Mountain View Residential Care is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Fontana, San Bernardino County, California — state license #366409921, licensed for 24 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 21 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated April 17, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.
No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.
Since 2021, the state has visited this home 26 times and filed 21 documents. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on April 17, 2026 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Unsubstantiated.”
The state's published file for this home includes 14 documents with transcribed findings, dated August 26, 2021 to April 17, 2026. 14 of the 14 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (5), “Unsubstantiated” (9). 14 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.
Summary composed by computer from the 14 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.
What the state’s words mean
Apr 17, 2026Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff mishandle residents medication Staff did not ensure resident was treated with dignity and respect Staff are not providing adequate food service
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Paola Guerrero arrived at the facility to deliver investigative findings. LPA met with Facility Administrator Steven Prado and explained the purpose of the visit regarding the allegations stated above. First allegation: Staff mishandle residents’ medication. Regarding the allegation stated above, LPA conducted an interview with Staff #1 regarding the alleged allegation Staff #1 denied the allegation and informed LPA that medication for Resident #1 was not denied however, Staff #1 indicated that the medication dosage was not administered to Resident #1 because Resident #1 was requesting medication exceeding R#1 prescribed dosage. Upon medication review LPA observed that medication label indicated 1 tablet by mouth every 8 hours Staff #1 further reported that Resident #1 was requesting to be given two tables for pain and staff provided Resident #1 with one tablet as it indicates on Resident #1 medication label. LPA conducted an interview with Resident #1 rthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 17, 2026 · control 56-AS-20260415124350
Apr 7, 2026Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Sep 16, 2025Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Licensee did not ensure that an adequate supply of food was maintained on the premises. Licensee did not ensure that facility bathrooms were maintained in good repair.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Paola Guerrero conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the allegations listed above. LPA met with Facility Administrator Stephen Prado and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of interviews and observations. First allegation: Licensee did not ensure that an adequate supply of food was maintained on the premises. Regarding the allegation LPA conducted an inspection of facilities food supply during the inspection LPA observed enough food supply stored inside three (3) refrigerators and inside freezers. LPA observed enough food supply to be stored to meet the needs of residents in care. During the inspection LPA observed food to be fresh, safe, and shelf stable. In addition, LPA observed that facility’s refrigerators and freezers are in standard with their temperatures according to Tile22 regulation. LPA conducted an interview with S#1 regarding the allegation stated above S#1 informed LPA that facility restocks on fthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 16, 2025 · control 56-AS-20250915081059
Jun 3, 2025Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
May 12, 2025Substantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility is in disrepair. Facility is unsanitary.
On 05/12/2025 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Beena Singh made an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver findings for the allegations stated above. LPA met with Facility Staff-Rosy Rivera and explained the reason for the visit. During today’s visit, LPA Singh conducted interviews with residents, conducted interviews with staff, and requested documents. First Allegation: Facility is in disrepair During visit LPA conducted a room inspection and the following observations were made. Building #1 (B1) and Building#2 (B2) were in disrepair. LPA Singh toured the facility and bathrooms were in disrepair observed leaking faucet in front house (right side bathroom facing down hallway) and bathroom in disrepair in the second (back) house still not fixed.LPA Singh observed broken doors and broken window screens of building#2. No repair records available pertinent to this allegation. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 12, 2025 · control 56-AS-20250505153330
Mar 18, 2024Substantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility has bed bugs
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Paola Guerrero conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the allegation listed above. LPA met with Facility Caregiver Rosy Rivera and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of observation and interviews. Allegation: Facility has bed bugs During visit LPA conducted a room inspection and the following observations were made. Building #1 (B1) Room#1-4, bed bugs were observed on mattresses and on sheet protectors. Building #2 (B#2) Room#5-9, bed bugs were observed on mattresses and on sheet protectors. Resident #2 (R#2) reported to LPA of being bit by bed bugs all night. S#1 stated facility sprays to mitigate the spread of bed bugs, however, the problem is continuous and bed bug issue has not been resolved. Based on the evidence gathered during investigation, the above allegation is Substantiated. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 18, 2024 · control 56-AS-20240314125534
Mar 8, 2024Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Oct 20, 2023Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility not providing adequate cleaning services to resident rooms. Staff yell at residents.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Anna Bueno, Magda Malcore, and Bianca Wolcott conducted a subsequent unannounced visit to the facility to continue the investigation the above mentioned complaint allegations and deliver findings. LPAs identified themselves to staff who was informed of the reason for today’s visit and contacted licensee Nenita Carlos. The Department investigation included staff and resident interviews and facility inspections. Allegation 1: Facility not providing adequate cleaning services to resident rooms. Staff interviews reveal that resident rooms are cleaned as needed or requested by residents and are also cleaned on a weekly schedule. During unannounced LPA inspection of resident bedrooms, LPAs observed that rooms are kept tidy according to resident preference and LPAs observed facility staff cleaning rooms. Allegation 2: Staff yell at residents. Interviews with residents reveal that staff do not yell at residents and staff interviews deny that they yell at residethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 20, 2023 · control 18-AS-20210601154523
