Mountain View Residential Care is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Fontana, San Bernardino County, California — state license #366409921, licensed for 24 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 21 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated April 17, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

3 homes in view

Mountain View Residential Care

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Mid-size home, 24 residents · Fontana, CA · San Bernardino County
LicensedWheelchairMemory care not on fileHospice not on fileBedridden not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #366409921, held since 2006 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
9073 Olive St · Fontana, San Bernardino County
Phone
(909) 822-5174
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 24 residents
Dementia / memory careNot on file — ask the home
Hospice careNot on file — ask the home
Bedridden careNot on file — ask the home

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
24 NON-AMBULATORY.State service designation935 - ELDERLYthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 26 times and filed 21 documents. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on April 17, 2026 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Unsubstantiated.”

Most recent state visit
April 17, 2026
Occupancy at that visit
22 of 24 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 14 documents with transcribed findings, dated August 26, 2021 to April 17, 2026. 14 of the 14 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (5), “Unsubstantiated” (9). 14 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 14 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 13 of 21 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20262 state visits · 2 documents
Apr 17, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff mishandle residents medication Staff did not ensure resident was treated with dignity and respect Staff are not providing adequate food service

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Paola Guerrero arrived at the facility to deliver investigative findings. LPA met with Facility Administrator Steven Prado and explained the purpose of the visit regarding the allegations stated above. First allegation: Staff mishandle residents’ medication. Regarding the allegation stated above, LPA conducted an interview with Staff #1 regarding the alleged allegation Staff #1 denied the allegation and informed LPA that medication for Resident #1 was not denied however, Staff #1 indicated that the medication dosage was not administered to Resident #1 because Resident #1 was requesting medication exceeding R#1 prescribed dosage. Upon medication review LPA observed that medication label indicated 1 tablet by mouth every 8 hours Staff #1 further reported that Resident #1 was requesting to be given two tables for pain and staff provided Resident #1 with one tablet as it indicates on Resident #1 medication label. LPA conducted an interview with Resident #1 rthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 17, 2026 · control 56-AS-20260415124350
Apr 7, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20253 state visits · 3 documents
Sep 16, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Licensee did not ensure that an adequate supply of food was maintained on the premises. Licensee did not ensure that facility bathrooms were maintained in good repair.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Paola Guerrero conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the allegations listed above. LPA met with Facility Administrator Stephen Prado and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of interviews and observations. First allegation: Licensee did not ensure that an adequate supply of food was maintained on the premises. Regarding the allegation LPA conducted an inspection of facilities food supply during the inspection LPA observed enough food supply stored inside three (3) refrigerators and inside freezers. LPA observed enough food supply to be stored to meet the needs of residents in care. During the inspection LPA observed food to be fresh, safe, and shelf stable. In addition, LPA observed that facility’s refrigerators and freezers are in standard with their temperatures according to Tile22 regulation. LPA conducted an interview with S#1 regarding the allegation stated above S#1 informed LPA that facility restocks on fthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 16, 2025 · control 56-AS-20250915081059
Jun 3, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 12, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility is in disrepair. Facility is unsanitary.

On 05/12/2025 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Beena Singh made an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver findings for the allegations stated above. LPA met with Facility Staff-Rosy Rivera and explained the reason for the visit. During today’s visit, LPA Singh conducted interviews with residents, conducted interviews with staff, and requested documents. First Allegation: Facility is in disrepair During visit LPA conducted a room inspection and the following observations were made. Building #1 (B1) and Building#2 (B2) were in disrepair. LPA Singh toured the facility and bathrooms were in disrepair observed leaking faucet in front house (right side bathroom facing down hallway) and bathroom in disrepair in the second (back) house still not fixed.LPA Singh observed broken doors and broken window screens of building#2. No repair records available pertinent to this allegation. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 12, 2025 · control 56-AS-20250505153330
20242 state visits · 2 documents
Mar 18, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility has bed bugs

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Paola Guerrero conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the allegation listed above. LPA met with Facility Caregiver Rosy Rivera and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of observation and interviews. Allegation: Facility has bed bugs During visit LPA conducted a room inspection and the following observations were made. Building #1 (B1) Room#1-4, bed bugs were observed on mattresses and on sheet protectors. Building #2 (B#2) Room#5-9, bed bugs were observed on mattresses and on sheet protectors. Resident #2 (R#2) reported to LPA of being bit by bed bugs all night. S#1 stated facility sprays to mitigate the spread of bed bugs, however, the problem is continuous and bed bug issue has not been resolved. Based on the evidence gathered during investigation, the above allegation is Substantiated. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 18, 2024 · control 56-AS-20240314125534
Mar 8, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20234 state visits · 6 documents
Oct 20, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility not providing adequate cleaning services to resident rooms. Staff yell at residents.

Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Anna Bueno, Magda Malcore, and Bianca Wolcott conducted a subsequent unannounced visit to the facility to continue the investigation the above mentioned complaint allegations and deliver findings. LPAs identified themselves to staff who was informed of the reason for today’s visit and contacted licensee Nenita Carlos. The Department investigation included staff and resident interviews and facility inspections. Allegation 1: Facility not providing adequate cleaning services to resident rooms. Staff interviews reveal that resident rooms are cleaned as needed or requested by residents and are also cleaned on a weekly schedule. During unannounced LPA inspection of resident bedrooms, LPAs observed that rooms are kept tidy according to resident preference and LPAs observed facility staff cleaning rooms. Allegation 2: Staff yell at residents. Interviews with residents reveal that staff do not yell at residents and staff interviews deny that they yell at residethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 20, 2023 · control 18-AS-20210601154523
Oct 20, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility did not follow resident's care plan. Facility did not transport resident to medical appointments. Facility changed resident's choice of physician(s). Facility had pests.

Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Anna Bueno, Magda Malcore, and Bianca Wolcott conducted a subsequent unannounced visit to the facility to continue the investigation the above mentioned complaint allegations and deliver findings. LPAs identified themselves to facility staff who was informed of the reason for today’s visit and contacted licensee Nenita Carlos. The Department investigation included staff and resident interviews and facility inspections. Allegation 1: Facility did not follow resident's care plan. Interviews with resident revealed that, while they go to their own medical appointments, residents will provide copies of the summary visit to staff. Staff interviews reveal that home health service providers communicate with staff on changes to their care. Allegation 2: Facility did not transport resident to medical appointments. Records reviewed show that some residents services that include transportation services. Interviews with residents revealed that they are able to use pthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 20, 2023 · control 18-AS-20210505121329
Oct 20, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Residents are using illegal drugs at the facility.

Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Anna Bueno, Magda Malcore, and Bianca Wolcott conducted a subsequent unannounced visit to the facility to continue the investigation the above mentioned complaint allegations and deliver findings. LPAs identified themselves to facility staff who was informed of the reason for today’s visit and contacted licensee Nenita Carlos. The Department investigation included staff and resident interviews and facility inspections. The investigation revealed that Resident 1 (R1) is not a resident of this facility but lives in the Independent Room & Board located next door to the facility. LPAs were unable to speak with Witness 1 or R1. Staff and resident interview deny consuming illegal substances at the facility. Based on the information revealed during the investigation, this allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. A finding of unsubstantiated means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove ththe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 20, 2023 · control 18-AS-20210615162542
Sep 18, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 1, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff is financially abusing resident.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Paola Guerrero conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the allegation listed above. LPA met with Facility Caregiver Rosy Rivera and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of interviews and a review of records. First allegation, Staff is financially abusing resident. LPA conducted a review of records and observed that on 5/23 facility had evicted Resident #1 (R1). On 6/5 LPA observed that facility cashed Resident # 1 (R1) rent along with PNI. LPA also observed that on 7/6 facility attempted to cash checks for the month of July however, checks were returned because of VOID. The facility was informed that $1,311.12 for rent and $52.00 for PNI is owed and must be paid back to ROG Services. Based on the evidence gathered during the investigation, the above allegation is Substantiated. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 1, 2023 · control 56-AS-20230816105227
Aug 24, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff does not ensure hallways used by residents are clear from tripping hazards

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Paola Guerrero conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the allegation listed above. LPA met with Facility Manager Joney Carlos and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of interviews and review of records. First allegation, Facility staff does not ensure hallways used by residents are clear from tripping hazards. LPA, Fire Marshal, along with Assistant Building Official (ABO), conducted a walkthrough of the facility and observed extension cords running from the facility laundry room over to Building #2, LPA oserved commercial power outlet connected to several appliance outlets in Building #2 which can be a potential fire/and tripping hazard for residents in Building #2; Throughout the walkthrough LPA observed ten (10) power outlets being utilized all throughout building #2. LPA asked Staff #1 about the issue regarding the power outlets around the facility S#1 stated that facility is working on getting their electrithe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 24, 2023 · control 56-AS-20230711142641
Beside homes the same size
Type A citations3typical 1
Type B citations4typical 1
Substantiated complaints11typical 2
Total complaints14typical 7
State visits on file26typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2006.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202622020253312024221202379320222202021330
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$3,500$5,500 /mo
our estimate — San Bernardino County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
If end-of-life care were ever needed, could they stay here? What’s the plan?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (909) 822-5174

Is Mountain View Residential Care licensed?

