good, and they are able to follow instructions and communicate their needs and are not confused or disoriented. LPA’s observations of the residents were coherent and sound of mind. They all spoke clearly during their interviews. Based on the Department’s investigation of the above-mentioned allegation and the evidence obtained during staff and resident interviews, records reviewed, and LPA observations, there is sufficient evidence to meet the preponderance of evidence standard. Therefore, the above allegation is deemed to be substantiated. California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8, is being cited on the attached LIC9099-D page of this report. The report was discussed, plan of correction was jointly developed, and an exit interview was conducted with Licensee Cheryl Castro. A copy of this report along with Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 3/22) were provided to Licensee Castro at the conclusion of the visit. The signature below confirms the receipt of these documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 5, 2025 · control 08-AS-20250827145528

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87468.2(a)(8) · Plan of correction due date: Sep 19, 2025

87468.2 (a)(8) Additional Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities: (8) To be free from neglect, financial exploitation, involuntary seclusion, punishment, humiliation, intimidation, and verbal, mental, physical, or sexual abuse.… this requirement was not met as evidence by: Based on interviews, staff yelled while working at the facility which affected 5 of 5 resident in care which posed a potential personal rights risk to 5 of 5 residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 5, 2025

Plan of correction: Licensee agreed to speak with the staff and document it and send the document to LPA by POC due date, 09/19/2025.

Sep 5, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Carmen Lopez conducted an unannounced visit to conduct an investigation and in conjunction, conducted this case management visit due to deficiencies found during the investigation. LPA identified herself and was granted entry by Elizabeth Lim, caregiver. LPA stated the purpose of the visit and reviewed the basic elements of this visit with Licensee Cheryl Castro. During the Department’s investigation of complaint control # 08-AS-20250827145528, there were additional discrepancies found, which are being addressed during today’s visit. During the investigation, which consisted of interviews with staff, and residents, and records review of relevant documents, the investigation uncovered that the facility was not providing medication as prescribed, there is insufficient staff to meet the resident’s needs, residents are unable to leave their bedrooms after 6:00 PM, a resident who needed incontinence assistance was malodorous, and resident had dirty bedsheets. During today’s visit, LPA spoke with the residents (R2, R4, and R5), and staff #1 (S1) and staff #2 (S2) who confirmed that caregivers send residents to their room at 6:00 PM after their shift to rest for the night. According to interviews with residents and staff, S1 and S2 are the only caregivers who work at this facility and also reside at the facility. After review of records, it showed that S1 works at the facility from 6:00 AM – 12:00 PM and S2 works from 12:00 PM – 6:00 PM, which leaves the NOC shift unavailable. According to S1 and S2, they care for the resident after their shift if they require assistance throughout the night. Residents interviewed said they were not allowed out of their rooms after 6:00 PM but may yell for staff if they need assistance. During an interview of R3, LPA observed the resident to be malodorous of urine. LPA observed that the resident’s bedsheets were stained of dried fecal matter. (Continuation on LIC809-C) (Continuation of LIC809) According to staff, R3, had to be changed throughout the night because they had gone “poo poo.” While LPA spoke with the Licensee, they observed that the Medication Administration Records (MARs) had been compiled inside manila envelopes and LPA inquired how the staff are aware that they provide the medications to the residents. According to the Licensee, they write the medication timing on top of the bottle – either AM or PM or both. That is how staff know when the residents are to take the medications. LPA further inquired if they used the MARs and Licensee said no. LPA asked if bubble packs would be easier for staff and Licensee said that it would be more difficult for staff as there are too many packs to keep track of. LPA asked if they could demonstrate with one residents’ medication. When LPA opened two medications for R1 they found that medications were missing. There were two pill medications from one bottle missing and 5 pill medications from another bottle missing for R1 which LPA explained to the Licensee and counted in front of them. Based on the information obtained during the investigation, there are deficiencies observed and being cited during this visit and may be found on the LIC809-D page of this report . The report was discussed, a plan of correction was jointly developed, and an exit interview was conducted with licensee Cheryl Castro. A copy of this report, along with Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 3/22) were provided to licensee Castro at the conclusion of the visit. The signature below confirms the receipt of these documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 5, 2025

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87465(c)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Sep 19, 2025

87465 (c)(2) Incidental Medical and Dental Care: (2) Once ordered by the physician the medication is given according to the physician's directions..… this requirement was not met as evidence by: Based on observation, staff did not provide medications as prescribed for R1, [1 of 5] residents in care which posed a potential health risk to 1 of 5 residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 5, 2025

Plan of correction: Licensee will be implementing the MAR system on a regular baisis and will send the updates to LPA via email by POC due date, 09/19/2025. This is an amended version to an original report delivered on 9/5/2025.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR87411(a) · Plan of correction due date: Sep 19, 2025

87411 (a) Personnel Requirements - General: (a) Facility personnel shall at all times be sufficient in numbers, and competent to provide the services necessary to meet resident needs.… this requirement was not met as evidence by: Based on interviews, staff covered 2 shifts at the facility but the third shift was not being scheduled to be covered which posed a potential potential safety risk to 5 of 5 residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 5, 2025

Plan of correction: Licensee agreed to give an additional 2 hours to each caregiver for a total of 4 hours and provide LPA documentation by POC due date, 09/19/2025. This is an amended version to an original report delivered on 9/5/2025.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87468.2(a)(6) · Plan of correction due date: Sep 19, 2025

