Silvergate San Marcos Retirement Residence is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in San Marcos, San Diego County, California — state license #374600026, licensed for 160 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 13 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated May 28, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

2 homes in view

Silvergate San Marcos Retirement Residence

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 160 residents · San Marcos, CA · San Diego County
LicensedWheelchairHospiceBedriddenMemory care not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #374600026, held since 1994 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
1550/1560 Security Place · San Marcos, San Diego County
Phone
(760) 744-4484
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 160 residents
Dementia / memory careNot on file — ask the home
Hospice careVerified in record
Bedridden careVerified in record

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
FACILITY SERVES 160 NON-AMBULATORY ELDERLY RESIDENTS; AGE 60 AND ABOVE. 12 OF WHOM MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE CARE WAIVER APPROVED FOR 21. APPROVED DELAYED EGRESS AT BUILDING 1560.State service designation985 - RCFE / HOSPICEthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 14 times and filed 13 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated May 28, 2026.

Most recent state visit
May 28, 2026
Occupancy at the April 15, 2026 visit
48 of 160 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 6 documents with transcribed findings, dated September 30, 2022 to April 15, 2026. 6 of the 6 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Unsubstantiated” (6). 6 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 6 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 9 of 13 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20263 state visits · 3 documents
May 28, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 15, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff member who is not an appropriately skilled professional removed a fecal impaction from a resident.

On April 15, 2026, the California Department of Social Services/Community Care Licensing (CDSS/CCL) Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Antonine Richard, conducted an unannounced follow-up complaint visit. The LPA met with the Administrator (A1), Joan Rink Carroll, and explained that the purpose of the visit was to correct the wording of the allegation on LIC9099, as stated in LIC802. The investigation consisted of collecting records and observing the facility. On April 7, 2026, the Department obtained various documents, including the Personnel Report LIC 500 (dated 04/07/26), the Resident Roster (dated 04/07/26), the Registered Nursing License dated September 30, 2025, and the Living Nurse Certificates dated June 30, 2026. The department interviewed Administrator A1, an RN, a Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN), and six residents (R1-R6). Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 15, 2026 · control 18-AS-20230413163957
Apr 7, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff member who is not an approprieately skilled professional removed a fescal impication from a resident.

On April 7, 2026, the California Department of Social Services/Community Care Licensing (CDSS/CCL) Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Antonine Richard conducted an unannounced follow-up complaint visit. The LPA met with the Administrator (A1), Joan Rink Carrol, and Bardiago Evelina, Registered Nurse (RN). And explained the purpose of the visit was to investigate the allegation mentioned above. The investigation consisted of collecting records and observing the facility. The Department obtained various documents, including the Personnel Report LIC 500 (dated 04/07/26), the Resident Roster (dated 04/07/26), the Registered Nursing License dated September 30, 2025, and the Living Nurse Certificates dated June 30, 2026. The department interviewed Administrator A1, an RN, a Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN), and six residents (R1-R6). Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 7, 2026 · control 18-AS-20230413163957
20246 state visits · 6 documents
Aug 22, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 21, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 14, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident's money was stolen while in care.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Debbie Correia conducted a follow up visit to conclude a complaint investigation. The LPA identified herself and was greeted by Front Desk Receptionist Daisy Olvera and met with DRC Navarette and disclosed the purpose of the visit. The Department’s investigation consisted of facility and resident record reviews, interviews conducted with staff, residents and an outside source. It was alleged that Resident's 1 (R1’s) money was stolen while in care. A resident records review revealed R1 was admitted to the facility on August 10, 2019. Further review of R1’s facility records revealed the facility only covered theft or loss of personal belongings up to $200 and encouraged residents to seek personal insurance for any items that exceeded the property value covered by the facility. Resident records also revealed R1 declined to provide the facility with a list of their personal belongings. Interviews conducted with the Administrator and Staff 1 (S1) revealed R1the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 14, 2024 · control 08-AS-20201204154620
May 8, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 29, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 25, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations0typical 1
Type B citations0typical 1
Substantiated complaints0typical 2
Total complaints5typical 7
State visits on file14typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 1994.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated2026330202466020223402021110
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — San Diego County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?
How are care plans reviewed when a resident’s needs change?

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (760) 744-4484

Is Silvergate San Marcos Retirement Residence licensed?

Yes — Silvergate San Marcos Retirement Residence is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in San Marcos (San Diego County): California license #374600026, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 160 residents. State records list 13 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated May 28, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Silvergate San Marcos Retirement Residence care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Silvergate San Marcos Retirement Residence with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, hospice care, and bedridden; it does not list dementia / memory care. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordFACILITY SERVES 160 NON-AMBULATORY ELDERLY RESIDENTS; AGE 60 AND ABOVE. 12 OF WHOM MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE CARE WAIVER APPROVED FOR 21. APPROVED DELAYED EGRESS AT BUILDING 1560.

