Mid-size home · Licensed for 18 · Helendale
Loving Care Ranch
25445 National Trail Hwy, Helendale, CA 92342Licensed since 2006
Overview
No openings reported
- Approved by the state: Wheelchair · Dementia · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · October 26, 2026
- Licensed for 18: a mid-size care homeThe state license record
Ask this home
Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.
Care and support
- Wheelchairup to 18 residents
- Dementia
- Hospiceup to 4 residents
- Bedriddenup to 4 residents
Approved by the state · State licensing record · October 26, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.
Read the state’s own wording
18 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 4 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN; HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 4
983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA
CDSS record, verbatim · October 26, 2026
As needs change
Staying through hospice
Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 4 — care may continue at the end of life
State licensing record · October 26, 2026
If memory loss develops
Dementia-care designation on file
State licensing record · October 26, 2026
We’ll ask for you. Not on file for Loving Care Ranch: two-person transfers or a lift, who is awake overnight and help with medicines. When we check availability, we ask about these too.
Check availabilityWhat it costs here
Covelight estimate
$4,150a month to start
Likely $3,300–$5,500
From 14 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file
Monthly cost breakdownWith a shared room and basic help · room, care and fees$4,150likely a month
Starting monthly rate$4,150likely $3,300–$5,500
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 14 homes with 7 to 49 beds and similar homes within 23 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600
Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (44 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).
One-time move-in fee$2,500one time · likely $0–$4,000
Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,500 (133 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.
- Likely monthly totalLikely $3,300–$5,650
- $4,150
- First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,000–$8,800
- $6,650
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
- MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
- Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
- Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
- SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
- VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
- Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
Rates at nearby homes14 nearby homes publish starting rates of $2,800 to $5,500
14 homes like this within 23 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,050–$5,000.
- Arya Senior Care HomeApple Valley · 12 mi · Small home$4,900Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Maemar ManorVictorville · 16 mi · Small home$4,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Della Guest HomeVictorville · 16 mi · Small home$4,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Golden Years Elderly CareVictorville · 16 mi · Small home$2,800Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Seegal Residential CareVictorville · 16 mi · Small home$4,000Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
- Crystal Garden RCFEApple Valley · 17 mi · Mid-size home$5,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Yorkshire Garden Care #1Apple Valley · 17 mi · Small home$3,200Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Mission of Love IIHesperia · 17 mi · Mid-size home$3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Carmel Care HomeHesperia · 17 mi · Mid-size home$3,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Aging Grace Senior Living FacilityHesperia · 18 mi · Small home$3,800Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Aries Residential CareHesperia · 18 mi · Small home$3,400Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
- Arya Garden Assisted LivingVictorville · 18 mi · Small home$4,900Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Cherry & Pine Garden Home CareHesperia · 23 mi · Small home$3,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Oak Hills Home CareOak Hills · 23 mi · Small home$5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 14 homes with 7 to 49 beds and similar homes within 23 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
- Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
- Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
- Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
- Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
- We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
- It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
- The care level
Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.
- What is billed separately
Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.
- Move-in costs
A one-time move-in fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.
- Increases
California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.
An estimate for planning, not a quote. A home sets the price after hearing about the care needed.
Daily life
Daily life here is not on file yet, and that says nothing about the home.
The best way to see it is a visit.
Request a tourWhere it is
25445 National Trail Hwy, Helendale, CA 92342Address from the public record · October 26, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.
Opening the neighborhood map…
The state record
California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
CDSS public record, read October 26, 2026 · License #366412237 · See the state’s own record
The last 36 months — 4 of 7 documents
20261 state visit · 1 document
Oct 5, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file
We haven’t transcribed this report yet. The complete document is on the state’s site.
