Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

P & P Homes

Small home·Licensed for 6·San Diego, California

Licensed since 2017Licence #374603761
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Dementia · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · September 27, 2026
  • Estimated starting rate$4,650 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $3,800–$5,700
  • Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit5 of 6 beds occupiedMay 20, 2025 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitMay 8, 2026CDSS inspection record
  • Licence holderP & P Homes Inc.Since 2017 · 2 licensed homes

P & P Homes is a small care home in San Diego — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents since 2017.

Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about P & P Homes

Is P & P Homes licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

How many residents is P & P Homes licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Has P & P Homes been cited?

0 Type A and 1 Type B citation since 2017, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 9 state visits over the same years.

Is P & P Homes still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does P & P Homes cost?

$4,650 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,800–$5,700. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 16 small homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 49 other homes of a similar licensed size in San Diego that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,950 to $6,000 a month, and the middle figure is $5,000 (n = 49 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does P & P Homes take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by P & P Homes Inc., per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. See the homes licensed to P & P Homes Inc. — at least 2 on the state roster.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Paradise Valley Hospital is 3.5 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can P & P Homes keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 2 residents, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

P & P Homes license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “P & P HOMES INC”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #374603761. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed to P & P Homes Inc., per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2017, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 9 state inspection visits since 2017, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 1 Type B citation on file since 2017, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 9 state visits in that period.
  • 2 complaints and 1 substantiated allegation on file since 2017, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is May 8, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 6 residents
  • Dementia / memory careApproved by the state
  • Hospice careApproved · covers up to 2 residents
  • BedriddenApproved · covers up to 6 residents

State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 6 NON-AMBULATORY OF WHICH 6 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 2.

983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA

CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 2 — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation on file

    Ask: “Can we read the dementia care disclosure and discuss how daily support works?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

3 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$4,650a month to start

Likely $3,800–$5,700

From 16 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$4,650a month

Likely $3,800–$5,900

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room
  • Starting monthly rate$4,650likely $3,800–$5,700

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 16 small homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $3,800–$5,900
$4,650
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,450–$9,000
$6,650
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 16 small homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

16 homes like this within 5 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,750–$5,000.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 16 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 146 Wedgewood Drive, San Diego, CA 92114Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2021, the state has filed 9 documents for this home, and its records count 9 visits since 2017. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated May 8, 2026.

On file since
2021
State visits
9
Most recent visit
May 8, 2026
Occupied · May 20, 2025 visit
5 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 2 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated December 16, 2021 to May 20, 2025. 2 of the 2 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (1). 2 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 2 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations0typical 0
  • Type B citations1typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations1typical 0
  • Total complaints2typical 0

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2017.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202611020251302024110202311020222202021111

The last 36 months — 5 of 9 documents

20261 state visit · 1 document
May 8, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Carmen Lopez conducted an unannounced required Annual Inspection. The facility file was reviewed prior to the visit. LPA identified herself and was granted entry by caregiver Maria Cruz. LPA discussed the purpose of the visit with lead caregiver Jonathan Luciano and Licensee Paulo Ordinanza, who later arrived and joined the visit. According to the facility’s license, there may be a maximum of 6 residents, all of whom may be non-ambulatory of which 6 may be bedridden at any given time at the facility site. The facility is approved for 2 hospice residents. During today’s inspection, the facility’s current census is 6 residents living at the facility. There were 5 residents present at the facility site during the inspection. LPA inspected the interior and exterior of the facility and inspected each room. The facility was clean, sanitary, and in good repair. Pathways were free of obstruction and slip hazards. Client bedrooms contained the required furnishings. Doors, windows, toilets, and showers were clean and in working order. The facility maintained extra linens and hygiene supplies. Personal Protective Equipment was complete and maintained in an accessible area. The facility had sufficient space and equipment to facilitate dining, laundry, visitation, meetings, and activities. The facility’s ambient internal temperature was comfortable and compliant, at 76.6ºF. Hot water temperature at taps accessible to residents was compliant and maintained within the allotted temperature ranges as stipulated by regulations. [CONTINUED ON LIC 809-C] [CONTINUED FROM LIC 809] There were at least 2 days of perishable food, and at least 7 days of non-perishable food present. The facility-maintained cooking, dining equipment, and utensils are all safely stored. There were no toxic chemicals or poisons accessible to residents. Medications were properly labeled, as required, and stored in a locked cabinet, which LPA inspected. The facility-maintained medication logs, which LPA reviewed. There were no pools or bodies of water on the premises. Per licensee Ordinanza, no firearms or ammunition are kept at the facility. Carbon monoxide detectors, emergency lighting, and the facility telephone were all in working order. Fire extinguisher was present (01) and serviced within the last 12 months. The first aid kit was complete and readily accessible. LPA reviewed staff and resident records. LPA’s visit did not raise any licensing concerns. The files that LPA reviewed contained the required documents. Confidential records were stored in a locked area. Required licensing postings were observed in a visible area of the facility. There were no deficiencies observed or cited during today's annual inspection. An exit interview was conducted with Licensee Paulo Ordinanza and lead caregiver Jonathan Luciano, to whom a copy of this report, along with the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22), were provided at the conclusion of the visit. The signature below confirms that the documents were received. The Licensee had submitted an updated Emergency Disaster Plan (LIC610-E) to the Department. During the visit LPA received a current Designation of Administrative Responsibility (LIC 308), and Personnel Report (LIC 500).the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 8, 2026
20251 state visit · 3 documents
May 20, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: - Staff financially abusing residents in care

