Small home · Licensed for 6 · San Diego
Carpel Board and Care Facility
2073 Hanford Drive, San Diego, CA 92111Licensed since 1985
Overview
No openings reported
- Approved by the state: Wheelchair · HospiceState licensing record · October 26, 2026
- Licensed for 6: a small care homeThe state license record
Ask this home
Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.
Care and support
- Wheelchairup to 6 residents
- Hospiceup to 2 residents
Not on file: dementia and bedridden approvals.
Approved by the state · State licensing record · October 26, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.
Read the state’s own wording
FACILITY SERVES ELDERLY CLIENTS AGE 60 AND ABOVE, ALL OF WHOM MAY BE NON-AMBULATORY. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR TWO (2) RESIDENTS GRANTED.
935 - ELDERLY
CDSS record, verbatim · October 26, 2026
As needs change
Staying through hospice
Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 2 — care may continue at the end of life
State licensing record · October 26, 2026
We’ll ask for you. Not on file for Carpel Board and Care Facility: two-person transfers or a lift, who is awake overnight, help with medicines and care if memory loss develops. When we check availability, we ask about these too.
Check availabilityWhat it costs here
Covelight estimate
$3,900a month to start
Likely $3,200–$4,850
From 15 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file
Monthly cost breakdownWith a shared room and basic help · room, care and fees$3,900likely a month
Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.
Starting monthly rate$3,900likely $3,200–$4,850
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 15 small homes and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600
Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (44 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).
One-time move-in fee$2,500one time · likely $0–$4,000
Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,500 (133 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.
- Likely monthly totalLikely $3,200–$5,050
- $3,900
- First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $3,800–$8,300
- $6,400
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
- MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
- Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
- Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
- SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
- VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
- Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
Rates at nearby homes15 nearby homes publish starting rates of $2,000 to $10,000
15 homes like this within 5 miles publish starting rates mostly between $2,900–$6,400.
- Mission Carehome NorthSan Diego · 0.8 mi · Small home$3,800Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Mission Carehome SouthSan Diego · 0.8 mi · Small home$3,800Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Gold Canyon Care HomeSan Diego · 1.0 mi · Small home$3,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Mission Villa WestSan Diego · 1.8 mi · Small home$4,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Mission Villa EastSan Diego · 1.8 mi · Small home$4,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Emerald Guest HomeSan Diego · 1.8 mi · Small home$2,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Canyon Guest HomeSan Diego · 3.1 mi · Small home$7,200Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Right Choice Senior Living ClairemontSan Diego · 3.3 mi · Small home$6,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Harborview Senior Assisted LivingSan Diego · 3.6 mi · Mid-size home$6,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Twain Residential CareSan Diego · 4.0 mi · Mid-size home$4,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Thrive Elder CareSan Diego · 4.0 mi · Small home$6,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Clairemont Guest HomeSan Diego · 4.1 mi · Small home$6,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Sea Breeze Senior LivingLa Jolla · 4.7 mi · Small home$10,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- La Jolla Casa FiestaLa Jolla · 4.7 mi · Small home$8,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Butterfly Gardens IILa Jolla · 4.8 mi · Small home$5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 15 small homes and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
- Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
- Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
- Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
- Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
- We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
- It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
- The care level
Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.
- What is billed separately
Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.
- Move-in costs
A one-time move-in fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.
- Increases
California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.
An estimate for planning, not a quote. A home sets the price after hearing about the care needed.
Daily life
Daily life here is not on file yet. Most small homes haven’t published it, and that says nothing about the home.
The best way to see it is a visit.
Request a tourWhere it is
2073 Hanford Drive, San Diego, CA 92111Address from the public record · October 26, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.
Opening the neighborhood map…
- Sharp Mary Birch Hospital for Women and NewbornsHospital · General acute care, on the state’s list1.2 mi
Straight-line distances; check the drive or the walk. Hospital: the nearest general acute care hospital on the state’s list (CDPH, September 16, 2026).
