Love 2 Care Homes is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Apple Valley, San Bernardino County, California — state license #361880919, licensed for 6 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 9 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated June 23, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

5 homes in view

Love 2 Care Homes

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Small home, 6 residents · Apple Valley, CA · San Bernardino County
LicensedWheelchairHospiceMemory care not on fileBedridden not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #361880919, held since 2020 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
19432 Us Highway 18 · Apple Valley, San Bernardino County
Phone
(760) 297-6277
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 2 residents
Dementia / memory careNot on file — ask the home
Hospice careApproved for 2 residents
Bedridden careNot on file — ask the home

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. FOUR (4) AMBULATORY AND TWO (2) NON-AMBULATORY RESIDENTS IN BEDROOM #3. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR TWO (2).State service designation935 - ELDERLYthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 10 times and filed 9 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated June 23, 2026.

Most recent state visit
June 23, 2026
Occupancy at the August 26, 2024 visit
3 of 6 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 4 documents with transcribed findings, dated December 27, 2023 to August 26, 2024. 4 of the 4 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (3). 4 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 4 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 8 of 9 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20262 state visits · 2 documents
Jun 23, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 27, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20242 state visits · 3 documents
Aug 26, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are not adequately trained to meet resident needs. Facility accepted a resident who requires a higher level of care.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Mary Rico conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the allegations listed above. LPA met with care giver Eula Jones and contacted the Administrator Terri Jackson by a phone call. LPA explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of staff interviews, client interviews and record review. For the allegation, Staff are not adequately trained to meet resident needs. During staff interviews 3 out of the 3 staff stated they are trained to meet residents needs. 1 out of the 3 staff stated, all staff members are trained before providing care. During resident interviews 2 out of the resident stated all staff members assist with their ADLs. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 26, 2024 · control 56-AS-20240305091344
Aug 26, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Administrator changed resident's advanced directive without authorized representatives consent Staff are mismanaging resident's medication Staff are not meeting resident's needs Staff are not providing activities for residents Staff are not conducting quarterly emergency drills Staff are not providing adequate food service to residents

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Mary Rico conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the allegations listed above. LPA met with care giver Eula Jones and contacted the Administrator Terri Jackson by a phone call. LPA explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of staff interviews, resident interviews and record review. For the allegation, Administrator changed resident's advanced directive without authorized representatives consent. During staff interviews 2 out of the 3 staff stated Administrator did not change R1 advanced directive. 1 out of the 3 staff stated they did not change resident advanced directive without representative consent. In addition, 1 out of the 3 staff informed LPA that R1 was in year 2023 R1 was in hopsice. By the year 2024 R1 was discharge from hospice. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 26, 2024 · control 56-AS-20240308121331
Jun 18, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20232 state visits · 3 documents
Dec 27, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not provide resident activities Staff do not provide residents adequate food service Staff transferred resident incorrectly

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Mary Rico conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the allegations listed above. LPA met with Care Giver Eula Jones and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of staff interviews, resident interviews, document reviews, and facility tour. For the allegation, staff do not provide resident activities. During interviews with residents, 4 out of the 5 residents stated the facility does not provide activities for them. R1 and R2 informed LPA the facility only provides a crossword sheet. R1 informed LPA they have offered ideas on what activities they should provide but the facility does not have enough staff. R1 stated the facility does not provide the activities that is listed on their calendar. In addition, R3 informed LPA they would prefer for the facility to provide exercise activities. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 27, 2023 · control 56-AS-20231114102757
Dec 27, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are not adequately trained to meet resident needs

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Mary Rico conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the allegation listed above. LPA met with care giver Eula Jones and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of staff interviews, and document reviews. For the allegation, Staff are not adequately trained to meet resident needs. During interviews with staff, all staff stated they are adequately trained to meet residents needs. Administrator informed LPA they provided training to staff before they begin assisting residents. All staff stated they receive training before they assistance residents on their own. During record review, LPA received staff training. LPA indicated all staff member are trained to be meet resident’s needs. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 27, 2023 · control 56-AS-20231114102757
Nov 16, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations1typical 0
Type B citations2typical 0
Substantiated complaints3typical 0
Total complaints3typical 0
State visits on file10typical 6
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 5,773 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2020.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20262202024230202323120221102021110
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$3,500$5,500 /mo
our estimate — San Bernardino County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
Ask how the 2023 complaint investigation report was corrected — what changed?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (760) 297-6277

Is Love 2 Care Homes licensed?

