Whispering Winds Of Apple Valley Assisted Living is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Apple Valley, San Bernardino County, California — state license #361880646, licensed for 116 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 15 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2022, the most recent dated June 15, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

3 homes in view

Whispering Winds Of Apple Valley Assisted Living

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 116 residents · Apple Valley, CA · San Bernardino County
LicensedWheelchairHospiceMemory care not on fileBedridden not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #361880646, held since 2019 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
11825 Apple Valley Road · Apple Valley, San Bernardino County
Phone
(760) 961-1212
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 116 residents
Dementia / memory careNot on file — ask the home
Hospice careVerified in record
Bedridden careNot on file — ask the home

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 116 NON-AMBULATORY. HOSPICE WAIVER INCREASED FROM 12 TO 30.State service designation935 - ELDERLYthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2022, the state has visited this home 16 times and filed 15 documents. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on June 15, 2026 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Unsubstantiated.”

Most recent state visit
July 15, 2026
Occupancy at the June 15, 2026 visit
100 of 116 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 7 documents with transcribed findings, dated November 13, 2024 to June 15, 2026. 7 of the 7 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Unsubstantiated” (7). 7 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 7 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 13 of 15 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20265 state visits · 8 documents
Jun 15, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not provide proper food service to residents in care resulting in an illness

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Paola Guerrero arrived at the facility to deliver investigative findings. LPA met with Executive Director Jeff Gollihar and explained the purpose of the visit regarding the allegations stated above. First allegation: Staff did not provide proper food service to residents in care resulting in illness. Regarding the allegation stated above, LPA conducted interview with Staff #1 regarding the alleged allegation Staff #1 informed LPA that on 3/9/2026, the facility reported to Community Care Licensing about an epidemic outbreak in which eight (8) residents were experiencing symptoms such as diarrhea and vomiting. Staff #1 informed LPA that the facility followed their infection control plan and contacted Public Health Communicable Disease Department. Staff #1 informed LPA that this incident did not pertain to the food that was being served at the facility. LPA conducted an interview with Resident #1-3 and all denied the allegation and informed LPA that they hathe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 15, 2026 · control 56-AS-20260311100927
Jun 15, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 21, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not ensure residents received their medication in a timely manner Staff are not meeting residents bathing needs Staff released resident records without appropriate consent