Open directionsThe state record
California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
CDSS public record, read October 26, 2026 · License #372004242 · See the state’s own record
The last 36 months — 7 of 8 documents
Complaint outcomes in these 36 months, in the state’s words: 1 “Substantiated” and 1 “Unsubstantiated”.
20263 state visits · 3 documents
May 15, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff handled a resident roughly, resulting in injury to the resident.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Janet Ngallo conducted an unannounced subsequent visit to deliver findings regarding the above-mentioned allegation. LPA identified themselves and met with Licensee Leonor Carmona to discuss the purpose of the visit and elements of the complaint. On 04/02/2026, it was alleged that staff handled a resident roughly, resulting in injury. The department's investigation consisted of interviews and records review. Regarding the allegation, staff consistently reported that the resident(R1) exhibited ongoing combative behaviors, including hitting, spitting, swinging limbs, throwing objects, attempting to leave the facility, and resisting care. Staff stated that when assistance was required for changing or redirection, multiple staff occasionally provided support due to R1's strength and resistance but denied using rough handling. Staff reported no injuries observed on R1. (Cont. on LIC 9099-C) Unsubstantiated (Cont. from LIC 9099) An interview with an outside source (OS1) reported that R1 had a history of making claims that others are “hurting” or “pushing” them when resisting care or direction, including in situations involving OS1 and family members. OS1 further reported that during visits at the hospital after R1's admission, they did not observe any bruising or marks on R1's body. OS1 stated they did not believe facility staff caused harm and described staff interactions observed as consistent with efforts to assist a resident who was rejecting care. Records reviewed indicated that the resident was admitted with diagnoses including dementia and psychotic disturbance and required some assistance with ADLs and mobility. Facility notes documented episodes of restlessness, combative behaviors, and refusal of redirection in the days leading up to hospitalization. No care plan, physician’s report, or MAR could be reviewed; the licensee was cited in a separate visit for incomplete recordkeeping. Based on interviews and records review, the preponderance of evidence standard has not been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted with Licensee Leonor Carmona and a copy of this report, along with Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC 9058 01/16), were provided. Their signature confirms receipts of these documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 15, 2026 · control 08-AS-20260402085610
Apr 3, 2026Facility evaluation reportCase Management - DeficienciesDeficiency page: Type B
Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Janet Ngallo conducted a Case Management - Deficiencies visit. LPA was greeted and allowed entry into the facility by Staff, Soledad Suba. Licensee Leonor Carmona joined the visit shortly after. Today, LPA was at the facility regarding a complaint investigation and observed a deficiency. LPA requested resident records for Resident #1 (R1) and was made aware by the licensee that the files were incomplete. The licensee stated that the resident was admitted to the facility without the required documentation. The licensee did not obtain a medical assessment, pre-admission appraisal, resident appraisal, functional capabilities, mental condition, or social factors assessment for R1. LPA explained the importance on required documentation for admittance. One deficiency was observed and cited on the attached LIC 809D. A plan of correction was jointly developed with the licensee. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report along with Licensee Rights (LIC 9058 03/22) were provided to Licensee Leonor Carmona whose signature below confirms receipt of these rights.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 3, 2026
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87506(a) · Plan of correction due date: May 1, 2026
(a)The licensee shall ensure that a separate, complete, and current record is maintained for each resident in the facility or in a central administrative location readily available to facility staff and to licensing agency staff. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews and record review, the licensee did not maintain records for R1, a former resident, which poses a potential health, safety and personal rights risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 3, 2026
Plan of correction: Due to R1 no longer being a resident, the licensee agreed to attend training on resident records and provide proof of training with training topic clearly noted and signatures of attendees by POC due date.
