Rose Villa is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Grand Terrace, San Bernardino County, California — state license #366425370, licensed for 6 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 17 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2022, the most recent dated May 29, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

4 homes in view

Rose Villa

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Small home, 6 residents · Grand Terrace, CA · San Bernardino County
LicensedWheelchairMemory careHospiceBedridden
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #366425370, held since 2011 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
11906 Kingston Street · Grand Terrace, San Bernardino County
Phone
(909) 825-7673
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 6 residents
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careApproved for 2 residents
Bedridden careApproved for 1 resident

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
SIX (6) NON-AMBULATORY, HOSPICE WAIVER FOR TWO (2), OF WHICH ONE (1) CAN BE BEDRIDDEN.State service designation983 - RCFE / DEMENTIAthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2022, the state has visited this home 22 times and filed 17 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated May 29, 2026.

Most recent state visit
May 29, 2026
Occupancy at the March 26, 2024 visit
6 of 6 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 4 documents with transcribed findings, dated August 23, 2022 to March 26, 2024. 4 of the 4 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (1), “Unfounded” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (2). 4 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 4 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 6 of 17 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20261 state visit · 1 document
May 29, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20251 state visit · 1 document
Aug 15, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20242 state visits · 3 documents
Oct 14, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 26, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident sustained a fracture while in care.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Anna Fannell conducted a subsequent visit to the facility to deliver findings on the above allegation. LPA met with care provider Karina Chaveres who was informed of the reason for today's visit. Chavares notified Licensee Mazoor Massey of LPA's presence and Massey arrived shortly. LPA conducted the initial complaint visit and investigation included interview with relevant parties and review of records. It is alleged that Resident (R1) sustained a fracture while in care. On 1/2/2023, the Department received an incident report of R1 falling at the facility and being sent to a local hospital. The incident report further states that R1 sustained a broken leg and needed surgery. LPA reviewed American Medical Response (emergency services) records and records revealed that R1 leaned against a wall and gradually lowered themself to the ground while facility staff assisted R1 down. Review of LIC603A, Resident Appraisal, shows that R1 is able to walk without anythe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 26, 2024 · control 56-AS-20230103155228
Mar 26, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20231 state visit · 1 document
Aug 22, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations0typical 0
Type B citations1typical 0
Substantiated complaints1typical 0
Total complaints4typical 0
State visits on file22typical 6
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 5,773 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2011.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20261102025110202423020234702022551
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$3,500$5,500 /mo
our estimate — San Bernardino County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (909) 825-7673

Is Rose Villa licensed?

Yes — Rose Villa is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Grand Terrace (San Bernardino County): California license #366425370, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 6 residents. State records list 17 inspection and complaint documents since 2022; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated May 29, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Rose Villa care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Rose Villa with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, hospice care, and bedridden. Clearances describe what the license permits, not day-to-day staffing — confirm current scope and availability with the home directly on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordSIX (6) NON-AMBULATORY, HOSPICE WAIVER FOR TWO (2), OF WHICH ONE (1) CAN BE BEDRIDDEN.

How much does Rose Villa cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Rose Villa's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in San Bernardino County typically runs $3,500–$5,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $3,000–$5,000/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Rose Villa accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Rose Villa is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

6 of 6 beds occupied (100%) when the state visited on March 26, 2024. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Rose Villa?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 22 state visits and 17 dated documents since 2022 for Rose Villa; 4 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated March 26, 2024, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

4 transcribed reports on file

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident sustained a fracture while in care.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Anna Fannell conducted a subsequent visit to the facility to deliver findings on the above allegation. LPA met with care provider Karina Chaveres who was informed of the reason for today's visit. Chavares notified Licensee Mazoor Massey of LPA's presence and Massey arrived shortly. LPA conducted the initial complaint visit and investigation included interview with relevant parties and review of records. It is alleged that Resident (R1) sustained a fracture while in care. On 1/2/2023, the Department received an incident report of R1 falling at the facility and being sent to a local hospital. The incident report further states that R1 sustained a broken leg and needed surgery. LPA reviewed American Medical Response (emergency services) records and records revealed that R1 leaned against a wall and gradually lowered themself to the ground while facility staff assisted R1 down. Review of LIC603A, Resident Appraisal, shows that R1 is able to walk without anyCDSS inspection report, March 26, 2024 · control 56-AS-20230103155228

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedResident was denied visitation. Staff did not communicate with authorized representative about change of resident’s condition.
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Anna Bueno and Michelle Echeverria conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver findings on the above allegations. LPA identified themselves to Regina Albudriz, who was notified of the reason for today’s visit. The investigation included staff, witness, and resident interviews, and records review. Designee Janet Oliver arrived during today's visit and LPA Michelle Echeverria left the facility before the conclusion of today's visit. Allegation 1: Resident was denied visitation. LPA reviewed visitor log that show the facility is open for visits. Interviews with staff reveal that the facility is following strict Covid-19 recommendations related to visitation, specifically for visitors testing positive for Covid-19. Witness interviewed stated that they gave the facility specific instructions regarding limiting visitors for Resident 1 (R1) and staff interviewed confirmed that the facility was following witness instructions. Records reviewed showCDSS inspection report, February 10, 2023 · control 56-AS-20220721160710
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff handled resident roughly Staff did not treat resident with respect Staff mismanaged resident's medication
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Anna Bueno and Michelle Echeverria conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver findings on the above allegations. The investigation consisted of file reviews, interviews with staff and witnesses. Residents 1 and 2 were not able to be interviewed due to their absence. LPAs identified themselves to lead staff Regina Albidriz, who was notified of the reason for today’s visit. Designee Janet Oliver arrived during today's visit and LPA Michelle Echeverria left the facility before the conclusion of today's visit. Allegation 1: Staff handled resident roughly. LPA Bueno interviewed residents who denied that staff have been rough with them . Interviews with visiting third parties confirmed that residents have not mentioned nor complained of staff maltreatment. This allegation is therefore unsubstantiated. Allegation 2: Staff did not treat resident with respect. Interviews with residents did not reveal that staff are disrespectful to residents. StafCDSS inspection report, February 10, 2023 · control 56-AS-20220818142838

2022

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility has pests.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Anna Bueno conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the complaint allegation: Facility has pests. LPA identified herself to staff Gina Albidruz, who was notified of the reason for today’s visit. Staff phoned licensee Manzoor Massey, who arrived shortly. The investigation included inspection of the facility, staff interviews, and review of facility records. LPA Anna Bueno conducted multiple facility visits and observed pests in the kitchen area and in 1 of 5 resident bedrooms. Staff interviews also confirmed that the facility had a pest control treatment days prior to LPA's 6/6/2022 visit. The facility submitted pest treatment and inspection reports from a licensed pest control company prior to the delivery of the complaint finding. Based on the above information th preponderance of the evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. Refer to LIC 9099D for deficiency cited. An exit interview was coCDSS inspection report, August 23, 2022 · control 18-AS-20220126143226

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 22 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds), computed across all 5,773 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
0
typical for this size: 0
Type B citations
1
typical for this size: 0
Substantiated complaints
1
typical for this size: 0
Total complaints
4
typical for this size: 0
State visits on file
22
typical for this size: 6
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(909) 825-7673
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Rose Villa? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.