Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Gold Canyon Care Home

Small home·Licensed for 6·San Diego, California

Licensed since 2013Licence #374603212
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Dementia · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · September 27, 2026
  • Starting rate$3,000 a monthListed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026
  • Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit5 of 6 beds occupiedJune 3, 2026 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitJune 3, 2026CDSS inspection record

Gold Canyon Care Home is a small care home in San Diego — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents since 2013.

Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Gold Canyon Care Home

Is Gold Canyon Care Home licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

How many residents is Gold Canyon Care Home licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Has Gold Canyon Care Home been cited?

0 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2013, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 6 state visits over the same years.

Is Gold Canyon Care Home still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Gold Canyon Care Home cost?

$3,000 a month to start — listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026.

The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living shared bedroom, seen September 9, 2026.

Among 48 other homes of a similar licensed size in San Diego that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,000 to $6,000 a month, and the middle figure is $5,000 (n = 48 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Gold Canyon Care Home take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Stolz, Armin, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Sharp Mary Birch Hospital for Women and Newborns is 1.4 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Gold Canyon Care Home keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 6 residents, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Gold Canyon Care Home license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “GOLD CANYON CARE HOME”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #374603212. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed to Stolz, Armin, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2013, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 6 state inspection visits since 2013, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2013, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 6 state visits in that period.
  • 2 complaints and 0 substantiated allegations on file since 2013, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is June 3, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 5 residents
  • Dementia / memory careApproved by the state
  • Hospice careApproved · covers up to 6 residents
  • BedriddenApproved by the state

State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
FACILITY IS LICENSED FOR ONE (1) BEDRIDDEN RESIDEN TIN ROOM "E" AND FIVE (5) NON-AMBULATORY RESIDENT IN ROOMS "A,B & C",AGES 60 YEARS & ABOVE. FACILITY HAS A HOSPICE WAIVER FOR SIX (6) RESIDENTS WITH TOTAL CARE COMPONENT EFFECTIVE 4/26/13.

983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA

CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 6 — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation on file

    Ask: “Can we read the dementia care disclosure and discuss how daily support works?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

3 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

What it costs here

This home’s starting rate

$3,000a month to start

Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026 · See listing

Likely monthly total

$3,000a month

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · where the price comes from
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room
  • Starting monthly rate$3,000this home

    The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living shared bedroom, seen September 9, 2026.

  • Help with daily careIncludedper the home

    The home lists its rent as all-inclusive on Caring.com, seen September 9, 2026. Ask which care needs would change the monthly rate.

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $3,000
$3,000
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $3,000–$7,000
$5,000

Costs & moving in

  • How care costs are added to the rentAll inclusive

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Lowest monthly rate stated$3,000/moAssisted Living shared bedroom

    Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.

How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWhere this price comes from

The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living shared bedroom, seen September 9, 2026.

17 homes like this within 5 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,800–$7,900.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 17 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 6461 Quillan Street, San Diego, CA 92111Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2022, the state has filed 6 documents for this home, and its records count 6 visits since 2013. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on June 3, 2026 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Unsubstantiated.”

On file since
2022
State visits
6
Most recent visit
June 3, 2026
Occupied at that visit
5 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 2 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated January 30, 2026 to June 3, 2026. 2 of the 2 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Unsubstantiated” (2). 2 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 2 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations0typical 0
  • Type B citations0typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations0typical 0
  • Total complaints2typical 0

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2013.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated2026330202511020241102022110