Feb 11, 2026Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff inappropriately restrained resident.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Janet Ngallo conducted an unannounced visit to initiate a complaint investigation and deliver findings regarding the above mentioned allegation. LPA identified themselves and met with Licensee Leonor Carmona to discuss the purpose of the visit and elements of the complaint. On 02/06/2026, it was alleged that staff inappropriately restrained a resident. The department's investigation consisted of interviews, records review, and observations. (Cont. on LIC 9099-C) Substantiated (Cont. from LIC 9099) Interviews with staff corroborated the allegation. By admission, staff reported that a fabric tie was used to secure Resident 1 (R1) in a wheelchair to prevent them from falling forward. Staff reported that the resident was unable to release the tie independently. Staff stated that the restraint was applied periodically when the resident was seated in the wheelchair and staff were not present to monitor R1 in the living room area. Staff confirmed that the restraint was removed after being advised by a social worker that its use was not permitted. LPA reviewed R1’s physician report and hospice records. No physician order was found authorizing the use of any postural support for R1. Hospice records revealed that R1 is bed-bound and wheelchair bound, requires one person assistance for transfers, and has upper extremity stiffness. Hospice documentation also noted that caregivers are to receive instruction on fall precautions and safe use of assistive devices. LPA observed the fabric tie used to secure R1, observed as a scarf-like cloth. Staff demonstrated how the tie was applied around the resident’s lower torso to hold R1's posture in the wheelchair. LPA observed R1 in bed, clean, well-groomed and asleep. Staff showed LPA the wheelchair used by R1 but did not apply the restraint to R1 for demonstration during the visit due to R1 being asleep. Based on observations, interviews and records review, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be substantiated. California code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6 & Chapter 8 is being cited on the attached LIC 9099D. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report along with Licensee Rights (LIC 9058 03/22) were provided to Licensee Leonor Carmona, whose signature below confirms receipt of these rights.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 11, 2026 · control 08-AS-20260206143548
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87608(a) · Plan of correction due date: Mar 6, 2026
(a)Based on the individual's preadmission appraisal… Postural supports may be used under the following conditions. This requirement was not met, as evidenced by: Based on observations, records review and interviews, licensee did not follow postural support conditions for One(1) out of (Four)4 residents. This posed a potential health and personal rights risks to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 11, 2026
Plan of correction: The Licensee will conduct in-service postural support training with all facility staff and provide a sign-in sheet with signatures and training topic clearly noted to LPA via email by 03/06/2026.
20253 state visits · 3 documents
Dec 8, 2025Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Janet Ngallo conducted an unannounced Required Annual Inspection. The facility file was reviewed prior to the visit. LPA was welcomed by, identified herself to, and discussed the purpose of the visit with Adminstrator Leonor Carmona. According to the facility’s license, the facility has a maximum capacity of six (6) residents, all of whom may be non-ambulatory. Hospice waiver for two(2) residents granted. LPA Ngallo, toured the interior and exterior of the facility, and inspected each room. The facility was clean, sanitary, and in good repair. Pathways were free of obstruction and slip hazards. Residents bedrooms contained the required furnishings. Doors, windows, toilets, and showers were in working order. Extra linens and hygiene supplies were present. The facility had sufficient space and equipment to facilitate dining, laundry, visitation, meetings, and residents activities. Hot water temperatures were compliant at 112 F in all bathrooms used by residents. There was at least 2 days of perishable food, and at least 7 days non-perishable food present, all safely stored. Cooking/dining equipment and utensils were present. There were no toxic chemicals/poisons accessible to residents. Medications were labeled, as required, and stored in locked areas. (Cont. LIC 809-C) No pools or bodies of water on the premises. Per Administrator, no firearms or ammunition are kept at the facility. Carbon monoxide detectors, emergency lighting, and facility telephone were all working. Fire extinguisher(s) were present. First aid kit(s) were complete and readily accessible. Required licensing postings were observed in visible areas of the facility. LPA interviewed staff and reviewed multiple staff and client records/files. LPA interviews did not raise any licensing concerns. The files which LPA reviewed contained required documents. Confidential records were stored in locked areas. No deficiencies were observed or cited during today's annual inspection. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator Leonor Carmona to whom a copy of this report and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided during the visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 8, 2025
Jan 31, 2025Facility evaluation reportCase Management - Annual ContinuationReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Annual Continuation