20251 state visit · 1 document
Oct 6, 2025Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Magda Malcore made an unannounced visit to the facility to conduct a required annual inspection. LPA met with staff, Lily Mayo and discussed the purpose of the visit. The facility is Residential Care Facility for the Elderly (RCFE) and consists of three (3) one story buildings. LPA conducted an overall inspection of the facility, which included, but was not limited to, the following: Physical Plant/Environment: Indoor and outdoor passageways are free of obstruction. The facility has no swimming pools or similar bodies of water. Outdoor activity area is gated and sufficient for client activities. Indoor areas are sufficient for client activities and facility is maintained at 74 degrees F. The facility has operating carbon monoxide/smoke alarms, fully charged fire extinguishers, first aid kits, laundry equipment, hallway night lights and telephone service. The facility has posted in a common area, Ombudsman poster, Personal Rights, facility license, evacuation sketch plan and emergency telephone numbers. LPA observed cleaning supplies kept unlocked and unattended in two (2) resident bathrooms and in two (2) laundry rooms. Resident bedrooms were equipped with mattresses, bed linen, dressers, chairs, and lighting. LPA observed in Ranch building #1, resident #1 (R1's) bedroom was being used as a passageway into the staff sitting area and back bedrooms. Resident bathrooms were kept clean and equipped with grab rails and slip mats. The hot water temperatures in residents' bathrooms measured 105 and 112 degrees F. Food Service: Facility's kitchen and dining areas were maintained clean. The facility has sufficient non-perishable and perishable food supply for residents in care. The facility has sufficient cups, plates and utensils for resident use. The facility has a posted weekly menu. Medical Related Services: Staff maintain record of client medications and resident medications are centrally stored in locked closets. Record Review: LPA reviewed resident records for Admissions agreements, personal property records, emergency contacts, medical and appraisal records. LPA review of staff files reveals Staff#1 (S1) did not have a health screening with tuberculosis(TB) or chest x-ray screening on file. S1, staff #2(S2), staff #3(S3) did not have record of annual dementia and hospice training on file for review. S2 informed LPA that they and S3 administer medications to the residents. S2 and S3 did not have record of annual medication administration training on file for review. During today's visit, Deficiencies were cited and technical advisories were issued in accordance with Title 22 of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted where this report was discussed. Copies with appeal rights were provided at the conclusion of the visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 6, 2025
The state marks this report as 13 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 7. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
20242 state visits · 2 documents
Dec 11, 2024Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Magda Malcore made an unannounced visit to the facility to conduct a required annual inspection. LPA met with Maria "Teresa" Datuin, Administrator, and discussed the purpose of the visit. The facility is a three (3) building, Residential Care Facility for the Elderly (RCFE) with a license capacity of (18) and a current census of (9) residents in care and hospice waiver for (4). LPA conducted an overall inspection of the facility, which included, but was not limited to, the following: Physical Plant/Environment: Indoor and outdoor passageways are free of obstruction. The facility has no swimming pools or similar bodies of water. Outdoor activity area is gated and sufficient for client activities. The facility has sufficient lighting and is maintained at a 71 degrees F. The facility has operating carbon monoxide/smoke alarms, laundry equipment, signal system and telephone service. Resident 3 1/2 bathroom equipment were operating in a safe and sanitary condition. The hot water temperature in residents' bathrooms measured 119 degrees F. LPA observed a clorox cleaner kept unlocked in resident's bathroom. Staff removed the cleaner. Six (6) resident bedrooms were inspected. LPA observed full bedrails in resident #1 (R1) and resident#2 (R2); R1 and R2 are not receiving hospice care. LPA observed half bedrails in resident # 4 (R4) and resident #5 (R5). The Administrator stated the bed rails are utilized for fall prevention; However this is no documentation of physician's orders approving R4's and R5's bedrails. LPA observed staff utilizing part of R1's room area for facility storage use. The facility has posted in a common area, Ombudsman poster, Personal Rights, disaster evacuation plan and emergency telephone numbers. Food Service: Facility's (3) kitchen areas were maintained clean. The facility has sufficient non-perishable and perishable food supply for residents in care. The facility has posted a weekly menu. In building #1, LPA observed an unlocked kitchen cabinet with cleaning supplies and disinfectants. LPA observed staff attempting to lock the cabinet; however the lock was not working properly. Staff removed the supplies and disinfectants and placed them in a locked medication room. Staff then fixed the locked that was not working properly. Medical Related Services: In building #2, LPA observed an unlocked medication closet were resident's medications were stored and accessible to residents in care. Staff locked the cabinet. Record Review: The facility has a disaster plan and infection control plan for review. Staff files were reviewed for health screening, personnel record (LIC501), criminal record clearances, job training and firstaid/CPR certification. Resident files were reviewed for admission's agreement, preplacement appraisals, personal rights and medical assessments. LPA observed R1's medication was placed in two (2) daily pillboxes. Administrator stated that the resident's spouse wants them to keep them in the pill box. LPA observed Resident #3 (R3's) AM medication from day 1 through day 11 was still in the bubble pack. The Administrator stated that the resident only wants to take the pill once a day; however this is no documentation of resident refusal and no documentation of staff contacting R3's physician of the refusal. The prescription label shows medication to be given twice daily. LPA also observed R3's was out one of their daily medication. The Administrator stated the medication should arrive later today or tomorrow. R3's physicians report/assessment (LIC602) shows resident takes insulin injection pen and uses a foley catheter. Administrator stated that the resident no longer utilizes these items. Interview with resident #3 reveals they are no longer using insulin injections and catheter. Administrator stated she will have an updated medical report conducted. LPA requested a staff schedule from the Administrator; a schedule showing staff hours was not available for review. During today's visit, Deficiencies were cited and technical advisories were issued in accordance with Title 22 of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted where this report was discussed. Copies with appeal rights were provided to the Administrator at the conclusion of the visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 11, 2024
The state marks this report as 13 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 8. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
Feb 14, 2024Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
On 02/14/24, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michelle Echeverria arrived unannounced to conduct the required annual visit to the facility. LPA met caregiver, Lily Mayo and introduced self and stated purpose of the visit. LPA was informed that there are currently 10 residents in care who are in the facility. The facility has 3 buildings: building #1 has 7 resident bedrooms, 1.5 resident bathrooms, 1 staff room, kitchen, dining area, entry room, living room, laundry room, backyard with 1 shed; building #2 has 3 resident bedrooms, 1 bathroom, entry room, kitchen, living room, laundry room, backyard with 1 shed; building # 3 has 2 resident bedrooms, 1 resident bathroom, kitchen and living room. LPA completed a walk through of facility and review of records. Physical Plant: The facility is operating in the capacity approved by Community Care Licensing (CCL). There are no obstructions to indoor and outdoor passageways. The facility is maintained at a comfortable temperature of 73 and 72 degrees fahrenheit. LPA inspected resident bedrooms; they are equipped with required furniture such as: mattresses, night stands, storage space, chairs and sufficient lighting. LPA inspected resident bathrooms; bathrooms were clean and appliances were found functional. Water temperatures tested at 120 and 114.1 degrees fahrenheit. The facility is equipped with carbon monoxide alarms, fire extinguisher and first aid kit. LPA observed 5 smoke detectors in building #1 not functioning, 1 smoke alarm in building #2 not functioning and the ceiling in the living room for building #2 broken. Deficiency issued. Posters such as; the ombudsman and emergency disaster plans were posted in a common area. LPA also observed cleaning supplies, toxins, sharps, and other dangerous items locked in cabinets made inaccessible to residents. There was a designated storage space for resident/staff files. Medications were observed secured and inaccessible to residents. LPA observed the medication moved from its original containers and placed on a small cups ready for the current day dispensing. Deficiency issued. There are no guns or ammunition in the facility. LPA observed the telephone in building #1 not functioning. Deficiency issued. Food Service: Non-perishable and perishable food supply is sufficient for number of residents in care. Dishes, cups, and utensils were also stored properly. Yards/Outside: Three shaded patios, a gate with self-latching handle on the front and back side of the house and 2 sheds used for storage. All outdoor pathways were free of obstructions. Record Review: LPA reviewed 5 resident files for admission agreements, updated physician reports, and needs and services plans. LPA also reviewed staff and administrator's file for First Aid/CPR certification, criminal record clearance, trainings, and health screenings. LPA observed that there was one staff file missing and a missing cpr certification for another staff. Deficiency issued. LPA observed that the posted administrator's certificate expired on 7/13/22. Deficiency issued. The facility did not have the emergency drills log available for inspection. Deficiency issued. LPA observed that the administrator did not have an appointed and approved representative during their vacation absence. Deficiency issued. LPA observed that the posted emergency disaster plan has not been reviewed and updated since 5/14/18. Deficiency issued. LPA observed that the facility did not have a copy of the Infection Control Plan available for inspection. Deficiency issued. LPA observed that the residents bedrooms in building #1 did not have oxygen signs posted and the facility did not have record of the notice sent to the local fire department. Deficiency issued. LPA also observed that the administrator did not have a copy of the liability insurance available for inspection. Deficiency issued. Deficiencies were cited during this visit. An exit interview was conducted where this report LIC809, LIC809C, LIC809D and appeal rights were discussed and copies were provided to caregiver, Lily Mayo.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 14, 2024
Earlier years2021 to 2022 · 3 documents
20222 state visits · 2 documents
Nov 2, 2022Facility evaluation reportPOCDeficiency page: Type A
Type of visit: POC