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Magda Malcore conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to conclude the investigation on the above allegations. LPA identified self and met with Health & Wellness Director, Iliana Silva. The investigation consisted of interviews with pertinent parties, LPA observation, and document review. Regarding allegation#1, staff did not ensure residents received their medication in a timely manner, interviews with five (5) staff and five (5) residents reveal that staff are ensuring residents receive their medication in a timely manner. Regarding allegation#2, staff are not meeting residents bathing needs, interviews with five (5) staff and five (5) residents, reveal that staff are meeting resident's bathing needs. Regarding allegation#3, staff released resident records without appropriate consent, interviews with five (5) staff and five (5) residents, reveal not enough evidence to corroborate that staff released resident records without appropriate consent. *the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 21, 2026 · control 56-AS-20260430081726
May 15, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 11, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not inform authorized representative of new medication. Resident has unexplained bruises do to lack of supervision. Staff did not notify authorized representative of change in residents condition.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Beena Singh conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver findings on above allegation. LPA Singh met with Executive Director-Jeffrey Gollihar, facility representative, and was granted entry into the facility. The investigation conducted by LPA Singh consisted of interviews and records review. First Allegation: Staff did not inform authorized representative of new medication. LPA Singh reviewed records and according to facility documentation facility staff did inform authorized representative of new medication. Five(5) out of Five(5) residents stated that staff do notify any changes or meeting takes place at the facility regarding the residents change of medication or any matter related to the residents well being. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 11, 2026 · control 56-AS-20241107100718
Mar 11, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not dispense medication to resident as prescribed. Staff did not address a change in resident’s condition in a timely manner. Staff did not notify resident’s responsible party of a meeting regarding a change in resident’s condition. Staff did not maintain a completed care plan for resident.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Beena Singh conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver findings on above allegation. LPA Singh met with Executive Director-Jefferey Gollihar, facility representative, and was granted entry into the facility. The investigation conducted by LPA Singh consisted of interviews and records review. First Allegation:-Staff did not dispense medication to resident as prescribed. Resident#1 was under Hospice care and medication was prescribed by their physician and been updated accordingly. LPA Singh reviewed records, interviewed nurse director who stated all staff follow the hospice care plan if residents are on hospice or by the physician order. Staff contact responsible party to notify any changes in medication. Five (5) out of Five(5) residents stated they have been given medications according to prescriptions. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 11, 2026 · control 56-AS-20240424141448
Mar 11, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff allowed resident to enter a contract without resident's representative consent. Staff transferred resident to memory care without resident's representative consent.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Beena Singh conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver findings on above allegation. LPA Singh met with Executive Director-Jefferey Gollihar, facility representative, and was granted entry into the facility. The investigation conducted by LPA Singh consisted of interviews and records review. First Allegation:Staff allowed resident to enter a contract without resident's representative consent. LPA Singh reviewed records and R#1 can legally enter into any financial agreements when they signed the original documets on 04/11/2024,and later R#1s Responsible party-family, who is the Durable Power of Attorney (DPOA) and Successor Trustee of R#1s trust, had to sign an affidavit to change the trustee due to R#1's mental incompetence on 11/19/2024. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 11, 2026 · control 56-AS-20241204154507
Feb 9, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20252 state visits · 3 documents
Apr 1, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility administrator is not present in the facility an adequate amount of hours. Lack of supervision resulting in residents wandering from the facility. Facility is understaffed. Facility is dirty. Staff are not properly trained. Staff did not administer resident medications according to physician orders. Staff do not respond to resident(s) call buttons. Residents needs are not being met.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Becky Mann conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to initiate a complaint investigation. LPA Mann met with Jeffrey Gollihar, Executive Director and explained the purpose of today's visit. The investigation consisted of LPAs observations, pertinent document reviews, and interviews with staff and residents. The allegation of facility administrator is not present in the facility an adequate amount of hours. All staff interviewed stated that facility administrator is present in the facility all the time and sometimes on the weekends. All residents interviewed stated that facility administrator is present and is there to assist when needed. The allegation of lack of supervision resulting in residents wandering from the facility. All staff interviewed denied there being a lack of supervision at the facility and no resident has wandered from the facility. All residents interviewed stated there is no lack of supervision at the facility. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 1, 2025 · control 18-AS-20210719132953
Feb 26, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 26, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20242 state visits · 2 documents
Nov 13, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not ensure residents bathroom was cleaned properly. Staff did not ensure resident's water container was cleaned.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Magda Malcore conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to initiate a complaint investigation on the above allegations. LPA met with Executive Director, Jeff Gollihar and explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation, staff did not ensure resident's bathroom was cleaned properly, LPA inspected six (6) resident bathrooms and observed bathroom showers and toilets were cleaned. Interviews with staff and residents reveal staff are ensuring bathrooms are maintained clean. Regarding the allegation, staff did not ensure resident's water container was cleaned, interviews with staff and residents reveal not enough evidence that staff did not ensure resident's drinking water container was cleaned. Based on LPA observations and interviews with pertinent parties, the above allegations are Unsubstantiated. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 13, 2024 · control 56-AS-20241107100718
Feb 23, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations0typical 1
Type B citations0typical 1
Substantiated complaints0typical 2
Total complaints7typical 7
State visits on file16typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2019.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20265802025230202422020232202022110
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$3,500$5,500 /mo
our estimate — San Bernardino County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?
How are care plans reviewed when a resident’s needs change?