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Carmen Lopez conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver complaint investigation findings. LPA identified herself and was granted entry by Jonathan Luciano, caregiver. LPA stated the purpose of the visit and reviewed the findings of the complaint with Licensee Paulo Ordinanza who later arrived and joined the visit. The Department’s investigation consisted of interviews with staff, residents, and outside sources and a records review of relevant documents pertinent to this investigation. On December 6, 2024, it was alleged that the facility staff financially abused residents in care. It was alleged staff #1 (S1) and staff #2 (S2) were misappropriating the funds for resident #1 (R1) and resident #2 (R2) through withdrawal transactions. According to an Outside Source (OS1), R1 and R2 were taken to their respective banking institution on 11/14/2024, where their funds were deposited. Shortly thereafter, there was a withdrawal with an additional charge to R1's account. (Continuation on LIC9099-C) Unsubstantiated (Continuation of LIC9099) During the same visit, R2 modified their debit card information. S1 was present and instructed both R1 and R2 on the response to the financial institution staff. After the visit, interviews and bank surveillance revealed that S1 and S2 made withdrawals totaling $5,300, between November 2024 through January 2025, which was unusual account activity compared to the resident’s account history. The Department reviewed facility records which included admission agreements, physician’s reports, and Individual Service Plans (IPP) for both R1 and R2. Based on record review, R1 and R2 were not able to manage their own cash resources due to underlying cognitive medical conditions. The Department interviewed S1 who reported that the cash was withdrawn to purchase items for R1. R2 receives supplemental income through a third-party source. It was noted that R2 owed the facility funds for rent. According to financial statements, admission agreement and baking records, R2 lived at the facility since February 2023, but they did not receive their supplementary income until October 2024, after which the facility collected R2's supplementary income to satisfy invoices for past rent owed until November 2024. Facility invoices were inspected which revealed three separate payments for R1’s “SSI portion” in the amount of $1,398.07 on 11/19/25, 11/27/25, and 12/7/25. Three additional payments were recorded in the amount of $1,420.07 on 1/6/25, 2/6/25, and 3/6/25, which indicated that the amounts of the withdrawals did not exceed the amount R2 owed for November 2024 to January 2025. Based on the Department’s investigation of the above-mentioned allegation and the evidence obtained during staff and outside source interviews, and records reviewed, there is insufficient evidence to meet the preponderance of evidence standard. Therefore, the above allegation is deemed to be unsubstantiated. The report was discussed, and an exit interview was conducted with Licensee Paulo Ordinanza. A copy of this report along with Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 3/22) were provided to Licensee Ordinanza at the conclusion of the visit. The signature below confirms the receipt of these documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 20, 2025 · control 08-AS-20241206160415
May 20, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Carmen Lopez conducted an unannounced required Annual Inspection. The facility file was reviewed prior to the visit. LPA Lopez identified herself, was granted entry by caregiver Jonathan Luciano. LPA discussed the purpose of the visit with caregiver Luciano. Licensee Paulo Ordinanza later arrived and joined the visit. According to the facility’s license, there may be a maximum of six (6) residents all of whom may be non-ambulatory of which 6 may be bedridden in at any given time at the facility site. The facility is approved for 2 hospice residents. During today’s inspection, the facility’s current census is five (5) residents living at the facility. There were 4 residents present at the facility site during the inspection. LPA, accompanied by caregiver Luciano, toured the interior and exterior of the facility, and inspected each room. The facility was in clean, sanitary and in good repair. Pathways were free of obstruction and slip hazards. Resident bedrooms contained the required furnishings. Doors, windows, toilets, and showers were in working order. Extra linens and hygiene supplies were present, as well as Personal Protective Equipment. The facility had sufficient space and equipment to facilitate dining, laundry, visitation, meetings, and activities. The facility’s ambient internal temperature was comfortable and compliant, at 72.1 degrees Fahrenheit (F). Hot water temperature at taps accessible to clients were also compliant: kitchen sink measured hot water at 108.5 degrees F; sink in restroom #1 delivered hot water at 113.4 degrees F; and sink in restroom #2 delivered hot water at 109.8 degrees F. [CONTINUED ON LIC 809-C] [CONTINUED FROM LIC 809] There was at least 2 days of perishable food, and at least 7 days non-perishable food present. Cooking, dining equipment and utensils were present, and all safely stored. There were no toxic chemicals or poisons accessible to residents. Medications were properly labeled, as required, and stored in locked cabinet that LPA inspected. The facility-maintained medication logs which LPA reviewed. No pools or bodies of water on the premises. Per licensee, no firearms or ammunition are kept at the facility. Carbon monoxide detectors, emergency lighting, and facility telephone were all working. Fire extinguisher was present (01) and serviced within the last 12 months. First aid kits were completed and readily accessible. LPA spoke with staff and residents, and reviewed staff and resident records. During today’s visit there were 4 residents on the facility premise. LPA conversations did not raise any licensing concerns. The files which LPA reviewed contained required documents. Confidential records were stored in a locked area. Required licensing postings were observed in a visible area of the facility. There were deficiencies observed and cited and a technical advisory provided to the facility during today's annual inspection and can be found on the LIC809-D and LIC9102TA page of this report. An exit interview was conducted with Licensee Paulo Ordinanza to whom a copy of this report along with the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided at the conclusion of the visit. The signature below confirms the documents were received. LPA requested Licensee Ordinanza to submit a current copy of their Designation of Administrative Responsibility LIC 308, Personnel Report LIC 500, and Emergency Disaster Plan LIC 610-E, to the licensing office within 10 business days. Forms are available at www.ccld.ca.gov. LPA also requested to have their Plan of Operation updated and submitted to the licensing office.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 20, 2025