Yes — Mountain View Residential Care is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Fontana (San Bernardino County): California license #366409921, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 24 residents. State records list 21 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated April 17, 2026, was marked “Unsubstantiated” by the state.

Can Mountain View Residential Care care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Mountain View Residential Care with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory; it does not list dementia / memory care, hospice care, and bedridden. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license record24 NON-AMBULATORY.

How much does Mountain View Residential Care cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Mountain View Residential Care's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in San Bernardino County typically runs $3,500–$5,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $3,000–$5,000/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Mountain View Residential Care accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Mountain View Residential Care is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

22 of 24 beds occupied (92%) when the state visited on April 17, 2026. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Mountain View Residential Care?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 26 state visits and 21 dated documents since 2021 for Mountain View Residential Care; 14 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated April 17, 2026, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

14 transcribed reports on file

2026

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff mishandle residents medication Staff did not ensure resident was treated with dignity and respect Staff are not providing adequate food service
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Paola Guerrero arrived at the facility to deliver investigative findings. LPA met with Facility Administrator Steven Prado and explained the purpose of the visit regarding the allegations stated above. First allegation: Staff mishandle residents’ medication. Regarding the allegation stated above, LPA conducted an interview with Staff #1 regarding the alleged allegation Staff #1 denied the allegation and informed LPA that medication for Resident #1 was not denied however, Staff #1 indicated that the medication dosage was not administered to Resident #1 because Resident #1 was requesting medication exceeding R#1 prescribed dosage. Upon medication review LPA observed that medication label indicated 1 tablet by mouth every 8 hours Staff #1 further reported that Resident #1 was requesting to be given two tables for pain and staff provided Resident #1 with one tablet as it indicates on Resident #1 medication label. LPA conducted an interview with Resident #1 rCDSS inspection report, April 17, 2026 · control 56-AS-20260415124350

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLicensee did not ensure that an adequate supply of food was maintained on the premises. Licensee did not ensure that facility bathrooms were maintained in good repair.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Paola Guerrero conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the allegations listed above. LPA met with Facility Administrator Stephen Prado and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of interviews and observations. First allegation: Licensee did not ensure that an adequate supply of food was maintained on the premises. Regarding the allegation LPA conducted an inspection of facilities food supply during the inspection LPA observed enough food supply stored inside three (3) refrigerators and inside freezers. LPA observed enough food supply to be stored to meet the needs of residents in care. During the inspection LPA observed food to be fresh, safe, and shelf stable. In addition, LPA observed that facility’s refrigerators and freezers are in standard with their temperatures according to Tile22 regulation. LPA conducted an interview with S#1 regarding the allegation stated above S#1 informed LPA that facility restocks on fCDSS inspection report, September 16, 2025 · control 56-AS-20250915081059
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility is in disrepair. Facility is unsanitary.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On 05/12/2025 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Beena Singh made an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver findings for the allegations stated above. LPA met with Facility Staff-Rosy Rivera and explained the reason for the visit. During today’s visit, LPA Singh conducted interviews with residents, conducted interviews with staff, and requested documents. First Allegation: Facility is in disrepair During visit LPA conducted a room inspection and the following observations were made. Building #1 (B1) and Building#2 (B2) were in disrepair. LPA Singh toured the facility and bathrooms were in disrepair observed leaking faucet in front house (right side bathroom facing down hallway) and bathroom in disrepair in the second (back) house still not fixed.LPA Singh observed broken doors and broken window screens of building#2. No repair records available pertinent to this allegation. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, May 12, 2025 · control 56-AS-20250505153330

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility has bed bugs
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Paola Guerrero conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the allegation listed above. LPA met with Facility Caregiver Rosy Rivera and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of observation and interviews. Allegation: Facility has bed bugs During visit LPA conducted a room inspection and the following observations were made. Building #1 (B1) Room#1-4, bed bugs were observed on mattresses and on sheet protectors. Building #2 (B#2) Room#5-9, bed bugs were observed on mattresses and on sheet protectors. Resident #2 (R#2) reported to LPA of being bit by bed bugs all night. S#1 stated facility sprays to mitigate the spread of bed bugs, however, the problem is continuous and bed bug issue has not been resolved. Based on the evidence gathered during investigation, the above allegation is Substantiated. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, March 18, 2024 · control 56-AS-20240314125534

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 26 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
3
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
4
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
11
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
14
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
26
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(909) 822-5174
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Mountain View Residential Care? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.