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (760) 961-1212

Is Whispering Winds Of Apple Valley Assisted Living licensed?

Yes — Whispering Winds Of Apple Valley Assisted Living is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Apple Valley (San Bernardino County): California license #361880646, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 116 residents. State records list 15 inspection and complaint documents since 2022; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated June 15, 2026, was marked “Unsubstantiated” by the state.

Can Whispering Winds Of Apple Valley Assisted Living care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Whispering Winds Of Apple Valley Assisted Living with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory and hospice care; it does not list dementia / memory care and bedridden. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 116 NON-AMBULATORY. HOSPICE WAIVER INCREASED FROM 12 TO 30.

How much does Whispering Winds Of Apple Valley Assisted Living cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Whispering Winds Of Apple Valley Assisted Living's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in San Bernardino County typically runs $3,500–$5,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $3,000–$5,000/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Whispering Winds Of Apple Valley Assisted Living accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Whispering Winds Of Apple Valley Assisted Living is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

100 of 116 beds occupied (86%) when the state visited on June 15, 2026. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Whispering Winds Of Apple Valley Assisted Living?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 16 state visits and 15 dated documents since 2022 for Whispering Winds Of Apple Valley Assisted Living; 7 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated June 15, 2026, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

7 transcribed reports on file

2026

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not provide proper food service to residents in care resulting in an illness
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Paola Guerrero arrived at the facility to deliver investigative findings. LPA met with Executive Director Jeff Gollihar and explained the purpose of the visit regarding the allegations stated above. First allegation: Staff did not provide proper food service to residents in care resulting in illness. Regarding the allegation stated above, LPA conducted interview with Staff #1 regarding the alleged allegation Staff #1 informed LPA that on 3/9/2026, the facility reported to Community Care Licensing about an epidemic outbreak in which eight (8) residents were experiencing symptoms such as diarrhea and vomiting. Staff #1 informed LPA that the facility followed their infection control plan and contacted Public Health Communicable Disease Department. Staff #1 informed LPA that this incident did not pertain to the food that was being served at the facility. LPA conducted an interview with Resident #1-3 and all denied the allegation and informed LPA that they haCDSS inspection report, June 15, 2026 · control 56-AS-20260311100927
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not ensure residents received their medication in a timely manner Staff are not meeting residents bathing needs Staff released resident records without appropriate consent
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Magda Malcore conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to conclude the investigation on the above allegations. LPA identified self and met with Health & Wellness Director, Iliana Silva. The investigation consisted of interviews with pertinent parties, LPA observation, and document review. Regarding allegation#1, staff did not ensure residents received their medication in a timely manner, interviews with five (5) staff and five (5) residents reveal that staff are ensuring residents receive their medication in a timely manner. Regarding allegation#2, staff are not meeting residents bathing needs, interviews with five (5) staff and five (5) residents, reveal that staff are meeting resident's bathing needs. Regarding allegation#3, staff released resident records without appropriate consent, interviews with five (5) staff and five (5) residents, reveal not enough evidence to corroborate that staff released resident records without appropriate consent. *CDSS inspection report, May 21, 2026 · control 56-AS-20260430081726
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not inform authorized representative of new medication. Resident has unexplained bruises do to lack of supervision. Staff did not notify authorized representative of change in residents condition.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Beena Singh conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver findings on above allegation. LPA Singh met with Executive Director-Jeffrey Gollihar, facility representative, and was granted entry into the facility. The investigation conducted by LPA Singh consisted of interviews and records review. First Allegation: Staff did not inform authorized representative of new medication. LPA Singh reviewed records and according to facility documentation facility staff did inform authorized representative of new medication. Five(5) out of Five(5) residents stated that staff do notify any changes or meeting takes place at the facility regarding the residents change of medication or any matter related to the residents well being. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, March 11, 2026 · control 56-AS-20241107100718
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not dispense medication to resident as prescribed. Staff did not address a change in resident’s condition in a timely manner. Staff did not notify resident’s responsible party of a meeting regarding a change in resident’s condition. Staff did not maintain a completed care plan for resident.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Beena Singh conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver findings on above allegation. LPA Singh met with Executive Director-Jefferey Gollihar, facility representative, and was granted entry into the facility. The investigation conducted by LPA Singh consisted of interviews and records review. First Allegation:-Staff did not dispense medication to resident as prescribed. Resident#1 was under Hospice care and medication was prescribed by their physician and been updated accordingly. LPA Singh reviewed records, interviewed nurse director who stated all staff follow the hospice care plan if residents are on hospice or by the physician order. Staff contact responsible party to notify any changes in medication. Five (5) out of Five(5) residents stated they have been given medications according to prescriptions. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, March 11, 2026 · control 56-AS-20240424141448
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff allowed resident to enter a contract without resident's representative consent. Staff transferred resident to memory care without resident's representative consent.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Beena Singh conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver findings on above allegation. LPA Singh met with Executive Director-Jefferey Gollihar, facility representative, and was granted entry into the facility. The investigation conducted by LPA Singh consisted of interviews and records review. First Allegation:Staff allowed resident to enter a contract without resident's representative consent. LPA Singh reviewed records and R#1 can legally enter into any financial agreements when they signed the original documets on 04/11/2024,and later R#1s Responsible party-family, who is the Durable Power of Attorney (DPOA) and Successor Trustee of R#1s trust, had to sign an affidavit to change the trustee due to R#1's mental incompetence on 11/19/2024. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, March 11, 2026 · control 56-AS-20241204154507