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Juliana Barfield conducted an unannounced Required Annual Inspection. The facility file was reviewed prior to the visit. LPA was welcomed by, identified herself to, and discussed the purpose of the visit with Licensee Leonor Carmona. According to the facility’s license, the facility has a maximum capacity of 6 residents, of whom all may be non-ambulatory. During today’s inspection, there were a total of five (5) residents in care. This facility does not feature a secured perimeter or delayed egress doors. LPA, accompanied by Leonor Carmona, toured the interior and exterior of the facility. Pathways were free of obstruction and slip hazards. Extra linens and hygiene supplies were present, as well as Personal Protective Equipment. The facility had sufficient space and equipment to facilitate dining, laundry, visitation, meetings, and client activities. Hot water temperature at taps accessible to clients were all compliant. There was at least 2 days supply of perishable food, and at least 7 days non-perishable food present. Cooking/dining equipment and utensils were present. There were no toxic chemicals/poisons, fireplaces, or open-faced heaters observed available to clients. Medications were labeled, as required, and stored in locked areas. No pools or bodies of water were observed on the premises. Per Leonor Carmona, no firearms or ammunition are kept at the facility. Smoke alarms, carbon monoxide detectors, emergency lighting, and facility telephone were all working. Fire extinguisher(s) were serviced within the last 12 months. First aid kit(s) were complete and readily accessible. Required licensing postings were observed in visible areas of the facility. (CONTINUED ON LIC809-C) (CONTINUED FROM LIC809) Confidential records were stored in locked areas. Leonor Carmona also presented current/active business liability insurance. An exit interview was conducted with Leonor Carmona, and a copy of this report and Licensee Rights (LIC 9058 01/16) were provided to Leonor Carmona.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 31, 2025
Jan 8, 2025Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Juliana Barfield conducted an unannounced visit for a Required Annual Inspection. The facility file was reviewed prior to the visit. LPA was welcomed by, identified herself to, and discussed the purpose of the visit with Licensee Leonor Carmona. During today’s visit, LPA toured the facility and interviewed clients. No deficiencies were cited during today’s visit. Due to time constraints, a return visit on a subsequent day is needed to complete the annual inspection. An exit interview was conducted with Leonor Carmona, and a copy of this report and Licensee Rights (LIC 9058 01/16) were provided to Leonor Carmona.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 8, 2025
20241 state visit · 1 document
Jan 9, 2024Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
On 1/9/2024, at about 12:10 PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Daniel Pena conducted an unannounced Required Annual Inspection. LPA was welcomed by, identified himself to, and discussed the purpose of the visit with Leonor Carmona, Administrator. According to the facility’s license, the facility serves six (6) elderly residents, age 60 and above, all of whom may be non-ambulatory. Hospice waiver for two (2) residents granted. During the inspection, LPA toured the interior and exterior of the facility and observed each resident’s room. The facility was organized, kempt and in good repair. Pathways inside the property were free of obstruction and slip hazards. Resident bedrooms contained the required furnishings. Doors, windows, toilets, and showers were in working order. Extra linens and hygiene supplies were present, as well as Personal Protective Equipment. The facility had sufficient space and equipment to facilitate dining, laundry, visitation, meetings, and resident activities. There was at least two days of perishable food, and at least seven days non-perishable food present, all safely stored. Cooking/dining equipment and utensils were present. Medications were labeled, as required, and stored in locked areas. No pools or bodies of water were observed on the premises. Per Administrator, Carmona, no firearms or ammunition are kept at the facility. Emergency lighting, and facility telephone were all working. Fire extinguisher(s) were present and serviceable. First aid kit(s) was observed. Required licensing postings were observed in visible areas of the facility. Hot water temperatures measured at 112.4 and 112. 6 in sinks accessible to residents. LPA interviewed residents and reviewed staff and resident records/files. LPA interviews did not raise any licensing concerns. The files which LPA reviewed contained required documents. Confidential records were stored in locked areas. Licensee was given Technical Advisories for carbon monoxide and smoke detectors, CPR/First Aid certification and storing cleaning supplies. No deficiencies were cited during today's annual inspection. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator, Carmona to whom a copy of this report and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided during the visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 9, 2024
Earlier years2021 · 1 document
20211 state visit · 1 document
Dec 17, 2021Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rebecca Ruiz conducted an unannounced Required 1 - Year Visit. The facility file was reviewed prior to the visit. LPA was greeted by and allowed entrance into the facility by Caregiver Soledad Suba. LPA identified herself and explained the purpose of the visit to Administrator Leonor Carmona. LPA conducted a tour of the facility and observed the clients in care. In accordance with the Department’s Infection Control, LPA provided technical assistance, observed, and evaluated the facility's implementation of their COVID-19 Mitigation Plan, to include disinfection, testing, vaccination, screening protocols, and the use of personal protective equipment. No deficiencies were cited or observed on this date. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator Leonor Carmona, to whom a copy of this report and the licensee appeal rights (LIC9058 01/16) were provided via E-mail.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 17, 2021
4 of 6 beds were occupied at the May 15, 2026 state visit, the most recent — a count on that day, not an opening.
