Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Royalty Senior Living

Small home·Licensed for 6·Jurupa Valley, California

Licensed since 2021Licence #331881033Medi-Cal ALW
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · September 27, 2026
  • Starting rate$4,500 a monthListed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026
  • Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit3 of 6 beds occupiedJuly 13, 2026 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payMedi-Cal ALW acceptedDHCS participant list · August 9, 2026
  • Last state visitJuly 13, 2026CDSS inspection record

Royalty Senior Living is a small care home in Jurupa Valley — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents since 2021. Dementia care is not on file.

Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Royalty Senior Living

Is Royalty Senior Living licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

How many residents is Royalty Senior Living licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Has Royalty Senior Living been cited?

0 Type A and 1 Type B citation since 2021, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 12 state visits over the same years.

Is Royalty Senior Living still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Royalty Senior Living cost?

$4,500 a month to start — listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026.

The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly, seen September 9, 2026.

Among 160 other homes of a similar licensed size across Riverside County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,800 to $5,000 a month, and the middle figure is $4,500 (n = 160 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out. What Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver covers in a care home.

Does Royalty Senior Living take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home appears on the DHCS participation list, August 9, 2026. Confirm eligibility and current participation with the program. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by 818 Development Inc., per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Can Royalty Senior Living keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Royalty Senior Living license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “ROYALTY SENIOR LIVING”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #331881033. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed to 818 Development Inc., per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2021, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 12 state inspection visits since 2021, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 1 Type B citation on file since 2021, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 12 state visits in that period.
  • 7 complaints and 1 substantiated allegation on file since 2021, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is July 13, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 4 residents
  • Dementia / memory careNot on file · ask the home
  • Hospice careApproved by the state
  • BedriddenApproved by the state

State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
1 AMBULATORY. 4 NON-AMBULATORY. 1 BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER APPROVED FOR 6.

935 - ELDERLY

CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

4 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation not on file

    Ask: “If memory loss develops, what would change — and when would a move be needed?”

Care & day-to-day support

These are the home’s own statements about its day-to-day practice — they are not part of the state licensing record, and the state has not approved or reviewed them.

  • Respite / short-term stays

    Reported on seniorly.com · source dated July 24, 2026.

  • Help with bathing or showering

    Reported on seniorly.com · source dated July 24, 2026.

  • Assistance with transfers

    Reported on seniorly.com · source dated July 24, 2026.

  • Medication management

    Reported on seniorly.com · source dated July 24, 2026.

  • Works with residents’ own health care providers

    Reported on seniorly.com · source dated July 24, 2026.

  • Diabetic / carbohydrate-controlled diet

    Reported on seniorly.com · source dated July 24, 2026.

  • Help with dressing and grooming

    Reported on seniorly.com · source dated July 24, 2026.

  • Building is wheelchair accessible

    Reported on seniorly.com · source dated July 24, 2026.

  • Preventive health screenings

    Reported on seniorly.com · source dated July 24, 2026.

Nights & staffing

  • 24-hour supervision claimed

    Reported on seniorly.com · source dated July 24, 2026.

  • Emergency call system

    Reported on seniorly.com · source dated July 24, 2026.

What it costs here

This home’s starting rate

$4,500a month to start

Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026 · See listing

Likely monthly total

$4,500a month

Likely $4,500–$5,100

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · where the price comes from
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room

Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.

  • Starting monthly rate$4,500this home

    The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly, seen September 9, 2026.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $4,500–$5,100
$4,500
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,500–$8,600
$6,500
How people payOn the Medi-Cal waiver list · private pay, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home appears on the DHCS participation list, August 9, 2026. Confirm eligibility and current participation with the program. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board. For a resident on SSI/SSP, California’s 2026 standard sends $1,444.07 a month to the home for room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWhere this price comes from

The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly, seen September 9, 2026.