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility administrator is not present in the facility an adequate amount of hours. Lack of supervision resulting in residents wandering from the facility. Facility is understaffed. Facility is dirty. Staff are not properly trained. Staff did not administer resident medications according to physician orders. Staff do not respond to resident(s) call buttons. Residents needs are not being met.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Becky Mann conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to initiate a complaint investigation. LPA Mann met with Jeffrey Gollihar, Executive Director and explained the purpose of today's visit. The investigation consisted of LPAs observations, pertinent document reviews, and interviews with staff and residents. The allegation of facility administrator is not present in the facility an adequate amount of hours. All staff interviewed stated that facility administrator is present in the facility all the time and sometimes on the weekends. All residents interviewed stated that facility administrator is present and is there to assist when needed. The allegation of lack of supervision resulting in residents wandering from the facility. All staff interviewed denied there being a lack of supervision at the facility and no resident has wandered from the facility. All residents interviewed stated there is no lack of supervision at the facility. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, April 1, 2025 · control 18-AS-20210719132953

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not ensure residents bathroom was cleaned properly. Staff did not ensure resident's water container was cleaned.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Magda Malcore conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to initiate a complaint investigation on the above allegations. LPA met with Executive Director, Jeff Gollihar and explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation, staff did not ensure resident's bathroom was cleaned properly, LPA inspected six (6) resident bathrooms and observed bathroom showers and toilets were cleaned. Interviews with staff and residents reveal staff are ensuring bathrooms are maintained clean. Regarding the allegation, staff did not ensure resident's water container was cleaned, interviews with staff and residents reveal not enough evidence that staff did not ensure resident's drinking water container was cleaned. Based on LPA observations and interviews with pertinent parties, the above allegations are Unsubstantiated. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, November 13, 2024 · control 56-AS-20241107100718

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 16 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing. No substantiated complaints are on file.

Type A citations
0
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
0
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
0
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
7
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
16
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →

Who runs Whispering Winds Of Apple Valley Assisted Living?

From the CDSS ownership record, checked August 9, 2026.

Licensed to Welltower Pegasus Tenant Llc; Psl Associates Llc, who operates 4 licensed California homes in total. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.

Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(760) 961-1212
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Whispering Winds Of Apple Valley Assisted Living? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.