License holder
Carmona, Leonor Pelayo, licensed since 1985.
Operates 2 licensed homes in California. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.
- Carpel Board & Care Facility #2 · San Diego
The state’s totals for this licenseSince 1985, as the state’s facility page counts them
- State visits on file
- 8
- Total complaints
- 2
- Substantiated allegations
- 1
- Type A citations
- 0
- Type B citations
- 1
These are the state’s own totals for this license since 1985, per CDSS records. The state counts them apart from the documents above, and they can differ from what those documents show; the documents say what each visit found. One complaint can contain several allegations.
Compare with homes the same size
| This home | Typical | |
|---|---|---|
| Type A citations | 0 | 0 |
| Type B citations | 1 | 0 |
| Substantiated allegations | 1 | 0 |
| Total complaints | 2 | 0 |
“Typical” is the statewide median for licensed homes this size. It does not adjust for years licensed, and older licenses have had more visits and reports. The median is across the 6,916 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record. The figures compared are the state’s totals, not the documents.
What the state’s words mean
CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents stand in their place.
Frequently asked questions
A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
Quick answers about Carpel Board and Care Facility
Is Carpel Board and Care Facility licensed?
The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
How many residents is Carpel Board and Care Facility licensed for?
6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Has Carpel Board and Care Facility been cited?
0 Type A and 1 Type B citation since 1985, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. Those records count 8 state visits over the same years.
Is Carpel Board and Care Facility still open?
This license was on the CDSS roster as of November 11, 2026.
What does Carpel Board and Care Facility cost?
$3,900 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,200–$4,850. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 15 small homes and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Among 51 other homes of a similar licensed size in San Diego that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,000 to $6,000 a month, and the middle figure is $5,000 (n = 51 other homes publishing a starting rate).
Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date between September and October 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.
A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.
The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.
A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.
Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
Does Carpel Board and Care Facility take Medi-Cal?
On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Who holds the license?
The license is held by Carmona, Leonor Pelayo, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Is there a hospital nearby?
Sharp Mary Birch Hospital for Women and Newborns is 1.2 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.
Can Carpel Board and Care Facility keep a resident on hospice?
Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 2 residents, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Carpel Board and Care Facility license and inspection record
- Name on the license: “CARPEL BOARD AND CARE FACILITY”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
- License #372004242. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed to Carmona, Leonor Pelayo, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- First licensed in 1985, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 8 state inspection visits since 1985, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 0 Type A and 1 Type B citation on file since 1985, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. The same records count 8 state visits in that period.
- 2 complaints and 1 substantiated allegation on file since 1985, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
- The most recent state visit on file is May 15, 2026, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗
Nearby
Other homes nearby
Licensed homes near this one in San Diego County, most information on file first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$5,200 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,250–$6,450On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Starting rate
$3,800 a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Starting rate
$3,800 a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Starting rate
$3,000 a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$3,950 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,250–$4,850On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,200 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,450–$5,150On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
Street maps © Protomaps · © OpenStreetMap
Explore San Diego County