The state marks this report as 5 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 4. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

May 20, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Carmen Lopez conducted an unannounced visit to deliver complaint findings and in conjunction conducted this case management visit. LPA Lopez identified herself and was granted entry by caregiver Jonathan Luciano. LPA Lopez stated the purpose and reviewed basic elements of the case management visit with licensee Paulo Ordinanza who later arrived to join the visit. The Department reviewed facility records, which included admission agreements, Physician’s Report’s, and Individual Service Plans (IPP) for Resident #1 (R1) and Resident #2 (R2). Based on records review, R1 and R2 were not able to manage their own cash resources due to underlying cognitive medical conditions. According to R2’s admission agreement, they were responsible for partial payment toward their rent which was to be paid from their SSI funds. The Department obtained financial statements and bank surveillance from 11/2024 through 01/2025 which indicated that withdrawals were made for R1 and R2 with the assistance of Staff #1 (S1) and Staff #2 (S2). The Department interviewed S1 who reported that $171.86 cash was withdrawn to purchase items for R1. On 04/08/2025, the Department requested receipts from S1 for the items purchased for R1, however they were unable to provide receipts after searching for the documents. Facility invoices were subsequently inspected for R2 which revealed that three separate payments for R2’s “SSI portion” were made to the facility in the amount of $1,398.07 on 11/19/25, 11/27/25, and 12/7/25. Three additional payments were recorded in the amount of $1,420.07 on 1/6/25, 2/6/25, and 3/6/25. The Department inspected the facility’s Record of Client’s/Resident’s Safeguarded Cash Resources (LIC405) for R1 and R2 dated 2/22/23 – 11/9/2024 which revealed that entries were not made for the aforementioned expenditures. (Continuation on LIC809-C) (Continuation of LIC809) There were deficiencies cited during today’s visit and may be found on the LIC809-D page of this report. An exit interview, and a plan of correction was jointly developed, with licensee Paulo Ordinanza. A copy of this report, along with the Licensee Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided to licensee Ordinanza at the conclusion of the visit. The signature below confirms the documents were received.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 20, 2025