The last 36 months — 5 of 6 documents

20263 state visits · 3 documents
Jun 3, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Unlawful Eviction.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Janet Ngallo conducted an unannounced visit to initiate a complaint investigation and deliver findings regarding the above mentioned allegation. LPA identified themselves and met with caregiver Mayra Stolz to discuss the purpose of the visit and elements of the complaint. Licensee Armin Stolz joined the visit shortly after. On 05/27/2026, it was alleged that a resident (R1) was unlawfully evicted. The department's investigation consisted of interviews and records review. Regarding the allegation, interviews with an outside source(OS1), reported that on 05/25/2026, R1 had a behavioral episode and the facility called OS1 to notify them, and OS1 was called to pick R1 up. OS1 stated they removed R1 from the facility but did not receive a written eviction notice. [Cont. on LIC 9099-C] Unsubstantiated [Cont. from LIC 9099] Interviews with the facility staff reported that although R1 had a behavioral outburst, the facility did not intend to evict R1 and would have allowed them to return. Staff reported that OS1 asked staff to contact law enforcement regarding the behavior and chose to remove R1 following the incident and moved R1 out the same week. Staff consistently stated the facility did not issue a written eviction notice because there was no intent to evict R1. Staff stated they would have kept R1 and continued with one on one care due to R1's behavioral episode. Records review of R1's medical assessment revealed that R1 was diagnosed with schizoaffective disorder, and can have expressions of frustration, can get aggressive, occasional yelling. Records review of the incident report submitted to the department revealed that on 05/25/2026, R1 had a "melt down" claiming that staff(S2) stole a pillow from them. S2 found the pillow, but R1 still accused S2 of stealing it while yelling racist comments and throwing the contents of the dining table at S2. S2 had a visible contusion where the item that was thrown hit on their body, but S2 refused medical treatment. R1's Power of Attorney(POA) was contacted and requested that law enforcement be contacted. When law enforcement arrived, they recommended R1's POA to remove R1 from the facility. R1's POA moved R1 out of the facility by noon. Based on interviews, records review, the preponderance of evidence standard has not been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted with Licensee Armin Stolz and a copy of this report, along with Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC 9058 01/16), were provided. Their signature confirms receipts of these documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 3, 2026 · control 08-AS-20260527142053
Apr 23, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Janet Ngallo conducted an unannounced Required Annual Inspection. LPA was welcomed by and discussed the purpose of the visit to Armin Stolz, Administrator. The facility's license shows a maximum capacity of six (6) residents of which five (5) can be non-ambulatory and one (1) bedridden, ages 60 and over. The facility has an approved hospice waiver for six (6). During today’s inspection there were five(5) residents in care. LPA and Armin Stolz, Administrator toured the interior and exterior of the facility and inspected each room. The facility was clean, sanitary, and in good repair. Pathways were free of obstruction and slip hazards. Resident bedrooms contained the required furnishings. Doors, windows, screens, toilets, and showers were in working order. Extra linens and hygiene supplies were present, as well as Personal Protective Equipment. The facility had sufficient space and equipment to facilitate dining, laundry, visitation, meetings, and resident activities. The facility contained at least 2 days of perishable food, and at least 7 days non-perishable food, all safely stored. Cooking, dining equipment, and utensils were present. No toxic chemicals or poisons were accessible to residents. Medications were labeled, as required, and stored in locked areas. No pools or bodies of water exist on the premises. Per Armin Stolz, Administrator, no firearms or ammunition are kept at the facility. Carbon monoxide detectors, emergency lighting, and facility telephone were all in working order. First aid kit(s) were complete and readily accessible. Required licensing postings were observed in visible areas of the facility. LPA interviewed staff and residents, and reviewed facility records. S1 was missing an updated first aid/CPR certification, and S2 was missing a health screening/tuberculosis test. (Cont. on LIC 809-C) (Cont. from LIC 809) During today's visit, LPA observed the facility’s fire extinguisher that was not serviced within the last twelve (12) months, as required. Three(3) deficiencies were cited per California Code of Regulations, Title 22. Plans of correction were jointly developed with the licensee. An exit interview was conducted with Armin Stolz, Administrator and a copy of this report and the appeal rights (LIC9058 03/22), and the signature on this form, acknowledges receipt of these rights.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 23, 2026