Oct 20, 2023Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility did not follow resident's care plan. Facility did not transport resident to medical appointments. Facility changed resident's choice of physician(s). Facility had pests.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Anna Bueno, Magda Malcore, and Bianca Wolcott conducted a subsequent unannounced visit to the facility to continue the investigation the above mentioned complaint allegations and deliver findings. LPAs identified themselves to facility staff who was informed of the reason for today’s visit and contacted licensee Nenita Carlos. The Department investigation included staff and resident interviews and facility inspections. Allegation 1: Facility did not follow resident's care plan. Interviews with resident revealed that, while they go to their own medical appointments, residents will provide copies of the summary visit to staff. Staff interviews reveal that home health service providers communicate with staff on changes to their care. Allegation 2: Facility did not transport resident to medical appointments. Records reviewed show that some residents services that include transportation services. Interviews with residents revealed that they are able to use pthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 20, 2023 · control 18-AS-20210505121329
Oct 20, 2023Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Residents are using illegal drugs at the facility.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Anna Bueno, Magda Malcore, and Bianca Wolcott conducted a subsequent unannounced visit to the facility to continue the investigation the above mentioned complaint allegations and deliver findings. LPAs identified themselves to facility staff who was informed of the reason for today’s visit and contacted licensee Nenita Carlos. The Department investigation included staff and resident interviews and facility inspections. The investigation revealed that Resident 1 (R1) is not a resident of this facility but lives in the Independent Room & Board located next door to the facility. LPAs were unable to speak with Witness 1 or R1. Staff and resident interview deny consuming illegal substances at the facility. Based on the information revealed during the investigation, this allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. A finding of unsubstantiated means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove ththe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 20, 2023 · control 18-AS-20210615162542
Sep 18, 2023Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Sep 1, 2023Substantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff is financially abusing resident.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Paola Guerrero conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the allegation listed above. LPA met with Facility Caregiver Rosy Rivera and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of interviews and a review of records. First allegation, Staff is financially abusing resident. LPA conducted a review of records and observed that on 5/23 facility had evicted Resident #1 (R1). On 6/5 LPA observed that facility cashed Resident # 1 (R1) rent along with PNI. LPA also observed that on 7/6 facility attempted to cash checks for the month of July however, checks were returned because of VOID. The facility was informed that $1,311.12 for rent and $52.00 for PNI is owed and must be paid back to ROG Services. Based on the evidence gathered during the investigation, the above allegation is Substantiated. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 1, 2023 · control 56-AS-20230816105227
Aug 24, 2023Substantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility staff does not ensure hallways used by residents are clear from tripping hazards
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Paola Guerrero conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the allegation listed above. LPA met with Facility Manager Joney Carlos and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of interviews and review of records. First allegation, Facility staff does not ensure hallways used by residents are clear from tripping hazards. LPA, Fire Marshal, along with Assistant Building Official (ABO), conducted a walkthrough of the facility and observed extension cords running from the facility laundry room over to Building #2, LPA oserved commercial power outlet connected to several appliance outlets in Building #2 which can be a potential fire/and tripping hazard for residents in Building #2; Throughout the walkthrough LPA observed ten (10) power outlets being utilized all throughout building #2. LPA asked Staff #1 about the issue regarding the power outlets around the facility S#1 stated that facility is working on getting their electrithe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 24, 2023 · control 56-AS-20230711142641
Year-by-year trend
Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.
No Google listing is on file for this home. When one exists, its rating, review themes, and hours appear here — attributed to Google, never blended with the state record, and never part of how we rank homes.
This home hasn’t added its own details yet. When the operator claims this page, their photos, tour video, activities, languages, and staffing answers appear here — always labeled as theirs, never blended with the state record. Operators: claim your home, free →
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Is Mountain View Residential Care licensed?
Yes — Mountain View Residential Care is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Fontana (San Bernardino County): California license #366409921, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 24 residents. State records list 21 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated April 17, 2026, was marked “Unsubstantiated” by the state.
Can Mountain View Residential Care care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?
From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.
The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Mountain View Residential Care with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory; it does not list dementia / memory care, hospice care, and bedridden. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.
From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.
What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license record24 NON-AMBULATORY.
How much does Mountain View Residential Care cost?
California's public licensing record does not include Mountain View Residential Care's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in San Bernardino County typically runs $3,500–$5,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $3,000–$5,000/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.
Does Mountain View Residential Care accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?
Mountain View Residential Care is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.
Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →
22 of 24 beds occupied (92%) when the state visited on April 17, 2026. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.
What do state inspections show for Mountain View Residential Care?
Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.
The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 26 state visits and 21 dated documents since 2021 for Mountain View Residential Care; 14 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated April 17, 2026, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated”. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.
Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.
2026
2025
2024
Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.
What the state has logged
California has logged 26 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.
You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.
(909) 822-5174Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.
Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →
See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →
This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →
Do you run Mountain View Residential Care? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.