On 11/02/2022 at 9:40 a.m., Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rayshaun Nickolas conducted a Plan of Correction (POC) visit to confirm that the citation issued on 10/28/2022 has been corrected. LPA arrived and met with Caregiver Anelit Mayores and explained the purpose of the visit. The facility has three (3) separate building also referred to as ranch 1, ranch 2, and ranch 3 by staff. The facility has five (5) clients in care in ranch 2, nine (9) clients in care in ranch 1, and one (1) client in care in ranch 3. On 10/28//2022, LPA Nickolas cited the following deficiency: CCR 87411(a) Personnel Requirements for client # 1 (C1) left unattended in ranch 3. During todays visit the deficiency was not corrected. A civil penalty for a repeat violation has been assessed in the amount of $250.00. This report was discussed with the staff, and copies of this report, LIC 809D, LIC 421FC, and Appeal Rights were provided to Mayores.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 2, 2022
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87411(a) · Plan of correction due date: Nov 2, 2022
87411(a) Personnel Requirements - General Facility personnel shall at all times be sufficient in numbers, and competent to provide the services necessary to meet resident needs.... This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on observation and interview the licensee did not ensure that C1 was not left unattended or a call system was installed in ranch 3, which poses an immediate health, safety, or personal right risks to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 2, 2022
Plan of correction: Licensee shall ensure that staff is present at all times in ranch 3 or install a call system. Licensee shall read CCR 87411(a) and submit a letter of understanding to the Regional Office (RO) by the POC due date.
Oct 28, 2022Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rayshaun Nickolas conducted an unannounced visit to the facility. The purpose of the visit was to conduct a required annual inspection, with an emphasis on infection control due to the COVID-19 pandemic. LPA arrived and met with caregiver Anelit Mayores and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA was asked to sign-in upon arrival. The administrator Teresa Datuin was called by Mayores and Datuin arrived at the facility at 10:45 a.m. During the inspection, LPA conducted a tour of the facility and made observations pertaining to the facility's infection control measures and other health and safety concerns. The facility has three (3) separate building also referred to as ranch 1, ranch 2, and ranch 3 by staff. The facility has five (5) clients in care in ranch 1, nine (9) clients in care in ranch 2, and one (1) client in care in ranch 3. The facility was equipped with sufficient hand hygiene supplies, sufficient cleaning/disinfecting provisions, and a supply of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE). LPA observed facility staff wearing face coverings. The facility has a designated infection control lead person who has been tasked with tracking all COVID-19 cases and/or suspected cases, ensuring PPE supplies are maintained, cleaning and disinfection provisions are in adequate quantities, and that staff are trained in the facility's infection control measures. The facility has a plan in place which follows Community Care Licensing Division (CCLD) guidelines for COVID-19 testing, isolating/quarantining residents, and properly caring for clients with COVID-19 positive results and/or exposures. The facility also has a plan in place to monitor clients regularly for any changes in condition and to subsequently notify the client's physician and emergency personnel in the event the client presents any COVID-19 symptoms. LPA reviewed staff and clients records. LPA was greet by an individual that was volunteering at the facility without the criminal records clearance. Per volunteer # 1 (V1), V1 is a neighbor and retired nursing assistant who has been helping out at the facility since COVID-19 and offered to assist LPA during today's inspection. LPA interview with the administrator revealed that V1 does maintenance around the facility but provides no patient care. LPA observed client # 1 (C1) in ranch 3 with no care providers. LPA interview with staff # 1 (S1) revealed that C1 is the only client in ranch 3. S1 states that there is staff staying in ranch 3 with C1 at night but no one there during the time of our tour, as all other staff were in the other two (2) building. Per S1, ranch 3 does not have an call system to hear the client while staff are away; however, facility staff checks on C1 every 30 minutes LPA also observed during facility file reviews, that C2 has not had a documentation of a medical assessment, signed by a physician, made within the last year. A civil penalty in the amount of $500.00 has been assessed for V1 volunteering without a criminal records clearance. Based on observations made during today’s inspection, three (3) deficiency were cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations (CCR). An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report, LIC 809D, LIC421BG, and Appeal Rights were given to the Administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 28, 2022
20211 state visit · 1 document
Oct 28, 2021Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Stephanie Williams conducted an unannounced visit to the facility. The purpose of the visit was to conduct a required annual inspection, with an emphasis on infection control due to the COVID-19 pandemic. LPA Williams arrived and met with Caregiver, Rodolfo Leonardo. LPA Williams was asked to sign-in and provide temperature reading upon arrival. Rodolfo confirmed that there are currently no cases/exposures of COVID-19 within the facility. During the inspection, LPA Williams conducted a tour of the facility and made observations pertaining to the facility's infection control measures and other health and safety concerns. LPA Williams observed appropriate postings throughout the facility, including hand-washing etiquette, face coverings, and COVID-19 symptoms postings. The facility was also equipped with sufficient hand hygiene supplies, sufficient cleaning/disinfecting provisions, and a supply of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE). LPA Williams observed that the facility staff were wearing face coverings. The facility has a designated infection control lead person who has been tasked with