8 homes like this within 5 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,550–$4,500.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 8 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 10104 Kings Ct, Jurupa Valley, CA 92509Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2021, the state has filed 13 documents for this home, and its records count 12 visits since 2021. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on July 13, 2026 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Unsubstantiated.”

On file since
2021
State visits
12
Most recent visit
July 13, 2026
Occupied at that visit
3 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 7 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated January 12, 2023 to July 13, 2026. 7 of the 7 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (6). 7 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 7 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations0typical 0
  • Type B citations1typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations1typical 0
  • Total complaints7typical 0

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2021.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20264402025220202345120221102021110

The last 36 months — 8 of 13 documents

20264 state visits · 4 documents
Jul 13, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not meet residents hygiene care needs. Facility is not releasing medical information to residents responsible person.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Beena Singh arrived to the facility to conclude a complaint investigation regarding the above allegations. LPA Beena Singh met with Tricia Zendejas, Caregiver, and was granted entry to the facility. During the visit there were two staff and three residents present. LPA Singh conducted a walk through of the facility. Facility Staff Administrator Shana Williams arrived during the visit and LPA Singh explained the elements of the complaint. First Allegation:-Staff did not meet residents hygiene care needs. During the interviews conducted by LPA Singh with facility residents and staff, Resident #1 (R#1) reported being completely independent with their activities of daily living (ADLs). They specified that they manage all personal hygiene needs autonomously, requiring no assistance from staff for hair care or showering Furthermore, R#1 stated that they have been well looked after by the facility staff and expressed having no issues with their care. Unsubstantiated Second Allegation:-Facility is not releasing medical information to residents responsible person. During an in-person interview with Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Singh, Resident #1 stated that facility staff consistently keep their family and responsible party fully informed regarding all medical appointments. Furthermore, the resident#1 and staff emphasized that the staff routinely provide any necessary information and updates to their family members and responsible party, ensuring they remain completely aware of the resident's medical care and schedules. Based on the evidence found during the investigation, the allegations listed above Staff did not meet residents hygiene care needs and Facility is not releasing medical information to residents responsible person are deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the complaints are UNSUBSTANTIATED means although the allegation may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur. During today’s visit, no deficiencies were cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted with Facility Staff Administrator Shana Williams, and a copy of this report was provided at the conclusion of the visitthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 13, 2026 · control 56-AS-20260311135217
Apr 18, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff is not allowing resident to return to facility for re-entry.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Paola Guerrero arrived at the facility to deliver investigative findings. LPA met with Facility Administrator Ta’Neisha Riley and explained the purpose of the visit regarding the allegations stated above. First allegation: Staff is not allowing resident to return to facility for re-entry. Regarding the allegation stated above, LPA conducted an interview with Staff #1 regarding the alleged allegation Staff #1 informed LPA that on January 21,2025 Resident #1 was taken to the hospital due to a witness fall. Staff #1 further indicated that Resident #1 was later transported to the hospital via ambulance due to abnormal vitals. Staff #1 informed LPA that while Resident #1 was at hospital the hospital had discovered that Resident #1 was having an irregular heart rhythm which prompted the hospital to admit Resident #1. Staff #1 informed LPA that Resident #1 was admitted on January 22,2025 for further evaluation. Staff #1 informed LPA that while R#1 was at the hospital family informed Staff #1 that Resident #1 may longer be suitable to go back to the facility as Resident #1 needs to be placed at a facility with higher level of care. Unsubstantiated Staff #1 informed LPA that on January 22, 2025, at 9:31 am Staff #1 was informed by family that Resident#1 was assessed and will be placed to new facility (Southwoods Living) upon resident’s discharge. Staff #1 informed LPA that Resident #1 was discharged from Kaiser on January 28,2025 and was transported and admitted to their new facility Southwoods Living. Staff #1 denied the allegation of “not allowing resident to return back to the facility” and stated that Resident #1 family discharged the resident from the facility and placed Resident #1 at Southwoods living facility to be closer to family. Based on corroborating evidence LPA has determined that the above allegation is Unsubstantiated, meaning that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. An exit interview was conducted where this report (LIC 9099) was discussed, and a copy was provided to Facility Administrator Ta’Neisha Riley.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 18, 2026 · control 56-AS-20250124141042
Feb 20, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident was sexually assaulted by another resident in care. Staff did not report incident to CCL.

Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Raquel Hernandez conducted an unannounced visit for the purpose of delivering findings for allegations listed above. LPA met with Administrator Ta'Neisha Riley and explained the purpose of the visit. On 08/15/2023, the Department received a complaint alleging that a resident was being sexually assaulted by another resident in care. The Department investigation consisted of reviews of facility files and other records, observations, and interviews with pertinent individuals. It is alleged that Resident #1 (R1) was sexually assaulted by Resident #2 (R2) at facility on 08/13/2023, sometime late at night. Department staff interviewed R1 pertaining to the allegation of sexual assault and R1 denied that the allegation occurred. Based on observations and interviews, the department was unable to determine if sexual assault did or did not occur. Unsubstantiated It is also alleged that facility staff did not report the incident to Community Care Licensing (CCL). Observation of records review revealed that a special incident report (SIR) was received in the CCL regional office on 08/22/2023, regarding the mentioned allegation. Based on interviews conducted and evidence gathered during this investigation, the allegations listed above are deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED means although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is no preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. During today’s visit, no deficiencies pertaining to the allegations were cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted, and this report (LIC9099) was discussed and provided to Administrator Ta'Neisha Riley.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 20, 2026 · control 56-AS-20230815164705
Feb 18, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Paola Guerrero made an unannounced visit to the facility. The purpose of the visit was to conduct a required comprehensive annual inspection. LPA met with Facility Administrator Ta'Neisha Riley and was granted entry to the facility. At the time of the visit there were three (3) staff present, and three (3) residents present. The facility is a five (5) bedroom, three (3), bathroom home, with a kitchen/dining area, living room, and attached garage. The facility is a Residential Care Facility for Elderly (RCFE) Licensed capacity is (6) current census (3). LPA was accompanied by Facility Administrator, to conduct a general overall inspection, which included, but was not limited to, the following: Physical Plant: The facility is operating in the capacity approved by Community Care Licensing (CCL). There are no obstructions to indoor and outdoor passageways. The facility is maintained at a comfortable temperature. LPA inspected residents’ bedrooms; they are equipped with required furniture such as mattresses, nightstands, storage space, and sufficient lighting; bathrooms were clean, and appliances were operating appropriately. LPA observed sufficient furniture and lighting throughout the facility. LPA measured and observed the water temperatures in the bathrooms to be 110.6 degrees F The facility is equipped with operating smoke detectors and carbon monoxide alarms. Posters such as personal rights, the CCL complaint poster, and the disaster plan were posted in a common area. Cleaning supplies, toxins, sharps, and other dangerous items were kept inaccessible to residents in care. There was a designated storage space for resident/staff files. Medications are kept inside medication closet inaccessible to residents in care. During the inspection LPA observed an in-ground pool in the backyard; the perimeter of pool is gated and locked. Overall, the facility is clean, in good repair, and operates in safe conditions for residents in care. Food Service: Non-perishable and perishable food supply is sufficient for number of residents in care. Care & Supervision: Facility has sufficient care staff for coverage 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. All staff members working in the facility have criminal record clearance through the department. Record Review: LPA reviewed three (3) resident files for admission agreements, updated physician reports, and needs and services plans. LPA also reviewed three (3) staff files for First Aid/CPR certification, criminal record clearance, training, and health screenings. Medications were audited at random and appeared to be dispensed appropriately by staff members. Based on the observations made during today’s visit, no deficiencies were cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted, and this report (LIC809) was discussed and provided to Facility Administrator Ta'Neisha Riley .the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 18, 2026
20252 state visits · 2 documents
Dec 2, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff denied a resident's authorized representative from calling the facility