Yes — Love 2 Care Homes is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Apple Valley (San Bernardino County): California license #361880919, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 6 residents. State records list 9 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated June 23, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Love 2 Care Homes care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Love 2 Care Homes with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory and hospice care; it does not list dementia / memory care and bedridden. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. FOUR (4) AMBULATORY AND TWO (2) NON-AMBULATORY RESIDENTS IN BEDROOM #3. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR TWO (2).

How much does Love 2 Care Homes cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Love 2 Care Homes's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in San Bernardino County typically runs $3,500–$5,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $3,000–$5,000/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Love 2 Care Homes accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Love 2 Care Homes is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

3 of 6 beds occupied (50%) when the state visited on August 26, 2024. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Love 2 Care Homes?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 10 state visits and 9 dated documents since 2021 for Love 2 Care Homes; 4 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated August 26, 2024, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

4 transcribed reports on file

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are not adequately trained to meet resident needs. Facility accepted a resident who requires a higher level of care.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Mary Rico conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the allegations listed above. LPA met with care giver Eula Jones and contacted the Administrator Terri Jackson by a phone call. LPA explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of staff interviews, client interviews and record review. For the allegation, Staff are not adequately trained to meet resident needs. During staff interviews 3 out of the 3 staff stated they are trained to meet residents needs. 1 out of the 3 staff stated, all staff members are trained before providing care. During resident interviews 2 out of the resident stated all staff members assist with their ADLs. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, August 26, 2024 · control 56-AS-20240305091344
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedAdministrator changed resident's advanced directive without authorized representatives consent Staff are mismanaging resident's medication Staff are not meeting resident's needs Staff are not providing activities for residents Staff are not conducting quarterly emergency drills Staff are not providing adequate food service to residents
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Mary Rico conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the allegations listed above. LPA met with care giver Eula Jones and contacted the Administrator Terri Jackson by a phone call. LPA explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of staff interviews, resident interviews and record review. For the allegation, Administrator changed resident's advanced directive without authorized representatives consent. During staff interviews 2 out of the 3 staff stated Administrator did not change R1 advanced directive. 1 out of the 3 staff stated they did not change resident advanced directive without representative consent. In addition, 1 out of the 3 staff informed LPA that R1 was in year 2023 R1 was in hopsice. By the year 2024 R1 was discharge from hospice. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, August 26, 2024 · control 56-AS-20240308121331

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not provide resident activities Staff do not provide residents adequate food service Staff transferred resident incorrectly
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Mary Rico conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the allegations listed above. LPA met with Care Giver Eula Jones and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of staff interviews, resident interviews, document reviews, and facility tour. For the allegation, staff do not provide resident activities. During interviews with residents, 4 out of the 5 residents stated the facility does not provide activities for them. R1 and R2 informed LPA the facility only provides a crossword sheet. R1 informed LPA they have offered ideas on what activities they should provide but the facility does not have enough staff. R1 stated the facility does not provide the activities that is listed on their calendar. In addition, R3 informed LPA they would prefer for the facility to provide exercise activities. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, December 27, 2023 · control 56-AS-20231114102757
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are not adequately trained to meet resident needs
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Mary Rico conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the allegation listed above. LPA met with care giver Eula Jones and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of staff interviews, and document reviews. For the allegation, Staff are not adequately trained to meet resident needs. During interviews with staff, all staff stated they are adequately trained to meet residents needs. Administrator informed LPA they provided training to staff before they begin assisting residents. All staff stated they receive training before they assistance residents on their own. During record review, LPA received staff training. LPA indicated all staff member are trained to be meet resident’s needs. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, December 27, 2023 · control 56-AS-20231114102757

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 10 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds), computed across all 5,773 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
1
typical for this size: 0
Type B citations
2
typical for this size: 0
Substantiated complaints
3
typical for this size: 0
Total complaints
3
typical for this size: 0
State visits on file
10
typical for this size: 6
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(760) 297-6277
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Love 2 Care Homes? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.