87468.2 (a)(6) Additional Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities: (6) To make choices concerning their daily lives in the facility.… this requirement was not met as evidence by: Based on interviews with staff and residents, it was confirmed that residents are being sent to their rooms by 6:00 PM for 5 of 5 resident in care which posed a potential personal rights risk to 5 of 5 residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 5, 2025

Plan of correction: Licensee agreed to speak with residents and inform them that they will be able to leave their rooms after 6PM and document and submit their documentation to LPA by POC due date. This is an amended version to an original report delivered on 9/5/2025.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR87625(b)(3) · Plan of correction due date: Sep 5, 2025

87625 (b)(3) Managed Incontinence: (3) Ensuring that incontinent residents are kept clean and dry, and that the facility remains free of odors from incontinence.… this requirement was not met as evidence by: Based on LPA observations and interviews, resident R3 was malodorous (of urine) during their interview, which posed a potential personal rights risk to 1 of 5 residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 5, 2025

Plan of correction: Licensee had staff change R3 during the visit. This citation is deemed cleared during the visit. Licensee agreed to have R3 checked at least 5 times and changed as needed. Licensee will email LPA of the updates. This is an amended version to an original report delivered on 9/5/2025.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87307(a)(3)(C) · Plan of correction due date: Sep 5, 2025

87307 (a)(3)(C) Personal Accommodations and Services: (C) Clean linen, including blankets, bedspreads, top bed sheets, bottom bed sheets, pillow cases, mattress pads, bath towels, hand towels and wash cloths. The quantity shall be sufficient to permit changing at least once per week or more often when indicated to ensure that clean linen is in use by residents at all times. The linen shall be in good repair. The use of common wash cloths and towels shall be prohibited..… this requirement was not met as evidence by: Based on LPA observations, residents bedspread had fecal matter on top of R3s bed which posed a potential health risk to 1 of 5 residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 5, 2025

Plan of correction: Licensee had staff change the linens during LPA's visit. This citation was deemed cleared during the visit. This is an amended version to an original report delivered on 9/5/2025.

Jan 14, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Prelicensing

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Liliana Silveira conducted an announced Pre-Licensing visit to observe the facility’s physical plant for compliance with Title 22, Division 6 of the California Code of Regulations and California Health & Safety Code. LPA was greeted by, identified herself to, and explained the purpose of the visit with Licensee Cheryl Castro and Administrator Celeste Castro. The facility fire clearance was granted on 08/26/24 and reflected that the facility was approved for six (6) non-ambulatory residents, 60 years or age or older. The facility's fire clearance did not include delayed-egress door or secured perimeter endorsements, and neither were present during today's visit. The submitted facility sketch was consistent with the current layout of the facility. During today’s visit, LPA, accompanied by Cheryl and Celeste, toured the interior and exterior of the facility and inspected each room. The facility was clean, sanitary, and in good repair. Pathways were well lit and free of obstruction and slip hazards. Resident bedrooms allowed for easy passage and contained the required furnishings. Toilets, sinks, and showers were in working order. The facility’s ambient internal temperature was compliant at 68 degrees F. Hot water temperature at taps accessible to residents were also compliant: Kitchen sink was 117.5 F, Bathroom #1 sink was 117.6 F, and Bathroom #2 sink was 117.4 F. The facility has enough linens, hygiene supplies, cooking and dining supplies, and food for future resident use. All kitchen appliances were in working order. The facility has sufficient space and equipment to facilitate laundry, visitation, meetings, and resident activities. The facility has locked areas for storage of sharp objects, medication, and confidential resident and staff records. (CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE, LIC 809-C) (CONTINUED FROM FIRST PAGE, LIC 809) No pools or bodies of water were observed on the premises. There were no toxic chemicals/poisons, fireplaces, or open-faced heaters accessible to residents. Per Administrator, no firearms or ammunition are or will be stored at the facility. Smoke alarms, carbon monoxide detectors, emergency lighting, and facility telephone were all operational. All fire extinguisher(s) were serviced within the last twelve months. A complete first aid kit was present. Required licensing postings were observed in visible areas of the facility. LPA also presented and discussed the Component III Training during today’s visit. The items reviewed were complaint with Title 22, Division 6 of the California Code of Regulations and California Health & Safety Code. The applicant passed the pre-licensing inspection. Cheryl and Celeste were advised that the facility’s application is pending management final review and approval. An exit interview was conducted with the Cheryl and Celeste, to whom a copy of this report and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided. Signature below confirms receipt of the documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 14, 2025
20241 state visit · 1 document
Dec 19, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Office

Facility Type: RCFE Application Type: Initial Capacity: 6 Interview Method: Telephone interview On 12/19/2024, applicant/administrator participated in COMP II. Identification of the applicant and administrator was verified through interview questions based on photo ID and other identifying personal information. During COMP II, applicant and administrator confirmed that they have read and understand community care facility licensing laws included in the Health and Safety Codes and the California Code of Regulations Title 22. Signed LIC 809 with copy of photo ID have been obtained. During COMP II, CAB analyst confirmed Applicant/Administrator’s understanding of following areas: 1. Facility operation: License type, client/resident populations, and program 2. Admission Policies 3. Staffing requirements & Training 4. Restrictive/Prohibited Health Conditions 5. General provisions 6. Emergency Preparedness 7. Complaints & Reporting 8. Pre-licensing readinessthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 19, 2024
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Who holds the licence

Cheryl Montemayor Castro, licensed since 2025, operates 2 licensed homes in California. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in San Diego County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore San Diego County