tracking all COVID-19 cases and/or suspected cases, ensuring PPE supplies are maintained, cleaning and disinfection provisions are in adequate quantities, and that staff are trained in the facility's infection control measures. The facility has a plan in place which follows Community Care Licensing Division guidelines for COVID-19 testing, isolating/quarantining residents, and properly caring for residents with COVID-19 positive results and/or exposures. The facility also has a plan in place to monitor residents regularly for any changes in condition and to subsequently notify the resident's physician and emergency personnel in the event the resident presents any COVID-19 symptoms. LPA Williams observed that a total of two of fourteen residents had full bed rails but were not receiving hospice services. Based on observations made during today’s inspection, one deficiency was cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted where this report was discussed and a copy of this report was provided to Leonardo at the conclusion of the inspection.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 28, 2021
License holder
La Cadena Manor Corporation, licensed since 2006.
The state’s totals for this licenseSince 2006, as the state’s facility page counts them
- State visits on file
- 7
- Total complaints
- 0
- Substantiated allegations
- 0
- Type A citations
- 0
- Type B citations
- 0
These are the state’s own totals for this license since 2006, per CDSS records. The state counts them apart from the documents above, and they can differ from what those documents show; the documents say what each visit found. One complaint can contain several allegations.
Compare with homes the same size
| This home | Typical | |
|---|---|---|
| Type A citations | 0 | 0 |
| Type B citations | 0 | 1 |
| Substantiated allegations | 0 | 2 |
| Total complaints | 0 | 6 |
“Typical” is the statewide median for licensed homes this size. It does not adjust for years licensed, and older licenses have had more visits and reports. The median is across the 1,354 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record. The figures compared are the state’s totals, not the documents.
What the state’s words mean
CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents stand in their place.
Frequently asked questions
A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
Quick answers about Loving Care Ranch
Is Loving Care Ranch licensed?
The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
How many residents is Loving Care Ranch licensed for?
18 residents — a mid-size home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Has Loving Care Ranch been cited?
0 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2006, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. Those records count 7 state visits over the same years.
Is Loving Care Ranch still open?
This license was on the CDSS roster as of November 11, 2026.
What does Loving Care Ranch cost?
$4,150 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,300–$5,500. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 14 homes with 7 to 49 beds and similar homes within 23 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Among 77 other homes of a similar licensed size across San Bernardino County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,650 to $4,925 a month, and the middle figure is $4,000 (n = 77 other homes publishing a starting rate).
Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date between September and October 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.
A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.
The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.
A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.
Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
Does Loving Care Ranch take Medi-Cal?
On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Who holds the license?
The license is held by La Cadena Manor Corporation, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Can Loving Care Ranch keep a resident on hospice?
Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 4 residents, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Loving Care Ranch license and inspection record
- Name on the license: “LOVING CARE RANCH”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
- License #366412237. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed for 18 residents — a mid-size home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed to La Cadena Manor Corporation, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- First licensed in 2006, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 7 state inspection visits since 2006, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 0 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2006, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. The same records count 7 state visits in that period.
- 0 complaints and 0 substantiated allegations on file since 2006, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- The most recent state visit on file is October 5, 2026, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗
Nearby
Other homes nearby
Licensed homes near this one in San Bernardino County, most information on file first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.
- Map
Starting rate
$4,900 a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,350 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,400–$5,700On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,600 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,750–$5,700On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,300 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,550–$5,300On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,450 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,650–$5,500On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,100 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,350–$5,050- Assisted living: Licensed by California as a Residential Care Facility for the Elderly — the assisted-living license category.
Street maps © Protomaps · © OpenStreetMap
Explore San Bernardino County