Jan 30, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff unlawfully evicted a resident.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Janet Ngallo conducted an unannounced subsequent visit to deliver findings regarding the above mentioned allegation. LPA identified themselves and met with Administrator Armin Stolz to discuss the purpose of the visit and elements of the complaint. On 12/15/2025, it was alleged that staff unlawfully evicted Resident 1(R1). The department's investigation consisted of interviews and records review. Interviews and records review revealed that on 12/12/2025, R1 sustained an unwitnessed fall and was transported to the hospital for evaluation and treatment of a head injury. R1 returned to the facility the next morning after being treated. Interviews revealed that staff did not refuse R1's return from the hospital. Staff stated that the hospital attempted to discharge R1 at approximately 3:30 a.m., but the facility does not provide overnight staff, as residents typically sleep through the night and no night watch was required while R1 was hospitalized. Records review revealed that R1 was sent to the hospital with documentation notice advising the hospital not to attempt return of R1 between midnight and 7:00 a.m. (Cont. on LIC 9099-C) Unsubstantiated (Cont. from LIC 9099) Facility policy for overnight care needs, signed by R1, indicated that the facility does not employ an awake caregiver during overnight hours unless required, and R1 did not require such care. An interview with outside source 1 (OS1) confirmed that they picked up R1 from the hospital the next morning and returned R1 to the facility the same day. OS1 stated that the facility did not refuse return of R1. Based on interviews and records review, a preponderance of evidence does not exist to prove that the alleged violation occurred. Therefore, the allegation is determined to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator Armin Stolz, to whom a copy of this report and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC 9058 03/22) were provided and their signature confirms receipt of the report.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 30, 2026 · control 08-AS-20251215100548
20251 state visit · 1 document
Oct 6, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ramin Hashemi conducted an unannounced Required Annual Inspection. The facility file was reviewed prior to the visit. LPA was welcomed by and discussed the purpose of the visit to Armin Stolz, Administrator. The facility's license shows a maximum capacity of six (6) residents of which five (5) can be non-ambulatory and one (1) bedridden, ages 60 and over. The facility has an approved hospice waiver for six (6). During today’s inspection there were 4 residents in care. LPA and Armin Stolz, Administrator toured the interior and exterior of the facility and inspected each room. The facility was clean, sanitary, and in good repair. Pathways were free of obstruction and slip hazards. Client bedrooms contained the required furnishings. Doors, windows, screens, toilets, and showers were in working order. Extra linens and hygiene supplies were present, as well as Personal Protective Equipment. The facility had sufficient space and equipment to facilitate dining, laundry, visitation, meetings, and client activities. The facility contained at least 2 days of perishable food, and at least 7 days non-perishable food, all safely stored. Cooking, dining equipment, and utensils were present. No toxic chemicals or poisons were accessible to clients. Medications were labeled, as required, and stored in locked areas. No pools or bodies of water exist on the premises. Per Armin Stolz, Administrator, no firearms or ammunition are kept at the facility. Carbon monoxide detectors, emergency lighting, and facility telephone were all in working order. Fire extinguisher(s) were serviced within the last 12 months. First aid kit(s) were complete and readily accessible. Required licensing postings were observed in visible areas of the facility. LPA interviewed staff and clients, and reviewed facility records. The files reviewed by LPA contained required documents. Confidential records were stored in locked areas. No deficiencies were cited during the inspection. An exit interview was conducted with Armin Stolz, Administrator to whom a copy of this report and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 6, 2025
20241 state visit · 1 document
Apr 16, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Daniel Pena conducted an unannounced Required 1-Year visit. The facility file was reviewed prior to the visit. LPA was met at the entrance by Myra Stolz, Caregiver. Licensee Armin Stolz arrived and LPA met with Mr. and Ms. Stolz and discussed the purpose of the visit. Per a records check, all staff present possessed a current criminal record clearance and First Aid/CPR certifications. Mr. Stolz is also the Administrator for the facility and resides on site. LPA conducted a tour of the facility, both inside and outside. There were currently two (2) staff members to provide for the residents in care. The facility is operating in accordance with their fire clearance. The smoke and carbon monoxide alarms were present. Stolz stated that there are no firearms stored on the premises. The facility thermostat read at 75 degrees F. Hot water temperature was measured at 113.1 and 112.8 degrees F in the resident bathroom and kitchen. Each toilet and bathtub/shower had grab bars for resident use and each bathtub/shower had nonskid mats or strips. Each resident room had sufficient lighting. The facility exceeded the minimum of one (1) week of nonperishable foods and a minimum of two (2) days of fresh perishable foods. Medications are centrally stored and secured in the kitchen. Facility records were also reviewed. The disaster plan was readily available in the hallway by the kitchen. Staff records were reviewed and indicated current training including, medications and postural supports. Review of Resident records indicate that in each of the files reviewed, there is a current Medical Assessment, and an Admission Agreement. Mr. Stolz also provided the declaration sheet for the facility's current liability insurance. The coverage amounts, meet minimum requirements as required, and expires on 01/01/2025. No deficiencies were cited during today's inspection. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was provided to Mr. Stolz. Mr. Stolz was provided a copy of the appeal rights (LIC9058 01/16), and his signature on this form, acknowledges receipt of these rights.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 16, 2024
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in San Diego County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore San Diego County