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Javier Prieto arrived to the facility to conduct a complaint investigation regarding the above allegation. LPA Prieto met with Facility-Administrator-Ta'neisha Riley and explained the elements of the complaint. Allegation #1 - Administrator Riley (S1) explained to LPA the facility phone is available for all residents in the home. Facility phone is a handheld phone capable of receiving and making calls. This phone does not have the capability of blocking calls. LPA spoke resident #1 (R1) who state she receives calls from family members on the facility and capable of making and declining calls on her own. R1 states staff has never denied her incoming calls to the facility. LPA observed facility phone call list which indicate calls made to this phone. None of the numbers listed indicate that they were block. These numbers were obtained for this complaint during this investigation. *** continued on LIC 9099C*** Unsubstantiated Based on the information obtained there is not enough evidence to support the allegation made in this complaint. Therefore, the allegation is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. This report was signed by LPA Prieto and Administrator Riley and a copy was left with the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 2, 2025 · control 56-AS-20251201131529
Jan 15, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On1/15/2025 at 12:20 PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Beena Singh conducted an unannounced annual required visit. LPA was greeted and granted entry to the facility by Administrator Ta'Neisha Riley . LPA Singh explained the nature of today's visit. LPA Singh accompanied with Ms Riley, conducted a general overall inspection, which included, but was not limited to the following: Physical Plant: The facility was not operating over capacity or beyond any conditions and limitations on the license. The pools and other bodies of water located on the premises and secured gates and are in compliance with regulation. Facility is being maintained at a comfortable temperature for residents. All outdoor and indoor passageways are kept free of obstruction. Hot water temperature was measured at 115 degrees Fahrenheit in all resident bathrooms. There are grab bars for each toilet, bathtub and shower used by residents. The facility smoke detectors and carbon monoxide devices were tested and found to be in working order. Facility has been approved for 6 ambulatory residents. During today's inspection, LPA Singh toured the interior and exterior of the facility. The medications are centrally stored and locked in a closet located in the hallway opposite of the Master bedroom. The smoke and carbon monoxide detectors are operable and tested. There were 4 fully charged fire extinguishers observed LPA Singh observed all cleaning supplies are locked in a cabinet located in the laundry room and underneath the kitchen sink. The sharp objects are stored in a lock box, inside of the pantry located inside of the kitchen. All doors, and passageways are clear from obstruction and were equipped with night lights. There is a fire place located in the family room that is screened and covered with glass. All beds have the required linen and supplies. There was a sufficient amount of clean linen and hygiene items stored in two cabinets located in both hallways. There was appropriate lighting in each room. There are no fire arms or ammunition stored at the facility. Food Service: There is a minimum of one week supply of nonperishable foods and 2 days of perishable foods. Dishes, cups, and utensils were also stored properly. Record Review: LPA requested and reviewed three (3) resident and three (3) staff files. LPA Singh reviewed staff files for current CPR/1st aide certificates, TB results, and required training's. LPA observed the emergency disaster plan, facility sketch, personal rights, and theft and loss policy, PUB 475 complaint poster hung on the wall in the entryway. Administration: LPA Singh did not observe any excluded individuals on the premises at time of visit. The Administrator appears to be on the premises a sufficient number of hours to manage and oversee the business operation. Medical Related Services: Prescriptions and non-prescription PRN medications contain a signed and dated written order from a physician. Medications are centrally locked in the staff office and inaccessible to residents in care. Medications are being administered as prescribed by physician's directions. No deficiencies cited. An exit interview was conducted where this report was provided and discussed with Ms Riley.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 15, 2025
20232 state visits · 2 documents
Dec 22, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Javier Prieto conducted an unannounced annual required visit. LPA was greeted and granted entry to the facility by Administrator Ta'Neisha Riley . LPA explained the nature of today's visit. LPA accompanied with Ms Riley, conducted a general overall inspection, which included, but was not limited to the following: Physical Plant: The facility was not operating over capacity or beyond any conditions and limitations on the license. The pools and other bodies of water located on the premises and secured gates and are in compliance with regulation. Facility is being maintained at a comfortable temperature for residents. All outdoor and indoor passageways are kept free of obstruction. Hot water temperature was measured at 107 degrees Fahrenheit in all resident bathrooms. There are grab bars for each toilet, bathtub and shower used by residents. The facility smoke detectors and carbon monoxide devices were tested and found to be in working order. Food Service: There is a minimum of one week supply of nonperishable foods and 2 days of perishable foods. Care and Supervision: The facility has ensured sufficient and competent staff to provide the services needed to meet resident needs. Record Review: LPA requested and reviewed six (6) resident and one (1) staff files. LPA reviewed staff files for current CPR/1st aide certificates, TB results, and required training's. Administration: LPA did not observe any excluded individuals on the premises at time of visit. The Administrator appears to be on the premises a sufficient number of hours to manage and oversee the business operation. Medical Related Services: Prescriptions and non-prescription PRN medications contain a signed and dated written order from a physician. Medications are centrally locked in the staff office and inaccessible to residents in care. Medications are being administered as prescribed by physician's directions. No deficiencies cited. An exit interview was conducted where this report was provided and discussed with Ms Riley.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 22, 2023
Nov 27, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Javier Prieto arrived to the facility to conduct a case management visit. LPA Prieto met with Administrator Riley. LPA Prieto toured facility and found that the facility is clean and free of odors. No obstructions outside, in hallways or bedroom entries. LPA Prieto observed recently fire cleared bedrooms. The facility appears to be in compliance relating to title 22 regulations. LPA also had administrator Riley sign amended complaint report 56-AS-20230501085745. This report (LIC 809) and amended complaint report (LIC 9099) were signed by LPA Prieto and administrator Riley and a copy was left at the home.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 27, 2023
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