How much does Silvergate San Marcos Retirement Residence cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Silvergate San Marcos Retirement Residence's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in San Diego County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Silvergate San Marcos Retirement Residence accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Silvergate San Marcos Retirement Residence is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

48 of 160 beds occupied (30%) when the state visited on April 15, 2026. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Silvergate San Marcos Retirement Residence?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 14 state visits and 13 dated documents since 2021 for Silvergate San Marcos Retirement Residence; 6 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated April 15, 2026, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

6 transcribed reports on file

2026

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff member who is not an appropriately skilled professional removed a fecal impaction from a resident.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On April 15, 2026, the California Department of Social Services/Community Care Licensing (CDSS/CCL) Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Antonine Richard, conducted an unannounced follow-up complaint visit. The LPA met with the Administrator (A1), Joan Rink Carroll, and explained that the purpose of the visit was to correct the wording of the allegation on LIC9099, as stated in LIC802. The investigation consisted of collecting records and observing the facility. On April 7, 2026, the Department obtained various documents, including the Personnel Report LIC 500 (dated 04/07/26), the Resident Roster (dated 04/07/26), the Registered Nursing License dated September 30, 2025, and the Living Nurse Certificates dated June 30, 2026. The department interviewed Administrator A1, an RN, a Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN), and six residents (R1-R6). UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, April 15, 2026 · control 18-AS-20230413163957
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff member who is not an approprieately skilled professional removed a fescal impication from a resident.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On April 7, 2026, the California Department of Social Services/Community Care Licensing (CDSS/CCL) Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Antonine Richard conducted an unannounced follow-up complaint visit. The LPA met with the Administrator (A1), Joan Rink Carrol, and Bardiago Evelina, Registered Nurse (RN). And explained the purpose of the visit was to investigate the allegation mentioned above. The investigation consisted of collecting records and observing the facility. The Department obtained various documents, including the Personnel Report LIC 500 (dated 04/07/26), the Resident Roster (dated 04/07/26), the Registered Nursing License dated September 30, 2025, and the Living Nurse Certificates dated June 30, 2026. The department interviewed Administrator A1, an RN, a Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN), and six residents (R1-R6). UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, April 7, 2026 · control 18-AS-20230413163957

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident's money was stolen while in care.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Debbie Correia conducted a follow up visit to conclude a complaint investigation. The LPA identified herself and was greeted by Front Desk Receptionist Daisy Olvera and met with DRC Navarette and disclosed the purpose of the visit. The Department’s investigation consisted of facility and resident record reviews, interviews conducted with staff, residents and an outside source. It was alleged that Resident's 1 (R1’s) money was stolen while in care. A resident records review revealed R1 was admitted to the facility on August 10, 2019. Further review of R1’s facility records revealed the facility only covered theft or loss of personal belongings up to $200 and encouraged residents to seek personal insurance for any items that exceeded the property value covered by the facility. Resident records also revealed R1 declined to provide the facility with a list of their personal belongings. Interviews conducted with the Administrator and Staff 1 (S1) revealed R1CDSS inspection report, August 14, 2024 · control 08-AS-20201204154620

2022

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff financially abused resident.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Liliana Silveira conducted a complaint investigation visit to deliver findings for the above-mentioned allegations. LPA Silveira met with Executive Director Joan Rink-Carroll and shared the findings. The Department’s investigation consisted of interviews and records review. On 10/05/21, it was alleged that staff financially abused a resident. Resident #1 (R1) reported money missing from their room. A records review and an interview with the Executive Director revealed that an internal investigation was conducted, and the incident was reported to the local Sheriff’s Department as required. The facility’s internal investigation consisted of staff and resident interviews, as well as a review of internal records. The investigation findings revealed that there were no witnesses and residents could not identify a suspected abuser. The review of internal records revealed inconsistencies with the documentation of staff access to room keys and staff presence in rCDSS inspection report, October 28, 2022 · control 08-AS-20211005102024
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewed-Facility is not servicing the elevator to maintain it operable. -Residents are served cold meals. -Facility does not have planned activities for residents.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Liliana Silveira conducted a complaint investigation visit to deliver findings for the above-mentioned allegations. LPA Silveira met with Executive Director Joan Rink-Carroll and shared the findings. The Department’s investigation consisted of interviews, observations, and records review. On 08/31/2021, it was alleged that the facility was not servicing the elevator to maintain it operable. Between 08/23/21 to 08/28/21, and again on 08/31/21, the elevator was inoperable due to servicing. Records review demonstrated that the facility had a contract with an elevator servicing company and made plans with the company to fix the elevator issues. Interviews with staff, residents and outside sources revealed that staff was hired to fix the elevator. Records review and interviews with staff also demonstrated that the elevator was fixed and the facility made reasonable accommodations for residents to mitigate the impact. (continued on LIC 9099C) UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, September 30, 2022 · control 08-AS-20210831094514
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewed- Facility did not assist resident with arrangement of transportation services. - Facility did not follow Admission Agreement.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Liliana Silveira conducted a complaint investigation visit to deliver findings for the above-mentioned allegations. LPA Silveira met with Executive Director Joan Rink-Carroll and shared the findings. The Department’s investigation consisted of interviews, observations, and records review. On 10/06/2021, it was alleged that the facility did not assist a resident with the arrangement of transportation services. Interviews with staff, residents and outside sources revealed that while changes were made to the transportation schedule effective 10/01/21, the facility continued to facilitate transportation services for the resident in question. Interviews also revealed that assistance with coordinating trips continued to be provided by facility staff. A review of records also demonstrated that transportation services were facilitated by the facility for the resident during this time. (continued on LIC 9099-C) UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, September 30, 2022 · control 08-AS-20211006113833

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 14 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing. No substantiated complaints are on file.

Type A citations
0
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
0
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
0
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
5
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
14
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(760) 744-4484
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Silvergate San Marcos Retirement Residence? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.