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87217(a)(1)(A) · Plan of correction due date: Jun 20, 2025

87217 Safeguards for Residents Cash, Personal Property, and Valueables: (A) An acceptable receipt where cash is provided to residents from their respective accounts, includes: the resident's signature or mark, or responsible party's full signature, and a statement acknowledging receipt of the amount and date received. An acceptable form of receipt would include:... this requirement was not met as evidence by: Based on records review the facility's documents for R1 and R2 did not have 2 of 5 updated cash resources form for residents which posed potential personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 20, 2025

Plan of correction: The Licensee agreed to repay and deposit the amount of $171.86 to to R1's respective banking institution and document it on their P&I Funds form.

20241 state visit · 1 document
Apr 18, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Carmen Lopez conducted an unannounced required Annual Inspection. The facility file was reviewed prior to the visit. LPA Lopez identified herself, was granted entry by caregivers Editha Cuizon and Jonathan Luciano. LPA discussed the purpose of the visit with Licensee Precy Ordinanza-Hulburd. Administrator Paulo Ordinanza later arrived and joined the visit. According to the facility’s license, there may be a maximum of six (6) residents all of whom may be non-ambulatory of which 6 may be bedridden; and hospice waiver is approved for 2, in at any given time at the facility site. During today’s inspection, the facility’s current census is 5 residents living at the facility. There were 5 residents present at the facility site during the inspection. LPA, accompanied by Licensee Ordinanza-Hulburd and Administrator Ordinanza, toured the interior and exterior of the facility, and inspected each room. The facility was clean, sanitary and in good repair. Pathways were free of obstruction and slip hazards. Client bedrooms contained the required furnishings. Doors, windows, toilets, and showers were in working order. Extra linens and hygiene supplies were present, as well as Personal Protective Equipment. The facility had sufficient space and equipment to facilitate dining, laundry, visitation, meetings, and activities. The facility’s ambient internal temperature was comfortable and compliant, at 70.7 degrees Fahrenheit (F). Hot water temperature at taps accessible to residents were also compliant: kitchen sink was delivered hot water at 112.8 degrees F; sink in restroom #1 delivered hot water at 109.4 degrees F; and sink in restroom #2 delivered hot water at 109.4 degrees F. [CONTINUED ON LIC 809-C] [CONTINUED FROM LIC 809] There was at least 2 days of perishable food, and at least 7 days non-perishable food present. Cooking/dining equipment and utensils were present, and all safely stored. There were no toxic chemicals/poisons accessible to residents. Medications were properly labeled, as required, and stored in a locked area. LPA inspected the office area where the medication cabinet was located and found that medications were properly labeled and stored in a locked cabinet. The facility-maintained medication logs which LPA reviewed. No pools or bodies of water on the premises. Per Administrator Ordinanza, no firearms or ammunition are kept at the facility. Carbon monoxide detectors, emergency lighting, and facility telephone were all working. Fire extinguisher(s) were present (01) and serviced within the last 12 months. First aid kit(s) were complete and readily accessible. LPA interviewed staff and resident, and reviewed staff and resident records. During today’s visit there were 5 residents on the facility premise. LPA interviews did not raise any licensing concerns. The files which LPA reviewed contained required documents. Confidential records were stored in a locked area. Required licensing postings were observed in a visible area of the facility. There were no deficiencies observed or cited during today's annual inspection. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator Paulo Ordinanza and Licensee Precy Ordinanza-Hulburd to whom a copy of this report along with the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided at the conclusion of the visit. The signature below confirms the documents were received. LPA requested Administrator Paulo Ordinanza to submit a current Designation of Administrative Responsibility LIC 308, and Personnel Report LIC 500, to the licensing office within 10 business days. Forms are available at www.ccld.ca.gov. The facility provided an updated copy of the Emergency Disaster Plan LIC 610-E to LPA during the inspection.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 18, 2024
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Who holds the licence

P & P Homes Inc., licensed since 2017, operates 2 licensed homes in California. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in San Diego County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore San Diego County