Find a detail about life at this home.

Rooms & the spaces they will use

  • Private rooms

    Reported on seniorly.com · source dated July 24, 2026.

  • Outdoor spaceGarden · Walking paths

    Reported on seniorly.com · source dated July 24, 2026.

  • Shared / companion rooms

    Reported on seniorly.com · source dated July 24, 2026.

  • Common areasSwimming pool / jacuzzi · Game room · Dining room

    Reported on seniorly.com · source dated July 24, 2026.

  • Rooms come furnished

    Reported on seniorly.com · source dated July 24, 2026.

  • LaundryDone by staff

    Reported on seniorly.com · source dated July 24, 2026.

  • Air conditioning in the room

    Reported on seniorly.com · source dated July 24, 2026.

  • Visitor parking

    Reported on seniorly.com · source dated July 24, 2026.

  • Telephone in the room

    Reported on seniorly.com · source dated July 24, 2026.

  • AmenitiesMove-in coordination

    Reported on seniorly.com · source dated July 24, 2026.

  • Housekeeping

    Reported on seniorly.com · source dated July 24, 2026.

Meals, preferences & familiar food

  • All-day or flexible dining

    Reported on seniorly.com · source dated July 24, 2026.

  • Food allergy management

    Reported on seniorly.com · source dated July 24, 2026.

  • Meal timesScheduled meals

    Reported on seniorly.com · source dated July 24, 2026.

  • Meals provided

    Reported on seniorly.com · source dated July 24, 2026.

Activities & the rhythm of a day

  • Activity types offeredMovie nights

    Reported on seniorly.com · source dated July 24, 2026.

  • Resident-run activities

    Reported on seniorly.com · source dated July 24, 2026.

Faith, culture & language

  • Languages spoken by caregiversEnglish

    Reported on seniorly.com · source dated July 24, 2026.

Visiting & staying involved

  • Support services for families

    Reported on seniorly.com · source dated July 24, 2026.

  • Transportation

    Reported on seniorly.com · source dated July 24, 2026.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in Riverside County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Riverside County